Reversibility tests in chronic obstructive airways disease: their predictive value with reference to benefit from domiciliary nebuliser therapy

Overcoming gaps in the management of asthma in older patients: new insights

Asthma is under-recognised and undertreated in older populations. This is not surprising, given that one-third of older people experience significant breathlessness. The differential diagnosis commonly includes asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, malignancy, aspiration and infections. Because symptoms and signs of several cardiorespiratory diseases are nonspecific in older people and diseases commonly co-exist, investigations are important. A simple strategy for the investigation of breathlessness in older people should include a full blood count, chest radiograph, ECG, peak flow diary and/or spirometry with reversibility as a minimum. If there are major abnormalities on the ECG, an echocardiogram should also be performed. Diurnal variability in peak flow readings >or=20% or >or=15% reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, spontaneously or with treatment, support a diagnosis of asthma. Distinguishing asthma from COPD is important to allow appropriate management of disease based on aetiology, accurate prediction of treatment response, correct prognosis and appropriate management of the chest condition and co-morbidities. The two conditions are usually readily differentiated by clinical features, particularly age at onset, variability of symptoms and nocturnal symptoms in asthma, supported by the results of reversibility testing. Full lung function tests may not necessarily help in differentiating the two entities, although gas transfer factor is characteristically reduced in COPD and usually normal or high in asthma. Methacholine challenge tests previously mainly used in research are now also used widely and safely to confirm asthma in clinical settings. Interest in exhaled nitric oxide as a biomarker of airways inflammation is increasing as a noninvasive tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma. Regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of treatment of asthma. Even in mild disease in older adults, regular preventive treatment should be considered, given the poor perception of bronchoconstriction by older asthmatic patients. If symptoms persist despite ICS, addition of long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) should be considered. Addition of LABA to ICS improves asthma control and allows reduction in ICS dose. However, older people have been grossly under-represented in trials of LABA, many trials having excluded those >or=65 years of age. On meta-analysis, beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (both short acting and long acting) are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in asthma and COPD. While the evidence for excess cardiovascular mortality is stronger for short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, it would be prudent to exercise particular care in using beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (long acting and short acting) in those at risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including older people. Regular review of cardiovascular status (and monitoring of serum potassium concentration) in patients taking beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists is crucial. The response to LABA should be carefully monitored and alternative 'add-on' therapy such as leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRA) should be considered. LRA have fewer adverse effects and in individual cases may be more effective and appropriate than LABA. Long-term trials evaluating beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and other bronchodilator strategies are needed particularly in the elderly and in patients with cardiovascular co-morbidities. There is no evidence that addition of anticholinergics improves control of asthma further, although the role of long-acting anticholinergics in the prevention of disease progression is currently being researched. Older patients need to be taught good inhaler technique to improve delivery of medications to lungs, minimise adverse effects and reduce the need for oral corticosteroids. Nurse-led education programmes that include a written asthma self-management plan have the potential to improve outcomes.

Total reversibility testing as indicator of the clinical efficacy of formoterol in COPD

RATIONALE

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines recommend bronchodilator reversibility testing to guide treatment decisions. This study evaluated the relationship between the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) with salbutamol or formoterol and the clinical effects of a 4-week formoterol (Foradil) treatment.

METHODS

At Visit 1, patients (n = 448) with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease took an FEV1 reversibility test using 200 microg salbutamol via a metered dose inhaler. At Visit 2 (Day 0), an FEV1 reversibility test was performed using formoterol via a dry-powder inhaler (Aerolizer). Patients then received formoterol 12 microg twice daily until Visit 3 (Day 21-30), when a further formoterol FEV1 reversibility test was performed. Clinical parameters included FEV1, symptom questionnaires and rescue medication use.

