Nitric oxide inhibition of free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation in photodynamically treated membranes and cells

Upregulation of iNOS/NO in Cancer Cells That Survive a Photodynamic Challenge: Role of No in Accelerated Cell Migration and Invasion

Anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a unique modality that employs a photosensitizer (PS), PS-exciting light, and O2 to generate cytotoxic oxidants. For various reasons, not all malignant cells in any given tumor will succumb to a PDT challenge. Previous studies by the authors revealed that nitric oxide (NO) from inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) plays a key role in tumor cell resistance and also stimulation of migratory/invasive aggressiveness of surviving cells. iNOS was the only NOS isoform implicated in these effects. Significantly, NO from stress-upregulated iNOS was much more important in this regard than NO from preexisting enzymes. Greater NO-dependent resistance, migration, and invasion was observed with at least three different cancer cell lines, and this was attenuated by iNOS activity inhibitors, NO scavengers, or an iNOS transcriptional inhibitor. NO diffusing from PDT-targeted cells also stimulated migration/invasion potency of non-targeted bystander cells. Unless counteracted by appropriate measures, all these effects could seriously compromise clinical PDT efficacy. Here, we will review specific examples of these negative side effects of PDT and how they might be suppressed by adjuvants such as NO scavengers or inhibitors of iNOS activity or expression.

Role of nitric oxide in hyper-aggressiveness of tumor cells that survive various anti-cancer therapies

Low level nitric oxide (NO) produced by inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in many malignant tumors is known to play a key role in the survival and proliferation of tumor cells. NO can also induce or augment resistance to anti-tumor treatments such as platinum-based chemotherapy (CT), ionizing radiotherapy (RT), and non-ionizing photodynamic therapy (PDT). In each of these treatments, tumor cells that survive the challenge may exhibit a striking increase in NO-dependent proliferative, migratory, and invasive aggressiveness compared with non-challenged controls. Moreover, NO from cells directly targeted by PDT can often stimulate aggressiveness in non- or poorly targeted bystander cells. Although NO-mediated resistance to many of these therapies is fairly-well recognized by now, the hyper-aggressiveness of surviving cells and bystander counterparts is not. We will focus on these negative aspects in this review, citing examples from the PDT, CT, and RT publications. Increased aggressiveness of cells that escape therapeutic elimination is a concern because it could enhance tumor progression and metastatic dissemination. Pharmacologic approaches for suppressing these negative responses will also be discussed, e.g., administering inhibitors of iNOS activity or iNOS expression as therapeutic adjuvants.

Photodynamic Therapy as an Oxidative Anti-Tumor Modality: Negative Effects of Nitric Oxide on Treatment Efficacy

Anti-tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a unique oxidative stress-based modality that has proven highly effective on a variety of solid malignancies. PDT is minimally invasive and generates cytotoxic oxidants such as singlet molecular oxygen (¹O₂). With high tumor site-specificity and limited off-target negative effects, PDT is increasingly seen as an attractive alternative or follow-up to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived bioactive free radical molecule that is exploited by many malignant tumors to promote cell survival, proliferation, and metastatic expansion. Typically generated endogenously by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2), low level NO can also antagonize many therapeutic interventions, including PDT. In addition to elevating resistance, iNOS-derived NO can stimulate growth and migratory aggressiveness of tumor cells that survive a PDT challenge. Moreover, NO from PDT-targeted cells in any given population is known to promote such aggressiveness in non-targeted counterparts (bystanders). Each of these negative responses to PDT and their possible underlying mechanisms will be discussed in this chapter. Promising pharmacologic approaches for mitigating these NO-mediated responses will also be discussed.

