Use of enoxaparin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin's anticoagulation effect makes it the principal component in the immediate treatment of all thrombotic diseases. After hemorrhage, the most important complication of heparin is thrombocytopenia, the decrease in the number of blood platelets. Ten cases of "heparin-induced thrombocytopenia" are described, and guidelines for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients who present for cardiac and vascular surgery are given. Methods of treating patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including use of arachidonic acid derivatives, antiplatelet agents, other anticoagulants, heparinoids, natural and synthetic thrombin inhibitors, hirudin, and defibrinogenation with ancrod, are discussed.

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of low molecular weight heparin in active ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

In several open and 1 controlled trial, unfractionated heparin was effective in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) had a similar effect in several open studies.

METHODS

We studied the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LMWH in mild to moderately active UC in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In all, 29 patients with a mild or moderate recurrence of UC during salicylate treatment were randomized to receive either reviparin 3,436 IU (n = 15) subcutaneously twice daily or placebo (n = 14). The study period was 8 weeks. Treatment was discontinued if there was no improvement at 4 weeks or at any disease progression. Primary outcome measure was clinical improvement at 8 weeks measured by the Colitis Activity Index (CAI) and the Clinical Symptoms Grading (CSG, based on the CAI). Endoscopic and histologic grading and quality of life as measured by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) were secondary outcome measures. Patients were closely monitored for adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty of 29 patients finished the 8-week treatment period (reviparin versus placebo: 11 versus 9; P = 0.70). There was no difference in CSG, CAI, endoscopic and histologic grading, or IBDQ. Treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

In this study, treatment with LMWH showed no significant clinical advantage compared to placebo in mild to moderately active UC.

The management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology has produced a concise practical guideline to highlight the key issues in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) for the practicing physician in the UK. The guideline is evidence-based and levels of evidence are included in the body of the article. All patients who are to receive heparin of any sort should have a platelet count on the day of starting treatment. For patients who have been exposed to heparin in the last 100 d, a baseline platelet count and a platelet count 24 h after starting heparin should be obtained. For all patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH), alternate day platelet counts should be performed from days 4 to 14. For surgical and medical patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) platelet counts should be performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving treatment doses of LMWH should have platelet counts performed every 2-4 d from days 4 to 14. Obstetric patients receiving prophylactic LMWH are at low risk and do not need routine platelet monitoring. If the platelet count falls by 50% or more, or falls below the laboratory normal range and/or the patient develops new thrombosis or skin allergy between days 4 and 14 of heparin administration HIT should be considered and a clinical assessment made. If the pretest probability of HIT is high, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant started at full dosage unless there are significant contraindications while laboratory tests are performed. Platelet activation assays using washed platelets have a higher sensitivity than platelet aggregation assays but are technically demanding and their use should be restricted to laboratories experienced in the technique. Non-expert laboratories should use an antigen-based assay of high sensitivity. Only IgG class antibodies need to be measured. Useful information is gained by reporting the actual optical density, inhibition by high concentrations of heparin, and the cut-off value for a positive test rather than simply reporting the test as positive or negative. In making a diagnosis of HIT the clinician's estimate of the pretest probability of HIT together with the type of assay used and its quantitative result (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, only) should be used to determine the overall probability of HIT. Clinical decisions should be made following consideration of the risks and benefits of treatment with an alternative anticoagulant. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, heparin should be stopped and full-dose anticoagulation with an alternative, such as lepirudin or danaparoid, commenced (in the absence of a significant contraindication). Warfarin should not be used until the platelet count has recovered. When introduced in combination with warfarin, an alternative anticoagulant must be continued until the International Normalised Ratio (INR) is therapeutic for two consecutive days. Platelets should not be given for prophylaxis. Lepirudin, at doses adjusted to achieve an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio of 1.5-2.5, reduces the risk of reaching the composite endpoint of limb amputation, death or new thrombosis in patients with HIT and HIT with thrombosis (HITT). The risk of major haemorrhage is directly related to the APTT ratio, lepirudin levels and serum creatinine levels. The patient's renal function needs to be taken into careful consideration before treatment with lepirudin is commenced. Severe anaphylaxis occurs rarely in recipients of lepirudin and is more common in previously exposed patients. Danaparoid in a high-dose regimen is equivalent to lepirudin in the treatment of HIT and HITT. Danaparoid at prophylactic doses is not recommended for the treatment of HIT or HITT. Patients with previous HIT who are antibody negative (usually so after >100 d) who require cardiac surgery should receive intraoperative UFH in preference to other anticoagulants that are less validated for this purpose. Pre- and postoperative anticoagulation should be with an anticoagulant other than UFH or LMWH. Patients with recent or active HIT should have the need for surgery reviewed and delayed until the patient is antibody negative if possible. They should then proceed as above. If deemed appropriate early surgery should be carried out with an alternative anticoagulant. We recommend discussion of these complex cases requiring surgery with an experienced centre. The diagnosis must be clearly recorded in the patient's medical record.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: twenty-nine years later

