Preoperative radiochemotherapy and radical surgery in comparison with radical surgery alone. A prospective, multicentric, randomized DOSAK study of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and the oropharynx (a 3-year follow-up)

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an important part of the management of oral cavity cancer with regard to both the removal of the primary tumour and removal of lymph nodes in the neck. Surgery is less frequently used in oropharyngeal cancer. Surgery alone may be treatment for early-stage disease or surgery may be used in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy/biotherapy. There is variation in the recommended timing and extent of surgery in the overall treatment regimens of people with these cancers. This is an update of a review originally published in 2007 and first updated in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which surgical treatment modalities for oral and oropharyngeal cancers result in increased overall survival, disease-free survival and locoregional control and reduced recurrence. To determine the implication of treatment modalities in terms of morbidity, quality of life, costs, hospital days of treatment, complications and harms.

SEARCH METHODS

Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (to 20 December 2017), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 11), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 20 December 2017) and Embase Ovid (1980 to 20 December 2017). We searched the US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. There were no restrictions on the language or date of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx, or where separate data could be extracted for these participants, and that compared two or more surgical treatment modalities, or surgery versus other treatment modalities.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two or more review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We contacted study authors for additional information as required. We collected adverse events data from included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five new trials in this update, bringing the total number of included trials to 12 (2300 participants; 2148 with cancers of the oral cavity). We assessed four trials at high risk of bias, and eight at unclear. None of the included trials compared different surgical approaches for the excision of the primary tumour. We grouped the trials into seven main comparisons.Future research may change the findings as there is only very low-certainty evidence available for all results.Five trials compared elective neck dissection (ND) with therapeutic (delayed) ND in participants with oral cavity cancer and clinically negative neck nodes, but differences in type of surgery and duration of follow-up made meta-analysis inappropriate in most cases. Four of these trials reported overall and disease-free survival. The meta-analyses of two trials found no evidence of either intervention leading to greater overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41 to 1.72; 571 participants), or disease-free survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.11; 571 participants), but one trial found a benefit for elective supraomohyoid ND compared to therapeutic ND in overall survival (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.84; 67 participants) and disease-free survival (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.84; 67 participants). Four individual trials assessed locoregional recurrence, but could not be meta-analysed; one trial favoured elective ND over therapeutic delayed ND, while the others were inconclusive.Two trials compared elective radical ND with elective selective ND, but we were unable to pool the data for two outcomes. Neither study found evidence of a difference in overall survival or disease-free survival. A single trial found no evidence of a difference in recurrence.One trial compared surgery plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone, but data were unreliable because the trial stopped early and there were multiple protocol violations.One trial comparing positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) following chemoradiotherapy (with ND only if no or incomplete response) versus planned ND (either before or after chemoradiotherapy), showed no evidence of a difference in mortality (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.31; 564 participants). The trial did not provide usable data for the other outcomes.Three single trials compared: surgery plus adjunctive radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy; supraomohyoid ND versus modified radical ND; and super selective ND versus selective ND. There were no useable data from these trials.The reporting of adverse events was poor. Four trials measured adverse events. Only one of the trials reported quality of life as an outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Twelve randomised controlled trials evaluated ND surgery in people with oral cavity cancers; however, the evidence available for all comparisons and outcomes is very low certainty, therefore we cannot rely on the findings. The evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about elective ND of clinically negative neck nodes at the time of removal of the primary tumour compared to therapeutic (delayed) ND. Two trials combined in meta-analysis suggested there is no difference between these interventions, while one trial (which evaluated elective supraomohyoid ND) found that it may be associated with increased overall and disease-free survival. One trial found elective ND reduced locoregional recurrence, while three were inconclusive. There is no evidence that radical ND increases overall or disease-free survival compared to more conservative ND surgery, or that there is a difference in mortality between PET-CT surveillance following chemoradiotherapy versus planned ND (before or after chemoradiotherapy). Reporting of adverse events in all trials was poor and it was not possible to compare the quality of life of people undergoing different surgical treatments.

Validity of Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Detection following Adjuvant Radiochemotherapy (RCT) in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

The effect of preoperative radio chemotherapy on lymphatic drainage and intraoperative gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node detection has yet not been investigated. In this study, we study 13 patients with SCC. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) imaging of the patients was performed using SPECT-CT. Special care was taken to use identical injection sites for both studies. Imaging comprised planar and SPECT, iterative reconstruction and were viewed with the co-registered CT image. The results were validated by comparison with the histological results of intraoperative gamma probe detection and histology of the completed neck dissection. Identical SLNs were found in 6/13 patients. In 2/13 cases SLN biopsies were false-negative. In 4/13 patients preoperative SLN imaging identified more/additional nodes than the initial imaging, whereas fewer nodes were seen in 3/13 patients. Neither the primary tumor site nor the TNM stage was predictive for changes in the lymphatic drainage pattern. No constant effect of irradiation could be demonstrated. Preoperative radio chemotherapy has an unpredictable influence on the lymphatic drainage pattern in HNSCC. Consequently, the intraoperative gamma probe-guided sentinel lymph node detection after radio chemotherapy does not reveal the SLN of carcinogenesis. Thus, we advise fused functional/anatomical imaging (SPECT-CT) before and after radiochemotherapy if the SLN concept is utilized in HNSCC.

Clinicopathological evaluation of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 as a treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

The administration of pre-operative chemotherapy with S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy at a total dose of 30 Gy was clinicopathologically evaluated as a treatment for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the present study. The participants comprised 81 patients with OSCC, consisting of 29 patients with stage II disease, 12 patients with stage III disease and 40 patients with stage IV disease. All patients received a total radiation dose of 30 Gy in daily fractions of 2 Gy, 5 times a week, for 3 weeks, and the patients were concurrently administered S-1 at a dose of 80-120 mg, twice daily, over 4 consecutive weeks. Radical surgery was performed in all cases at 2-6 weeks subsequent to the end of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy. The most common adverse event was oropharyngeal mucositis, but this was transient in all patients. No severe hematological or non-hematological toxicities were observed. The clinical and histopathological response rates were 70.4 and 75.3%, respectively. Post-operatively, local failure developed in 6 patients (7.4%) and neck failure developed in 2 patients (2.5%). Distant metastases were found in 7 patients (8.6%). The overall survival rate, disease-specific survival rate and locoregional control rate at 5 years were 87.7, 89.9 and 90.6%, respectively. Locoregional recurrence occurred more frequently in patients that demonstrated a poor histopathological response compared with patients that demonstrated a good response (P<0.01). These results indicate that pre-operative S-1 chemotherapy with radiotherapy at a total dose of 30 Gy is feasible and effective for patients with locally advanced OSCC, and that little or no histopathological response may be a risk factor for locoregional recurrence in this treatment.