Nitric Oxide-elicited Resistance to Antitumor Photodynamic Therapy via Inhibition of Membrane Free Radical-mediated Lipid Peroxidation

This review focuses on the ability of nitric oxide (NO) to antagonize antitumor photodynamic therapy (PDT). NO's anti-PDT effects were recognized relatively recently and require a better mechanistic understanding for developing new strategies to improve PDT efficacy. Many PDT sensitizers (PSs) are amphiphilic and tend to localize in membrane compartments of tumor cells. Unsaturated lipids in these compartments can undergo peroxidative degradation after PS photoactivation. Primary Type I (free radical) vs. Type II (singlet oxygen) photochemistry of lipid peroxidation is discussed, along with light-independent turnover of primary lipid hydroperoxides to free radical species. Chain lipid peroxidation mediated by the latter exacerbates membrane damage and cytotoxicity after a PDT challenge. Our studies have shown that NO from chemical donors can suppress chain peroxidation by intercepting lipid-derived free radical intermediates, thereby protecting cancer cells against photokilling. More recent evidence has revealed that inducible NO synthase (iNOS) is dramatically upregulated in several cancer cell types after a photodynamic challenge, and that iNOS-derived NO enhances resistance as well as growth and migratory aggressiveness of surviving cells. Chain breaking by NO and other possible NO-based resistance mechanisms are discussed, along with novel pharmacologic approaches for overcoming these negative effects.

Nitric Oxide Inhibition of Chain Lipid Peroxidation Initiated by Photodynamic Action in Membrane Environments

Iron-catalyzed, free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation may play a major role in tumor cell killing by photodynamic therapy (PDT), particularly when membrane-localizing photosensitizers are employed. Many cancer cells exploit endogenous iNOS-generated NO for pro-survival/expansion purposes and for hyper-resistance to therapeutic modalities, including PDT. In addition to inhibiting the pro-oxidant activity of Fe(II) via nitrosylation, NO may intercept downstream lipid oxyl and peroxyl radicals, thereby acting as a chain-breaking antioxidant. We investigated this for the first time in the context of PDT by using POPC/Ch/PpIX (100:80:0.2 by mol) liposomes (LUVs) as a model system. Cholesterol (Ch or [¹⁴C]Ch) served as an in-situ peroxidation probe and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) as photosensitizer. PpIX-sensitized lipid peroxidation was monitored by two analytical methods that we developed: HPLC-EC(Hg) and HPTLC-PI. 5α-hydroperoxy-Ch (5α-OOH) accumulated rapidly and linearly with irradiation time, indicating singlet oxygen (¹O₂) intermediacy. When ascorbate (AH^-) and trace lipophilic iron [Fe(HQ)₃] were included, 7α/7β-hydroperoxy-Ch (7-OOH) accumulated exponentially, indicating progressively greater membrane-damaging chain lipid peroxidation. With AH^-/Fe(HQ)₃ present, the NO donor SPNO had no effect on 5α-OOH formation, but dose-dependently inhibited 7-OOH formation due to NO interception of chain-carrying oxyl and peroxyl radicals. Similar results were obtained when cancer cells were PpIX/light-treated, using SPNO or activated macrophages as the NO source. These findings implicate chain lipid peroxidation in PDT-induced cytotoxicity and NO as a potent antagonist thereof by acting as a chain-breaking antioxidant. Thus, unless NO formation in aggressive tumors is suppressed, it can clearly compromise PDT efficacy.

Upregulation of pro-tumor nitric oxide by anti-tumor photodynamic therapy

Many malignant tumors use endogenous nitric oxide (NO) to promote survival, growth, and metastatic migration. This NO, which is typically generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), can also antagonize various anti-cancer therapies and its source is most often assumed to be constitutive or pre-existing iNOS. In this paper, we provide evidence (i) that many different cancer cells exhibit resistance to oxidative killing by photodynamic therapy (PDT), and (ii) that cells surviving the challenge grow, migrate and invade more aggressively, as do non-targeted bystander cells. Accompanying these effects are activation or upregulation of pro-survival/progression effector proteins such as NF-κB, Akt, and Survivin. Observed in the author's laboratory, these responses were not attributed to basal iNOS/NO in most cases, but rather to NO from enzyme that was strongly upregulated by photodynamic stress. Each of these effects and how they can be mitigated by inhibitors of iNOS activity or transcription, or by NO scavengers will be discussed. When approved for clinical use, such pharmacologic agents could improve PDT efficacy as well as reduce potentially negative side-effects of this therapy.

