The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section

Comparison of sequential and mixture injections of opioids and hyperbaric bupivacaine for subarachnoid block for lower segment caesarean section: a randomised controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Opioids are commonly added to local anaesthetic for subarachnoid block for caesarean section due to their synergistic effects. The physiochemical characteristics of opioids suggest premixing with hyperbaric bupivacaine may limit their distribution within the CSF. We studied the effect of a separate injection with a combination of bupivacaine, morphine and fentanyl on block characteristics, haemodynamic changes, postoperative pain and patient satisfaction.

METHOD

Following ethical approval and informed consent, a prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial was performed in a university hospital. A total of 126 patients undergoing caesarean section were randomised to two groups. In group M, the premixed group, patients received 12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine, 20 mcg of fentanyl and 100 mcg of morphine injected as a single mixture. In group S, the separate injection group, patients received the same drugs in separate injections. Measurements included haemodynamics, block distribution, intra- and postoperative pain, as well as patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups had similar block height, time to maximum sensory block, time to block regression and motor block. However, haemodynamics were different between the groups. The proportion of systolic hypotension episodes was greater in group S [159/1320 (12.05%)] than group M [113/1452 (7.78%)], with P = 0.0002. Moreover, a greater amount of ephedrine was administered in group S than group M, with values 12.09 (8.1) and 9.09 (8.5) mg respectively (P = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative pain, as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), was greater in group M, with a VAS of 4.6 (1.7), vs. group S, which recorded a VAS of 3.8 (2.0) (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Sequential injection of intrathecal opioids and hyperbaric bupivacaine resulted in greater early haemodynamic instability and slightly better postoperative analgesia without any difference in block height or patient satisfaction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04403724.

Quality of recovery and maternal satisfaction after caesarean delivery: a mixed-methods prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery (QoR) are important patient-reported outcomes and quality metrics. The relationship between these two outcomes is complex, with studies showing a weak correlation between them in the non-obstetric population. We sought to evaluate the correlation between patient satisfaction and QoR scores in the obstetric population after caesarean delivery. As secondary aims, we aimed to determine the influence of urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthetic on patient satisfaction and QoR scores as well as determining drivers of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

METHODS

Women were invited to complete the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSCS) and Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) questionnaires at 24 h after caesarean delivery. Correlations were analysed using Spearman's rank tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 300 women. There was a significant but weak positive correlation between ObsQoR-11 and MSCS scores (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Correlation was significantly influenced by mode of anaesthesia (P < 0.001) and urgency of procedure (P = 0.005), with greater satisfaction amongst patients receiving spinal anaesthesia and those undergoing scheduled caesarean deliveries for a given QoR score. Quality of communication, interactions with staff and aspects of the postpartum physical environment were significant determinants of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Maternal satisfaction and obstetric QoR are distinct entities with a weak correlation between the two variables. Urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthesia are significant predictors of the correlation between satisfaction and quality of recovery scores. Many of the drivers of satisfaction were modifiable including quality of communication and a comfortable physical space for postpartum recovery.

Translation and measurement properties of pregnancy and childbirth questionnaire in Iranian postpartum women

BACKGROUND

Perceived care quality and patient satisfaction have been important care quality indicators in recent decades, and healthcare professionals have been influential on women's childbirth experience. This study investigated the measurement properties of the Persian version of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire (PCQ), designed to measure mothers' satisfaction with the quality of healthcare services provided during pregnancy and childbirth.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional methodological study. Instrument translation, face validity, content validity, structural validity, and reliability evaluation were performed to determine the measurement properties of the PCQ's Persian version. A backward-forward approach was employed for the translation process. Impact scores were selected based on the items' importance to measure face validity. Content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated to measure content validity, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to measure structural validity. The cluster random sampling method was used, resulting in a sample of 250 eligible women referred to the health centers of Tabriz, Iran, who were 4 to 6 weeks after giving birth. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) using a test-retest approach were used to determine the questionnaire's reliability.

RESULTS

The impact scores of all items were above 1.5, which indicates a suitable face validity. The content validity was also favorable (CVR = 0.95, CVI = 0.90). Exploratory factor analysis on 25 items led to the removal of item 2 due to a factor loading of less than 0.3 and the extraction of three factors explaining 65.07% of the variances. The results of the sample adequacy size were significant (< 0.001, and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.886). The model's validity was confirmed based on the confirmatory factor analysis fit indicators (i.e., RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.09, TLI = 0.91, CFI = 0.93, x2/df = 4.65). The tool's reliability was also confirmed (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88, and ICC (95% CI) = 0.93 (0.88 to 0.95)).

