The relative clinical effectiveness of HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate in asthma

Pulmonary aerosol delivery and the importance of growth dynamics

Aerosols are dynamic systems, responding to variations in the surrounding environmental conditions by changing in size, composition and phase. Although, widely used in inhalation therapies, details of the processes occurring on aerosol generation and during inhalation have received little attention. Instead, research has focused on improvements to the formulation of the drug prior to aerosolization and the resulting clinical efficacy of the treatment. Here, we highlight the processes that occur during aerosol generation and inhalation, affecting aerosol disposition when deposited and, potentially, impacting total and regional doses. In particular, we examine the response of aerosol particles to the humid environment of the respiratory tract, considering both the capacity of particles to grow by absorbing moisture and the timescale for condensation to occur. [Formula: see text].

Aerosol drug delivery: developments in device design and clinical use

Aerosolised drugs are prescribed for use in a range of inhaler devices and systems. Delivering drugs by inhalation requires a formulation that can be successfully aerosolised and a delivery system that produces a useful aerosol of the drug; the particles or droplets need to be of sufficient size and mass to be carried to the distal lung or deposited on proximal airways to give rise to a therapeutic effect. Patients and caregivers must use and maintain these aerosol drug delivery devices correctly. In recent years, several technical innovations have led to aerosol drug delivery devices with efficient drug delivery and with novel features that take into account factors such as dose tracking, portability, materials of manufacture, breath actuation, the interface with the patient, combination therapies, and systemic delivery. These changes have improved performance in all four categories of devices: metered dose inhalers, spacers and holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulisers. Additionally, several therapies usually given by injection are now prescribed as aerosols for use in a range of drug delivery devices. In this Review, we discuss recent developments in the design and clinical use of aerosol devices over the past 10-15 years with an emphasis on the treatment of respiratory disorders.

Comparison of inhaled corticosteroids: an update

OBJECTIVE

To review the basis for the estimated comparative daily dosages of inhaled corticosteroids for children and adults that are presented in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Expert Panel Report 3; in addition, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic basis for potential clinical differences among inhaled corticosteroids is discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A complete MEDLINE search was conducted of human studies of asthma pharmacotherapy published between January 1, 2001, and March 15, 2006, followed by a PubMed search up until August 2008, using ciclesonide, inhaled corticosteroids, and pharmacokinetics as key words. Product information on each inhaled corticosteroid was also included.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Comparative clinical trials of inhaled corticosteroids and systematic reviews for efficacy comparisons were evaluated. Extensive literature reviews, meta-analyses, and selected clinical studies that illustrate or represent specific points of view were selected. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data extracted from previously published reviews and specific studies were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pharmacodynamic characteristics (glucocorticoid receptor binding) and lung delivery determine the relative clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties (oral bioavailability, lung retention, systemic clearance) and determine comparative therapeutic index of the inhaled corticosteroids. Secondary pharmacokinetic differences (intracellular fatty acid esterification, high serum protein binding) that have been posited to improve duration of action and/or therapeutic index are unproven, and current comparative clinical trials do not support the hypotheses that they provide an advantage. Ultrafine particle meter-dose inhalers (MDIs) have not demonstrated superior asthma control or improved safety over older MDIs. All of the inhaled corticosteroids demonstrate efficacy with once-daily dosing, and all are more effective when dosed twice daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that all of the inhaled corticosteroids have sufficient therapeutic indexes to provide similar efficacy and safety in low to medium doses. Whether or not some of the newer inhaled corticosteroids offer any advantages at higher doses has yet to be determined.

Efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate HFA 200 microg once daily in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma

The efficacy and safety of once-daily beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; 200 microg), in combination with the propellant hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) was compared with that of budesonide turbuhaler (BUD-TH) 400 microg twice daily and fluticasone propionate inhaler (FP-IH) 250 microg twice daily in 40 patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients had used inhaled corticosteroids for at least 1 month. On randomization, 20 patients were switched to HFA-BDP and 20 patients remained on their existing BUD-TH or FP-IH treatment. After 8 weeks, HFA-BDP demonstrated a greater improvement in spirometric values, respiratory symptoms and beta2-agonist use. No significant local adverse effects were observed. Blood cortisol levels remained in the normal range in both groups. We conclude that HFA-BDP (200 microg once-daily) offered more benefit in terms of clinical and spirometry indices than BUD-TH (400 microg twice daily) or FP-IH (250 microg twice daily) in patients with moderate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.