Critically ill obstetric patients in the intensive care unit

Prediction of Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Risk Among Women with Medical Disorders Presenting to Emergency Obstetric care (EMOC): A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

Medical disorders complicating pregnancy have recently emerged as the most common cause for maternal morbidity and mortality and it is important to predict mortality risk when they present in moribund state to emergency obstetric care so as to take and timely effective measures to prevent mortality.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted over 6 months among pregnant and post-partum women with medical disorders who sought emergency obstetric care at a tertiary care hospital. Severity of morbidity was assessed using SOFA and APACHE II scores at admission.

Results

Of the 128 women, 87.5% were pregnant, and 12.5% were post-partum. Hypertensive disorders, cardiac disorders, neurological disorders and infective disorders were 24.2%, 22.6%, 14% and 9.4%, respectively. The optimal cut-off SOFA score was 2 (AUC = 0.739) with 66% sensitivity and 71% specificity and APACHE II score cut-off was 6 (AUC = 0.732) with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 78% in predicting severe maternal morbidity. The median scores of APACHE II and SOFA are 14 and 4, respectively, for non-survivors and for survivors it was 4 and 1.

Conclusion

Hypertensive disorder was the most common medical disorder, but severity was high in cardiac disorder. SOFA and APACHE II scores are good predictors of morbidity and mortality risk.

Social determinants and exposure to intimate partner violence in women with severe acute maternal morbidity in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Studying severe acute maternal morbidity in the intensive care unit improves our understanding of potential factors affecting maternal health.

AIM

To review evidence on maternal exposure to intimate partner violence and social determinants of health in women with severe acute maternal morbidity in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42016037492). A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, LILACS and SciELO using the search terms "intensive care unit", "intensive care", "critical care" and "critically ill" in combination with "intimate partner violence", "social determinants of health", "severe acute maternal morbidity", pregnancy, postpartum and other similar terms. Eligible studies were (i) quantitative, (ii) published in English and Spanish, (iii) from 2000 to 2021, (iv) with data related to intimate partner violence and/or social determinants of health, and (v) investigating severe acute maternal morbidity (maternity patients treated in the intensive care unit during pregnancy, childbirth or within 42 days of pregnancy termination). Of 52,866 studies initially identified, 1087 full texts were assessed and 156 studies included. Studies were independently assessed by two reviewers for screening, revision, quality assessment and abstracted data. Studies were categorised into high/middle/low-income countries and summarised data were presented using a narrative description, due to heterogenic data as: (i) exposure to intimate partner violence and (ii) social determinants of health.

RESULTS

One study assessed intimate partner violence among mothers with severe acute maternal morbidity in the intensive care unit and found that women exposed to intimate partner violence before and during pregnancy had a nearly four-fold risk of severe acute maternal morbidity requiring ICU admission. Few social determinants of health other than age were reported in most studies.

CONCLUSION

This review identified a significant gap in knowledge concerning intimate partner violence and social determinants of health in women with severe acute maternal morbidity in the intensive care unit, which is essential to better understand the complete picture of the maternal morbidity spectrum and reduce maternal mortality.

Evaluation of critically ill obstetric patients treated in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Although obstetric morbidity and mortality have decreased recently, rates are still high enough to constitute a significant health problem. With the COVID-19 pandemic, many obstetric patients have required treatment in intensive care units (ICU).

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate critical obstetric patients who were treated in an ICU for COVID-19 and followed up for 90 days.

DESIGN

Medical record review SETTING: Intensıve care unit PATİENTS AND METHODS: Obstetric patients admitted to the ICU between 15 March 2020 and 15 March 2022 and followed up for at least 90 days were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with and without COVID-19 were compared by gestational week, indications, comorbidities, length of stay in the hospital and ICU, requirement for mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion, renal replacement therapy (RRT), plasmapheresis, ICU scores, and mortality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical outcomes and mortality.

SAMPLE SIZE AND CHARACTERISTICS

102 patients with a mean (SD) maternal age of 29.1 (6.3) years, and median (IQR) length of gestation of 35.0 (7.8) weeks.

