Anticonvulsant efficacy of gabapentin and levetiracetam in phenytoin-resistant kindled rats

Development of SV2A Ligands for Epilepsy Treatment: A Review of Levetiracetam, Brivaracetam, and Padsevonil

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is primarily treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Although dozens of ASMs are available in the clinic, approximately 30% of epileptic patients have medically refractory seizures; other limitations in most traditional ASMs include poor tolerability and drug-drug interactions. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop alternative ASMs. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM that is well tolerated, has promising efficacy, and has little drug-drug interaction. Although it is widely accepted that LEV acts through a unique therapeutic target synaptic vesicle protein (SV) 2A, the molecular basis of its action remains unknown. Even so, the next-generation SV2A ligands against epilepsy based on the structure of LEV have achieved clinical success. This review highlights the research and development (R&D) process of LEV and its analogs, brivaracetam and padsevonil, to provide ideas and experience for the R&D of novel ASMs.

Current advances in rodent drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy models: Hints from laboratory studies

Anti-seizure drugs (ASDs) are the first choice for the treatment of epilepsy, but there is still one-third of patients with epilepsy (PWEs) who are resistant to two or more appropriately chosen ASDs, named drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), a common type of epilepsy usually associated with hippocampal sclerosis (HS), shares the highest proportion of drug resistance (approximately 70%). In view of the key role of the temporal lobe in memory, emotion, and other physiological functions, patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (DR-TLE) are often accompanied by serious complications, and surgical procedures also yield extra considerations. The exact mechanisms for the genesis of DR-TLE remain unillustrated, which makes it hard to manage patients with DR-TLE in clinical practice. Animal models of DR-TLE play an irreplaceable role in both understanding the mechanism and searching for new therapeutic strategies or drugs. In this review article, we systematically summarized different types of current DR-TLE models, and then recent advances in mechanism investigations obtained in these models were presented, especially with the development of advanced experimental techniques and tools. We are deeply encouraged that novel strategies show great therapeutic potential in those DR-TLE models. Based on the big steps reached from the bench, a new light has been shed on the precise management of DR-TLE.

The Expression of ZnT3 and GFAP Is Potentiated in the Hippocampus of Drug-Resistant Epileptic Rats Induced by Amygdala Kindling

OBJECTIVE

The first-line treatment for epilepsy, a chronic neurological disorder characterized by spontaneous seizures, includes the application of anticonvulsant drug therapy. Only one-third of patients are incapable of complete controlling of their seizures after the administration of ≥2 pharmaceuticals. Here, we aimed to observe the ultrastructure changes and the expression of ZnT3 and GFAP in the hippocampus of drug-resistant epileptic rats.

METHODS

A total of 50 healthy adult male SD rats were used to generate the model ofepilepsy by amygdala kindling. After the rats were successfully kindled, pharmacoresistant epileptic (PRE) rats were selected according to their response to phenobarbital and phenytoin. The ultrastructure as well as the expression of zinc transporter 3 (ZnT3, a member of a growing family of mammalian zinc transporters) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were compared among PRE, pharmacosensitive epileptic (PRE), and normal (NRC) rats.

RESULTS

The PRE rats displayed severe synapses, neuronal degeneration, and necrosis. Moreover, the expression of ZnT3 and GFAP was significantly increased in both PRE and PSE rats; compared with NRC rats, the promotion of this expression was more pronounced in the PRE rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, obvious synapses, neuronal degeneration, necrosis, mossy fiber sprouting, and astrogliosis were found in the drug-resistant epileptic rat model induced by amygdala kindling.

Optogenetically-Induced Population Discharge Threshold as a Sensitive Measure of Network Excitability

Network excitability is governed by synaptic efficacy, intrinsic excitability, and the circuitry in which these factors are expressed. The complex interplay between these factors determines how circuits function and, at the extreme, their susceptibility to seizure. We have developed a sensitive, quantitative estimate of network excitability in freely behaving mice using a novel optogenetic intensity-response procedure. Synchronous activation of deep sublayer CA1 pyramidal cells produces abnormal network-wide epileptiform population discharges (PDs) that are nearly indistinguishable from spontaneously-occurring interictal spikes (IISs). By systematically varying light intensity, and therefore the magnitude of the optogenetically-mediated current, we generated intensity-response curves using the probability of PD as the dependent variable. Manipulations known to increase excitability, such as sub-convulsive doses (20 mg/kg) of the chemoconvulsant pentylenetetrazol (PTZ), produced a leftward shift in the curve compared to baseline. The anti-epileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV; 40 mk/kg), in combination with PTZ, produced a rightward shift. Optogenetically-induced PD threshold (oPDT) baselines were stable over time, suggesting the metric is appropriate for within-subject experimental designs with multiple pharmacological manipulations.

Evaluation of antiseizure drug efficacy and tolerability in the rat lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindling model

OBJECTIVE

The lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindling model uses repeated administration of a low dose of lamotrigine during the kindling process to produce resistance to lamotrigine, which also extends to some other antiseizure drugs (ASDs). This model of pharmacoresistant epilepsy has been incorporated into the testing scheme utilized by the Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program (ETSP). Although some ASDs have been evaluated in this model, a comprehensive evaluation of ASD prototypes has not been reported.

METHODS

Following depth electrode implantation and recovery, rats were exposed to lamotrigine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to each stimulation during the kindling development process (~3 weeks). A test dose of lamotrigine was used to confirm that fully kindled rats were lamotrigine-resistant. Efficacy (unambiguous protection against electrically elicited convulsive seizures) was defined as a Racine score < 3 in the absence of overt compound-induced side effects. Various ASDs, comprising several mechanistic classes, were administered to fully kindled, lamotrigine-resistant rats. Where possible, multiple doses of each drug were administered in order to obtain median effective dose (ED50) values.

RESULTS

Five sodium channel blockers tested (eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, lamotrigine, phenytoin, and rufinamide) were either not efficacious or effective only at doses that were not well-tolerated in this model. In contrast, compounds targeting either GABA receptors (clobazam, clonazepam, phenobarbital) or GABA-uptake proteins (tiagabine) produced dose-dependent efficacy against convulsive seizures. Compounds acting to modulate Ca2+ channels show differential activity: Ethosuximide was not effective, whereas gabapentin was moderately efficacious. Ezogabine and valproate were also highly effective, whereas topiramate and levetiracetam were not effective at the doses tested.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results strengthen the conclusion that the lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindling model demonstrates pharmacoresistance to certain ASDs, including, but not limited to, sodium channel blockers, and supports the utility of the model for helping to identify compounds with potential efficacy against pharmacoresistant seizures.

Validated animal models for antiseizure drug (ASD) discovery: Advantages and potential pitfalls in ASD screening

Since 1993, over 20 new anti-seizure drugs (ASDs) have been identified in well-established animal seizure and epilepsy models and subsequently demonstrated to be clinically effective in double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with focal onset seizures. All clinically-available ASDs on the market today are effective in at least one of only three preclinical seizure and epilepsy models: the acute maximal electroshock (MES), the acute subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol (scPTZ) test, or the kindled rodent with chronic evoked seizures. Thus, it reasons that preclinical ASD discovery does not need significant revision to successfully identify ASDs for the symptomatic treatment of epilepsy. Unfortunately, a significant need still persists for more efficacious and better tolerated ASDs. This is particularly true for those patients whose seizures remain drug resistant. This review will focus on the continued utility of the acute MES and scPTZ tests, as well as the kindled rodent for current and future ASD discovery. These are the only "clinically validated" rodent models to date and been heavily used in the search for novel and more efficacious ASDs. This is to say that promising ASDs have been brought to the clinic on the basis of efficacy in these particular seizure and epilepsy models alone. This review also discusses some of the inherent advantages and limitations of these models relative to existing and emerging preclinical models. It then offers insight into future efforts to develop a preclinical model that will advance a truly transformative therapy for the symptomatic treatment of difficult to treat focal onset epilepsy. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'New Epilepsy Therapies for the 21st Century - From Antiseizure Drugs to Prevention, Modification and Cure of Epilepsy'.

