Fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FS-IMRT) for small acoustic neuromas

Epidemiology of vestibular schwannoma in the United States, 2004-2016

Background

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are nonmalignant tumors of the eighth cranial nerve and are the most common nonmalignant nerve sheath tumor. This study provides the most comprehensive and current analysis of VS epidemiology in the United States.

Methods

Incidence data were obtained from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, from 2004 to 2016 for VS. Age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIRs), rate ratios (AAIRRs), and prevalence ratios (AAPRs) per 100 000 were analyzed by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and laterality. Additional analyses were performed to assess differences in treatment, laterality, and diagnostic confirmation.

Results

Incidence of VS was highest among adults (aged 65–74 years, AAIR: 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.15–3.25). However, there was a much higher distribution of bilateral tumors compared to unilateral in children aged 0–19 years (28.5% vs 1.0%, P < .001). VS incidence was highest among white non-Hispanics (AAIR:1.30, 95% CI: 1.29–1. 31) and lowest among black non-Hispanics. Incidence of radiographically confirmed VS increased from 2004 to 2016 (annual percent change: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.15–3.16, P = .03). For treatment, 40.1% received surgery, while only 23.7% received radiation. There were an estimated 44 762 prevalent cases of VS in 2016 (AAPR: 12.17, 95% CI: 12.06–12.29).

Conclusions

VS incidence and prevalence are highest among adults and white non-Hispanics. Bilateral VS was more common among children. There was an increase of radiographically confirmed VS over time. A higher proportion of patients received surgical treatment than radiotherapy. Population-based statistics provide healthcare professionals with vital information regarding disease burden and help improve patient care.

Non-audiofacial morbidity after Gamma Knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma

OBJECT

While many studies have been published outlining morbidity following radiosurgical treatment of vestibular schwannomas, significant interpractitioner and institutional variability still exists. For this reason, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature for non-audiofacial-related morbidity after the treatment of vestibular schwannoma with radiosurgery.

METHODS

The authors performed a comprehensive search of the English-language literature to identify studies that published outcome data of patients undergoing radiosurgery treatment for vestibular schwannomas. In total, 254 articles were found that described more than 50,000 patients and were analyzed for satisfying the authors' inclusion criteria. Patients from these studies were then separated into 2 cohorts based on the marginal dose of radiation: < or = 13 Gy and > 13 Gy. All tumors included in this study were < 25 mm in their largest diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 63 articles met the criteria of the established search protocol, which combined for a total of 5631 patients. Patients receiving > 13 Gy were significantly more likely to develop trigeminal nerve neuropathy than those receiving < 13 Gy (p < 0.001). While we found no relationship between radiation dose and the rate of developing hydrocephalus (0.6% for both cohorts), patients with hydrocephalus who received doses > 13 Gy appeared to have a higher rate of symptomatic hydrocephalus requiring shunt treatment (96% [> 13 Gy] vs 56% [< or = 13 Gy], p < 0.001). The rates of vertigo or balance disturbance (1.1% [> 13 Gy] vs 1.8% [< or = 13 Gy], p = 0.001) and tinnitus (0.1% [> 13 Gy] vs 0.7% [< or = 13 Gy], p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the lower dose cohort than those in the higher dose cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our review of the literature provide a systematic summary of the published rates of nonaudiofacial morbidity following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Long-term results of stereotactic proton beam radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A retrospective study evaluating the role of hypofractionated stereotactic proton beam therapy for acoustic neuromas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 51 patients treated with hypofractionation (3 fractions) and followed up for a minimum of 2 years, were analyzed. Mean dose prescribed to ICRU reference point (isocenter) was 26 cobalt gray equivalent (CGyE) in 3 fractions. Mean minimum tumor dose was 21.4 CGyE/3. Cranial nerve functions were evaluated clinically. Serial MR Scans were used to evaluate local control.

RESULTS

With a mean clinical and radiological follow-up of 72 and 60 months respectively, the 5-year results showed a 98% local control, with a hearing preservation of 42%, a facial nerve preservation of 90.5% and a trigeminal nerve preservation of 93%.

CONCLUSION

For those patients harboring large acoustic neuromas that are inoperable, hypofractionated stereotactic proton beam offers long-term control with minimal side-effects.

CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors for pain control and quality of life

OBJECT

The authors conducted a study to assess safety, pain, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes following CyberKnife radiosurgical treatment of spinal tumors.