OBJECTIVE

To determine the current frequency, types of patients, indications for testing, morbidity and mortality, and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

METHODS

Between December 1998 and July 2001, the charts of 102 inpatients that tested positive for heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (HAAb) were reviewed. There were 33,941 inpatients, 10,348 of them having received unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins. HAAb were determined by platelet aggregometry.

RESULTS

There were 58 males and 44 females with a mean age of 56 years. The majority (72%) of patients were admitted to a surgical service (23% were admitted to medicine, and 5% were admitted to obstetrics/pediatrics). Indications for testing included one or more low platelet counts (n = 51), unexplained arterial (n = 33) or venous (n = 6) thromboses, resistance to anticoagulation (n = 1), prior history of HAAb (n = 3), organ transplant (n = 17), or other indication (n = 4). The HAAb "patterns" were variable, with patients having antibodies only to bovine (n = 7) or porcine heparin (n = 5), bovine and porcine heparins (n = 17), enoxaparin (n = 3), fragmin (n = 7), or all 4 heparins (n = 43). The HIT-related mortality was 6.9%, and the morbidity was 30% with 19 arterial and 7 venous thromboses and 5 bleeding events. Management consisted of discontinuation of heparin in 95 patients. Twenty-five patients did not require continued anticoagulation. When needed, anticoagulation was continued with a direct thrombin inhibitor (n = 32), enoxaparin (n = 16), warfarin (n = 15), or aspirin (n = 7). Seven patients continued to receive unfractionated heparin (n = 4) or low molecular weight heparin (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

HIT occurs in 0.99% of inpatients receiving heparin and remains an important nondiscriminatory contributor to their morbidity and mortality. Patients receiving any form of heparin who develop a decreasing platelet count, unexplained thrombosis, or resistance to heparin anticoagulation should be tested for HAAb. If HAAb are detected, patients must not receive the sensitizing heparin(s).

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: pathophysiology and management

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well-defined syndrome. Clinical criteria (thrombocytopenia, resistance to heparin anticoagulation, or thromboses during heparin therapy) are defined, and serologic diagnostic tests are available. Earlier recognition of HIT syndrome has allowed for significant advances in therapy, leading to marked reductions in morbidity and mortality from HIT syndrome. This review addresses the epidemiology, pathobiology, and management of HIT syndrome

Lepirudin is a safe and effective anticoagulant for patients with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether lepirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is a safe and effective anticoagulant for patients with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (HAAbs).

METHODS

The charts of HAAb-positive patients who received lepirudin were reviewed. Lepirudin use was analyzed for indication, duration, and effectiveness of anticoagulation, and for adverse events. HAAb presence was determined by platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

Eighteen HAAb-positive patients received lepirudin: 9 had previous documentation of HAAb, 6 had thrombocytopenia while receiving heparin; and 3 had HAAb after a thrombotic event. The indications for lepirudin anticoagulation included thromboembolism prophylaxis (5), arterial thromboses (5), pulmonary embolus (3) or deep venous thrombosis (1), and one each for atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, artificial heart valves, and hemodialysis access. The average duration of therapy was 4.04 days. Fifteen patients achieved adequate anticoagulation (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] ratio > 2.0) with lepirudin. Seven patients had aPTTs that were sometimes supratherapeutic (aPTT > 100 seconds) but did not bleed. In all patients who had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, platelet counts were normalized while they received lepirudin. There were two complications: one patient fell and had a calf hematoma (aPTT ratio 3.24), and one patient who received lepirudin during nine separate hospitalizations had epistaxis (aPTT ratio 2.86) during her ninth hospitalization. Another patient received lepirudin during two hospitalizations without an adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Lepirudin is a safe and effective anticoagulant for patients with HAAbs. The platelet counts of all patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were normalized while they received lepirudin. Careful monitoring of the aPTT and avoidance of trauma while patients are receiving lepirudin are recommended.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia thrombosis (HIT/T) syndrome: diagnosis and treatment

