Tactics for type I diabetes

Clinical review: Realistic expectations and practical use of continuous glucose monitoring for the endocrinologist

CONTEXT

Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been available for type 1 diabetes for several years. This paper is a status report on our early experiences with this next technology.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The two major sources of data acquisition included PubMed search strategies and personal experience of the author from clinical experience.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Data assessing CGM accuracy, short-term outcomes (12 wk), and longer term outcomes (6 months) are reported. Potential strategies for successful and efficient use in an office or clinic setting are also discussed. Practical aspects of CGM use (alarm settings, using glycemic trending information) are also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of this technology has improved in the short amount of time it has been available. Six-month data suggest that patient selection is a key for success. Patients who do not understand or practice the basics of intensive insulin therapy have the greatest challenges. Those who do best watch the receiver frequently, continue with frequent home blood glucose monitoring, use the trending information to make insulin adjustments, and understand the limitations of the technology. With insurance reimbursement improving, CGM is gaining acceptance as an important tool for the management of type 1 diabetes. Like home blood glucose monitoring and insulin pump therapy, this technology by itself is not a panacea for diabetes control. However, it further adds to our ability to improve the lives of people with diabetes. Long-term, the hope is that this technology will pave the way for a "closed-loop" device.

Update on diabetes diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

The American Diabetes Association has established recommendations for the testing of undiagnosed people. Once diagnosed, those with diabetes must strive to maintain a level of glucose control that results in a metabolism that approaches that of people without diabetes. The dentist also can provide risk-reduction strategies for people prone to develop diabetes, and refer patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of diabetes to physicians.

METHODS

The authors describe criteria for establishing a diagnosis of diabetes and for identifying people at high risk of developing the disease. A combination of approaches in the medical management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus is presented, along with target outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes maintain a glycosylated hemoglobin value of no higher than 7 percent. New therapeutic research includes early clinical trials of islet cell transplantation and therapeutic cloning from human stem cells, which may provide an alternate source of insulin-producing islet cells and, thus, may offer a potential cure for diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous metabolic control of diabetes can be achieved through a combination of therapeutic modalities and the establishment and maintenance of target outcomes. The dentist can implement preventive strategies and refer patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of diabetes to physicians.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The dentist and physician must work together as a team to achieve rigorous metabolic control of diabetes in their patients.

Properties of pramlintide and insulin upon mixing

PURPOSE

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of pramlintide and various insulin formulations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) when given as separate injections or mixed in the same syringe before injection were studied.

METHODS

In two randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled, five-period-crossover studies, patients with type 1 DM received preprandial injections of pramlintide, short-acting insulin, and long-acting insulin administered either by separate injections or after mixing in various combinations. Serum free insulin and plasma glucose concentrations were measured for 10 hours and plasma pramlintide concentrations for 5 hours after injection.

RESULTS

Blood samples were collected from a total of 51 patients. All treatments involving mixtures were comparable to separate injections with respect to the area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of serum free insulin. There were some minor differences in the AUC and Cmax of pramlintide. No injection-site reactions or other unexpected adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Mixing pramlintide with short- or long-acting insulin in the same syringe before subcutaneous injection did not affect the pharmacodynamics of glucose or the pharmacokinetics of insulin or pramlintide in a clinically significant manner.

Intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes

There have been amazing advances for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. As clinicians proceed into the twenty-first century, it is appropriate to reflect both about accomplishments and about the prospects of improved therapeutic options. Regarding the former, perhaps no advance can be compared to the discovery of insulin. Since then, the improvements in therapy have appeared to be too slow for physicians, patients, and their families. In actuality, over the past 20 years, the pace for the development of new tools for the treatment of this once fatal disease has been remarkable. The treatment of type 1 diabetes has evolved with advances in the treatment of microvascular, neuropathic, and macrovascular complications. The future is even more promising, with the possibility of even preventing the disease before the development of hyperglycemia. The challenge for the present is teaching all individuals involved with the management of patients with type 1 diabetes to manage the condition as effectively as possible.