Duplex scanning in the postoperative surveillance of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

The rate of missed diagnosis of lower-limb DVT by ultrasound amounts to 50% or so in patients without symptoms of DVT: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To assess whether the ultrasound (US) is a reliable approach in detecting lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients without symptoms of DVT.

METHODS

The research team performed a systematic search in PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, and Web of Science without language or date restrictions. Full-text reports on prospective diagnostic studies involve the detection of lower-limb proximal and distal DVT in patients without symptoms of DVT using US and venography. A meta-analysis was performed using Meta-DiSc (version 1.4), providing the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios of the detection accuracy of US. There were 4 different classes of subgroup analysis-the class of patients stratified by location of US exam (proximal, distal, whole leg), the class stratified by technique (color/doppler, compression, both modalities), the class stratified by kind of surgery (orthopedic, otherwise hospitalized) and the class stratified by era of publishing (1980s, 1990s, 2000s). The study quality and the risk of bias were evaluated using QUADAS-2, with heterogeneity was assessed and quantified by the Q score and I statistics, respectively.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 26 articles containing 41 individual studies with a total of 3951 patients without symptoms of DVT. Using venography as the gold standard, US for proximal DVT had a pooled sensitivity of 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 51%-66%) and a pooled specificity of 98% (95% CI = 97%-98%), US for distal DVT had a poor sensitivity of 43% (95% CI = 38%-48%) and a pooled specificity of 95% (95% CI = 94%-96%), US for whole-leg DVT had a pooled sensitivity of 59% (95% CI = 54%-64%) and a pooled specificity of 95% (95% CI = 94%-96%), US for post-major orthopedic surgery patients had a pooled sensitivity of 52% (95% CI = 49%-55%), and US for other types of patients had a pooled sensitivity of 58% (95% CI = 43%-72%). Pure compression technique for DVT had a poor sensitivity of 43% (95% CI = 39%-48%), pure color/doppler technique for DVT had a pooled sensitivity of 58% (95% CI = 53%-63%), compression and color/doppler technique for DVT had a pooled sensitivity of 61% (95% CI = 48%-74%).

CONCLUSION

US could be a useful tool for diagnosing DVT, but it has a lower positive rate and a higher false negative rate. The rate of missed diagnosis of lower-limb DVT by US amounts to 50% or so in the patients without symptoms of DVT. The negative results do not preclude the possibility of DVT and if appropriate heightened surveillance and continued monitoring or try a more accurate inspection method is warranted. The whole leg evaluation and color/doppler technique should be the preferred approach.

Evaluation of deep vein thrombosis with multidetector row CT after orthopedic arthroplasty: a prospective study for comparison with Doppler sonography

Objective

This prospective study evaluated the ability of indirect 16-row multidetector CT venography, in comparison with Doppler sonography, to detect deep vein thrombosis after total hip or knee replacement.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-two patients had undergone orthopedic replacement surgery on a total of 30 hip joints and 54 knee joints. The CT venography (scan delay time: 180 seconds; slice thickness/increment: 2/1.5 mm) and Doppler sonography were performed 8 to 40 days after surgery. We measured the z-axis length of the beam hardening artifact that degraded the image quality so that the presence of deep vein thrombosis couldn't be evaluated on the axial CT images. The incidence and location of deep vein thrombosis was analyzed. The diagnostic performance of the CT venograms was evaluated and compared with that of Doppler sonography as a standard of reference.

Results

The z-axis length (mean±standard deviation) of the beam hardening artifact was 4.5 ± 0.8 cm in the arthroplastic knees and 3.9 ± 2.9 cm in the arthroplastic hips. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was found in the popliteal or calf veins on Doppler sonography in 30 (48%) of the 62 patients. The CT venography has a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 90%, 97%, 96%, 91% and 94%, respectively.

Conclusion

The ability of CT venography to detect DVT was comparable to that of Doppler sonography despite of beam hardening artifact. Therefore, CT venography is feasible to use as an alternative modality for evaluating postarthroplasty patients.

O papel do mapeamento dúplex no diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda assintomática dos membros inferiores

O diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda sintomática está bem estabelecido com o uso do mapeamento dúplex, que apresenta sensibilidade de 100% e especificidade de 98%, para trombose venosa profunda proximal, e sensibilidade de 94% e especificidade de 75%, para distal. Na trombose venosa profunda recente e assintomática, o diagnóstico com o mapeamento dúplex ainda não está bem estabelecido, mostrando uma queda na acurácia desse método diagnóstico. Essa queda é devida ao fato de o trombo recente não ser oclusivo, apresentar a mesma ecogenicidade do sangue e uma consistência diminuída, prejudicando o teste da compressibilidade, que é o mais sensível para diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda. Nesta revisão, serão revistos artigos publicados que avaliaram a acurácia do mapeamento dúplex no diagnóstico da trombose venosa profunda assintomática.