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of the PCQ's Persian version were suitable to measure the extent to which Iranian women are satisfied with the quality of prenatal and intrapartum care.

Informational video on preoperative anxiety and postoperative satisfaction prior to elective cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anxiety affects 60 to 80% of patients who are candidates for surgery. Reducing preoperative anxiety can improve surgical outcomes, shorten hospital stays, and minimize disruptions in lifestyle. Having information affects people ability to identify important points and improve their understanding, and lack of information causes fear and anxiety, which negatively affects decision-making. Studies have shown that the intervention of education before cesarean section has a beneficial effect on women anxiety level. Providing information before surgery can reduce patients' anxiety. This study was conducted to determine the effect of information video before elective cesarean delivery on preoperative anxiety and post-operative satisfaction.

METHODS

The search for relevant studies was systematically conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SID (Persian database), and Google Scholar (search engine) until July 4, 2023, in both English and Persian languages. The revised tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials (RoB 2.0) and ROBIN-I were used to evaluate the risk of bias, and heterogeneity was assessed using I². In cases of high heterogeneity, a random effects model was used instead of a fixed effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the duration of the video, and the type of intervention for the primary outcome. Sensitivity analysis was conducted based on the type of study. A random-effects meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify potential sources of high heterogeneity for preoperative anxiety. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

A total number of 557 articles were found in databases. Three hundred sixty-eight studies were screened based on their titles, abstracts, and full texts. Of these, 16 studies were assessed for eligibility, and 7 were excluded. Ultimately, nine papers were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the information video before elective cesarean delivery compared to control group may have little or no effect on preoperative anxiety, but the evidence is uncertain (SMD - 0.22, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.06, 9 trials, 1020 participants, I2 = 80%; very low-certainty evidence). Also, it probably increases the post-operative satisfaction (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.42, 5 trials, 618 participants, I2 = 0%; Moderate-certainty evidence). The random effect meta-regression analyses indicated a significant correlation between the mean age of the intervention group (β = 0.137, P < 0.001) and the mean age of the control group (β = 0.150, P = 0.0246) with effect size.

CONCLUSION

This study found that watching an informational video prior to elective cesarean delivery resulted in a decrease in preoperative anxiety. However, it is important to note that the reduction was not statistically significant, and there was a high level of inconsistency among the results. Nonetheless, the intervention did lead to an improvement in women's post-operative satisfaction. To determine the optimal time duration and content type of informational videos, further studies with more appropriate methodology are necessary.

A randomized controlled trial of rectal versus intramuscular diclofenac for post-operative analgesia after open myomectomy

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of rectal versus intramuscularly administered Diclofenac in reducing post-operative pain in the first 24 h after open-myomectomy.

METHODS

A single blind, placebo controlled randomized trial consisting of 90 consenting women that had open-abdominal-myomectomy. They were randomized into two-groups (rectal-group and intramuscular-group) of 45 women (1:1 ratio). Rectal-group received 75 mg of Diclofenac suppository 12 hourly for 24 h and placebo (3 ml of intramuscular injection-water) 12hourly for 24 h while intramuscular-group received intramuscular Diclofenac 75 mg 12 hourly for 24 h and placebo (Anusol suppository) 12 hourly for 24 h. Both groups received intramuscular Pentazocine 30 mg 6 hourly for 24 h as primary analgesic after myomectomy. Pain was assessed using a Ten-Point Visual-Analogue-Scale. Participants' satisfaction of the mode of the pain relief was assessed using the Likert-scale after 24 h. The primary outcome was the pain score using the visual-analogue-scale. The secondary outcome-measures were participants' satisfaction after 24 h of administration of the drugs, the need and frequency of rescue-analgesia and maternal-side-effects.

RESULT

The baseline socio-demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in pain assessment at 1 h post-myomectomy (p-value > 0.05). However, the pain assessments at 6, 12, 18 and 24 h post-myomectomy were statistically significant with more pain in intramuscular-group when compared to rectal-group. Majority of participants in rectal-group were both very satisfied (35.6 %) and satisfied (55.6 %) when compared to intramuscular-group (11.1 %) and (31,1%) respectively (p-value < 0.05). Also majority of the participants in intramuscular-group were dissatisfied (17.8 %) with none of the participant showing any form of dissatisfaction (p-value < 0.05). Majority of the participant in rectal-group had no drug side effects when compared with intramuscular-group. Epigastric discomfort was commoner in rectal-group while drowsiness was commoner in intramuscular-group.

