[Effect of bronchial drainage on the improvement in gas exchange observed in ventral decubitus in ARDS]

Prone Position after Liberation from Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19 Respiratory Failure

DESIGN

This is a retrospective case series describing the feasibility and tolerability of postextubation prone positioning (PEPP) and its impact on physiologic parameters in a tertiary intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Setting and Patients. This study was conducted on patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure hospitalized in a tertiary Intensive Care Unit at Surrey Memorial Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Measurements and Results. We did not find prior reports of PEPP following prolonged intubation in the literature. Four patients underwent a total of 13 PEPP sessions following liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation. Each patient underwent a median of 3 prone sessions (IQR: 2, 4.25) lasting a median of 1.5 hours (IQR: 1.2, 2.1). PEPP sessions were associated with a reduction in median oxygen requirements, patient respiratory rate, and reintubation rate. The sessions were well tolerated by patients, nursing, and the allied health team.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel practice of PEPP after liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure is feasible and well tolerated, and may be associated with favourable clinical outcomes including improvement in oxygenation and respiratory rate and a low rate of reintubation. Larger prospective studies of PEPP are warranted.

Chronic REM-sleep deprivation induced laryngopharyngeal reflux in rats: A preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of chronic REM-sleep deprivation with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and its mechanism.

METHODS

Forty healthy male SD rats (body weight 250-280 g) were randomly divided into four groups. The first three ones were test group, which underwent REM-sleep deprivation with different duration of time by modified multiplatform water surface method. The last group was the control one having normal sleep. All the animals were performed Dx-pH monitoring when finishing sleep deprivation, and sacrificed to study the gastric residual rate (GRR) and small intestine peristalsis (SPR) rate by charcoal meal method.

RESULTS

At prone position, the reflux incidence in the test groups fairly increased with the duration of sleep deprivation (p<0.05). The total number of reflux episodes at prone position in the test group rats with 3 months duration of sleep deprivation was significantly increased compared with that in the control ones (p<0.05). GRR in rats experiencing sleep deficiency for different duration all reduced significantly when compared to the control group (p<0.05). GRR and SPR presented continuous decline tendency with the duration of sleep deprivation (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested that chronic sleep deficiency could cause LPR in rats, which might result from the uncoordinated digestive tract motility caused by dysfunction of central nervous system after chronic REM-sleep deprivation. Our results implied that chronic REM-sleep deprivation might be one of the causes of LPR. Addressing sleep problems might help to decrease the prevalence of LPR and enhance its treatment efficacy.

Décubitus ventral et kinésithérapie respiratoire : y a-t-il une indication ? Description d’un cas clinique

Contexte : Le décubitus ventral (DV) est appliqué dans un objectif de recrutement alvéolaire, dans le cadre de syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë (SDRA). Le DV mobilise parfois des sécrétions bronchiques, interrogeant l’intérêt d’une kinésithérapie de désencombrement.

Matériel et méthode : Une femme de 43 ans, myopathe de Steinert, est hospitalisée pour une insuffisance hépatique aiguë. À j3, elle présente une pneumopathie d’inhalation, suivie d’un SDRA. Le positionnement en DV est réalisé, mobilisant des sécrétions bronchiques. Une séance de kinésithérapie respiratoire est alors appliquée.

Résultats : Après la mise en DVet la séance de kinésithérapie, la quantité de sécrétions recueillies est de 2,4 g. Le rapport entre la pression partielle en oxygène et la fraction inspirée en oxygène (PaO2/FiO2) s’améliore, passant de 64 à 180 au bout de 11 heures de DV. La pression motrice et la pression de plateau sont restées inférieures aux valeurs délétères au cours de la séance de kinésithérapie, celle-ci n’ayant pas généré d’hypoxie pendant ou après la séance.

Discussion : Le positionnement en DV libère les parties postérieures des poumons, permettant une amélioration du rapport PaO2/FiO2. La clairance mucociliaire a été améliorée, mais il n’est pas possible de discriminer les effets du DVou de la kinésithérapie. Dans la littérature, la kinésithérapie respiratoire n’a pas montré son efficacité pour ces patients, même si aucun effet délétère n’a été observé à travers ce cas clinique. Les risques de dé-recrutement alvéolaire restent importants.

Conclusion : Il est difficile de recommander en pratique courante la kinésithérapie respiratoire de désencombrement en DV. Des études ultérieures sont nécessaires, dans un objectif de recherche centré plutôt sur le recrutement alvéolaire que sur le désencombrement, chez ces patients fragiles.

Inflammatory lung injury in rabbits: effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the prone position

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects that prone and supine positioning during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) have on oxygenation and lung inflammation, histological injury, and oxidative stress in a rabbit model of acute lung injury (ALI).