Influence of hippocampal low-frequency stimulation on GABAA R α1, ICER and BNDF expression level in brain tissues of amygdala-kindled drug-resistant temporal lobe epileptic rats

This study investigated the therapeutic effect of hippocampal low-frequency stimulation (Hip-LFS) and its influence on the type A γ-aminobutyric acid receptor α1 subunit (GABA_A R α1 subunit), inducible cAMP early repressor (ICER) and brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BNDF). The model of epilepsy was induced by chronic electrical stimulation in amygdala. Drug-resistant and drug-sensitive epileptic rats were selected by testing their seizure response to phenytoin and phenobarbital. The changes of GABA_A R α1 subunit, ICER and BDNF expression were detected via immunohistochemistry and western blot. The expression levels of ICER and BDNF were increased remarkably but the GABA_A R α1 subunit decreased significantly in the drug-resistant epileptic rats. However, the expression levels of ICER, BDNF were decreased and the expression of the GABA_A R α1 subunit increased significantly in the drug-resistant epileptic rats after two weeks of Hip-LFS. Meanwhile, the seizure degree was reduced and the electroencephalograms were improved. The present study demonstrated thatincreased ICER and BDNF might be associated with the development of drug-resistance. The effect of Hip-LFS in the treatment of drug-resistant epileptic rats might be associated with increasing the levels of the ICER and the BDNF.

In vitro and in vivo experimental models employed in the discovery and development of antiepileptic drugs for pharmacoresistant epilepsy

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic, recurrent and progressive neurological diseases. In spite of the large number of antiepileptic drugs currently available for the suppression of seizures, about one-third of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy, even when they are administered the most appropriate treatment available. Thus, nonclinical models can be valuable tools for the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the development of pharmacoresistance and also for the development of new therapeutic agents that may be promising therapeutic approaches for this unmet medical need. Up today, several epilepsy and seizure models have been developed, exhibiting similar physiopathological features of human drug-resistant epilepsy; moreover, pharmacological response to antiepileptic drugs clinically available tends to be similar in animal models and humans. Therefore, they should be more intensively used in the preclinical discovery and development of new candidates to antiepileptic drugs. Although useful, in vitro models cannot completely replicate the complexity of a living being and their potential for a systematic use in antiepileptic drug screening is limited. The whole-animal models are the most commonly employed and they can be classified as per se drug-resistant due to an inherent poor drug response or be based on the selection of subgroups of epileptic animals that respond or not to a specific antiepileptic drug. Although more expensive and time-consuming, the latter are chronic models of epilepsy that better exhibit the disease-associated alterations found in human epilepsy. Several antiepileptic drugs in development or already marketed have been already tested and shown to be effective in these models of drug-resistant epilepsy, constituting a new hope for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. This review will provide epilepsy researchers with detailed information on the in vitro and in vivo nonclinical models of interest in drug-resistant epilepsy, which may enable a refined selection of most relevant models for understanding the mechanisms of the disease and developing novel antiepileptic drugs.

Interaction of Approved Drugs with Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A

Levetiracetam (LEV) and its recently approved derivative brivaracetam are anti-epileptic drugs with a unique mechanism of action. The synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) was previously identified as their main target. In the current study, we tested a collection of 500 approved drugs for interaction with the human SV2A protein expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Competition binding studies were performed using cell lysates with high SV2A expression and [³ H]brivaracetam as a radioligand. A hit rate of 3% was obtained, defined as compounds that inhibited radioligand binding by more than 90% at a screening concentration of 20 μM. Subsequent concentration-inhibition curves revealed the antihistaminic prodrug loratadine (K_i  = 1.16 μM) and the antimalarial drug quinine (K_i  = 2.03 μM) to be the most potent SV2A protein ligands of the investigated drug library. Both compounds were similarly potent as LEV (K_i  = 1.74 μM), providing structurally novel scaffolds for SV2A ligands. A pharmacophore model was established, which indicated steric and electronic conformities of brivaracetam with the new SV2A ligands, and preliminary structure-activity relationships were determined. The anti-convulsive effects of the natural product quinine may - at least in part - be explained by interaction with SV2A. Loratadine and quinine represent new lead structures for anti-epileptic drug development.

Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Ligands in the Treatment of Epilepsy and Beyond

The synaptic vesicle glycoprotein SV2A belongs to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) of transporters and is an integral constituent of synaptic vesicle membranes. SV2A has been demonstrated to be involved in vesicle trafficking and exocytosis, processes crucial for neurotransmission. The anti-seizure drug levetiracetam was the first ligand to target SV2A and displays a broad spectrum of anti-seizure activity in various preclinical models. Several lines of preclinical and clinical evidence, including genetics and protein expression changes, support an important role of SV2A in epilepsy pathophysiology. While the functional consequences of SV2A ligand binding are not fully elucidated, studies suggest that subsequent SV2A conformational changes may contribute to seizure protection. Conversely, the recently discovered negative SV2A modulators, such as UCB0255, counteract the anti-seizure effect of levetiracetam and display procognitive properties in preclinical models. More broadly, dysfunction of SV2A may also be involved in Alzheimer's disease and other types of cognitive impairment, suggesting potential novel therapies for levetiracetam and its congeners. Furthermore, emerging data indicate that there may be important roles for two other SV2 isoforms (SV2B and SV2C) in the pathogenesis of epilepsy, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases. Utilization of recently developed SV2A positron emission tomography ligands will strengthen and reinforce the pharmacological evidence that SV2A is a druggable target, and will provide a better understanding of its role in epilepsy and other neurological diseases, aiding in further defining the full therapeutic potential of SV2A modulation.

Synaptic vesicle protein2A decreases in amygdaloid-kindling pharmcoresistant epileptic rats

Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) involvement has been reported in the animal models of epilepsy and in human intractable epilepsy. The difference between pharmacosensitive epilepsy and pharmacoresistant epilepsy remains poorly understood. The present study aimed to observe the hippocampus SV2A protein expression in amygdale-kindling pharmacoresistant epileptic rats. The pharmacosensitive epileptic rats served as control. Amygdaloid-kindling model of epilepsy was established in 100 healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. The kindled rat model of epilepsy was used to select pharmacoresistance by testing their seizure response to phenytoin and phenobarbital. The selected pharmacoresistant rats were assigned to a pharmacoresistant epileptic group (PRE group). Another 12 pharmacosensitive epileptic rats (PSE group) served as control. Immunohistochemistry, real-time PCR and Western blotting were used to determine SV2A expression in the hippocampus tissue samples from both the PRE and the PSE rats. Immunohistochemistry staining showed that SV2A was mainly accumulated in the cytoplasm of the neurons, as well as along their dendrites throughout all subfields of the hippocampus. Immunoreactive staining level of SV2A-positive cells was 0.483 ± 0.304 in the PRE group and 0.866 ± 0.090 in the PSE group (P < 0.05). Real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that 2(-ΔΔCt) value of SV2A mRNA was 0.30 ± 0.43 in the PRE group and 0.76 ± 0.18 in the PSE group (P < 0.05). Western blotting analysis obtained the similar findings (0.27 ± 0.21 versus 1.12 ± 0.21, P < 0.05). PRE rats displayed a significant decrease of SV2A in the brain. SV2A may be associated with the pathogenesis of intractable epilepsy of the amygdaloid-kindling rats.