RESULTS

There was no significant relationship between the immediate change in FEV1 with salbutamol and the absolute change from baseline in FEV1, symptom scores or rescue medication use after a 4-week formoterol treatment. Relative immediate change in FEV1 with formoterol was correlated with change in rescue medication use (P = 0.02) and FEV1 at Visit 3 (P < 0.001). Total reversibility in FEV1 with formoterol (post-dose Visit 3-pre-dose Visit 2) was correlated with all treatment efficacy variables (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate salbutamol reversibility testing, as performed under these study conditions, failed to predict the clinical efficacy of formoterol. Total reversibility after 4 weeks of formoterol treatment may be a better predictor of clinical benefits of long-term bronchodilator therapy.

The effect of inhaled beta2-agonists on clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The major clinical outcomes measured in evaluating the responses to pharmacotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include the severity of dyspnea, exercise capacity, exacerbations, and health status. Various studies have demonstrated that testing for acute bronchodilator reversibility in the pulmonary function laboratory does not predict the clinical responses to a trial of bronchodilator therapy in patients with COPD. Separate studies have shown that inhaled albuterol, both a single dose (300 microg) and 2 weeks of therapy (200 microg/4x/day), reduces dyspnea. There is more published information available about the effects of long-acting (>/=12 hours' duration of action) inhaled beta(2)-agonists because of greater interest in considering clinical outcomes at the time of drug testing. In one randomized clinical trial, formoterol reduced symptoms (as recorded in a home diary) and improved health status. Nine clinical studies have examined the effects of salmeterol on clinical outcomes. Salmeterol reduced the perception of breathlessness (in 6 of 9 studies) and improved health status (in 3 of 4 studies). These results collectively demonstrate that long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists not only relax bronchial smooth muscle but also provide important clinical benefits in symptomatic patients with COPD.

Alternative methods for assessing bronchodilator reversibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator reversibility testing is recommended in all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but does not predict improvements in breathlessness or exercise performance. Two alternative ways of assessing lung mechanics-measurement of end expiratory lung volume (EELV) using the inspiratory capacity manoeuvre and application of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) during tidal breathing to detect tidal airflow limitation-do relate to the degree of breathlessness in COPD. Their usefulness as end points in bronchodilator reversibility testing has not been examined.

METHODS

We studied 20 patients with clinically stable COPD (mean age 69.9 (1.5) years, 15 men, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 29.5 (1.6)% predicted) with tidal flow limitation as assessed by their maximum flow-volume loop. Spirometric parameters, slow vital capacity (SVC), inspiratory capacity (IC), and NEP were measured seated, before and after nebulised saline, and at intervals after 5 mg nebulised salbutamol and 500 microg nebulised ipratropium bromide. The patients attended twice and the treatment order was randomised.

RESULTS

Mean FEV(1), FVC, SVC, and IC were unchanged after saline but the degree of tidal flow limitation varied. FEV(1) improved significantly after salbutamol and ipratropium (0.11 (0.02) l and 0.09 (0.02) l, respectively) as did the other lung volumes with further significant increases after the combination. Tidal volume and mean expiratory flow increased significantly after all bronchodilators but breathlessness fell significantly only after the combination treatment. The initial NEP score was unrelated to subsequent changes in lung volume.

CONCLUSIONS

NEP is not an appropriate measurement of acute bronchodilator responsiveness. Changes in IC were significantly larger than those in FEV(1) and may be more easily detected. However, our data showed no evidence for separation of "reversible" and "irreversible" groups whatever outcome measure was adopted.

Alternative methods for assessing bronchodilator reversibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator reversibility testing is recommended in all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but does not predict improvements in breathlessness or exercise performance. Two alternative ways of assessing lung mechanics—measurement of end expiratory lung volume (EELV) using the inspiratory capacity manoeuvre and application of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) during tidal breathing to detect tidal airflow limitation—do relate to the degree of breathlessness in COPD. Their usefulness as end points in bronchodilator reversibility testing has not been examined.

