Barriers to preventive intervention

Noncompliance in cancer screening trials

Background Randomized trials evaluating new cancer screening technologies may underestimate the efficacy of screening to reduce cancer mortality if study participants are noncompliant. Participants may fail to comply with the screening itself or fail to obtain appropriate diagnostic follow-up and treatment. Noncompliance with screening has drawn wide attention, but little attention has been paid to noncompliance with diagnostic follow-up and treatment.

Purpose To examine the importance of noncompliance with screening, follow-up, and treatment in cancer screening trials.

Methods The unique problems associated with noncompliance in screening trials are described and provide an example illustrating the potential impact of noncompliance in a screening trial. I discuss issues that arise with measurement of follow-up and therapeutic noncompliance, and the benefit of collecting information on health system and participant characteristics associated with noncompliance.

Results The estimate of the efficacy of a screening program on cancer mortality can be adjusted for screening, follow-up, and treatment noncompliance. Noncompliance needs to be measured in a rigorous, systematic manner across all arms of the trial. Information on health system and participant characteristics associated with compliance may also be incorporated into statistical models to estimate screening effects with full compliance, plan interventions to increase compliance, and extrapolate results of screening trials from one population to another.

Limitations Measuring compliance with follow-up and treatment can be difficult when these occur outside the trial, and when there is variation among providers in follow-up and treatment practices.

Conclusions Noncompliance may alter the estimate of a screening effect on cancer mortality in clinical trials. It is possible to adjust screening efficacy estimates for noncompliance using existing statistical techniques. It is important that data describing compliance with screening, follow-up, and treatment are collected as part of standard data collection in cancer screening trials. Clinical Trials 2007; 4: 341—349. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Longitudinal predictors of adherence to annual follow-up in a lung cancer screening programme

OBJECTIVE

To examine rates and factors associated with adherence to annual repeat lung cancer screening in two cohorts. Participants and methods The self-pay cohort (n = 2083) was individuals aged 40 years and older with no prior cancer and a smoking history. Participants had to obtain a prescription from their doctor for the low dose, computerized tomography scan (CT), and were responsible for payment of $300 as these CT scans are not typically covered by insurance. The no-pay cohort (n = 1304) was individuals aged 60 and older with a smoking history, and no prior cancer. The initial and one year repeat CT were provided free of charge. Rates of adherence for each cohort were analyzed by demographic variables, smoking history, family history of lung cancer, smoking status (former/current), perceived risk and worry of getting lung cancer and baseline screening CT.

RESULTS

Adherence to annual follow-up was lower for the self-pay than for the no-pay cohort (62% vs. 88%). Both the self-pay and no-pay cohorts had higher adherence rates among Caucasians and those who had a college degree. A greater perceived risk of getting lung cancer increased adherence among the self-pay cohort. Non-calcified nodules found on baseline CT increased the adherence for the self-pay cohort, but decreased the adherence for the no-pay cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings should be used in developing educational materials and targeted retention strategies to increase adherence with repeat lung cancer screening.

Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors

While patient barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have been identified, how well this knowledge is utilized during the patient-physician interaction is not fully understood. This study aims to assess among primary care physicians the degree of consensus between perceived and actual patients' CRC screening decision-making influential factors. During 2004-2006, 30 patients were interviewed to identify factors influencing screening decisions and 66 physicians were interviewed to understand what factors they thought were important to patients. The factors were categorized using the PRECEDE-PROCEED framework, and perspectives were compared. The researchers found little consensus on CRC screening decision-making influential factors between family practitioners, general internists, and patients. The recommendations to reach consensus are provided on the individual (e.g., updating the contents of a physician's screening recommendation to proactively address patients' decision-making needs) and population (e.g., providing cross-cultural training to medical students enabling them to better understand their patients) levels.

