Switching from conventional to novel antipsychotic drugs: results of a prospective naturalistic study

Haloperidol (oral) versus olanzapine (oral) for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is often a severe and disabling psychiatric disorder. Antipsychotics remain the mainstay of psychotropic treatment for people with psychosis. In limited resource and humanitarian contexts, it is key to have several options for beneficial, low-cost antipsychotics, which require minimal monitoring. We wanted to compare oral haloperidol, as one of the most available antipsychotics in these settings, with a second-generation antipsychotic, olanzapine.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical benefits and harms of haloperidol compared to olanzapine for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia study-based register of trials, which is based on monthly searches of CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, ISRCTN, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and WHO ICTRP. We screened the references of all included studies. We contacted relevant authors of trials for additional information where clarification was required or where data were incomplete. The register was last searched on 14 January 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing haloperidol with olanzapine for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Our main outcomes of interest were clinically important change in global state, relapse, clinically important change in mental state, extrapyramidal side effects, weight increase, clinically important change in quality of life and leaving the study early due to adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently evaluated and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial or harmful outcome (NNTB or NNTH) with 95% CI. For continuous data, we estimated mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. For all included studies, we assessed risk of bias (RoB 1) and we used the GRADE approach to create a summary of findings table.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 68 studies randomising 9132 participants. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in clinically important change in global state (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.02; 6 studies, 3078 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in relapse (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.02; 7 studies, 1499 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Haloperidol may reduce the incidence of clinically important change in overall mental state compared to olanzapine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81; 13 studies, 1210 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every eight people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience this improvement. The evidence suggests that haloperidol may result in a large increase in extrapyramidal side effects compared to olanzapine (RR 3.38, 95% CI 2.28 to 5.02; 14 studies, 3290 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every three people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one additional person would experience extrapyramidal side effects. For weight gain, the evidence suggests that there may be a large reduction in the risk with haloperidol compared to olanzapine (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; 18 studies, 4302 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every 10 people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience weight increase. A single study suggests that haloperidol may reduce the incidence of clinically important change in quality of life compared to olanzapine (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; 828 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every nine people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience clinically important improvement in quality of life. Haloperidol may result in an increase in the incidence of leaving the study early due to adverse effects compared to olanzapine (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.47; 21 studies, 5047 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every 22 people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience this outcome. Thirty otherwise relevant studies and several endpoints from 14 included studies could not be evaluated due to inconsistencies and poor transparency of several parameters. Furthermore, even within studies that were included, it was often not possible to use data for the same reasons. Risk of bias differed substantially for different outcomes and the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low. The most common risks of bias leading to downgrading of the evidence were blinding (performance bias) and selective reporting (reporting bias).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the certainty of the evidence was low to very low for the main outcomes in this review, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in terms of clinically important global state and relapse. Olanzapine may result in a slightly greater overall clinically important change in mental state and in a clinically important change in quality of life. Different side effect profiles were noted: haloperidol may result in a large increase in extrapyramidal side effects and olanzapine in a large increase in weight gain. The drug of choice needs to take into account side effect profiles and the preferences of the individual. These findings and the recent inclusion of olanzapine alongside haloperidol in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines should increase the likelihood of it becoming more easily available in low- and middle- income countries, thereby improving choice and providing a greater ability to respond to side effects for people with lived experience of schizophrenia. There is a need for additional research using appropriate and equivalent dosages of these drugs. Some of this research needs to be done in low- and middle-income settings and should actively seek to account for factors relevant to these. Research on antipsychotics needs to be person-centred and prioritise factors that are of interest to people with lived experience of schizophrenia.

Discontinuation and remission rates and social functioning in patients with schizophrenia receiving second-generation antipsychotics: 52-week evaluation of JUMPs, a randomized, open-label study

AIM

Globally, evidence from short-term studies is insufficient for the guidelines to uniformly recommend a particular antipsychotic(s) for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. Therefore, long-term comprehensive evaluation of antipsychotics is required from a social rehabilitation perspective, especially for drugs that have not yet been studied. The Japan Useful Medication Program for Schizophrenia (JUMPs) is a large-scale, long-term naturalistic study to present pivotal 52-week data on the continuity of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA: aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone).

METHODS

JUMPs was an open-label, three-arm, randomized, parallel-group, 52-week study. Enrolled patients had schizophrenia, were ≥20 years old, and required antipsychotic treatment or switched from previous therapy. The primary endpoint was treatment discontinuation rate over 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included remission rate, social functioning, and quality-of-life scores [Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) and EuroQol-5 dimensions], and safety.

RESULTS

In total, 251 patients received aripiprazole (n = 82), blonanserin (n = 85), or paliperidone (n = 84). The discontinuation rate (P = 0.9771) and remission rates (P > 0.05) over 52 weeks did not differ significantly between the three treatment groups. The discontinuation rates were 68.3%, 68.2%, and 65.5% in the aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone groups, respectively. Significant improvements (all P < 0.05) from baseline in PSP scores were observed at start of monotherapy, week 26, and week 52 in the overall cohort and blonanserin group and at week 26 in the aripiprazole group. The adverse event profile favored blonanserin.

CONCLUSION

All three SGAs evaluated in this study showed similar treatment discontinuation rates in patients with chronic schizophrenia in Japan.

Attitude towards Antipsychotic Medications in Patients Diagnosed with Schizophrenia: A Cross-Sectional Study at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Poor attitude towards antipsychotic drugs is high, and it is a factor for non-adherence to treatment. This increases the risk of relapse, associated healthcare utilization, and costs. This study aimed to assess attitude towards antipsychotic medication among patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this institution based cross-sectional study was to assess attitude towards antipsychotic medications and associated factors among patients with schizophrenia who attend the outpatient clinics at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, 2018.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 393 schizophrenic patients from Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital were recruited by a systematic random sampling technique. Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10) was used to assess attitude, experience, and belief about antipsychotics. Glasgow antipsychotic side effect scale modified version, positive and negative syndrome scale, and Birch wood's insight scale for psychosis were the instruments used to assess the associated factors. Simple and multiple linear regression analysis models were fitted, and the adjusted unstandardized beta (β) coefficient at 95% confidence interval was used.

RESULTS

The mean score of attitude towards antipsychotic medications was 6.51 with standard deviation (SD) of 2.22. In multiple linear regression, positive symptoms (β= -0.07, 95% CI: (-0.09, -0.05)), negative symptoms (β= -0.04, 95% CI: (-0.06,-0.02)), shorter (≤5 years) duration of illness (β= -0.39, 95% CI: (-0.63, -0.15)), first generation antipsychotics (β = -0.35, 95% CI: (-0.55,-0.14)), having sedation (β= -0.28, 95% CI: (-0.52, -0.02)), and extra-pyramidal side effects (β= -0.34, 95% CI: (-0.59,-0.09)) were factors negatively associated with attitude towards antipsychotic medication treatment. Insight to illness (β= 0.24, 95% CI: (0.20, 0.27) was a factor positively associated with attitude towards antipsychotic medications.

CONCLUSION

The result suggests that the mean score of participants' attitude towards antipsychotic medications was good. Prevention of side effects particularly due to first generation antipsychotics is necessary.

Current and potential pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for anxiety symptoms and disorders in patients with schizophrenia: structured review

OBJECTIVE

Between 30% and 62% of patients with schizophrenia present with co-morbid anxiety disorders that are associated with increased overall burden. Our aim was to summarize current and potential interventions for anxiety in schizophrenia.

