Stability and compatibility of morphine-clonidine admixtures in an implantable infusion system

Physicochemical Stability Study of the Morphine-Bupivacaine-Ziconotide Association

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the physicochemical stability of morphine-bupivacaine-ziconotide mixtures used in intrathecal analgesia in polypropylene syringes and intrathecal pumps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stability study method was conceived according to International Council for Harmonisation guidelines. For propylene syringes, six different mixtures of morphine-bupivacaine and ziconotide were assessed over seven days. Two storage temperatures were tested (5 °C ± 3 °C and 25 °C ± 2 °C). For implantable pumps, nine different mixtures were assessed over 60 days and stored at 37 °C. Assays were performed using ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography. Turbidity and pH also were measured throughout the study.

RESULTS

Results confirmed excellent physicochemical stability for morphine and bupivacaine in the study for all conditions investigated (pumps at 37 °C, polypropylene syringes at 5 °C ± 3 °C and 25 °C ± 2 °C). Concerning ziconotide, after seven days, our study showed that every 95% confidence interval calculated had lower bounds >90% for all mixtures stored in polypropylene syringes. In implantable pumps, a decrease of the concentration was observed in all the mixtures studied. Moreover, the appearance of a degradation product confirmed the ziconotide degradation.

CONCLUSION

All results are in favor with a physicochemical stable preparation for six mixture profiles when stored in polypropylene syringes at 5 °C ± 3 °C and 25 °C ± 2 °C. For mixtures stored in implantable pumps, the efficacy should decrease over time owing to the degradation of ziconotide. A trade-off between high morphine concentration and increased refill interval will need to be found by clinicians.

Evaluation of 30-days stability of morphine hydrochloride and clonidine at high and low concentrations in polypropylene syringes

OBJECTIVES

Clonidine is an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and is frequently combined with opioids (ie, morphine hydrochloride (HCl)) for the management of chronic pain. In palliative care, the administration of clonidine and morphine HCl is recommended in case of tolerance effect. This study aimed to evaluate the physical and chemical stability of this admixture at high and low concentrations in 14 and 48 mL polypropylene syringes.

METHODS

The stability of a low concentration admixture of clonidine (Catapressan 0.15 mg/mL, Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany) and morphine (morphine HCl 40 mg/mL, Sterop, Belgium) at 0.003 and 0.417 mg/mL, respectively, was evaluated by using five polypropylene syringes of 48 mL. The high concentration admixture consisted of 0.032 mg/mL clonidine and 4.286 mg/mL morphine HCl and was evaluated by using five polypropylene syringes of 14 mL. All syringes were stored for 30 days at 5°C±3°C. Periodic samples were visually and microscopically examined to observe any particle appearance or colour change. pH and absorbance at three wavelengths (350, 410 and 550 nm) were monitored. The concentrations were measured by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detection.

RESULTS

During the 30 days, there was no change in colour or appearance of opacity, turbidity or precipitation, and pH remained stable. The low and high concentration admixtures were considered chemically stable since the lower limit of the 90% CI remained superior to 90% of the initial concentration. Concentration measurements showed that the degradation rate was less than 1% over 10 days for each component in both admixtures.

CONCLUSIONS

The admixture of clonidine and morphine HCl at low and high concentrations in polypropylene syringes appeared to be physically and chemically stable throughout the study period of 30 days at 5°C±3°C. In conclusion, the admixture can be prepared in advance under aseptic conditions by a centralised intravenous additive service in the pharmacy department.

Stability of Morphine Sulfate-Clonidine and Sufentanil-Clonidine Mixtures

BACKGROUND

Spinal analgesia is recommended for intractable cancer pain. Morphine-clonidine and sufentanil-clonidine are often used in association in intrathecal drug delivery systems, injected by intraabdominal pumps. To refill these pumps and to limit patient transport, it may be necessary to ship the mixtures in polypropylene syringes to peripheral establishments located near patient homes. The purpose of this study is to determine the stability of morphine-clonidine and sufentanil-clonidine mixtures in polypropylene syringes to ensure the best and safest transport conditions and in implantable pumps for intrathecal use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The stability study method was conceived according to the International Council for Harmonization guidelines. For polypropylene syringes, four different mixtures of morphine-clonidine and sufentanil-clonidine were assessed over seven days. Two storage temperatures were tested (5 ± 3 °C and 25 ± 2 °C). For implantable pumps, two different mixtures of morphine-clonidine and sufentanil-clonidine were assessed over 28 days and stored at 37 °C.