Pecuniary compensation increases participation in screening for colorectal cancer

The participation rate in medical screening programmes is typically below 100%, which means that not all potential health benefits are fully exploited. In this paper, the prospect of pecuniary compensation is tested as a method of increasing the participation rate. We propose a model explaining the individual's probability of participating in screening for colorectal cancer when he is offered pecuniary compensation, given that he did not participate when first invited. The participant's decision is based on both known and uncertain factors. The estimation is conducted in two steps, where a binary probit model is used in each. We find that pecuniary compensation increases the probability of participation, and that an individual's participation probability systematically varies with variables such as travel expenses, income, age, education level, expected benefit from the screening, use of health-care services, genetic predisposition and subjective health status. Using the results from the estimation, we predict changes in the participation rate for different levels of compensation and estimate the cost per additional individual screened. The cost per additional individual screened is 808, including 25 in compensation; this cost increases with the level of compensation.

Appointments timed in proximity to annual milestones and compliance with screening: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether appointments for screening timed in proximity to annual milestones (birthdays, Christmas and New Year) may be used as a strategy to improve attendance for screening for colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

City of Oslo (urban) and Telemark county (urban and rural), Norway.

PARTICIPANTS

12,960 screened adults (64.7% of those invited).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Attendance rates for each week and month of assigned appointment.

RESULTS

Attendance rates were significantly higher in December than the rest of the year (72.3% v 64.6%, P<0.001) in adults who received an invitation in the week of their birthday or were assigned to screening in the first or second week after their birthday (67.9% v 64.5%, P=0.007). This effect was most pronounced in the urban population of Oslo. In a multivariable logistic regression model, attendance improved in those who received an invitation in the week of their birthday or were assigned to screening in the first or second week after their birthday (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.28) and those who were assigned to screening in December (odds ratio 1.45, 1.16 to 1.82).

CONCLUSION

Attendance rates for screening for colorectal cancer were higher in December and around attendees' birthdays, the latter particularly in an urban population. Compliance with screening programmes may therefore be improved by timing invitations in proximity to annual milestones.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials NCT00119912.

The public prefers fecal occult blood test over colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening

The acceptability of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests to the population influences adherence. Population preferences between fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy for CRC screening were examined by previous test experience. The study population was a random sample of 413 members of Israel's largest Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) aged 48-68 years. In a telephone interview, an explanation was provided regarding FOBT and colonoscopy. Participants were asked which they preferred and their degree (1-6) of agreement with each of eight test characteristics. Overall Attitude Scores toward FOBT and colonoscopy were compared. Predictors of colonoscopy preference and of refusal to undergo screening were examined using a logistic regression model. FOBT was preferred as a screening test by 70.2% of the participants, colonoscopy by 9.3%, 7.4% were indecisive, and 13.1% were not interested in screening. FOBT and colonoscopy similarly scored highly as life saving (5.2 vs. 5.1, respectively), with colonoscopy scoring significantly higher as time consuming (3.8 vs. 1.3, P<0.0001), disturbing (4.6 vs. 1.8, P<0.0001), painful (4.1 vs. 1.0, P<0.0001), annoying (4.8 vs. 1.9, P<0.0001), and involving risk (3.2 vs. 1.0, P<0.0001). In a logistic multivariate analysis, preference of colonoscopy was associated with the perception of being at CRC risk [odds ratio (OR): 3.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-7.6)], with more positive attitude scores towards this test [OR: 2.2 (95% CI: 1.6-3.0)], and with a more negative one toward FOBT [OR: 0.4 (95% CI: 0.3-0.7)]. Target population preferences for CRC screening supports a policy of FOBT screening for an average risk population and colonoscopy for high-risk individuals.

Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study

The aim of this study was to analyse the role of women's sociodemographic and healthcare access characteristics according to breast cancer screening practices (organized, individual or no screening). A cross-sectional study was set up in seven French districts using a self-administered postal questionnaire. Randomization was stratified proportionally on age and urban/rural status in each district separately among attendees and nonattendees to the organized breast cancer screening programme (OS). A total of 5638 women aged 50-74 years returned their questionnaires: 1480 in the attendee OS group and 4158 in the nonattendee group. Among them, 3537 declared having undergone a recent mammography outside the organized programme (individual, IS group) and 621 declared never having undergone a mammography or having done so more than 2 years ago (NS group). Analyses showed a gradient between the three groups (IS, OS and NS, respectively) in their association with breast cancer screening practices considering three factors: an increasing gradient was observed for renunciation of basic healthcare for financial reasons, a decreasing gradient in the regular visit to a medical gynaecologist and having had a Pap smear in the last 3 years. Three other variables that showed a decreasing gradient are: living with a partner, current use of hormone replacement therapy and having had a check-up in the last 5 years. In conclusion, the main differences between breast cancer screening practices were largely associated with difficulties in healthcare access, considering regular gynaecological visits in particular.

Orchestrating key personnel to increase colorectal cancer awareness at the worksite

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of deaths due to cancer for both men and women in the United States. Screening promotes the early detection of colorectal cancer and reduces the morbidity and mortality rates. Worksite wellness programs are an effective way to promote colorectal cancer prevention and screening awareness and compliance with the American Cancer Society's screening guidelines, and they provide several advantages from the perspectives of the employees, employers, and nurses. This article explains how to orchestrate key personnel to increase colorectal cancer awareness in the worksite. A review of evidence-based literature is utilized to maximize the effectiveness of these worksite education sessions. The goals for the worksite employees are to resolve their individual barriers through education, to commit to colorectal cancer screening and prevention, and to feel a sense of obligation to follow through on their plans.

Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey

The aim of this study was to analyse the independent role of socio-demographic factors on the use of mammography according to whether or not an organized breast cancer screening programme exists. The study sample of 2825 women aged 40-74 years was drawn from a cross-sectional population-based survey of French households. Among these women 46% lived in districts that offered a screening programme and 63% reported undergoing mammography in the previous 2 years. Living in a district that offered a screening programme was associated with increased use of mammography. According to both univariate and multivariate analysis, several socio-demographic characteristics, such as high monthly household income or high education level, increased the probability of using mammography. However, three factors had a major positive impact on its use: (1) having had a gynaecological examination in the previous 2 years, (2) living in a district where a screening programme was available, and (3) age. There was a significant interaction between the factors 2 and 3. Between 40 and 60 years, age had the same impact on the use of mammography whether or not women lived in a district with a screening programme. After the age of 60 years, the use of mammography collapsed among women living in a district without a screening programme and remained frequent among women living in the district that offered such a programme. Even if the overall level of mammography screening was high and the existence of a screening programme maintained a high level of mammography use among older women, the programme should target better the women of underprivileged spheres and reinforce the role of the general practitioner; in particular for women not followed by a gynaecologist.

Repeat colonoscopy has a low yield even in symptomatic patients

BACKGROUND

In many regions, the demand for colonoscopy exceeds its availability. Patients undergoing repeat examinations comprise a significant proportion of those on waiting lists.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the yield of repeat colonoscopy in varied clinical settings.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Endoscopic database of an Australian tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Adults who had >/=2 colonoscopies between 1992 and 2004. Patients were excluded if the repeat procedure was for completion or for high-risk surveillance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Yield for neoplasia by indication, interval to repeat examination, and appropriateness for surveillance (determined by National Australian guidelines).