DESIGN

Structured review, summarizing pharmacological and psychosocial interventions used to reduce anxiety in schizophrenia and psychosis.

RESULTS

Antipsychotics have been shown to reduce anxiety, increase anxiety, or have no effect. These may be augmented with another antipsychotic, anxiolytic, or antidepressant. Novel agents, such as L-theanine, pregabalin, and cycloserine, show promise in attenuating anxiety in schizophrenia. Psychosocial therapies have been developed to reduce the distress of schizophrenia. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has shown that benefit and refinements in the therapy have been successful, for example, for managing worry in schizophrenia. CBT usually involves more than 16 sessions, as short courses of CBT do not attenuate the presentation of anxiety in schizophrenia. To address time and cost, the development of manualized CBT to address anxiety in schizophrenia is being developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of coexisting anxiety symptoms and co-morbid anxiety disorders should be ascertained when assessing patients with schizophrenia or other psychoses as a range of pharmacological and psychosocial treatments are available.

Decline in the severity or the incidence of schizophrenia in Japan: A survey of university students

Clinical manifestations of schizophrenia are believed to be becoming less severe in Japan, but little evidence supports this theory. We investigated the percentages of undergraduate students attending national universities in Japan who required temporary leave and who dropped out because of schizophrenia in the academic years 1986-1987, 1994-1995, and 2013-2014. The percentages of students who required temporary leave and those who dropped out because of schizophrenia significantly decreased over time. The severity of clinical manifestations of schizophrenia may have decreased, enabling more students with schizophrenia to continue their study, or the incidence of schizophrenia might have declined.

Hospitalization and cost after switching from atypical to typical antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients in Thailand

Background

Several clinical practice guidelines suggest using atypical over typical antipsychotics in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, cost-containment policy urged restricting usage of atypical antipsychotics and switching from atypical to typical antipsychotics.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate clinical and economic impacts of switching from atypical to typical antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients in Thailand.

Methods

From October 2010 through September 2013, a retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing electronic database of two tertiary hospitals. Schizophrenia patients aged 18 years or older and being treated with atypical antipsychotics were included. Patients were classified as atypical antipsychotic switching group if they switched to typical antipsychotics after 180 days of continual atypical antipsychotics therapy. Outcomes were schizophrenia-related hospitalization and total health care cost. Logistic and Poisson regression were used to evaluate the risk of hospitalization, and generalized linear model with gamma distribution was used to determine the health care cost. All analyses were adjusted by employing propensity score and multivariable analyses. All cost estimates were adjusted according to 2013 consumer price index and converted to US$ at an exchange rate of 32.85 Thai bahts/US$.

Results

A total of 2,354 patients were included. Of them, 166 (7.1%) patients switched to typical antipsychotics. The adjusted odds ratio for schizophrenia-related hospitalization in atypical antipsychotic switching group was 1.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–2.83). The adjusted incidence rate ratio was 2.44 (95% CI 1.57–3.79) for schizophrenia-related hospitalizations. The average total health care cost was lower in patients with antipsychotic switching (−$64; 95% CI −$459 to $332).

Conclusion

Switching from atypical to typical antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia-related hospitalization. Nonetheless, association with average total health care cost was not observed. These findings can be of use as a part of evidence in executing prospective cost-containment policy.

Antipsychotic medication-induced dysphoria: its meaning, association with typical vs. atypical medications and impact on adherence

Antipsychotic medication-induced dysphoria is a relatively under-recognized and understudied effect of antipsychotic medication. Although the term is encountered in clinical practice and in the literature, there is no consensus regarding its exact meaning. This article is a narrative review of the literature on antipsychotic medication and dysphoria based on a pubmed database search. We found that antipsychotic medication-induced dysphoria is a term used to describe a negative and unpleasant affective state which seems to be more often associated with high potency first-generation antipsychotics and could potentially lead to medication non-adherence. Though it is plausible to expect antipsychotic medication-induced dysphoria to be related to extrapyramidal symptoms, most especially akathisia, the nature of the association remains unspecified. Furthermore, there is some evidence that dopamine blockade maybe involved in the pathogenesis of antipsychotic medication-induced dysphoria. However, the limited methods of the currently available studies make it impossible to conclusively address the question of which class of antipsychotic (first- or second-generation) has a higher prevalence and severity of the syndrome.

Correlation between changes in quality of life and symptomatic improvement in Chinese patients switched from typical antipsychotics to olanzapine

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between changes in symptoms and changes in self-reported quality of life among Chinese patients with schizophrenia who were switched from a typical antipsychotic to olanzapine during usual outpatient care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post hoc analysis was conducted using data from the Chinese subgroup (n=475) of a multicountry, 12-month, prospective, noninterventional, observational study. The primary publication previously reported the efficacy, safety, and quality of life among patients who switched from a typical antipsychotic to olanzapine. Patients with schizophrenia were included if their symptoms were inadequately controlled with a typical antipsychotic and they were switched to olanzapine. Symptom severity was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Abbreviated (WHOQOL-BREF). Paired t-tests were performed to assess changes from baseline to endpoint. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess the correlations between change in symptoms (BPRS and CGI-S scores) and change in HRQOL (WHOQOL-BREF scores).

RESULTS

Symptoms and HRQOL both improved significantly over the 12 months of treatment (P<0.001). Significant correlations were observed between changes from baseline to end of study on the BPRS and the CGI-S and each of the WHOQOL-BREF four domain scores and two overall quality-of-life questions. The correlation coefficients ranged from r=-0.45 to r=-0.53 for the BPRS and WHOQOL-BREF. The correlation coefficients were slightly smaller between the CGI-S and WHOQOL-BREF, ranging from r=-0.33 to r=-0.40.

CONCLUSION

For patients with schizophrenia, assessing quality of life has the potential to add valuable information to the clinical assessment that takes into account the patient's own perspective of well-being.

Cultural translation and Tunisian validation of the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-30) in outpatients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to treatment in patients with schizophrenia is associated with increased hospitalization, higher health care costs, and poorer long-term outcomes in terms of relapse rates. It is established that a negative drug attitude was a risk factor for non-adherence in long-term schizophrenia. The scale "Drug Attitude Inventory" is one of the scales designed to assess this concept. It has been translated and validated in different languages. However, its psychometric properties have not yet been studied in our sociocultural context.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to translate into Tunisian Arabic dialect the scale "Drug Attitude Inventory" with 30 dichotomous items (DAI-30) and validate it in Tunisian sociocultural context in patients with schizophrenia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed in 234 outpatients with schizophrenia, recruited through a random drawing. These patients are in remission and meet remission criteria proposed by "The Remission in schizophrenia Working Group". We recruited 30 patients for pretest and 204 patients for linguistic validation. Forward and backward translation of the DAI-30 was performed according to the protocol of the "MAPI Research Institute". This final version was submitted to 24 experts and followed by a pretest. Construct validity has been established by performing a principal component analysis factor on a sample of 204 patients. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha coefficient and inter-rater reliability was assessed by the use of Intra-Class Correlation coefficient (ICC). For the test-retest reliability evaluation, the "r" Pearson's coefficient was used between the DAI scores obtained in the initial evaluation and those obtained at 15 days.

RESULTS

Regarding construct validity, factor analysis revealed seven factors that were responsible for 59.9% of the variance. The study of internal consistency between the 30 items was rated good (α=0.88). The test-retest reliability was satisfactory (r=0.99, p<10(-3)), as well as inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.99).