Increased expression of interleukin-6 predicts poor response to chemoradiotherapy and unfavorable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Recent studies have revealed that cancer cells are exacerbated by chronic inflammation. The present study examined the immunohistochemical expression for interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pleiotropic inflammatory cytokine, in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) to elucidate the association of IL-6 expression with tumor progression, chemoresistance and prognosis. Seventy-eight patients with primary OSCC were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining for IL-6. These labeling indexes (LIs) were calculated and evaluated in association with the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in the OSCC patients. The patients were divided into three groups as follows: negative group = LI <5%; low IL-6 group = 5% ≤ LI <30%; high IL-6 group = LI ≥30%. The patient numbers of the negative, low and high expression groups were 24, 22 and 32, respectively. In the high IL-6 expression group, IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), phosphor-signal tranducer and activator of transcription 3 (p-STAT3) were also detected in almost all the cancer cells. The prevalence of the cervical lymph node or the distant metastasis in the high expression group was significantly higher than those in the negative and low expression groups. Furthermore, the high expression group had a significantly poorer tumor response to the preoperative chemoradiotherapy and a more unfavourable prognosis than the negative and the low expression groups. Interestingly, IL-6, IL-6R and p-STAT3 were expressed in the residual cancer cells of all the patients in the high expression group with poor response to chemoradiotherapy. These results suggested that IL-6 signaling possibly is involved in the progression and treatment-resistance of OSCC and IL-6 expression in cancer cells could be a useful predictive factor of poor response to chemoradiotherapy and unfavorable prognosis.

Intraoperative frozen section histological analysis of resection samples is useful for the control of primary lesions in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

To ensure reliable surgical margins, intraoperative frozen section histological analysis (FS) has been performed since October, 2005 as follows: i) the orientation at the anatomical position and extent of the tumor are shared between oral pathologists and oral surgeons using imaging evaluations and pathological pictures and the planned site of sampling for intraoperative FS is confirmed; ii) a tumor team is organized and the team marks the tumor area and sets the resection range to correct the setting errors of the resection range among operators; iii) vital Lugol staining is applied to the lesion prior to tumor resection, the surgical margin is set based on the non-stained region and the extent of the tumor is macroscopically confirmed in the maximum cross-sectional surface of the resected specimen; and iv) FS is performed using samples from resected specimens to confirm the mucoepithelium and safety margin of the deep stump. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of our FS method. The treatment outcomes of oral squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively investigated in patients treated prior to (Group 1) and after (Group 2) the introduction of our FS method. The recurrence rate of the primary lesions was high (17.3%) in Group 1, but decreased significantly in Group 2 (6.9%). Regarding clinicopathological factors, the condition of the surgical margins was associated with recurrence of the primary lesion in Group 1, but not in Group 2. In conclusion, our FS method appears to be useful for resecting tumors with reliable safety margins.

Multicenter phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

We evaluated whether preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy is feasible and efficacious in the treatment of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Participants comprised 39 patients with oral carcinoma (stage III, n = 15; stage IVA, n = 24). All patients received a total radiation dose of 40 Gy, in once-daily 2-Gy fractions, and received S-1 at 65 mg/m²/day for 5 consecutive days, over 4 consecutive weeks with concurrent radiotherapy.

Results

Hematological toxicity was mild and reversible. The most common non-hematological toxicity was grade 3 mucositis, but this was transient and tolerable. Radical surgery was performed for 37 patients, with the remaining 2 patients declining the surgery. Postoperatively, local failure developed in 1 patient, and neck failure in 2 patients. Distant metastases were identified in 4 patients. At a median follow-up of 38.0 months (range 23–88 months), locoregional control, disease-specific survival, and overall survival rates at 3 years were 91.5, 83.8, and 83.8 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Concurrent administration of S-1 and radiotherapy combined with surgery offers a well-tolerated method of successfully treating advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. The locoregional control rate remains high even at 3 years of follow-up, and no serious adverse effects have been encountered.

Systemic therapy strategies for head-neck carcinomas: Current status

Head and neck cancers, most of which are squamous cell tumours, have an unsatisfactory prognosis despite intensive local treatment. This can be attributed, among other factors, to tumour recurrences inside or outside the treated area, and metastases at more distal locations. These tumours therefore require not only the standard surgical and radiation treatments, but also effective systemic modalities. The main option here is antineoplastic chemotherapy, which is firmly established in the palliative treatment of recurrent or metastatic stages of disease, and is used with curative intent in the form of combined simultaneous or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable or advanced tumour stages. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for tumour reduction before surgery have yet to gain acceptance. Induction chemotherapy protocols before radiotherapy have to date been used in patients at high risk of distant metastases or as an aid for decision-making ("chemoselection") in those with extensive laryngeal cancers, prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy or laryngectomy. Triple-combination induction therapy (taxanes, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) shows high remission rates with significant toxicity and, in combination with (chemo-)radiotherapy, is currently being compared with simultaneous chemoradiotherapy; the current gold standard with regards to efficacy and long-term toxicity.A further systemic treatment strategy, called "targeted therapy", has been developed to help increase specificity and reduce toxicity. An example of targeted therapy, EGFR-specific antibodies, can be used in palliative settings and, in combination with radiotherapy, to treat advanced head and neck cancers. A series of other novel biologicals such as signal cascade inhibitors, genetic agents, or immunotherapies, are currently being evaluated in large-scale clinical studies, and could prove useful in patients with advanced, recurring or metastatic head and neck cancers. When developing a lasting, individualised systemic tumour therapy, the critical evaluation criteria are not only efficacy and acute toxicity but also (long-term) quality-of-life and the identification of dedicated predictive biomarkers.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: a 26-year experience