RESULTS

About 30% (n=31) of the patients were positive for COVID-19. Most (87.2%) were cesarean deliveries; 4.9% vaginal (8.7% did not deliver). COVID-19, eclampsia/preeclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage were the most common ICU indications. While the 28-day mortality was 19.3% (n=6) in the COVID-19 group, it was 1.4% (n=1) in the non-COVID-19 group (P<.001). The gestational period was significantly shorter in the COVID-19 group (P=.01) while the duration of stay in ICU (P<.001) and mechanical ventilation (P=.03), lactate (P=.002), blood transfusions (P=.001), plasmapheresis requirements (P=.02), and 28-day mortality were significantly higher (P<.001). APACHE-2 scores (P=.007), duration of stay in ICU (P<.001) and mechanical ventilation (P<.001), RRT (P=.007), and plasmapheresis requirements (P=.005) were significantly higher in patients who died than in those who were discharged.

CONCLUSION

The most common indication for ICU admission was COVID-19. The APACHE-2 scoring was helpful in predicting mortality. We think multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed for COVID-19 obstetric patients. In addition to greater mortality and morbidity, the infection may affect newborn outcomes by causing premature birth.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospectıve, single-center, small population size.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Factors Affecting ICU Stay and Length of Stay in the ICU in Patients with HELLP Syndrome in a Tertiary Referral Hospital

Objective

The study aimed to compare patients with HELLP syndrome who require intensive care and who do not require intensive care and evaluate the factors affecting the length of stay in the intensive care unit.

Methods

Patients were divided into two groups as follows: requiring intensive care (group 1) and not requiring intensive care (group 2). The data of both groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, transfusion amounts, length of stay in the intensive care unit, maternal complications, and mortality.

Results

14032 births in a tertiary center between 2011 and 2018 were evaluated in this study. During the study period, 342 patients were diagnosed with HELLP, and 32 (9.4%) of these were followed up in the intensive care unit. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was determined as 8.1 (7.2) days on average. Fresh frozen plasma, erythrocyte suspension, apheresis, and random thrombocyte transfusion were observed to be significantly more in group 1 patients. In the regression analysis, the most effective factor was found to be erythrocyte suspension and the length of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly longer in patients who had erythrocyte suspension transfusion. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve value for erythrocyte transfusion was 70.6%. When the cutoff value of erythrocyte suspension was 450 (95% CI: 365–681) ml, the sensitivity was 43.8% and the specificity was 91.6%.

Conclusion

We think that physicians should be careful that maternal morbidity and mortality may increase as the need for erythrocyte suspension transfusion increases in patients with HELLP syndrome. Minimum transfusion to hemodynamically stable patients can be more suitable in terms of morbidity and mortality in managing patients with HELLP syndrome requiring erythrocyte suspension transfusion. Precautions and measures should be taken in this regard.

Obstetric anaesthesia as a career

Obstetric anaesthesia is emerging as one of the most demanding subspecialities of anaesthesia. Obstetric anaesthesiologists are now an integral part of the multidisciplinary team managing the high-risk obstetrics. It has been recognised that targeted training in obstetric anaesthesia helps to recognise the mothers who need special care and formulate specific plan for delivery. Among the subspecialties of anaesthesia, obstetric anaesthesia has the potential to get established early. Obstetric anaesthesiologists have the prospect of choosing either a team or an independent practice. Group practice with a multidisciplinary team can mitigate some of the constraints and allows professional fulfilment and enough time for personal, family and societal commitments. Obstetric anaesthesia is a well-paid and sought-after speciality, and a dynamic field that demands excellent clinical and interpretative skills in a rapidly changing environment.

An assessment of baseline risk factors for peripartum maternal critical care interventions

BACKGROUND

Maternal morbidity presents a growing challenge to the American healthcare system and increasing numbers of patients are requiring higher levels of care in pregnancy. Identifying patients at high risk for critical care interventions, including intensive care unit admission, during delivery hospitalizations may facilitate appropriate multidisciplinary planning and lead to improved maternal safety. Baseline risk factors for critical care in pregnancy have not been well-described previously.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses baseline factors associated with critical care interventions that were present at admission for delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational registry of pregnancy after prior uterine surgery and primary cesarean delivery. All women with known gestational age were included. The primary outcome measure was a composite of critical care interventions that included postpartum intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, central intravenous access, and arterial line placement. Risk for this critical care outcome measure was compared by selected baseline and obstetric characteristics known at the time of hospital admission, including maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, race, maternal co-morbidities, parity, and plurality. We evaluated these potential predictors and fit a multivariable logistic regression model to ascertain the most significant risk factors for critical care during a delivery hospitalization.