CONCLUSION

In the Tunisian cultural context, the DAI-30 presented seven factors with good consistency and an inter-rater reliability.

A brief version of the Subjects' Response to Antipsychotics questionnaire to evaluate treatment effects

BACKGROUND

Monitoring patients' experiences with antipsychotics may help to improve medication adherence and outcome. We aimed to develop a shorter version of a comprehensive 74-item self-report questionnaire suitable for routine monitoring of desired and undesired effects of antipsychotics.

METHODS

Included were patients with psychotic disorders from seven mental health care organizations in The Netherlands, using antipsychotic medication, who completed the Subjects' Response to Antipsychotics (SRA-74). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and similarity analysis based on mutual information were used to identify the latent factor structure of the SRA. Items were reduced according to their metric properties and clinical relevance upon consensus by an expert panel, using a Delphi procedure of three rounds. We determined the internal consistency of the shorter version using Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

SRA data of N=1478 patients (mean age of 40 years, 31% females) were eligible for analysis. EFA extracted thirteen factors from the SRA-74, including four factors for desired effects (e.g. recovery of psychosis, cognition and social functioning) and nine factors for undesired effects (e.g. weight gain, flattened affect and increased sleep). Based on this solution 12 items were eliminated for statistical reasons. The expert panel eliminated another 28 items with redundant content, resulting in a 34-item version. The SRA-34 includes 10 desired and 24 clinically relevant undesired effects. Both the subscales for desired and undesired effects have a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRA-34 can be used to evaluate desired and undesired effects of antipsychotics in routine clinical practice and research.

Treatment-refractory schizophrenia

Between one-third and one-half of the individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia remain actively ill despite optimal pharmacological treatment. These individuals tend to progressively deteriorate in terms of social and vocational functioning despite major public and private investments in their rehabilitation. For patients who do not respond to the first prescribed antipsychotic drug, current clinical practice is to switch to a second and a third drug, and eventually to clozapine, the only antipsychotic drug proven to be effective in treatment-refractory schizophrenia (TRS). Occasionally, two antipsychotics are given concomitantly or psychotropic drugs are added to antipsychotic drugs; however, very few empirical data exist to support this practice. Although there are many exceptions, patients who do not benefit from the first prescribed drug will not benefit from any pharmacological intervention. Therefore, efforts are under way to determine the reason for lack of response to available treatments and devise novel, more effective treatments. To be successful these efforts must result in a more specific definition of TRS, as well as in a better understanding of the illness pathophysiology and the mechanism of action of the drugs.

A global measure to assess switching antipsychotic medications in the treatment of schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

It is common practice to switch antipsychotic medications in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia to enhance clinical efficacy and/or reduce drug-related side effects. The conventional Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of severity scale is a well-understood measure to track switching effects but does not differentiate between the severity of clinical symptoms and the impact of side effects..

METHODS

We developed a CGI-switch instrument that contains distinct global severity scales for clinical efficacy, safety and/or tolerability, and a third unified (integrated) CGI severity score to assess these interrelated assessments. An integrated Clinical Global Impression of Change was also created to assess global clinical change relative to the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability conducted as part of a rater-training program for a clinical study (Novartis protocol CIL0522D; clinitrials.gov identifier: CT01207414) revealed high interrater agreement (Cronbach's alpha = 0.945). Data were collected from 1066 CGI assessments during the course of the trial. CGI raters easily grasped the utility of the instrument. The distinction made between efficacy and safety/tolerability facilitated serial tracking of each condition during the course of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The modified CGI-switch instrument is a simple, reliable, and practical metric to assess the benefits, if any of switching antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia.

Is it time to consider comorbid substance abuse as a new indication for antipsychotic drug development?

Comorbid drug abuse in schizophrenia has been consistently reported as high, with estimates ranging between 10-70%. Comorbid addictive states in schizophrenia are possibly multifactorial, yet recent research assigns a significant neurobiological role in its genesis. Abnormalities in hippocampal/cortical function in schizophrenia which mediate reward and reinforcement behavior are identified as central to the development and maintenance of comorbid addictive states. Preliminary data suggest that the vulnerability of patients with schizophrenia to substance use disorders may be a primary disease symptom. The management of comorbid substance abuse in schizophrenia relies on the use of antipsychotic medications. Recent data raise the concern about whether first-generation antipsychotics in long-term use can conversely lead to enhancement of the abused substance's reinforcing properties. Some recent reports have assigned a favorable outcome to clozapine and second-generation antipsychotics, pointing to a possible differential role for various antipsychotics. In view of the high prevalence of comorbid drug abuse in schizophrenia, its impact on outcome of treatment and the recent emerging neurobiological information, it is my contention that comorbid drug abuse constitutes a dimension by itself and deserves to receive an indication in the development of new antipsychotics similar to negative symptoms or cognitive deficits.

Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: a review of the humanistic burden

INTRODUCTION

Nearly every individual with schizophrenia is affected by cognitive decline. The aim of this literature review was to: (a) describe the humanistic burden of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS); (b) develop a conceptual model that depicts the signs and symptoms of CIAS along with key concepts important to patients; and (c) consider the adequacy of potential patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for assessing future treatments.

METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched for articles published between January 1999 and November 2009 related to CIAS and PROs, or cost of illness: Medline; Embase; PsycINFO; the Health Economic Evaluation Database; and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment databases at the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed 3950 abstracts, of which 101 articles were reviewed in detail. Cognitive functions affected include memory, attention/concentration, problem solving, learning, executive function, processing speed, and social cognition. Cognitive impairment impacts the ability of individuals to carry out activities of daily living, work productively, function socially, and adhere to treatment. These effects have economic ramifications through increased direct and indirect costs associated with the treatment of schizophrenia. The literature revealed 39 PRO instruments that have been used to assess functioning. However, no single instrument captures all key concepts of importance to patients with schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

The significant burden from CIAS for patients and society has implications for designing future treatments and health strategies to improve functional outcomes.

Antipsychotic agents: efficacy and safety in schizophrenia

Antipsychotics have provided a great improvement in the management of people with schizophrenia. The first generation antipsychotics could establish the possibility of managing many psychotic subjects in an outpatient setting. With the advent of the second (SGA) and third generation antipsychotics (TGA), other psychiatric disorders such as bipolar depression, bipolar mania, autism, and major depressive disorder have now been approved for the use of these drugs for their treatment. Also, the administration of more specific assessment tools has allowed for better delineation of the repercussions of these drugs on symptoms and the quality of life of patients who use antipsychotic agents. In general, the SGA share similar mechanisms of action to achieve these results: dopamine-2 receptor antagonism plus serotonin-2A receptor antagonism. The TGA (eg, aripiprazole) have partial agonist activity at the dopamine-2 receptor site, and are also called dopaminergic stabilizers. The pharmacological profile of SGA and TGA may provide better efficacy against negative symptoms, and are less likely to produce extrapyramidal symptoms; however, the SGA and TGA are associated with many other adverse events. The clinician has to balance the risks and benefits of these medications when choosing an antipsychotic for an individual patient.

Unmet treatment needs in schizophrenia patients: is asenapine a potential therapeutic option?

