Peak inspiratory flow through Turbuhaler in chronic obstructive airways disease

Comparative study of the inhalation parameters of COPD patients through NEXThaler® and Ellipta® dry powder inhalers

The deposition of dry powder aerosol drugs depends on the inhalation parameters of the patients through the inhaler. These data are not directly measured in clinical practice. Their prediction based on the routinely measured spirometric data could help in choosing the appropriate device and optimizing the therapy. The aim of this study was to perform inhalation experiments to find correlations between inhalation parameters of COPD patients through two DPI devices and their native spirometric data, gender, age and disease severity. Another goal was to establish relationships between peak inspiratory flows through NEXThaler® and Ellipta® inhalers and their statistical determinants. Breathing parameters of 113 COPD patients were measured by normal spirometry and while inhaling through the two DPIs. Statistical analysis of the measured data was performed. The average values of peak inspiratory flow through the devices (PIFdev) were 68.4 L/min and 78.0 L/min for NEXThaler® and Ellipta®, respectively. PIFdev values were significantly higher for males than for females, but differences upon age, BMI and disease severity group were not significant. PIFdev values correlated best with their native spirometric counterparts (PIF) and linear relationships between them were revealed. Current results may be used in the future to predict the success of inhalation of COPD patients through DPI devices, which may help in the inhaler choice. By choosing the appropriate device-drug pair for each patient the lung dose can be increased and the efficiency of the therapy improved. Further results of the clinical study will be the subject of a next publication.

Dry Powder Inhalers: From Bench to Bedside

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are now widely prescribed and preferred by the majority of patients. These devices have many advantages over the traditional pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) but they do have disadvantages. The characteristics of the dose emitted from a DPI are affected by the inhalation manoeuvre used by a patient. Each patient is different and the severity of their lung disease varies from mild to very severe. This affects how they use an inhaler and so determines the type of dose they inhale. An understanding of the pharmaceutical science related to DPIs is important to appreciate the relevance of how patients inhale through these devices. Also, each type of DPI has its unique dose preparation routine, and thus it is essential to follow these recommended steps because errors at this stage may result in no dose being inhaled. All issues related to the inhalation manoeuvre and dose preparation are addressed in this chapter. The importance of the inhalation technique is highlighted with a realization of inhale technique training and checking. During routine patient management, devices should not be switched nor doses increased unless the patient has demonstrated that they can and do use their DPI.

Inhalation Profiles Through a Dry Powder Inhaler: Relation Between Inhalation Technique and Spirometric Measures

Background: The understanding of the real flow profiles through a dry powder inhaler (DPI), generated by asthma patients, is a prerequisite for satisfactory drug delivery to the lungs. The aims of the study were to assess the relationship between spirometric measures and inhalation profiles through a low-resistance DPI, and to compare parameters of those profiles between optimal and suboptimal inhalation technique type. Methods: Both healthy adult volunteers and patients with asthma were included in the study. Spirometry was conducted along with modified flow-volume test to detect expiratory levels (maximum "100%" exhalation to residual volume [RV] and halfway "50%" to RV). These were the reference levels of the depth of exhalation for each patient to simulate the effect of incomplete exhalation. Individual inhalation profiles were recorded using spirometry in-house software as the volumetric airflow through the inhaler versus time. Inspiratory flow parameters were extracted: time to peak inspiratory flow through inhaler (PIF_inh), time at which peak inspiratory flow occurs (tPIF_inh), total inhalation time (T), and inhaled volume during maneuver (V). Results and Conclusions: There are significant relationships between spirometric indices and parameters of inhalation through a low-resistance, cyclohaler-type DPI (assessed by single-factor analysis of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). Multiple regression models were constructed, predicting inspiratory flow parameters (including spirometric indices, demographic parameters, and inhaler's usage history as determinants). The exhalation halfway to RV before inhalation did not affect significantly PIF_inh and tPIF_inh (and, thus, initial flow dynamics) in asthma patients. T and V parameters were then significantly decreased, but seemed sufficient for successful DPI performance. Both exhalation to RV and incomplete exhalation halfway to RV preceding inhalation allow for effective usage of low-resistance DPI.

Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

Background

The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials.

Methods

The replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations.

Results

A total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF.

Conclusion

Nearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities.

