Effect of angiotensin II on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in the human airway both in vitro and in vivo

Diagnosis and Management of Vasoplegia in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Narrative Review

Refractory vasodilatory shock, or vasoplegia, is a pathophysiologic state observed in the intensive care unit and operating room in patients with a variety of primary diagnoses. Definitions of vasoplegia vary by source but are qualitatively defined clinically as a normal or high cardiac index and low systemic vascular resistance causing hypotension despite high-dose vasopressors in the setting of euvolemia. This definition can be difficult to apply to patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A large body of mostly retrospective literature exists on vasoplegia in the non-MCS population, but the increased use of temporary MCS justifies an examination of vasoplegia in this population. MCS, particularly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, adds complexity to the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia due to challenges in determining cardiac output (or total blood flow), lack of clarity on appropriate dosing of noncatecholamine interventions, increased thrombosis risk, the difficulty in determining the endpoints of adequate volume resuscitation, and the unclear effects of rescue agents (methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, and angiotensin II) on MCS device monitoring and function. Care teams must combine data from invasive and noninvasive sources to diagnose vasoplegia in this population. In this narrative review, the available literature is surveyed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia in the temporary MCS population, with a focus on noncatecholamine treatments and special considerations for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, transvalvular heart pumps, and other ventricular assist devices.

Hyperoxia-induced airflow restriction and Renin-Angiotensin System expression in a bronchopulmonary dysplasia mouse model

Mechanisms underlying hyperoxia-induced airflow restriction in the pediatric lung disease Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) are unclear. We hypothesized a role for Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) activity in BPD. RAS is comprised of a pro-developmental pathway consisting of angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) and angiotensin II receptor type 2 (AT2), and a pro-fibrotic pathway mediated by angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1). We investigated associations between neonatal hyperoxia, airflow restriction, and RAS activity in a BPD mouse model. C57 mouse pups were randomized to normoxic (FiO2  = 0.21) or hyperoxic (FiO2  = 0.75) conditions for 15 days (P1-P15). At P15, P20, and P30, we measured airflow restriction using plethysmography and ACE2, AT1, and AT2 mRNA and protein expression via polymerase chain reaction and Western Blot. Hyperoxia increased airflow restriction P15 and P20, decreased ACE2 and AT2 mRNA, decreased AT2 protein, and increased AT1 protein expression. ACE2 mRNA and protein remained suppressed at P20. By P30, airflow restriction and RAS expression did not differ between groups. Hyperoxia caused high airflow restriction, increased pulmonary expression of the pro-fibrotic RAS pathway, and decreased expression of the pro-developmental in our BPD mouse model. These associated findings may point to a causal role for RAS in hyperoxia-induced airflow restriction.

Angiotensin II: a new therapeutic option for vasodilatory shock

Angiotensin II (Ang II), part of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS), is a potent vasoconstrictor and has been recently approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration in high-output shock. Though not a new drug, the recently published Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High Output Shock (ATHOS-3) trial, as well as a number of retrospective analyses have sparked renewed interest in the use of Ang II, which may have a role in treating refractory shock. We describe refractory shock, the unique mechanism of action of Ang II, RAS dysregulation in shock, and the evidence supporting the use of Ang II to restore blood pressure. Evidence suggests that Ang II may preferentially be of benefit in acute kidney injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, where the RAS is known to be disrupted. Additionally, there may be a role for Ang II in cardiogenic shock, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor overdose, cardiac arrest, liver failure, and in settings of extracorporeal circulation.

Clinical Experience With IV Angiotensin II Administration: A Systematic Review of Safety

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin II is an endogenous hormone with vasopressor and endocrine activities. This is a systematic review of the safety of IV angiotensin II.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies in which human subjects received IV angiotensin II were selected whether or not safety was discussed.