RESULTS

73,096 of 73,257 women in the parent trial met inclusion criteria, of whom 505 underwent a critical care intervention (0.7%). In the adjusted model, heart disease [aOR = 10.05, CI = 6.97 - 14.49], renal disease [aOR = 2.78, CI = 1.49 - 5.18], and connective tissue disease [aOR = 3.27, CI = 1.52 - 6.99], as well as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.31 - 3.17] were associated with the greatest odds of critical care intervention [p < .01] (Table 2). Other predictors associated with increased risk included maternal age, African American race, smoking, diabetes, asthma, anemia, nulliparity, and twin pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, women with cardiac disease, renal disease, connective tissue disease and preeclampsia spectrum disorders were at increased risk for critical care interventions. Obstetric providers should assess patient risk routinely, ensure appropriate maternal level of care, and create multidisciplinary plans to improve maternal safety and reduce risk.

Characteristics of obstetric admissions to intensive care unit: APACHE II, SOFA and the Glasgow Coma Scale

Objective To evaluate the characteristics of obstetric admissions to an intensive care unit (ICU) and assess the utility of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Methods This study is consisted of 160 patients admitted to an ICU during the antenatal period or within 7 days at the postpartum period. Clinical characteristics and ICU scores were evaluated. Results The rate of admission to the ICU was 7.8/1000 deliveries. Four cases ended with maternal mortality (2.5%). The most common hospitalization indications were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cardiovascular disorders and obstetric hemorrhage, at 40 (25%), 34 (21.2%), and 31 (19.3%) cases, respectively. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for prediction of maternal mortality revealed area under curve (AUC) values as 0.971 both for APACHE II and predicted mortality rate (PMR), and 24.5 and 47.1 were determined as the cut-offs with sensitivities of 100%. AUCs were also 0.901 and 0.929 for the initial and worst SOFA score, respectively. The cut-off value for the initial and worst SOFA score was 3.5, with a sensitivity of 100%, and was 10 with a specificity of 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion APACHE II and PMR overpredict maternal mortality, but those higher scores predict maternal mortality. Higher SOFA scores are related with maternal mortalities with high specificity.

Outcomes of Antepartum and Postpartum Obstetric Admissions to the Intensive Care Unit of A Tertiary University Hospital: An 8-Year Review

Objective

Although their rates are decreasing, pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity are problems worldwide. In this study, we aimed to review the characteristics, diagnoses, required interventions and outcomes of obstetric patients admitted between 2006 and 2014 to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a tertiary university hospital to provide an indicator for improving the management of critically ill obstetric patients.

Methods

A retrospective study of hospital records of obstetric admissions to the ICU was conducted.

Results

The pregnancy-related ICU admission rate was 0.21% among all deliveries during the study period. Nine antepartum (mean gestational age: 23 weeks) and 48 postpartum (mean gestational age: 34 weeks) obstetric ICU admissions were included. Most obstetric patients admitted antepartum were primiparous (88.8%), whereas those admitted postpartum were multiparous (64.6%). The mean ICU stay was 7 days among the patients admitted antepartum and 6 days among those admitted postpartum. Common medical reasons for ICU admission were respiratory failure and HELLP syndrome in both groups; DIC and eclampsia were also medical reasons causing ICU admission among the postpartum patients. Mechanical ventilation and blood derivative transfusion were the most common interventions required during the ICU stay of the obstetric patients. Maternal death was unique to the patients admitted postpartum (6 patients, 12.5%).

Conclusion

We reviewed obstetric admissions to our institution over an 8-year period. We believe that a nationwide study in Turkey that provides an indicator of the frequency, reasons of ICU admission and outcome of obstetric patients is required to improve the quality of intensive care.

Evaluation of Admission Indications, Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Obstetric Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a Teaching Hospital Center: A Five-Year Retrospective Review

Background

Care of obstetric patients has always been a challenge for critical care physicians, because in addition to their complex pregnancy-related disease, fetal viability is considered.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to review the admission indications, clinical characteristics and outcomes of obstetric patients, admitted to the intensive care unit of Alzzahra teaching hospital affiliated to Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant /post-partum (up to 6 weeks) patients admitted to the ICU over a 5-year period from April 2009 to April, 2014.

Results

Data from 1019 subjects were analyzed. Overall, 90.1% of the patients were admitted in the postpartum period. The most common indications for admission were pregnancy related hypertensive disorders (27.5%) and obstetric hemorrhage (13.5%). Epilepsy (5.4%) and cardiac disease (5.2%) were the most common non-obstetric indications.

Conclusions

Pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders and obstetric hemorrhage were the main reasons for admission, and epilepsy and cardiac disease were the most common non-obstetric indications. Efforts must be concentrated on increasing antenatal care.

