Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine

Historical evolution of robot-assisted cardiac surgery: a 25-year journey

Many patients and surgeons today favor the least invasive access to an operative site. The adoption of robot-assisted cardiac surgery has been slow, but now has come to fruition. The development of modern surgical robots took surgeons close collaboration with mechanical, electrical, and optical engineers. Moreover, the necessary project funding required entrepreneurs, federal grants, and venture capital. Non-robotic minimally invasive cardiac surgery paved the way to the application of surgical robots by making changes in operative approaches, instruments, visioning modalities, cardiopulmonary perfusion techniques, and especially surgeons' attitudes. In this article, the serial development of robot-assisted cardiac surgery is detailed from the beginning and through clinical application. Included are references to the historical and most recent clinical series that have given us the evidence that robot-assisted cardiac surgery is safe and provides excellent outcomes. To this end, in many institutions these procedures now have become a new standard of care. This evolution reflects Sir Isaac Newton's famous 1676 quote when referring to Rene Descartes, "If have seen further [sic] than others, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants".

[Robotic-assisted surgery: yesterday, today, tomorrow]

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of development of «robotic surgery» on the basis of historical prerequisites, review of the possibilities of the new Senhance robotic surgical system and determination of further perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective group of 51 patients with surgical pathology who underwent surgical interventions using the new Senhance robotic system was analyzed. The study included 51 patients. Robot-assisted cholecystectomy was performed in 20 patients, 31 patients underwent robotic transabdominal preperitoneal plastic surgery.

RESULTS

A short-term analysis of intraoperative and early postoperative data showed the safety of using the Senhance robotic complex for the patient. The ergonomics of this system contributes to significantly less fatigue of the surgeon during the operation, increasing its efficiency and safety.

CONCLUSION

The emergence of competitive robotic systems contributes to the dynamic development of robotic surgery, which in turn will lead to a reduction in the cost of these technologies in the future. Innovative solutions used in modern robotic complexes are based on the principles of machine learning, which in due time will make the «robot surgeon» not just a tool, but a full-fledged member of the operating team.

Future Platforms of Robotic Surgery

Among the various robotic devices that exist for urologic surgery, the most common are synergistic telemanipulator systems. Several have achieved clinical feasibility and have been licensed for use in humans: the standard da Vinci, Avatera, Hinotori, Revo-i, Senhance, Versius, and Surgenius. Handheld and hands-on synergistic systems are also clinically relevant for use in urologic surgeries, including minimally invasive and endoscopic approaches. Future trends of robotic innovation include an exploration of more robust haptic systems that offer kinesthetic and tactile feedback; miniaturization and microrobotics; enhanced visual feedback with greater magnification and higher fidelity detail; and autonomous robots.

Telemedicine in cardiovascular surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and our experience

Objective

The SAR‐COV‐2 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect on the UK's healthcare systems. To reduce spread of the virus, elective treatments and surgeries have been postponed or canceled. There has been a rise in the use of telemedicine (TM) as an alternative way to carry outpatient consultations. This systematic review aims to evaluate the extent to which TM may be able to support cardiac and vascular surgery patients in the COVID‐19 era.

Methods

We looked into how TM can support the management of patients via triaging, preoperative, and postoperative care. Evaluations targeted the clinical effectiveness of common TM methods and the feasibility of applying those methods in the UK during this pandemic.

Results

Several studies have published their evidence on the benefit of TM and its benefit during COVID‐19, the data related to cardiovascular surgery and how this will impact future practice of this speciality is emerging and yet larger studies with appropriate timing of outcomes to be published.

Conclusion

Overall, the use of virtual consultations and remote monitoring is feasible and best placed to support these patients via triaging and postoperative monitoring. However, TM can be limited by the need of sophisticated technological requirement and patients’ educational and know‐how computer literacy level.

Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged.

METHODS

A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review.

CONCLUSION

We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline.

Patient-centered wound teleconsultation for cutaneous wounds: a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of patient-centered teleconsultation for various cutaneous wounds by using store-and-forward technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2011 to November 2011, 53 patients with various wound conditions were enrolled in this study. The patients took their own wound images shortly before face-to-face consultations with a plastic surgeon, and the images were sent via e-mail to another 3 remote plastic surgeons along with brief medical information. All 4 surgeons completed a standard questionnaire individually, which addressed questions regarding the presence of wound conditions (gangrene, necrosis, erythema, and cellulitis/infection), as well as suggested clinical treatment with antibiotics and debridement. The evaluations were compared among the 3 remote surgeons as well as the remote and onsite surgeons.

