Pre-eclampsia: fluids, drugs, and anesthetic management

Anesthetic Challenges Associated With Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Pregnant Woman Scheduled for a Caesarean Section

Recently, there has been a rise in reports of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), which is an uncommon neurologic illness. The precise cause of PRES syndrome is yet unknown, but there are certain illnesses that have been associated with it. Furthermore, because of advances in imaging methods and growing awareness, the connection between PRES and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia is becoming increasingly recognised. Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia by itself poses distinct perioperative difficulties; in addition, PRES makes anesthesia administration more difficult. Regretfully, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the anesthetic treatment provided to the extremely sick and medically complex patients, and it is uncertain whether the chosen anesthetic might exacerbate neurologic problems. Here, we discuss the implications for the anesthetic management of PRES presentations.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome and Pre-eclampsia/Eclampsia: Anesthetic Implications and Management

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare neurologic disorder that has recently become more frequently diagnosed. While the exact etiology of PRES remains unclear, multiple diseases are associated with PRES. Moreover, there is increasing recognition of the association of PRES in pre-eclampsia/eclampsia with advancements in imaging techniques and increased awareness of the disorder. While pre-eclampsia/eclampsia alone presents unique perioperative challenges, PRES further complicates anesthetic management. Unfortunately, the anesthetic management for these critically ill and complex patients is not well elucidated and it is unclear whether the anesthetic choice may actually worsen neurologic symptoms. We describe two different presentations of PRES with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, their anesthetic implications, and management.

A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension

Background

Local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in one-single injection are known to induce more severe hypotension than a fractionated dose in healthy obstetric patients. Hypotension in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia, during spinal anesthesia, could compromise fetal well-being.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the mean arterial pressure (MAP), the total dose of ephedrine required, and level of sensory blockade between the fractionated-dose and single-dose spinal anesthesia injection in obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent a cesarean section.

Methods

This single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted from January to April 2018 after being approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Indonesia (No. 1174/UN2.F1/ETIK/2017) and recorded at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03693638). After obtaining informed consent, 42 parturients with hypertension in pregnancy (gestational hypertension or preeclampsia), ASA II-III, aged 18 - 40 years, and BMI of 18.5 - 35 kg/m² with singleton pregnancy, who were planned for spinal anesthesia for emergency or semi-emergency cesarean section with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (Marcaine^TM, Hospira) and fentanyl, were included in this study. All subjects were randomly divided into two groups including fractionated-dose (FD) and single-dose (SD).

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups in MAP in the first 15 minutes after anesthesia (P > 0.05) and median total dose of ephedrine required (10 (0 - 25) mg in the FD group vs. 15 (0 - 30) mg in the SD group, P = 0.30). However, in the FD group, MAP tended to be higher in the first three minutes compared to the SD group. The level of sensory blockade was mostly at T4, which was not significantly different between the groups (52.4% in FD vs. 42.9% in SD, P = 0.59).

Conclusions

In obstetric patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension who underwent a cesarean section, the mean arterial pressure after spinal anesthesia was not significantly different between the fractionated dose of spinal anesthesia injection and single-dose injection. Total ephedrine required and levels of sensory blockade were not significantly different between the groups.

Anesthetic management of a patient presenting with eclampsia

Eclampsia is one of the most common emergencies encountered by anesthesiologists which involve a safe journey of two lives. The definition, etiology, pathophysiology, treatment guidelines along with a special reference to management of labour pain and caesarean section are discussed. Eclampsia is commonly faced challenging case in our day to day anaesthesia practice,but less is discussed in our anaesthesia text books. Lot of controversies with regard to fluid management and monitoring still remain unanswered

Blutungen während der Schwangerschaft

Hemorrhaging during pregnancy is often fulminant and life-threatening for mother and child. Of maternal deaths occurring during pregnancy, 25% are caused by hemorrhaging. All physicians involved in the interdisciplinary treatment of hemorrhaging during pregnancy need to be familiar with the specific pathophysiology of hemostatic changes during pregnancy, e.g. elevated hemostatic capacity, reduced anti-coagulation activity and severe alterations of the fibrinolysis system. Therapists must be able to perform a consequent, goal-directed interdisciplinary approach to prevent adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. The major issues of therapy are causal obstetric treatment of the bleeding, early detection and therapy of hyperfibrinolysis, optimization of fibrinogen and platelet levels and knowledge of the possibilities of a targeted coagulation therapy.

Brief review: anesthetic implications of long QT syndrome in pregnancy

PURPOSE

To review the effects of the long QT syndrome (LQTS) in the parturient and the current anesthetic management of patients with LQTS.

SOURCE

Relevant articles were obtained from a MEDLINE search spanning the years 1980-2006 and a PubMed search spanning the years 1949-2006. Bibliographies of retrieved articles were searched for additional articles.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The prevalence of LQTS in the developed world is one per 1,100 to 3,000 of the population. Clinically, LQTS is characterized by syncope, cardiac arrest and occasionally, by a history of seizures. The QT interval can also be prolonged by drugs, electrolyte imbalances, toxins and certain medical conditions. Long QT syndrome patients are at risk of torsades de pointes and ventricular fibrillation. Medical management aims to reduce dysrhythmia frequency. The LQTS is subdivided into different groups (LQT1-6) depending on the cardiac ion channel abnormality. Torsades can be precipitated by adrenergic stimuli such as stress or pain (LQT1 and 2), sudden noises (LQT2) or whilst sleeping (LQT3). Patients with LQTS require careful anesthetic management as they are at high risk of torsades perioperatively despite minimal data on the effects of anesthetic agents on the QT interval. While information on effects of LQTS in pregnancy is limited, the incidence of dysrhythmia increases postpartum. Isolated case reports of patients with LQTS women highlight several peripartum dysrhythmias.