The Usefulness of the APACHE II Score in Obstetric Critical Care: A Structured Review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) mortality prediction model in pregnant and recently pregnant women receiving critical care in low-, middle-, and high-income countries during the study period (1985-2015), using a structured literature review.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, searched for articles published between 1985 and 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Twenty-five studies (24 publications), of which two were prospective, were included in the analyses. Ten studies were from high-income countries (HICs), and 15 were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Median study duration and size were six years and 124 women, respectively.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ICU admission complicates 0.48% of deliveries, and pregnant and recently pregnant women account for 1.49% of ICU admissions. One quarter were admitted while pregnant, three quarters of these for an obstetric indication and for a median of three days. The median APACHE II score was 10.9, with a median APACHE II-predicted mortality of 16.6%. Observed mortality was 4.6%, and the median standardized mortality ratio was 0.36 (interquartile range 0.23 to 0.73). The standardized mortality ratio was < 0.9 in 24 of 25 studies. Women in HICs were more frequently admitted with a medical comorbidity but were less likely to die than were women in LMICs.

CONCLUSION

The APACHE II score consistently overestimates mortality risks for pregnant and recently pregnant women receiving critical care, whether they reside in HICs or LMICs. There is a need for a pregnancy-specific outcome prediction model for these women.

Use of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for evaluating outcome among obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score among obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted among 90 consecutive obstetric patients who were admitted to the ICU of Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India, between October 6, 2010, and December 25, 2011. Maximum SOFA score was calculated for each of the six organ systems. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine critical cutoff values for total, maximum total, and mean total SOFA scores at various time points.

RESULTS

Total SOFA score at admission displayed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.949, a cutoff value of at least 8.5, sensitivity of 86.7%, and specificity of 90.0%. Maximum total SOFA score had an AUC of 0.980, a cutoff value of at least 10.0, sensitivity of 96.7%, and specificity of 90.0%. Mean total SOFA score had an AUC of 0.997, a cutoff value of at least 9.0, sensitivity of 96.7%, and specificity of 96.7%.

CONCLUSION

In terms of discriminatory power for predicting mortality among obstetric patients admitted to the ICU, total SOFA score at admission was the most relevant, simple, and accurate measure.

Characteristics, Outcomes, and Predictability of Critically Ill Obstetric Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pregnant/postpartum patients requiring ICUs admission in Argentina, describe characteristics of mothers and outcomes for mothers/babies, evaluate risk factors for maternal-fetal-neonatal mortality; and compare outcomes between patients admitted to public and private health sectors.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, national cohort study.

SETTING

Twenty ICUs in Argentina (public, 8 and private, 12).

PATIENTS

Pregnant/postpartum (< 42 d) patients admitted to ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-two patients were recruited, 51% from the public health sector and 49% from the private. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II was 8 (4-12); predicted/observed mortality, 7.6%/3.6%; hospital length of stay, 7 days (5-13 d); and fetal-neonatal losses, 17%. Public versus private health sector patients: years of education, 9 ± 3 versus 15 ± 3; transferred from another hospital, 43% versus 12%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, 9 (5-13.75) versus 7 (4-9); hospital length of stay, 10 days (6-17 d) versus 6 days (4-9 d); prenatal care, 75% versus 99.4%; fetal-neonatal losses, 25% versus 9% (p = 0.000 for all); and mortality, 5.4% versus 1.7% (p = 0.09). Complications in ICU were multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome (34%), shock (28%), renal dysfunction (25%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (20%); all predominated in the public sector. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (during first 24 hr of admission) score of at least 6.5 presented the best discriminative power for maternal mortality. Independent predictors of maternal-fetal-neonatal mortality were Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, education level, prenatal care, and admission to tertiary hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients spent a median of 7 days in hospital; 3.6% died. Maternal-fetal-neonatal mortality was determined not only by acuteness of illness but to social and healthcare aspects like education, prenatal control, and being cared in specialized hospitals. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (during first 24 hr of admission), easier to calculate than Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, was a better predictor of maternal outcome. Evident health disparities existed between patients admitted to public versus private hospitals: the former received less prenatal care, were less educated, were more frequently transferred from other hospitals, were sicker at admission, and developed more complications; maternal and fetal-neonatal mortality were higher. These findings point to the need of redesigning healthcare services to account for these inequities.

