Shoulder-arm-syndrome after radical neck dissection: its relation with the innervation of the trapezius muscle

Does Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous Flap Cause the Shoulder Morbidity: A Clinical Comparative Study

The aim was to compare the morbidity of shoulder function following modified radical neck dissection with and without Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous muscle flap (PMMC) harvest in head and neck cancer patient to determine the effect of PMMC flap harvest on shoulder function and also to determine the effect of physiotherapy. Materials and methods: Prospective study involving two groups study group of 20 patients with MRND, with PMMC flap reconstruction as part of head and neck cancer surgery and control group of 20 patients who had undergone MRND(IJV & SAN sparing) without PMMC flap in same period were included. All patients were assessed at 3rd and 6th month following completion of surgery using subjective (Shoulder Disability Questionnaire) and objective (goniometer and manual muscle testing) parameters. 40 patients were included in the study, 33 (82.5%) male and 7 (17.5%) female with a mean age of 49 years with stage III/IV carcinoma In Group-1 and Group-2 the shoulder disability decreased significantly after physiotherapy intervention and also at 6thmonth postoperatively both groups showed improvements in shoulder range of motion and muscle strength. Harvesting of PMMC flap does not intensify the morbidity of shoulder which is common in RND and during MRND. A regimen of home-based exercises and patient education are effective tools to reduce shoulder disability and improving shoulder function.

Comparative Morbidity Profile of Elective vs Therapeutic Neck Dissection

OBJECTIVE

Neck dissection (ND) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in head and neck surgery. We sought to compare the morbidity of elective ND (END) versus therapeutic ND (TND).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care center.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 373 NDs performed from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients with radical ND or inadequate chart documentation were excluded. Demographics, clinicopathologic data, complications, and sacrificed structures during ND were retrieved. Statistical analysis was performed with χ² and analysis of variance for comparison of categorical and continuous variables, respectively, with statistical alpha set a 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients examined consisted of 224 males (60%) with a mean age of 60 years. TND accounted for 79% (n = 296) as compared with 21% (n = 77) for END. Other than a significantly higher history of radiation (37% vs 7%, P < .001) and endocrine pathology (34% vs 2.6%, P < .001) in the TND group, no significant differences in demographics were found between the therapeutic and elective groups. A significantly higher rate of structure sacrifice and extranodal extension within the TND group was noted to hold in overall and subgroup comparisons. No significant difference in rate of surgical complications was appreciated between groups in overall or subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

While the significantly higher rate of structure sacrifice among the TND population represents an increased morbidity profile in these patients, no significant difference was found in the rate of surgical complications between groups. The significant difference seen between groups regarding history of radiation and endocrine pathology likely represents selection bias.

Acupuncture for Cancer Pain - An Adjuvant Therapy for Cancer Pain Relief

As current pain management methods cannot effectively control pain among cancer patients, acupuncture has developed as an adjuvant therapy for cancer pain relief. However, the efficacy of acupuncture in treating cancer pain remains controversial. Here, we briefly introduced the development of pain management, analgesic mechanisms, and acupuncture methods. Meanwhile, a comprehensive overview of acupuncture programs was provided in terms of different cancer types, sources, and degrees. Interestingly, acupuncture can treat both tumor-induced pain and therapy-induced pain well among cancer patients. We preliminarily summarized frequently-used acupoints for different types of cancer pain and found that needle retention time was mostly 30 min, and treatment cycle was two weeks. Additionally, clinicians consistently selected Ashi acupoint or bilateral Zusanli acupoint and combined multiple acupuncture methods for different degrees of cancer pain.

Cervical plexus as anatomical target for the treatment of postoperative cervical neuropathic pain

Objective: The incidence of chronic neuropathic pain following neck dissections is approximately 40%. Standard drug therapy in these patients include pharmacologic treatments due to the neuropathic pain (gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants…). In this case, standard options were limited. The addition of ultrasound guidance to invasive pain management techniques has enabled us to successfully treat pathologies in which previous treatments options had been limited. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) ablation permits treatment over nerve structures that, due to either their morphological or functional characteristics, could not be approached using the conventional variant.