R-phenibut binds to the α2-δ subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels and exerts gabapentin-like anti-nociceptive effects

Phenibut is clinically used anxiolytic, mood elevator and nootropic drug. R-phenibut is responsible for the pharmacological activity of racemic phenibut, and this activity correlates with its binding affinity for GABAB receptors. In contrast, S-phenibut does not bind to GABAB receptors. In this study, we assessed the binding affinities of R-phenibut, S-phenibut, baclofen and gabapentin (GBP) for the α2-δ subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channel (VDCC) using a subunit-selective ligand, radiolabelled GBP. Binding experiments using rat brain membrane preparations revealed that the equilibrium dissociation constants (Kis) for R-phenibut, S-phenibut, baclofen and GBP were 23, 39, 156 and 0.05μM, respectively. In the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizure test, we found that at doses up to 100mg/kg, R-phenibut did not affect PTZ-induced seizures. The anti-nociceptive effects of R-phenibut were assessed using the formalin-induced paw-licking test and the chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve model. Pre-treatment with R-phenibut dose-dependently decreased the nociceptive response during both phases of the test. The anti-nociceptive effects of R-phenibut in the formalin-induced paw-licking test were not blocked by the GABAB receptor-selective antagonist CGP35348. In addition, treatment with R- and S-phenibut alleviated the mechanical and thermal allodynia induced by CCI of the sciatic nerve. Our data suggest that the binding affinity of R-phenibut for the α2-δ subunit of the VDCC is 4 times higher than its affinity for the GABAB receptor. The anti-nociceptive effects of R-phenibut observed in the tests of formalin-induced paw licking and CCI of the sciatic nerve were associated with its effect on the α2-δ subunit of the VDCC rather than with its effects on GABAB receptors. In conclusion, our results provide experimental evidence for GBP-like, anti-nociceptive properties of R-phenibut, which might be used clinically to treat neuropathic pain disorders.

Advances on genetic rat models of epilepsy

Considering the suitability of laboratory rats in epilepsy research, we and other groups have been developing genetic models of epilepsy in this species. After epileptic rats or seizure-susceptible rats were sporadically found in outbred stocks, the epileptic traits were usually genetically-fixed by selective breeding. So far, the absence seizure models GAERS and WAG/Rij, audiogenic seizure models GEPR-3 and GEPR-9, generalized tonic-clonic seizure models IER, NER and WER, and Canavan-disease related epileptic models TRM and SER have been established. Dissection of the genetic bases including causative genes in these epileptic rat models would be a significant step toward understanding epileptogenesis. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis provides a systematic approach which allowed us to develop two novel epileptic rat models: heat-induced seizure susceptible (Hiss) rats with an Scn1a missense mutation and autosomal dominant lateral temporal epilepsy (ADLTE) model rats with an Lgi1 missense mutation. In addition, we have established episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1) model rats with a Kcna1 missense mutation derived from the ENU-induced rat mutant stock, and identified a Cacna1a missense mutation in a N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced mutant rat strain GRY, resulting in the discovery of episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) model rats. Thus, epileptic rat models have been established on the two paths: ‘phenotype to gene’ and ‘gene to phenotype’. In the near future, development of novel epileptic rat models will be extensively promoted by the use of sophisticated genome editing technologies.

Levetiracetam use in the critical care setting

Intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) is currently approved as an alternative or replacement therapy for patients unable to take the oral form of this antiepileptic drug (AED). The oral form has Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indications for adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial onset epilepsy ages 1 month or more, myoclonic seizures associated with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy starting with the age of 12 and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in people 6 years and older. Since the initial introduction, oral and IV LEV has been evaluated in various studies conducted in the critical care setting for the treatment of status epilepticus, stroke-related seizures, seizures following subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage, post-traumatic seizures, tumor-related seizures, and seizures in critically ill patients. Additionally, studies evaluating rapid infusion of IV LEV and therapeutic monitoring of serum LEV levels in different patient populations have been performed. In this review we present the current state of knowledge on LEV use in the critical care setting focusing on the IV uses and discuss future research needs.

Issues related to development of new antiseizure treatments

This report represents a summary of the discussions led by the antiseizure treatment working group of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE)/American Epilepsy Society (AES) Working Groups joint meeting in London (London Meeting). We review here what is currently known about the pharmacologic characteristics of current models of refractory seizures, both for adult and pediatric epilepsy. In addition, we address how the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)-funded Anticonvulsant Screening Program (ASP) is evolving to incorporate appropriate animal models in the search for molecules that might be sufficiently novel to warrant further pharmacologic development. We also briefly address what we believe is necessary, going forward, to achieve the goal of stopping seizures in all patients, with a call to arms for funding agencies, the pharmaceutical industry, and basic researchers.

Carbamazepine, but not valproate, displays pharmacoresistance in lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindled rats

The voltage gated sodium channel (VGSC) blocker lamotrigine (LTG), when administered during kindling acquisition, leads to the development of resistance to LTG. The present study aimed to assess whether LTG-resistant amygdala-kindled rats display subsequent resistance to the VGSC blocker carbamazepine (CBZ) and the broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) sodium valproate (VPA). Two groups of male Sprague Dawley rats received either 0.5% methylcellulose (MC) or LTG (5mg/kg, i.p.) 1h before each amygdala kindling stimulation. Treatments were stopped once both the groups were fully kindled. Two days later, both groups were challenged with a higher dose of LTG (15mg/kg, i.p.) to verify LTG-resistance in the experimental group (i.e., LTG-pretreated rats). The efficacy of CBZ and VPA was then evaluated in both groups. A higher dose of LTG blocked fully kindled seizures in the vehicle-treated rats but not seizures in the LTG-treated group. The mean seizure score, of the control group (1.2±0.3) was significantly lower (P<.05) than that of the LTG-treated population (3.5±0.7; n=8). A lower percent of the population in the control group was observed to display a generalized stage 4-5 seizure compared to the experimental group (i.e., those that received LTG during kindling acquisition) (28.5% vs. 62%, respectively). Interestingly, CBZ (10, 20, and 40mg/kg) displayed a dose-dependent anticonvulsant effect in the vehicle-kindled group, but was less effective in LTG-treated animals. In contrast, VPA (300mg/kg) effectively blocked the behavioral seizure and decreased the afterdischarge duration (ADD) in both vehicle and LTG groups. These findings suggest that the LTG-resistant, amygdala-kindled rat may represent a novel model of pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Effects of low-frequency hippocampal stimulation on gamma-amino butyric acid type B receptor expression in pharmacoresistant amygdaloid kindling epileptic rats

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of low-frequency hippocampal stimulation on gamma-amino butyric acid type B (GABA-B) receptor expression in hippocampus pharmacoresistant epileptic rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen pharmacoresistant epileptic rats were selected by testing their seizure response to phenytoin and phenobarbital, and they were randomly divided into a pharmacoresistant control group (PRC group, eight rats) and a pharmacoresistant stimulation group (PRS group, eight rats). Another 16 pharmacosensitive epileptic rats were served as control, also divided randomly into a pharmacosensitive control group (PSC group) and a pharmacosensitive stimulation group (PSS group). A stimulation electrode was implanted into the rats' hippocampus in the four groups. Low-frequency hippocampal stimulation was administered twice per day for two weeks. Following these weeks of stimulation, GABA-B receptor-positive neurons were counted and the gray values of GABA-B receptor expression in the rats' hippocampal tissues were measured.