RESULTS

For the morphine-clonidine mixtures in polypropylene syringes, all mixtures remained stable for five days in both storage conditions (5 ± 3 °C and 25 ± 2 °C) because of relative concentrations systematically positioned between 90% and 110% (95% CIs of the mean of three samples). The two mixtures in implantable pumps remained stable for 28 days. For the sufentanil-clonidine mixtures in polypropylene syringes, cold conservation kept all the preparations stable for seven days, whereas a quick degradation was observed after only two days for ambient storage conditions. This result is similar to that with an implantable pump, in which the concentration is <90% on day 7 for low concentration mixtures. No visual modification, no significant pH modification, and no changes in turbidity assays were observed in either study.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the stability of the morphine-clonidine mixtures in syringes stored at 5 °C for five days and in implantable pumps stored at 37 °C for 28 days. For the sufentanil-clonidine mixtures, the results show stability in syringes for seven days at 5 °C. Pump results show stability of seven days for low concentrations and 28 days for high concentrations.

Physicochemical Stability Study of the Morphine-Ropivacaine-Ziconotide Association in Implantable Pumps for Intrathecal Administration

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the physicochemical stability of morphine-ropivacaine-ziconotide mixtures used in intrathecal analgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight mixtures were studied to assess their stability profiles according to the initial drug concentrations used. The solutions obtained were put in implantable pumps and stored at 37 °C over a period of 60 days. Assays were performed using ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography. Turbidity and pH were also measured throughout the study.

RESULTS

Results confirmed excellent physicochemical stability for morphine and ropivacaine. Concerning ziconotide, three of the eight mixtures did not show any sign of chemical instability: average concentrations remained constant throughout the 60 days. A decrease of the concentration was observed for the five other mixtures. Moreover, the appearance of a degradation product linked to oxidation confirmed the ziconotide degradation.

CONCLUSIONS

All these results are in favor of a physicochemical stable preparation for three of the mixture profiles when stored in implantable pumps at 37 °C up to 60 days. For the five others, the efficacy should decrease over time owing to the degradation of ziconotide. The decrease in kinetics of the ziconotide concentration depends on the mixing profile. One possibility is to adapt the filling intervals according to the profile of the mixture. Finally, the results show the period of stability ensuring maximum analgesic efficacy for the eight mixture profiles studied.

Physicochemical and Microbiological Stability of a New Oral Clonidine Solution for Paediatric Use

Background

As many drugs are unavailable for paediatric use, hospital pharmacies are often required to develop suitable formulations themselves. Clonidine is commonly used in paediatrics (in severe hypertension, in opiate withdrawal syndrome, in tics and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome or in anaesthetic premedication) but no appropriate formulation has been drawn up. The aims of this work were to develop an oral solution of clonidine dedicated to children and to assess its physicochemical and microbiological stability.

Methods

Formulation of an oral solution of clonidine hydrochloride suitable for neonates and paediatrics was developed using the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), with as few excipients as possible and without any complex excipient vehicle. A stability study was made according to GERPAC-SFPC guidelines. At each point in time (D0, D1, D7, D15, D29, D60 and D90), visual aspect (limpidity), pH and osmolality were established. Clonidine concentration was quantified using a stability-indicating HPLC-UV-DAD method previously developed from a forced degradation study and validated according to SFSTP Pharma. Microbiological stability was also tested according to the European Pharmacopeia monograph with the best adapted method (by comparing membrane filtration and inclusion). Solutions were stored in amber glass bottles with an oral adapter for up to 3 months in two different conditions: 5 °C +/– 3 °C and at 25 °C +/– 2 °C with 60 % residual humidity (climatic chamber).

Results

The formulated oral solution is composed of API at a concentration of 10 µg/mL and of potassium sorbate (0.3 %), citric acid, potassium citrate (pH 5 buffer) and sodium saccharine (0.025 %). Forced degradation highlighted six degradation products and the method was validated in the acceptance limits of ± 5 %. On D29, the mean percentages of the initial clonidine concentrations (+/–standard deviation) were 92.95+/–1.28 % in the solution stored at 25 °C +/– 2 °C and 97.44+/–1.21 % when stored at 5 °C +/– 3 °C. On D90, means were respectively 81.82+/–0.41 % and 93.66+/–0.71 %. The visual aspect did not change. Physical parameters remained stable during the study: pH varied from 4.94 to 5.09 and osmolality from 82 to 92 mOsm/kg in the two conditions tested here. Membrane filtration appeared to be the more sensitive method. Whatever the storage conditions,<1 micro-organism/mL was identified (only environmental) with no detected E.coli.