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia thrombosis (HIT/T) is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is essentially clinical and negative results of laboratory assays do not exclude the diagnosis. Treatment involves stopping all heparin immediately and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor. The adoption of low molecular weight heparins is one reason for the reduced incidence of this disease in recent years.

The caput medusae of hypercoagulability

Thrombosis may be the most common cause of death in the United States. Virchow postulated, approximately 150 years ago, that intravascular thrombosis was caused by changes of the vessel wall, by reduction in blood flow, and by alteration of the chemical composition of the blood. The hypercoagulability component of the Virchow triad has, until recently, been poorly defined. During the past 40 years, a number of acquired and congenital hypercoagulable disorders have been described so that currently the cause for thrombotic events can be determined in many patients. The hypercoagulable-related thromboses are usually venous but may, less often, be arterial, and the thromboses often are the cause of significant morbidity and mortality. The vascular surgeon often participates in the management of hypercoagulable disorders. This review of hypercoagulable disorders is presented with the hope that the early recognition of these disorders will lead to the appropriate diagnosis and proper management of hypercoagulable-related thromboses.

Low molecular weight heparins: differences and similarities in approved preparations in the United States

There is adequate preclinical data to support the differential biochemical and pharmacological behavior of the currently approved low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) in the United States. Initial studies on the anti-Xa, anti-IIa, and U.S. Pharmacopoeial (USP) potencies have clearly demonstrated differences among these products. Furthermore, the ratios between the anti-X and anti-IIa activities vary from one product to another. This is primarily due to the composition of each product manufactured by using different patented methods. Studies in pharmacologic animal models, using gravimetric dosages or adjusted anti-Xa dosages of the LMWHs, produce product-specific results. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of each product also vary markedly and are not predictable on the basis of any pharmacopoeial potency designation. These agents are capable of releasing tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), an inhibitor of the coagulation process. Its release is also dependent on the type of LMWH. In the United States enoxaprin, dalteparin, and ardeparin have been approved for DVT prophylaxis. Only enoxaparin and dalteparin have been approved for the acute coronary syndrome. Recently the clinical differentiation among these LMWHs has been demonstrated in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Similarly, when these drugs are used at high dosages, they are expected to produce product-specific pharmacodynamic effects. It must be noted that while these drugs may be interchangeable at clinically optimized/approved dosages, these drugs are not interchangeable at equivalent anti-Xa dosages. Even at optimized dosages, the clinical provile of each drug may be different. Thus, each of the LMWHs should be considered a distinct entity and their use in a given clinical situation should be validated in proper clinical trials.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: diagnosis and contemporary antithrombin management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may be complicated by severe thrombotic complications and death. Currently no specific laboratory test is available to make the diagnosis. When HIT is clinically suspected, heparin should be discontinued immediately. While no specific therapy for HIT exists, there is increasing evidence that acute antithrombin therapy may significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Among several agents, the direct antithrombins, such as r-hirudin and argatroban, look the most promising for acute treatment.

The role of heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies in the outcome of arterial reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the incidence rate of heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (HAAb) in patients who require major vascular reconstruction and to determine whether the HAAb were associated with perioperative thrombotic events.