CONCLUSION

Rectal Diclofenac with intramuscular Pentazocine is significantly associated with better effectiveness in pain reduction and maternal satisfaction when compared with intramuscular Diclofenac and intramuscular Pentazocine following open-myomectomy. While epigastric discomfort was the commonest side-effect in rectal-group, drowsiness was commoner in intramuscular-group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Pan-African-clinical-trial-registry (PACTR); PACTR202206556144219.

The Effect of a Simple Perioperative Video on Maternal Anxiety and Satisfaction Before Regional Anesthesia in a Caribbean Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Anxiety before regional anesthesia and surgery is common among women undergoing cesarean section. Although perioperative education has been shown to reduce this level of anxiety, the optimal form and timing of this intervention are not known. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an educational anesthetic video on reducing anxiety and improving maternal satisfaction in patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia.

METHODS

Eighty patients scheduled for cesarean section at a tertiary-level obstetric center were randomized to either an interventional group (viewed an educational video on the evening before surgery) or the control group (no educational video). Both groups received a standard preoperative assessment on the morning of surgery. Anxiety was assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the visual analog scale for anxiety (VAS-A). Maternal satisfaction was assessed using the Maternal Satisfaction Scale Score for Cesarean Section (MSSSCS). Anxiety was assessed at baseline (the evening before surgery) and immediately before surgery. Maternal satisfaction was assessed on the first postoperative day. Patients in the intervention group also had their state anxiety measured immediately after viewing the educational anesthetic video using the VAS-A.

RESULTS

Both groups were equally matched at baseline, and a statistically significant reduction in anxiety measured using VAS-A was seen in the intervention group vs. the control group (6 vs. 4.6, p = 0.018). State-trait anxiety measured using STAI, however, was not significantly lower in the intervention vs. control group (44 vs. 46, p = 0.99). VAS-A immediately after looking at the video was also not significantly different (5 vs. 4, p = 0.323) from the control group. Maternal satisfaction was also higher in the intervention group (113 vs. 104.5, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

The use of a simple educational anesthetic video may be associated with reduced anxiety and improved maternal satisfaction in patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia.

Overcoming Language Barriers Using an Information Video on Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Implementation and Impact on Maternal Anxiety

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether the implementation of an information video on spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, narrated in a patient's first language, reduces anxiety, increases satisfaction, and improves doctor-patient communication if there is a language barrier. In South Africa, most doctors speak English, and patients speak Xhosa, with educational and cultural disparities existing in many doctor-patient interactions.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-five Xhosa patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were enrolled in the study. The first 92 patients received "usual care" verbal explanations of the spinal anesthesia procedure (control group); the next 83 patients watched a spinal anesthesia information video (intervention group), narrated in Xhosa. Videos were displayed using smartphones. Maternal anxiety was assessed before and after spinal explanation, using a Numerical Visual Analog Anxiety Scale (NVAAS). A difference in postexplanation NVAAS score of 1.5 points between intervention and control groups was regarded as clinically significant. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Cesarean Section (MSSCS).

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age (31.5 years [5.2 years] and 32.1 years [5.4 years]) and preexplanation NVAAS score (4.2 [3.2] and 4.0 [3.0]) of the intervention and control groups, respectively, showed no difference at baseline. The mean (SD) postexplanation decrease in NVAAS score was greater in the intervention than in the control group (1.6 [3.5] vs 0.7 [2.3]; P = .046; unadjusted mean difference, 0.9 points [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.02-1.8]). A linear regression model for the postexplanation NVAAS score showed that the intervention effect was significantly associated with the preexplanation score (P = .002), adjusted for age and English fluency. Patients with preexplanation NVAAS scores ≥5 showed a statistically significant intervention effect. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the intervention and control groups. The smartphone was an accessible and convenient display medium for the video. Ninety-nine percent of patients exposed to the intervention would recommend watching the video before the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, lower NVAAS scores were observed in anxious patients, when a Xhosa information video was used to ameliorate challenges posed by a doctor-patient language barrier. It is easily implemented and demonstrates a novel use of mobile health technology. The study provides baseline data to inform sample size calculations for future studies. A high level of patient recommendation for the video suggests that this is an agreeable practice.