Study of Obstetric Admissions to the Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital

PURPOSE

To analyze obstetric admissions to intensive care unit and to identify the risk factors responsible for intensive care admission.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all obstetric cases admitted to the intensive care unit over a period of 3 years. Data were collected from case records. The risk factors responsible for ICU admission were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 765 obstetric admissions to ICU accounting for 1.24 % of all deliveries. 56.20 % were in the age group of 20-25 years. 38.43 % were in their first pregnancy. 36.48 % of cases were at 37-40 weeks of gestation. Postpartum admissions were 80.91 %. Major conditions responsible were obstetric hemorrhage in 44.05 %, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in 28.88 %, severe anemia in 14.37 %, heart disease in 12.15 %, and sepsis in 7.97 % of ICU cases. 40.39 % cases required high dependency care. Maternal mortality was seen in 15.55 % of ICU cases. Commonest cause of mortality was hemorrhagic shock (26.89 %) and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (26.05 %).

CONCLUSION

Commonest risk factors for ICU admissions are obstetric hemorrhage and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Other major risk factors are severe anemia, heart disease, sepsis, more than one diagnosis on admission, and the need for cesarean delivery.

Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: review of three cases and anaesthetic management

Acute pancreatitis is rare in pregnancy, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 1000-3000 pregnancies. Gallstones are the commonest cause. Mortality and morbidity associated with pancreatitis have declined as diagnosis and management options improve. Presentation usually occurs in the third trimester or early postpartum period with severe epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia and fever. Blood investigations show an elevated white cell count and increased liver enzyme concentrations. Ultrasound is safe but has lower sensitivity than computerised tomography for detecting gallstones. Management during pregnancy has traditionally been conservative, followed by cholecystectomy after delivery. Recurrence of pancreatitis during pregnancy may necessitate more urgent surgery. The second trimester is considered the safest for surgery, with early involvement of intensive care as the condition can deteriorate rapidly. We present three cases managed in our unit over a six-month period that illustrate the spectrum of disease and the successful use of a multidisciplinary team approach.

Critical Care of Gynecological and Obstetric Patients: A decade of surgical intensive care experience

Despite the emergence of therapeutic advances, the morbidity and mortality still occur in the obstetric patients, although intensive care utilization by obstetric and gynecological patient, are still rare compared to the general population. Majority of obstetric patients needed the intensive care therapy compared to gynecological patients. The aim of our study was to know the indications for the intensive care admission by obstetric and gynecological patients, length of stay and outcome of these patients.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all obstetric and gynecological patients admitted to our Surgical and Trauma Intensive Care Units (SICU and TICU) from February 1995 to March 2005. Indication for admission, nationality, age, and length of stay in ICU, severity of disease and outcome of these patients were recorded. Data analyzed with SPSS program.

Results: A total of 182 patients were admitted to the SICU of the Hamad Medical Corporation in Doha, Qatar, from the Women's Hospital. 159 (87%) patients were obstetric patients and 23 (13%) patients gynecological patients, 126 (69.6%) patients were admitted post Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). The most common indication for admission was 73 (39.3%) patients obstetric hemorrhage and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC), and then 44 (25.3%) patients of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. The major anesthesia related indication was scoline apnea, 21 (11.6%). Total three obstetric patients died, two due to severe sepsis and multi-organ failure and one due to cerebral sinus thrombosis, giving mortality rate of 1.66%.

Conclusion: Intensive care therapy required by gynecological and obstetric patient is less than the general population. The commonest indication for admission was obstetric hemorrhage, DIC, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The mortality was due to septic shock with multi-organ failure, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

ICU nurses' experiences and perspectives of caring for obstetric patients in intensive care: a qualitative study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of the experiences and perspectives of intensive care nurses caring for critically ill obstetric patients.

BACKGROUND

Current literature suggests critically ill obstetric patients need specialised, technically appropriate care to meet their specific needs with which many intensive care nurses are unfamiliar. Furthermore, there is little research and evidence to guide the care of this distinct patient group.

DESIGN

This study used a descriptive qualitative design.

METHODS

Two focus groups were used to collect data from 10 Australian intensive care units nurses in May 2007. Open-ended questions were used to guide the discussion. Latent content analysis was used to analyse the data set. Each interview lasted no longer than 60 minutes and was recorded using audio tape. The full interviews were transcribed prior to in-depth analysis to identify major themes.

RESULTS

The themes identified from the focus group interviews were competence with knowledge and skills for managing obstetric patients in the intensive care unit, confidence in caring for obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit and acceptance of an expanded scope of practice perceived to include fundamental midwifery knowledge and skills.