METHODS

We studied 20 patients with clinically stable COPD (mean age 69.9 (1.5) years, 15 men, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 29.5 (1.6)% predicted) with tidal flow limitation as assessed by their maximum flow-volume loop. Spirometric parameters, slow vital capacity (SVC), inspiratory capacity (IC), and NEP were measured seated, before and after nebulised saline, and at intervals after 5 mg nebulised salbutamol and 500 μg nebulised ipratropium bromide. The patients attended twice and the treatment order was randomised.

RESULTS

Mean FEV1, FVC, SVC, and IC were unchanged after saline but the degree of tidal flow limitation varied. FEV1 improved significantly after salbutamol and ipratropium (0.11 (0.02) l and 0.09 (0.02) l, respectively) as did the other lung volumes with further significant increases after the combination. Tidal volume and mean expiratory flow increased significantly after all bronchodilators but breathlessness fell significantly only after the combination treatment. The initial NEP score was unrelated to subsequent changes in lung volume.

CONCLUSIONS

NEP is not an appropriate measurement of acute bronchodilator responsiveness. Changes in IC were significantly larger than those in FEV1and may be more easily detected. However, our data showed no evidence for separation of “reversible” and “irreversible” groups whatever outcome measure was adopted.

The role of domiciliary nebulizers in managing patients with severe COPD

The difficulty of assessing nebulizer responses in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been demonstrated before. This study aims to re-examine both the role of domiciliary nebulizers in COPD and also bronchodilator (BD) assessment in individuals. In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, 19 stable patients with severe COPD were given the following medication 6-hourly for 2-week periods: (1) nebulized salbutamol 2.5 mg with ipratropium 0.5 mg and placebo inhalers (MDI) with spacer; (2) placebo nebules and inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer; (3) inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer (but no placebo nebulized drugs). Both nebulized and MDI drugs produced highly significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), specific airways conductance, 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and residual volume. There were no significant differences between BD responses obtained after active nebulized and active MDI BDs. From the diary cards, 2 weeks of active nebulized BDs produced a slightly higher median peak expiratory flow (PEF) than active MDI BDs (236 and 219 l m(-1), respectively, P=0.01) and slightly less extra inhaler use (0.8 and 1.1 puffs, respectively, P<0.05) but no significant difference in dyspnoea or quality of life (QOL) scores. There were significant correlations between domiciliary PEF and acute BD-induced changes in FVC and 6MWD, and also between domiciliary dyspnoea scores and acute changes in both total lung capacity and 6MWD. In conclusion, nebulized medication conferred little clinical advantage over the regular use of inhalers with spacers in this group of patients with severe COPD. However, acute changes in total lung capacity, FVC and 6MWD may be useful predictors of the longer-term effects of nebulized BDs in individual patients.