Conclusions

This formulation is stable for at least 3 months at 5 °C +/– 3 °C in amber glass bottles and for one month when stored at room temperature. Microbiological stability was proven in accordance with the European Pharmacopeia.

Current and Future Issues in the Development of Spinal Agents for the Management of Pain

Targeting analgesic drugs for spinal delivery reflects the fact that while the conscious experience of pain is mediated supraspinally, input initiated by high intensity stimuli, tissue injury and/or nerve injury is encoded at the level of the spinal dorsal horn and this output informs the brain as to the peripheral environment. This encoding process is subject to strong upregulation resulting in hyperesthetic states and downregulation reducing the ongoing processing of nociceptive stimuli reversing the hyperesthesia and pain processing. The present review addresses the biology of spinal nociceptive processing as relevant to the effects of intrathecally-delivered drugs in altering pain processing following acute stimulation, tissue inflammation/injury and nerve injury. The review covers i) the major classes of spinal agents currently employed as intrathecal analgesics (opioid agonists, alpha 2 agonists; sodium channel blockers; calcium channel blockers; NMDA blockers; GABA A/B agonists; COX inhibitors; ii) ongoing developments in the pharmacology of spinal therapeutics focusing on less studied agents/targets (cholinesterase inhibition; Adenosine agonists; iii) novel intrathecal targeting methodologies including gene-based approaches (viral vectors, plasmids, interfering RNAs); antisense, and toxins (botulinum toxins; resniferatoxin, substance P Saporin); and iv) issues relevant to intrathecal drug delivery (neuraxial drug distribution), infusate delivery profile, drug dosing, formulation and principals involved in the preclinical evaluation of intrathecal drug safety.

The Application of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Methodology to Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Pain Management

Objective

This study aimed to utilize failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to transform clinical insights into a risk mitigation plan for intrathecal (IT) drug delivery in pain management.

Methods

The FMEA methodology, which has been used for quality improvement, was adapted to assess risks (i.e., failure modes) associated with IT therapy. Ten experienced pain physicians scored 37 failure modes in the following categories: patient selection for therapy initiation (efficacy and safety concerns), patient safety during IT therapy, and product selection for IT therapy. Participants assigned severity, probability, and detection scores for each failure mode, from which a risk priority number (RPN) was calculated. Failure modes with the highest RPNs (i.e., most problematic) were discussed, and strategies were proposed to mitigate risks.

Results

Strategic discussions focused on 17 failure modes with the most severe outcomes, the highest probabilities of occurrence, and the most challenging detection. The topic of the highest‐ranked failure mode (RPN = 144) was manufactured monotherapy versus compounded combination products. Addressing failure modes associated with appropriate patient and product selection was predicted to be clinically important for the success of IT therapy.

Conclusions

The methodology of FMEA offers a systematic approach to prioritizing risks in a complex environment such as IT therapy. Unmet needs and information gaps are highlighted through the process. Risk mitigation and strategic planning to prevent and manage critical failure modes can contribute to therapeutic success.

Intrathecal Clonidine via Lumbar Puncture Decreases Blood Pressure in Patients With Poorly Controlled Hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Oral clonidine is used to treat hypertension but often produces sedation and severe dry mouth; intrathecal clonidine is used to treat chronic pain but may produce hypotension. This clinical feasibility study was conducted to determine if intrathecal clonidine decreases blood pressure in patients with poorly controlled hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-arm, open-label study was conducted in ten subjects who were taking at least three antihypertensive medications including a diuretic and had an in-office systolic blood pressure between 140 and 190 mm Hg. On the day of treatment, blood pressure was measured before and after a single lumbar intrathecal dose (150 mcg) of clonidine using an automatic oscillometric device every 10-15 min for four hours. Student's paired t-test was used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

Maximal reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures averaging 63 ± 20/29 ± 13 mm Hg were observed approximately two hours after clonidine administration. Decreases in systolic pressure were strongly correlated with baseline systolic pressure. Clonidine produced a significant decrease in heart rate of 11 ± 7 beats/min. No subject required intravenous fluids or vasopressor rescue therapy, or reported spinal headache.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first clinical study in subjects with hypertension that demonstrates significant and profound acute reductions in blood pressure after a single dose of intrathecal clonidine. Future placebo-controlled, dose-escalating studies are warranted to assess the long-term effects of intrathecal clonidine infusion via an implantable drug pump in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension at risk of stroke or myocardial infarction.