RESULTS

The 53 wounds included in our study exhibited different causative mechanisms and locations on the body. The concordances between the remote and onsite surgeons were 92%, 79%, 83%, and 85% regarding the presence of gangrene, necrosis, erythema, and cellulitis/infection, respectively. The agreement rates regarding the treatment suggestion with antibiotic use and debridement between the remote surgeons and the onsite surgeon were both 83%. The remote surgeons reported high specificity, at least 84%, in all parameters of wound descriptions or treatment suggestions.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient-centered teleconsultation system based on store-and-forward technology is a feasible tool for wound management, and it shows promises in future clinical applications by decreasing clinic visits.

Surgical Robots

Information technology and robotics have been integrated into interventional medicine for over 25 years. Their primary aim has always been to provide patient benefits through increased precision, safety, and minimal invasiveness. Nevertheless, robotic devices should allow for sophisticated treatment methods that are not possible by other means. Several hundreds of different surgical robot prototypes have been developed, while only a handful passed clearance procedures, and was released to the market. This is mostly due to the difficulties associated with medical device development and approval, especially in those cases when some form of manipulation and automation is involved. This chapter is intended to present major aspects of surgical robotic prototyping and current trends through the analysis of various international projects. It spans across the phases from system planning, to development, validation, and clearance.

Surgical Robots

Information technology and robotics have been integrated into interventional medicine for over 25 years. Their primary aim has always been to provide patient benefits through increased precision, safety, and minimal invasiveness. Nevertheless, robotic devices should allow for sophisticated treatment methods that are not possible by other means. Several hundreds of different surgical robot prototypes have been developed, while only a handful passed clearance procedures, and was released to the market. This is mostly due to the difficulties associated with medical device development and approval, especially in those cases when some form of manipulation and automation is involved. This chapter is intended to present major aspects of surgical robotic prototyping and current trends through the analysis of various international projects. It spans across the phases from system planning, to development, validation, and clearance.

Robotics in endoscopic surgery: can mechanical manipulators provide a more simple solution for the problem of limited degrees of freedom?

Robotic manipulators for endoscopic surgery have been developed on an experimental basis from the early 1990s and are now in clinical use. The main motivation to apply robotics technology to endoscopic surgery is to re-establish six degrees of freedom (DoF) of motion at the tip of the instrument. The cost–benefit ratio of these devices is still unclear. Although the products offered today are based on excellent technology and show a high functionality, most hospitals still hesitate to invest in robotic manipulators for fiscal reasons. For a significant number of procedures, especially in non-microsurgical disciplines, the functionality offered by robotic manipulators is not required, although the procedures would profit from instrumentation with 6 DoF. Mechanical manipulators with 6 DoF, but without computerised control, may be the right solution for these procedures. We have developed a workplace solution for endoscopic surgery that involves mechanical instrument-guiding systems and manipulators that offer 6 DoF, but use a significantly simplified technology at low cost. Further studies will need to show whether these mechanical manipulators answer the needs of the surgeon and offer an affordable alternative to robotic manipulators in surgical areas where microsurgical manipulations are not dominant.

Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

Background

Robot-assisted surgical systems have been introduced to improve the outcome of minimally invasive surgery. These systems also have the potential to improve ergonomics for the surgeon during endoscopic surgery. This study aimed to compare the user’s mental and physical comfort in performing standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques. Surgical performance also was analyzed.

Methods

In this study, 16 surgically inexperienced participants performed three tasks using both a robotic system and standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Distress was measured using questionnaires and an ambulatory monitoring system. Surgical performance was analyzed with time-action analysis.

Results

The physiologic parameters (p = 0.000), the questionnaires (p = 0.000), and the time-action analysis (p = 0.001) favored the robot-assisted group in terms of lower stress load and an increase in work efficiency.

Conclusion

In this experimental setup, the use of a robot-assisted surgical system was of value in both cognitive and physical stress reduction. Robotic assistance also demonstrated improvement in performance.

