Temporal variability of vena contracta and jet areas with color Doppler in aortic regurgitation: a chronic animal model study

[Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using tridimensional transoesophageal echocardiography for aortic regurgitation, reproducibility and feasibility]

BACKGROUND

Aortic regurgitation is mainly evaluated by trans-thoracic echocardiography using multi-parametric qualitative and semi quantitative tools. All those parameters can fail to meet expectations, resulting in an imperfect diagnostic reliability and assessment of aortic regurgitation severity can be challenging.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate feasibility and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of aortic regurgitant orifice area measured by planimetry with tridimensional trans-esophageal echocardiography on patients with at least grade 2/4 aortic regurgitation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with at least grade 2/4 aortic regurgitation measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography and referred for trans-esophageal echocardiography for any reason were included. Planimetric reconstructions of regurgitant orifice area were studied and reproducibility indexes between senior and junior observers were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included in this study. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were excellent with an ICC of 0.95 [0.88-0.98], P<0.0001 and 0.91 [0.79-0.96], P<0.0001, respectively. Mean length of the measurement was 6.6±0.9min [CI95% 6.23-7.01].

CONCLUSION

Planimetric measurement of the aortic regurgitant orifice using tridimensional trans-esophageal echocardiography seems to be feasible and has great intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Reconstruction durations were compatible with a daily use. There is a need now to investigate the reliability of this measurement as compared with the reference technique.

Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging

This review is about the development of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonic medical imaging, how it works, and where its future lies. It assumes knowledge of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound, which is covered elsewhere in this issue. The three main ways in which 3D ultrasound may be acquired are described: the mechanically swept 3D probe, the 2D transducer array that can acquire intrinsically 3D data, and the freehand 3D ultrasound. This provides an appreciation of the constraints implicit in each of these approaches together with their strengths and weaknesses. Then some of the techniques that are used for processing the 3D data and the way this can lead to information of clinical value are discussed. A table is provided to show the range of clinical applications reported in the literature. Finally, the discussion relating to the technology and its clinical applications to explain why 3D ultrasound has been relatively slow to be adopted in routine clinics is drawn together and the issues that will govern its development in the future explored.

Direct measurement of vena contracta area by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessing severity of mitral regurgitation

We tested the hypothesis that the vena contracta (VC) cross-sectional area in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) can be reproducibly measured by real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography and correlates well with the volumetric effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA). Earlier MR repair requires accurate noninvasive measures, but practically, the VC area is difficult to image in 2-dimensional views, which are often oblique to it. 3D echocardiography can provide an otherwise unobtainable true cross-sectional view. In 45 patients with mild or greater MR, 44% eccentric, 2-dimensional and 3D VC areas were measured and correlated with the EROA derived from the regurgitant stroke volume. Real-time 3D echocardiography of the VC area correlated and agreed well with the EROA for both central and eccentric jets (r(2) = 0.86, SEE 0.02 cm(2), difference 0.04 +/- 0.06 cm(2), p = NS). For eccentric jets, 2-dimensional echocardiography overestimated the VC width compared with 3D echocardiography (p = 0.024) and correlated more poorly with the EROA (r(2) = 0.61 vs 0.85, p <0.001), causing clinical misclassification in 45% of patients with eccentric MR. The interobserver variability for the 3D VC area was 0.03 cm(2) (7.5% of the mean, r = 0.95); the intraobserver variability was 0.01 cm(2) (2.5% of the mean, r = 0.97). In conclusion, real-time 3D echocardiography accurately and reproducibly quantified the vena contracta cross-sectional area in patients with both central and eccentric MR. Rapid acquisition and intuitive analysis promote practical clinical application of this central, directly visualized, measure and its correlation with outcome.

New index for grading the severity of aortic regurgitation based on the cross-sectional area of vena contracta measured by color Doppler flow mapping

This study was designed to examine whether the cross-sectional area of vena contracta measured by color Doppler flow mapping (CFM) could be used for assessing aortic regurgitation (AR) and developing an index for grading AR. The 75 study patients with AR were classified into quadrant grades according to New York Heart Association functional class, regurgitant fraction, left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic dimension and LV end-systolic dimension. Using CFM, the cross-sectional area of the vena contracta was measured and it could distinguish all grades without significant overlap. An area of less than 0.10 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 1, 0.10-0.19 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 2, 0.20-0.29 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 3 and an area of more than 0.30 cm(2) corresponded to Grade 4. An area of vena contracta of more than 0.30 cm(2) identified high-scoring AR (Grade 4) in 11 of 11 (sensitivity 100%) and correctly predicted the absence of high-scoring AR in 60 of 64 (specificity 94%). Conversely, there was considerable overlap between the jet distances with the clinical grades. The cross-sectional area of the vena contracta measured by CFM can provide a simple quantitative assessment of AR that correlates well with the clinical grade of AR.

Quantitative assessment of severity of ventricular septal defect by three-dimensional reconstruction of color Doppler-imaged vena contracta and flow convergence region

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and potential value of the computer-controlled, 3D, echocardiographic reconstruction of the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta (CDVC) and the flow convergence (FC) region as a means of accurately and quantitatively estimating the severity of a ventricular septal defect (VSD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a 3D reconstruction of the CDVC and the FC region in 19 patients with an isolated VSD using an ultrasound system interfaced with a Tomtec computer. The variable asymmetric geometry of the CDVC and the FC region could be 3D-visualized in all patients. The 3D-measured areas of CDVC correlated well with volumetric measurements of the severity of VSD (r=0.97, P:<0.001). Regression analysis between the shunt flow rate (calculated from the product of the area of CDVC and the continuous Doppler-derived velocity time integral) and the corresponding reference results (calculated by cardiac catheterization) demonstrated a close correlation (r=0.95, P:<0.001). There was also a good correlation between shunt flow rates calculated using the conventional 2D, 1-axis measurement of the FC isovelocity surface area with the hemispheric assumption (r=0.95, P:<0.001); shunt flow rates calculated using 3D, 3-axis measurements of the FC region (r=0.97, P:<0.01); and reference results by cardiac catheterization. However, the 2D method substantially underestimated the actual shunt flow rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D reconstruction of the CDVC and the FC region may aid in quantifying the severity of VSD.

Evaluation of effective aortic regurgitant orifice area and its effect on aortic regurgitant volume with Doppler echocardiography

The authors measured the aortic regurgitant orifice area (ROA) using Doppler echocardiography and attempted to clarify how important the ROA is in determining the regurgitant volume (RV) in 22 patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). The RV was calculated from the difference between the left ventricular ejection flow volume and transmitral inflow volume as measured by Doppler echocardiography. The ROA was obtained by two methods: RV/time velocity integral of AR jet measured by continuous wave Doppler (calculation method) and manual tracing of minimum cross-sectional area of short-axis color Doppler. The RV ranged from 10 to 90 mL/beat and the ROA by calculation method was from 0.05 to 0.35 cm2, which showed a strong correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.001). The time velocity integral of aortic regurgitant jet showed a poor correlation with the RV (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). The values of ROA by the two methods showed a good correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.001). Thus, the authors conclude that the ROA is a basic determinant of the RV in AR and that color Doppler can be employed to precisely assess the ROA.