METHODS

One hundred six patients who underwent elective arterial reconstruction for cerebrovascular occlusive disease (n = 48), aortoiliac occlusive disease (n = 13), aortoiliac aneurysm (n = 17), mesenteric arterial occlusive disease (n = 1), or infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease (n = 28) prospectively underwent evaluation from July 1, 1996, to June 30, 1997. Heparin-associated antibody tests (with a two-point platelet aggregation assay) and platelet counts (via Coulter counter) were performed before surgery and on or after the 4th day after vascular reconstruction. Arterial reconstruction thromboses were established by means of duplex ultrasound scanning or angiography. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and venous thromboses were diagnosed with clinical criteria and duplex ultrasound scanning, respectively. A significant decrease in platelet count was defined as a platelet count of less than 100, 000/mm3 or as a more than 30% drop in the platelet count.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (21%) had at least one positive HAAb assay: one assay was positive before surgery only (after angiography), six were positive both before and after surgery, and 15 were positive after surgery only. There were three perioperative deaths-one in the HAAb-positive group and two in the HAAb-negative group. Ten thrombotic events occurred in the perioperative period. Four thrombotic events (three operative site thromboses and one AMI) occurred in the HAAb-positive group (18.2%). All of these patients were undergoing heparin therapy. Of the six patients (with three operative site thromboses, two deep venous thromboses, and one AMI) in the HAAb-negative group (7%; P =.21), three were undergoing heparin therapy. No patient who was HAAb positive with a thrombotic event had thrombocytopenia or a significant decrease in platelet count.

CONCLUSION

The frequent exposure to heparin by patients with peripheral vascular disease is associated with a high incidence rate (21%) of HAAb formation, which makes it one of the more common hypercoagulable conditions in these patients. The patients who were HAAb positive had a 2.6-fold increase in perioperative thrombotic events. Thrombocytopenia or decreasing platelet counts were not reliable clinical markers for identifying patients who were HAAb positive. It is suggested that all patients who have undergone heparin therapy and who have an unexplained perioperative thrombotic event develop should undergo testing for HAAb.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis has been recognized increasingly as a serious complication of heparin use. This article reviews type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which is mediated by an antibody that in most cases has specificity for a complex between heparin and platelet factor 4, a secreted platelet alpha-granule protein. The antibody-heparin-platelet factor 4 complex can activate platelets and endothelial cells, thereby initiating thrombosis. Clinical thrombosis in this syndrome may be arterial or venous. Treatment of the syndrome requires discontinuation of heparin and institution of an alternative anticoagulant.

Newer strategies for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Treatment with heparin is associated with two types of thrombocytopenia. One is a mild, transient, nonimmune disorder, generally without adverse clinical consequence. The other, known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is a potentially serious, immunoglobulin-mediated reaction with a paradoxic high risk of thromboembolic events. Various treatment options for HIT are discussed, with emphasis on pharmacologic approaches that control the increased thrombin generation characteristic of this disorder.

Case managing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and its two subtypes, early onset (Type I) and delayed onset (Type II), are becoming an increasing concern in acute care. Also called "white clot syndrome," this condition can lead to thrombosis and loss of limb. Alternatives to heparin therapy, such as low molecular weight heparin, are discussed as ways to decrease HIT. An algorithm has been developed to guide identification and monitoring of patients at risk for HIT. The article presents the expanded role of the clinical nurse specialist as case manager in clinically managing patients with actual or potential HIT. The case manager's role for patients receiving heparin lies in increasing the awareness of this condition among all clinicians and serving as a resource for current information regarding its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Reduced morbidity and mortality rates of the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome

PURPOSE

We reported a 61% morbidity rate and a 23% mortality rate for the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome in 1983. We subsequently reported in 1987 that with early recognition, immediate cessation of the administration of heparin, and platelet function inhibition, the morbidity rate could be reduced to 23% and the mortality rate to 12%. One hundred recent cases of patients with heparin-associated antiplatelet antibodies (HAAb) have been reviewed to determine whether aggressive screening, early diagnosis, and alternate management could further reduce morbidity and mortality rates.

METHODS

The consecutive records of 100 patients with positive platelet aggregation tests were reviewed. Sixty-six patients were male. The patients' ages ranged from 23 days to 92 years. The patients were from vascular (28), cardiothoracic (42), and other (30) services. HIT was suspected in patients who received heparin and had falling platelet counts, platelet counts less than 100,000/mm3, or new thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events.

RESULTS

Heparin was not offered to six patients with known HAAb. Twelve patients were successfully treated with antiplatelet therapy and limited reexposure to heparin, and 75 patients were successfully treated with early diagnosis and prompt cessation of heparin. Alternate forms of anticoagulation therapy were used selectively. Seven patients had 11 complications. Three of the seven patients were treated successfully with warfarin anticoagulation and aspirin (2) or with aspirin alone (1). A fourth patient was treated with thrombectomy, hematoma evacuation, and aspirin. A fifth patient underwent thrombolysis and coronary angioplasty in addition to receiving warfarin and aspirin. The sixth patient required two thrombectomies and warfarin. A seventh patient required two thrombectomies and aspirin. HIT was responsible for one of 17 deaths.