Case report: A 45-year-old man with severe postoperative pain after undergoing partial glossectomy and functional neck dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. The patient had been treated pharmacologically for several years with minimal results, baseline VAS of 90. After a successful superficial cervical plexus block under ultrasound guidance, he underwent PRF for a possible long-lasting effect. VAS post PRF improved in subsequent visits: VAS at 1 month was 0; at 3 months was 10 and at 6 months was 60.

Conclusion: Postoperative changes to include alterations in nerve structures are a frequent source of chronic pain. The incidence of this type of pain in the cervical region is quite variable. Noninvasive treatment options are limited and oftentimes ineffective. Due to its location, superficial cervical plexus is an anatomical site with the potential risk of undergoing structural alterations (fibrosis, radiotherapy-associated retraction phenomena or neuroma formation). Interventional treatments performed under ultrasound guidance allow the dynamic application of therapies such as radiofrequency ablation. PRF could potentially cause an additive effect between neuromodulation and the hydrodissection caused by the infiltration of substances within a fibrotic area.

Neck and Shoulder Motor Function following Neck Dissection: A Comparison with Healthy Control Subjects

Objective

To compare the neck and shoulder motor function of patients following neck dissection, including comparison with a group of healthy volunteers.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Two tertiary hospitals in Brisbane, Australia.

Subjects and Methods

Participants included patients 0.5 to 5 years after unilateral nerve-sparing neck dissection and healthy control subjects. Demographic and clinical information was collected with cervical and shoulder motor function measures (scapular resting position, active range of motion, and isometric muscle strength). Differences between groups were examined via regression analyses that included statistical adjustment for the potential effect of age, sex, body mass index, and other disease-related variables.

Results

The 57 patients (68%, men; median age, 62 years) were typically older than the 34 healthy controls (47%, men; median age, 46 years). There were no differences between types of nerve-preserving neck dissection for any of the motor function measures. When adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, healthy volunteers (vs patients) had significantly greater cervical range (eg, extension coefficient [95% CI]: 11.04° [4.41°-17.67°]), greater affected shoulder range (eg, abduction: 16.64° [1.19°-31.36°]), and greater isometric strength of the cervical flexors (eg, men: 4.24 kgf [1.56-6.93]) and shoulder flexors (eg, men: 8.00 kgf [1.62-14.38]).

Conclusions

Strength and flexibility of the neck and shoulder are impaired following neck dissection in comparison with healthy controls. Clinicians and researchers are encouraged to consider the neck—and the neck dissection as a whole—as a source of motor impairment for these patients and not just the status of the accessory nerve.

Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder pain and dysfunction may occur following neck dissection among people being treated for head and neck cancer. This systematic review aims to examine the prevalence and incidence of shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection and identify risk factors for these post-operative complications.

METHODS

Electronic databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane) were searched for articles including adults undergoing neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Studies that reported prevalence, incidence or risk factors for an outcome of the shoulder or neck were eligible and assessed using the Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies.

RESULTS

Seventy-five articles were included in the final review. Prevalence rates for shoulder pain were slightly higher after RND (range, 10-100%) compared with MRND (range, 0-100%) and SND (range, 9-25%). The incidence of reduced shoulder active range of motion depended on surgery type (range, 5-20%). The prevalence of reduced neck active range of motion after neck dissection was 1-13%. Type of neck dissection was a risk factor for shoulder pain, reduced function and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence and incidence of shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection varies by type of surgery performed and measure of dysfunction used. Pre-operative education for patients undergoing neck dissection should acknowledge the potential for post-operative shoulder and neck problems to occur and inform patients that accessory nerve preservation lowers, but does not eliminate, the risk of developing musculoskeletal complications.

Retrospective Study of Selective Submandibular Neck Dissection versus Radical Neck Dissection for N0 or N1 Necks in Level I Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of selective submandibular neck dissection (SMND) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with or without nodal metastasis. Patients. From a total of 384 patients with untreated OSCC who underwent radical excision, we identified 229 with clinically N0 necks and 68 with clinically N1 necks in level I. Main Outcome Measures. The Kaplan-Meier 5-year regional control and 5-year disease specific survival (DSS) were compared for SMND, radical neck dissection (RND), and modified radical neck dissection (MRND). Results. In clinically node-negative necks, the regional control rates were 85.2% with SMND and 83.3% with MRND (P = 0.89), and 5-year DSS rates were 86.5% and 87.0%, respectively, (P = 0.94). In clinically N1 necks, the regional control rates were 81.3% with SMND and 83.0% with RND (P = 0.72), and the DSS rates were 81.3% and 80.0%, respectively, (P = 0.94). Type of neck dissection was not significantly associated with regional control or DSS on either univariate or multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model. Conclusions. SMND can be effectively applied in elective and therapeutic management to patients with OSCC that are clinically assessed as N0 or N1 to level I of the neck.