Adverse metabolic events, such as increased adiposity, hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, have been associated with treatment using atypical antipsychotic medications. However, the complexity of some of the reports on this problem and marketing efforts in this area may make it difficult for psychiatrists to remain fully and accurately informed about the metabolic complications of atypical antipsychotic therapy. Little is currently known about how psychiatrists view what they have read or heard, how they perceive the available information and how this affects their management of patients with schizophrenia. A number of studies have demonstrated that nonadherence to the medication regimen in schizophrenia is associated with poor symptomatic outcome, increased risk of relapse, more frequent use of compulsory treatment and increased risk of suicide and severe self-harm. Suicide is a major cause of death among schizophrenic patients, and their attitude toward medication can make the difference between a proper therapeutic regimen that protects patients from suicide risk versus discontinuation of treatments that are associated with disabling symptoms, some of which are risk factors for suicide. We review the characteristics of a new drug, asenapine, that may improve adherence in patients as a result of a distinctive receptor profile that may be associated with fewer side effects than other second-generation antipsychotic drugs.

Cognitive effects of six months of treatment with quetiapine in antipsychotic-naïve first-episode schizophrenia

Effects of quetiapine on cognition were assessed in a group of first-episode antipsychotic-naïve patients with schizophrenia (N=24). A comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests was administered at baseline and after 6 months of treatment with quetiapine. In order to examine retest effects, a matched healthy control group (N=24) was also tested at baseline and after 6 months. Only few differential changes were observed between patients and healthy controls. Of 8 cognitive domains examined, only significant changes in executive function suggested possible ameliorating effects of quetiapine. Patients also improved on speed of processing; however, this was parallel to the retest effects found in healthy controls. When covaried for differences at baseline, patients showed smaller improvements in speed of processing than the retest effects found in controls, as well as a lack of retest effects on sustained attention and working memory that were found in healthy controls. The main result of the study is that there was very little evidence of efficacy of quetiapine on cognition. The study also indicated a lack of normal retest effects in patients compared to controls.

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Information on cost-effectiveness of interventions to treat schizophrenia can assist health policy decision making, particularly given the lack of health resources in developing countries like Thailand. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment package, including drug and non-drug interventions, for schizophrenia in Thailand.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of typical antipsychotics, generic risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine and family interventions. Health outcomes were measured in disability adjusted life years. We evaluated intervention benefit by estimating a change in disease severity, taking into account potential side effects. Intervention costs included outpatient treatment costs, hospitalization costs as well as time and travel costs of patients and families. Uncertainty was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. A sensitivity analysis of the expected range cost of generic risperidone was undertaken.

RESULTS

Generic risperidone is more cost-effective than typicals if it can be produced for less than 10 baht per 2 mg tablet. Risperidone was the cheapest treatment with higher drug costs offset by lower hospital costs in comparison to typicals. The most cost-effective combination of treatments was a combination of risperidone (dominant intervention). Adding family intervention has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1,900 baht/DALY with a 100% probability of a result less than a threshold for very cost-effective interventions of one times GDP or 110,000 baht per DALY. Treating the most severe one third of patients with clozapine instead of risperidone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 320,000 baht/DALY with just over 50% probability of a result below three times GDP per capita.

CONCLUSIONS

There are good economic arguments to recommend generic risperidone as first line treatment in combination with family intervention. As the uncertainty interval indicates the addition of clozapine may be dominated and there are serious side effects, treating severe patients with clozapine is advisable only for patients who do not respond to risperidone and only in the presence of a stricter side effect monitoring system than currently exists.

Patient perspectives on antipsychotic treatments and their association with clinical outcomes

This analysis examined patient-reported attitudes toward antipsychotic medication and the relationship of these attitudes with clinical outcomes and pharmacotherapy adherence. The analysis included three randomized, double-blind studies in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition and randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine 5-20 mg/day or another antipsychotic (haloperidol 2-20 mg/day, risperidone 2-10 mg/day, or ziprasidone 80-160 mg/day). Patient-reported improvements were significantly greater for olanzapine (n = 488) versus other treatments (haloperidol n = 145, risperidone n = 158, or ziprasidone n = 271) on multiple Drug Attitude Inventory items. A positive attitude toward medication reported by patients was significantly associated with greater clinical improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and lower discontinuation rates. These results suggest that patients' perceptions of treatment benefits are associated with objective clinical measures, including reduction of symptom severity and lower discontinuation rates. Furthermore, olanzapine may be associated with more positive treatment attitudes. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of reasons for treatment adherence from patients' own perspectives.

Pediatric uptake of a newly available antipsychotic medication

OBJECTIVE

The uptake of new antipsychotic medications among children has not been studied adequately. Although ziprasidone received Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of psychotic disorders among children in June 2009, it first became available for off-label use by children in 2001 and presented an excellent case study for off-label market entry. The objective of this study was to determine the pattern of initiation and switching for off-label use of ziprasidone among Michigan children who were insured by Medicaid in the first year that ziprasidone was available.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study by using Michigan Medicaid data for patients who were aged <21 years and had 2 years of continuous enrollment and at least 1 prescription for ziprasidone in the first year the medication was available. The main outcome measures were proportion of children prescribed ziprasidone as their first antipsychotic, with evidence of treatment resistance, and by a psychiatrist.

RESULTS

In the first year, 292 individuals who met criteria were prescribed ziprasidone. Approximately 53% had a diagnosis of psychosis. Explosive personality disorder and oppositional defiant disorder were the next most common diagnoses. For 33% of individuals, this was the first antipsychotic medication. Only 12% of individuals showed evidence of treatment resistance to other antipsychotic medications before switching to ziprasidone.

CONCLUSIONS

During the period when ziprasidone had no approved pediatric usages, a small percentage of patients who were prescribed ziprasidone showed evidence of treatment resistance, the primary expected indication. Some prescribing for ziprasidone in the first year in this population could be considered inappropriate considering what was known about the safety and efficacy of ziprasidone in children and adolescents at the time. "Fail first" and prior authorization policies may be appropriate in the first year a medication is available so as to protect children from potential serious harm.

Antipsychotic switching: results from a one-year prospective, observational study of patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The Health Outcomes of a Canadian Community Cohort (HOCCC) study is a 1-year prospective observational study of outpatients with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorders. The purpose of the study was to compare effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment as measured by 1-year treatment completion rates.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients (N = 929) were enrolled if in the course of usual clinical practice they switched to a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA). Observational data were collected for up to 1 year. The primary analysis compared 1-year treatment-completion rates for the olanzapine cohort with the other SGA cohort (quetiapine, risperidone, clozapine), using a chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Of 929 patients enrolled, 64.8% (516/796) of evaluable patients completed 1 year of treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of treatment completers between the olanzapine cohort (67.4%, 256/380) and the other SGA cohort (62.5%, 260/416). Treatment-completion rates were risperidone 62.0% (127/205), quetiapine 63.7% (123/193) and clozapine 55.6% (10/18). Antipsychotic polypharmacy was common. Patients treated with olanzapine or risperidone had significantly higher increases in BMI than quetiapine-treated patients. There were no major differences between olanzapine monotherapy and pooled other SGA monotherapy groups in status of extrapyramidal symptoms from baseline to endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine and other SGAs exhibited similar rates of 1-year treatment completion. Further study of medication combinations is needed, given their perceived clinical value, and the high frequency of antipsychotic polypharmacy in clinical practice.

LIMITATIONS

As most patients received several psychotropics and power was reduced in monotherapy analyses, comparisons between cohorts must be interpreted cautiously. Comparisons between individual antipsychotics were post hoc and not powered a priori. Accuracy and completeness of adverse event information for drugs other than olanzapine is limited.

