Dose requirements and recovery profile of an infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation

SUGAMMADEX versus neostigmine after ROCURONIUM continuous infusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Rapid neuromuscular block reversal at the end of major abdominal surgery is recommended to avoid any postoperative residual block. To date, no study has evaluated sugammadex performance after rocuronium administration in patients undergoing liver transplantation. This is a randomized controlled trial with the primary objective of assessing the neuromuscular transmission recovery time obtained with sugammadex versus neostigmine after rocuronium induced neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS

The TOF-Watch SX®, calibrated and linked to a portable computer equipped with TOF-Watch SX Monitor Software®, was used to monitor and record intraoperative neuromuscular block maintained with a continuous infusion of rocuronium. Anaesthetic management was standardized as per our institution's internal protocol. At the end of surgery, neuromuscular moderate block reversal was obtained by administration of 2 mg/kg of sugammadex or 50 mcg/kg of neostigmine (plus 10 mcg/kg of atropine).

RESULTS

Data from 41 patients undergoing liver transplantation were analysed. In this population, recovery from neuromuscular block was faster following sugammadex administration than neostigmine administration, with mean times±SD of 9.4 ± 4.6 min and 34.6 ± 24.9 min, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Sugammadex is able to reverse neuromuscular block maintained by rocuronium continuous infusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation. The mean reversal time obtained with sugammadex was significantly faster than that for neostigmine. It is important to note that the sugammadex recovery time in this population was found to be considerably longer than in other surgical settings, and should be considered in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02697929 (registered 3rd March 2016).

Split liver transplantation: What’s unique?

The intraoperative management of split liver transplantation (SLT) has some unique features as compared to routine whole liver transplantations. Only the liver has this special ability to regenerate that confers benefits in survival and quality of life for two instead of one by splitting livers. Primary graft dysfunction may result from small for size syndrome. Graft weight to recipient body weight ratio is significant for both trisegmental and hemiliver grafts. Intraoperative surgical techniques aim to reduce portal hyperperfusion and decrease venous portal pressure. Ischemic preconditioning can be instituted to protect against ischemic reperfusion injury which impacts graft regeneration. Advancement of the technique of SLT is essential as use of split cadaveric grafts expands the donor pool and potentially has an excellent future.

Criteria for immediate postoperative extubation in adult recipients following living-related liver transplantation with total intravenous anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether our criteria for immediate postoperative extubation predicts successful extubation in living-related liver transplantation of the right lobe, and to test the effects of our standardized anesthetic technique on the success of immediate postoperative extubation.

DESIGN

Open-label, descriptive study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

6 ASA physical status III and IV patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing living-related liver transplantation of the right lobe.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received a standardized anesthetic technique with propofol, remifentanil, and cisatracurium. They were extubated when they met our criteria for immediate postoperative extubation: good donor liver function, <10 U packed red blood cells administered, hemodynamic stability, and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient <200 mmHg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At the end of surgery, four of the six patients fulfilled our criteria for immediate postoperative extubation. They were uneventfully extubated rapidly after surgery and soon arrived in the intensive care unit. Their postoperative stay in the operating room was only 36 minutes (range: 30 to 42 min). No patient required reintubation in the operating room or the intensive care unit. They had no recorded hemodynamic or respiratory problems postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate extubation of selected living-related liver transplant recipients can be a safe procedure. Anesthetic management to immediate extubation seems appropriate and the derived guidelines appear acceptable.