RESULTS

A total of 4974 colonoscopies in 2075 patients were studied. The mean age was 63.1 years (range, 19.2-92.4 years). The mean number of examinations was 2.4 (range, 2-8), with a mean interval between examinations of 2.9 years. Colorectal cancer (CRC) was significantly more prevalent at initial colonoscopy compared with subsequent colonoscopies (7.9% vs 0.6%; prevalence ratio 14.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5-23.7, P < .001), as were advanced adenomas (15.3% vs 4.8%; prevalence ratio 3.2, 95% CI 2.6-3.9, P < .001). No CRCs were detected in symptomatic patients undergoing polyp surveillance examinations performed before the recommended interval.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Yield of repeat colonoscopy is significantly lower than for initial colonoscopy, irrespective of indication. In symptomatic patients within a polyp surveillance program, the yield is negligible when a colonoscopy is performed before the recommended surveillance interval. The need for a repeat colonoscopy should be carefully considered, and patients who have never had a colonoscopy must take priority on waiting lists over those awaiting repeat examinations.

Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Screening

The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to evaluate the effects of a Health Belief Model-based colorectal cancer (CRC) education session on adult participants. Education sessions were conducted at a site chosen by the participants, such as their homes, in a mid-sized, mid-Western city. Thirty-one Caucasian adults participated. Eleven were men (35%) and 20 were women (65%). Study results reveal that the education sessions were an effective way to promote awareness of CRC prevention and screening. The participants' responses reflected a positive and significant (p < .0001) improvement in all areas except beliefs regarding maintenance of a healthy weight (p = .0574). The greatest effect was on men, current smokers, and those with a high school education or less. Education sessions were equally effective for auditory and visual learners. The 31 participants planned to share the information with at least 32 other individuals. The participants acquired an increased awareness of CRC prevention and screening. Willingness to discuss CRC after the education sessions may be significant, especially because the others may, in turn, share the information. Nurses need to be aware of CRC screening guidelines. The impact of patient teaching on this health promotion effort may reach beyond the patients who were in contact with the nurses. Public awareness might be further increased when patients share this information with others.

Promoting Community Awareness of the Need for Colorectal Cancer Screening

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if a community education program based on the Health Belief Model effectively promotes awareness of the need for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention and screening. An education program was given to 20 employees of an accounting firm in a midwestern city. A survey evaluated the participants' beliefs about CRC, before and after the presentation. The results support a significant increase in the belief that CRC is preventable, and in 5 of 6 screening factors from the Health Belief Model. Participants were encouraged to share what they learned and reported that they anticipate sharing with at least 31 others. A screening questionnaire was distributed as a "cue to action" to discuss CRC screening with their physicians. Participants' intention to discuss CRC with their physicians also increased. The actual effectiveness will be evaluated with 11 participants who volunteered for a 1-year follow-up study. This community education concept had several advantages, including simultaneous access to many participants who share personal testimonials and who invite peers to become screened. The program was effective in increasing awareness of the need for CRC prevention and screening, even beyond those in attendance. The results of the 1-year follow-up study may provide more insight to what education factors promote screening most effectively.

Lifestyle characteristics among participants in a Norwegian colorectal cancer screening trial

The aim of the present study was to evaluate to what extent lifestyle-related variables predict participation for flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening when the compliance is relatively high. During 2001, a randomized sample of 6961 men and women, born between 1946 and 1950, were invited to have a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening examination. Attendees (n = 4111) were asked to fill in a questionnaire focusing on physical activity, body weight, smoking habits and diet. The questionnaire was sent by mail to non-attendees (n = 2628) and a randomized corresponding control group not invited to screening (n = 7000). Sixty-one percent attended for screening. The questionnaire response rate among attendees, non-attendees and controls was 97, 11 and 61%, respectively. Attendees were more physically active (P < 0.001), and showed more adherence to general dietary recommendations, compared with controls. Opposing their healthy exercise and dietary habits, however, attendees were more likely to be moderate smokers compared with controls. The present offer of FS screening, achieving a relatively high compliance rate, may have reached attendees using screening as a supplement to an already healthy lifestyle, but also those who seek amelioration through health checks for risks behaviour that they are perfectly well aware of, such as smoking.