Effects and side effects of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia: pros and cons of available self-rating scales

INTRODUCTION

To support clinical practice as well as clinical research, self-rating scales have been developed to evaluate the effects and side effects of antipsychotic treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the psychometric properties and other characteristics of frequently used self-rating scales, and also to study their relationship to subjective quality of life.

METHOD

Four self-rating scales designed to evaluate the treatment effects of antipsychotics were identified through a MEDLINE and cross-references search: The Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10), The Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS), Subjective Well-being to Neuroleptics (SWN) and the recently developed Subjects' Reaction to Antipsychotics questionnaire (SRA). Three hundred and twenty patients with schizophrenia who were treated with antipsychotics completed these questionnaires, including a quality of life instrument, the WHO-QoLBREF.

RESULTS

The self-rating scales differed in scope, number of items and subscales (total and subscale scores), but showed an acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach's alphas varying between .64 and .93) except for the DAI-10 (.52), and all were easy to complete (in less than 20 min). They did not strongly correlate with each other, except for the LUNSERS and SRA undesired experiences subscale (r=.68, p<.01). All correlations with quality of life were statistically significant, but were especially so for the SWN (.78, p<.01).

CONCLUSION

Clinicians interested in the experience of the effects and side effects of antipsychotic medication in their patients are well advised to carefully consider the pros and cons of the available rating scales. They differ with respect to their internal reliability, concurrent and conceptual validity, as well as with respect to desired and undesired effects, aspects of quality of life, and attribution to medication. The choice also depends on its intended use, whether in clinical practice or in research or in both.

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) and continuous antipsychotic treatment: 3-year results from the Schizophrenia Health Outcomes (SOHO) study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the association between continuous antipsychotic use and health-related quality of life (HRQL) 3-year change in the European Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (EU-SOHO) study.

METHODS

EU-SOHO is an observational study of outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia in an outpatient setting. HRQL was assessed at study entry and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). UK population time trade-off (TTO) tariffs were applied to the self-rated EQ-5D health states to calculate HRQL ratings (0 = death, 1 = best). An epoch analysis approach was used as a conceptual framework to analyze the longitudinal data. Follow-up was divided into epochs or periods of continuous treatment. When a patient changed antipsychotic treatment, he or she was considered to have a new observation. Multilevel models were employed to evaluate the association of HRQL with medication and other clinical and sociodemographic variables for each epoch. A total of 9340 patients were analyzed (42.1% women; mean age 40 years).

RESULTS

Mean EQ-5D scores increased over time; the largest improvement occurred in the first 6 months (mean increase of 0.19). Longer duration of illness and older age at first treatment were associated with worse baseline EQ-5D scores. Improvements in EQ-5D scores were greater for more socially active patients or those in paid employment. Few significant differences were found between antipsychotic medications. Olanzapine and clozapine were associated with higher HRQL increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous antipsychotic treatment is associated with important HRQL benefits at 3 years, most of which occurs during the first 6 months. Although some medications are associated with better HRQL outcomes, differences are small.

Stability of medication in early psychosis: a comparison between second-generation and low-dose first-generation antipsychotics

AIM

This naturalistic study aims to compare discontinuation rates for low-dose first-generation versus second-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychotic patients.

METHODS

The prescription of antipsychotic medication in 301 consecutively admitted patients with first-episode psychosis from four catchment areas is described. For the first year of inclusion a first-generation antipsychotic in low dose was recommended as the first medication. From the second year a second-generation antipsychotic was recommended as first choice. Switching was allowed when any drug was judged to be ineffective or to have serious side-effects. Switching during the first 2 years after inclusion is described.

RESULTS

Switching from a low-dose first-generation antipsychotic was more frequent than from a second-generation antipsychotic (90.7 vs. 58.4%). Lack of therapeutic effect and side-effects were the more frequently recorded reasons for changing in the first-generation group. Akathisia, parkinsonism, dyskinesias, dystonia and dysphoria were more often reported in patients on first-generation drugs. Weight gain and sedation were more often reported in patients on second-generation drugs.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest a better adherence to and tolerability for second-generation antipsychotics than for low-dose first-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis.

The effect of antipsychotic medication on sexual function and serum prolactin levels in community-treated schizophrenic patients: results from the Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole (STAR) study (NCT00237913)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia in a community based study on sexual function and prolactin levels comparing the use of aripiprazole and standard of care (SOC), which was a limited choice of three widely used and available antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone) (The Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole [STAR] study [NCT00237913]).

METHOD

This open-label, 26-week, multi-centre, randomised study compared aripiprazole to SOC (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone) in patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria). The primary effectiveness variable was the mean total score of the Investigator Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ) at Week 26. The outcome research variables included the Arizona Sexual Experience scale (ASEX). This along with the data collected on serum prolactin levels at week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 26 will be the focus of this paper.

RESULTS

A total of 555 patients were randomised to receive aripiprazole (n = 284) or SOC (n = 271). Both treatment groups experienced improvements in sexual function from baseline ASEX assessments. However at 8 weeks the aripiprazole treatment group reported significantly greater improvement compared with the SOC group (p = 0.007; OC). Although baseline mean serum prolactin levels were similar in the two treatment groups (43.4 mg/dL in the aripiprazole group and 42.3 mg/dL in the SOC group, p = NS) at Week 26 OC, mean decreases in serum prolactin were 34.2 mg/dL in the aripiprazole group, compared with 13.3 mg/dL in the SOC group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that aripiprazole has the potential to reduce sexual dysfunction, which in turn might improve patient compliance.

Correlations of attitudes toward antipsychotic drugs with insight and objective psychopathology in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the relationships between attitudes toward antipsychotics, insight, and other clinical variables in stable schizophrenia.

METHODS

Fifty Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision-(DSM-IV-TR)-diagnosed schizophrenic outpatients were evaluated through a psychiatric assessment. Drug attitudes were measured using the Drug Attitude Inventory and insight using the Scale for the Assessment of Unawareness of Mental Disorder. Differences between patients taking first- or second-generation antipsychotics were investigated.

RESULTS

Lack of insight, more severe scores on the positive and general psychopathology subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and later age at onset of schizophrenia correlated with worse global medication attitude. The multiple regression analysis revealed that unawareness of the need of treatment predicted poorer drug global attitude (R(2) = 0.312). Patients taking second-generation antipsychotics showed lower negative attitudes and better global drug attitudes than patients treated with neuroleptics.

CONCLUSION

The impact of the awareness of the need for treatment on global medication attitude needs to be a main focus of interventions targeting compliance.

New generation antipsychotic drugs and compliance behaviour

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antipsychotic therapy has been eclipsed by high rates of noncompliance; the problem was attributed to a lack of efficacy and the burden of side effects of neuroleptics. This review sought to examine whether the arrival of second generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs with low side-effect liability and improved efficacy has helped to positively reinforce compliance behaviour among people treated for schizophrenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of studies that systematically examined compliance behaviour and its determinants during antipsychotic drug therapy is disappointingly low. A review of relevant clinical trials, drug dispensation databases and observational studies yielded equivocal results. The data have failed to substantiate the notion that novel antipsychotic drug use leads to improved medication compliance and favourable clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY

A decade of clinical experience and research indicates that compliance behaviour has only marginally improved since the introduction of second generation antipsychotic drugs. Noncompliance in schizophrenia is a complex maladaptive pattern of behaviour determined by personal beliefs, illness-related factors, social attributes and health system variables. The reinforcing value of antipsychotic drugs may be less relevant in enhancing treatment compliance and influencing the natural history of schizophrenia.