Robotics in colorectal surgery: telemonitoring and telerobotics

Surgery has just passed through the laparoscopic surgery revolution, with validation of the advantages for the patient evaluated painstakingly; however, laparoscopy is a transition phase to fully information-based surgery, which only can be accomplished when hand motions are converted to information through robotic surgery systems. The main advantage is using such systems to integrate the entire surgical process. The components that will allow such a transition exist in other industries that use robotics, so it is more a matter of applying these engineering principles to surgery, rather than inventing new technologies. Robotics cannot only improve the performance of surgery, but is providing access to surgical expertise in remote and underserved areas through telementoring, teleconsultation, and telesurgery. Colorectal surgeons should seize the opportunity to begin to use surgical robotic systems in those niche areas and procedures that have proven to be of significant benefit to the patient and are cost-effective. Over time, with the development of even more advanced systems it will become more advantageous to use robotics on a routine basis.

Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model

BACKGROUND

Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced surgery improves laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery through tremor filtration, motion scaling, articulation, and improved ergonomics. Surgeons perform many open cases under magnification that magnifies the tremor present in all surgeons' hands, so the tremor filtration and motion scaling of robotic surgery may improve microsurgery. Our goal was to compare microvascular anastomoses performed with a robot-enhanced technique with a standard technique.

METHODS

We performed end-to-end anastomoses in 1-mm rat femoral arteries with interrupted 10-0 suture. We compared the anastomotic time, patency, and leak rates between traditional microsurgery techniques (by hand) and a robot-enhanced technique using the Zeus robotic surgery system (Computer Motion, Goleta, California). The surgeon used an operative microscope for visualization in both techniques.

RESULTS

We performed 30 anastomoses by hand and 31 with Zeus. We observed a remarkable degree of tremor filtration in the robot-enhanced cases. Anastomotic times for both techniques demonstrated a learning curve. Anastomoses done by hand (mean time, 17.2 minutes) were significantly faster than those done with Zeus (mean time, 27.6 minutes) (P = 0.0006). All anastomoses from both groups were patent, and none leaked after 3 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The Zeus system is effective at performing complex, open, microsurgery tasks in vivo. There was no measurable benefit from the remarkable tremor filtration and motion scaling offered by robot-enhanced surgery.

Teleconsultation with the mobile camera-phone in digital soft-tissue injury: a feasibility study

The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of teleconsultation using a mobile camera-phone to evaluate the severity of digital soft-tissue injury and to triage the injury with regard to management recommendations. With a built-in 110,000-pixel digital camera, pictures of the injured digit(s) or radiograph were taken by surgical residents in the emergency room and transmitted to another camera-phone to be viewed by the remote consultant surgeon. A brief medical and trauma history of each patient was relayed also by mobile phone. The consultant surgeon then reviewed all of these patients in the emergency room shortly after the initial telemedicine referral. Separate triaging for each digital injury into three groups was recorded during remote teleconsultation and according to actual treatment by the attending surgeon as follows: group I, the injury could be managed with conservative treatment, such as secondary intention wound healing, or primary closure with or without bone shortening; group II, skin grafting or local flap coverage was required for management of the injury; and group III, microsurgery such as replantation or free flap coverage was necessary to deal with the injury. Later, triaging was also performed individually by three junior plastic residents according to image review and patient referral information. Teleconsultation through a mobile camera-phone was performed for 45 patients with injuries of 81 digits from January to May of 2003. Of these 81 digital injuries, there were 12 cases (15 percent) where disagreement of triaging occurred between the teleconsultation and the actual treatment by the attending surgeon. In image reviewing, there was 79 percent sensitivity and 71 percent specificity in remote diagnosis of the skin defect and 76 percent sensitivity and 75 percent specificity in remote identification of the bone exposure regarding the concordance of opinions of all three surgeons; there was significant discordance in triaging in 20 cases (25 percent), and the difference in triaging was partly attributed to the inability to show instances of tiny exposed digital bone or tendon in some cases under the low-resolution digital image and the situation of a bloody oozing wound. In some cases, the difficulty in evaluating the probability of primary closure of severely avulsed skin edges or the probability of executing replantation for finger amputation also contributed to different triaging outcomes. Two neglected diagnoses of transected digital nerves were found and influenced triaging, highlighting the importance of on-site physical examination during teleconsultation. The telemedicine system using a mobile camera-phone based on the global system for mobile communication is feasible and valuable for early diagnosis and triaging of digital soft-tissue injury in emergency cases, with on-line verbal communication and review of the transmitted captured image. This system has the advantages of ease of use, low cost, high portability, and mobility. With advances in hardware for digital imaging and transmission technology and the development of the third-generation advanced mobile phone system in the foreseeable future, this system has potential for future applications in telemedicine and telecare.

