Serum soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational cohort study

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 in sepsis, and current insights into clinical studies

Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) is a pattern recognition receptor and plays a critical role in the immune response. TREM-1 activation leads to the production and release of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, as well as its own expression and circulating levels of the cleaved soluble extracellular portion of TREM-1 (sTREM-1). Because patients with sepsis and septic shock show elevated sTREM-1 levels, TREM-1 has attracted attention as an important contributor to the inadequate immune response in this often-deadly condition. Since 2001, when the first blockade of TREM-1 in sepsis was performed, many potential TREM-1 inhibitors have been established in animal models. However, only one of them, nangibotide, has entered clinical trials, which have yielded promising data for future treatment of sepsis, septic shock, and other inflammatory disease such as COVID-19. This review discusses the TREM-1 pathway and important ligands, and highlights the development of novel inhibitors as well as their clinical potential for targeted treatment of various inflammatory conditions.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of TREM-1 inhibition with nangibotide in patients with COVID-19 receiving respiratory support: the ESSENTIAL randomised, double-blind trial

Background

Activation of the TREM-1 pathway is associated with outcome in life threatening COVID-19. Data suggest that modulation of this pathway with nangibotide, a TREM-1 modulator may improve survival in TREM-1 activated patients (identified using the biomarker sTREM-1).

Methods

Phase 2 double-blind randomized controlled trial assessing efficacy, safety, and optimum treatment population of nangibotide (1.0 mg/kg/h) compared to placebo. Patients aged 18–75 years were eligible within 7 days of SARS-CoV-2 documentation and within 48 h of the onset of invasive or non-invasive respiratory support because of COVID-19-related ARDS. Patients were included from September 2020 to April 2022, with a pause in recruitment between January and August 2021. Primary outcome was the improvement in clinical status defined by a seven-point ordinal scale in the overall population with a planned sensitivity analysis in the subgroup of patients with a sTREM-1 level above the median value at baseline (high sTREM-1 group). Secondary endpoints included safety and all-cause 28-day and day 60 mortality. The study was registered in EudraCT (2020-001504-42) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429334).

Findings

The study was stopped after 220 patients had been recruited. Of them, 219 were included in the mITT analysis. Nangibotide therapy was associated with an improved clinical status at day 28. Fifty-two (52.0%) of patients had improved in the placebo group compared to 77 (64.7%) of the nangibotide treated population, an odds ratio (95% CI) for improvement of 1.79 (1.02–3.14), p = 0.043. In the high sTREM-1 population, 18 (32.7%) of placebo patients had improved by day 28 compared to 26 (48.1%) of treated patients, an odds ratio (95% CI) of 2.17 (0.96–4.90), p = 0.063 was observed. In the overall population, 28 (28.0%) of placebo treated patients were not alive at the day 28 visit compared to 19 (16.0%) of nangibotide treated patients, an absolute improvement (95% CI) in all-cause mortality at day 28, adjusted for baseline clinical status of 12.1% (1.18–23.05). In the high sTREM-1 population (n = 109), 23 (41.8%) of patients in the placebo group and 12 (22.2%) of patients in the nangibotide group were not alive at day 28, an adjusted absolute reduction in mortality of 19.9% (2.78–36.98). The rate of treatment emergent adverse events was similar in both placebo and nangibotide treated patients.

Interpretation

Whilst the study was stopped early due to low recruitment rate, the ESSENTIAL study demonstrated that TREM-1 modulation with nangibotide is safe in COVID-19, and results in a consistent pattern of improved clinical status and mortality compared to placebo. The relationship between sTREM-1 and both risk of death and treatment response merits further evaluation of nangibotide using precision medicine approaches in life threatening viral pneumonitis.

Funding

The study was sponsored by Inotrem SA.

A systematic review of biomarkers multivariately associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome development and mortality

Background

Heterogeneity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could be reduced by identification of biomarker-based phenotypes. The set of ARDS biomarkers to prospectively define these phenotypes remains to be established.

Objective

To provide an overview of the biomarkers that were multivariately associated with ARDS development or mortality.

Data sources

We performed a systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar from inception until 6 March 2020.

Study selection

Studies assessing biomarkers for ARDS development in critically ill patients at risk for ARDS and mortality due to ARDS adjusted in multivariate analyses were included.

Data extraction and synthesis

We included 35 studies for ARDS development (10,667 patients at risk for ARDS) and 53 for ARDS mortality (15,344 patients with ARDS). These studies were too heterogeneous to be used in a meta-analysis, as time until outcome and the variables used in the multivariate analyses varied widely between studies. After qualitative inspection, high plasma levels of angiopoeitin-2 and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) were associated with an increased risk of ARDS development. None of the biomarkers (plasma angiopoeitin-2, C-reactive protein, interleukin-8, RAGE, surfactant protein D, and Von Willebrand factor) was clearly associated with mortality.

Conclusions

Biomarker data reporting and variables used in multivariate analyses differed greatly between studies. Angiopoeitin-2 and RAGE in plasma were positively associated with increased risk of ARDS development. None of the biomarkers independently predicted mortality. Therefore, we suggested to structurally investigate a combination of biomarkers and clinical parameters in order to find more homogeneous ARDS phenotypes.

PROSPERO identifier

PROSPERO, CRD42017078957

Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-1 (sTREM-1): a potential biomarker for the diagnosis of infectious diseases

Sensitive and useful biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of infectious diseases have been widely developed. An example of these biomarkers is triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-1 (TREM-1), which is a cell surface receptor expressed on monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils. TREM-1 amplifies inflammation by activating the TREM-1/DAP12 pathway. This pathway is triggered by the interaction of TREM-1 with ligands or stimulation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Consequently, pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines are secreted. Soluble TREM-1 (sTREM-1) is a special form of TREM-1 that can be directly tested in human body fluids and well-known biomarker for infectious diseases. sTREM-1 level can be potentially used for the early diagnosis and prognosis prediction of some infectious diseases, including infectious pleural effusion, lung infections, sepsis, bacterial meningitis, viral infections (e.g., Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever and dengue fever), fungal infections (e.g., Aspergillus infection), and burn-related infections. sTREM-1 is a more sensitive and specific biomarker than traditional indices, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels, for these infectious diseases. Therefore, sTREM-1 is a feasible biomarker for the targeted therapy and rapid and early diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Predictive value of plasma biomarkers for mortality and organ failure development in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the predictive value of 6 different biomarkers in the development of multiple-organ failure (MOF) and mortality in a contemporary prospective cohort of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

Patients with ARDS admitted to a tertiary referral center during an 8-month period were included. Plasma sample collection of 6 different biomarkers on days 1, 3, and 5 after ARDS onset was performed (von Willebrand factor, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, interleukin 8, receptor for advanced glycation end-products, and club cell secretory protein). Main outcomes included hospital mortality and development of MOF. Logistic regression models for MOF and mortality prediction were created including biomarkers levels and clinical predictors.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included in the study. Do-not-resuscitate status and McCabe score were independently associated with increased mortality. None of the 6 biomarkers measured at the time of ARDS diagnosis predicted hospital mortality. After adjustment for important clinical characteristics, elevated day-1 interleukin 8 levels were associated with the development of MOF.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of biomarkers did not improve mortality prediction in this cohort of ARDS. Association between elevated interleukin 8 levels and progression of organ failures suggests an important role of exaggerated inflammatory response in the development of MOF.

Plasma biomarkers for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis*

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have focused on biomarkers for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Although several biomarkers have been identified, their relative performance is unclear. We aim to provide a quantitative overview of plasma-derived biomarkers associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis or mortality.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (inception to January 2012) and personal databases.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies on plasma biomarkers associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis or mortality.

DATA EXTRACTION

Demographic variables, plasma levels of biomarker, statistical data, acute respiratory distress syndrome occurrence, and mortality rates were retrieved. The methodological quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies score. Clinical outcomes included 1) diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the at-risk population and 2) mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. For each biomarker, pooled odds ratios for clinical outcome were calculated by meta-analysis, and biomarkers were ranked according to pooled odds ratio.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifty-four studies appeared eligible for meta-analysis, together including 3,753 patients. We identified 20 biomarkers for diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the at-risk population and 19 biomarkers for mortality of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. The biomarkers most strongly associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis in the at-risk population, when increased, were Krebs von den Lungen-6 (odds ratio [95% CI], 6.1 [3.0-12.1]), lactate dehydrogenase (5.7 [1.7-19.1]), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (3.5 [1.7-7.2]), and von Willebrand Factor (3.1 [2.0-5.2]). The biomarkers most strongly associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality, when increased, were interleukin-4 (18.0 [6.0-54.2]), interleukin-2 (11.8 [4.3-32.2]), angiopoietin-2 (6.4 [1.3-30.4]), and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (5.1 [3.0-12.2]). Decreased levels of Protein C were associated with increased odds for acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides a unique ranking of plasma biomarkers according to their strength of association with acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis or acute respiratory distress syndrome mortality. The relative performance of biomarkers among studies shown in this ranking may help to improve acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis and outcome prediction.