Background. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant platinum-based radiochemotherapy (RCT) in patients with maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma and to compare the results with other multimodality treatment concepts for advanced-stage maxillary sinus carcinoma in the literature. Methods. In total, 53 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received a neoadjuvant RCT containing either cisplatin or carboplatin followed by radical surgery. Overall survival and locoregional control were plotted by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Prognostic factors were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis. Results. Five-year overall survival for all patients was 35%. Eleven patients achieved a complete response after radiochemotherapy. The complete response rate was significantly higher for patients treated with cisplatin (P = 0.028); however the 5-year overall survival rates did not differ significantly (P = 0.673) for patients treated with cisplatin (37%) and carboplatin (32%). Orbital invasion (P = 0.005) and complete response to radiochemotherapy (P = 0.021) had a significant impact on overall survival in univariate analysis. Conclusions. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery is an effective treatment for patients with advanced maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma. In terms of treatment response cisplatin seems to be more effective than carboplatin.

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stages II-IV oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis and the future possibility of this treatment strategy

This study evaluated survival in 154 patients with stages II-IV oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and assessed the future use of this treatment strategy. 14 patients exhibited advanced stage II, 73 exhibited stage III and 67 exhibited stage IV. All patients received 40Gy irradiation and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy in two courses. Radical surgery was undertaken after 2-6 weeks. The clinical tumour response, histopathologic regression grade, residual tumour grade (RGrade) in the primary tumour and the level of residual pN+ were associated with prognosis. 90% of patients with complete response and 73% of patients with good partial response in the primary tumour were RGrade 0 (no residual tumour cells) or RGrade 1 (viable tumour cells remained within central superficial portion). In patients with complete response in the neck, residual pN+ was only seen in levels IB (8%) and IIA (8%); the higher the level of residual pN+, the lower the survival rate (p<0.0001). This treatment strategy was excellent for stages II-IV OSCC. It may be possible to perform minimally invasive surgery in which the extent of resection in primary tumour and neck is reduced in patients who achieve good response following preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

The treatment of oral cancer: an overview for dental professionals

Oral cancer is a serious life-threatening disease. Dental professionals may be the first individuals to identify/suspect these lesions before referring to oral and maxillofacial surgeons and oral medicine specialists. Because the general dentist will likely follow on with the patient's future oral health, it is important that he or she has a basic understanding of the various treatments involved in treating oral malignancies and their respective outcomes. The four main modalities discussed in this review include surgery alone, radiotherapy alone, surgery with radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with or without surgery and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy has become an area of great interest with the introduction of new 'targeted therapies' demonstrating promising results in conjunction with surgery. Despite these results, the toxicities associated with chemotherapy regimens are frequent and can be severe, and therefore may not be suitable for all patients. Treatment modalities have improved significantly over the decades with overall decreases in recurrence rates, improved disease-free and overall survival, and an improved quality of life. Prognosis, however, is still ultimately dependent on the clinical stage of the tumour at the initial diagnosis with respect to size, depth, extent, and metastasis as recurrence rates and survival rates plummet with disease progression.

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an important part of the management of oral cavity cancer with regard to both the removal of the primary tumour and removal of lymph nodes in the neck. Surgery is less frequently used in oropharyngeal cancer. Surgery alone may be treatment for early stage disease or surgery may be used in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy/biotherapy. There is variation in the recommended timing and extent of surgery in the overall treatment regimens of people with these cancers.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which surgical treatment modalities for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers result in increased overall survival, disease free survival, progression free survival and reduced recurrence.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following electronic databases were searched: the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 17 February 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 17 February 2011) and EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 17 February 2011). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours of the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared two or more surgical treatment modalities or surgery versus other treatment modalities.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias was undertaken independently by two or more review authors. Study authors were contacted for additional information as required. Adverse events data were collected from published trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials (n = 669; 667 with cancers of the oral cavity) satisfied the inclusion criteria, but none were assessed as low risk of bias. Trials were grouped into three main comparisons. Four trials compared elective neck dissection (ND) with therapeutic neck dissection in patients with oral cavity cancer and clinically negative neck nodes, but differences in type of surgery and duration of follow-up made meta-analysis inappropriate. Three of these trials reported overall and disease free survival. One trial showed a benefit for elective supraomohyoid neck dissection compared to therapeutic ND in overall and disease free survival. Two trials found no difference between elective radical ND and therapeutic ND for the outcomes of overall survival and disease free survival. All four trials found reduced locoregional recurrence following elective ND.A further two trials compared elective radical ND with elective selective ND and found no difference in overall survival, disease free survival or recurrence. The final trial compared surgery plus radiotherapy to radiotherapy alone but data were unreliable because the trial stopped early and there were multiple protocol violations.None of the trials reported quality of life as an outcome. Two trials, evaluating different comparisons reported adverse effects of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Seven included trials evaluated neck dissection surgery in patients with oral cavity cancers. The review found weak evidence that elective neck dissection of clinically negative neck nodes at the time of removal of the primary tumour results in reduced locoregional recurrence, but there is insufficient evidence to conclude that elective neck dissection increases overall survival or disease free survival compared to therapeutic neck dissection. There is very weak evidence from one trial that elective supraomohyoid neck dissection may be associated with increased overall and disease free survival. There is no evidence that radical neck dissection increases overall survival compared to conservative neck dissection surgery. Reporting of adverse events in all trials was poor and it was not possible to compare the quality of life of patients undergoing different surgeries.