A double blind randomised trial of IIb or not IIb neck dissections on electromyography, clinical examination, and questionnaire-based outcomes: a feasibility study

The aim of this double-blind randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the feasibility of a study to compare differences using electromyographic (EMG) or nerve conduction studies (NCS), questionnaires completed by patients, and range of movement, after selective supraomohyoid neck dissection in patients with and without level IIb for node-negative oral cancer. Between January 2006 and July 2008 we recruited 57 previously untreated consecutive patients with node-negative T1 or T2 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the anterior two-thirds of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Thirty-eight patients were randomised (32 unilateral and 6 bilateral dissections) into two groups. Preoperatively and at 6 weeks postoperatively we collected EMG or NCS data on trapezius muscle activity (primary outcome), the University of Washington quality of life scale (UWQoLv4), the neck dissection impairment index (NDII), and range of movement. At 6 months data on range of movement and data from the questionnaires were obtained. There was a greater mean fall in trapezius M-response amplitude for those who had IIb dissected, which suggested that inclusion of this level caused additional morbidity. However, it was not significant for patients who had unilateral dissections or for all necks combined. Changes in M-amplitude from baseline to 6 weeks, and from baseline to 6 months were strongly associated with changes in the shoulder domain of the UWQoL and the NDII, but were less strong for change in range of movement. This feasibility study has shown that a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is achievable. The combination of EMG or NCS with questionnaire data preoperatively and to 6 weeks would suffice and would simplify a new study design.

Morbidity of supraomohyoidal and modified radical neck dissection combined with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to show the investigated impact of supraomohyoidal neck dissection and modified radical neck dissection, both combined with radiotherapy, on cervical range of motion (CROM), mouth opening, swallowing, lymphedema, and shoulder function.

METHODS

One hundred eight patients who had neck dissections and 98 patients who had non-neck dissections were evaluated in a prospective, nonselective, longitudinal cohort study by a physiotherapist and a speech-language pathologist (SLP) before the start of radiotherapy and up to 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

The incidence of shoulder disability after neck dissection was 18%. Supraomohyoidal neck dissection had no significant effect on the evaluated parameters at any time point. Modified radical neck dissection significantly reduced CROM and mouth opening 2 months after treatment, but after 12 months only cervical rotation was still significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with external beam radiation (EBRT), modified radical neck dissection induced additional morbidity regarding CROM but not regarding mouth opening, swallowing, and lymphedema 1 year after treatment. Both modified radical neck dissection and supraomohyoidal neck dissection induced shoulder disability.

Acupuncture for pain and dysfunction after neck dissection: results of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether acupuncture reduces pain and dysfunction in patients with cancer with a history of neck dissection. The secondary objective is to determine whether acupuncture relieves dry mouth in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients at a tertiary cancer center with chronic pain or dysfunction attributed to neck dissection were randomly assigned to weekly acupuncture versus usual care (eg, physical therapy, analgesia, and/or anti-inflammatory drugs, per patient preference or physician recommendation) for 4 weeks. The Constant-Murley score, a composite measure of pain, function, and activities of daily living, was the primary outcome measure. Xerostomia, a secondary end point, was assessed using the Xerostomia Inventory.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight evaluable patients were accrued and randomly assigned from 2004 to 2007 (28 and 30 patients on acupuncture and control arms, respectively). Constant-Murley scores improved more in the acupuncture group (adjusted difference between groups = 11.2; 95% CI, 3.0 to 19.3; P = .008). Acupuncture produced greater improvement in reported xerostomia (adjusted difference in Xerostomia Inventory = -5.8; 95% CI, -0.9 to -10.7; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Significant reductions in pain, dysfunction, and xerostomia were observed in patients receiving acupuncture versus usual care. Although further study is needed, these data support the potential role of acupuncture in addressing post-neck dissection pain and dysfunction, as well as xerostomia.