Teleconsultation by Using the Mobile Camera Phone for Remote Management of the Extremity Wound

To assess the feasibility of remote management of extremity wound by using a mobile camera phone to transfer clinical images and online communication, teleconsultations were carried out on 60 patients between January and August 2003 for 82 extremity wounds presented to the emergency room between residents and consultant plastic surgeons. A questionnaire about wound descriptors (gangrene, necrosis, erythema, and cellulitis/infection), as well as clinical opinions regarding treatment with antibiotics or debridement, was filled out. In this study, 3 surgeons were able to make 80%, 76%, 66%, and 74% agreement, respectively, in the remote diagnosis regarding presence of gangrene, necrosis, erythema, and cellulitis/infection. Recognition of gangrene had the highest agreement percent (80%), sensitivity (85%), and specificity (93%). There were 68% to 90% of image sets that could be made with equivalent diagnoses of wound descriptors and 83% of wounds managed as per the remote treatment recommendation regarding whether to use antibiotics or to perform debridement. The preliminary results showed that the camera phone is valuable and bears potential for remote management of the extremity wound.

The telecommunication revolution in the medical field: present applications and future perspective

In the present review, we analyze the achievements of telecommunication innovations in the medical field focusing on patient care and medical-education aspects. In this regard, the telecommunication revolution has offered medical professionals the possibility to transmit information of any sort zeroing transmission time latency and annihilating spatial distances. Although telemedicine is still in its infancy, multiple applications of this science have already been successfully tested. As an example, robotically mediated telesurgery has it made possible for surgeons to operate standing at a considerable distance from the operating table without even touching or directly seeing the surgical field. Moreover, medical education and medical consulting have acquired new and wider ranges of applicability thanks to the introduction of teleproctoring, telementoring, and teleconsulting. Finally, in the very near future, telepresence surgery will permit "virtual" operations on patients where surgeons can project their manual dexterity, psychomotor skills, and problem-solving ability to remote locations. In this context, telemedicine will support a more equal distribution of medical knowledge and promote excellence in patients' care even in the most disadvantaged environments.

Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgery systems were introduced to overcome the disadvantages of endoscopic surgery. The goal of this study was to assess whether robot assistance could support endoscopic surgeons in performing a complex endoscopic task.

METHODS

Five experienced endoscopic surgeons performed end-to-end anastomosis on post-mortem porcine small intestine. The procedure was performed both with standard endoscopic techniques and with robotic assistance (da Vinci system, Intuitive Surgical, Sunny vale, CA). It was performed in three different working directions with a horizontal, vertical, and diagonal position of the bowel. Anastomosis time, number of stitches, knots, time per stitch, suture ruptures, and the number of stitch errors were recorded. Also, an action analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Anastomosis time, number of stitches, and the number of knots did not differ significantly between the two groups. The time needed per stitch was significantly shorter with robot assistance (81.4 sec/stitch vs 95.9 sec/stitch, p = 0.005). More suture ruptures occurred in the robot group (0 (0-2) vs 0 (0-0), p = 0.003). In the standard group more stitch errors were found (2 (0-5) vs 0 (0-3), p = 0.017). These results were comparable for three different working directions. The action analysis, however, showed significant benefits of robotic assistance. The benefits were greatest in a vertical bowel position.

CONCLUSION

Robot assistance might offer added value to experienced endoscopic surgeons in the performance of a small-bowel anastomosis in an experimental setup, even though total anastomosis time could not be demonstrated to be shorter and some suture tears occurred due to the lack of force feedback.

Incorporating robotics into an open-heart program

The above described clinical series show that after a careful and thorough training program and stepwise introduction of surgical telemanipulation systems, application of telemanipulations is safe and shows acceptable results. Still, OR times are longer than for conventional procedures, and the operation is demanding, and expensive. The main shortcoming is that the procedure is only suitable for a highly selected patient population. However, despite all the clinical experience gathered in various centers, this technique is still evolving and in its beginning. There are some very promising developments that will improve the benefit of telemanipulators. For the first time, the separation of the surgeon from the surgical field facilitates training of surgeons on simulators. This might lead to a higher standard of surgical performance. Progress in sensor technology will make tactile-force feedback available, and new 3 D-visualization systems are designed to provide a better depth perception and higher resolution of the endoscopic image. Virtual stabilizing systems will enable robotic systems to operate on a virtual arrested heart without the need for CPB or mechanical stabilizers. These and other research topics summarized under the term augmented reality will enhance the natural senses and abilities of the surgeon. More and more, automatization will find its way into the OR. Preoperatively collected data about the patient's anatomy will be used to create safety margins, the robotic system will allow for the surgeon's movements, and instruments will be able to find their way to the surgical site without remote control. Because a stepwise approach has led to the clinical results that we and others have now achieved, it is the basis for further step-by-step development of the application of telemanipulation systems in coronary artery bypass grafting, and possibly other endoscopic procedures in cardiac surgery.