Nitric Oxide-Mediated Resistance to Antitumor Photodynamic Therapy

As an antitumor modality based on sensitizer photoexcitation by tumor-directed light, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has the advantage of being site-specific compared with conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Like these other therapies, however, PDT is often limited by pre-existing or acquired resistance. One type of resistance, discovered in the author's laboratory, involves nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in tumor cells. Using human breast, prostate and brain cancer cell lines, we have shown that iNOS is dramatically upregulated after a moderate PDT challenge sensitized by 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX. The elevated NO not only elicited a greater resistance to cell photokilling, but also an increase in the growth and migration/invasion rate of surviving cells. Greater iNOS/NO-based resistance was also demonstrated at the in vivo level using a breast tumor xenograft model. More recent studies have shown that NO from PDT-targeted cells can stimulate a progrowth/promigration response in non-targeted bystander cells. These novel effects of NO, their negative impact on PDT efficacy and possible mitigation thereof by anti-iNOS/NO pharmacologic agents will be discussed.

Evaluation of cell damage and modulation of cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 in macrophages exposed to PpIX-mediated photodynamic therapy

Little is known regarding whether photodynamic therapy (PDT)-induced cell death can substantially compromise macrophages (MΦ), which are important cells in PDT-induced immune responses. Here, parameters of PDT-mediated MΦ cytotoxicity and cytokine production in response to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) were evaluated. Peritoneal MΦ from BALB/c mice were stimulated in vitro with PDT, light, PpIX, or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). After that, cell viability, lipid peroxidation, Nitric Oxide (NO), DNA damage, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 were evaluated. Short PDT exposure reduced cell viability by 10-30%. There was a two-fold increase in NO and DNA degradation, despite the non-increase in lipoperoxidation. PDT increased TNF-α and IL-10, particularly in the presence of LPS, and decreased the production of IL-6 to 10-fold. PDT causes cellular stress, induces NO radicals and leads to DNA degradation, generating a cytotoxic microenvironment. Furthermore, PDT modulates pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in MΦ.

Molecular pathways in cancer response to photodynamic therapy

This minireview describes the complexity of the molecular mechanisms involved in the tumor response to photodynamic treatment (PDT). Different aspects of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) induced by PDT will be examined. In particular, we will discuss the effect of ROS and RNS on cell compartments and the main mechanisms of cell death induced by the treatment. Moreover, we will also examine host defense mechanisms as well as resistance to PDT.

Upregulation of nitric oxide in tumor cells as a negative adaptation to photodynamic therapy

One of the advantages of PDT is that it can often circumvent tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin and doxorubicin. However, pre-existing and acquired resistance to PDT has also been demonstrated. One type of resistance, which involves nitric oxide (NO) generated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/NOS2) in tumor cells, was discovered in the author's laboratory. When subjected to a 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic challenge, several cancer lines, including breast, prostate, and glioma, underwent intrinsic apoptosis that could be substantially enhanced by iNOS enzymatic inhibitors or a NO scavenger, implying iNOS/NO-mediated resistance. In most cases, iNOS was significantly upregulated by the challenge and this appeared to be more important in the hyper-resistance than pre-existing enzyme. Of added importance was our observation that cells surviving ALA/light treatment typically exhibited a more aggressive phenotype, proliferating and migrating/invading more rapidly than controls in iNOS/NO-dependent fashion. Most of these in vitro PDT findings have recently been confirmed at the in vivo level, using a human breast tumor xenograft model. We have also shown that upregulated iNOS in PDT-targeted cells can elicit a pro-growth/migration response in non-targeted bystander cells, NO again playing a key role. Post-PDT resistance and potentially dangerous hyper-aggressiveness can be attenuated by inhibitors of iNOS enzymatic activity, some of which have seen pharmacologic use in non-cancer or PDT settings. These various aspects of PDT antagonism by tumor iNOS/NO and how they might be overcome will be discussed in this review. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:590-598, 2018.© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Nanomedicine associated with photodynamic therapy for glioblastoma treatment