What to consider before prescribing inhaled medications: a pragmatic approach for evaluating the current inhaler landscape

Inhaled therapies are the cornerstone of treatment in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and there are a multitude of devices available. There is, however, a distinct lack of evidence-based guidance for healthcare providers on how to choose an appropriate inhaler. This review aims to summarise recent updates on topics related to inhaler choice, and to offer practical considerations for healthcare providers regarding currently marketed devices. The importance of choosing the right inhaler for the right patient is discussed, and the relative merits of dry powder inhalers, pressurised metered dose inhalers, breath-actuated pressurised metered dose inhalers, spacers and soft mist inhalers are considered. Compiling the latest studies in the devices therapy area, this review focuses on the most common types of handling errors, as well as the comparative rates of incorrect inhalation technique between devices. The impact of device-specific handling errors on inhaler performance is also discussed, and the characteristics that can impair optimal drug delivery, such as inhalation flow rate, inhalation volume and particle size, are compared between devices. The impact of patient perceptions, behaviours and problems with inhalation technique is analysed, and the need for appropriate patient education is also highlighted. The continued development of technology in inhaler design and the need to standardise study assessment, endpoints and patient populations are identified as future research needs. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Prevalence and factors associated with suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rates in COPD

Purpose

Adequate peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) is required for drug dispersion with dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Prevalence of PIFR discordance (suboptimal PIFR with prescribed inhalers) and factors influencing device-specific PIFR are unclear in COPD. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of PIFR discordance and associated clinical factors in a stable COPD population.

Patients and methods

An observational, single-center, cohort study was conducted including 66 outpatients with COPD. PIFR was measured using the In-Check™ Dial with applied resistance of prescribed inhalers. Participants were defined as discordant if measured PIFR was <30 L/min and <60 L/min for high and low–medium resistance devices, respectively, using an inspiratory effort the participant normally used with their prescribed DPI.

Results

The median age of the COPD participants was 69.4 years, 92% were white and 47% were female. A total of 48% were using low–medium resistance DPIs (Diskus^®/Ellipta^®) and 76% used high-resistance DPI (Handihaler^®). A total of 40% of COPD participants were discordant to prescribed inhalers. Female gender was the only factor consistently associated with lower PIFR. Shorter height was associated with reduced PIFR for low–medium resistance (r=0.44; P=0.01), but not high resistance (r=0.20; P=0.16). There was no correlation between PIFR by In-Check™ dial and PIFR measured by standard spirometer.

Conclusion

PIFR is reduced in stable COPD patients, with female gender being the only factor consistently associated with reduced PIFR. Discordance with prescribed inhalers was seen in 40% of COPD patients, suggesting that many COPD patients do not generate adequate inspiratory force to overcome prescribed DPIs resistance in the course of normal use.

Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Implications for Dry Powder Inhalers

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States with a significant economic burden related to hospital admissions for exacerbations. One of the primary treatment modalities for COPD is medications delivered through breath-actuated dry powdered inhalers (DPIs). For users to successfully receive inhaled medication, they must inhale with enough flow to overcome the internal resistance of the device, leading to deaggregation of the medication powder. Peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) is the maximal flow rate obtained during an inspiratory maneuver. PIFR measurement can be impacted by the internal resistance of the device, which varies with device design. Many devices require a PIFR >60 L/min for adequate medication dispersal, while others appear to have adequate drug deaggregation with a PIFR >30 L/min. Studies have shown PIFRs are reduced among females and decrease with age, without a clear correlation between forced expiratory volume in 1 second and PIFR. PIFR can be reduced at the time of COPD exacerbation. Recent data suggest that reduced PIFR may be associated with worse COPD-related symptom burden, increased odds of COPD-related hospital readmissions, and improved responsiveness to nebulized therapy. This review article aims to examine the physiology and clinical correlations of PIFR, as well as review published studies related to PIFR with DPIs used to treat COPD.

Peak inspiratory flow rate measurement by using In-Check DIAL for the different inhaler devices in elderly with obstructive airway diseases

Background

Inhaler device technique is a common cause of treatment failure in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dry powder inhaler (DPI) requires optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) for drug delivery. Low PIFR generation is common in the elderly. Patient lung function and intrinsic inhaler resistance are factors for determining generated PIFR and drug delivery from DPI.

Objectives

We aimed to identify the PIFR of the older (aged >60 years) and the younger (aged ≤60 years) patients with obstructive airway diseases for the different inhaler devices (Turbuhaler^® and Accuhaler).

Patients and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to December 2014. Patients with obstructive airway diseases were recruited. Spirometry was performed. PIFR was measured by using an In-Check DIAL device. Individual PIFR values for each inhaler device were obtained for three consecutive measurements and then averaged.