CONCLUSION

An understanding of LQTS and the associated risk factors contributing to dysrhythmias is important for anesthesthesiologists caring for parturients with LQTS.

The Effects of Spinal Anesthesia on QT Interval in Preeclamptic Patients

In this study, we measured the effects of spinal anesthesia on the corrected QT (QTc) interval in women with severe preeclampsia. Twenty-five preeclamptic (preeclamptic group) and 25 healthy pregnant women with normal arterial blood pressure and QTc interval (control group) were enrolled in this prospective, case-controlled study. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and QTc interval values were obtained before (baseline value) and at 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, and 120 min after initiation of spinal anesthesia. Total ephedrine dose, time elapsed until sensory block, and Apgar scores were recorded. Prior to spinal anesthesia, QTc interval values were significantly higher in the preeclamptic group (452 +/- 17.5 ms) when compared with that in controls (376 +/- 21.4 ms). Although the QTc interval shortened during spinal anesthesia when compared with baseline value in the preeclamptic group (P < 0.05), it showed no significant change in the control group. In conclusion, the QTc interval may be prolonged in severe preeclamptic patients who have hypertension and hypocalcemia. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery may normalize that prolonged QTc interval due to sympathetic blockade.

Airway problems in pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

To provide a current review of the literature regarding airway problems in pregnancy and management.

BACKGROUND

Obstetrical anesthesia is considered to be a high-risk practice that exposes the anesthesiologist to increased medicolegal liability. Anesthetic management of a parturient is a challenge because it involves simultaneous care of both mother and baby. Failure to appropriately manage a difficult or failed intubation increases the risk of hypoxemic cardiopulmonary arrest and/or pulmonary aspiration, resulting in a high probability of maternal morbidity and mortality.

DATA

Anesthesia is the seventh leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States. Anatomic and physiologic changes during pregnancy place the parturient at increased risk for airway management problems. It is essential to perform a thorough preanesthetic evaluation and identify the factors predictive of difficult intubation. Airway devices such as the laryngeal mask airway, ProSeal, intubating laryngeal mask airway, Combitube, and laryngeal tube are described and have been used during failed intubation in pregnant patients.

CONCLUSION

Teamwork between an anesthesiologist and an obstetrician is absolutely essential for the safety of both the mother and baby. Most of us tend to agree that airway emergencies have a way of occurring at the worst possible times. It is essential that all anesthesia care practitioners must have a preconceived and well thought-out algorithm and emergency airway equipment to deal with airway emergencies during difficult or failed intubation of a parturient.

What’s new and novel in obstetric anesthesia? Contributions from the 2003 scientific literature

THE PREGNANT PATIENT: Age; maternal disease; prophylactic antibiotics; gastroesophageal reflux; obesity; starvation; genotyping; coagulopathy; infection; substance abuse; altered drug responses in pregnancy; physiological changes of pregnancy. THE FETUS: Fetal monitoring; intrauterine surgery. THE NEWBORN: Breastfeeding; maternal infection, fever, and neonatal sepsis evaluation. OBSTETRIC COMPLICATIONS: Embolic phenomena; hemorrhage; preeclampsia; preterm delivery. OBSTETRIC MANAGEMENT: External cephalic version and cervical cerclage; elective cesarean delivery; fetal malpresentation; vaginal birth after cesarean delivery; termination of pregnancy. OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA: Analgesia for labor and delivery; anesthesia for cesarean delivery; anesthesia for short obstetric operations; complications of anesthesia. MISCELLANEOUS: Consent; ethics; history; labor support; websites/books/leaflets/journal announcements.

Anesthetic management of Cesarean delivery in a patient with hypoplastic anemia and severe pre-eclampsia

PURPOSE

To describe the anesthetic management of Cesarean delivery in a patient with hypoplastic anemia and severe pre-eclampsia.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 28-yr-old parturient with a history of thrombocytopenia was admitted with signs of pre-eclampsia (blood pressure of 140/90 mmHg, heavy proteinuria and moderate bilateral ankle edema) at 25 weeks of gestation. Laboratory studies revealed pancy-topenia (hemoglobin 6.4 g.dL(-1), white cell count 3.43 x 10(9).L(-1), platelet count 20 x 10(9).L(-1)) and bone marrow biopsy showed hypoplastic anemia. As pre-eclampsia worsened, a Cesarean delivery was performed at 27 weeks with prophylactic platelet transfusion and meticulous blood pressure control. The procedure was uneventful, conducted under general anesthesia with an estimated blood loss of around 600 mL and a live female baby was delivered. Postoperatively her blood pressure and neurological symptoms improved but thrombocytopenia remained at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypoplastic anemia is rare in pregnancy but it poses an increased risk for both mother and fetus. The mother is at risk of life-threatening episodes of bleeding and infection and a multidisciplinary team approach (obstetrician, anesthesiologist, hematologist and pediatrician) is essential. An accurate assessment of the hematological condition should be made and abnormalities corrected before surgery. Regional anesthesia may not be possible in this circumstance.

Airway problems in pregnancy

Obstetric anesthesia is considered to be a difficult, high-risk practice that exposes the anesthesiologist to increased medicolegal liability. Anesthetic management of parturient patients is a challenge, as it involves simultaneous care of two lives. The anesthesia practitioner has a duty to provide safe anesthetic care, including effective airway management when providing regional or general anesthesia. The potential need to manipulate the airway is perhaps the leading cause of concern among obstetric anesthesiologists.