Actual and theoretical risks for visual loss following use of the implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia

Treatment of high myopia/myopic astigmatism with a combination of WaveLight Contoura with LYRA protocol and wavefront-optimized treatment

Purpose

The aim of this article was to demonstrate how WaveLight Contoura and wavefront optimization (WFO) can be used together to treat high myopia/myopic astigmatism corrections.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 consecutive myopic/myopic astigmatism eyes that exceeded the Contoura labeling of -8.00 with -3.00 D of astigmatism. Residual correction after Contoura with Layer Yolked Reduction of Astigmatism protocol was treated with WFO Contoura LASIK correction. All patients had 3 months of follow-up. Accuracy to the desired refractive goal was assessed by postoperative refraction, regression, postoperative vision, and anecdotal subjective night vision quality.

Results

No eyes lost best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and 54% of eyes gained BCVA. Out of 22 distance eyes, five achieved 20/15 or better, 18 achieved 20/20 vision, two achieved 20/25, and three achieved 20/30 vision. Preoperatively, only 14 eyes could achieve 20/20 vision. No night vision issues were observed in anecdotal reporting by patients except for those who needed enhancements that had not yet been performed.

Conclusion

Treatment of high myopia/astigmatism with this combination of Contoura with LYRA protocol and WFO results in excellent visual outcomes, large ablation zones on topography, and few subjective reported night vision issues.

Modern Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation (Refractive Lens Exchange) Is Safe and Effective in Treating High Myopia

Improved efficacy, predictability, and safety of modern phacoemulsification have resulted in cataract surgery being considered as a refractive procedure. Refractive lens exchange by definition is a surgery aimed at replacing the cataractous or clear crystalline lens with an intraocular lens (IOL) in cases of high ametropia. The excellent intraocular optics of this procedure provide a better visual outcome as compared with laser refractive surgery in high myopia. With advances in technology and IOL formulas, the predictability of refractive outcome after cataract surgery in high myopes has improved. The option of addressing presbyopia using multifocal/accommodating IOLs or monovision results in patients achieving reasonable spectacle independence. The most important concern with respect to phacoemulsification in high myopia is the risk of pseudophakic retinal detachment. High myopia is an independent risk factor for retinal detachment, and recent publications have reported a much lesser risk of retinal detachment specifically attributable to phacoemulsification in high myopes, especially if a thorough posterior segment evaluation is done and patients are followed up until development of complete posterior vitreous detachment. Refractive lens exchange is an effective and safe option to correct high myopia and can significantly improve quality of life in select patients.

DSAEK for implantable collamer lens dislocation and corneal decompensation 6 years after implantation

A 39-year-old woman with a history of high myopia underwent uneventful implantation of phakic posterior chamber implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) 6 years earlier in both eyes with a visual acuity of 20/20 bilaterally. The patient presented as an emergency with sudden decreased vision in her right eye after blunt trauma. Slit-lamp examination showed a partially dislocated ICL in the anterior chamber, associated with ocular hypertension. It was decided to treat her with topical ocular hypotensive agents and surgical repositioning of the ICL. There was a progressive loss of endothelial cells and decreased visual acuity. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was needed to correct the endothelial failure. This case presents a potential complication of the ICL several years after implantation, and should be considered in these types of procedures.

Visian Collamer Phakic Intraocular Lens in High Myopic Asian Eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Implantable Collamer Lens (Visian), a phakic intraocular lens (PIOL), in the correction of high myopia in Asian eyes.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 61 eyes in 40 Chinese patients with mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -14.54 +/- 3.61 diopters (D) (range: -7.00 to -24.75 D) who underwent Visian PIOL implantation from May 2002 to December 2004. The anatomical differences between Asian and Caucasian eyes were compared.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 13.67 +/- 8.51 months (range: 1 to 32 months). Predictability of the manifest spherical equivalent refraction to within +/- 1.00 D was achieved in 88% of eyes and +/- 0.50 D in 72.5% of eyes. The mean postoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction was -0.10 +/- 0.74 D, with 97% of eyes maintaining or gaining > or = 1 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). Two eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA. Retinal detachment developed in 1 eye 15 months after initial surgery. Because of the statistical differences in anterior chamber depth and white-to-white distance between Caucasian and Chinese eyes, the Visian PIOL size was more accurate if the calculation was modified so that 0.5 mm was added to the white-to-white measurement if the anterior chamber depth was < or = 3.0 mm and 1.0 mm to the white-to-white measurement if the anterior chamber depth was >3.0 mm. Initial incorrect sizing using the original nomogram led to the only cataract in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of the Visian PIOL for correcting moderate to high myopia in Asian eyes shows similar safety and efficacy to the FDA clinical trial of Caucasian eyes. Proper sizing of the Visian PIOL is important and differs slightly in Asian eyes.