RESULTS

The amygdale stimulus-induced epileptic seizures were decreased significantly in the PRS group compared with the PRC group. The parameters of the amygdale after discharge also were improved after hippocampal stimulation. Simultaneously, the GABA-B receptor-positive neurons increased and the GABA-B expression gray values decreased markedly in the PRS group compared with the PRC group. The same phenomenon also was observed between the PSS group and the PSC group. However, no significant difference was found in the GABA-B receptor-positive neurons and the gray values of GABA-B between the PRS group and the PSC group.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-frequency hippocampal stimulation may inhibit the amygdale stimulus-induced epileptic seizures and the after discharges. The antiepileptic effects of the hippocampal stimulation may be achieved partly by increasing the expression of the GABA-B receptor.

Mode-dependent effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the anterior thalamic nucleus on amygdala-kindled seizures in rats

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging treatment of epilepsy. Anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is considered to be an attractive target due to its close connection to the limbic structures and wide regions of neocortex. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of high frequency stimulation (HFS) targeting the ANT on amygdala-kindled seizures in Wistar rats in two different stimulation modes i.e. pre-treatment and post-treatment stimulations, mimicking the scheduled and responsive stimulations in clinical use respectively. When fully-kindled seizures were achieved by daily amygdala kindling (1 s train of 1 ms pulses at 60 Hz), HFS (15 min train of 100 μs pulses at 150 Hz and 450-800 μA) was applied in two modes for 10 days. Bilateral post-treatment with HFS reduced the incidence of generalized seizures and the mean behavioral seizure stage and shortened average afterdischarge duration (ADD) and generalized seizure duration (GSD), while bilateral pre-treatment with HFS resulted in a similar but much weaker inhibition of seizures. On the other hand, we also found the two stimulation modes both increased the afterdischarge threshold (ADT) and the differences of current intensity between ADT and generalized seizure threshold (GST) i.e. Δ(GST-ADT). However, Δ(GST-ADT) increased by at least 20 μA in bilateral post-treatment group, while less in bilateral pre-treatment group. Additionally, unilateral post-treatment with HFS failed to inhibit seizures. Our data show that anti-epileptic effect of bilateral post-treatment with HFS of ANT is much stronger than that of bilateral pre-treatment HFS, indicating bilateral responsive stimulation might be more appropriate for clinical anti-epileptic treatment of ANT HFS.

Levetiracetam: a review of its use in epilepsy

Levetiracetam (Keppra®, E Keppra®) is an established second-generation antiepileptic drug (AED). Worldwide, levetiracetam is most commonly approved as adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization; other approved indications include monotherapy treatment of partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization, and adjunctive treatment of myoclonic seizures associated with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Levetiracetam has a novel structure and unique mechanisms of action. Unlike other AEDs, the mechanisms of action of levetiracetam appear to involve neuronal binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A, inhibiting calcium release from intraneuronal stores, opposing the activity of negative modulators of GABA- and glycin-gated currents and inhibiting excessive synchronized activity between neurons. In addition, levetiracetam inhibits N-type calcium channels. Levetiracetam is associated with rapid and complete absorption, high oral bioavailability, minimal metabolism that consists of hydrolysis of the acetamide group, and primarily renal elimination. It lacks cytochrome P450 isoenzyme-inducing potential and is not associated with clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, including other AEDs. The efficacy of oral immediate-release levetiracetam in controlling seizures has been established in numerous randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trials in patients with epilepsy. Adjunctive levetiracetam reduced the frequency of seizures in paediatric and adult patients with refractory partial onset seizures to a significantly greater extent than placebo. Monotherapy with levetiracetam was noninferior to that with carbamazepine controlled release in controlling seizures in patients with newly diagnosed partial onset seizures. Levetiracetam also provided seizure control relative to placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy with myoclonic seizures or GTC seizures. In addition, patients receiving oral levetiracetam showed improvements in measures of health-related quality of life relative to those receiving placebo. Although treatment-emergent adverse events were commonly reported in the clinical trials of levetiracetam, the overall proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was broadly similar in the levetiracetam and placebo treatment groups, with most events being mild to moderate in severity. Levetiracetam is not associated with cognitive impairment or drug-induced weight gain, but has been associated with behavioural adverse effects in some patients.

Is levetiracetam different from other antiepileptic drugs? Levetiracetam and its cellular mechanism of action in epilepsy revisited

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug that is clinically effective in generalized and partial epilepsy syndromes as sole or add-on medication. Nevertheless, its underlying mechanism of action is poorly understood. It has a unique preclinical profile; unlike other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it modulates seizure-activity in animal models of chronic epilepsy with no effect in most animal models of acute seizures. Yet it is effective in acute in-vitro 'seizure' models. A possible explanation for these dichotomous findings is that LEV has different mechanisms of actions, whether given acutely or chronically and in 'epileptic' and control tissue. Here we review the general mechanism of action of AEDs, give an updated and critical overview about the experimental findings of LEV's cellular targets (in particular the synaptic vesicular protein SV2A) and ask whether LEV represents a new class of AED.

What makes epilepsy drug refractory?

About 20-40% of patients with epilepsy will be refractory to medical treatment with antiepileptic drugs. It is unclear whether patients are already drug-resistant at the time of their initial presentation, or whether they become so over the course of their illness. Identifying predictors for drug-refractory epilepsy may be important for directing epilepsy patients to an effective nonpharmacological treatment, such as surgery or the vagus nerve stimulator, in a timely manner. In addition, understanding the factors that lead to the drug-refractory state may facilitate the development of new therapies that are effective in the resistant subgroup. This paper identifies various predictors that have been associated with drug-refractory epilepsy, discusses the evidence behind each factor and recommends strategies for clarifying predictors of refractoriness.

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded comparative trial of intravenous levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Anti-epileptic drugs are commonly used for seizure prophylaxis after neurological injury. We performed a study comparing intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) to IV phenytoin (PHT) for seizure prophylaxis after neurological injury.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blinded comparative trial of LEV versus PHT (2:1 ratio) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (NCT00618436) patients received IV load with either LEV or fosphenytoin followed by standard IV doses of LEV or PHT. Doses were adjusted to maintain therapeutic serum PHT concentrations or if patients had seizures. Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring was performed for the initial 72 h; outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were randomized (LEV = 34; PHT = 18); 89% with sTBI. When controlling for baseline severity, LEV patients experienced better long-term outcomes than those on PHT; the Disability Rating Scale score was lower at 3 months (P = 0.042) and the Glasgow Outcomes Scale score was higher at 6 months (P = 0.039). There were no differences between groups in seizure occurrence during cEEG (LEV 5/34 vs. PHT 3/18; P = 1.0) or at 6 months (LEV 1/20 vs. PHT 0/14; P = 1.0), mortality (LEV 14/34 vs. PHT 4/18; P = 0.227). There were no differences in side effects between groups (all P > 0.15) except for a lower frequency of worsened neurological status (P = 0.024), and gastrointestinal problems (P = 0.043) in LEV-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of LEV versus PHT for seizure prevention in the NSICU showed improved long-term outcomes of LEV-treated patients vis-à-vis PHT-treated patients. LEV appears to be an alternative to PHT for seizure prophylaxis in this setting.

New treatment options in status epilepticus: a critical review on intravenous levetiracetam

The effectiveness of Levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of focal and generalised epilepsies is well established. LEV has a wide spectrum of action, good tolerability and a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. An injectable formulation has been released as an intravenous (IV) infusion in 2006 for patients with epilepsy when oral administration is temporarily not feasible. Bioequivalence to the oral preparation has been demonstrated with good tolerability and safety enabling a smooth transition from oral to parenteral formulation and vice versa. Although IV LEV is not licensed for treatment of status epilepticus (SE), open-label experience in retrospective case series is accumulating. Until now (August 2008) 156 patients who were treated with IV LEV for various forms of SE have been reported with an overall success rate of 65.4%. The most often used initial dose was 2000-3000 mg over 15 minutes. Adverse events were reported in 7.1%, and were mild and transient. Although IV LEV is an interesting alternative for the treatment of SE due to the lack of centrally depressive effects and low potential of drug interactions, one has to be aware of the nonrandomised retrospective study design, the heterogenous patient population and treatment protocols, and the publication bias inherent in these type of studies. Only a large randomised controlled trial with an adequate comparator will reveal the efficacy and effectiveness of this promising new IV formulation.

New molecular targets for antiepileptic drugs: alpha(2)delta, SV2A, and K(v)7/KCNQ/M potassium channels

Many currently prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) act via voltage-gated sodium channels, through effects on gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated inhibition, or via voltage-gated calcium channels. Some newer AEDs do not act via these traditional mechanisms. The molecular targets for several of these nontraditional AEDs have been defined using cellular electrophysiology and molecular approaches. Here, we describe three of these targets: alpha(2)delta, auxiliary subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels through which the gabapentinoids gabapentin and pregabalin exert their anticonvulsant and analgesic actions; SV2A, a ubiquitous synaptic vesicle glycoprotein that may prepare vesicles for fusion and serves as the target for levetiracetam and its analog brivaracetam (which is currently in late-stage clinical development); and K(v)7/KCNQ/M potassium channels that mediate the M-current, which acts a brake on repetitive firing and burst generation and serves as the target for the investigational AEDs retigabine and ICA-105665. Functionally, all of the new targets modulate neurotransmitter output at synapses, focusing attention on presynaptic terminals as critical sites of action for AEDs.

Preliminary explorations of the role of mitochondrial proteins in refractory epilepsy: some findings from comparative proteomics

Approximately 20-30% of patients with epilepsy continue to have seizures despite carefully monitored treatment with antiepileptic drugs. The mechanisms that underlie why some patients are responsive and others prove resistant to antiepileptic drugs are poorly understood. Increasing evidence supports a role for altered mitochondrial function in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. To gain greater molecular insight in the pathogenesis of intractable epilepsy, we undertook a global analysis of protein expressions in a pharmacoresistant epileptic model selected by phenytoin in electrical amygdala-kindled rats by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF-TOF). We identified five increased proteins and 14 decreased proteins including voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) with a 2.82-fold increased level (P < 0.05) and voltage-dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2) with a 3.97-fold decreased level (P < 0.05) in hippocampus of pharmacoresistant rats. The increased VDAC1 and decreased VDAC2 were confirmed by Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Vascular mitochondria and apoptosis neurons were observed through electron microscopy. Energy contents, the adenine nucleotides, were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The correlation analyses were carried out between VDAC and the energy charge. These findings indicate that the increase of VDAC1 and the decrease of VDAC2 play an important role during the process and provide new molecular evidence in understanding mechanism of refractory epilepsy.

Long-term use of Levetiracetam in patients with severe childhood-onset epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of Levetiracetam (LEV) in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy with a special interest in the long-term retention rate.

METHOD

One hundred and twenty-nine patients (83 male, 46 female; mean age 10.6 years/range: 6 months-39 years 9 months) were included in a prospective, open-label, add-on trial of LEV for up to 3 years. All patients had severe forms of epilepsy starting before the age of 10 often accompanied by mental retardation. Primary outcome measures were changes in seizure frequency after 6 months on the medication with LEV, with initial responders (>50% seizure reduction). Further objective was the retention rate of LEV therapy after 3 years defined as percentage of patients still taking LEV.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (27.1%) were initial responders of which 5 became seizure free. The average maximum LEV dosage was 39.8 mg/kg/day (range: 6-70 mg/kg/day) with no difference responders vs. no responders. The retention rate for responders after 3 years was 22.5%. The rate of side effects was 39.8% in all patients, with the most frequent side effects being fatigue (12.5%), aggressiveness (7.8%) and gastrointestinal disorders (13.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study in patients with refractory epilepsy suggests that our initial responders were very likely to be still taking LEV after 3 years. We therefore consider treatment with LEV in this special group of patients with refractory epilepsy a promising therapeutic option, because of its favourable tolerance profile, the option of fast titration and the absence of drug interactions.

Levetiracetam: the profile of a novel anticonvulsant drug-part I: preclinical data

The objective of this article was to review and summarize the available reports on the preclinical profile of the novel anticonvulsant drug levetiracetam (LEV). Therefore, a careful search was conducted in the MEDLINE database and combined with guidelines from regulatory agencies, proceedings of professional scientific meetings, and information provided by the manufacturers. This article provides detailed information on the anticonvulsant effects of LEV in various animal models of epilepsy and on its pharmacology in laboratory animals. The mechanism of action of LEV is reviewed, with special regard to its recently discovered binding site, the synaptic vesicle protein 2A. In general, LEV is shown to be a safe, broad-spectrum anticonvulsant drug with highly beneficial pharmacokinetic properties and a distinct mechanism of action. The clinical studies with LEV will be discussed in the second part of this review article to be published subsequently.

Unilateral low-frequency stimulation of central piriform cortex inhibits amygdaloid-kindled seizures in Sprague–Dawley rats

The central piriform cortex (cPC) is considered to be critically involved in the generation and propagation of kindled seizures. Our previous study found that low-frequency stimulation (LFS) of the cPC inhibits the development process of amygdala kindling. In this study, we determined whether unilateral LFS of the cPC had an inhibitory effect on amygdaloid-kindled seizures in Sprague-Dawley rats. When fully-kindled seizures were achieved by daily amygdala electrical stimulation (2 s train of 1 ms pulses at 60 Hz and 150-300 microA), LFS (15 min train of 0.1 ms pulses at 1 Hz and 50-150 microA) was applied to the ipsilateral or contralateral cPC 1 s after cessation of kindling stimulation for 10 days. LFS of the ipsilateral cPC significantly decreased the incidence of generalized seizures and seizure stage, and shortened cumulative afterdischarge duration and cumulative generalized seizure duration. LFS of the contralateral cPC also significantly decreased the expression of seizure stage, but had no appreciable effect on the generalized seizure incidence, cumulative afterdischarge duration and cumulative generalized seizure duration. On the other hand, LFS of the ipsilateral cPC significantly increased the afterdischarge threshold and further increased the differences of current intensity between afterdischarge threshold and generalized seizure threshold. Our data suggest that LFS of the cPC may be an effective method of inhibiting kindled seizures by preventing both afterdischarge generation and propagation. It provide further evidence that brain regions like the cPC, other than the seizure focus, can serve as targets for deep brain stimulation treatment of epilepsy.

Study pharmacologic of the GABAergic and glutamatergic drugs on seizures and status epilepticus induced by pilocarpine in adult Wistar rats

This work was designed to study the influence of drugs during seizures and status epilepticus (SE) induced by pilocarpine and mortality in adult rats. Glutamate (10 and 20 mg/kg), N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA, 5 and 10 mg/kg), ketamine (1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg), gabapentin (200 and 250 mg/kg), phenobarbital (50 and 100 mg/kg) and vigabatrin (250 and 500 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally, 30 min prior to pilocarpine (400 mg/kg, i.p.). The animals were observed (24 h) to determine: number of peripheral cholinergic signs, tremors, stereotyped movements, seizures, SE, latency to first seizure and number of deaths after pilocarpine treatment. NMDA and glutamate had pro-convulsive effects in both doses tested. Smaller and higher doses of these drugs no protected and increased pilocarpine-induced seizures and/or mortality. Gabapentin, vigabatrin, phenobarbital and ketamine protected against seizures and increased the latency to first seizure. Thus, these results suggest that caution should be taken in the selection of pharmacotherapy and dosages for patients with seizures and SE because of the possibility of facility the convulsive process toxicity, SE and the mortality of adult animals in this seizures model that is similar temporal lobo epilepsy in humans.

Resistance to phenobarbital extends to phenytoin in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE

Most patients who are resistant to the first antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment are also resistant to a treatment with a second or third AED, indicating that patients who have an inadequate response to initial treatment with AEDs are likely to have refractory epilepsy. Animal models of refractory epilepsy are important tools to study mechanisms of AED resistance and develop new treatment strategies for counteracting resistance. We have recently described a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), in which spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) develop after a status epilepticus induced by sustained electrical stimulation of the basolateral amygdala. Prolonged treatment of epileptic rats with phenobarbital (PB) resulted in two subgroups, PB responders and PB nonresponders.

METHODS

In the present study we examined if rats with PB-resistant seizures are also resistant to phenytoin (PHT), using continuous EEG/video recording of spontaneous seizures.

RESULTS

First, a new group of 15 epileptic rats was produced and selected by treatment with PB into responders (8 rats) and nonresponders (6 rats), respectively. During subsequent treatment with PHT, the doses of PHT had to be individually adjusted for each rat to avoid toxicity. Treatment with PHT led to complete seizure control in two animals and a >50% reduction of seizure frequency in three other rats, which were considered PHT responders. In nine of the remaining rats, PHT did not exert any clear anticonvulsant effect, so that these rats were considered nonresponders. Plasma levels of PHT did not differ significantly between responders and nonresponders. When comparing the PB and PHT nonresponder groups, five of the six PB-resistant rats (83%) were also resistant to PHT, demonstrating that rats that have an inadequate response to initial treatment with PB are likely to be also resistant to treatment with a second AED.

CONCLUSIONS

The AED-resistant rats of our model meet the definition of pharmacoresistance in animal models, that is, persistent seizure activity not responding to at least two AEDs at maximum tolerated doses. This new model of pharmacoresistant TLE may be useful in the targeted development of new therapies for refractory epilepsy.

Effect of gabaergic, glutamatergic, antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs on pilocarpine-induced seizures and status epilepticus

This work was designed to study the influence of drugs during seizures and status epilepticus (SE) induced by pilocarpine and mortality in adult rats. Fluoxetine (10 and 20 mg/kg), NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate, 10 and 20 mg/kg), amitriptyline (25 and 50 mg/kg), ketamine (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg), gabapentin (100 and 150 mg/kg) and pimozide (10 and 20 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally, 30 min prior to pilocarpine (400mg/kg, s.c.). The animals were observed (24h) to determine: number of peripheral cholinergic signs, tremors, stereotyped movements, seizures, SE, latency to first seizure and number of deaths after pilocarpine treatment. Fluoxetine, amitriptyline, NMDA, and pimozide had proconvulsant effects in both doses tested. Smaller and higher doses of these drugs no protected and increased pilocarpine-induced seizures and/or mortality. Gabapentin and ketamine protected against seizures and reduced the latency to first seizure. Thus, these results suggest that caution should be taken in the selection of pharmacotherapy and dosages for patients with epilepsy because of the possibility of potentiating convulsive process toxicity.

Levetiracetam: antiepileptic properties and protective effects on mitochondrial dysfunction in experimental status epilepticus

PURPOSE

To assess the anticonvulsant activity of the novel antiepileptic drug, levetiracetam (LEV) in a model of self-sustaining limbic status epilepticus, and to measure the consequence of LEV treatment on the pattern of mitochondrial dysfunction known to occur after status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

The rat perforant pathway was stimulated for 2 h to induce self-sustaining status epilepticus (SSSE). Stimulated rats were assigned to one of three treatment groups, receiving intraperitoneal injections of saline, 200 mg/kg LEV, or 1,000 mg/kg LEV, 15 min into SSSE and at 3 times over the next 44-h period. All animals received diazepam after 3-h SSSE to terminate seizures. Forty-four hours later, the hippocampi were extracted and prepared for electrochemical high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), to measure reduced glutathione levels, and for spectrophotometric assays to measure activities of mitochondrial enzymes (aconitase, alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, complex I, and complex II/III). These parameters were compared between treatment groups and with sham-operated rats.

RESULTS

LEV administration did not terminate seizures or have any significant effect on spike frequency, although rats that received 1,000 mg/kg LEV did exhibit improved behavioral seizure parameters. Significant biochemical changes occurred in saline-treated stimulated rats compared with shams: with reductions in glutathione, alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, aconitase, citrate synthase, and complex I activities. Complex II/III activities were unchanged throughout. Rats that received 1,000 mg/kg LEV had significantly improved biochemical parameters, in many instances, comparable to sham control levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite continuing seizures, administration of LEV (1,000 mg/kg) protects against mitochondrial dysfunction, indicating that in addition to its antiepileptic actions, LEV may have neuroprotective effects.

Activity profile of pregabalin in rodent models of epilepsy and ataxia

Pregabalin (Lyrica) is a novel amino acid compound that binds with high affinity to the alpha2-delta (alpha2-delta) auxiliary protein of voltage-gated calcium channels. In vivo, it potently prevents seizures, pain-related behaviors and has anxiolytic-like activity in rodent models. The present studies were performed to determine the profile of pregabalin anticonvulsant activity in a variety of mouse and rat models. In the high-intensity electroshock test, pregabalin potently inhibited tonic extensor seizures in rats (ED50 = 1.8 mg/kg, PO), and low-intensity electroshock seizures in mice. It prevented tonic extensor seizures in the DBA/2 audiogenic mouse model (ED50 = 2.7 mg/kg, PO). Its time course of action against electroshock induced seizures in rats roughly followed the pharmacokinetics of radiolabeled drug in the brain compartment. At higher dosages (ED50 1= 31 mg/kg, PO), pregabalin prevented clonic seizures from pentylenetetrazole in mice. In a kindled rat model of partial seizures, pregabalin prevented stages 4-5 behavioral seizures (lowest effective dose = 10 mg/kg, IP), and also reduced the duration of electrographic seizures. Pregabalin was not active to prevent spontaneous absence-like seizures in the Genetic Absence Epilepsy in Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS) inbred Wistar rat strain. Pregabalin caused ataxia and decreased spontaneous locomotor activity at dosages 10-30-fold higher than those active to prevent seizures. These findings suggest that pregabalin has an anticonvulsant mechanism different from the prototype antiepileptic drugs and similar to that of gabapentin except with increased potency and bioavailability. In summary, our results show that pregabalin has several properties that favor treatment of partial seizures in humans.

Chronic levetiracetam treatment early in life decreases epileptiform events in young GAERS, but does not prevent the expression of spike and wave discharges during adulthood

PURPOSE

In Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS), age-related absence seizures start to appear from postnatal day (PN) 30 concomitant with 'spike and wave discharges' (SWDs) appearing on cortical EEG recordings. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early chronic levetiracetam (LEV) treatment on the development of SWDs in young and adult GAERS.

METHODS

From PN 23 until PN 60, LEV (54 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered once daily to GAERS (n=8), while control GAERS (n=7) received saline (0.9% NaCl, i.p.). All animals were implanted with four epidural EEG electrodes at PN 51. EEG was recorded for 3h daily, during the last 4 days of the treatment (PN 57-PN 60) and during 4 additional days after treatment had been terminated (PN 61-PN 64). The animals were monitored again at the age of 4 months (PN 120-PN 124), about 2 months after the last administration of LEV.

RESULTS

During treatment, epileptiform events in the LEV group were significantly reduced (62%, P<0.05) in comparison with the control group. During the following 4 days, epileptiform events were reduced in the LEV group, with an average difference of 53% (P=0.064). Once the animals had reached adult age, there was no difference in epileptiform events between the LEV group and controls.

CONCLUSION

In this study, chronic LEV administration induced a reduction in epileptiform events in young GAERS. This effect persisted to some extent after treatment cessation (PN 61-PN 64), which might indicate a slowing down of epileptogenic processes. However, at the age of 4 months all animals revealed a similar expression of epileptiform discharges.

Pharmacological and histological characterisation of nicotine-kindled seizures in mice

The present study reports that it is possible to induce kindling by repeated injections of nicotine. The newly characterised nicotine-kindling model was compared with that of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) kindling. Mice were kindled by repeated injection of PTZ (37 mg/kg), or nicotine (2.3 mg/kg), and the effect of the anti-epileptic drugs (AED) levetiracetam (LEV), tiagabine (TGB) and phenytoin (PHT) on seizures in kindled and naive mice were investigated. C-Fos immunoreactivity (Fos IR) was used to investigate differences in neuronal activity pattern between PTZ-, nicotine kindled and naive animals. PTZ kindled animals mainly showed increased Fos IR in limbic regions, whereas Fos IR in nicotine kindled animals was increased in the entorhinal cortex, medial habenula and the compact part of substantia nigra. Fully kindled PTZ-induced seizures were inhibited by LEV (ED50=13.6+/-7.8 mg/kg), TGB (ED50=0.3+/-0.04 mg/kg) but not PHT (ED50>40 mg/kg) whereas fully kindled nicotine-induced seizures were inhibited by LEV (ED50=1.4+/-0.4 mg/kg), TGB (ED50=0.3+/-0.06 mg/kg) and PHT (ED50=9.2+/-2.4 mg/kg). These differences in efficacy of AEDs were not due to changes in plasma levels in the various models. In conclusion, repeated administration of nicotine can induce a kindling-like phenomenon and the model showed significantly different Fos IR pattern and pharmacology to that of PTZ kindling.

Evaluation of levetiracetam effects on pilocarpine-induced seizures: Cholinergic muscarinic system involvement

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a new antiepileptic drug effective as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures. It displays a unique pharmacological profile against experimental models of seizures, including pilocarpine-induced seizures in rodents. Aiming to clarify if anticonvulsant activity of LEV occurs due to cholinergic alterations, adult male mice received LEV injections before cholinergic agonists' administration. Pretreatment with LEV (30-200 mg/kg, i.p.) increased the latencies of seizures, but decreased status epilepticus and death on the seizure model induced by pilocarpine, 400 mg/kg, s.c. (P400). LEV (LEV200, 200 mg/kg, i.p.) pretreatment also reduced the intensity of tremors induced by oxotremorine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p). [3H]-N-methylscopolamine-binding assays in mice hippocampus showed that LEV200 pretreatment reverts the downregulation on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR), induced by P400 administration, bringing back these density values to control ones (0.9% NaCl, i.p.). However, subtype-specific-binding assays revealed that P400- and LEV-alone treatments result in M1 and M2 subtypes decrease, respectively. The agonist-like behavior of LEV on the inhibitory M2 mAChR subtype, observed in this work, could contribute to explain the reduction on oxotremorine-induced tremors and the delay on pilocarpine-induced seizures, by an increase in the attenuation of neuronal activity mediated by the M1 receptors.

Anticonvulsant effects of levetiracetam and levetiracetam-diazepam combinations in experimental status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency, with high mortality and high morbidity among survivors, and novel therapeutic agents are needed to improve this picture. We examined the effects of the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) in an experimental model of self-sustaining status epilepticus (SSSE), induced in rats by electrical stimulation of the perforant path. LEV's unique spectrum of anticonvulsant activity, very high therapeutic index, and neuroprotective properties, make it a potentially interesting agent in the treatment of SE. Pretreatment with LEV intravenously reduced (30 mg/kg) or prevented (50-1000 mg/kg) the development of self-sustaining seizures. Treatment during the maintenance phase of SSSE diminished (at 200 mg/kg) or aborted seizures (in doses of 500 or 1000 mg/kg). Addition of LEV significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant effects of diazepam (DZP), even when both drugs where given in doses far below their therapeutic level. We conclude that LEV deserves further evaluation in the treatment of status epilepticus.

Enterocolitis: an adverse event in refractory epilepsy patients treated with levetiracetam?

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a recently marketed novel anti-epileptic drug with a promising efficacy and safety profile. In this report we describe two patients who presented with enterocolitis and discuss the possible relationship with concurrent LEV intake.

PATIENTS

In two patients. LEV was initiated to control refractory complex partial seizures (CPS). The first patient was treated with 1500 mg/day and complained of abdominal pain and weight loss 6 months later. Internal examination and colonoscopy revealed a punctate colitis. The second patient presented with bloody stool 1 month after LEV initiation. Colonoscopy showed punctate colitis. In both patients gastrointestinal symptoms disappeared following tapering of LEV.

DISCUSSION

There are no reports in the literature describing colitis related to LEV intake. Three possible mechanisms of action are discussed. Colitis may be part of a hypersensitivity syndrome caused by LEV. Pharmacodynamic interactions with other anti-epileptic drugs, for example, carbamazepine may play a role. A haematological adverse event is another possibility since piracetam, a related molecule, has a known impact on erythrocytes and platelets.

CONCLUSION

The close temporal relationship between initiation of LEV intake, symptomatic colitis and clinical improvement following LEV tapering, suggests that colitis may be a possible and previously undescribed adverse effect of LEV.