CONCLUSION

The expressed lack of confidence and competence in meeting the obstetric and support needs of critically ill obstetric women indicates a clear need for greater assistance and education of intensive care nurses. This in turn may encourage critical care nurses to accept an expanded role of clinical practice in caring for critically ill obstetric patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Recognition of the issues for nurses in successfully caring for obstetric patients admitted to an adult intensive care setting provides direction for designing education packages, ensuring specific carepaths and guidelines are in place and that support from a multidisciplinary team is available including midwifery staff.

Pregnant and postpartum admissions to the intensive care unit: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and characteristics of pregnant and postpartum women requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases (1990-2008) were systematically searched for reports of women admitted to the ICU either pregnant or up to 6 weeks postpartum. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility and abstracted data.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eligible studies reporting outcomes for 7,887 women were analysed. All studies were retrospective with the majority reporting data from a single centre. The incidence of ICU admission ranged from 0.7 to 13.5 per 1,000 deliveries. Pregnant or postpartum women accounted for 0.4-16.0% of ICU admissions in study centres. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were the most prevalent indication for ICU admission [median 0.9 cases per 1,000 deliveries (range 0.2-6.7)]. There was no difference in the profile of ICU admission in developing compared to developed countries, except for the significantly higher maternal mortality rate in developing countries (median 3.3 vs. 14.0%, p = 0.002). Studies reporting patient outcomes subsequent to ICU admission are lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU admission of pregnant and postpartum women occurs infrequently, with obstetric conditions responsible for the majority of ICU admissions. The ICU admission profile of women was similar in developed and developing countries; however, the maternal mortality rate remains higher for ICUs in developing countries, supporting the need for ongoing service delivery improvements. More studies are required to determine the impact of ICU admission for pregnant and postpartum women.

Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit in a tertiary referral hospital

PURPOSE

The present study was conducted to evaluate the obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the setting of a tertiary referral hospital in an attempt to identify the risk factors influencing maternal outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All of the obstetric patients who seeked care for delivery at the emergency department and who were admitted to the ICU between January 2006 to July 2009 were retrospectively identified. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) was calculated and the maternal mortality rate was estimated for each patient. The mean SAPS II scores and the mean estimated maternal mortality rates for the surviving patients and the nonsurviving patients were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-three obstetric patients were admitted to the ICU. There were 9 maternal deaths and 24 fetal deaths. For the surviving group of patients, the mean SAPS II score was 34 and estimated maternal mortality rate was 20%, whereas for the nonsurviving group of patients, the SAPS II score was 64 and estimated maternal mortality rate was 73%. The difference between the surviving group of patients and the nonsurviving group of patients was statistically significant regarding both the mean SAPS II scores and the mean estimated maternal mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders and hemorrhage appear as the major risk factors influencing maternal outcome in obstetric patients. Considering that the use of the SAPS II scores have enabled the reliable estimation of the mortality rates in the present study, the attempts at defining the focus of care for the obstetric patients who bear the major risk factors and who are admitted to the ICU should be carried out under the guidance of the ICU scoring systems such as the SAPS II.

A national survey of obstetric early warning systems in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Despite recommendations in the two most recent Confidential Enquiries into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) reports, and improvements in patient care using early warning scoring systems (EWS) in the general adult population, no validated system currently exists for the obstetric population.

METHODS

We performed an Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association (OAA) approved postal survey of all UK consultant-led obstetric anaesthetic units in November 2007 to assess opinions on the value and of such a system and how it could be implemented, and invited comments and samples of systems already in use.

RESULTS

The response rate was 71%. Of those who replied a median usefulness score of 80% for a standardised national obstetric EWS was demonstrated. Eighty-nine percent of units thought it would be possible to implement a system, and although 96% of UK hospitals already use a non-obstetric EWS, only 23% of respondents thought this to be relevant to obstetric physiology and disease. Nine units returned copies of their obstetric EWS. Using extracts from some of the submitted versions we have designed and implemented a system locally and submitted it to the OAA for consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey results support CEMACH recommendations for a nationally agreed obstetric EWS.

Factors associated with maternal death in women admitted to an intensive care unit with severe maternal morbidity

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with maternal death among women with severe maternal morbidity.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 673 women admitted to an obstetric intensive care unit was undertaken. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for selected characteristics. The maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity ratios were determined for groups of complications according to outcome (death or survival).