Glioblastoma, also known as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is the most recurrent and malignant astrocytic glioma found in adults. Biologically, GBMs are highly aggressive tumors that often show diffuse infiltration of the brain parenchyma, making complete surgical resection difficult. GBM is not curable with surgery alone because tumor cells typically invade the surrounding brain, rendering complete resection unsafe. Consequently, present-day therapy for malignant glioma remains a great challenge. The location of the invasive tumor cells presents several barriers to therapeutic delivery. The blood-brain barrier regulates the trafficking of molecules to and from the brain. While high-grade brain tumors contain some "leakiness" in their neovasculature, the mechanisms of GBM onset and progression remain largely unknown. Recent advances in the understanding of the signaling pathways that underlie GBM pathogenesis have led to the development of new therapeutic approaches targeting multiple oncogenic signaling aberrations associated with the GBM. Among these, drug delivery nanosystems have been produced to target therapeutic agents and improve their biodistribution and therapeutic index in the tumor. These systems mainly include polymer or lipid-based carriers such as liposomes, metal nanoparticles, polymeric nanospheres and nanocapsules, micelles, dendrimers, nanocrystals, and nanogold. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment for a variety of oncological diseases. PDT is an efficient, simple, and versatile method that is based on a combination of a photosensitive drug and light (generally laser-diode or laser); these factors are separately relatively harmless but when used together in the presence of oxygen molecules, free radicals are produced that initiate a sequence of biological events, including phototoxicity, vascular damage, and immune responses. Photodynamic pathways activate a cascade of activities, including apoptotic and necrotic cell death in both the tumor and the neovasculature, leading to a permanent lesion and destruction of GBM cells that remain in the healthy tissue. Glioblastoma tumors differ at the molecular level. For example, gene amplification epidermal growth factor receptor and its receptor are more highly expressed in primary GBM than in secondary GBM. Despite these distinguishing features, both types of tumors (primary and secondary) arise as a result dysregulation of numerous intracellular signaling pathways and have standard features, such as increased cell proliferation, survival and resistance to apoptosis, and loss of adhesion and migration, and may show a high degree of invasiveness. PDT may promote significant tumor regression and extend the lifetime of patients who experience glioma progression.

Photostimulation of mitochondria as a treatment for retinal neurodegeneration

Absorption of photon energy by neuronal mitochondria leads to numerous downstream neuroprotective effects. Red and near infrared (NIR) light are associated with significantly less safety concerns than light of shorter wavelengths and they are therefore, the optimal choice for irradiating the retina. Potent neuroprotective effects have been demonstrated in various models of retinal damage, by red/NIR light, with limited data from human studies showing its ability to improve visual function. Improved neuronal mitochondrial function, increased blood flow to neural tissue, upregulation of cell survival mediators and restoration of normal microglial function have all been proposed as potential underlying mechanisms of red/NIR light.

Nitric oxide-mediated resistance to photodynamic therapy in a human breast tumor xenograft model: Improved outcome with NOS2 inhibitors

Many malignant tumors employ iNOS-derived NO to resist eradication by chemotherapeutic agents or ionizing radiation. In this study, we determined whether human breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro and in vivo as tumor xenografts would exploit endogenous iNOS/NO to resist the cytotoxic effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic therapy (PDT). Broad band visible irradiation of ALA-treated cells resulted in a marked after-light upregulation of iNOS protein which persisted for at least 24 h. Apoptotic killing of ALA/light-challenged cells was significantly enhanced by iNOS inhibitors (1400W, GW274150) and a NO trap (cPTIO), implying that stress-induced iNOS/NO was acting cytoprotectively. We found that cells surviving the photostress proliferated and migrated more rapidly than controls in 1400W- and cPTIO-inhibitable fashion, indicating iNOS/NO involvement. Female SCID mice bearing MDA-MB-231 tumors were used for animal model experiments. ALA-PDT with a 633 nm light source caused a significant reduction in post-irradiation tumor growth relative to light-only controls, which was further reduced by administration of 1400W or GW274150, whereas 1400W had little or no effect on controls. Immunoblot analyses of tumor samples revealed a progressive post-PDT upregulation of iNOS, which reached >5-times the control level after six days. Correspondingly, the nitrite/nitrate level in post-PDT tumor samples was substantially higher than that in controls. In addition, a 1400W-inhibitable upregulation of pro-survival/progression effector proteins such as Bcl-xL, Survivin, and S100A4 was observed after in vitro and in vivo ALA-PDT. This is the first known study to demonstrate iNOS/NO-induced resistance to PDT in an in vivo human tumor model.