Correction of high myopia with the PRL phakic intraocular lens

PURPOSE

To assess the predictability, efficacy, safety, and complications of the PRL (CIBA Vision) phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) in the correction of high myopia.

SETTING

Clínica Oftalmológica Pasteur, Santiago, Chile.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 53 eyes of 39 patients who received a PRL pIOL. The spherical equivalent (SE), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), efficacy index (postoperative UCVA/preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA]), safety index (BSCVA/preoperative BSCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), iridocorneal angle, and distance between the crystalline lens and PRL were prospectively assessed during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 39 years. The mean power of the implanted pIOL was -12.73 diopters (D) +/- 2.87 (SD) (range -20.00 to -7.00 D), for a preoperative SE of -17.27 +/- 4.58 D (range -31.50 to -8.75 D). The mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.50 +/- 0.70 (logMAR equivalent), and the mean follow-up was 8 +/- 9.4 months. The mean postoperative SE was -0.23 +/- 1.05 D; 71.2% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D. Sixty percent of patients had UCVA of 20/40 or better, and 88.2% of patients had BSCVA of 20/40 or better. Ninety-two percent maintained or gained 1 or more lines of BSCVA; 5.7% lost more than 1 line. There was no significant change in IOP (P = .40), and the mean distance between the crystalline lens and pIOL was 370 microm (ultrasound) and 604 microm (optical coherence tomography). Late complications included 1 case each of retinal detachment and lens subluxation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PRL implantation in high myopia was predictable and effective, retinal detachment and IOL subluxations occurred. Other posterior chamber pIOLs should be used until the complications associated with the PRL pIOL are resolved.

Outcome of simultaneous phakic implantable contact lens removal with cataract extraction and pseudophakic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome of simultaneous implantable contact lens (ICL) removal and cataract extraction with pseudophakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

SETTING

CODET Aris Vision Institute, Tijuana, Mexico.

METHODS

This retrospective noncomparative interventional case series evaluated 14 eyes of 12 patients with ICL implantations who developed a cataract and simultaneously had ICL removal and cataract extraction with IOL implantation. The follow-up time was at least 6 months (range 6 to 24 months). Visual acuity (logMAR), manifest refraction, intraocular pressure, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients (14 eyes), 10 patients (12 eyes) had ICL surgery to correct high myopia and 2 patients (2 eyes), to correct hyperopia. The mean uncorrected visual acuity after ICL implantation (before cataract development), before cataract surgery, and after cataract surgery were 0.48 +/- 0.32, 0.83 +/- 0.34, and 0.40 +/- 0.27, respectively. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before ICL implantation, after ICL implantation, and after cataract surgery were 0.31 +/- 0.21, 0.28 +/- 0.19, and 0.27 +/- 0.21, respectively. The mean final manifest spherical equivalent was 0.30 diopters (D) +/- 1.07 (SD) (range +2.38 to 2.0 D). Ten eyes (71.4%) were within +/-1.0 D of the calculated target. One eye had a tear in the posterior capsule with vitreous loss during cataract surgery. No other intraoperative, perioperative, or postoperative complications were observed. No loss of BCVA was recorded at the last postoperative visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Lens opacities and cataract formation are a potential complication of ICL surgery. The removal of the ICL and the cataract with IOL implantation was found to be safe, with predictable refractive results.