RESULTS

The risk of maternal death was higher among adolescents (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1-9.7) and patients referred from other hospitals (OR 9.8; 95% CI, 2.7-53.3). The severe maternal morbidity ratio was 46.6 per 1000 deliveries and the mortality:morbidity ratio 1:37.4. Obstetric complications led to 65.8% of admissions and 50% of maternal deaths. The number of interventions/procedures and total maximum sequential organ failure assessment score were higher in cases of death.

CONCLUSION

The strong association between interhospital transfer and maternal death suggests delays in diagnosis, management, and referral. Adopting organ dysfunction-based criteria may contribute toward identifying the most severe cases.

[Morbidity and mortality of patients with preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome transferred in intensive care]

CONTEXT

During pregnancy, the two leading causes of admission in intensive care are preeclampsia and obstetric haemorrhage. However, there are few studies about preeclamptic patients admitted in intensive care. Our purpose was to determine the outcome of pregnancies with preeclampsia and/or HELLP syndrome admitted in intensive care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study between March 1996 and April 2005 in a level III maternity. 533 patients were managed with preeclampsia and/or HELLP syndrome during this period. We compared patients admitted in intensive care with patients who did not require admission in intensive care.

RESULTS

Sixty six patients (12,4%) with preeclampsia and/or HELLP were admitted in intensive care. Severe HELLP syndrome, eclampsia, neurological troubles and acute pulmonary oedema were the four leading causes of admission. The mean duration of admission was 3, 2+/-2,9 days. Mean age of the patients (28, 2+/-5,8 vs. 29,0+/-5,8 years, NS) and number of primiparous (71, 2% vs 66,6%, NS) were similar between the two groups. The mean gestational age of delivery was reduced when patients were needed admission in intensive care (29,8+/-3,9 weeks of gestation versus 32,5+/-4,4, p<0,001). 77, 3% of babies survived in the intensive care group compared with 90,4% in the other group (p<0,01).

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcome of patients admitted in intensive care for preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome is generally good. However, neonatal morbidity and mortality remained important when women needed management in intensive care.

Obstetric patients in a surgical intensive care unit: prognostic factors and outcome

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, prognostic factors and the outcome of obstetric patients admitted in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) during the ante-partum or postpartum period (within 6 weeks of delivery). Between 1995 and 2002, the patients transferred from the department of obstetrics were retrospectively included into the study. Demographics included: obstetric data, medical and surgical histories, diagnosis, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation system APACHE II score; and the occurrence of organ failure, therapeutic interventions, length of stay in the SICU and outcome were recorded. During the study period, 364 obstetric patients were admitted to the SICU. Obstetric admissions to the SICU represented 0.6% of all deliveries and the SICU utilisation rate was 14.96%. The main indications for admission were eclampsia (70.6%) and postpartum haemorrhage (16.2%). The overall mortality rate was 16.7% (n = 61). In a logistic regression model, risk factors for death included organ system failure (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95 confidence interval (CI) [1.84 - 8.48], bilirubin >12 mg/l (OR = 1.017 CI [1.00 - 1.03]), and prolonged prothrombin time (OR = 0.97 CI [0.95 - 0.99]). Median length of stay was longer in non- survivors (6.5 +/- 7.3 vs 5.5 +/- 4.6 days). Maternal condition on admission and associated complications are the major determinant of maternal outcome.

Obstetric critical care: a blueprint for improved outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric patients are generally young and healthy. However, the potential for catastrophic complications is real, and despite the therapeutic advances of the last few decades, maternal morbidity and mortality continue to occur. This may be related to the pregnancy itself, aggravation of a preexisting illness, or complications of the (operative) delivery.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is two-fold: first, to provide an update on currently available reports pertaining to important critical care issues of the obstetric patient population and, second, to present current comprehensive treatment options for preeclampsia and massive obstetric hemorrhage because both are responsible for the majority of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide.

RESULTS

The most common reasons for intensive care unit admission are hypertensive disorders and massive obstetric hemorrhage. Timely delivery and prompt initiation of antihypertensive therapy for severe hypertension form the mainstay of care in preeclampsia. Restoration of circulating blood volume and rapid control of bleeding and impaired coagulation are the main factors in the management of massive obstetric hemorrhage. Puerperal morbidity has become the main topic of quality of care issues in maternity care. Although the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score is commonly used in the intensive care unit, it does not seem to be appropriate for pregnant women because it overestimates their mortality rates. A high-dependency care unit suits the needs for at least half of the obstetric patient population in need of higher acuity care and will save considerable cost.