METHODS

Data obtained in all patients with spinal tumors who underwent CyberKnife radiosurgery at Georgetown University Hospital between March 2002 and March 2003 were analyzed. Patients underwent examination, visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessment, and completed the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months following treatment. Fifty-one patients with 72 lesions (58 metastatic and 14 primary) were treated. The mean follow-up period was 1 year. Pain was improved, with the mean VAS score decreasing significantly from 51.5 to 21.3 at 4 weeks (p < 0.001). This effect on pain was durable, with a mean score of 17.5 at 1 year, which was still significantly decreased (p = 0.002). Quality of life was maintained throughout the study period. After 18 months, physical well-being was 33 (initial score 32; p = 0.96) and mental well-being was 43.8 (initial score 44.2; p = 0.97). (The mean SF-12 score is 50 +/- 10 [standard deviation].) Adverse effects included self-limited dysphagia (three cases), diarrhea (two cases), lethargy (three cases), paresthesias (one case), and wound dehiscence (one case).

CONCLUSIONS

CyberKnife radiosurgery improves pain control and maintains QOL in patients treated for spinal tumors. Early adverse events are infrequent and minor. The authors await long-term follow-up data to determine late complications and tumor control rates.

Staged Stereotactic Irradiation for Acoustic Neuroma

OBJECTIVE:

Stereotactic radiosurgery has proven effective in the treatment of acoustic neuromas. Prior reports using single-stage radiosurgery consistently have shown excellent tumor control, but only up to a 50 to 73% likelihood of maintaining hearing at pretreatment levels. Staged, frame-based radiosurgery using 12-hour interfraction intervals previously has been shown by our group to achieve excellent tumor control while increasing the rate of hearing preservation at 2 years to 77%. The arrival of CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) image-guided radiosurgery now makes it more practical to treat acoustic neuroma with a staged approach. We hypothesize that such factors may further minimize injury of adjacent cranial nerves. In this retrospective study, we report our experience with staged radiosurgery for managing acoustic neuromas.

METHODS:

Since 1999, the CyberKnife has been used to treat more than 270 patients with acoustic neuroma at Stanford University. Sixty-one of these patients have now been followed up for a minimum of 36 months and form the basis for the present clinical investigation. Among the treated patients, the mean transverse tumor diameter was 18.5 mm, whereas the total marginal dose was either 18 or 21 Gy using three 6- or 7-Gy fractions. Audiograms and magnetic resonance imaging were obtained at 6-months intervals after treatment for the first 2 years and then annually thereafter.

RESULTS:

Of the 61 patients with a minimum of 36 months of follow-up (mean, 48 mo), 74% of patients with serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robinson Class 1–2) maintained serviceable hearing at the last follow-up, and no patient with at least some hearing before treatment lost all hearing on the treated side. Only one treated tumor (2%) progressed after radiosurgery; 29 (48%) of 61 decreased in size and 31 (50%) of the 61 tumors were stable. In no patients did new trigeminal dysfunction develop, nor did any patient experience permanent injury to their facial nerve; two patients experienced transient facial twitching that resolved in 3 to 5 months.

CONCLUSION:

Although still preliminary, these results indicate that improved tumor dose homogeneity and a staged treatment regimen may improve hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery.

Meningioma: Current treatment options and future directions

Benign meningiomas can be observed if not symptomatic or growing. When treatment is indicated, the options are surgery, radiosurgery, fractionated radiation therapy, or a combination of these modalities. Except in certain cases, such as large tumors that require debulking for relief of symptoms, we do not recommend the routine use of combination therapy. Intracranial meningiomas have usually been treated with surgical resection with an expected durable local control of 80% to 90% when a gross total resection (GTR) is obtained. Patients who have inoperable disease, refuse surgery, undergo less than a GTR, or who have aggressive histology should instead be considered candidates for radiation therapy or radiosurgery. While benign meningiomas can be successfully treated definitively or postoperatively with either fractionated radiation therapy or single fraction radiosurgery, atypical or malignant lesions are best treated with fractionated radiation therapy with conventional dosimetric margins. The role of systemic therapy is not yet defined, but multiple agents are being investigated in early phase trials for patients with recurrent or progressive disease after standard therapy has failed.

Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part I

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a novel conformal radiotherapy technique which is gaining increasing clinical use worldwide. This article aims to summarize the published data pertaining to clinical indications of this therapy for head and neck, central nervous system, and lung tumours. The main indications in head and neck cancer are parotid gland sparing and dose escalation to tumours close to organs at risk. For central nervous system tumours, IMRT has been used to reduce normal tissue radiation by more conformal dose distributions. To date, the majority of reports concern patients treated in the context of clinical trials, and for most tumour types longer term follow up of treated patients will be required to confirm the clinical benefits of IMRT.