Comparison of epidural morphine and oxycodone for pain after abdominal surgery

Oxycodone: A Current Perspective on Its Pharmacology, Abuse, and Pharmacotherapeutic Developments

Oxycodone, a semisynthetic derivative of naturally occurring thebaine, an opioid alkaloid, has been available for more than 100 years. Although thebaine cannot be used therapeutically due to the occurrence of convulsions at higher doses, it has been converted to a number of other widely used compounds that include naloxone, naltrexone, buprenorphine, and oxycodone. Despite the early identification of oxycodone, it was not until the 1990s that clinical studies began to explore its analgesic efficacy. These studies were followed by the pursuit of several preclinical studies to examine the analgesic effects and abuse liability of oxycodone in laboratory animals and the subjective effects in human volunteers. For a number of years oxycodone was at the forefront of the opioid crisis, playing a significant role in contributing to opioid misuse and abuse, with suggestions that it led to transitioning to other opioids. Several concerns were expressed as early as the 1940s that oxycodone had significant abuse potential similar to heroin and morphine. Both animal and human abuse liability studies have confirmed, and in some cases amplified, these early warnings. Despite sharing a similar structure with morphine and pharmacological actions also mediated by the μ-opioid receptor, there are several differences in the pharmacology and neurobiology of oxycodone. The data that have emerged from the many efforts to analyze the pharmacological and molecular mechanism of oxycodone have generated considerable insight into its many actions, reviewed here, which, in turn, have provided new information on opioid receptor pharmacology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Oxycodone, a μ-opioid receptor agonist, was synthesized in 1916 and introduced into clinical use in Germany in 1917. It has been studied extensively as a therapeutic analgesic for acute and chronic neuropathic pain as an alternative to morphine. Oxycodone emerged as a drug with widespread abuse. This article brings together an integrated, detailed review of the pharmacology of oxycodone, preclinical and clinical studies of pain and abuse, and recent advances to identify potential opioid analgesics without abuse liability.

Epidural Oxycodone for Acute Pain

Epidural analgesia is commonly used in labour analgesia and in postoperative pain after major surgery. It is highly effective in severe acute pain, has minimal effects on foetus and newborn, may reduce postoperative complications, and enhance patient satisfaction. In epidural analgesia, low concentrations of local anaesthetics are combined with opioids. Two opioids, morphine and sufentanil, have been approved for epidural use, but there is an interest in evaluating other opioids as well. Oxycodone is one of the most commonly used opioids in acute pain management. However, data on its use in epidural analgesia are sparse. In this narrative review, we describe the preclinical and clinical data on epidural oxycodone. Early data from the 1990s suggested that the epidural administration of oxycodone may not offer any meaningful benefits over intravenous administration, but more recent clinical data show that oxycodone has advantageous pharmacokinetics after epidural administration and that epidural administration is more efficacious than intravenous administration. Further studies are needed on the safety and efficacy of continuous epidural oxycodone administration and its use in epidural admixture.

Oxycodone in the Opioid Epidemic: High 'Liking', 'Wanting', and Abuse Liability

It is estimated that nearly a third of people who abuse drugs started with prescription opioid medicines. Approximately, 11.5 million Americans used prescription drugs recreationally in 2016, and in 2018, 46,802 Americans died as the result of an opioid overdose, including prescription opioids, heroin, and illicitly manufactured fentanyl (National Institutes on Drug Abuse (2020) Opioid Overdose Crisis. https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids/opioid-overdose-crisis . Accessed 06 June 2020). Yet physicians will continue to prescribe oral opioids for moderate-to-severe pain in the absence of alternative therapeutics, underscoring the importance in understanding how drug choice can influence detrimental outcomes. One of the opioid prescription medications that led to this crisis is oxycodone, where misuse of this drug has been rampant. Being one of the most highly prescribed opioid medications for treating moderate-to-severe pain as reflected in the skyrocketed increase in retail sales of 866% between 1997 and 2007, oxycodone was initially suggested to be less addictive than morphine. The false-claimed non-addictive formulation of oxycodone, OxyContin, further contributed to the opioid crisis. Abuse was often carried out by crushing the pills for immediate burst release, typically by nasal insufflation, or by liquefying the pills for intravenous injection. Here, we review oxycodone pharmacology and abuse liability as well as present the hypothesis that oxycodone may exhibit a unique pharmacology that contributes to its high likability and abuse susceptibility. We will discuss various mechanisms that likely contribute to the high abuse rate of oxycodone including clinical drug likability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, differences in its actions within mesolimbic reward circuity compared to other opioids, and the possibility of differential molecular and cellular receptor interactions that contribute to its selective effects. We will also discuss marketing strategies and drug difference that likely contributes to the oxycodone opioid use disorders and addiction.