Modulation of the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy by Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzymes is a free radical molecule involved in a wide variety of normophysiologic and pathophysiologic processes. Included in the latter category are cancer promotion, progression, and resistance to therapeutic intervention. Animal tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies several years ago revealed that endogenous NO can reduce PDT efficacy and that NOS inhibitors can alleviate this. Until relatively recently, little else was known about this anti-PDT effect of NO, including: (a) the underlying mechanisms; (b) type(s) of NOS involved; and (c) whether active NO was generated in vascular cells, tumor cells, or both. In addressing these questions for various cancer cell lines exposed to PDT-like conditions, the author's group has made several novel findings, including: (i) exogenous NO can scavenge lipid-derived free radicals arising from photostress, thereby protecting cells from membrane-damaging chain peroxidation; (ii) cancer cells can upregulate inducible NOS (iNOS) after a PDT-like challenge and the resulting NO can signal for resistance to photokilling; (iii) photostress-surviving cells with elevated iNOS/NO proliferate and migrate/invade more aggressively; and (iv) NO produced by photostress-targeted cells can induce greater aggressiveness in non-targeted bystander cells. In this article, the author briefly discusses these various means by which NO can interfere with PDT and how this may be mitigated by use of NOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants.

Role of Endogenous Nitric Oxide in Hyperaggressiveness of Tumor Cells that Survive a Photodynamic Therapy Challenge

Many malignant tumors exploit nitric oxide (NO) for a survival, growth, and migration/invasion advantage, and also to withstand the cytotoxic effects of chemo- and radiotherapies. Endogenous NO has also been shown to antagonize photodynamic therapy (PDT), a unique minimally invasive modality involving a photosensitizing (PS) agent, PS-exciting light in the visible- to near-infrared range, and molecular oxygen. The anti-PDT effects of NO were discovered about 20 years ago, but the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. More recent studies in the author's laboratory using breast, prostate, and brain cancer cell lines have shown that inducible NO synthase (iNOS/NOS2) is dramatically upregulated after a PDT challenge using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA-) -induced protoporphyrin IX as the PS. The parallel increase in NO resulted not only in a greater resistance to cell killing but also in a striking increase in the growth and migration/invasion rate of surviving cells. These in vitro findings and their recent recapitulation at the in vivo level are discussed in this article, along with how iNOS/NO's negative effects on PDT can be attenuated by the use of select iNOS inhibitors as PDT adjuvants.

Cholesterol as a natural probe for free radical-mediated lipid peroxidation in biological membranes and lipoproteins

We describe a relatively convenient and reliable procedure for assessing the magnitude of free radical-mediated (chain) lipid peroxidation in biological systems. The approach is based on use of radiolabeled cholesterol ([(14)C]Ch) as a probe and determination of well-resolved oxidation intermediates/products ([(14)C]ChOX species), using high performance thin layer chromatography with phorphorimaging detection (HPTLC-PI). In a lipid hydroperoxide-primed liposomal test system treated with ascorbate and a lipophilic iron chelate, the following well-resolved [(14)C]ChOX are detected and quantified: 7α/7β-OOH, 7α/7β-OH, and 5,6-epoxide, their levels increasing with incubation time at 37°C. [(14)C]Ch also serves as an excellent probe for lipid peroxidation in lipoproteins and plasma membranes of mammalian cells. Because this approach utilizes Ch as a natural in situ probe, it eliminates potential artifacts associated with artificial probes such as spin traps and fluorophores.

Subacute zinc administration and L-NAME caused an increase of NO, zinc, lipoperoxidation, and caspase-3 during a cerebral hypoxia-ischemia process in the rat