Podoplanin expression predicts prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

Despite new therapeutic approaches patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma still have a dismal prognosis. The main factor contributing to this problem is locoregional failure due to a lack of response to treatment. Several trials have proven the effect of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery in comparison to primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy. No reliable parameters have been identified so far to predict response to radiochemotherapy. The aim of our study was to assess whether podoplanin expression in pretreatment biopsies could serve as a biomarker to predict the host response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. In this retrospective study, podoplanin expression was examined in a set of 63 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma by immunohistochemistry. We analyzed associations between the level of podoplanin expression and various clinicopathologic parameters, including response to radiochemotherapy, clinical and histological N-status. Furthermore we evaluated the effects of these parameters on overall survival and on locoregional control in univariate and multivariate analysis. The χ(2)-test revealed that high expression of podoplanin in pretreatment biopsy material was associated with non-regression of the tumor (p=0.013) and poor overall survival (p<0.001). Five-year survival rates of 92.9% for patients with weak expression and 15.0% for high expression were revealed. Podoplanin expression was also significantly associated with ypN status (p=0.004) and ypUICC status (p<0.001). We concluded that podoplanin might serve as a factor to predict treatment response in oral squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant platin-based radiochemotherapy as well as a prognostic factor for overall survival and locoregional control.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.

Prognostic impact of different TNM-based stage groupings for oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of different TNM-based stage groupings proposed in the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 300 patients with primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (T1-4, N0-2, M0). The stage grouping systems of the sixth edition of the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC), T and N Integer Score (TANIS), the Snyderman scheme, the Hart scheme, and the Berg scheme were tested for their prognostic significance. Disease free survival (DFS) was plotted by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Prognostic factors were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, all systems revealed discriminatory power for DFS; however, on multivariate analysis, only the Hart scheme predicted DFS. The TANIS did not have a better prognostic ability than the UICC stage grouping.

CONCLUSION

Unlike in previous studies, the UICC stage grouping did perform worse than other TNM-based stage groupings, which may be due to the alterations made in the sixth edition.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 28th July 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other possible sources of bias. Data were extracted using a specially designed form and entered into the characteristics of included studies table and the analysis sections of the review. The proportion of participants in each trial with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are recorded in Additional Table 1.

MAIN RESULTS

There was no statistically significant improvement in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone in 25 trials (hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone in 10 trials (HR of mortality 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99), and there was an additional benefit of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy in 4 of these trials (HR of mortality 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98). Concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone in patients whose tumours were considered unresectable in 25 trials (HR of mortality 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). However, the additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy is associated with a 9% increase in survival and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a 16% increase in overall survival following surgery. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed a 22% benefit in overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone.

Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal and floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma and concomitant histological verification of singular ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis (pN1-state)--a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a comprehensive cohort design

Background

Modern radiotherapy plays an important role in therapy of advanced head and neck carcinomas. However, no clinical studies have been published addressing the effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with small tumor (pT1, pT2) and concomitant ipsilateral metastasis of a single lymph node (pN1), which would provide a basis for a general treatment recommendation.

Methods/Design

The present study is a non-blinded, prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). As the primary clinical endpoint, overall-survival in patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy vs. patients without adjuvant therapy following curative intended surgery is compared. The aim of the study is to enroll 560 adult males and females for 1:1 randomization to one of the two treatment arms (irradiation/no irradiation). Since patients with small tumor (T1/T2) but singular lymph node metastasis are rare and the amount of patients consenting to randomization is not predictable in advance, all patients rejecting randomization will be treated as preferred and enrolled in a prospective observational study (comprehensive cohort design) after giving informed consent. This observational part of the trial will be performed with maximum consistency to the treatment and observation protocol of the RCT. Because the impact of patient preference for a certain treatment option is not calculable, parallel design of RCT and observational study may provide a maximum of evidence and efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcome. Secondary clinical endpoints are as follows: incidence and time to tumor relapse (locoregional relapse, lymph node involvement and distant metastatic spread), Quality of life as reported by EORTC (QLQ-C30 with H&N 35 module), and time from operation to orofacial rehabilitation. All tumors represent a homogeneous clinical state and therefore additional investigation of protein expression levels within resection specimen may serve for establishment of surrogate parameters of patient outcome.

Conclusion

The inherent challenges of a rare clinical condition (pN1) and two substantially different therapy arms would limit the practicality of a classical randomized study. The concept of a Comprehensive Cohort Design combines the preference of a randomized study, with the option of careful data interpretation within an observational study.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00964977

Outcome and histopathologic regression in oral squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative radiochemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Preoperative radiochemotherapy has been reported to enhance tumor response and to improve long-term survival in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This retrospective study evaluates regression rate and long-term survival in 228 patients with primary oral squamous cell carcinoma treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and radical surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with biopsy-proven, resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma - TNM stages II-IV without distant metastasis - received preoperative treatment consisting of fractioned irradiation of the primary and the regional lymph nodes with a total dose of 40 Gy and additional cisplatin (n = 160) or carboplatin (n = 68) during the 1st week of treatment. Radical surgery and neck dissection followed after a delay of 10-14 days. The study only included cases with histologically negative resection margins.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 53 patients (23.2%) had experienced local-regional recurrence. The median 2-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 86.2%. 5-year DSS and 10-year DSS were 76.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Complete histological local tumor regression after surgery (ypT0) was observed in 50 patients (21.9%) and was independent of pretreatment tumor classification. Uni- and multivariate survival analysis revealed that ypT- and ypN-stage were the most decisive predictors for DSS.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiochemotherapy with cisplatin/carboplatin followed by radical surgery attains favorable long-term survival rates. This applies especially to cases with complete histological tumor regression after radiochemotherapy, which can be assumed for one of five patients.

[Surgical treatment options for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity]

The squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity comprises 3% of all new cancer cases. 10% have a hereditary component. Smokers stand at a 3-fold higher risk with alcohol as an additive factor. 6 to 10 independent genetic events are expected to take place until invasive carcinoma occurs. Chromosomal deletion may also be detected in premalignant lesions. Staging is performed with inspection including endoscopy, CT- and MR-Scans and biopsy for the primary tumour and chest-X-ray, CT, Ultrasound and Scintigraphy for the N and M stage routinely. Therapeutic options that are proven best are radiation or/and surgery for T1 and T2 stages with a 5-year survival rate between 80% and 100%. Multimodal therapies, also including chemotherapy for higher stages result in 5-year survival rates between 55% and 62%. Since recurrence and metastasis have very poor prognosis sufficient and radical primary therapy is crucial. Palliative chemotherapy may be applied for functional improvement and pain release without statistical prove for increased survival rates.