Integrated Systems Analysis of Mixed Neuroglial Cultures Proteome Post Oxycodone Exposure

Opioid abuse has become a major public health crisis that affects millions of individuals across the globe. This widespread abuse of prescription opioids and dramatic increase in the availability of illicit opioids have created what is known as the opioid epidemic. Pregnant women are a particularly vulnerable group since they are prescribed for opioids such as morphine, buprenorphine, and methadone, all of which have been shown to cross the placenta and potentially impact the developing fetus. Limited information exists regarding the effect of oxycodone (oxy) on synaptic alterations. To fill this knowledge gap, we employed an integrated system approach to identify proteomic signatures and pathways impacted on mixed neuroglial cultures treated with oxy for 24 h. Differentially expressed proteins were mapped onto global canonical pathways using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), identifying enriched pathways associated with ephrin signaling, semaphorin signaling, synaptic long-term depression, endocannabinoid signaling, and opioid signaling. Further analysis by ClueGO identified that the dominant category of differentially expressed protein functions was associated with GDP binding. Since opioid receptors are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), these data indicate that oxy exposure perturbs key pathways associated with synaptic function.

Analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of epidural oxycodone in pain management after gynaecological laparoscopy-A randomised, double blind, active control, double-dummy clinical comparison with intravenous administration

AIMS

Early pain after laparoscopy is often severe. Oxycodone is a feasible analgesic option after laparoscopy, but there are sparse data on epidural administration. The aim was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of epidural oxycodone as a part of multimodal analgesia after gynaecological laparoscopy.

METHODS

Women (n = 60), aged 23-71 years, undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopy, were administrated either epidural oxycodone 0.1 mg kg^-1 and intravenous (i.v.) saline (EPI-group n = 31), or epidural saline and i.v. oxycodone 0.1 mg kg^-1 (IV-group = 29) in a randomised, double blind, active control, double dummy clinical trial. A pharmacokinetic model was developed using population modelling of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations obtained in these patients and data of 2 published studies. The primary outcome was the amount of i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia during the first 4 hours.

RESULTS

Twenty of the 31 patients in the EPI-group and 26 of the 29 patients in the IV-group needed i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia, P = .021. The median (interquartile range) number of fentanyl doses were 1.0 (1.0-3.0) in the EPI-group and 2.5 (1.0-4.0) doses in the IV-group, P = .008. Plasma concentrations were similar, but CSF concentrations were 100-fold higher in the EPI-group. The population model indicated that 60% of oxycodone injected into the epidural space enters into CSF and 40% is absorbed into the systemic circulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support superiority of epidural administration of oxycodone compared to i.v. administration during the first hours after laparoscopic surgery. This is likely to be based on enhanced permeation into the central nervous system after epidural administration.

Population pharmacokinetics of oxycodone in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid after epidural and intravenous administration

Objectives: To establish the first plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oxycodone population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model after epidural (EPI) and intravenous (IV) oxycodone administration. Methods: The study was conducted with 30 female subjects undergoing elective gynecological surgery with epidural analgesia. A parallel single dose of EPI oxycodone with IV placebo (EPI group; n = 18) or IV oxycodone with EPI placebo (IV group; n = 12) was administered. An epidural catheter for drug administration was placed at T12/L1 and a spinal catheter for CSF sampling at L3/4. Plasma and CSF for oxycodone analysis were frequently collected. A PopPK model was built using the NONMEM software package. Results: Plasma and CSF oxycodone concentrations were evaluated using separate central plasma and CSF compartments and separate peripheral plasma and CSF compartments. Epidural space served as a depot compartment with transfer to both the plasma and CSF central compartments. The population parameters for plasma clearance and apparent distribution volumes for central and peripheral compartments for plasma and CSF were 37.4 L/h, 90.2 L, 68.9 L, 0.035 L (fixed based on literature), and 0.039 L, respectively. Conclusion: A PopPK model was developed and found to precisely and accurately describe oxycodone time-concentration data in plasma and CSF.

The analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of epidural oxycodone after gynaecological laparotomy: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison with intravenous administration

AIM

The aim of the present study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of epidural and intravenous (i.v.) oxycodone at the same dose.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial, 30 women, aged 24-67 years, undergoing elective gynaecological laparotomy, were administrated either i.v. saline and epidural oxycodone 0.1 mg·kg^-1 (EPI group; n = 15) or i.v. oxycodone 0.1 mg·kg^-1 and epidural saline (IV group; n = 15). For multimodal analgesia, patients received i.v. paracetamol and dexketoprofen, and a triple-mixture epidural infusion after the first 4 h postoperatively. The primary outcome was the total dose of i.v. fentanyl for rescue analgesia during the first 4 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