Results

A total of 139 patients diagnosed with obstructive lung diseases (asthma, n = 109; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, n = 30) were recruited. Of these, 71 patients (51%) were >60 years. The PIFR generated by the patients who were ≤60 years for nonresistance mode was not different from that generated by those aged >60 years (115.0 ± 15.2 L/min vs 115.4 ± 13.3 L/min, p = 0.86). Regarding the DPI, PIFR generated from the older group was significantly lower than that generated from the younger group for Turbuhaler (72.5 ± 18.8 L/min vs 82.4 ± 21.1 L/min, p = 0.01), but the PIFR generated was not significantly different between the older and the younger groups for the Accuhaler (93.8 ± 22.9 L/min vs 99.4 ± 24.2 L/min, p = 0.86). The low peak expiratory flow rate and PIFR from spirometry were associated with the suboptimal PIFR measured by using In-Check DIAL.

Discussion

Optimal PIFR is critical for DPI use in the elderly; appropriate DPI selection is essential for management. In-Check DIAL may be useful for detecting inhaler device problem among the elderly.

Conclusion

Lower PIFR generated from Turbuhaler was noted in patients with airway diseases who were older than 60 years, when compared to the younger patients.

Performance of Turbuhaler((R)) in Patients with Acute Airway Obstruction and COPD, and in Children with Asthma : Understanding the Clinical Importance of Adequate Peak Inspiratory Flow, High Lung Deposition, and Low In Vivo Dose Variability

The dry-powder inhaler (DPI) Turbuhaler((R)) has been on the market for nearly two decades. Products containing terbutaline, formoterol, budesonide, and the combination budesonide/formoterol are widely used by patients with asthma and COPD. Most patients and physicians find Turbuhaler((R)) easy to use, and local side effects are rare. This is thought to arise from the lack of additives or only small amounts in the formulation, in addition to minimal deposition of the drug in the oropharynx and on the vocal cords during inspiration.The function of Turbuhaler((R)) has frequently been questioned. This article aims to review and clarify some key issues that have been challenged in the literature (e.g. the effectiveness of Turbuhaler((R)) in patients with more restricting conditions), to discuss the importance of lung deposition, and to explain the low in vivo variability associated with Turbuhaler((R)) and the lack of correlation with the higher in vitro variability.Turbuhaler((R)), like other DPIs, is flow dependent to some degree. However, a peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through Turbuhaler((R)) of 30 L/min gives a good clinical effect. These PIF values can be obtained by patients with conditions thought to be difficult to manage with inhalational agents, such as asthmatic children and adult patients with acute severe airway obstruction and COPD. Excellent clinical results with Turbuhaler((R)) in large controlled studies in patients with COPD and acute severe airway obstruction provide indirect evidence that medication delivered via Turbuhaler((R)) reaches the target organ.Due to the large amount of small particles and the moderate inbuilt resistance in Turbuhaler((R)), which opens up the vocal cords during inhalation, Turbuhaler((R)) is associated with a high lung deposition (25-40% of the delivered dose) compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and other DPIs. A good correlation has been found between lung deposition and clinical efficacy. A high lung deposition always results in the best ratio between clinical efficacy and risk of unwanted systemic activity. Studies with Turbuhaler((R)) also show that the in vivo variation in lung deposition is significantly lower compared with a pMDI or, for example, the Diskus((R)) inhaler, and much lower than the in vitro dose variability seen in laboratory tests. Turbuhaler((R)) appears to be a reliable DPI which can be used with confidence by patients with airway diseases, including those with clinical conditions believed to be difficult to manage with inhalational therapy.

Inhalation characteristics of asthma patients, COPD patients and healthy volunteers with the Spiromax® and Turbuhaler® devices: a randomised, cross-over study

BACKGROUND

Spiromax® is a novel dry-powder inhaler containing formulations of budesonide plus formoterol (BF). The device is intended to provide dose equivalence with enhanced user-friendliness compared to BF Turbuhaler® in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study was performed to compare inhalation parameters with empty versions of the two devices, and to investigate the effects of enhanced training designed to encourage faster inhalation.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, cross-over study included children with asthma (n = 23), adolescents with asthma (n = 27), adults with asthma (n = 50), adults with COPD (n = 50) and healthy adult volunteers (n = 50). Inhalation manoeuvres were recorded with each device after training with the patient information leaflet (PIL) and after enhanced training using an In-Check Dial device.

RESULTS

After PIL training, peak inspiratory flow (PIF), maximum change in pressure (∆P) and the inhalation volume (IV) were significantly higher with Spiromax than with the Turbuhaler device (p values were at least <0.05 in all patient groups). After enhanced training, numerically or significantly higher values for PIF, ∆P, IV and acceleration remained with Spiromax versus Turbuhaler, except for ∆P in COPD patients. After PIL training, one adult asthma patient and one COPD patient inhaled <30 L/min through the Spiromax compared to one adult asthma patient and five COPD patients with the Turbuhaler. All patients achieved PIF values of at least 30 L/min after enhanced training.