HDR brachytherapy irradiation of the jaw - as a new experimental model of radiogenic bone damage

INTRODUCTION

Hitherto, no suitable experimental model exists to test new treatments for radiogenic bone damage, such as new step from knowledge about bone growth factors or angiogenesis factors. The goal of this investigation was to establish such a standardised experimental model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-four rats were used in this study. In 12 rats a plastic tube was implanted along the right half of the mandible and treated with a single dose of 20 Gy at a high-dose-rate (HDR) using an afterloading machine, the remainder served as control (n=12). One hundred days after irradiation both sides of the mandible were examined using paraffin embedding and non-decalcified histology.

RESULTS

All HDR irradiated rats developed localised alopecia within 2 weeks of radiotherapy. In the irradiated group, a clear growth reduction of the ipsilateral incisor was observed. Paraffin histology revealed minimal damage of the bone structure with slightly increased signs of regeneration. The bone apposition rate was significantly reduced on the irradiated right side, compared with the left side (p=0.028). The average diameter of the mandibular condyles on the irradiated right sides was significantly reduced when compared with the left sides (p=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to induce radiogenic damage of the mandible by using HDR brachytherapy with a single dose of 20 Gy comparable to 45 x 2 Gy of conventional irradiation. This new model is easy and predictable and appears to be suitable for the testing of new treatment modalities. It is advantageous for the testing of bone growth and angiogenesis factors that the contralateral side exhibits completely normal bone apposition characteristics enabling a split-mouth design for future experiments.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the management of oral cancer: a review

INTRODUCTION

Multi-modality treatment concepts involving preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and subsequent radical resection are used much less frequently than postoperative treatment for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. In some centres, however, the preoperative approach has been established for several years.

MATERIAL

The present review is a compilation of the existing evidence on this subject.

METHODS

In a literature-based meta-analysis, the survival data of 1927 patients from 32 eligible publications were analysed.

RESULTS

The calculated survival rates of documented patients show remarkably good results with preoperative CRT and radical surgery. However, the findings of this analysis are based on data with a large proportion of studies using consecutive patient series.

CONCLUSION

Hard evidence providing sufficient data from prospective randomised studies is as yet missing for preoperative CRT. Prospective randomised studies are mandatory in this area.

Intra-arterial chemoradiation for T3-4 oral cavity cancer: treatment outcomes in comparison to oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

Surgery followed by radiotherapy is the standard of care for resectable locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We report the treatment outcomes of patients with T3-T4 SCC of the oral cavity treated with chemoradiation, an alternative approach.

Patients and methods

From a series of 240 patients with stage III-IV carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract who were treated consecutively according to the RADPLAT protocol, a subset analysis of 155 patients with T3-T4 SCC (Oral cavity SCC N = 22, oropharynx SCC N = 94 and hypopharynx SCC N = 39), was performed. The goal was to test the hypothesis that oral cavity SCC treated with chemoradiation has similar outcomes to the two comparison sites.

Results

With a median follow-up of 58 months, local disease control was 69% and the overall survival was 37%. In comparison, local disease control for the oropharynx and hypopharynx groups was 86% and 79% respectively. The overall survival rate for the oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal groups were 41% and 6% respectively

Conclusion

Patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer treated with the chemoradiation protocol RADPLAT have outcomes that are equal or better compared to patients with similar disease involving the oropharynx and hypopharynx

BMP-2 and bFGF in an irradiated bone model

INTRODUCTION

Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is considered to enhance angiogenesis and to support bone formation in the presence of vital bone cells. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is known to induce bone formation. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of bFGF and rhBMP-2 in the irradiated mandible.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The right mandibles of 24 rats were irradiated with a single dose of 20 Gy at a high-dose-rate (HDR) after loading machine (bio effective equivalent dose to ca. 45 x 2 Gy). After 12 weeks 100 microg rhBMP-2 (n=6 animals, group 1), 100 microg bFGF (n=6 animals, group 2) and 100 microg rhBMP-2 plus 100 microg bFGF (n=6 animals, group 3) were injected along the right mandible (left mandible: no irradiation, no growth factor). Another 6 animals (group 4) remained untreated after the irradiation. After another 7 weeks the specimens were examined by non-decalcified histology.

RESULTS

Bone apposition of the experimental versus control sides was not statistically significantly different when one of the growth factors was applied alone (rhBMP-2: p=0.917; bFGF: p=0.345). Average bone apposition was significantly decreased on the experimental sides of group 3 (rhBMP-2+bFGF: p=0.046) and group 4 (p=0.008). Average bone densities were unaffected in all settings (for all p>0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of bFGF and the application of rhBMP-2 alone did result in predictable bone generation in the irradiated mandible with the bone apposition being equal to that of the non-irradiated side. The application of both growth factors together or none at all after irradiation results in significantly reduced bone apposition.

Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

Oral and oropharyngeal cancers can be managed by surgery alone or with any combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy/biotherapy. Opinions on the surgical treatment, the optimal combinational therapy and the sequence of treatments in combinational therapy varies enormously.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which surgical treatment modalities for oral and oropharyngeal cancers lead to the best outcomes compared with other surgical, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy/biotherapy combinations.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, OLDMEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED and the National Cancer Trials Database. Reference lists from relevant articles were searched and the authors of eligible trials were contacted. Date of the most recent searches: July 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of surgery alone or in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or immunotherapy/biotherapy for the treatment of primary oral or oropharyngeal cancer or both.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A minimum of two review authors conducted data extraction. Risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes at different time intervals, and hazard ratios were extracted or calculated for disease-free survival, total mortality, and disease-related mortality. Additional information from trial authors was sought. Data on adverse events were collected from the trial reports.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-one trials satisfied the inclusion criteria, only 13 of which were assessed as low risk of bias. Trials were grouped into 12 main comparisons. There were no trials that compared different surgical modalities of the primary tumour itself. However, there were a number of trials comparing different approaches to managing the cervical lymph nodes. The majority of treatment regimens under evaluation were surgery in combination with other modalities. As individual treatment regimens within each comparison varied, meta-analysis was inappropriate in most instances. Only two trials could be pooled, comparing concomitant radio/chemotherapy (with surgery) versus radiotherapy (with surgery). A statistically significant difference was shown for disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64 to 0.92) and total mortality (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.95) in favour of the concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (with surgery) arm. No other treatment regimens showed consistent statistically significant results across the outcomes measured.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence that concomitant radio/chemotherapy (with surgery) is more effective than radiotherapy (with surgery) and may benefit outcomes in patients with more advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancers. As these trials were based on head and neck studies, future studies should evaluate this treatment regimen specifically in oral and oropharyngeal cancers separately and also address tumour staging and its impact on outcomes. In general, future studies are encouraged to evaluate site-specific and stage-specific data for oral and oropharyngeal cancers. Future trials should include health-related quality of life assessment as an outcome measure. There is a need for a consolidated standardised approach to reporting adverse events.

Mortality and Causes of Death After Multimodality Treatment for Advanced Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze mortality and causes of death in patients who received preoperative radiochemotherapy and underwent radical surgery for advanced oral or oropharyngeal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 222 patients who underwent multimodality treatment from 1990 to 2000 were included in the study. The inclusion criterion was International Union Against Cancer (UICC) disease stage II to IV (T2, 33.3%; T3, 12.6%; T4, 54.1%). Patients received preoperative radiotherapy 50 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy with mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil. Radical local-regional en bloc resection was performed in all patients. Survival status and causes of death were ascertained from the National Health Registry. Death certificates and autopsy reports were consulted when hospital files failed to provide reliable data.

RESULTS

After a median surveillance period of 72.3 months (range, 24 to 152 months), 59% of patients were alive, 21% had died of recurrence, 5% had died perioperatively, and 15% had died from other causes. Of these, a second cancer in the head and neck region or the lower respiratory tract or the upper digestive tract was found in 7.3%. Although 93% of deaths related to recurrent disease occurred within the first 36 months after surgery, the remaining causes of death did not reveal a specific temporal pattern.

CONCLUSION

Favorable survival data were registered for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who underwent combined treatment protocols. These patients frequently die of comorbidities. Because recurrent disease is a less common cause of mortality than are other causes, the latter should receive attention during surveillance.

Overall Survival of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated With Different Treatment Modalities

Therapeutic modalities of use in tumor therapy can be applied in various combinations to treat malignant lesions of the mesopharynx. A study was made of the overall survival of patients with mesopharyngeal carcinoma treated with different modalities in our institution in the period 1995-2000. In this retrospective study, a total of 66 patients were divided into 4 groups: Patients who took part in 1) intra-arterial chemotherapy and subsequent irradiation; 2) intra-arterial chemotherapy and surgical care; 3) only surgical care; or 4) only irradiation or palliative treatment. In each group, the five-year survival rate was examined, as a function of the age of the patient, the initial tumor size, the lymph node status and the clinical stage. The five-year overall survival rate in group 1 was 28.57%, in both group 2 and group 3 was 66.66%, and in group 4 was 20%. For all of the 66 patients, it was 43.93%. For groups 2 and 3, the Kendall rank correction test did not reveal a significant effect of the lymph node state or the clinical stage on the survival, whereas the effects of the age and the initial tumor size did prove to be significant. The Cox regression test showed the latter of these two effects to be the stronger. As 64 of the 66 patients examined were treated for tumors in clinical stages III or IV, the five-year survival rate of 43.93% may be said to be good. The comparison of groups 2 and 3 revealed that (in spite of the poorer initial prognosis in group 2) the survival rates were the same, i.e. the neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy improved the prognosis.

Influence of Previous Radiotherapy on Free Tissue Transfer in the Head and Neck Region: Evaluation of 455 Cases

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the effect of prior radiotherapy (XRT) on the outcome of microvascular free tissue transfer in the head and neck region.

METHODS

Four hundred fifty-five patients, subdivided into three groups, were analyzed. Groups I (no previous XRT, n=110), II (previous radiochemotherapy with 50 Gy focus dosage in the primary treatment regime for oral cancer, n=322), and III (secondary reconstruction after XRT-induced complications, n=23) were compared regarding flap success rate, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, duration of intensive care (DOIC), and hospitalization (DOH).

RESULTS

Flap success did not differ significantly across groups (I: 95.5%, II: 93.2%, III: 91.3%. Risk of postoperative complications was significantly lower for group I (12.7%) compared with groups II (23.9%) and III (39.1%). DOIC and DOH were significantly shorter for patients in group I than for those in groups II and III.

CONCLUSIONS

XRT before free tissue transfer does not significantly increase flap loss or postoperative mortality but does increase postoperative complications and length of hospitalization.

Experience with microvascular free flaps in preoperatively irradiated tissue of the oral cavity and oropharynx in 303 patients

This study examined free flap reconstruction of surgical defects of the oral cavity and oropharynx after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Included in this analysis are 303 prospectively followed patients who underwent a multimodal treatment regime for advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. All patients received preoperative radiochemotherapy (Mitomycin C, 5-FU, 50 Gy), ablative surgery, and primary free flap reconstruction. Patient characteristics, surgical parameters like duration of surgery and ischaemia, size of defect, type of transplant, and clinical outcome parameters like duration of intensive care and hospitalization, type of complications, necessity and type of revision surgery were statistically evaluated. Overall flap success rate was 93.1%. Sixty seven patients required revision and 21 flaps (6.9%) were lost. Overall complication rate was 22.1%. Mean duration of intensive care (DOIC) and duration of overall postoperative hospitalization (DOH) were 11.0+/-9.6 days and 35.9+/-26.3 days, respectively. Flap success and flap related complications after 50 Gy focal radiation dosage were found in a comparable range as in published series of reconstructions in uncompromised tissue.