All patients required fentanyl during the first 4 h. The median number of fentanyl doses were three (quartiles 1, 8) in the EPI group and seven (6, 9) in the IV group (mean difference 3.1; 95% confidence interval 0.9, 5.2; P = 0.01). After the first 4 h, the two groups needed a similar total dose of epidural infusion. Patient satisfaction was similarly high in both groups, and both administration routes were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the superiority of epidural oxycodone compared with that of i.v. administration in pain management after laparotomy.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of epidural oxycodone in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Oxycodone is poorly studied as an adjuvant to central blockades. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy and safety of oxycodone hydrochloride in epidural blockade among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 11 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system II/III, age range: 59-82 years), THA was conducted with an epidural blockade using 15 mL 0.25% bupivacaine (37.5 mg) with 5 mg oxycodone hydrochloride and sedation with propofol infusion at a dose of 3-5 mg/kg/h. After the surgery, patients received ketoprofen at a dose of 100 mg twice daily. In the first 24 hours postoperative period, pain was assessed by numerical rating scale at rest and on movement; adverse effects (AEs) were recorded; and plasma concentrations of oxycodone, noroxycodone, and bupivacaine were measured.

RESULTS

The administration of epidural oxycodone at a dose of 5 mg in patients undergoing THA provided analgesia for a mean time of 10.3±4.89 h. In one patient, mild pruritus was observed. Oxycodone did not evoke other AEs. Plasma concentrations of oxycodone while preserving analgesia were >2.9 ng/mL. Noroxycodone concentrations in plasma did not guarantee analgesic effect.

CONCLUSION

The administration of epidural oxycodone at a dose of 5 mg prolongs the analgesia period to ~10 hours in patients after THA. Oxycodone may evoke pruritus. A 5 mg dose of oxycodone hydrochloride used in an epidural blockade seems to be a safe drug in patients after THA.

Revisiting Oxycodone Analgesia: A Review and Hypothesis

Oxycodone, a semisynthetic opioid analgesic, is widely used in clinical practice. Oxycodone and morphine seem to be equally effective and equipotent; however, morphine is 10 times more potent than oxycodone when given epidurally. This article provides an updated review of the basic pharmacology of oxycodone with a special focus on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics properties. The controversy regarding oxycodone-mediated effects for visceral pain via agonism and the possible role of peripheral opioid analgesia are discussed in the present investigation in an attempt to propose a plausible explanation to the perplexing question of oxycodone analgesia.

Cytotoxicity of Oxycodone and Morphine in Human Neuroblastoma and Mouse Motoneuronal Cells: A Comparative Approach

Background and Objectives

Oxycodone is the mo st commonly used opioid for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. The peak cerebrospinal fluid concentration after epidural oxycodone was reported to be 300-fold greater (0.025 mM) than when administered intravenously after gynecologic surgery. Additionally, those patients administered epidural oxycodone had lower pain scores, needed less rescue analgesics and had fewer adverse effects compared with intravenous administration. However, oxycodone neurotoxicity requires evaluation before intrathecal implementation for routine clinical use.

Methods

We used two in vitro cell culture models to compare the cytotoxicity of oxycodone with that of morphine, and to study the mechanisms underlying toxicity. Human neuroblastoma cells and mouse motoneuronal cells were treated with increasing concentrations (0.0125–2 mM) of oxycodone or morphine, and were harvested at 24, 48 or 96 h. Cell cultures were evaluated with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and resazurin reduction assays.

Results

Both morphine and oxycodone decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner at concentrations between 0.5 and 2 mM. Morphine increased the number of apoptotic cells compared with oxycodone when assessed by flow cytometry, and transmission electron microscopy images revealed that exposure to both opioids evoked the appearance of numerous electron-dense, probable autophagic vacuoles in the cytoplasm of the cells.

Conclusions

Based on these results, it seems that the cytotoxicity of oxycodone in motoneuronal cells is similar to or less than that of morphine, and occurs only at concentrations above the peak clinical concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid after epidural administration.

Comparison of epidural oxycodone and epidural morphine for post-caesarean section analgesia: A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims:

Epidural morphine after caesarean section may cause moderate to severe pruritus in women. Epidural oxycodone has been shown in non-obstetric trials to reduce pruritus when compared to morphine. We hypothesised that epidural oxycodone may reduce pruritus after caesarean section.

Methods:

A randomised controlled trial was conducted in pregnant women at term who underwent caesarean section with combined spinal-epidural technique initiated with intrathecal fentanyl 15 μg. Women received either epidural morphine 3 mg or epidural oxycodone 3 mg via the epidural catheter after delivery. The primary outcome was the incidence of pruritus at 24 h after caesarean section. The secondary outcomes were the pruritus scores, treatment for post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pain scores and maternal satisfaction.