Short-acting beta 2 agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a chronic condition characterised by progressive airflow limitation that is at most partially reversible. Despite the lack of reversibility patients often report symptomatic improvement with short-acting beta 2 bronchodilator medications. They are used on either an "as required" or a "regular plus as required basis" and they may be used in conjunction with other bronchodilator medicines such as ipratropium and methylxanthines. These medicines are used in the management of both stable and acute exacerbations of COPD. This review examined the effect of short-acting beta 2 bronchodilators given by inhalation in stable COPD.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effect and assess the adverse effects of inhaled short-acting beta 2 agonist bronchodilators compared with placebo in stable COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were considered. RCTs were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group database (CENTRAL). In addition, the reference lists of review articles and RCTs retrieved in full were searched for other potentially relevant citations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only trials with adult patients with stable COPD, as defined by internationally accepted guidelines (ATS, ERS or BTS) were included in this review. All trials had a minimum duration of 7 days of regular treatment with short-acting beta 2 bronchodilators given by inhalation and compared with placebo. Data from trials where beta 2 agonists were used alone or in combination with other medicines (e.g. ipratropium bromide) were used only if there was a direct comparison between beta 2 bronchodilator alone and placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcomes were analysed as continuous or dichotomous outcomes, using standard statistical techniques. For continuous outcomes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and for dichotomous outcomes, the odds ratio was calculated with 95% confidence intervals by Peto's methods. Funnel plots were used to test for publication bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in this review. Most had small sample sizes and some of the sutides used very short-acting outdated compounds. All the studies used a cross-over design and were of high quality. Spirometry done at the end of study period was measured after administration of treatment (post-bronchodilator) which showed both FEV1 (0.150 L/min, 95%CI: 0. 02-0.28) and FVC (0.310 L, 95%CI: 0.00-0.62) to improve significanly but slightly when compared to placebo. A few studies measured FRC, airway resistance or conductance at the end of the study period. In all cases these measurements were done several hours after treatment, and no significant differences (p>0.05 in all cases) were found between the bronchodilator and placebo groups. Walking test Large increases in 6MW distance was observed in two studies, however one study did not show any positive improvements. There was a large increase in the 12MW distance as shown by one study. Due to the small number of studies reporting this outcome no significant differences were found in the walking distance between the bronchodilator and placebo groups. Peak Flow Rate Both morning (36. 04 L/min; 95%CI: 0.80-71.27) and evening (36.68 L/min; 95%CI: 2. 47-70.89) PEFR were significantly higher during active treatment than during placebo. Symptoms Breatlessness was measured on various scales therefore data that were presented in a suitable form were combined using standardized means for inclusion in the analysis. A significant improvement (-0.33; 95%CI: -0.58 to -0.07 with p=0.01) in the breathlessness score was observed during treatment with beta-2 agonist when compared to placebo. Cough was reported to improve significantly (data not usable) during treatment with beta2 agonist in one study but not in two others. A non-significant decrease in sputum production was reported by Wilson 1980, however four other studies reported no

Nebulized bronchodilators for outpatient management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The bronchodilator efficacy, safety, and persistence of effect of the anticholinergic agent ipratropium bromide and the beta-adrenergic agonist albuterol, both given by nebulization, were compared in 223 patients with stable, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial conducted over 85 days. Patients took the study drugs (either 500 micrograms of ipratropium bromide or 2.5 mg of albuterol) three times daily on an outpatient basis throughout the study. The acute bronchodilator responses to nebulized ipratropium bromide and albuterol were studied on days 1, 43, and 85. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) response was similar for both drugs on day 1 (33% peak increase after ipratropium bromide and 36% peak increase after albuterol). However, albuterol's effect on FEV1 decreased over time. Clinical improvement was noted in both study groups, but the ipratropium bromide group had a greater symptomatic benefit. Patients receiving ipratropium bromide scored higher on a quality-of-life questionnaire evaluating dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, and mastery. Side effects were relatively infrequent and generally mild for both study drugs. These results show that ipratropium bromide, given by nebulization, is safe and effective in the outpatient treatment of COPD.

Comparison of nebulised salbutamol and ipratropium bromide with salbutamol alone in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Patients admitted with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often prescribed ipratropium bromide in combination with a beta 2 agonist such as salbutamol. Studies have not shown any benefit in adding ipratropium bromide to salbutamol in acute exacerbations of COPD, but these studies have only assessed patients for 60-90 minutes and short term studies may not predict long term clinical response. Combination therapy with the two drugs was compared with salbutamol alone in the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD during a hospital admission.

METHODS

Seventy patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD were randomly allocated to receive either nebulised salbutamol 5 mg and ipratropium bromide 500 micrograms, or nebulised salbutamol 5 mg alone (all four times a day) on admission. All other treatment was prescribed at the discretion of the attending physician. Length of stay in hospital and spirometric values on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and discharge were assessed. Patients completed a subjective symptom score each day.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups in the mean (SD) length of stay (salbutamol 10.5 (4.7) days, salbutamol + ipratropium bromide 11.8 (4.4) days; 95% CI -1.02 to 3.62). There was no difference in spirometric values on days 1, 3, 7, 14, or discharge between the two groups. The subjective improvement was similar with both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine addition of nebulised ipratropium bromide to salbutamol appears to be of no benefit in the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD.