DATA EXTRACTION

In total, 18,468 studies were screened by two reviewers and one arbiter. One thousand one hundred twenty-four studies, in which 31,281 participants received angiotensin II (0.5-3,780 ng/kg/min), were selected. Data recorded included number of subjects, comorbidities, angiotensin II dose and duration, pressor effects, other physiologic and side effects, and adverse events.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The most common nonpressor effects included changes in plasma aldosterone, renal function, cardiac variables, and electrolytes. Adverse events were infrequent and included headache, chest pressure, and orthostatic symptoms. The most serious side effects were exacerbation of left ventricular failure in patients with congestive heart failure and bronchoconstriction. One patient with congestive heart failure died from refractory left ventricular failure. Refractory hypotensive shock was fatal in 55 of 115 patients treated with angiotensin II in case studies, cohort studies, and one placebo-controlled study. One healthy subject died after a pressor dose of angiotensin II was infused continuously for 6 days. No other serious adverse events attributable to angiotensin II were reported. Heterogeneity in study design prevented meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events associated with angiotensin II were infrequent; however, exacerbation of asthma and congestive heart failure and one fatal cerebral hemorrhage were reported. This systematic review supports the notion that angiotensin II has an acceptable safety profile for use in humans.

Mast cells in asthma--state of the art

Mast cells (MCs) play a central role in tissue homoeostasis, sensing the local environment through numerous innate cell surface receptors. This enables them to respond rapidly to perceived tissue insults with a view to initiating a co-ordinated programme of inflammation and repair. However, when the tissue insult is chronic, the ongoing release of multiple pro-inflammatory mediators, proteases, cytokines and chemokines leads to tissue damage and remodelling. In asthma, there is strong evidence of ongoing MC activation, and their mediators and cell-cell signals are capable of regulating many facets of asthma pathophysiology. This article reviews the evidence behind this.

Mast cell renin and a local renin-angiotensin system in the airway: role in bronchoconstriction

We previously reported that mast cells express renin, the rate-limiting enzyme in the renin-angiotensin cascade. We have now assessed whether mast cell renin release triggers angiotensin formation in the airway. In isolated rat bronchial rings, mast cell degranulation released enzyme with angiotensin I-forming activity blocked by the selective renin inhibitor BILA2157. Local generation of angiotensin (ANG II) from mast cell renin elicited bronchial smooth muscle contraction mediated by ANG II type 1 receptors (AT(1)R). In a guinea pig model of immediate type hypersensitivity, anaphylactic mast cell degranulation in bronchial rings resulted in ANG II-mediated constriction. As in rat bronchial rings, bronchoconstriction (BC) was inhibited by a renin inhibitor, an AT(1)R blocker, and a mast cell stabilizer. Anaphylactic release of renin, histamine, and beta-hexosaminidase from mast cells was confirmed in the effluent from isolated, perfused guinea pig lung. To relate the significance of this finding to humans, mast cells were isolated from macroscopically normal human lung waste tissue specimens. Sequence analysis of human lung mast cell RNA showed 100% homology between human lung mast cell renin and kidney renin between exons 1 and 10. Furthermore, the renin protein expressed in lung mast cells was enzymatically active. Our results demonstrate the existence of an airway renin-angiotensin system triggered by release of mast-cell renin. The data show that locally produced ANG II is a critical factor governing BC, opening the possibility for novel therapeutic targets in the management of airway disease.

The pharmacologic treatment of uncomplicated arterial hypertension in patients with airway dysfunction

Because many antihypertensive drugs can affect airway function, the treatment of hypertension in patients with airway dysfunction is complex. For example, the worsening or precipitation of asthma by beta-adrenoceptor antagonists is well-recognized, but beta(1)-adrenoceptor blockers that exert mild beta(2)-agonist effects, and those that modulate the endogenous production of nitric oxide, affect airway function to a lesser extent. Therapy with selective alpha(1)-blockers is not contraindicated in cases of chronic airway obstruction. Conversely, alpha(2)-agonists must not be given to asthmatic subjects because they can adversely affect the bronchi. Calcium channel blockers do not exert severe side effects on the airways. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may cause cough and exacerbate or even induce asthma; however, angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) antagonists do not cause cough. 5-Hydroxytryptamine modifiers such as urapidil are a treatment option for patients with chronic airway obstruction. In patients with airway dysfunction, we suggest treatment with thiazide diuretics as the initial drug choice, and calcium channel blockers if the response is poor. In the case of no response, calcium channel blockers alone must be used. However, there is no strict rule because individual patients may respond differently to individual drugs and drug combinations. Consequently, it is important to adopt a flexible approach. For patients who are unresponsive to the aforementioned drugs, AT(1) receptor antagonists, newer beta(1)-adrenoceptor-blocking agents with ancillary properties (eg, celiprolol or nebivolol), and/or vasodilators can be considered.