Cost-effectiveness of antipsychotics for outpatients with chronic schizophrenia

AIMS

The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments for outpatients with chronic schizophrenia from the healthcare payer's perspective.

METHODS

Decision analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the following antipsychotic drugs: amisulpride, aripiprazole, haloperidol (oral formulation), haloperidol (depot formulation), olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone (oral formulation), risperidone (depot formulation) and ziprazidone. Clinical and economic outcomes were modelled over 1-year time horizon. Effectiveness was measured as a percentage of patients in remission. Clinical parameters used in the model included compliance rates, rehospitalisation rates for compliant and non-compliant patients, duration and frequency of hospitalisation, and adverse event rates. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The most effective treatment was treatment with olanzapine where 64.1% of patients remained in remission. The least effective treatment was treatment with quetiapine where 32.7% of patients remained in remission. Overall costs ranged from 3,726.78 Euro for haloperidol to 8,157.03 Euro for risperidone in depot formulation. Inpatient costs represented the major part of costs for most of antipsychotic drugs. Typical antipsychotic drugs had substantially smaller outpatient costs (6.5%) compared with atypical antipsychotics (37.9%). In the base case scenario the non-dominated treatment strategies were haloperidol, haloperidol decanoate and olanzapine. Additionally, risperidone can also be considered to be part of the efficient frontier based on the sensitivity analysis results.

CONCLUSION

Among second-generation antipsychotics, which have a better safety profile than first-generation antipsychotics, olanzapine and risperidone showed to be the most cost-effective treatment strategies for outpatient treatment of chronic schizophrenia.

Quality of life in schizophrenic patients

In the last decades, there has been increased interest in the field of quality of life in mental disorders in general, and particularly in schizophrenia. In addition, the appearance of the atypical antipsychotic drugs (amisul pride, aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) with different therapeutic and side-effect profiles, has promoted a greater interest in assessing the quality of life of schizophrenic patients. In this paper we will briefly summarize the difficulties in assessing quality of life in schizophrenic patients, as well as the results concerning their quality of life and the influence of psychopathology, especially negative and depressive symptoms, on it. We will also review data from recent clinical trials showing the impact of antipsychotic treatments and their side effects upon quality of life.

The stable patient with schizophrenia--from antipsychotic effectiveness to adherence

Long-term treatment of stable schizophrenia focuses on treatment effectiveness, addressing direct efficacy plus treatment adherence, treatment burden, and impact on factors such as weight gain. With the introduction of atypical antipsychotics such as aripiprazole, reduced side effects may lead to improved long-term treatment. The Clinical Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study where 1500 patients were randomised to atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone), or the typical antipsychotic drug perphenazine showed high discontinuation rates of 74% after 18 months, but extrapyramidal side effects were lower after atypical antipsychotic treatment compared with perphenazine. Twenty-six weeks of aripiprazole treatment, assessed in 284 patients in the Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole (STAR) showed that aripiprazole had similar discontinuation rates to the atypical antipsychotics standard of care. In the CATIE study, weight gain was common during treatment. In contrast, STAR demonstrated a favourable weight profile for aripiprazole, with a mean weight loss of 0.41 kg. Results from these naturalistic trials help define the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for long-term treatment.

Quality of life in schizophrenia on conventional versus atypical antipsychotic medication: a comparative cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Atypical antipsychotic drugs, with superior tolerability and possibly superior efficacy, were expected to give schizophrenia patients better quality of life (QOL) than conventional treatment. Research findings are equivocal.

METHOD

We evaluated QOL using three subjective measures--Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI); Sickness Impact Profile (SIP); Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS)--in 126 routinely seen patients whose treatment was stable for six months, regardless of co-morbidity, current clinical status and concomitant medications. Severity of disorder was assessed with the Global Assessment Schedule (GAS).

RESULTS

Fifty patients were on conventional treatment and 76 on atypical treatment. Atypical patients were more likely to be abusing substances (p = 0.02) and living independently (p = 0.00). Conventionally treated patients were older than atypically treated patients. Conventionally treated patients suffered schizophrenia almost twice as long as atypically treated patients. Atypically treated patients enjoyed substantially better quality of life than conventionally treated patients on all measures. The effects of confounding variables, i.e. age, duration, accommodation, co-morbid substance misuse and time spent in hospital, were evaluated with the General Linear Model. This confirmed the status of drug treatment as the primary predictor of all aspects of QOL.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that quality of life is genuinely superior on atypical treatment even allowing for the confounding effects of differential prescribing habits: atypical treatment tends to be reserved for younger, less seriously ill patients. There is no scientific or clinical rationale to support this practice.

Effectiveness and safety of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among Asian patients switching from conventional antipsychotics

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate, in a clinical practice setting, the effectiveness of olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia among partially-responding, symptomatic Asian patients who switch from conventional antipsychotic treatment, (2) to assess the safety of olanzapine and (3) to assess the change in quality of life in Asian patients with schizophrenia who switch to olanzapine.

METHODS

Effectiveness, safety and quality of life were assessed in outpatients with schizophrenia (n=1267) who lacked symptomatic control with conventional antipsychotics and were switched to olanzapine therapy. Data for this prospective, observational study were collected for 12 months from Asian patients in China, Hong Kong, the Philippines, South Korea and Taiwan.

RESULTS

Significant clinical improvements (P<0.05) were observed following 12 months of olanzapine treatment and 87.3% of the subjects responded to treatment at endpoint (i.e. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Total score reduced by > or =30% relative to baseline; last observation carried forward). Abnormal involuntary movements (mean change in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale: -3.20, P<0.001) and quality of life were significantly improved in patients treated with olanzapine. However, some patients experienced significant weight gain (3.60+/-4.50 kg, P<0.001) with olanzapine treatment, relative to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that switching to olanzapine may be effective in improving symptoms, may be well-tolerated and may improve the quality of life in Asian patients who are only partially responsive to treatment with conventional antipsychotics. The pragmatic design and naturalistic setting of this large study make the findings relevant for treating patients from some Asian countries in routine clinical practice.

Effects of switching from conventional antipsychotics to risperidone in Japanese patients with chronic schizophrenia

Atypical antipsychotics are rapidly evolving to become the standard pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia; however, the trend of switching to such drugs is not necessarily progressing quickly in East Asia. This might be due to the scarcity of evidence for the efficacy of switching from conventional to atypical antipsychotics, which prompted the authors to examine effects of switching from conventional antipsychotics to an atypical drug, risperidone, in Japanese patients. Fifty patients with chronic schizophrenia completed the study in which combination therapy with other antipsychotics was allowed if monotherapy with risperidone was not tolerated. Symptoms were assessed with the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS). Switching to monotherapy was achieved in 34 patients (68%). The number of antipsychotics prescribed to each patient was reduced (from 2.1 to 1.4 drugs; P < 0.001) and the use of antiparkinsonian drugs decreased (P < 0.001). The mean BPRS score was also reduced 6 months after initiation of the switch (P < 0.001). Failure in switching to monotherapy was associated with higher dosage of antipsychotics at baseline. Switching from conventional antipsychotics to risperidone reduced schizophrenia symptoms, antiparkinsonian medication, and polypharmacy. However, a portion of patients, particularly those who receive an excessive dosage of antipsychotics, might not tolerate such switching.

Randomized, double-blind 6-month comparison of olanzapine and quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with prominent negative symptoms and poor functioning

This study compared the effects of olanzapine (OLZ) with those of quetiapine (QUE) for improving negative symptoms in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had prominent negative symptoms and marked deficits in social or occupational functioning. In this 6-month, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial, patients were randomized to treatment with OLZ (n = 171, 10-20 mg/d) or QUE (n = 175, 300-700 mg/d). Patients were treated at community mental health centers and assigned case managers who developed individualized psychosocial treatment plans. The primary efficacy measure was the reduction in negative symptoms using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Secondary measures assessed changes in functioning, psychopathology, and treatment tolerability. Treatment with OLZ or QUE led to a significant reduction in negative symptoms, with no between-group difference (P = 0.09). Both treatment groups also showed significant improvement on most efficacy measures. Olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement on positive symptoms and on several measures of functioning including Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, Quality of Life Instrumental Role domain, and level of effort in psychosocial or occupational rehabilitation programs. Significantly more OLZ-treated patients completed the study (52.6% OLZ, 37.7% QUE, P = 0.007). Treatment differences in safety were relatively small and not thought to be clinically relevant. Patients with schizophrenia who manifest prominent negative symptoms and marked functional deficits demonstrated significant improvement in negative symptoms after treatment with OLZ or QUE. Greater improvement in positive symptoms and a greater study completion rate may hold relevance to enhanced functional outcomes observed after OLZ therapy.

The effect of perospirone on auditory P300 in schizophrenia: a preliminary study

The present study was performed to determine the effect of perospirone, a novel antipsychotic drug with D(2)/5-HT(2A) antagonist and partial 5-HT(1A) agonist properties, on auditory P300 in eight patients with chronic schizophrenia. Switching to an equivalent dose of perospirone from prior antipsychotic medication was associated with a significant improvement in the negative symptoms of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS). The change in P300 amplitude following a switch to perospirone correlated significantly with the improvement of general psychopathology symptoms, as well as with the change in scores on items of delusions, hallucinatory behavior, emotional withdrawal, depression, poor attention, and disturbance of volition. These results suggest that clinical improvement in response to perospirone in some patients may, at least in part, be mediated through cognitive change indexed by P300 in chronic schizophrenia.

Evaluation of factors influencing medication compliance in inpatient treatment of psychotic disorders

RATIONALE

Short- and long-term compliance to prescribed antipsychotic drugs is of particular concern in regard to medication choice and treatment outcome in the care of psychotic disorders.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated patient-related and treatment-related factors associated with medication compliance in inpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder.

METHODS

Within a naturalistic study in seven psychiatric hospitals, individuals with a psychotic disorder were assessed weekly on mental state, social functioning, side effects, and medication compliance. Logistic regression analyses were computed to assess patient and clinical predictors of medication compliance.

RESULTS

We found a significant association between medication compliance and substance abuse (OR 0.52, CI 0.32-0.85), involuntary admission (OR 0.60, CI 0.41-0.89), history of aggressive behavior (OR 0.57, CI 0.38-0.85), and no school graduation (OR 0.59, CI 0.41-0.86). Individuals with pronounced paranoid or negative symptoms were also less compliant in taking their prescribed medication. There was no association between the initial inpatient antipsychotic medication regime and patients' compliance. Individuals who switched from a typical to an atypical antipsychotic drug were more compliant than those with their typical antipsychotic drug maintained. Those with higher medication compliance showed significantly greater improvement of their psychiatric symptoms during the inpatient stay.

CONCLUSION

Patient-related in addition to disease-related factors may strongly influence medication compliance. Besides more compliance with atypicals supposed by the literature, there may be a higher propensity for atypical drugs to be prescribed to those assumed to be more compliant.

The impact of subjective well-being under neuroleptic treatment on compliance and remission

The patients' perspective of antipsychotic treatment was largely neglected for a long period. It has only been during the last 10 years, with the development of atypical antipsychotics, that scientific interest in this issue has markedly increased. Numerous studies have shown that the majority of schizophrenic patients are able to fill out a self-rating scale in a meaningful way, and several self-report scales with sufficient internal consistency and good construct validity have been developed. The effects of antipsychotic treatment on psychopathology and on subjective well-being (SW) are not strongly related; the perspectives of the patient and his/her psychiatrist markedly differ. Recent research indicates that SW/quality of life, much more improved by atypical than by typical antipsychotics, has a strong impact on compliance, as well as on the chance of achieving remission. The data strongly suggest that a systematic evaluation of the patient's perspective of antipsychotic treatment is meaningful and necessary to increase compliance, functional outcome, and long-term prognosis.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Correlates of subjective and functional outcomes in outpatient clinic attendees with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Outcome in schizophrenia is multidimensional and, thus, consists of clinical,humanitarian, rehabilitative and cost domains. Accordingly, recovery is conceptualized as the ability to function in the community, socially and vocationally, as well as being relatively free of disease-related psychopathology. The present cross-sectional study examined the relationship of premorbid functioning, psychopathology, insight, attitudes toward medication and side-effects, as well as sociodemographic factors with treatment outcomes in terms of quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial functioning among 60 regular attendees of a specialized schizophrenia outpatient clinic. Both insight into the illness as well as attitudes toward treatment indicated satisfactory compliance. Premorbid school and social functioning were positively correlated with actual employment status, and premorbid social functioning was further positively correlated with QOL and global functioning. Attitudes toward treatment were positively associated with global QOL, and with the patients' living situation. Both positive and negative symptoms as well as asthenia were negatively associated with QOL, while cognitive symptoms negatively influenced occupational functioning. Older patients lived independently and/or in a partnership more often, but had a lesser likelihood of competitive employment. Our observations suggest that subjective and functional outcomes in highly compliant patients are mainly predicted by psychopathological symptoms and unchangeable sociodemographic variables.

Perospirone in the treatment of schizophrenia: effect on verbal memory organization

The present study was performed to determine if perospirone, a novel antipsychotic drug with D2/5-HT2A antagonist and partial 5-HT1A agonist properties, would improve memory organization in twelve patients with chronic schizophrenia. Switching to equivalent dose of perospirone from prior antipsychotic medication was associated with a significant improvement in indices of verbal memory organization of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Negative symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects were also ameliorated after switching to perospirone. The distinct cognitive enhancement profile of perospirone may be attributable to its partial 5-HT1A agonist action.

Subjective response to clozapine and risperidone treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia

The purpose of the present study was to compare the subjective response and attitude towards antipsychotic treatment between schizophrenic patients receiving clozapine and those receiving risperidone. Ninety-four outpatients who had been on a stable drug dosage were evaluated (clozapine group: n=57, mean dose=254.1 mg/day; risperidone group: n=37, mean dose=3.0 mg/day). Subjective response to antipsychotic treatment was assessed using the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). The two treatment groups had a positive total mean score, indicating that both groups had a positive subjective view of drug treatment. The proportion of subjects who had a positive total score was not different between the two groups. In subscale scores, multivariate analysis revealed that clozapine group tended to have a higher score on the subjective positive response subscale (P=0.06). The scores of subjective negative response or attitude to medication subscales were not different between groups. In conclusion, there was no marked difference between stabilized outpatients taking clozapine and risperidone in terms of subjective response and attitude towards antipsychotic treatment. Considering that subjects treated with clozapine were treatment resistant patients, equal DAI score might indicate a more favorable subjective experience of clozapine. Further prospective studies on subjective response to various atypical agents are required to obtain valuable insight into how best to use these drugs from the patient's perspective.

Patterns of prescription of four major antipsychotics: a retrospective study based on medical records of psychiatric inpatients

PURPOSE

(1) To identify factors associated with the choice among the three atypical antipsychotics available in France (amisulpride, olanzapine, risperidone) and the typical antipsychotic of reference: (haloperidol), (2) to compare psychotropic co-prescription rates according to antipsychotic.