Preoperative radiochemotherapy and radical resection for stages II to IV oral and oropharyngeal cancer: grade of regression as crucial prognostic factor

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of histological response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in an established multimodal therapy concept for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Two hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT: 50 Gy, mitomycin C and fluorouracil) and radical surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Resected tumours of all patients were histologically analysed and response to RCT was classified in histopathological grades of regression (RG). In a multivariate statistical analysis, RG was compared with established factors regarding their predictive value for overall and disease-specific survival. The 5-year overall survival probability in the different groups of histopathological regression grades were: RG1 (no vital tumour): 73.4%, RG2 (minimal tumour remnants encompassing less than 5%): 72.1%, RG3 (5-50% vital tumour cells): 41.9%, RG4 (more than 50% vital tumour): 37.9%. For disease-specific survival probability no significant differences were found between both groups of "responders" (RG1 and RG2) nor between "non-responders" (RG3 and RG4), whereas responders and non-responders differed significantly from each other (log-rank test; p < 0.001). T-classification, N-classification and disease stage, histological grading, tumour site, age, and sex had less prognostic value than RG in a Cox regression model. In the neoadjuvant multimodal therapy concept, histological response to preoperative RCT is a crucial prognostic factor even when surgical R0-resection is accomplished. Thus, non-responders have to be regarded as high-risk patients for recurrence and may benefit from further therapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy: an emerging concept in oncology

Neoadjuvant therapy, an adjunctive therapy given before the main therapy, has become an integral part of modem multidisciplinary cancer management. Organized by the primary organ involved by cancer, this review summarizes the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy for common malignant solid tumors, based on large, randomized, controlled trials. In locally advanced rectal, laryngeal, and breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy enables organ preservation; however, it does not improve overall survival when compared with definitive treatment followed by adjuvant therapy. In locally advanced bladder and cervical cancer, patients who undergo neoadjuvant therapy before radical surgery appear to have better survival than those receiving definitive therapy alone; however, it is unclear if the neoadjuvant approach will be superior to definitive therapy followed by adjuvant therapy. To date, the survival benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable non-small cell lung, esophageal, gastric, and prostate cancer remains under investigation.

Preoperative radiochemotherapy and radical resection for stages II–IV oral and oropharyngeal cancer: outcome of 222 patients

To analyse survival and locoregional control in patients with advanced oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after multimodal therapy with preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) and radical surgery. We included in this analysis 222 patients who underwent multimodal therapy between 1990 and 2000. Eligible were patients with UICC disease stages II-IV (T2: 33.3%; T3: 12.6%; T4: 54.1%; N0: 45.9%; N1: 17.6%; N2: 33.3%; N3: 3.2%; stage II: 21.1%; stage III: 14.9%; stage IV: 64%). Patients received preoperative radiochemotherapy consisting of Mitomycin C (15-20 mg/m2, day 1) plus 5-Fluorouracil (750 mg/m2/24 h-infusion, days 1-5) and concomitant radiotherapy for a total dose of 50 Gy. Radical locoregional en bloc-resection according to the pretherapeutic tumour extension was carried out in all patients. After a median surveillance period of 72.3 months (24-152 months), 131 patients (59%) were alive, and 91 (41%) patients died; 12 (5%) of them died postoperatively, 46 (21%) due to tumour recurrence, and 33 (15%) deaths were not directly related to the primary tumour. Overall survival probability was 76% after 2 years, and 62% after 5 years. Two- and 5-year local control probability were 88 and 81%, respectively. Regarding the high percentage of stage IV disease in the reported patients, the multimodal concept is an effective therapy offering excellent survival and local control probability.

Two stage reconstruction with revascularized grafts after resection of retromolar and oropharyngeal carcinoma

The clinical outcome of two stage reconstruction with revascularized grafts after resection of extensive retromolar and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in 17 patients is presented. In the first operation, the intraoral soft tissue defect was covered by a revascularized jejunal flap, and the mandibular defect was bridged by a reconstruction plate. After a period of 5-28 months, mandibular reconstruction was performed with a microsurgically revascularized iliac crest graft that was positioned under the jejunal graft. Clinical follow up included tumour recurrence rate, the form of nutrition, speech disorders and mouth opening restrictions. Quality of life was analysed by the EORTC questionnaires. Fifteen patients were free of recurrence and alive. Twelve patients were able to swallow food. The jejunal flap provided perfect lining of the soft palate, the pharynx and the base of the tongue, thus supporting functional restoration. Despite the gravity of disease and invasiveness of therapy, the two stage procedure leads to satisfying functional and aesthetic results thus obtaining appropriate QOL.

Plattenepithelkarzinome der Mundh�hle

INTRODUCTION

In patients with oral cancer the treatment has a strong impact on the quality of life. In recent years different therapeutic concepts have been developed, which include preoperative simultaneous 'neoadjuvant' radiochemotherapy (RCT) and one-stage surgery with tumour ablation and reconstruction. Consideration of long-term survival rates yields substantial evidence that mixed-modality treatment including neoadjuvant RCT is superior to adjuvant therapy concepts based on a surgical approach with postoperative radiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this nonrandomised longitudinal prospective study quality of life was evaluated in two groups made up of a total of 53 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, 26 of whom underwent neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with subsequent surgical resection while the remaining 27 received surgical treatment first and then postoperative radiotherapy. The quality-of-life core questionnaire (QLQ C-30) and the head and neck cancer module (H&N 35) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) were used. Long-term survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS

Postoperatively both groups showed a marked reduction in quality of life, especially in restricted chewing, swallowing and speaking. One year later their quality of life had improved substantially, though without quite reaching the preoperative quality-of-life scores. Both groups showed specific impairments in the symptom scales. With adjustment for the fact that the patients were not randomised, long-term survival was 78% in the neoadjuvant treatment group and 50% in the adjuvant treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Temporary limitations in the quality of life can be expected after tumour treatment of the kinds presented here for oral cancer. Neoadjuvant therapy concept is more aggressive and might result in longer disease-free survival. The primary goal should be eradication of the tumour. Nevertheless preservation or reconstruction of a maximum of function is essential for a high level of quality of life. Combined-modality treatments seem to be superior to any kind of monotherapy and should therefore be preferred.