Results:

One hundred women were randomised (group oxycodone O = 50, morphine M = 50). There was no difference between Group O and M in the incidence of pruritus (n [%] 28 [56%] vs. 31 [62%], P = 0.68) and the worst pruritus scores (mean [standard deviation] 2.6 (2.8) vs. 3.3 [3.1], P = 0.23), respectively. Both groups had similar pain scores at rest (2.7 [2.3] vs. 2.0 [2.7], P = 0.16) and sitting up (5.0 [2.3] vs. 4.6 [2.4], P = 0.38) at 24 h. Pruritus scores were lower at 4–8, 8–12 and 12–24 h with oxycodone, but pain scores were higher. Both groups had a similar need for treatment of PONV and maternal satisfaction with analgesia.

Conclusion:

There was no difference in the incidence of pruritus at 24 h between epidural oxycodone and morphine. However, pruritus scores were lower with oxycodone between 4 and 24 h after surgery with higher pain scores in the same period.

Comparison of oxycodone and fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic gynecological surgery

BACKGROUND

Opioids are widely used in boluses and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain control. In this study, we compared the effects of oxycodone and fentanyl on postoperative pain in patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients undergoing elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopic myomectomy were randomly assigned to the administration of either fentanyl or oxycodone using IV-PCA (potency ratio 1 : 60). The cumulative dose administered in the patient-controlled mode during the initial 48 hours after the operation was measured. Patients were also assessed for postoperative pain severity, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in patient satisfaction with the analgesia during the postoperative period. Patients in the oxycodone group experienced significantly more dizziness compared to the fentanyl group. Patients in the oxycodone group showed significantly lower consumption of opioid in the patient-controlled mode (10.1 ± 8.5 ml vs. 16.6 ± 12.0 ml, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that oxycodone and fentanyl demonstrated similar effects, and therefore oxycodone may be a good alternative to fentanyl in postoperative pain management. Further studies in various clinical settings will be needed to determine the adequate potency ratio.

In vivo profiling of seven common opioids for antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression: no two opioids have the same profile

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

For patients experiencing inadequate analgesia and intolerable opioid-related side effects on one strong opioid analgesic, pain relief with acceptable tolerability is often achieved by rotation to a second strong opioid. These observations suggest subtle pharmacodynamic differences between opioids in vivo. This study in rats was designed to assess differences between opioids in their in vivo profiles.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Male Sprague Dawley rats were given single i.c.v. bolus doses of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), fentanyl, oxycodone, buprenorphine, DPDPE ([D-penicillamine(2,5) ]-enkephalin) or U69,593. Antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression were assessed using the warm water tail-flick test, the castor oil-induced diarrhoea test and whole body plethysmography respectively.

KEY RESULTS

These opioid agonists produced dose-dependent antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression. For antinociception, morphine, fentanyl and oxycodone were full agonists, buprenorphine and M6G were partial agonists, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 had low potency. For constipation, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, morphine produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive. For respiratory depression, morphine, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive. The respiratory depressant effects of fentanyl and oxycodone were of short duration, whereas morphine, M6G and buprenorphine evoked prolonged respiratory depression.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

For the seven opioids we assessed, no two had the same profile for evoking antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression, suggesting that these effects are differentially regulated. Our findings may explain the clinical success of 'opioid rotation'.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

Comparison of a drug versus money and drug versus drug self-administration choice procedure with oxycodone and morphine in opioid addicts

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effects of oral morphine (0, 45, 135 mg/70 kg) and oral oxycodone (0, 15, 45 mg/70 kg) on buprenorphine-maintained opioid addicts. As a 3: 1 morphine : oxycodone oral dose ratio yielded equivalent subjective and physiological effects in nondependent individuals, this ratio was used in the present study. Two self-administration laboratory procedures - that is, a drug versus money and a drug versus drug procedure - were assessed. Study participants (N=12) lived in the hospital and were maintained on 4 mg/day sublingual buprenorphine. When participants chose between drug and money, money was preferred over all drug doses; only high-dose oxycodone was self-administered more than placebo. When participants chose between drug and drug, both drugs were chosen more than placebo, high doses of each drug were chosen over low doses, and high-dose oxycodone was preferred over high-dose morphine. The subjective, performance-impairing, and miotic effects of high-dose oxycodone were generally greater than those of high-dose morphine. The study demonstrated that a 3: 1 oral dose ratio of morphine : oxycodone was not equipotent in buprenorphine-dependent individuals. Both self-administration procedures were effective for assessing the relative reinforcing effects of drugs; preference for one procedure should be driven by the specific research question of interest.