CONCLUSION

A 7.4% morbidity rate and a 1.1% mortality rate have been achieved in patients with HAAb by aggressive screening, early recognition of HIT, and prompt cessation of the administration of heparin. Platelet function inhibitors and other anticoagulants, including nonreacting low molecular weight heparin, are important adjuncts in the management of the thromboembolic disorders associated with HIT.

Heparinoid anticoagulation and topical fibrin sealant in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

The development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients who require systemic anticoagulation for cardiac and vascular operations poses a therapeutic dilemma because no alternative anticoagulants are generally available. Heparinoid (Org 10172) has been used as an alternative anticoagulant under protocol or on a compassionate use basis, and has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. There is, however, no heparinoid antagonist to reverse the anticoagulation. This report describes the combined use of heparinoid anticoagulation and adjunctive fibrin sealant for topical hemostasis in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Recommendations for perioperative monitoring of heparinoid anticoagulation are provided.

Low molecular weight heparin(oid)s. Clinical investigations and practical recommendations

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is traditionally used for prevention and treatment of thrombosis. However, its use is associated with a clinically relevant bleeding risk. Low molecular weight heparin(oid) [LMWH] preparations have been designed to improve upon the efficacy and safety ratio of UFH. They have been investigated in clinical studies following the favourable outcome of extensive animal experimentation to determine their efficacy in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and in arterial thrombotic conditions such as ischaemic stroke, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and unstable angina. Indeed, an improved efficacy/safety ratio of LMWHs in the prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis in high risk orthopaedic surgery patients has been observed as compared to UFH prophylaxis. No significant differences with respect to antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding complications were observed in patients with relatively lower risk such as in those undergoing general surgery. Subsequently, these agents have been investigated for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. The results of a series of clinical trials reveal that LMWHs are at least as safe and effective as UFH for initial treatment, with the additional advantage of the possibility of home treatment without the requirement of laboratory control and with a reduced risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Preliminary data suggest that LMHWs may be suitable for thromboprophylaxis in neurosurgery and stroke patients; in addition, they may have a place in the treatment of patients with acute stroke, unstable angina and individuals in the post-myocardial infarction stage. However, additional confirmatory data for these potential indications are required before definite recommendations can be given. LMWH compounds have at least a similar efficacy and safety as UFH in haemodialysis. In addition, they simplify the anticoagulant regimen because of the efficacy of a single predialysis bolus injection.

The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist c7E3 inhibits platelet aggregation in the presence of heparin-associated antibodies

PURPOSE

Heparin-associated antibodies (HAAb), in the presence of heparin, can cause platelet activation and aggregation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, c7E3, would inhibit platelet aggregation in the presence of HAAb. If aggregation is inhibited by c7E3, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) would be done to determine whether c7E3 interfered with the binding of heparin and the HAAb.

METHODS

HAAb-positive plasmas from 21 patients (determined by platelet aggregation assays) were studied. Normal donor platelet-rich plasmas (PRP) were incubated (1 minute) with either saline solution or 3 microg/ml of c7E3. Platelet-poor plasma from patients with HAAb and one of three sources of heparin (25 microl, 10 U/ml; porcine heparin, bovine heparin, and low molecular weight heparin [enoxaparin]) were added to the PRP mixture. Aggregation was determined using a platelet aggregometer by measuring time to aggregation, the slope of the aggregation curve, and the percent change in optical density.

RESULTS

Platelet aggregation occured in 100%, 100%, and 95% of the saline solution incubations exposed to porcine heparin, bovine heparin, and enoxaparin, respectively. Incubation with c7E3 caused 100% inhibition of platelet aggregation in plasma exposed to porcine heparin, bovine heparin, and enoxaparin. The optical density curves obtained from the ELISA, which were dependent on the binding of HAAb to heparin, were not significantly different when c7E3 was compared to buffer alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, c7E3, inhibits HAAb-induced platelet aggregation via a mechanism that does not appear to interfere with the binding between heparin and HAAb. Clinical trials are warranted to assess whether GP IIb/IIIa antagonists may allow patients with HAAb to safely receive heparin.