Intrathecal drug therapy for long-term pain management

PURPOSE

The use, safety, and efficacy of intrathecal medication administration with implantable pumps for cancer and chronic pain management are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Implanted intrathecal drug-delivery systems (IDDSs) are used for long-term management of persistent, severe pain despite a multimodal approach with conventional pain treatment options. Currently, consensus papers published in the literature are used as guidelines for determining patient selection and medication administration, because there is a lack of supporting evidence from randomized, controlled, clinical trials. Pharmacists have a critical role in the safe use of intrathecal medication. Most of the medication concentrations and combinations administered through IDDSs are not commercially available and therefore must be compounded in a pharmacy. Medications commonly administered through IDDSs include opioids, local anesthetics, clonidine, baclofen, and ziconotide. It is important for pharmacists who prepare products for IDDSs to understand the pharmacology, adverse effects, and concentration limitations of each medication in order to prevent adverse events related to postoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage, infection, catheter-tip inflammatory masses, withdrawal, and overdose. Pharmacists play an important role in maintaining quality assurance of intrathecal drug use, including the use of standard procedures for ordering and compounding medications, documentation of patient education, and monitoring of patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The use of long-term intrathecal drug delivery for the treatment of intractable pain or intolerable medication adverse effects has expanded to include the treatment of patients with chronic or cancer-related pain. Important considerations for the use of intrathecal drug therapy include the appropriate selection of patients, delivery systems, and medications, as well as potential complications of therapy and quality-assurance measures necessary to ensure patient safety.

Morphine, haloperidol and hyoscine N-butyl bromide combined in s.c. infusion solutions: Compatibility and stability

The administration of drugs by subcutaneous infusion is routinely practiced in palliative medicine for the management of patients who are no longer able to take oral medication. It is common for two or more drugs to be combined in subcutaneous solutions. The combination of an opioid with other drugs (haloperiol lactate and hyoscine N-butyl bromide) can be very valuable. Unfortunately, the compatibility and stability of morphine hydrochloride, haloperidol lactate and hyoscine N-butyl bromide combined in the same solution has not yet been determined. Therefore, this study examined the stability of ternary solutions containing morphine HCl, haloperidol lactate and hyoscine N-butyl bromide at different dose ranges. Twelve different solutions were assessed for 15 days after preparation in polypropylene syringes using 0.9% saline as diluent. Triplicate syringes were stored at 25 degrees C. HPLC was the analytical technique used to measure morphine HCl, haloperidol lactate and hyoscine N-butyl bromide. Initial concentration ranges were 1.67-10.0 mg/ml for morphine HCl, 0.417-0.625 mg/ml for haloperidol lactate and, 5.0-6.67 mg/ml for hyoscine N-butyl bromide. All three drugs were very stable (>92.5%) when stored at 25 degrees C. The clinical performance of the admixture was retrospectively assessed in 21 terminal oncology patients. Total symptom control was achieved in 17 out of 21 patients with very good local tolerance.

Compatibility and stability of dexamethasone sodium phosphate and ketamine hydrochloride subcutaneous infusions in polypropylene syringes

The stability of ketamine hydrochloride injection and dexamethasone sodium phosphate injection, when mixed and stored in polypropylene syringes, was studied. Formulations containing ketamine hydrochloride (50 mg or 600 mg) and dexamethasone sodium phosphate (1 mg) in 0.9% sodium chloride injection (to 14 ml) were prepared and stored at 4 degrees C, 23 degrees C, and 37 degrees C, under normal fluorescent light conditions, for 192 hours. The concentrations of the drugs were determined at 0, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 96, and 192 hours using a validated high-pressure liquid chromatography method. The pH, color, and visible particles of each solution were also assessed at each time point. All formulations tested maintained more than 98% of the initial concentrations of both drugs, and no degradation products were detected. The solutions remained clear and colorless and the pH varied within 0.05 units throughout 192 hours. The results indicate that, at the concentrations studied, combinations of ketamine hydrochloride and dexamethasone sodium phosphate in 0.9% sodium chloride injection were physically and chemically stable for at least 192 hours (8 days) when stored in polypropylene syringes.