Zinc or L-NAME administration has been shown to be protector agents, decreasing oxidative stress and cell death. However, the treatment with zinc and L-NAME by intraperitoneal injection has not been studied. The aim of our work was to study the effect of zinc and L-NAME administration on nitrosative stress and cell death. Male Wistar rats were treated with ZnCl₂ (2.5 mg/kg each 24 h, for 4 days) and N-ω-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME, 10 mg/kg) on the day 5 (1 hour before a common carotid-artery occlusion (CCAO)). The temporoparietal cortex and hippocampus were dissected, and zinc, nitrites, and lipoperoxidation were assayed at different times. Cell death was assayed by histopathology using hematoxylin-eosin staining and caspase-3 active by immunostaining. The subacute administration of zinc before CCAO decreases the levels of zinc, nitrites, lipoperoxidation, and cell death in the late phase of the ischemia. L-NAME administration in the rats treated with zinc showed an increase of zinc levels in the early phase and increase of zinc, nitrites, and lipoperoxidation levels, cell death by necrosis, and the apoptosis in the late phase. These results suggest that the use of these two therapeutic strategies increased the injury caused by the CCAO, unlike the alone administration of zinc.

Role of nitric oxide in pathological responses of the lung to exposure to environmental/occupational agents

Conflicting evidence exists as to whether nitric oxide expresses damaging/inflammatory or antioxidant/anti-inflammatory properties. Data presented in this review indicate that in vitro or in vivo exposure to selected environmental or occupational agents, such as asbestos, silica, ozone or lipopolysaccharide, can result in up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase by alveolar macrophages and pulmonary epithelial cells. In the case of silica exposure, evidence consistently supports a damaging/inflammatory role of nitric oxide and/or peroxynitrite in the pathogenesis of lung disease. Although conflicting data have been reported, the majority of published studies suggest that nitric oxide plays a damaging role in pulmonary injury resulting from exposure to ozone or asbestos. In contrast, most information supports an anti-inflammatory role of nitric oxide following exposure to lipopolysaccharide. Further investigation is required to elucidate fully the mechanisms involved in determining the role of nitric oxide in the initiation and progression of various pulmonary diseases.

Nitric oxide-induced resistance to lethal photooxidative damage in a breast tumor cell line

The long-term effects of nitric oxide (NO) on cell susceptibility to photodynamic killing have been studied, using a human breast tumor line (COH-BR1). Subconfluent cells were exposed to a nonlethal dose of spermine NONOate (SPNO, 0.2 mM) and 20 h later were metabolically sensitized with protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) by incubating with 5-aminolevulinic acid. PpIX overproduced in mitochondria was allowed to diffuse to peripheral sites, including plasma membrane, after which a photooxidative challenge was imposed. Active (but not decomposed) SPNO made cells substantially more resistant to necrotic photokilling than non-SPNO-treated controls. A similar response to a tert-butyl hydroperoxide challenge was observed. Hyperresistance was detected approximately 8 h post-SPNO, maximized after approximately 20 h, and reflected diminished oxidant accumulation, as determined with 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein. Intracellular free iron determined with the fluorescent probe calcein rose to approximately 160% of the control level 6 h after SPNO, but declined to approximately 70% after 24 h. Immunoblot analyses revealed a rapid early (approximately 2 h post-NO) increase in heme oxygenase-1 level, followed by a gradual (4-20 h post-NO) increase in ferritin. Upregulation of these proteins is consistent with a cytoprotective mechanism involving mobilization of "signaling" iron. Preactivated RAW 264.7 macrophages on microporous inserts also induced a long-term photoresistance in underlying PpIX-sensitized COH-BR1 cells. This response was abolished by L-NAME, indicating that NO from induced nitric oxide synthase was involved. The NO effects described are entirely novel in the context of photooxidative stress and provide new insights into how NO might affect antitumor photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Sensitivity to ALA-PDT of cell lines with different nitric oxide production and resistance to NO cytotoxicity

In this work, we studied the in vitro interactions between aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) and nitric oxide (NO), as well as the interactions between ALA, porphyrins and some NO donors and precursors. We employed three murine adenocarcinoma cell lines: LM2, which does not produce NO; LM3, which produces NO, and LM3-SNP, a variant of LM3 resistant to NO producing the same amount of NO as the parental. We did not find cross-resistance between NO-induced cytotoxicity and ALA-PDT. In spite of the lower porphyrin synthesis, LM2 cells show the highest sensitivity to ALA-PDT. However, we hypothesised that this is not related to the lack of endogenous NO production, because modulation of NO levels did not modify the response to PDT in any of the cell lines. Two unexpected results were found: the enhancement of NO production from the donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) induced by ALA in both cells and medium, and the inhibition by ALA of NO production from arginine. We also found that SNP strongly protected the cells from ALA-PDT by impairing porphyrin biosynthesis as a consequence of an inhibition of the enzyme ALA dehydratase. We were not able to evaluate the action of NO derived from SNP because of the unexpected porphyrin impairment. On the other hand, impairment of NO from Arginine driven by ALA, although not modulating in vitro the ALA-PDT response, by increasing in vivo blood flow, may be contributing to the mechanism of tumour cures.