A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients

Evaluation of the accuracy of ultrasound has yielded heterogeneous results. Our objective was to summarize the evidence on the accuracy of ultrasound compared to venography in asymptomatic patients, taking into account the variation due to threshold differences. Searches of journal table of contents, computer databases (Medline, Embase, Biomed, Cochrane) and conference proceedings were performed. A study was eligible if it prospectively compared ultrasound to venography for the diagnosis of DVT in asymptomatic patients. Data of studies selected for inclusion were extracted independently by two authors. High quality studies with consecutive patient enrollment, blind evaluation of the two techniques, and absence of verification bias are summarized as Level 1, while those not fulfilling one or more of these criteria are considered Level 2. Original study authors were contacted to confirm accuracy and to provide missing data. A pooled estimate of the accuracy of ultrasound was obtained according to the method of Moses and coworkers. This method gives a summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The DOR is a single indicator of test performance. It varies between 0 and infinity and exceeds 1, only when ultrasound is more often positive in patients with DVT relative to those without DVT. Higher DOR indicates better discriminatory test performance. Thirty one studies were rated as potentially unbiased and graded as Level 1. The mean prevalence of DVT as determined by venography was 22%. In Level 1 studies, the odds of positive ultrasound in proximal veins was 379 times higher (95% confidence limits 65, 2,200) and in distal veins 32 times higher (7.5, 135) among patients with DVT than those without. Our results suggest that, particularly for proximal veins, ultrasound is accurate for the diagnosis of DVT in asymptomatic postoperative orthopedic patients. More research is needed in other clinical settings.

The assessment of deep vein thromboses for therapeutic trials

In the current paper, we provide recommendations for the assessment of deep vein thromboses for the purpose of therapeutic trials evaluating antithrombotic drugs in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis. We have reviewed recently published articles on diagnostic and therapeutic studies, and we have evaluated methods of assessments. Ascending venography has been considered as the reference test for the confirmation of DVT. A roentgenographic image is subsequently available for review and allows classification by blinded, objective observers. However, venography poses substantial clinical and methodological limitations, particularly in the setting of systematic screening for all patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Compression ultrasonography may replace venography for systematic screening of DVT in clinical trials, provided that specific methodological details are specified in the protocol and are fulfilled to ensure high and comparable sensitivity and specificity from all participating centers. This non-invasive technique has virtually no contraindications, and therefore more patients can be enrolled and evaluated. Furthermore, the compression ultrasonograph can be videotaped for central reading. Compression ultrasonography has already been adopted as the principal method for evaluating DVT in several ongoing large scale prevention trials with the approval of major drug agencies.

Perioperative deep vein thrombosis in Chinese patients undergoing craniotomy

BACKGROUND

We attempted to determine the incidence of perioperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in Chinese patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors and to assess the efficacy of clinical and serial calf circumference assessment in detecting DVT.

METHODS

Between June 1999 and February 2001, 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective craniotomy for brain tumors at the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre were examined for perioperative DVT. The demographic data, Glasgow coma score (GCS), mobility status, and the operative details were recorded. Graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression were applied perioperatively as prophylaxis against DVT. Serial duplex scans were performed before and after operation. Clinical examination was also performed daily to look for signs of DVT. The calf circumference was measured at fixed levels for both limbs before each duplex scan surveillance.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 44 males and 56 females, with a mean age of 54 +/- 15 years (range, 20-81 years). There was no preoperative DVT. Postoperative DVT was detected on duplex scan in four patients (4%), two of whom had bilateral involvement. The thrombosis was confined to the calf veins in two limbs. The demographic data, neurologic status and operative details of patients with and without DVT were similar. Patients with DVT had no clinically recognizable signs. The change in calf circumference measurement was also not predictive of DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of perioperative DVT in Chinese patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors appears to be low with the present mechanical prophylactic measures. Given the low incidence of proximal DVT as detected by duplex scan, the use of heparin prophylaxis may not be justified because of the increased risk of intracranial bleeding. Clinical assessment with calf circumference measurement is unreliable in the diagnosis of DVT.