Stability of admixture containing morphine sulfate, bupivacaine hydrochloride, and clonidine hydrochloride in an implantable infusion system

Intrathecal infusion is often performed using drug combinations. This study was conducted to evaluate the stability of the admixture of morphine sulfate, bupivacaine hydrochloride, and clonidine hydrochloride when used in an implantable pump under simulated clinical use conditions. SynchroMed implantable pumps were filled with an admixture and incubated at 37 degrees C for a period of 90 days. Drug admixture stored in glass vials at 4 degrees C and at 37 degrees C served as controls. Samples which included pump reservoir and catheter delivered aliquots were collected every 30 days and analyzed for drug concentrations using a stability-indicating HPLC method. All drugs contained in the admixture were stable and the original concentrations remained greater than 96%. Over 90 days, and with the pump at the simulated body temperature of 37 degrees C, there were no evident heat catalyzed or device catalyzed reactions.

Stability of clonidine in clonidine-hydromorphone mixture from implanted intrathecal infusion pumps in chronic pain patients

Clonidine is frequently added to opioids in implantable intrathecal pumps for the management of chronic pain. In such devices, a small non-retrievable volume is always present in the reservoir, and its effect on drug stability is unknown. Furthermore, stability of clonidine, when mixed with hydromorphone, has not been previously determined. This study examined the stability of clonidine when co-administered with hydromorphone in implanted intrathecal pumps. Samples of hydromorphone-clonidine before pump refill and from residual solution at subsequent refill were obtained from chronic pain patients. Clonidine concentration was measured using HPLC. Twenty paired samples from 3 patients were analyzed. All 3 patients had a SynchroMed pump implanted for 3-5 years. We found no loss in clonidine concentration during the time between refills (35 +/- 13 days), and no correlation between clonidine concentration and time interval between refills. In conclusion, clonidine, mixed with hydromorphone, is stable when delivered by implantable intrathecal pump for long-term use.

The effect of epidural clonidine on perioperative cytokine response, postoperative pain, and bowel function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery

The postoperative period is associated with an increased production of cytokines, which augment pain sensitivity. We investigated the hypothesis that epidural clonidine premedication and postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) including clonidine would decrease the release of proinflammatory (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1beta, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha) and antiinflammatory (IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA)) cytokines in patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery and that they would provide better postoperative analgesia. Forty patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups of 20 each: the control group received normal saline 10 mL, whereas the clonidine group received epidural clonidine 150 microg diluted with 9 mL of normal saline 30 min before surgery. Venous blood samples for cytokine levels were obtained before induction, at the end of surgery, and after surgery at 12 and 24 h. After surgery, the clonidine group patients received PCEA with morphine (0.1 mg/mL) and clonidine (1.5 microg/mL) in 0.2% ropivacaine 100 mL, whereas control group patients received only PCEA morphine and ropivacaine. Patients in the clonidine group exhibited longer PCEA trigger times, lower pain scores at rest and while coughing, less morphine consumption, and a faster return of bowel function throughout the 72-h postoperative observation period, compared with patients in the control group. For patients in the clonidine group, production of IL-1RA, IL-6, and IL-8 was significantly less increased at the end of the surgical procedure and at 12 and 24 h after surgery. However, the concentrations of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha were not significantly increased.

Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003: an update on the management of pain by intraspinal drug delivery-- report of an expert panel

Intraspinal drug infusion using fully implantable pump and catheter systems is a safe and effective therapy for selected patients with chronic pain. The options for this approach are increasing, as drugs that are commercially available for systemic administration are adapted to this use and other drugs that are in development specifically for intraspinal administration become available. In 2000 a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference was organized to evaluate the existing literature and develop guidelines for drug selection. The major outcome of this effort, an algorithm for drug selection, was based on the best available evidence at the time. Rapid changes have occurred in the science and practice of intraspinal infusion and a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003 was organized to pursue the following goals: 1) to review the literature on intraspinal drug infusion since 1999, 2) to revise the 2000 drug-selection algorithm, 3) to develop guidelines for optimizing drug dosage and concentration, 4) to create a process for documenting minimum evidence supporting the use of a drug for intraspinal infusion, and 5) to clarify issues pertaining to compounding of drugs. Based on the best available evidence and expert opinion, consensus recommendations were developed in all these areas. The panel's conclusions may provide a foundation for clinical practice and a rational basis for new research.