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: evaluation of tumor response by CT differs from histopathologic response assessment in a significant fraction of patients

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare and assess the predictive value of CT and histopathologic grading of tumor regression at primary tumor sites in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx after neoadjuvant (preoperative) radiochemotherapy (RCT).

METHODS

We investigated 55 patients with carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx who underwent RCT before curative surgery. Two blinded observers measured RCT-induced reduction of tumor volume in pretherapeutic and posttherapeutic CT scans. Volume changes were compared with histopathologic findings obtained at surgery.

RESULTS

Histopathologic response evaluation revealed 31 complete remissions, 12 cases of partial response, and 12 nonresponders. We performed a logistic regression analysis to evaluate whether measured volume reduction could predict the likelihood of belonging to a certain response group. Taken together, we found 35 correct, 12 false-negative, and seven false-positive predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of remission as assessed by CT scans 4 to 5 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant RCT leads to false predictions in a significant percentage of patients.

AUC of Calvert's formula in targeted intra-arterial carboplatin chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oral cavity

We investigated whether intra-arterial administration of carboplatin using Calvert's formula is useful for avoiding thrombocytopenia in targeted chemoradiotherapy in patients with squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Carboplatin was infused intra-arterially under digital subtraction angiography in 28 patients. In the first group of patients, the dose of carboplatin was calculated according to the body surface area (BS group). In the second group, the dose was calculated using Calvert's formula (AUC group). The value for AUC (area under concentration vs time curve; mg ml⁻¹ min⁻¹) in the formula was set at 4.5. All patients received concurrent radiotherapy (30 Gy) and were given oral tegafur-uracil (UFT®, 400–600 mg day⁻¹). The AUC group showed a significantly lower percentage platelet reduction than the BS group (49.0±22.0 vs 65.1±23.2%; P=0.045) and also tended to have a higher platelet nadir count (10.9±4.2 vs 8.4±5.8 × 10⁴; P=0.27) without reducing the antitumour effect. The value of 4.5 for target AUC is recommended clinically. However, AUC of Calvert's formula could not predict thrombocytopenia associated with intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy due to the variability of the actual AUC.

Evaluation of quality of life of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of two treatment protocols in a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In recent years, various therapeutic concepts have been developed for treating oral cancer, these include preoperative simultaneous "neoadjuvant" radio-chemotherapy and one-stage-surgery with tumour ablation and reconstruction. When considering long-term survival, there is substantial evidence that the neoadjuvant therapy is superior to the primary surgical approach with postoperative radiation. Both treatment concepts, however, have a strong impact on the quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study prospectively evaluates and compares quality of life in 53 patients with oral cancer treated according to a neoadjuvant concept or primarily surgically, using the questionnaires QLQ C-30 and H and N35 by the EORTC.

RESULTS

Initially both groups showed a marked reduction in the quality of life. Despite a clear improvement in the first postoperative year baseline values were not reached in most of the scores. Specific long-lasting impairments in the symptom scales concerning oral functions were found in both treatment arms. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, however, especially global health and the emotional status were reduced to a higher degree than in the other group. This was particularly noticeable in the early treatment phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Following an initial deterioration of quality-of-life after 3 months a gradual improvement of physical and psychological function was observed in the course of the first post-treatment year in both groups. Severe side effects can be observed. These side effects vary strongly in their individual expression. Limitations in the quality of life can be justified, if the more aggressive therapy resulted in a better disease free survival.

Results and failures with or without cisplatin containing induction chemotherapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

This prospective randomised study was undertaken to assess the effects and effectiveness of cisplatin in a pre-operative setting. Thirty-eight patients were treated with stage II-IVa (AJCC) squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Nineteen patients received a combination of bleomycin, vincristine, methotrexate (BVM; group I.), 19 received BVM and cisplatin (group II). Patients underwent surgery within 3 weeks after chemotherapy. Biopsy and surgical specimens were compared. A clinical complete response was seen in five patients in group I (26.3%) and in four patients in group II (21.1%). Partial response was noted in 11 patients in group I (57.8%) and in 13 patients in group II (68.4%). There was no statistical difference in clinical response between the two groups. Microscopic response was better in the cisplatin treated group. Median follow up of patients is 52 (36-70) months. Disease free survival showed a significant difference, favouring the no cisplatin group (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in overall survival (P > 0.6). Cisplatin in combination with BVM showed significantly higher levels of microscopic response, but the lower disease free survival is mostly due to a higher rate of regional neck failure.

[Evaluation of her-2/neu amplification/overexpression in OSCC with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry]

INTRODUCTION

The human epidermal growth factor receptor ( her-2/ neu) protooncogene encodes a membrane tyrosine kinase with homology to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Amplification and protein overexpression have been identified in various solid tumors and a significant association with poor clinical outcome was reported. This investigation was performed to assess the frequency of her-2/ neu overexpression and to compare these results with clinical outcome in OSCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Archival biopsy specimens from 97 untreated OSCCs were evaluated using a polyclonal antibody A0485 (Dako). Only membrane staining intensity and pattern were evaluated according to the guidelines of the clinical trial assay recommendations (0-3+) for breast carcinoma. Score 0 and 1+ were interpreted as negative for HER-2/NEU protein overexpression and 2+ and 3+ as positive. FISH analysis with directly labeled probes for her-2/ neu and chromosome 17 was performed on the same specimens. The ratio between her-2/ neu and chromosome 17 signals was calculated after selection of 20-40 non-overlapping tumor cells. The tumor was considered amplified if the ratio was above 2.

RESULTS

In 11 out of 97 biopsies (11.3%) membranous overexpression (score 2+ and 3+) of her-2/ neu was shown by immunohistochemistry. FISH analysis in 42 cases revealed amplification in 14 cases. Concordance between immunohistochemistry and FISH was found in 86%. Clinical-pathological data as well as survival revealed no correlation with her-2/ neu status.

DISCUSSION

In spite of missing correlation between survival and her-2/ neu overexpression in our study, the predictive value of the her-2/ neu protooncogene in adjuvant therapy in OSCC needs further investigation.