CONCLUSION

Emphasis on early detection of maternal problems and prompt referral to tertiary centers with intensive care unit facilities to provide optimum care of the circulation, blood pressure, and respiration at an early stage could minimize the prevalence of multiple organ failure and mortality in critically ill obstetric patients.

Caring for pregnant and postnatal women in intensive care: what do we know?

Critically ill pregnant and postnatal women admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) require highly specialised care, components of which many critical care nurses are unfamiliar with. There are no specialist critical care obstetric centres in Australia, with critically ill obstetric patients admitted to general ICUs. There are no published guidelines and little research that assist critical care nurses to care for such women. Furthermore, the admission of pregnant or postnatal women to ICUs is likely to increase with emerging childbearing patterns in Australia. It is therefore timely to review what we know about caring for critically ill pregnant and postnatal women. This paper analyses the literature on intensive care utilisation by obstetric patients and provides an overview regarding which pregnant and postpartum women require intensive care. The key areas of providing mechanical ventilation to pregnant women and assessment of fetal wellbeing are explored in detail. The most frequent conditions and their treatment, preeclampsia and obstetric haemorrhage, are also reviewed. The establishment of lactation is also considered as the critical carenurse is commonly involved in supporting the woman's endeavour to breastfeed.

Utility of Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III) score in maternal admissions to the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

A mean Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III) score of > 50 is associated with increased intensive care unit mortality rate in nonpregnant cardiac and trauma patients. The objective was to determine the usefulness of the APACHE III score in maternal admissions to an intensive care unit in a tertiary care center in an urban multicultural city.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of all maternal admissions (> 20 weeks of gestation or after delivery) to an intensive care unit between January 2002 and May 2004. Demographics, obstetric and medical history, and 20 physiologic variables that comprise the APACHE III were recorded. The minimum APACHE III score (lowest risk of death) is 0; maximum is 299. The association between APACHE III score and maternal death was assessed with Mann Whitney U test. Significance was assumed at a probability value of < .05.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight subjects met the study criteria. Thirty percent of these women were admitted antepartum (27 +/- 1.0 weeks of gestation); 31% of the women were admitted on the day of delivery; and 29% of the women were admitted after delivery. Mean maternal age was 27 +/- 6.7 years. Acute conditions that resulted in transfer to the intensive care unit included preeclampsia (24%), cardiorespiratory disease (21%), hemorrhage (16%), infection (12%), trauma (7%), and thromboembolism (3%). Fifty-five percent of the women had no previous underlying obstetric complications, and 98% of the women had no underlying chronic health condition. Fifty-eight percent of the women received care in a medical intensive care unit; 28% of the women received care in a surgical intensive care unit; 10% of the women received care in a cardiac intensive care unit, and 3% of the women received care in a neurologic intensive care unit. The mean intensive care unit stay was 3.7 +/- 4.6 days, and the mean hospital stay was 9.0 +/- 7 days. Three patients died; the rest of the patients went home in good condition. The median APACHE III score was 34 (range, 14-102) and was not correlated with maternal death.

CONCLUSION

The APACHE III is not associated with risk of intensive care unit-related maternal death.

Critical illness during pregnancy: considerations for evaluation and treatment of the fetus as the second patient

When a critically ill woman is pregnant, clinical interventions for the mother can have a profound effect on fetal status. It is essential that the fetus be considered as the second patient when developing the plan of care. The most practical solution for providing comprehensive care to pregnant women in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a collaborative approach involving members of the ICU and the perinatal team, each contributing their unique knowledge and skills to the care of the mother and her unborn baby. The purpose of this article is to describe a collaborative approach to caring for a pregnant woman in the ICU along with a brief overview of fetal assessment for ICU care providers so they can become familiar with terms and methods used in assessing fetal status and common interventions that promote fetal well-being.

Critical illness and pregnancy: review of a global problem

Obstetric patients are a small but important group of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Their problems are unique and need specialized attention. Decision making may be confounded by physiologic changes in pregnancy. In developed countries with good antenatal care, comparatively fewer obstetric patients are admitted to ICUs, but the maternal mortality rate remains high in the developing countries. Medical disorders and organ dysfunction caused by critical illness of pregnancy differ from region to region. With improvement in antenatal care, the number of ICU admissions for obstetric disorders would decline in developing countries; however, this number may increase gradually in developed countries because of increasing maternal age and pregnancies in women with complicated chronic medical disorders.