Clinical practice guidelines: the need for improved implementation strategies

Development of a computerized assessment of clinician adherence to a treatment guideline for patients with bipolar disorder

The adoption of treatment guidelines for complex psychiatric illness is increasing. Treatment decisions in psychiatry depend on a number of variables, including severity of symptoms, past treatment history, patient preferences, medication tolerability, and clinical response. While patient outcomes may be improved by the use of treatment guidelines, there is no agreed upon standard by which to assess the degree to which clinician behavior corresponds to those recommendations. This report presents a method to assess clinician adherence to the complex multidimensional treatment guideline for bipolar disorder utilized in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project. The steps involved in the development of this system are presented, including the reliance on standardized documentation, defining core variables of interest, selecting criteria for operationalization of those variables, and computerization of the assessment of adherence. The computerized assessment represents an improvement over other assessment methods, which have relied on laborious and costly chart reviews to extract clinical information and to analyze provider behavior. However, it is limited by the specificity of decisions that guided the adherence scoring process. Preliminary findings using this system with 2035 clinical visits conducted for the bipolar disorder module of TMAP Phase 3 are presented. These data indicate that this system of guideline adherence monitoring is feasible.

Guidelines for guidelines

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are suited tools for controlling and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of medical care. With the upcoming internet, the numbers of CPGs have increased rapidly, however, only few offer the attributes of good guidelines such as reliability/reproducibility, applicability, flexibility, clarity, multidisciplinary process, scheduled review and documentation of clinical and scientific evidence. Nearly identical criteria for appraisal of CPGs have been developed in many countries consisting of a checklist with questions concerning the quality of development, the content and format, and the applicability of the guideline. In the United States, guidelines which successfully passed the appraisal (or clearing) process, were stored in the National Guideline Clearinghouse, an internet-based database. A German counterpart is under construction, which will comprise clearing reports reviewing and appraising all existent guidelines covering a medical topic. Developing high-quality CPGs is a time consuming and expensive process. A widely accepted guideline for guideline development was published by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. CPGs touching neurosurgical topics are rare and often developed without neurosurgical participation. Due to the potential medico-economic impact of CPGs in the future, national neurosurgical societies and their international associations should play a more active role in the development and implementation of CPGs.

Program management of telemental health care services

Telemedicine is a new adjunct to the delivery of health care services that has been applied to a range of health care specialties, including mental health. When prospective telemedicine programs are planned, telemedicine is often envisaged as simply a question of introducing new technology. The development of a robust, sustainable telemental health program involves clinical, technical, and managerial considerations. The major barriers to making this happen are usually how practitioners and patients adapt successfully to the technology and not in the physical installation of telecommunications bandwidth and the associated hardware necessary for teleconsultation. This article outlines the requirements for establishing a viable telemental health service, one that is based on clinical need, practitioner acceptance, technical reliability, and revenue generation. It concludes that the major challenge associated with the implementation of telemental health does not lie in having the idea or in taking the idea to the project stage needed for proof of concept. The major challenge to the widespread adoption of telemental health is paying sufficient attention to the myriad of details needed to integrate models of remote health care delivery into the wider health care system.