Effect of losartan, a type 1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in patients with bronchial asthma

It is unclear whether angiotensin II receptors are involved in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. We examined the effect of losartan, a specific angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, on bronchial responsiveness to inhaled methacholine in eight patients with stable asthma. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine, assessed as the concentration of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)-FEV(1)) and a 35% fall in standardized partial expiratory flow at 40% of FVC (PC(35)-PEF(40)), was measured on two occasions 2 wk apart. Losartan (50 mg once a day) or a placebo was orally administered for 1 wk before methacholine provocation test in a double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion. Although the PC(20)-FEV(1) values after placebo (2.037 [geometric standard error of the mean, GSEM = 0.210] mg/ml) and losartan (2.098 [GSEM, 0.239] mg/ml) were identical (p = 0.840), the geometric mean PC(35)-PEF(40) values significantly (p = 0.034) increased from 0.258 (GSEM, 0.156) mg/ml with placebo to 0.456 (GSEM, 0.186) mg/ml with losartan. We conclude that AT1 receptors are involved in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. This is the first report demonstrating the involvement of AT1 receptors in bronchial asthma.

Effect of infused angiotensin II on the bronchoconstrictor activity of inhaled endothelin-1 in asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a potent bronchoconstrictor, and asthmatics demonstrate bronchial hyperresponsiveness to ET-1 given by inhalation. Angiotensin II (Ang II) is increased in plasma in acute severe asthma, causes bronchoconstriction in asthmatics, and potentiates contractions induced by ET-1 in bovine bronchial smooth muscle in vitro, and contractions induced by methacholine both in vitro and in vivo. We wished to examine any potentiation of the bronchoconstrictor activity of inhaled ET-1 by infused Ang II at subbronchoconstrictor doses.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Asthma research unit in university hospital.

PATIENTS

Eight asthmatic subjects with baseline FEV1 88% predicted, bronchial hyperreactivity (geometric mean, concentration of methacholine producing 20% fall, methacholine PC20 2.5 mg/mL), and mean age 37.1 years.

INTERVENTIONS

We examined the effect of subbronchoconstrictor doses of infused Ang II (1 ng/kg/min and 2 ng/kg/min) or placebo on bronchoconstrictor responses to inhaled ET-1 (dose range, 0.96 to 15.36 nmol).

MEASUREMENTS

Oxygen saturation, noninvasive BP, and spirometric measurements were made throughout the study visits. Blood was sampled for plasma Ang II levels at baseline and before and after ET-1 inhalation.

RESULTS

Ang II infusion did not produce bronchoconstriction per se at either dose prior to ET-1 challenge. Bronchial challenge with inhaled ET-1 produced dose-dependent bronchoconstriction, but there was no difference in bronchial responsiveness to ET-1 comparing infusion of placebo with Ang II at 1 ng/kg/min or 2 ng/kg/min (geometric mean, concentration of ET-1 producing 15% fall, 5.34 nmol, 4.95 nmol, and 4.96 nmol, respectively) (analysis of variance, p > 0.05). There was an increase in systolic and diastolic BP at the higher dose of Ang II compared to placebo (mean 136/86 vs 117/75 mm Hg, respectively). Plasma Ang II was elevated following infusion of both doses of Ang II compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the potentiating effect on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, Ang II at subbronchoconstrictor doses does not potentiate ET-1-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma.