Ultraviolet killing and photoreactivation of Phycomyces spores

Light reception of Phycomyces revisited: several white collar proteins confer blue- and red-light sensitivity and control dynamic range and adaptation

The giant-fruiting body, sporangiophore, of the fungus Phycomyces blakesleeanus grows toward near-UV/blue-light (phototropism). The blue-light photoreceptor, MadA, should contain FAD bound to the LOV domain, and forms a complex with MadB. Both proteins are homologs of white collar proteins WC-1 and WC-2 from the fungus Neurospora crassa and should be localized in nuclei, where they function as a light-sensitive transcription factor complex. The photoreceptor properties of two further Wc proteins, WcoA and WcoB, remain unclear because of lack of mutants. We propose that WcoA and/or WcoB play essential roles in photoreception by enlarging the dynamic range that help explain complex stimulus-response relationships. Even though red light does not elicit photo-movement or -differentiation in Phycomyces, it affects the effectiveness of blue light which indicates an underlying photochromic receptor. Protein sequence searches show that other fungal red-light receptors are absent in Phycomyces. The solution to the red-light riddle is thus sought in the ability of Wc complexes to generate after blue-light irradiation a neutral flavosemiquinone radical that absorbs red light and functions as primary photochemical signal. Phototropism requires Ras-GAP (MadC) as part of the signal transduction cascade and, we propose, to allocate photoreceptors in the plasmalemma of the growing zone, which allows for receptor dichroism, range adjustment and contrast recognition for spatial orientation. Phototropic signal chains must entail transduction networks between Wc receptors and small G-proteins and their associated Ras-GAP and Ras-GEF proteins. The interactions among these proteins should occur in trans-Golgi vesicles and the plasmalemma of the growing zone.

Photoreactivation of fungal spores in water following UV disinfection and their control using UV-based advanced oxidation processes

The occurrence of repair system in microorganisms after ultraviolet (UV)-induced damage to them evokes concern regarding the effectiveness of UV disinfection. Most studies focus on the repair of bacteria, but little research has been conducted on the repair of fungi in water. This study aimed to investigate the photoreactivation and dark repair properties of three dominant genera of fungal spores (Trichoderma harzianum, Aspergillus niger, and Penicillium polonicum) isolated from groundwater. UV-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (including UV/peroxymonosulfate and UV/hydrogen peroxide) were used to control their photoreactivation. The results demonstrated that the three genera of fungal spores inactivated by UV (254 nm) exhibited different levels of photoreactivation under UVA (365 nm) exposure, and the photoreactivation percentage showed that T. harzianum (51.35%) ＞A. niger (29.07%) ＞P. polonicum (9.01%). The photoreactivation process of fungal spores was well described by the first-order model. T. harzianum had lower photoreactivation percentage but a more rapid initial photoreactivation process than E. coli. Higher UV dosages significantly decreased the photoreactivation percentage of fungal spores. However, dark repair was insignificant following UV disinfection for all the three genera of fungal spores. After treatment by UV-based AOPs, the fungal spores exhibited the same photoreactivation trend as those treated by UV alone. However, both the maximum survival ratios and photoreactivation rate constants were reduced to varying degrees. This study revealed the photoreactivation rule of dominant genera of fungi isolated from groundwater following UV treatment alone and UV-based AOPs, which is effective for controlling fungi in water.

Fungal cryptochrome with DNA repair activity reveals an early stage in cryptochrome evolution

DASH (Drosophila, Arabidopsis, Synechocystis, Human)-type cryptochromes (cry-DASH) belong to a family of flavoproteins acting as repair enzymes for UV-B-induced DNA lesions (photolyases) or as UV-A/blue light photoreceptors (cryptochromes). They are present in plants, bacteria, various vertebrates, and fungi and were originally considered as sensory photoreceptors because of their incapability to repair cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) lesions in duplex DNA. However, cry-DASH can repair CPDs in single-stranded DNA, but their role in DNA repair in vivo remains to be clarified. The genome of the fungus Phycomyces blakesleeanus contains a single gene for a protein of the cryptochrome/photolyase family (CPF) encoding a cry-DASH, cryA, despite its ability to photoreactivate. Here, we show that cryA expression is induced by blue light in a Mad complex-dependent manner. Moreover, we demonstrate that CryA is capable of binding flavin (FAD) and methenyltetrahydrofolate (MTHF), fully complements the Escherichia coli photolyase mutant and repairs in vitro CPD lesions in single-stranded and double-stranded DNA with the same efficiency. These results support a role for Phycomyces cry-DASH as a photolyase and suggest a similar role for cry-DASH in mucoromycotina fungi.

Rapid blue light regulation of a Trichoderma harzianum photolyase gene

Photolyases and blue light receptors belong to a superfamily of flavoproteins that make use of blue and UVA light either to catalyze DNA repair or to control development. We have isolated a DNA photolyase gene (phr1) from Trichoderma harzianum, a common soil fungus that is of interest as a biocontrol agent against soil-borne plant pathogens and as a model for the study of light-dependent development. The sequence of phr1 is similar to other Class I Type I eukaryotic photolyase genes. Low fluences of blue light rapidly induced phr1 expression both in vegetative mycelia, which lack photoprotective pigments, and, to a greater extent, in conidiophores. Thus, visible light induces the development of pigmented, resistant spores as well as the expression of phr1, perhaps announcing in this way the imminent exposure to the more damaging short wavelengths of sunlight. Light induction of phr1 in non-sporulating mutants shows that a complete sporulation pathway is not required for photoregulation. The light requirements for photoinduction of phr1 were not altered in dimY photoperception mutants. This suggests that photoinduction of sporulation and of photolyase expression is distinct in their photoreceptor system or in the transduction of the blue light signal.