Efficacy of inhaled salmeterol in the management of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study

BACKGROUND

The acute response to bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is modest; it has, however, been suggested that these patients may benefit from long term treatment.

METHODS

To investigate the efficacy of salmeterol in smokers with moderate to severe COPD a double blind, randomised, crossover comparison was performed between salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) and placebo in 63 patients with stable COPD (mean age 65 years). Prior to inclusion, all patients had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of < 60% of predicted and an improvement in FEV1 of < 15% following 400 micrograms inhaled salbutamol. Patients received four weeks of therapy with each of the treatment regimens. Assessment of efficacy was made with recording of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), respiratory symptoms, and use of rescue salbutamol. FEV1 was measured before and after nebulised salbutamol prior to randomisation and at the end of each treatment period.

RESULTS

Morning PEF values were higher during the salmeterol than during the placebo period, although the mean treatment difference was small (12 l/min (95% confidence limits 6 to 17)). No difference in mean evening PEF values was found. Diurnal variation in PEF, assessed as the difference between the morning PEF and that of the previous evening, was more pronounced during the placebo than during the salmeterol period. The mean spirometric values (including reversibility in FEV1) obtained at the end of the two treatment periods were similar. Compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol was associated with lower daytime and night time symptom scores and less use of rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night. The patients rated the treatment with salmeterol better than treatment with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol produces an improvement in respiratory symptoms and morning PEF values in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Treatment with long acting beta agonists may therefore result in an improvement in functional status, even in patients suffering from apparently nonreversible obstructive pulmonary disease.

Salmeterol and formoterol in partially reversible severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a dose-response study

When testing the response to beta 2-agonist drugs in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a dose-response assessment should be undertaken. This study compares the time course of inhaled salmeterol (25, 50 and 75 micrograms) and formoterol (12, 24 and 36 micrograms) at different doses in a group of 12 patients with partially reversible, but severe COPD (FEV1 of 12-32% of predicted values after beta 2-agonist drugs had been withheld for 24 h). All doses of salmeterol and formoterol induced a significant (P < 0.01) spirometric improvement over the 12-h monitoring period, when compared to the spirometric improvement after placebo, but while formoterol induced a dose-dependent increase of the FVC, FEV1 and FEF50, this was not the case for salmeterol. In fact, 75 micrograms salmeterol did not produce a further improvement of these parameters. Mean peak bronchodilation, expressed as the increase in FEV1 over baseline values, occurred 2 h after inhalation of the three doses of salmeterol, and 1 h after inhalation of the three doses of formoterol. A comparison of 50 micrograms salmeterol with 12 micrograms or 24 micrograms formoterol (clinically recommended doses), showed that improvement of FEV1 after salmeterol was statistically (P < 0.05) higher than that after the two doses of formoterol, although the mean peak bronchodilations were similar. This was because salmeterol has a longer duration of action than formoterol. These data demonstrate that salmeterol is equally effective as, but longer-acting than, formoterol at clinically recommended doses in patients suffering from COPD, with severe airway obstruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Assessment and provision of home nebulizers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the Yorkshire region of the U.K

A survey was undertaken to determine the current practice in the Yorkshire Health Region for the assessment and provision of home nebulizers for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A detailed postal questionnaire on assessment methods was sent to each of the 22 consultant physicians in respiratory medicine. The 17 consultants who also organized the adult home nebulizer service for their health district were asked about the services offered and funding for the service. Replies were received from all consultants. All physicians use objective measurement for assessing patients for home nebulizer therapy, but there is a variable emphasis on laboratory studies, walking distance and home trials with peak flow measurements. The majority (86%) incorporate a home trial into their assessment. Many physicians also take into account subjective response to nebulized bronchodilators. There is considerable variation in the provision and funding of home nebulizer services. Those districts with a coordinated service appear to offer a more comprehensive service. A consensus on nebulizer provision, with recommendations for minimum levels of provision in each health district, should result in a more uniform delivery of service.