A randomized double-blind comparison of the double-space technique versus the single-space technique in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section

BACKGROUND

Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) can be performed with either a single-space technique or a double-space technique for cesarean section. We performed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on sensory block level and side effects.

METHODS

Parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 20) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 20). In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1-2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace. In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique.

RESULTS

There were no differences in time to readiness or intraoperative level of sensory block between the two groups. The postoperative sensory level was maintained at a higher level in the double group than in the single group (1 h postoperatively, P = 0.029; 6 h postoperatively, P = 0.016). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. The parturient satisfaction scores 48 h postoperatively were significantly different between groups (9.5 in the double group vs. 8 in the single group, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there were no differences in intraoperative variables between the double-space technique and the single-space technique for CSEA. However, double-space CSEA for cesarean section may be beneficial for controlling postoperative pain and improving parturient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered at https://cris.nih.go.kr under the trial ID KCT0002514. Date of registration: October 27, 2017.

Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0

BACKGROUND

Assessing women's childbirth experiences is a crucial indicator in maternity services because negative childbirth experiences are associated with maternal mortalities and morbidities. Due to the high caesarean birth rate in Iran, measuring childbirth experience is a top priority, however, there is no standard tool to measure this key indicator in Iran. The aim of present study is to adapt the "Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0" to the Iranian context and determine its psychometric characteristics.

METHODS

Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 was translated into Farsi. A total of 500 primiparous women, at 4 to 16 weeks postpartum, were randomly selected from 54 healthcare centres in Tabriz. Internal consistency and reliability was calculated using the Cronbach's Coefficient alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, respectively. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and discriminant validity using the known-group method and the Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

The internal consistency and reliability for the total tool were high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.97). Explanatory factor analysis demonstrated the adequacy of the sampling (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.923) and significant factorable sphericity (p < 0.001). Confirmation factor analysis demonstrated acceptable values of fitness (RMSEA = 0.07, SRMSEA = 0.06, TLI = 0.97, CFI > 0.91, x 2/ df = 4.23). Discriminatory validity of the tool was confirmed where the CEQ score and its subdomains were significantly higher in women who reported having control over their childbirth than women who did not.

CONCLUSION

The Farsi version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 tool is a valid and reliable tool and can be used to measure the childbirth experience in Iranian women.

Effects of Skin-to-Skin Care During Cesareans: A Quasiexperimental Feasibility/Pilot Study

Introduction: Our aim was to describe feasibility and outcomes of skin-to-skin care (SSC) that began during cesarean surgery and continued, uninterrupted, for about 5 hours. We described maternal/newborn measures of physiologic stability and stress; maternal measures of comfort; maternal satisfaction with surgery and SSC; and exclusive breast milk feeding at discharge. Materials and Methods: We used a quasiexperimental, time-interrupted design and randomly assigned women to receive SSC that began during surgery (Group 1, intervention; n = 20) or after surgery, before transfer to recovery (Group 2, standard care; n = 20). We analyzed differences across time and for five observations: before transfer to the operating room (OR); in the OR, about 20 minutes after birth; in the recovery room, about 1 hour after admission; in the New Family Center (NFC), about 1 hour after admission; and in the NFC, about 2 hours after admission. Results: Group 1 began SSC an average of 0.89 minutes after birth and continued an average of 300 minutes and Group 2 began an average of 46 minutes after birth and continued an average of 126 minutes. Women who began SSC during surgery were more satisfied with the experience (p = 0.015) and had lower levels of salivary cortisol across time (p = 0.003). We found no negative effects on maternal or newborn measures of physiologic stability and no difference in exclusive breast milk feeding rates at discharge. Conclusion: Immediate and uninterrupted SSC during medically uncomplicated cesarean surgery is a feasible, low-cost intervention that can safely begin during surgery and continue, uninterrupted, for extended durations.

The effect of patient-selected or preselected music on anxiety during cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