CONCLUSIONS

The two inhalers have similar resistance so inhalation flows and pressure changes would be expected to be similar. The higher flow-related values noted for Spiromax versus Turbuhaler after PIL training suggest that Spiromax might have human factor advantages in real-world use. After enhanced training, the flow-related differences between devices persisted; increased flow rates were achieved with both devices, and all patients achieved the minimal flow required for adequate drug delivery. Enhanced training could be useful, especially in COPD patients.

Which factors affect the choice of the inhaler in chronic obstructive respiratory diseases?

Inhalation is the preferred route of drug administration in chronic respiratory diseases because it optimises delivery of the active compounds to the targeted site and minimises side effects from systemic distribution. The choice of a device should be made after careful evaluation of the patient's clinical condition (degree of airway obstruction, comorbidities), as well as their ability to coordinate the inhalation manoeuvre and to generate sufficient inspiratory flow. These patient factors must be aligned with the specific advantages and limitations of each inhaler when making this important choice. Finally, adherence to treatment is not the responsibility of the patient alone, but should be shared also by clinicians. Clinicians have access to a wide selection of pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs) that can be used effectively when matched to the needs of individual patients; this should be perceived as an opportunity rather than a limitation.

The inhalation characteristics of patients when they use different dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of each inhalation maneuver when patients use dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are important, because they control the quality of the emitted dose.

METHODS

We have measured the inhalation profiles of asthmatic children [CHILD; n=16, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 79% predicted], asthmatic adults (ADULT; n=53, mean predicted FEV1 72%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; n=29, mean predicted FEV1 42%) patients when they inhaled through an Aerolizer, Diskus, Turbuhaler, and Easyhaler using their "real-life" DPI inhalation technique. These are low-, medium-, medium/high-, and high-resistance DPIs, respectively. The inhalation flow against time was recorded to provide the peak inhalation flow (PIF; in L/min), the maximum pressure change (ΔP; in kPa), acceleration rates (ACCEL; in kPa/sec), time to maximum inhalation, the length of each inhalation (in sec), and the inhalation volume (IV; in liters) of each inhalation maneuver.

RESULTS

PIF, ΔP, and ACCEL values were consistent with the order of the inhaler's resistance. For each device, the inhalation characteristics were in the order ADULT>COPD>CHILD for PIF, ΔP, and ACCEL (p<0.001). The results showed a large variability in inhalation characteristics and demonstrate the advantages of ΔP and ACCEL rather than PIFs. Overall inhaled volumes were low, and only one patient achieved an IV >4 L and ΔP >4 kPa.

CONCLUSION

The large variability of these inhalation characteristics and their range highlights that if inhalation profiles were used with compendial in vitro dose emission measurements, then the results would provide useful information about the dose patients inhale during routine use. The inhalation characteristics highlight that adults with asthma have greater inspiratory capacity than patients with COPD, whereas children with asthma have the lowest. The significance of the inhaled volume to empty doses from each device requires investigation.

Reduced Peak Inspiratory Effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) due to Mishandling is Common in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVES

A minimum peak inspiratory flow (PIF) through dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is required for effective drug delivery to the lungs. Some patients are unable to generate the minimally effective PIF through the DPI. However, little information is available about the 'real life' prevalence of reduced peak inspiratory effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) as a result of mishandling

METHODS

We investigated peak inhalation effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) by both direct observation and the In-Check Dial((R)), a portable PIF meter, in a large sample of patients consecutively referred to our laboratory who were familiar with these devices. Patients with reduced peak inspiratory effort repeated the PIF measurement after a session of instruction on the need for more forceful effort through the device.

RESULTS

We studied 644 patients (mean age 62 years, 42% female). Of these, 62% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 35% had asthma. The mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 53% of predicted. 502 patients were using the Diskus((R)) and 185 the Turbuhaler((R)). Overall, 106 patients (16.5%) showed weak inhalation by direct observation at baseline. Of 44 subjects with weak inhalation through the Turbuhaler((R)), 34 (77%) demonstrated a PIF <30 L/min. Post-counselling, only four patients did not achieve a PIF of at least 30 L/min (p < 0.01). Of 62 subjects with weak inhalation through the Diskus((R)), 37 (60%) had a PIF <30 L/min. Post-counselling, all these subjects achieved a PIF of at least 30 L/min (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A significant number of patients show a reduced peak inspiratory effort through the Diskus((R)) and the Turbuhaler((R)) in real life. Our results indicate that the cause of this deficiency is often mishandling of the device because, after a brief session of instruction on the need for more forceful inhalation, most patients obtained an acceptable PIF rate. A PIF meter may identify patients with inadequately weak inhalation and offer useful feedback for obtaining the best inspiratory effort.

Prevalence and COPD phenotype for a suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate against the simulated resistance of the Diskus® dry powder inhaler

BACKGROUND

Patients who exhibit a suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) against the resistance (resist) of a dry powder inhaler (DPI) may not be able to effectively inhale the medication into their lower respiratory tract. PIFRresist was measured using the In-Check DIAL(®) to simulate the resistance of the Diskus(®) DPI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who were ≥ 60 years of age and had forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of ≤ 50% predicted. Our objectives were to: establish the prevalence of a suboptimal PIFRresist (< 60 L/min) in this population; identify a phenotype of patients with COPD who exhibit a suboptimal PIFRresist; and assess test-retest reliability of PIFRresist.

METHODS

PIFRresist and inspiratory capacity (IC) were measured after spirometry was performed in patients with advanced COPD. Repeat measurement of PIFRresist was performed in a subset of patients who returned for scheduled follow-up appointments.

RESULTS

The prevalence of a PIFRresist of <60 L/min was 19% among 213 patients. The clinical phenotype of these 41 patients included predominantly female gender (80%), shorter height, and lower values for forced vital capacity (FVC) and IC as percentage predicted compared with the 172 patients with PIFRresist of > 60 L/min. Multivariate regression analysis performed on all patients demonstrated that age, gender, height, FVC % predicted, and IC % predicted were independent predictors of PIFRresist (R(2)=36%). Repeat testing showed no difference between the PIFRresist values.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one out of five patients with advanced COPD and ≥ 60 years of age exhibited a suboptimal PIFRresist against the Diskus. For the first time, a clinical phenotype of such patients with a suboptimal PIFRresist was identified. It is reasonable to measure a patient's PIFR against the simulated resistance of a specific DPI if there is concern about clinical benefit using the dry powder medication.

Evaluation of the use of inhaled medications by hospital inpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Patients with COPD are treated with a variety of inhaled medications. Previous studies evaluating inhaler technique have had varied results but have generally found high rates of misuse of these devices. There is a paucity of studies of inhaler technique focusing on North American patients with COPD who have been admitted to hospital.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inhaler technique of patients with COPD who have been admitted to hospital and to identify baseline patient characteristics and/or inhaler devices associated with poor inhaler technique.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of COPD who were admitted to the hospitalist or internal medicine service at a tertiary care hospital in British Columbia between October 2010 and April 2011 were identified. After giving informed consent, recruited patients demonstrated their inhaler technique, which was evaluated with standardized checklists. Errors in technique were categorized as either noncritical or critical. Critical errors were defined as those resulting in little or no medication reaching the lungs.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (mean age 78 years) participated in the study. Twenty-two (59%) of the patients made critical errors while demonstrating their inhaler technique. Patients using metered-dose inhalers were more likely to make a critical error than patients using other inhalers (13/14 [93%] versus 9/23 [39%]; relative risk 2.38, p = 0.002). On average, 26% of the steps for using an inhaler were performed incorrectly. Twenty-three (62%) of the patients reported having received previous counselling on inhaler technique, but only 13 (57%) of these 23 patients had received such counselling in the previous 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the patients in this study misused their inhaler devices, and many made critical errors that would result in inadequate amounts of drug reaching the lung. Many of the patients were not receiving regular counselling on appropriate inhaler technique. Health care professionals should be aware of poor inhaler technique, should routinely evaluate their patients' inhaler technique, and should provide counselling.

Inspiratory flows through dry powder inhaler in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: age and gender rather than severity matters

BACKGROUND

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are inspiratory flow driven and hence flow dependent. Most patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are elderly and have poor lung function. The factors affecting their inspiratory flows through inhalers are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To study peak inspiratory flows (PIFs) and their determinants through a DPI in COPD patients of varying age and severity.

METHODS

Flow-volume spirometry was performed in 93 COPD patients. Maximum PIF rates were recorded through an empty Easyhaler (PIF(EH); Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland), a DPI that provides consistent dose delivery at inhalation rates through the inhaler of 28 L/min or higher.

RESULTS

The mean PIF(EH) was 54 L/min (range 26-95 L/min) with a coefficient of variation of 7%. All but two patients were able to generate a flow of > or = 28 L/min. In a general linear model, the independent determinants for PIF(EH) were age (P = 0.02) and gender (P = 0.01), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) expressed as percent predicted was not a significant factor. The regression model accounted only for 18% of the variation in PIF(EH).

CONCLUSION

In patients with COPD, age and gender are more important determinants of inspiratory flow through DPIs than the degree of expiratory airway obstruction. Most COPD patients with varying age and severity are able to generate inspiratory flows through the test inhaler that is sufficient for optimal drug delivery to the lower airways.

Eformoterol n-of-1 trials in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease poorly reversible to salbutamol

AIMS

Benefits of long acting beta 2 agonists are unclear for severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with poor response to short acting bronchodilators. We aimed to evaluate 1) effects of eformoterol in such patients using a 'n-of-1' double crossover study design, and 2) aggregate data as a double-blind, double crossover randomized control trial.

METHODS

Subjects with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 60% predicted, and poor response to short acting bronchodilators were studied six times over 18 weeks. During that time they were prescribed four weeks of either eformoterol or placebo, followed by the alternate, and then a second crossover. Four-weekly measures included six minute walk distance (6MWD), FEV1, previous two weeks of symptoms, and chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ) including treatment goal items.

RESULTS

Of 27 original subjects (21 male, mean age of 70 years, five smokers, mean prebronchodilator FEV1 36% predicted), one subject had clinically significant concordant improvement in the CRQ dyspnoea domain and 6MWD (by 51 metres), but not for other outcomes. There were no concordant improvements in any other subjects. Aggregate double crossover data analysis demonstrated no improvement in any outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'n-of-1' study design and aggregate data analysis demonstrated lack of benefit from eformoterol in COPD patients with poor response to short acting bronchodilators.

Factors guiding the choice of delivery device for inhaled corticosteroids in the long-term management of stable asthma and COPD: focus on budesonide

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) have become the mainstay of chronic controller therapy to treat airways inflammation in asthma and to reduce exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An array of ICSs are now available that are aerosolized by a range of delivery systems. Such devices include pressurized (or propellant) metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), pMDIs plus valved holding chambers or spacers, breath-actuated inhalers, and nebulizers. More recently, dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) were developed to help overcome problems of hand-breath coordination associated with pMDIs. The clinical benefit of ICSs therapy is determined by a complex interplay between the nature and severity of the disease, the type of drug and its formulation, and characteristics of the delivery device together with the patient's ability to use the device correctly. The ICSs budesonide is available by pMDI, DPI, and nebulizer-allowing the physician to select the best device for each individual patient. Indeed, the availability of budesonide in three different delivery systems allows versatility for the prescribing physician and provides continuity of drug therapy for younger patients who may remain on the same ICSs as they mature.

The course of inhalation profiles during an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with increased airflow Limitation, hyperinflation and respiratory muscle fatigue. It is unclear, whether patients are able to perform adequate inhalations through various inhalation devices with different orfices during an exacerbation. The aim of this study was to examine the evolution of inhalation profiles of patients inhaling through Diskus, Turbuhaler, pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and Volumatic and consequently the appropriateness of using the various devices during an exacerbation.

MEASUREMENTS

15 hospitalized patients participated in this randomized comparison of inhalation profiles through the four placebo-devices. For each device, triplicate inhalation profiles were recorded during day 1-9 of admission and in stable phase (day 50).

RESULTS

The mean percentage of patients performing optimum inhalation profiles was 100% for Diskus, 60% for Turbuhaler, 14% for pMDI and 87% for Volumatic over the interval of day 1-9 and day 50. Patients with an inspiratory muscle strength (MIP) of less than 6kPa were generally unable to generate the optimum flow through the Turbuhaler (>60 l/min).

CONCLUSION

The Diskus and Volumatic can be used effectively in the acute phase of an exacerbation of asthma or COPD. The Turbuhaler could be optimally used after the fifth day of convalescence. The pMDI is rather unsuitable during an exacerbation.

Inhalation profiles in asthmatics and COPD patients: reproducibility and effect of instruction