Assessment of shoulder function after functional neck dissection and selective neck dissection (Levels I, II, III) in patients with carcinoma of tongue: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare shoulder function with respect to pain and disability in patients who have undergone nerve sparing neck dissection i.e. selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for carcinoma tongue on a follow up of minimum six months.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients were selected for this study. 50 patients who had undergone selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and 50 who underwent functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue from January 2005 to January 2007 were asked to participate in this study. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess pain and disability. Pain and disability scores were then compared between the two nerve sparing dissections.

RESULTS

100% of the patients in Selective Neck Dissection (SND) (levels I, II, III) group and in Functional Neck Dissection (FND) groups complained of pain. Though there is pain present in both the treatment groups, no significant difference in the pain values was found between FND and SND (levels I, II, III) in any of the pain parameters. Disability was present in both the treatment groups. However patients who have undergone FND had significantly higher severity of disability when compared to SND (levels I, II, III) especially during activities which involve shoulder abduction like dressing, doing heavy household work, hair wash and washing clothes/dishes (5.18, 5.22, 5.5, 4.88 in FND and 2.26, 4.08, 4.58, 2.2 in SND (levels I, II, III) respectively. Disability perceived during other activities like doing heavy household and facial care was 2.08 and 1.84 in both the treatment groups respectively.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION

Degree of shoulder morbidity is much higher in patients who have undergone FND as compared to SND (levels I, II, III) as a treatment modality for carcinoma tongue, even though both the treatment options are nerve preserving.

Impact of shoulder complaints after neck dissection on shoulder disability and quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To explore relationships between shoulder complaints after neck dissection, shoulder disability, and quality of life. To find clinical predictors for mid- to long-term shoulder disability.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Shoulder pain, shoulder mobility, and shoulder droop, as well as scores on shoulder disability questionnaire and RAND-36 (quality of life), were measured at baseline, discharge (T1), and 4 months postoperatively (T2) on 139 patients admitted for neck dissection to major head and neck centers in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

Shoulder mobility was significantly decreased at T1 and did not improve. Significant relationships between shoulder function, shoulder disability score, and RAND-36 domains were found. Two clusters of clinical symptoms could be identified as independent predictors for shoulder disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective deterioration in shoulder function after neck dissection is associated with perceived shoulder disability and related to physical functioning and bodily pain. Predictors for shoulder disability can be found.

Clinical results of rehabilitation for accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection

CONCLUSIONS

Occupational therapy significantly improves shoulder range of motion in patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection, but it has limited effects on the associated pain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of occupational therapy rehabilitation for patients with accessory nerve palsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The occupational therapy group involved 35 shoulders of 29 patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection; the control group included 10 shoulders of 9 patients who did not receive occupational therapy. All patients had a malignant tumor in the head or neck that necessitated radical neck dissection. We collected data pertaining to resting pain, motion pain, and the active and passive range of motion during shoulder flexion and abduction.

RESULTS

Occupational therapy did not adequately relieve resting or motion pain, but all patients achieved independence in activities of daily living and housekeeping activities. Although occupational therapy significantly improved shoulder elevation for all movements, shoulder elevation was significantly better for flexion than for active and passive abduction.

Function of the Clavicular Part of the Pectoralis Major Muscle After Transplantation of Its Sternocostal Part

BACKGROUND

Muscle-sparing transplantation of the sternocostal part of the pectoralis major muscle while preserving the clavicular part of the muscle may reduce donor-site morbidity, particularly in cases where dissection of the lymph nodes of the neck has been performed. The nerve supply and motor function of the clavicular part is alleged to be preserved when the sternocostal part is transposed through the deltopectoral groove. This study aims to objectify such preservation.

METHODS

Muscle activity of the remaining clavicular and abdominal muscle parts was determined electromyographically, dynamometrically, and goniometrically on 17 sides in 16 patients after head and neck reconstruction. Subjective assessment was obtained by use of a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

The electromyogram proved preservation of innervation of 16 of 17 clavicular parts. The electromyogram of the abdominal part showed no signs of denervation on 10 sides and normal, full interference patterns at maximum voluntary effort in all patients. Selective functional testing of the clavicular part revealed decreased force in horizontal adduction in 11 out of 15 patients. Still, the isolated effect of the pectoralis major transposition on shoulder function could not be objectified statistically. Subjective evaluation yielded that shoulder disability was more likely to have been correlated with loss of trapezius muscle function.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the innervation of the clavicular part, indeed, is preserved by transposition of the sternocostal part through the deltopectoral groove. This supports the validity, effectiveness, and functional acceptability of our muscle-sparing technique of partial pectoralis major transplantation.

Assessment of shoulder impairment after functional neck dissection: long term results

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective study, we attempted to use objective techniques to measure shoulder disability and evaluate patients who underwent functional neck dissection (FND) procedure. Patients were compared on the basis of preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) measurements, pain and stiffness domains. At the final visit, a Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) questionnaire was applied to all patients.

METHOD

Twenty-five patients treated with head and neck cancer who underwent bilateral FND simultaneously with the resection of primary tumor enrolled in this study from April 2001 to July 2004. Flexion, extension, abduction, internal and external rotations of the shoulder have been measured with electronic incliometer preoperatively, and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 18th months postoperatively. A questionnaire modified from neck dissection impairment index was applied to all patients to measure neck and shoulder disability at final visit. Pain and stiffness domains were also assessed preoperatively and at postoperative 18th month.

RESULTS

Measurements of abduction at the first and third months were found to be decreased in comparison with preoperative measurements. These differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The pain and stiffness scores of all patients at the final visit were significantly worse than the preoperative scores (p<0.005). At the final visit NDII of patients who underwent total laryngectomy were significantly worse than of the patients who underwent partial laryngectomy and glossectomy (p=0.002 and 0.043, respectively). All these results did not correlate with age, radiation therapy (RT), operation side, T stage.

CONCLUSION

FND is oncologicaly safe procedure and gives rise to less shoulder morbidity. Although, ROM improved after 18 months from surgery, pain and stiffness were found to be worse than preoperative values. The patients with total laryngectomy had lower NDII scores regarding to other patients. Therefore, shoulder disability can be attributed not only to neck dissection but also to primary surgery.

Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of chronic neck pain after neck dissection

BACKGROUND

Neck dissection surgery is often followed by chronic head and neck pain. To date optimal treatment of this type of pain is lacking. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome and headache. In a pilot study, we wanted to test the effectiveness of BTX-A for the treatment of chronic neck pain after neck dissection.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with chronic neck pain after neck dissection were included in this prospective, open study. Eighty to 320 units of BTX-A (Dysport) were injected into muscular trigger points. Outcome measures included chronic pain and shooting pain on the basis of visual analog scales and quality of life improvement (EORTC QLQ-C-30; EORTC QLQ-H and N35) before and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Patients showed a significant reduction in chronic pain (4.5 before to 3.3 after treatment, p =,005) and in shooting pain (6.1 before to 4.7 after treatment, p =.005). There was a trend toward improvement in global quality of life (QLQ-C30, p =.097) and an increase on the functional scale "pain" (QLQ-H and N35, p =.071).

CONCLUSIONS

BTX-A treatment of subjects with chronic neck pain after neck dissection resulted in a fast and significant reduction of pain. A significant improvement in quality of life may be expected in a longer time course after treatment.

Morbidity of the neck after head and neck cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Studies on morbidity of the neck after head and neck cancer therapy are scarcely described.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery, including neck dissection, with and without radiation therapy at least 1 year before the study were asked to participate. We assessed neck pain, loss of sensation, range of motion of the cervical spine, and shoulder pain.

RESULTS

Of the 220 patients who were invited, 153 (70%) participated in the study. Neck pain was present in 33% of the patients (n = 51), and shoulder pain was present in 37% of the patients (n = 57). Neuropathic pain of the neck was present in 32% (n = 49); myofascial pain, in 46% (n = 70); and joint pain, in 24% (n = 37). Loss of sensation of the neck was present in 65% (n = 99) and was related to type of neck dissection and radiation therapy. Range of motion of the neck was significantly decreased because of the neck dissection and/or radiation therapy in lateral flexion away from the operated side.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrences of morbidity of the neck after cancer therapy were considerable and consisted of neck pain, loss of sensation, and decreased range of motion.

Shoulder complaints after neck dissection; is the spinal accessory nerve involved?

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relation between shoulder morbidity (pain and range of motion), and the function of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. Identifying dysfunction of the nerve gives insight in the mechanisms of post-operative shoulder complaints. In total 112 patients after neck dissection (73 males/39 females), mean (SD) age 61 (13) years, participated in the study. The mean duration of follow up was 3 (2) years. Five patients had radical, 43 modified radical, 48 supraomohyoid, and 16 posterolateral neck dissection. Thirty-nine complained of shoulder pain of whom 20 (51%) had dysfunction of the spinal accessory nerve, and 19 (49%) did not. In total 29 patients (26%) had dysfunction of the spinal accessory nerve of whom 20 (69%) had shoulder pain. Shoulder pain was significantly related to dysfunction of the nerve (P < 0.001). Twenty-three patients had a difference in active range of motion in shoulder abduction of > or =40 degrees, of whom 22 (96%) had dysfunction of the nerve. A difference in active shoulder abduction of > or =40 degrees was significantly related to loss of function of the spinal accessory nerve (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Shoulder pain after neck dissection can only be attributed to dysfunction of the spinal accessory nerve in about 50%. If patients experience shoulder pain after neck dissection examination of the trapezius muscle and active bilateral abduction of the shoulder should be made to find out if the spinal accessory nerve is involved.

The 11th nerve syndrome in functional neck dissection

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the incidence of shoulder joint disability and evaluation of the role of a personal postoperative physical rehabilitative protocol therapy in reducing pain and shoulder dysfunction and improving the quality of life (QOL) of patients who have undergone functional neck dissection (FND) associated with total laryngectomy. SETTING, DESIGN, AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Sixty laryngectomees who had undergone FND were divided into two groups (A and B). Group A received physical therapy after surgery. Clinical evaluation was done according to the Constant modified questionnaire, including physical assessment of passive and active shoulder movement and information regarding patients' QOL. Bilateral quantitative electromyography (Q-EMG) of scapulohumeral muscles was carried out on all patients. Results were evaluated by Student t test and multivariate analysis to find out which variables were important in predicting pain and return to work.

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, the patients in group A had better results concerning passive forward elevation (P = 0), shoulder active motility (P = 0), pain (P <.001), working and recreational activity (P = 0), and score of Constant (P = 0) compared with the patients in group B. From a multivariate analysis of clinical parameters important in predicting pain, significant predictors (P <.01) were shown to be global shoulder active motility, active forward elevation, abduction, active external rotation, internal rotation hand to back, working and recreational activity, and score of Constant. Regarding return to work, a significant predictor (P <.01) was the score of Constant. Electromyography work-up showed deterioration in early postoperative periods and improvements in late postoperative periods.

CONCLUSION

The post-surgical variable clinical picture of shoulder disability is related not only to the accessory nerve injury, but also to the secondary glenohumeral stiffness resulting from the scapulohumeral girdle muscles weakness and postoperative forced immobility. Physical therapy aimed to early recover passive motion and to avoid the occurrence of joint fibrosis has been shown to have a real contributory role in decreasing shoulder complaints and improving the patients' QOL.

Occupational therapy for accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection

The subjects in this study were ten patients with accessory nerve palsy after radical neck dissection. All the primary diseases that accounted for radical neck dissection were malignant tumors located at the head or neck. Every patient received occupational therapy and underwent evaluations before and after the therapy. The data we collected included the existence of resting pain and motion pain, and the active and passive range of motion during shoulder flexion and abduction. The occupational therapy programs were not adequately effective for resting and motion pain, however, every patient gained independence for activities of daily living and housekeeping activities. The occupational therapy significantly improved the patient's shoulder elevation in all movements; although, the active abduction was always significantly poor compared with flexion. In the meantime, there were no significant differences between passive shoulder flexion and abduction at all times. We can therefore understand that the accessory nerve palsy especially affects active shoulder abduction induced by the trapezius paralysis. Occupational therapy is an effective treatment for the improvement of shoulder function, however, the occupational therapy has limited effectiveness for coping with the pain.

Incidence of shoulder pain after neck dissection: a clinical explorative study for risk factors

BACKGROUND

It is the purpose of this study to determine the incidence of shoulder pain and restricted range of motion of the shoulder after neck dissection, and to identify risk factors for the development of shoulder pain and restricted range of motion.

METHODS

Clinical patients who underwent a neck dissection completed a questionnaire assessing shoulder pain. The intensity of pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (100 mm). Range of motion of the shoulder was measured. Information about reconstructive surgery and side and type of neck dissection was retrieved from the medical records.

RESULTS

Of the patients (n = 177, mean age 60.3 years [SD, 11.9]) 70% experienced pain in the shoulder. Forward flexion and abduction of the operated side was severely reduced compared to the non-operated side, 21 degrees and 47 degrees, respectively. Non-selective neck dissection was a risk factor for the development of shoulder pain (9.6 mm) and a restricted shoulder abduction (55 degrees ). Reconstruction was risk factor for a restricted forward flexion of the shoulder (24.5 degrees ).

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder pain after neck dissection is clinically present in 70% of the patients. Non-selective neck dissection is a risk factor for shoulder pain and a restricted abduction. Reconstruction is a risk factor for a restricted forward flexion of the shoulder.

Iatrogenic painful neuropathic complications of surgery in cancer

It is estimated that at least one out of four patients with cancer complains of pain originating from nerve injury. Nerve injury may result from direct invasion/compression by tumour, or by remote effect of the cancer such as paraneoplastic polyneuropathy. In many cases, the nerve injury is caused by medical therapy, or surgical interventions. Pain generated by drugs or medical acts is called iatrogenic. A common iatrogenic neuralgia is chemotherapy induced painful polyneuropathy. This neuropathy typically affects mostly the small myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibres. Surgical and anaesthesiological interventions also frequently cause direct nerve stretch or section. Some interventions, particularly those requiring extended resection, have a higher incidence of painful sequelae. Limb and colon amputation, nerve dissection, mastectomy and thoracotomy are the most common interventions for cancer known to cause nerve injury. As pain clinicians, we focus attention on the painful consequences of surgical interventions because there is evidence that a more accurate surgical approach and possibly a prophylactic prevention of the neuralgia may reduce the painful sequelae of nerve injury.

Pain in the neck after neck dissection

BACKGROUND

Reports of disability after neck dissection have been directed toward shoulder dysfunction and pain. We could find no report addressing the issue of pain localized to the actual operative site. We have conducted a combined prospective and retrospective study of pain in patients undergoing neck dissection.

METHODS

Eighty-eight disease-free patients were evaluated in 3 groups for neck pain. One group was followed up prospectively for 1 to 8 months after surgery, and 2 retrospective groups were followed up for more than 2 years or for 6 months to 2 years. Pain was assessed by a body map and visual analog scale.

RESULTS

None of 31 patients followed up for more than 2 years reported neck pain. Four of 27 patients followed up for 6 to 24 months had pain, with a mean visual analog scale score of 3.7. Seventy percent of the prospective group of 30 patients had pain during the first postoperative week, and only 1 patient had pain persisting for more than 2 months. Shoulder pain and disability after radical neck dissection were encountered in all groups, comparable with the incidence reported in the literature. No postoperative neuromas were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pain localized to the operative site is an uncommon occurrence even after radical neck dissection. Chronic pain in the shoulder region may follow radical neck dissection, whereas modified neck dissection is usually a painless procedure.

Objective comparison of shoulder dysfunction after three neck dissection techniques

A prospective study with subjective evaluation of shoulder pain and objective evaluation of shoulder muscle strength by isokinetic testing and electromyographic and electroneurographic studies of spinal accessory nerve function was performed on patients who had undergone neck dissection procedures. Twenty-one patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled in this study. Three types of neck dissection were performed: 7 selective neck dissections, 9 modified radical neck dissections, and 5 radical neck dissections. All patients who underwent radical neck dissection had shoulder pain, and 80% of them had shoulder droop after the operation. In the patients who underwent selective neck dissection, the electromyographic findings of the spinal accessory nerve were relatively normal. Their shoulder strength was sometimes decreased at I month after operation, but it had returned to preoperative strength by the 6-month follow-up visit. These findings suggested that patients who underwent selective neck dissection had the least damage to spinal accessory nerve function and the least shoulder disability after neck dissection.

A prospective, longitudinal study of pain in head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the epidemiology of pain in head and neck cancer, the effects of curative treatment on this pain, and the impact that pain experience may have on patients' quality of life (QL).