Preclinical development of antiepileptic drugs: past, present, and future directions

Since 1993, nine new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced into the U.S. market for the symptomatic treatment of partial epilepsy. Their antiepileptic activity was, for the most part, defined by acute seizure models such as the maximal electroshock (MES) and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol (scPTZ) seizure tests and the kindled rat. Unfortunately, the clinical evidence to date would suggest that none of these models, albeit useful, are likely to identify those therapeutics that will effectively manage the patient with refractory seizures. In recent years, a number of in vivo and in vitro models have been developed that display varying degrees of pharmacoresistance. As such, they may provide a unique opportunity for identifying the truly novel AED. Through a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of acquired epilepsy at the molecular and genetic level, it may be possible to identify a new therapeutic approach that reaches beyond the symptomatic treatment of epilepsy to modify the progression, or, dare we suggest, prevent the development of epilepsy in the susceptible patient. The realization of such a possibility will necessitate a change in our current AED discovery approach. The present review describes the current approach used in the search for new AEDs and offers some insight into future directions incorporating new and emerging models of therapy resistance and epileptogenesis.

Multidrug resistance protein MRP2 contributes to blood-brain barrier function and restricts antiepileptic drug activity

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a physical and metabolic barrier between the brain and the systemic circulation, which functions to protect the brain from circulating drugs, toxins, and xenobiotics. ATP-dependent multidrug transporters such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp; ABCB1), which are found in the apical (luminal) membranes of brain capillary endothelial cells, are thought to play an important role in BBB function by limiting drug penetration into the brain. More recently, the multidrug resistance protein MRP2 (ABCC2) has been found in the luminal surface of brain capillary endothelium of different species, including humans. In endothelial cells from patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, MRP2 was shown to be overexpressed, indicating that it may be critically involved in multidrug resistance of such patients. However, the role of MRP2 in drug disposition into the brain is defined poorly. Herein, we used different strategies to study the contribution of MRP2 to BBB function. First, the MRP inhibitor probenecid was shown to increase extracellular brain levels of the major antiepileptic drug phenytoin in rats, indicating that phenytoin is a substrate of MRP2 in the BBB. This was substantiated by using MRP2-deficient TR- rats, in which extracellular brain levels of phenytoin were significantly higher compared with the normal background strain. In the kindling model of epilepsy, coadministration of probenecid significantly increased the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin. In kindled MRP2-deficient rats, phenytoin exerted a markedly higher anticonvulsant activity than in normal rats. These data indicate that MRP2 substantially contributes to BBB function.

Characterization of the anticonvulsant profile and enantioselective pharmacokinetics of the chiral valproylamide propylisopropyl acetamide in rodents

1. Propylisopropyl acetamide (PID) is a new chiral amide derivative of valproic acid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anticonvulsant activity of PID in rodent models of partial, secondarily generalized and sound-induced generalized seizures which focus on different methods of seizure induction, both acute stimuli, and following short-term plastic changes as a result of kindling, and to assess enantioselectivity and enantiomer-enantiomer interactions in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of racemic PID and its pure enantiomers in rodents. 2. Anticonvulsant activity of (S)-PID, (R)-PID and racemic PID was evaluated in the 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model in mice, in the hippocampal kindled rat, and in the Frings audiogenic seizure susceptible mouse. The pharmacokinetics of (S)-PID and (R)-PID was studied in mice and rats. 3. In mice (S)-PID, (R)-PID and racemic PID were effective in preventing the 6 Hz seizures with (R)-PID being significantly (P < 0.05) more potent (ED(50) values 11 mg kg(-1), 46 mg kg(-1) and 57 mg kg(-1) at stimulation intensities of 22, 32 and 44 mA, respectively) than (S)-PID (ED(50) values 20 mg kg(-1), 73 mg kg(-1) and 81 mg kg(-1) at stimulation intensities of 22, 32 and 44 mA, respectively). (S)-PID, (R)-PID and racemic PID also blocked generalized seizures in the Frings mice (ED(50) values 16 mg kg(-1), 20 mg kg(-1) and 19 mg kg(-1) respectively). 4. In the hippocampal kindled rat a dose of 40 mg kg(-1) of (R)- and (S)-PID prevented the secondarily generalized seizure, whereas racemic PID also blocked the expression of partial seizures following an i.p. dose of 40 mg kg(-1). Racemic PID also significantly increased the seizure threshold in this model. 5. Mechanistic studies showed that PID did not affect voltage-sensitive sodium channels or kainate-, GABA- or NMDA- evoked currents. 6. The pharmacokinetics of PID was enantioselective following i.p. administration of individual enantiomers to mice, with (R)-PID having lower clearance and longer half-life than (S)-PID. In rats and mice, no enantioselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of PID was observed following administration of the racemate, which may be due to enantiomer-enantiomer interaction. 7. This study demonstrated that PID has both enantioselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The better anticonvulsant potency of (R)-PID in comparison to (S)-PID may be due to its more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. The enhanced efficacy of the racemate over the individual enantiomers in the kindled rat may be explained by a pharmacokinetic enantiomer-enantiomer interaction in rats. This study also showed the importance of studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral drugs following administration of the individual enantiomers as well as the racemic mixture.

Is refractory epilepsy preventable?

About a third of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy will not be fully controlled with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and many of them will have frequent and disabling seizures. These patients will undergo multiple drug trials, most often without complete seizure remission. Moreover, refractory epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity (from seizures and medications), social isolation, unemployment, and overall reduced quality of life. There is evidence that refractory epilepsy can be a progressive disorder, which, if controlled early, might never develop into a full syndrome with all of its associated sequelae. The difficulty lies in identifying at an early stage patients who are likely to progress to intractability. No currently known markers enable clinicians to make this identification with confidence. Advances in pharmacogenomics and our understanding of pharmacologic responsiveness in epilepsy may change this situation. Even now, we are able to identify many patients with a poor prognosis earlier than before, particularly in the pediatric population, in which syndromic classification may provide an approach to predict intractability. The early initiation of aggressive therapy may improve outcome and overall quality of life.

Effect of phenytoin on sodium and calcium currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons of phenytoin-resistant kindled rats

About 20-30% of patients with epilepsy continue to have seizures despite carefully monitored treatment with antiepileptic drugs. The mechanisms explaining why some patients' respond and others prove resistant to antiepileptic drugs are poorly understood. It has been proposed that pharmacoresistance is related to reduced sensitivity of sodium channels in hippocampal neurons to antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine or phenytoin. In line with this proposal, a reduced effect of carbamazepine on sodium currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons was found in the rat kindling model of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), i.e. a form of epilepsy with the poorest prognosis of all epilepsy types in adult patients. To address directly the possibility that neuronal sodium currents in the hippocampus play a crucial role in the pharmacoresistance of TLE, we selected amygdala-kindled rats with respect to their in vivo anticonvulsant response to phenytoin into responders and nonresponders and then compared phenytoin's effect on voltage-activated sodium currents in CA1 neurons. Furthermore, in view of the potential role of calcium current modulation in the anticonvulsant action of phenytoin, the effect of phenytoin on high-voltage-activated calcium currents was studied in CA1 neurons. Electrode-implanted but not kindled rats were used as sham controls for comparison with the kindled rats. In all experiments, the interval between last kindled seizure and ion channel measurements was at least 5 weeks. In kindled rats with in vivo resistance to the anticonvulsant effect of phenytoin (phenytoin nonresponders), in vitro modulation of sodium and calcium currents by phenytoin in hippocampal CA1 neurons did not significantly differ from respective data obtained in phenytoin responders, i.e. phenytoin resistance was not associated with a changed modulation of the sodium or calcium currents by this drug. Compared to sham controls, phenytoin's inhibitory effect on sodium currents was significantly reduced by kindling without difference between the responder and nonresponder subgroups. Further studies in phenytoin-resistant kindled rats may help to elucidate the mechanisms that can explain therapy resistance.