Turbuhaler and Salbutamol-Diskus produce therapeutic doses at peak inspiratory flow (PIF) of >30 L/min. However, the optimum flow for Fluticasone-Diskus and Turbuhaler, in terms of total emitted dose and fine particle mass, is >60 L/min. The Turbuhaler achieved a higher output at this flow, as compared to Diskus. For pMDI 25 < PIF < 90 L/min, an actuation time of 0.0-0.2 sec is optimal. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of optimum inhalation profiles, the effect of instruction, reproducibility, and the relationship between inhalation profiles and patient characteristics in stable asthmatics and mild/moderate/severe COPD patients. For each device, triplicate inhalation profiles were recorded during 6 sessions in a 10-week period. All patients achieved PIF > 30 L/min using Diskus. After instruction, all Diskus inhalations were performed with >60 L/min, except 7% of the inhalations of the severe COPD patients. At least 95% of the Turbuhaler inhalations was also performed with the minimum flow; however, 19% of the inhalations of the severe COPD patients were not optimally performed. The hand-lung coordination was inadequate in 40% of pMDI inhalation profiles, and 80% was performed with a too high flow. The reproducibility of PIF of both dry powder inhalers (DPIs) was very high (coefficient of variation = 4-10%). The reproducibility of the pMDI variables was lower (coefficient of variation = 9-18%). The major lung function variables predictive for PIF(diskus) and PIF(turbuhaler) were maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP), PIF, and inspiratory capacity. No significant predictive lung function variables for PIF(pMDI) were found. Most patients performed reproducible optimum inhalation profiles through Diskus and Turbuhaler. However, in the severe COPD group, 7-19% of the patients were not able to generate the optimum flows through the DPIs. For these patients, a flow-independent aerosol delivery system might be more suitable. The majority of patients were using the pMDI incorrectly. Instruction had no effect. So, we concluded that the pMDI should not be used in these patient groups because of the coordination problems.

The inhalation manager: a new computer-based device to assess inhalation technique and drug delivery to the patient

The rational choice of an inhalation device is a cornerstone in the effective management of asthma and COPD. In this publication, we describe the development of a new system, the Inhalation Manager, which, for the first time, offers the possibility to assess the entire inhalation maneuver of patients using original devices under everyday conditions. So far the Inhalation Manager allows the measurement of inspiratory maneuvers of patients through placebo inhalation devices of the most common breath-actuated CFC-free inhalers in the market for the three main glucocorticosteroids Budesonide [Turbohaler (TH), dry powder inhaler (DPI)], Beclomethasone dipropionate [Autohaler (AH), breath-actuated pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)], and Fluticasone propionate [Diskus (DI), DPI] by means of a pneumotachometer. In addition, it allows allocation of the individual maneuver to the expected drug delivery values (mass output and particle size distribution) of these three devices. In a field trial, the inhalation technique of 628 (TH), 794 (AH), and 795 (DI) patients, respectively, was tested in 72 pulmonologist practices with the Inhalation Manager. For patients in the 18-59-year-old group, the Inhalation Manager detected the following percentages needing improvement: 1.5% for the Autohaler device, 16.7% for the Diskus, and 38.9% for the Turbohaler. In the 60-99-year-old group, percentages needing improvement were 1.5%, 31.5%, and 66.1% for the Autohaler, Diskus, and Turbohaler, respectively. Therefore, the Inhalation Manager could become an essential tool in asthma management by finding the most suitable inhaler for an individual patient and by training the optimal inhalation technique.

In vitro and in vivo aspects of quantifying intrapulmonary deposition of a dry powder radioaerosol

Pulmonary delivery of pharmaceutical aerosols can be quantified using gamma scintigraphy. Technetium-99m, the most commonly used radionuclide in scintigraphic studies, cannot be incorporated into the drug molecule and, therefore, may be distributed differently from the drug itself, particularly if the drug is presented as a solid in a liquid suspension or as a dry powder formulation. This study demonstrated the importance of using conditions relevant to the in vivo situation in the in vitro characterisation of a dry powder aerosol of 99mTc-labelled lactose. The influence of inspiratory flow on the distribution of aerosol within the lungs was investigated in eight healthy subjects who inhaled the 99mTc-labelled lactose at four flows (30,40,60 and 80 l/min). No differences in penetration index (PI) or count density distribution of radioactivity were seen, indicating that regional distribution of aerosol in healthy airways was insensitive to differences in the inspiratory effort exerted by the subject while inhaling the experimental dry powder radioaerosol.

On the use of dry powder inhalers in situations perceived as constrained

Dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are dependent on the inhalation effort of the patient. Some patient groups, including asthmatic children, patients with acute asthma, and patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are perceived as having problems in readily inhaling from a DPI in an efficient way; this opinion is based on alleged low inhalation flows. A review of the literature however shows that these groups can use a DPI in an efficient way and gain good clinical effect from its use. Particularly, it has been shown that children can generate a good peak inhalation flow through a DPI, albeit a lower inhaled volume. Similarly, patients with acute asthma can use a DPI in an efficient way, even reaching a better clinical effect with the DPI than with a pressurized metered dose inhaler with a spacer. Finally, it was shown that patients with severe COPD can generate the inhalation flows needed to generate an efficient drug aerosol from a DPI. Collectively, the discussed patient groups seem to perform as well as other subjects when it comes to their ability to generate an adequate inhalation flow through a DPI.

Effective delivery of particles with the HandiHaler dry powder inhalation system over a range of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity

The HandiHaler is a dry powder breath activated inhaler system developed for inhalation therapy for patients with airway disease. Its operation is based on the evacuation of powder from a pierced capsule. We sought to document the inspiratory flow rates attained by patients inspiring through the HandiHaler with various degrees of airflow limitation. Subjects with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were the study's population. An in vitro study of fine particle dose was conducted using an Andersen Cascade Impactor to assess medication delivery at low inspiratory flow rates. Subsequently, an in vivo study was conducted to determine inspiratory flow rates in patients with COPD as measured through a pneumotach with a custom coupler device with and without the HandiHaler. Patients were classified into three approximately equal groups of spirometric severity ranging from mild (46-65% predicted normal forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1]), to moderate (28-45%) to severe (< or = 27%). The in vitro study indicated delivery of medication at flow rates as low as 20 L/min. Twenty-six men completed the in vivo study (age 66.9 +/- 10.9 years, FEV1 = 1.02 +/- 0.45 l.). The median peak inspiratory flow rates attained in the mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 10), and severe (n = 8) categories were 45, 45.6, and 35.4 L/min respectively. The minimum peak inspiratory flow rates in the three groups were 28.2, 21.6 and 20.4 L/min. The HandiHaler device effectively delivers particles to the lung over a wide range of airflow limitation in patients with COPD.

Measurement of peak inhalation rates with an in-check meter to identify an elderly patient's ability to use a turbuhaler

Dry powder inhalers are designed with resistance to airflow so that a respirable cloud of particles is generated during inhalation. Some of these devices require a certain inhalation rate to produce a consistent dose of respirable particles. The aim of the study was to determine the inhalation rate of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) when they inhale through a Turbuhaler and assess the potential of the In-Check Meter to identify inhalation rates. Their peak inhalation rate using a normal inhalation, pre- and post-counselling, was measured using a Turbuhaler Trainer and an In-Check Meter. Spirometry was also measured. Seventy-four COPD patients with a mean (SD) age of 79.7 (8.4) years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 41.9 (12.8)% predicted. Pre-counselling 14 obtained a rate of <30 l min(-1) with the Turbuhaler Trainer, 31 from 30 to 40 min(-1), 23 between 40-60 l min(-1) and 6 > 60 l min(-1). The median (range) peak inhalation rates with the In-Check Meter were 50 (50-70), 70 (50-130), 100 (60-200) and 225 (200-250) l min(-1). Post-counselling 7, 16,41 and 10 achieved the respective peak inhalation rates using the Turbuhaler Trainer Similarly the In-Check inhalation rates were 50 (50-60), 70 (50-130), 90 (60-200) and 250 (200-270) l min(-1). The results highlight the potential of the In-Check Meter to identify patients' inhalation rates through dry powder inhalers.

Latest advances in the development of dry powder inhalers

The current market for dry powder inhalers (DPIs) has over 20 devices in present use and at least another 30 under development. Clinicians recognize that DPIs are a suitable alternative to pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) for some patients but the relative performance of devices is often unclear. The problem is compounded by the need to reformulate pMDIs with new propellants, introducing further products to the market with associated variations in performance. This article reviews the DPIs currently available, the driving forces governing new designs, and the claimed advantages of DPIs in the development pipeline.

Characterization of the inspiratory manoeuvre when asthmatics inhale through a Turbohaler pre- and post-counselling in a community pharmacy

Dose emission from a Turbohaler has been shown to be dependent on the rate of inhalation, with an optimal flow of 60 l min(-1) recommended. Some patients may need counselling to achieve this fast inhalation. Inhalation rate profiles of 24 asthmatics were measured when they inhaled through a placebo Turbohaler. The setting was a community pharmacy when the asthmatics came to collect their next supply of medication. Profiles were measured before and after counselling on how to use the Turbohaler. The mean (SD) peak inhalation rate through the Turbohaler pre- and post-counselling was 48.0 (16.8) and 54.7 (17.6) l min(-1), and their inspiratory volume was 1.75 (0.68) and 1.94 (0.62) l, respectively. Their mean (SD) percent predicted FEV1 was 57.0 (18.9)%. After counselling, 12 patients achieved an inhalation rate of > 60 l min(-1) and a further four obtained > 55 l min(-1). Emphasis should be placed on counselling patients prescribed all types of inhaled devices rather than concentrating on metered dose inhalers.