No cross-resistance between ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy and nitric oxide

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) interactions with nitric oxide (NO) are not well understood. In this work, we attempted to elucidate whether NO cytotoxicity and PDT from aminolevulinic acid (ALA) have independent cell damage mechanisms. We employed the murine mammary adenocarcinoma cell line LM3 and its NO-resistant variant LM3-SNP obtained after successive exposures to sodium nitroprusside (SNP). No cross-resistance was found between NO cytotoxicity and ALA-PDT; LM3-SNP cells were not more resistant to ALA-PDT than the parental line, instead they were more sensitive. We also induced resistance to ALA-PDT in LM3-SNP cells after multiple cycles of photodynamic treatment. We isolated two clones, identified as Clon 1 and Clon 3, which were 9.2 and 12.5 times more resistant to ALA-PDT than the parental lines, showing that resistance to NO did not interfere in the development of PDT resistance. In addition, the sensitivity to NO decreased in Clon 1 and increased in Clon 3, but they did not show any modifications in NO production. All the cell lines have similar GSH content and GSH transferases activities. However, GSSG content is markedly lower in LM3-SNP, Clon 1, and Clon 3 compared to parental LM3 line and consequently GSH/GSSG ratios are also higher. Our results suggest that different degrees of NO resistance of tumours would not correlate with resistance to PDT.

Merocyanine 540-sensitized photokilling of leukemia cells: role of post-irradiation chain peroxidation of plasma membrane lipids as revealed by nitric oxide protection

The lipophilic dye merocyanine 540 (MC540) localizes primarily in the plasma membrane (PM) of tumor cells, where it can sensitize lethal photoperoxidative damage of potential therapeutic importance. We postulated (i) that chain peroxidation triggered by iron-catalyzed turnover of nascent hydroperoxides (LOOHs) generated by singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) attack on PM lipids contributes significantly to overall cytolethality, and (ii) that nitric oxide (NO), a known scavenger of organic free radicals, would suppress this and, thus, act cytoprotectively. In accordance, irradiation of MC540-sensitized L1210 cells produced 5alpha-OOH, a definitive (1)O(2) adduct of PM cholesterol, which decayed during subsequent dark incubation with appearance of other signature peroxides, viz. free-radical-derived 7alpha/beta-OOH. Whereas chemical donor (SPNO or SNAP)-derived NO had little or no effect on post-irradiation 5alpha-OOH disappearance, it dose-dependently inhibited 7alpha/beta-OOH accumulation, consistent with interception of chain-carrying radicals arising from one-electron reduction of primary LOOHs. Using [(14)C]cholesterol as an L1210 PM probe, we detected additional after-light products of chain peroxidation, including diols (7alpha-OH, 7beta-OH) and 5,6-epoxides, the yields of which were enhanced by iron supplementation, but strongly suppressed by NO. Correspondingly, photoinitiated cell killing was significantly inhibited by NO introduced either immediately before or after light exposure. These findings indicate that prooxidant LOOH turnover plays an important role in photokilling and that NO, by intercepting propagating radicals, can significantly enhance cellular resistance.

Role of mitochondrial cardiolipin peroxidation in apoptotic photokilling of 5-aminolevulinate-treated tumor cells

In 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based photodynamic therapy (PDT), ALA taken up by tumor cells is metabolized to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), which sensitizes photodamage leading to apoptotic or necrotic cell death. Since lipophilic PpIX originates in mitochondria, we postulated that photoperoxidation of highly unsaturated cardiolipin (CL), which anchors cytochrome c (cyt c) to the inner membrane, is an early proapoptotic event. As initial evidence, PpIX-sensitized photooxidation of liposomal CL to hydroperoxide (CLOOH) species precluded cyt c binding, but this could be reinstated by GSH/selenoperoxidase (GPX4) treatment. Further support derived from site-specific effects observed using (i) a mitochondrial GPX4-overexpressing clone (7G4) of COH-BR1 tumor cells, and (ii) an ALA treatment protocol in which most cellular PpIX is either inside (Pr-1) or outside (Pr-2) mitochondria. Sensitized cells were exposed to a lethal light dose, and then analyzed for death mechanism and lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH) levels. Irradiated Pr-1 vector control (VC) cells died apoptotically following cyt c release and caspase-3 activation, whereas 7G4 cells were highly resistant. Irradiated Pr-2 VC and 7G4 cells showed negligible cyt c release or caspase-3 activation, and both types died via necrosis. CLOOH (detected long before cyt c release) accumulated approximately 70% slower in Pr-1 7G4 cells than in Pr-1 VC, and this slowdown exceeded that of all other LOOHs. These and related findings support the hypothesis that CL is a key upstream target in mitochondria-dependent ALA-PDT-induced apoptosis.

Oxidants, antioxidants and the ischemic brain

Despite numerous defenses, the brain is vulnerable to oxidative stress resulting from ischemia/reperfusion. Excitotoxic stimulation of superoxide and nitric oxide production leads to formation of highly reactive products, including peroxynitrite and hydroxyl radical, which are capable of damaging lipids, proteins and DNA. Use of transgenic mutants and selective pharmacological antioxidants has greatly increased understanding of the complex interplay between substrate deprivation and ischemic outcome. Recent evidence that reactive oxygen/nitrogen species play a critical role in initiation of apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation provides additional mechanisms for oxidative damage and new targets for post-ischemic therapeutic intervention. Because oxidative stress involves multiple post-ischemic cascades leading to cell death, effective prevention/treatment of ischemic brain injury is likely to require intervention at multiple effect sites.

Intracellular signaling mechanisms in photodynamic therapy

In photodynamic therapy (PDT) a sensitizer, light and oxygen are used to induce death of tumor cells and in the treatment of certain noncancerous conditions. Cell death in PDT may occur by apoptosis or by necrosis, depending on the sensitizer, on the PDT dose and on the cell genotype. Some sensitizers that have been used in PDT are accumulated in the mitochondria, and this may explain their efficiency in inducing apoptotic cell death, both in vitro and in vivo. In this review we will focus on the events that characterize apoptotic death in PDT and on the intracellular signaling events that are set in motion in photosensitized cells. Activation of phospholipases, changes in ceramide metabolism, a rise in the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration, stimulation of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), changes in protein phosphorylation and alterations in the activity of transcription factors and on gene expression have all been observed in PDT-treated cells. Although many of these metabolic reactions contribute to the demise process, some of them may antagonize cell death. Understanding the signaling mechanisms in PDT may provide means to modulate the PDT effects at the molecular level and potentiate its antitumor effectiveness.

Role of lipid hydroperoxides in photo-oxidative stress signaling

Photosensitized peroxidation of membrane lipids has been implicated in skin pathologies such as phototoxicity, premature aging, and carcinogenesis, and may play a role in the antitumor effects of photodynamic therapy. Lipid hydroperoxides (LOOHs) are prominent early products of photoperoxidation that typically arise via singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) attack. Nascent LOOHs can have several possible fates, including (i) iron-catalyzed one-electron reduction to chain-initiating free radicals, which exacerbate peroxidative damage, (ii) selenoperoxidase-catalyzed two-electron reduction to relatively innocuous alcohols, and (iii) translocation to other membranes, where reactions noted in (i) or (ii) might take place. In addition, LOOHs, like other stress-associated lipid metabolites/peroxidation products (e.g., arachidonate, diacylglycerol, ceramide, 4-hydroxynonenal), may act as signaling molecules. Intermembrane transfer of LOOHs may greatly expand their signaling range. When photogenerated rapidly and site-specifically, e.g., in mitochondria, LOOHs may act as early mediators of apoptotic cell death. This review will focus on these various aspects, with special attention to the role of LOOHs in photooxidative signaling.