Morphine versus oxycodone analgesia after percutaneous kidney stone surgery: a randomised double blinded study

According to previous studies oxycodone might have some advantages over morphine in the treatment of visceral pain. This study investigated the opioid consumption (primary outcome), pain relief and side effects (secondary outcomes) of morphine versus oxycodone after percutaneous nephrolithotomy using a method where the somatic pain component was minimized. Forty-four adult patients were studied. The patients were randomised to receive either morphine or oxycodone intravenously as postoperative pain treatment. During the first 4 h after surgery the opioid consumption, pain scores and side effects (nausea, dizziness, sedation, respiratory effects and itching) were registered. The postoperative opioid consumption varied considerably between the patients but the mean opioid consumption in the morphine and oxycodone group was comparable (18.93 mg versus 16.15 mg, P = 0.7). Nausea was significantly less frequent with morphine (P = 0.03). In this study morphine and oxycodone produced similar analgesia the first 4 h after surgery but the frequency of nausea was significantly less patient-reported with morphine. The hypothesis that oxycodone would be superior in the treatment of visceral pain after percutaneous kidney stone operation was not confirmed.

Oxycodone combined with opioid receptor antagonists: efficacy and safety

INTRODUCTION

A mu receptor antagonist combined with oxycodone (OXY) may improve pain control, reduce physical tolerance and withdrawal, minimizing opioid-related bowel dysfunction and act as an abuse deterrent.

AREAS COVERED

The authors cover the use of OXY plus ultra-low-dose naltrexone for analgesia and the use of sustained-release OXY plus sustained-release naloxone to reduce the opioid bowel syndrome. The authors briefly describe the use of sustained-release OXY and naltrexone pellets as a drug abuse deterrent formulation. Combinations of ultra-low-dose naltrexone plus OXY have been in separate trials involved in patients with chronic pain from osteoarthritis and idiopathic low back pain. High attrition and marginal differences between ultra-low-dose naltrexone plus OXY and OXY led to discontinuation of development. Prolonged-release (PR) naloxone combined with PR OXY demonstrates a consistent reduction in opioid-related bowel dysfunction in multiple randomized controlled trials. However, gastrointestinal side effects, including diarrhea, were increased in several trials with the combination compared with PR OXY alone. Analgesia appeared to be maintained although non-inferiority to PR OXY is not formally established. There were flaws to trial design and safety monitoring. Naltrexone has been combined with OXY in individual pellets encased in a capsule. This combination has been reported in a Phase II trial and is presently undergoing Phase III studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the lack of efficacy the combination of altered low-dose naltrexone with oxycodone should cease in development. The combination of sustained release oxycodone plus naloxone reduces constipation with a consistent benefit. Safety has been suboptimally evaluated which is a concern. Although the drug is commercially available in several countries, ongoing safety monitoring particularly high doses would be important.

Role of oxycodone and oxycodone/naloxone in cancer pain management

Oxycodone is a valued opioid analgesic, which may be administered either as the first strong opioid or when other strong opioids are ineffective. In case of insufficient analgesia and/or intense adverse effects such as sedation, hallucinations and nausea/vomiting a switch from another opioid to oxycodone might be beneficial. Oxycodone is administered to opioid-naive patients with severe pain and to patients who were unsuccessfully treated with weak opioids, namely tramadol, codeine and dihydrocodeine. Oxycodone effective analgesia may be attributed to its affinity to μ and possibly κ opioid receptors, rapid penetration through the blood-brain barrier and higher concentrations in brain than in plasma. Oxycodone displays high bioavailability after oral administration and may be better than morphine in patients with renal impairment due to the decreased production of active metabolites. Recently an oral controlled-release oxycodone formulation was introduced in Poland. Another new product that was launched recently is a combination of prolonged-release oxycodone with prolonged-release naloxone (oxycodone/naloxone tablets). The aim of this review is to outline the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, drug interactions, dosing rules, adverse effects, equianalgesic dose ratio with other opioids and clinical studies of oxycodone in patients with cancer pain. The potential role of oxycodone/naloxone in chronic pain management and its impact on the bowel function is also discussed.

Genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions modulating CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities have a major effect on oxycodone analgesic efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The major drug-metabolizing enzymes for the oxidation of oxycodone are CYP2D6 and CYP3A. A high interindividual variability in the activity of these enzymes because of genetic polymorphisms and/or drug-drug interactions is well established. The possible role of an active metabolite in the pharmacodynamics of oxycodone has been questioned and the importance of CYP3A-mediated effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone has been poorly explored.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We conducted a randomized crossover (five arms) double-blind placebo-controlled study in 10 healthy volunteers genotyped for CYP2D6. Oral oxycodone (0.2 mg x kg(-1)) was given alone or after inhibition of CYP2D6 (with quinidine) and/or of CYP3A (with ketoconazole). Experimental pain (cold pressor test, electrical stimulation, thermode), pupil size, psychomotor effects and toxicity were assessed.

KEY RESULTS

CYP2D6 activity was correlated with oxycodone experimental pain assessment. CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers experienced increased pharmacodynamic effects, whereas cold pressor test and pupil size were unchanged in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, relative to extensive metabolizers. CYP2D6 blockade reduced subjective pain threshold (SPT) for oxycodone by 30% and the response was similar to placebo. CYP3A4 blockade had a major effect on all pharmacodynamic assessments and SPT increased by 15%. Oxymorphone C(max) was correlated with SPT assessment (rho(S)= 0.7) and the only independent positive predictor of SPT. Side-effects were observed after CYP3A4 blockade and/or in CYP2D6 ultra-rapid metabolizers.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The modulation of CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities had clear effects on oxycodone pharmacodynamics and these effects were dependent on CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism.

The effects of CYP2D6 and CYP3A activities on the pharmacokinetics of immediate release oxycodone

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is high interindividual variability in the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes catalysing the oxidation of oxycodone [cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 3A], due to genetic polymorphisms and/or drug-drug interactions. The effects of CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A activity modulation on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone remains poorly explored.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

A randomized crossover double-blind placebo-controlled study was performed with 10 healthy volunteers genotyped for CYP2D6 [six extensive (EM), two deficient (PM/IM) and two ultrarapid metabolizers (UM)]. The volunteers randomly received on five different occasions: oxycodone 0.2 mg x kg(-1) and placebo; oxycodone and quinidine (CYP2D6 inhibitor); oxycodone and ketoconazole (CYP3A inhibitor); oxycodone and quinidine+ketoconazole; placebo. Blood samples for plasma concentrations of oxycodone and metabolites (oxymorphone, noroxycodone and noroxymorphone) were collected for 24 h after dosing. Phenotyping for CYP2D6 (with dextromethorphan) and CYP3A (with midazolam) were assessed at each session.

KEY RESULTS

CYP2D6 activity was correlated with oxymorphone and noroxymorphone AUCs and C(max) (-0.71 < Spearman correlation coefficient rhos < -0.92). Oxymorphone C(max) was 62% and 75% lower in PM than EM and UM. Noroxymorphone C(max) reduction was even more pronounced (90%). In UM, oxymorphone and noroxymorphone concentrations increased whereas noroxycodone exposure was halved. Blocking CYP2D6 (with quinidine) reduced oxymorphone and noroxymorphone C(max) by 40% and 80%, and increased noroxycodone AUC(infinity) by 70%. Blocking CYP3A4 (with ketoconazole) tripled oxymorphone AUC(infinity) and reduced noroxycodone and noroxymorphone AUCs by 80%. Shunting to CYP2D6 pathway was observed after CYP3A4 inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Drug-drug interactions via CYP2D6 and CYP3A affected oxycodone pharmacokinetics and its magnitude depended on CYP2D6 genotype.

Does co-administration of paroxetine change oxycodone analgesia: An interaction study in chronic pain patients

Oxycodone is a strong opioid and it is increasingly used in the management of acute and chronic pain. The pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone are mainly mediated by the μ-opioid receptor. However, its affinity for the μ-opioid receptor is significantly lower compared with that of morphine and it has been suggested that active metabolites may play a role in oxycodone analgesia. Oxycodone is mainly metabolized by hepatic cytochrome (CYP) enzymes 2D6 and 3A4. Oxycodone is metabolized to oxymorphone, a potent μ-opioid receptor agonist by CYP2D6. However, CYP3A4 is quantitatively a more important metabolic pathway. Chronic pain patients often use multiple medications. Therefore it is important to understand how blocking or inducing these metabolic pathways may affect oxycodone induced analgesia. The aim of this study was to find out whether blocking CYP2D6 would decrease oxycodone induced analgesia in chronic pain patients.

The effects of the antidepressant paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, on the analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of oral oxycodone were studied in 20 chronic pain patients using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study design. Pain intensity and rescue analgesics were recorded daily, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone were studied on the 7th day of concomitant paroxetine (20 mg/day) or placebo administration. The patients were genotyped for CYP2D6, 3A4, 3A5 and ABCB1.

Paroxetine had significant effects on the metabolism of oxycodone but it had no statistically significant effect on oxycodone analgesia or use of morphine for rescue analgesia. Paroxetine increased the dose-adjusted mean AUC0–12h of oxycodone by 19% (−23 to 113%; P = 0.003), and that of noroxycodone by 100% (5–280%; P < 0.0001) but decreased the AUC0–12 h of oxymorphone by 67% (−100 to −22%; P < 0.0001) and that of noroxymorphone by 68% (−100 to −16%; P < 0.0001).

Adverse effects were also recorded in a pain diary for both 7-day periods (placebo/paroxetine). The most common adverse effects were drowsiness and nausea/vomiting. One patient out of four reported dizziness and headache during paroxetine co-administration, whereas no patient reported these during placebo administration (P = 0.0471) indicating that these adverse effects were due to paroxetine.