Chronic osteoarthritis and adherence to exercise: a review of the literature

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease that disables many aging adults. People with OA are often asked to adhere to prescribed exercise regimens that must be undertaken in the presence of pain and other disease-related symptoms. We conducted a review of literature that focused on what is known about exercise adherence and the factors that influence exercise adherence among people with OA. Results revealed multiple determinants of exercise adherence; however, these determinants have not been carefully studied in the context of exercise adherence and OA. Almost all studies of exercise adherence among people with OA are short-term and do not use validated measures of adherence. Moreover, poor adherence is the most compelling explanation for the declining impact of the benefits of exercise over time. We conclude that interventions to enhance self-efficacy, social support, and skills in long-term monitoring of progress are necessary to foster exercise adherence among people with OA.

Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer

Genetic counseling may turn risk information into cancer prevention behavior by modifying health beliefs and cancer-related distress. We assessed the effect of genetic counseling on these factors in 101 adult first-degree-relatives of colorectal cancer patients from families with known or suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Before counseling and once afterward, subjects completed self-report measures of perceived lifetime risk and cancer-distress. Most persons overestimated their cancer risk, and higher perceived risk was associated with believing that colorectal cancer cannot be prevented. Individual perceived risk changed after counseling, although mean perceived risk was unchanged. After adjusting for baseline risk, older persons and those with higher estimated objective cancer risk had larger postcounseling decreases. Distress after counseling was positively correlated with baseline distress and anxiety symptoms, and inversely correlated with tolerance for ambiguity. The findings suggest counseling interventions that should increase the likelihood of screening and offer hypotheses for future research.

Identifying opportunities for improved colorectal cancer screening in primary care

BACKGROUND

Although current recommendations advocate screening persons 50 years of age or older for colorectal cancer (CRC), actual screening practice is highly variable among primary care physicians (PCPs). Knowledge of the factors that influence whether or not screening is offered during a clinic visit is essential to develop effective screening strategies.

METHODS

A cross-sectional telephone survey of one in four randomly selected patients aged 50 years or older (n = 400) attending a primary care clinic within an integrated health care system in central Texas was conducted. A survey of all PCPs (n = 32) at the practice sites was also administered.

RESULTS

The visit type was an important determinant of whether CRC screening was discussed, with most discussion occurring during visits for physicals (P < 0.0001). This finding was corroborated by the physician survey. Patient age and education were also associated with a higher likelihood of having been offered CRC screening (P = 0.009 and 0.014, respectively). Patient race, gender, primary language, PCP, or clinics attended were not significantly associated with the discussion of CRC screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Discussions regarding CRC screening are most likely to occur during preventive care visits. Thus, facilitating preventive visits especially for the elderly represents an opportunity to improve CRC screening rates in primary care practice.

Barriers to endoscopic colorectal cancer screening: are women different from men?

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to compare women and men's understanding of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and to identify predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

METHODS

We mailed a 36-item questionnaire to asymptomatic patients aged 50 years or older who were scheduled for routine health assessments at a large multispecialty health-care group. Data collection included demographics, health behaviors, psychosocial factors, and CRC screening compliance. We followed participants for 1 year and assessed completion of endoscopic CRC screening. Both cross-sectional results examining previous screening and prospective results examining screening 1 year later were evaluated.

RESULTS

554 (54%) of 998 patients responded to the survey. Responses of 13 patients were excluded in the analyses due to unverifiable screening outcome. The majority of the respondents were white, and their average age was 62 years. Women reported significantly more embarrassment and fear about having FS than men. Women were more willing to consider having a FS if a female endoscopist performed the procedure. Of the 334 participants who were eligible to have endoscopic CRC screening, 53 (16%) had the procedure within a year. The odds of having the endoscopic procedures increased with the length of time the patients were under the care of their primary care providers and how strongly patients believed that one should have an FS even without symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest some unique gender-specific attitudes and beliefs that act as potential barriers for CRC screening and further support the important role of primary care providers in facilitating timely completion of screening.