METHODS

All antipsychotic prescriptions including at least one of the four antipsychotics (n=421) for all inpatients (n=372) hospitalized 24 hours or more in the 6 months previous to the start of the study were included (2003). Data were obtained from medical records and psychiatrist interviews. Of the prescriptions, 13.3% included amisulpride, 39.4% olanzapine, 27.3% risperidone, and 20.0% haloperidol. Mean dosages were 142 mg (amisulpride), 15 mg (olanzapine), 4.5 mg (risperidone), and 19.5 mg (haloperidol).

RESULTS

Differences between antipsychotics were observed in relation to patients' age (younger patients prescribed amisulpride and olanzapine, p=0.04), diagnoses (affective disorders more frequently prescribed olanzapine and risperidone, p=0.005), and mode of hospitalization (admissions under constraint more frequently prescribed haloperidol, p<0.001). Antidepressant and anxiolytic-hypnotic co-prescription rates were lower with haloperidol than with atypicals. Mood-stabilizer co-prescription rates were higher for olanzapine and risperidone than for haloperidol and amisulpride. Anticholinergic co-prescription was higher with haloperidol than with atypicals (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Haloperidol was prescribed to a minority and targeted male patients hospitalized under constraint, using high dosages. Type and rate of co-prescriptions varied considerably between haloperidol and atypicals.

Patient satisfaction with psychotropic drugs: sensitivity to change and relationship to clinical status, quality-of-life, compliance and effectiveness of treatment. Results from a nation-wide 6-month prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To see if patient satisfaction with psychotropics (PSP) could be used as a patient-oriented outcome variable in the evaluation of PSP drugs in clinical epidemiological studies, relationships between PSP, clinical status, QoL, compliance and the type of antipsychotic were analyzed. Elements of validation of PSP were also assessed.

METHOD

In a 6-month prospective study, 933 schizophrenic outpatients with initiation or change to their antipsychotic treatment were enrolled. Psychiatrists completed five CGI-SCH scales (positive, negative, cognitive, depressive and global), hospitalization, compliance, and prescription variables. Patients completed PSP, EuroQoL scales, sexual function and compliance variables.

RESULTS

A satisfactory structural equation model was obtained showing significant relationships PSP/compliance (coef.=0.16), QoL/PSP (coef.=0.37), clinical status/QoL (coef.=0.61), clinical status/compliance (coef.=0.09). Patients receiving olanzapine were more satisfied than patients receiving other atypicals (coef.=012) and had better clinical status than patients treated with typicals (coef.=0.08). Evolution of PSP was related to clinical status, QoL, and continuation of treatment (all P<001). Sensitivity to change of PSP was moderate (effect size=0.2).

CONCLUSION

PSP produced consistent results in relation to validated outcome variables. However, a single-item measure was not sufficiently sensitive to change. Multi-item questionnaires evaluating different dimensions are needed.

Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia who switched from haloperidol, olanzapine or risperidone

A post hoc analysis of the SPECTRUM trial was carried out to evaluate whether the improvements in efficacy and tolerability gained on switching to quetiapine occurred consistently for patients previously treated with either: haloperidol (n = 43); olanzapine (n = 66); or risperidone (n = 55) monotherapy. Patients were initiated with quetiapine to 400 mg/day over 7 days, and then flexibly dosed (300-750 mg/day) for 11 weeks. The mean (SD) modal dose of quetiapine was 501 (138) mg/day in the haloperidol subgroup, 472 (147) mg/day in the olanzapine subgroup and 485 (141) mg/day in the risperidone subgroup at the study endpoint. Switching to quetiapine induced significant improvements from baseline in PANSS scores, with least square mean changes in total scores of -32.5, -15.4, and -18.5 for patients previously treated with haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, (all p < 0.001 vs baseline). Significant improvements were also noted in CDSS scores, particularly for patients clinically depressed at baseline (all p < 0.001 vs baseline). There were significant reductions in EPS on the SAS and BAS for all subgroups (all p < 0.001 vs baseline). Switching to quetiapine produced efficacy and tolerability benefits regardless of whether their previous antipsychotic was haloperidol, olanzapine or risperidone.

First-episode schizophrenia: a focus on pharmacological treatment and safety considerations

Schizophrenia is a debilitating disorder, which is usually chronic, and is one of the most devastating medical illnesses. Early and appropriate treatment with antipsychotics is an important strategy for patients with first-episode schizophrenia. However, there are many possible safety issues for patients with schizophrenia that should be considered and properly addressed. Depressive symptoms and suicidal behaviour commonly occur in first-episode schizophrenic patients, and every effort should be made to treat and minimise these symptoms. There are also important issues and considerations in young and first-episode patients that should also be considered in the emergency treatment setting and for minimising medication nonadherence in this population. Most importantly, adverse effects should be considered, minimised and addressed. While first- and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) both appear to offer similar efficacy for amelioration of positive symptoms in first-episode patients, SGAs may offer better tolerability, specifically regarding extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and tardive dyskinesia risk, and some prolactin-sparing benefits. However, these medications do cause a host of adverse effects, including weight gain, metabolic disturbances, corrected QT interval prolongation and prolactin-related adverse effects, which are important considerations relating to both the short- and long-term safety of patients with schizophrenia being treated with SGAs. Clozapine and olanzapine are most likely to cause weight gain and metabolic effects, while risperidone is more likely to cause EPS and prolactin elevations. Most antipsychotics should be used in low doses to minimise adverse effects and each medication should be optimised in a highly individualised way to maximise adherence and treatment outcomes and minimise tolerability and safety concerns. At some point in their lives, these patients will most probably experience periods of depression, suicidal behaviours, adverse effects and nonadherence, and every effort should be made to minimise or prevent these from occurring. Thus, safety concerns in this group of young patients, in the beginning of their first psychotic episode, are a major issue as they are starting a journey of antipsychotic treatment that is likely to last for the remainder of their lives.

Psychotropic combination in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To study adjunctive medications used with antipsychotic agents in schizophrenia via comparisons of antidepressant, anxiolytic and antiparkinsonian co-prescribing.

METHOD

In the context of a national naturalistic prospective observational study, a database containing all the prescriptions from 100 French psychiatrists during the year 2002 was analysed. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and age over 18. A log-linear model and generalised linear mixed models were used.

RESULTS

In all 5,257 prescriptions for 922 patients were analysed. The proportion of patients who were prescribed an antiparkinsonian drug was 32.9%. Amisulpride, haloperidol, phenothiazines with a sedative action and depot typical antipsychotics proved more likely to be prescribed with antiparkinsonians. The frequency of antidepressant and anxiolytic prescriptions was 51.2% and 52.3%, respectively. Associations between atypical antipsychotics (except clozapine) and antidepressants were positive while associations between typical antipsychotics and antidepressants were not. There were no differences among antipsychotics for the prescription of anxiolytics.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical antipsychotics can be expected to be less likely associated with antiparkinsonians. This result is indeed found for olanzapine, clozapine and to a limited extent for risperidone. Furthermore, a trend towards a positive association between atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants appears. In view of the antidepressive action of certain atypical antipsychotics, this result is surprising. The increase in the prescriptions of anxiolytics concerns all types of antipsychotics. In view of the increase in associated medications in schizophrenia and the difficulty of estimating it in randomised trials, this study underlines the contribution of naturalistic studies on this score.