Intensive monitoring program for oral food intake in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a cost-benefit analysis

Systematic Nutritional Support in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become an established treatment modality for various hematological diseases. However, in allogeneic HSCT, patients often suffer from severe gastrointestinal complications caused by the conditioning regimen and acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease, which requires support by multidisciplinary nutritional support teams (NST). In addition, pretransplantation nutritional status can affect the clinical outcome after allogeneic HSCT. Therefore, it is important to refer the patient to a NST when becoming aware of nutritional problems before allogeneic HSCT. It is also important to follow nutritional status over the long term, as patients often suffer from various nutritional problems, such as malnutrition and metabolic syndrome, even late after allogeneic HSCT. In summary, NST can contribute to the improvement of nutritional status and possibly prognosis at every stage before and after allogeneic HSCT. Here, we aim to give a comprehensive overview of current understanding about nutritional support in allogeneic HSCT and try to provoke a constructive discussion to stimulate further investigation.

Prognostic factors in the resumption of oral dietary intake after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a common supportive care therapy in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Inadequate oral dietary intake may necessitate prolonged courses of PN, which have been associated with metabolic, infectious, and hepatobiliary complications. The objective of this study was to identify demographic, clinical, and nutrition factors associated with the resumption of oral dietary intake following HSCT.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of 37 children undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Repeated-measures regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the resumption and macronutrient composition of oral nutrient intake after HSCT.

RESULTS

Mean oral dietary intake during the first 2 weeks after HSCT was <280 kcal/d. At all times, oral carbohydrate intake was high, ranging from 58% to 74% of oral energy. Age, time since transplant, degree of oral mucositis, and severity of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) were all significantly correlated with the resumption of oral energy intake, as well as oral intake of carbohydrates. Oral protein and fat intake were also associated with elapsed time since HSCT, severity of mucositis, and GVHD. Factors not associated with oral dietary intake included gender, pre-HSCT nutrition status, diagnosis, type of donor, and infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Children undergoing HSCT exhibit a marked reduction in oral dietary intake and a preference for a diet high in carbohydrates. Careful attention should be directed to the oral dietary intake and nutrient requirements of children during HSCT, especially in younger patients and those who experience severe mucositis or GVHD.

Exploring the Clinical Characteristics of Parenteral Nutrition Recipients Admitted for Initial Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

There is a paucity of evidence to guide the initiation of parenteral nutrition administration during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare clinical characteristics during early hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to discern if differences existed between those that had parenteral nutrition initiated and those that did not. Medical records of patients admitted for initial autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from two university transplantation centers were evaluated for this retrospective cohort. A multitude of clinical features were evaluated at baseline and in the days preceding parenteral nutrition initiation to investigate potential differences between parenteral nutrition and non-parenteral nutrition subjects, stratified by donor type. To examine the occurrence of events prior to parenteral nutrition administration, a "before" time frame was created for all subjects. For parenteral nutrition subjects, the actual number of hospital days prior to parenteral nutrition initiation was used; however, for non-parenteral nutrition patients, the transplantation-specific average number of days until parenteral nutrition initiation, depicted as "before" (ie, autologous non-parenteral nutrition "before"=hospital days 1 to 10, allogeneic non-parenteral nutrition "before"=hospital days 1 to 13), was used during this parallel timeframe. Differences were assessed using Student's t and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables, and chi(2) for categorical variables. Parenteral nutrition was provided to 53% (n=129/245) of autologous and 65% (n=73/112) of allogeneic patients and was typically initiated on transplant day +6 and day +7, respectively. Significant decreases in oral intake patterns (P<0.0001) and a tendency toward infections were observed for autologous (P=0.01) and allogeneic (P=0.07) parenteral nutrition vs non-parenteral nutrition recipients "before." In addition, significantly more mucositis was observed "before" in allogeneic parenteral nutrition vs non-parenteral nutrition patients (P=0.04). Involvement of nutrition professionals is crucial for the design and implementation of future studies to determine for whom and when to commence parenteral nutrition and to discourage its indiscriminant use.