METHOD

The prevalence and severity of pain was studied in 93 patients who were first seen with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer, were treated, and remained disease free at two years. QL assessment utilised the life-satisfaction scale and the General Health Questionnaire as specific measures. Pain was assessed by a linear analogue scale anchored by words and numbers.

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent had head and neck pain when first seen, whereas only 25% and 26% had such pain at 12 and 24 months. Approximately 8% of patients rated the pain as "severe" when first seen, whereas 3% had severe pain at 12 months and 4% at 2 years. The prevalence of shoulder and arm pain increased from 14% at diagnosis to 37% at a year and 26% at 24 months, but the percentage of patients with severe pain at any stage postoperatively was only 5% and 2%, respectively. Any pain (pain in either in the head and neck or shoulder and arm or both) at 2 years was strongly predicted by earlier posttreatment pain (at 3 months or at 12 months.) Shoulder and arm pain at 2 years was strongly correlated with surgical treatment of the neck, although no difference in pain experience was noted between those who had radical neck dissections and those who had more conservative procedures. There was no correlation between radiotherapy to the neck and subsequent shoulder and arm pain. Pain had an adverse effect on the general well-being and psychological distress of head and neck cancer patients who were free of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain is common among those presenting with curable head and neck cancer. Pain can be reduced by curative treatment but neck dissection may cause increased shoulder and arm pain. Ongoing pain is predictable and impacts adversely on patients QL.

Impact of neck dissection on quality of life

OBJECTIVES

For decades, the gold standard for treatment of cervical metastasis was radical neck dissection (RND). Current oncologic philosophy allows for treatment of appropriately staged neck disease with modified radical neck dissection (MRND) or selective neck dissection (SND). The purposes of this study were to determine the impact of various forms of neck dissection on patients' quality of life (QOL) and to evaluate the responsiveness of the University of Washington (UW) QOL shoulder domain.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective accumulation of QOL data from patients treated for head and neck cancer at UW.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients were identified from the UW QOL registry who had undergone neck dissection and had completed pretreatment and posttreatment QOL questionnaires at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Compared with pretreatment scores, the MRND and RND groups reported worse shoulder function at 6 and 12 months (P<.0005). The MRND group reported greater shoulder disability at 6 months compared with the SND group (P = .002), but by 12 months, there was no difference between the two groups. Shoulder function for the RND group was worse than the SND group at 6 and 12 months (P = .004). There was a trend toward decreased pain after treatment in the SND and MRND groups. There were no significant differences in subjective appearance, activity, recreation, chewing, swallowing, or speech in the three groups after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with findings of published functional studies, this study confirmed that the three forms of neck dissection affect patients' QOL differently. This study demonstrates that the UW QOL shoulder domain is a responsive instrument in assessing the effect of neck dissection on shoulder function.

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy following neck dissections

PURPOSE

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), which is a disorder that occurs after injury or surgery on the extremities, has not been reported as a complication of neck dissections until now. A group patients with head and neck cancer have been examined to determine the incidence of RSD in neck dissections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with head and neck cancer, who had undergone neck dissections together with the removal of the primary tumor, were evaluated for RSD on their routine controls.

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

The presentation of RSD in two patients who were treated with radical neck dissection is probably a result of sympathetic hyperactivity that is secondary to surgical trauma.

Reinnervation of the trapezius muscle after radical neck dissection

Based on the observation, that the caudal parts of the trapezius muscle after radical neck dissection with complete loss of the spinal accessory nerve, are still innervated to an individually varying degree, and on recent anatomical findings relating to this fact, a method for completely reinnervating the trapezius muscle, despite uncompromising radicality of the dissection, is introduced. This procedure consists of identifying and dislodging a subfascial branch of the deep cervical plexus running to the caudal parts of the trapezius muscle in the lateral cervical triangle and anastomosing it to the distal stump of the accessory nerve, using microsurgical techniques, thereby connecting it to the whole innervation system of the muscle. Clinical and electromyographical examinations showed very good recovery of all three portions of the muscle, 15 months after the procedure, in 46 of 52 patients (85%), although these patients were preselected by temporarily blocking the accessory nerve prior to operation, as possessing very little additional nerve supply.