Robotic surgery: from past to future—a personal journey

A review of the history of robotic surgery--from its beginnings in a collaboration of engineers, computer scientists, and a plastic surgeon from Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and the NASA-Ames Research Center to the next generation of systems on the drawing board in the Department of Defense--provides a rich and colorful look at the author's participation in its development. Although Dr. Satava has participated in the development of other systems (orthopedic, ophthalmologic, and neurosurgical) that have contributed to the current distribution of robotic, computer-aided, and image-guided surgical systems, this article focuses on the development of the telemanipulation systems used for thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic surgery. Based upon emerging technologies, speculation is provided on the next generation of systems.

Robotic renal and adrenal surgery

Technology today is evolving at a dramatic rate. Quantum development has occurred in the area of robotic enhancement technology (RET) in the last decade. Incorporation of RET with advanced telecommunication technologies is a recent integration in medicine, with growth potential and application in the delivery of modern health care. There remain, however, many areas which need to be further improved and evaluated before clinical applications of the robot become accepted in adrenal and renal minimally invasive surgery.

Telemedicine in surgery

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine is influencing surgical training, allows mentoring, proctoring and teleconferencing, and is increasingly being applied to carry out remote surgical procedures. A systematic review of the telemedicine systems available, along with a critical appraisal of their application, potential and limitations in the surgical field, has been undertaken.

METHOD

Medline, Ovid and internet searches were carried out using the keywords 'telesurgery', 'telepresence surgery' and 'telemedicine and surgery', along with hand searches of the two peer-reviewed telesurgery journals.

RESULTS

Telementoring and teleconferencing have been used widely for surgical teaching and training. Two clinical telesurgery systems are currently available and have been a trial in patients undergoing a variety of operations including cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass, prostatectomy and gastroplasty. Most studies have reported successful outcomes but with prolonged operating times. In 2002 the first long-distance telesurgery procedure was successfully performed.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine has huge potential to alter surgical practice but improvements are required in telesurgical technology with respect to tactile feedback, instrumentation, telecommunication speed and availability. Issues of liability, legislation, cost and benefit require clarification. The future of telemedicine in surgery may lie in facilitating complex minimally invasive techniques.

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of a benign mediastinal neurogenic tumor: technical note

OBJECTIVE

Robotic surgery systems were introduced recently with the objective of enhancing the dexterity and view during procedures that use a videoscope. The first case report of robot-assisted thoracoscopic removal of a benign neurogenic tumor in the thorax is presented.

METHODS

A 46-year-old woman presented with a history of paravertebral pain. A chest x-ray revealed a left paravertebral mass. A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed a well-encapsulated mass that was suspected to be a neuroma at the level of T8-T9, separate from vascular structures, without extension in the foramina, and without a spinal canal component.

RESULTS

A left robot-assisted thoracoscopic resection of the tumor was performed. After placement of six trocars, the tumor was carefully dissected and removed through one of the trocar openings. The histopathological findings revealed an ancient schwannoma.

CONCLUSION

This case report demonstrates the feasibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic extirpation of a thoracic neurogenic tumor. Robot-assisted surgery may prove to be of additional value in challenging thoracoscopic surgery, such as the delicate surgical removal of benign neurogenic tumors, because of the support in manipulation and visualization during videoscopic interventions.

Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery

The introduction of laparoscopic surgery offers clear advantages to patients; to surgeons, it presents the challenge of learning new remote operating techniques quite different from traditional operating. Telemanipulation, introduced in the late 1990s, was a major advance in overcoming the reduced dexterity introduced by laparoscopic techniques. This paper reviews the development of robotic systems in surgery and their role in the operating room of the future.