No statistically significant associations of the CYP2D6 or CYP3A4/5 genotype of the patients and the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone or its metabolites, extent of paroxetine–oxycodone interaction, or analgesic effects were observed probably due to the limited number of patients studied.

The results of this study strongly suggest that CYP2D6 inhibition does not significantly change oxycodone analgesia in chronic pain patients and that the analgesic activity of oxycodone is mainly due to the parent compound and that metabolites, e.g. oxymorphone, play an insignificant role. The clinical implication of these results is that induction of the metabolism of oxycodone may lead to inadequate analgesia while increased drug effects can be expected after addition of potent CYP3A4/5 inhibitors particularly if combined with CYP2D6 inhibitors or when administered to poor metabolizers of CYP2D6.

The effects of different analgesic regimens on transcutaneous CO2 after major surgery

Ventilatory impairment may be detected by a rise in transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels (PtcCO(2)). This observational study assessed the clinical utility of PtcCO(2) monitoring in the postoperative period, and quantified the effect of different peri-operative analgesic regimens on postoperative respiratory function. Following pre-operative baseline PtcCO(2) recording, continuous PtcCO(2) monitoring was performed in 30 patients after major colorectal surgery for up to 24 h. Mean postoperative values of PtcCO(2) were 1.3 kPa (95% CI 1.0-1.5) higher than pre-operative values (p < 0.001). Patients receiving intravenous opioid patient controlled analgesia had a significantly higher elevation in postoperative PtcCO(2) compared to patients receiving epidural infusion analgesia, 1.8 kPa (CI 1.5-2.1) vs 0.7 kPa (CI 0.5-0.9) respectively (p < 0.001). The mean rise in PtcCO(2) following a single intravenous bolus of morphine delivered via PCA was 0.05 kPa (SEm 0.01), peaking at 12 min post-dose. The transcutaneous capnometer successfully recorded data for 98% of the total time it was applied to patients.

Pharmacological characterization of noroxymorphone as a new opioid for spinal analgesia

BACKGROUND

Noroxymorphone is one of the major metabolites of oxycodone. Although oxycodone is commonly used in the treatment of acute and chronic pain, little is known about the antinociceptive effects of noroxymorphone. We present an in vivo pharmacological characterization of noroxymorphone in rats.

METHODS

The antinociceptive properties of noroxymorphone were studied with thermal and mechanical models of nociception in rats.

RESULTS

Intrathecal noroxymorphone (1 and 5 microg/10 microL) induced a significantly longer lasting antinociceptive effect compared with oxycodone (200 microg/10 microL) and morphine (1 and 5 microg/10 microL). Pretreatment with subcutaneous naloxone (1 mg/kg) 15 min before intrathecal drug administration significantly decreased the antinociceptive effect of both noroxymorphone and morphine, indicating an opioid receptor-mediated antinociceptive effect. In the hotplate, paw pressure, and tail flick tests, subcutaneous noroxymorphone was inactive in doses of 5, 10, and 25 mg/kg. Also, no effect on motor function was observed in the rotarod test with doses studied. No antihyperalgesic effect was observed in the carrageenan model for inflammation in rats with subcutaneous noroxymorphone 25 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that noroxymorphone is a potent mu-opioid receptor agonist when administered intrathecally. The lack of systemic efficacy may indicate reduced ability of noroxymorphone to penetrate the blood-brain barrier due to its low calculated logD value (log octanol/water partition coefficient). Thus, noroxymorphone should have a negligible role in analgesia after systemic administration of oxycodone. Because of its spinal efficacy and long duration of effect, noroxymorphone is an interesting opioid for spinal analgesia with a low potential for abuse. Its safety for spinal administration should be assessed before clinical use.

Oxycodone and morphine have distinctly different pharmacological profiles: Radioligand binding and behavioural studies in two rat models of neuropathic pain

Previously, we reported that oxycodone is a putative kappa-opioid agonist based on studies where intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) pre-treatment of rats with the kappa-selective opioid antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), abolished i.c.v. oxycodone but not morphine antinociception, whereas pretreatment with i.c.v. naloxonazine (mu-selective antagonist) produced the opposite effects. In the present study, we used behavioural experiments in rat models of mechanical and biochemical nerve injury together with radioligand binding to further examine the pharmacology of oxycodone. Following chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve in rats, the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal (i.t.) oxycodone, but not i.t. morphine, were abolished by nor-BNI. Marked differences were found in the antinociceptive properties of oxycodone and morphine in streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic rats. While the antinociceptive efficacy of morphine was abolished at 12 and 24 weeks post-STZ administration, the antinociceptive efficacy of s.c. oxycodone was maintained over 24 weeks, albeit with an approximately 3- to 4-fold decrease in potency. In rat brain membranes irreversibly depleted of mu- and delta-opioid binding sites, oxycodone displaced [(3)H]bremazocine (kappa(2)-selective in depleted membranes) binding with relatively high affinity whereas the selective mu- and delta-opioid ligands, CTOP (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2)) and DPDPE ([D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin), respectively, did not. In depleted brain membranes, the kappa(2b)-ligand, leu-enkephalin, prevented oxycodone's displacement of high-affinity [(3)H]bremazocine binding, suggesting the notion that oxycodone is a kappa(2b)-opioid ligand. Collectively, the present findings provide further support for the notion that oxycodone and morphine produce antinociception through distinctly different opioid receptor populations. Oxycodone appears to act as a kappa(2b)-opioid agonist with a relatively low affinity for mu-opioid receptors.