METHODS

Thirty male Norfolk white rabbits were induced to ALI by tracheal saline lavage (30 mL/kg, 38°C). The injury was induced during conventional mechanical ventilation, and ALI was considered confirmed when a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 100 mmHg was reached. Rabbits were randomly divided into two groups: HFOV in the supine position (SP group, n = 15); and HFOV with prone positioning (PP group, n = 15). For HFOV, the mean airway pressure was initially set at 16 cmH2O. At 30, 60, and 90 min after the start of the HFOV protocol, the mean airway pressure was reduced to 14, 12, and 10 cmH2O, respectively. At 120 min, the animals were returned to or remained in the supine position for an extra 30 min. We evaluated oxygenation indices and histological lung injury scores, as well as TNF-α levels in BAL fluid and lung tissue.

RESULTS

After ALI induction, all of the animals showed significant hypoxemia, decreased respiratory system compliance, decreased oxygenation, and increased mean airway pressure in comparison with the baseline values. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, at any of the time points evaluated, in terms of the PaO2 or oxygenation index. However, TNF-α levels in BAL fluid were significantly lower in the PP group than in the SP group, as were histological lung injury scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Prone positioning appears to attenuate inflammatory and histological lung injury during HFOV in rabbits with ALI.

Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based review

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a syndrome with heterogeneous underlying pathological processes. It represents a common clinical problem in intensive care unit patients and it is characterized by high mortality. The mainstay of treatment for ARDS is lung protective ventilation with low tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure sufficient for alveolar recruitment. Prone positioning is a supplementary strategy available in managing patients with ARDS. It was first described 40 years ago and it proves to be in alignment with two major ARDS pathophysiological lung models; the "sponge lung" - and the "shape matching" -model. Current evidence strongly supports that prone positioning has beneficial effects on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, lung protection and hemodynamics as it redistributes transpulmonary pressure, stress and strain throughout the lung and unloads the right ventricle. The factors that individually influence the time course of alveolar recruitment and the improvement in oxygenation during prone positioning have not been well characterized. Although patients' response to prone positioning is quite variable and hard to predict, large randomized trials and recent meta-analyses show that prone position in conjunction with a lung-protective strategy, when performed early and in sufficient duration, may improve survival in patients with ARDS. This pathophysiology-based review and recent clinical evidence strongly support the use of prone positioning in the early management of severe ARDS systematically and not as a rescue maneuver or a last-ditch effort.

The Japanese guidelines for the management of sepsis

This is a guideline for the management of sepsis, developed by the Sepsis Registry Committee of The Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) launched in March 2007. This guideline was developed on the basis of evidence-based medicine and focuses on unique treatments in Japan that have not been included in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (SSCG), as well as treatments that are viewed differently in Japan and in Western countries. Although the methods in this guideline conform to the 2008 SSCG, the Japanese literature and the results of the Sepsis Registry Survey, which was performed twice by the Sepsis Registry Committee in intensive care units (ICUs) registered with JSICM, are also referred. This is the first and original guideline for sepsis in Japan and is expected to be properly used in daily clinical practice.

This article is translated from Japanese, originally published as “The Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis” in the Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (J Jpn Soc Intensive Care Med), 2013; 20:124–73. The original work is at http://dx.doi.org/10.3918/jsicm.20.124.

Enteral Nutrition in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation in a Prone Position

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the prone position (PP) could have an increased risk for feeding intolerance. However, the available evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited and contradictory.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility and efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) support and its associated complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in PP.

METHODS

Prospective observational study including 34 mechanically ventilated intensive care patients who were turned to the prone position over a 3-year period. End points related to efficacy and safety of EN support were studied.

RESULTS

In total, more than 1200 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit over a period of 3 years. Of these, 34 received mechanical ventilation in PP. The mean days under EN were 24.7 ± 12.3. Mean days under EN in the supine position were significantly higher than in PP (21.1 vs 3.6; P < .001), but there were no significant differences in gastric residual volume adjusted per day of EN (126.6 vs 189.2; P = .054) as well as diet volume ratio (94.1% vs 92.8%; P = .21). No significant differences in high gastric residual events per day of EN (0.06 vs 0.09; P = .39), vomiting per day of EN (0.016 vs 0.03; P = .53), or diet regurgitation per day of EN (0 vs 0.04; P = .051) were found.

CONCLUSIONS

EN in critically ill patients with severe hypoxemia receiving mechanical ventilation in PP is feasible, safe, and not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

[A new complication related to prolonged prone position: a masseter muscle haematoma]

We report a case of a 54-year-old man who underwent an prolonged spinal osteosynthesis complicated by a masseter muscle compressive ischaemia and haematoma in the early postoperative period. A special attention of the body compressive points in particular of the face, in association with an horseshoe's headstall, would have probably lead to avoid this complication in this risk factors patient.

Prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): when and how?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe form of respiratory failure. It remains one of the most devastating conditions in the intensive care unit. Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure is a cornerstone therapy for ARDS patients. One adjuvant alternative is to place the patient in a prone position. Since it was first described in 1976, prone positioning has been safely employed to improve oxygenation in many patients with ARDS. Prone positioning may also minimize secondary lung injury induced by mechanical ventilation, although this benefit has not been investigated as extensively, despite its potential. In spite of a strong physiological justification, prone positioning is still not widely accepted as an adjunct therapy in ARDS patients and it is only used regularly in only 10% of ICUs. This may be explained in part by the reluctance to change position, risks and unclear effects on relevant outcomes. In this paper, we review all aspects of prone positioning, from the pathophysiology to the clinical studies of patient outcome, and we also discuss the latest controversies surrounding this treatment.

Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prone position ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) improves oxygenation but not survival, except possibly when AHRF is severe.

OBJECTIVE

To determine effects of prone versus supine ventilation in AHRF and severe hypoxemia [partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2))/inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO(2)) <100 mmHg] compared with moderate hypoxemia (100 mmHg < or = PaO(2)/FiO(2) < or = 300 mmHg).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (to November 2009) and conference proceedings.

METHODS

Two authors independently selected and extracted data from parallel-group randomized controlled trials comparing prone with supine ventilation in mechanically ventilated adults or children with AHRF. Trialists provided subgroup data. The primary outcome was hospital mortality in patients with AHRF and PaO(2)/FiO(2) <100 mmHg. Meta-analyses used study-level random-effects models.

RESULTS

Ten trials (N = 1,867 patients) met inclusion criteria; most patients had acute lung injury. Methodological quality was relatively high. Prone ventilation reduced mortality in patients with PaO(2)/FiO(2) <100 mmHg [risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.96; p = 0.01; seven trials, N = 555] but not in patients with PaO(2)/FiO(2) > or =100 mmHg (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.22; p = 0.36; seven trials, N = 1,169). Risk ratios differed significantly between subgroups (interaction p = 0.012). Post hoc analysis demonstrated statistically significant improved mortality in the more hypoxemic subgroup and significant differences between subgroups using a range of PaO(2)/FiO(2) thresholds up to approximately 140 mmHg. Prone ventilation improved oxygenation by 27-39% over the first 3 days of therapy but increased the risks of pressure ulcers (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.44), endotracheal tube obstruction (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.24-2.01), and chest tube dislodgement (RR 3.14, 95% CI 1.02-9.69). There was no statistical between-trial heterogeneity for most clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with severe hypoxemia. Given associated risks, this approach should not be routine in all patients with AHRF, but may be considered for severely hypoxemic patients.

Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation in the prone position is used to improve oxygenation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We sought to determine the effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on mortality, oxygenation, duration of ventilation and adverse events in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

METHODS

In this systematic review we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Science Citation Index Expanded for articles published from database inception to February 2008. We also conducted extensive manual searches and contacted experts. We extracted physiologic data and clinically relevant outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials that enrolled a total of 1559 patients met our inclusion criteria. Overall methodologic quality was good. In 10 of the trials (n = 1486) reporting this outcome, we found that prone positioning did not reduce mortality among hypoxemic patients (risk ratio [RR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.09; p = 0.52). The lack of effect of ventilation in the prone position on mortality was similar in trials of prolonged prone positioning and in patients with acute lung injury. In 8 of the trials (n = 633), the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen on day 1 was 34% higher among patients in the prone position than among those who remained supine (p < 0.001); these results were similar in 4 trials on day 2 and in 5 trials on day 3. In 9 trials (n = 1206), the ratio in patients assigned to the prone group remained 6% higher the morning after they returned to the supine position compared with patients assigned to the supine group (p = 0.07). Results were quantitatively similar but statistically significant in 7 trials on day 2 and in 6 trials on day 3 (p = 0.001). In 5 trials (n = 1004), prone positioning was associated with a reduced risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99; p = 0.04) but not with a reduced duration of ventilation. In 6 trials (n = 504), prone positioning was associated with an increased risk of pressure ulcers (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.71; p = 0.01). Most analyses found no to moderate between-trial heterogeneity.

INTERPRETATION

Mechanical ventilation in the prone position does not reduce mortality or duration of ventilation despite improved oxygenation and a decreased risk of pneumonia. Therefore, it should not be used routinely for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, a sustained improvement in oxygenation may support the use of prone positioning in patients with very severe hypoxemia, who have not been well-studied to date.

[The prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a critical systematic review]

OBJECTIVE

To do a critical systematic review regarding effects of prone positioning (PP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

A systematic review (Highwire, Medline, Cochrane Library from 1976 to 2004), using the keywords: prone position, acute respiratory distress syndrome, allowed us to include the human studies on PP in ARDS patients, independantly of their objectives or their type of protocol. To appreciate the studies validity, we scored the quality evidence of the studies in order to grade our conclusions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The qualitative analysis of the 58 included studies (1,500 patients returned prone, 4,000 episodes of PP) led to the following main conclusions: 1) the PP improves oxygenation in the majority of ARDS patients (level of evidence I); 2) the PP improves the pulmonary haemodynamics without altering the systemic haemodynamics (level of evidence III); 3) the PP enhances the recruitment maneuvers (level of evidence III); 4) because there are no formal predictive criteria for response to the PP, a "trial of PP" or better two PP trials are necessary to look for the responders; 5) the PP should be performed as early as possible in the course of severe ARDS; 6) the optimal duration of PP is 18 to 23 hours daily, and it should be continued until improvement of arterial oxygenation, or loss of the positive effect of PP on arterial oxygenation or evidently patient's death.