Survey of Resident Training in Robotic Surgery

Robotics has been recognized as a major driving force in the advancement of minimally invasive surgery. However, the extent to which General Surgery residents are being trained to use robotic technology has never been assessed. A survey was sent to program directors of accredited General Surgery training programs to determine the prevalence and application of robotics in surgical training programs. Responses were tabulated and analyzed. Thirty-three per cent indicated interest in minimally invasive surgery. Twelve per cent of responders have used robotics in their practice, and 65 per cent felt robotics will play an important role in the future of General Surgery. Currently residents from 14 per cent of the responding training programs have exposure to robotic technology, and residents from an additional 4 per cent of these programs have limited didactic exposure. Program directors from 23 per cent of responding programs identified plans to incorporate robotics into their program. Robotics have been shown to make standard endoscopic surgical procedures more efficient and cost-effective as well as allowing a variety of procedures that were only possible with conventional methods to be completed with minimally invasive techniques. This new technology promises to be a large part of the future of surgery and as such deserves more attention in the training of General Surgery residents.

Robot-assisted microsurgery: a feasibility study in the rat

OBJECTIVE

Telerobotic surgery is a novel technology that can improve a surgeon's manual dexterity as well as the results achieved with microsurgical procedures.

METHODS

A prototype Robot-Assisted MicroSurgery (RAMS) microdexterity enhancement system developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and MicroDexterity Systems, Inc., was tested in 10 rats. Carotid arteriotomies were created and closed using either the RAMS system or conventional microsurgical techniques. The time required, the technical quality (vessel patency and suture line integrity), the error rate, and subjective difficulty were compared.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed using the RAMS system to manipulate the vessel but not to hold the needle or place the sutures. The precision, technical quality, and error rate of telerobotic surgery were similar to those of conventional techniques. However, the use of the RAMS system was associated with a twofold increase in the length of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Surgery using a microdexterity enhancement system, or RAMS prototype, is feasible. With further development, such as a stereotelevisualization and haptic feedback system, this system could be used for telerobotic surgery in neurosurgical practice.

Telesurgery. Remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy

In comparison to open surgery, laparoscopy results in less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, more rapid return to the work force, a better cosmetic result, and a lower incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. These advantages are indisputable when comparing large series for cholecystectomy and smaller series for pelvic lymph node dissection, nephrectomy, and bladder neck suspension in experienced hands. Urologists have an obligation to explore the application of these methods to urologic disease and to adjust the standard of care accordingly. Several barriers to the expansion of urologic laparoscopic surgery exist. The experience in extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedures is limited when compared with the data on cholecystectomy. These procedures are technically complex and demand advanced laparoscopic skills and familiarity with laparoscopic anatomy. The steep learning curve translates into long operative times and an unacceptably high rate of complications for inexperienced laparoscopic surgeons. Most practicing urologists have no formal training in advanced laparoscopy, and no formal credentialing guidelines exist. Telesurgical technology may provide one solution to this problem. Through telesurgical mentoring, less experienced surgeons with basic laparoscopic skills could receive training in advanced techniques from a world expert without the need for travel. These systems could also be used to proctor laparoscopic cases for credentialing purposes and to provide a more uniform standard of care. This review has outlined some of the exciting progress made in the field of telesurgery over the past 10 years and described some of the technical and legal obstacles that remain to be surmounted. During the 1990s, urologists were at the forefront of innovation in remote telepresence surgery. As the scope of minimally invasive urologic surgery expands during the first few decades of the twenty-first century, telesurgical mentoring should have an increasingly important role.

Preparing surgeons for the 21st century. Implications of advanced technologies

An entire spectrum of advanced technologies and concepts has been presented, from the new clinical applications to highly speculative possibilities. Not all of these technologies will survive the long process to clinical usefulness, but those that do may revolutionize surgery. With such change comes the ethical and moral responsibility to consider them not only in the light of improvement of patient care but also in their impact on society as a whole. If the remarkable rate of change of the past 2 decades continues, it is impossible to conceive of the role of future surgeons. Thus, to be prepared, surgeons must have an open mind, a willingness to consider and evaluate new directions, and the honesty and courage to change when a new approach is proven to be of value. A prepared mind is an open mind.

Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids

Within a Dutch research program on minimally invasive surgery, a large literature survey has been carried out. This article describes the state of the art in research on manipulation in laparoscopy. It gives an overview of factors impeding the surgeon and technical developments designed to overcome these problems. Starting from the year 1991, a large number of journals, proceedings, patents, and books have been consulted. The survey was completed with a thorough MEDLINE search. The impeding effects have been subdivided into two groups: transformation of spatial and grasping movements of the hand. The article gives an overview of these effects and of supporting aids that have been developed. The studies show that many aids are based on a technology-driven rather than a clinically-driven approach. The development of simple instruments that can be used for a large range of tasks instead of only one is still a very important topic of research.