Oxycodone

Oxycodone has been in clinical use since 1917. Parenteral oxycodone was used mainly for the treatment of acute postoperative pain whereas combinations, for example, oxycodone and acetaminophen, were used for moderate pain. Since the introduction of controlled-release oxycodone, it has been used to manage cancer-related pain and chronic non-cancer-related pain problems. Controlled studies have been performed in postoperative pain, cancer pain, osteoarthritis-related pain, and neuropathic pain due to postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic neuropathy. The pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone are typical of a mu-opioid agonist. Oxycodone closely resembles morphine but it has some distinct differences, particularly in its pharmacokinetic profile. Being an old drug, the basic pharmacology of oxycodone has been a neglected field of research.

Epidural oxycodone or morphine following gynaecological surgery †

BACKGROUND

The analgesic action of oxycodone is of rapid onset, in contrast to morphine, and is mediated by kappa-opioid receptors of the spinal cord. We compared analgesia and side-effects of epidural oxycodone with those of morphine after gynaecological surgery.

METHODS

We studied prospectively in 75 women in a double-blind, randomized manner: epidural morphine 6 mg day(-1) (n=25), epidural oxycodone 6 mg day(-1) (n=25) and epidural oxycodone 12 mg day(-1) (n=25). All patients underwent gynaecological surgery under general (isoflurane and nitrous oxide) and epidural anaesthesia. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and on coughing, verbal descriptive scale (VDS) satisfaction scores, sedation scores, pruritus scores and nausea/vomiting scores were recorded for 3 days after surgery.

RESULTS

VAS pain scores at rest in patients who received oxycodone 6 mg day(-1) were higher than in patients who received morphine 6 mg day(-1) at 6 h and on the first postoperative day and were significantly higher than in patients who received oxycodone 12 mg day(-1) on the first postoperative day. Scores for nausea, vomiting and pruritus in patients who received oxycodone 6 mg day(-1) and 12 mg day(-1) were lower than those in patients who received morphine. No significant differences were seen in VAS at cough and VDS satisfaction scores between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Epidural oxycodone was as effective as morphine at the doses investigated, with fewer side-effects.

Effects of blocking CYP2D6 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone

BACKGROUND

Oxycodone is metabolized in the liver by means of O-demethylation to form oxymorphone in a reaction catalyzed by the enzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). This enzyme is expressed as 2 phenotypes (extensive and poor metabolizers). Several drugs are metabolized by CYP2D6, and clinically relevant drug interactions may occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of oxymorphone in mediating the opioid effects of oxycodone by means of blocking CYP2D6 with quinidine.

METHODS

Ten healthy extensive metabolizers were administered 20 mg controlled-release oxycodone after premedication with placebo or 200 mg quinidine in this randomized, double-blind crossover study. A dose of 100 mg quinidine was administered 6 hours later. Plasma opioid concentrations, subjective pharmacodynamic ratings, and psychomotor function were assessed for 24 hours after drug administration.

RESULTS

No oxymorphone was detected at any time after quinidine premedication in 8 of 10 subjects. Plasma oxycodone (difference not significant) and noroxycodone (P < .01) concentrations were greater after quinidine pretreatment. Prevention of the production of oxymorphone by quinidine did not affect the psychomotor or subjective drug effects of oxycodone. No difference in number of adverse effects was observed after the 2 pretreatments.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant reduction in plasma oxymorphone levels did not substantially alter the pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone. Analgesia was not evaluated because pain was not present.

Anaesthetists as pain management consultants

Anaesthetists who manage acute and chronic pain need to be familiar with current research and practice guidelines in these areas. New local anaesthetics and new routes of administration for opioids and adjuvants may further improve our management of acute pain. The safety of epidural analgesia in combination with low molecular weight heparins and the role of the anaesthetist on the acute pain service are reviewed. Chronic pain disability is increasing, necessitating a re-evaluation of our approach to chronic pain. The limitations of nerve blocks are acknowledged and guidelines for managing chronic pain and opioids are available. Anaesthetists must recognize psychological difficulties as a significant perpetuating factor in chronic pain.