Background: Women undergoing cesarean delivery may have significant anxiety prior to surgery. Nonpharmacological approaches to anxiety reduction are favored in this patient population.Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of patient-selected or preselected music on anxiety in parturients undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery.Materials and methods: This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial (IRB protocol #2015P002043; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02732964), of 150 parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Parturients were randomized to patient-selected music (Pandora^®), preselected music (Mozart), or no music (control). The primary outcome was anxiety after music exposure (versus no music) in the preoperative holding room. Secondary outcomes included postoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction.Results: Baseline anxiety and anxiety following preoperative exposure did not differ in the Pandora versus control group (3.8 ± 2.4 versus 4.6 ± 2.6, mean difference -0.8 [95% CI -1.8 to 0.2], p = .12), but was lower in the Mozart group versus control group (3.5 ± 2.5 versus 4.6 ± 2.5, mean difference -1.1 [95% CI -2.2 to -0.1], p = .03). Postoperative anxiety did not differ in the Pandora versus control group (1.0 ± 1.4 versus 1.3 ± 2.0, mean difference -0.3 [95% CI -1.0 to 0.4], p = .43), or in the Mozart versus control group (0.8 ± 1.3 versus 1.3 ± 2.0, mean difference -0.5 [95% CI -1.2 to 0.2], p = .15). Postoperative pain was not different in the Pandora group versus control group (0.8 ± 1.5 versus 1.4 ± 1.9, mean difference -0.6 [95% CI -1.3 to 0.1], p = .10), but was lower in the Mozart versus control group (0.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.4 ± 1.9, mean difference -0.8 [95% CI -1.4 to -0.1], p = .03). Total patient satisfaction scores were not different among the control, Pandora, and Mozart groups.Conclusion: While preselected Mozart music results in lower anxiety prior to cesarean delivery, patient-selected Pandora music does not. Further investigation to determine how music affects patients, clinicians, and the operating room environment during cesarean delivery is warranted.Clinical trial registration: NCT02732964.

Large dose bupivacaine 0.5% versus small dose in elective cesarean section

Background and Aim:

The spinal anesthesia in a cesarean section is still presenting a challenge to the anesthetist in the form of either severe hypotension from large bupivacaine dose or insufficient satisfactory anesthesia level conditions as a result of small bupivacaine dose. In this study, we tried to solve this challenge by increasing the dose of bupivacaine to achieve a proper spinal level accompanied by prolonged sitting up to avoid hypotension.

Patients and Methods:

We included 53 patients in this study whom were randomly divided into two groups, namely Group B and Group C. In Group B (25 patients), each patient received 3 mL of bupivacaine and left 5 min sitting up, whereas in Group C (28 patients), each patient received 2.5 mL of bupivacaine and was asked to lie supine immediately. Both groups were tested for hypotension, ephedrine dose, and sensory block level.

Results:

The present study showed a statistically significant lower dose of ephedrine which was given in Group B (7.2 ± 15.684 mg in Group B versus 27.86 ± 12.04 mg in Group C with P < 0.05). The proper anesthesia level was achieved equally in both groups.

Conclusions:

Large dose 15 mg of bupivacaine with the prolonged sitting position will lead to fewer incidences of hypotension and proper anesthesia block.

Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments

BACKGROUND

Women's childbirth experience can have immediate as well as long-term positive or negative effects on their life, well-being and health. When evaluating and drawing conclusions from research results, women's experiences of childbirth should be one aspect to consider. Researchers and clinicians need help in finding and selecting the most suitable instrument for their purpose. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically identify and present validated instruments measuring women's childbirth experience.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in January 2016 with a comprehensive search in the bibliographic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Included instruments measured women's childbirth experiences. Papers were assessed independently by two reviewers for inclusion, and quality assessment of included instruments was made by two reviewers independently and in pairs using Terwee et al's criteria for evaluation of psychometric properties.

RESULTS

In total 5189 citations were screened, of which 5106 were excluded by title and abstract. Eighty-three full-text papers were reviewed, and 37 papers were excluded, resulting in 46 included papers representing 36 instruments. These instruments demonstrated a wide range in purpose and content as well as in the quality of psychometric properties.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an overview of existing instruments measuring women's childbirth experiences and can support researchers to identify appropriate instruments to be used, and maybe adapted, in their specific contexts and research purpose.

Premedication with midazolam prior to cesarean delivery in preeclamptic parturients: A randomized controlled trial

Background:

Anxiety is a concern in obstetrics, especially in preeclamptic mothers. Sedation is not commonly used in parturients for fear of adverse neonatal effect. We investigated maternal and neonatal outcome of midazolam as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.

Methods:

A prospective randomized controlled trial, in which eighty preeclamptic parturients received either an intravenous dose of 0.035 mg/kg of midazolam or an equal volume of normal saline, 30 min before spinal anesthesia. Maternal anxiety was assessed using Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS); postoperative maternal satisfaction was assessed using Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Cesarean Section (MSSCS). Newborns were assessed using Apgar score, Neonatal Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score (NACS), and umbilical artery blood gases.

Results:

Mothers premedicated with midazolam showed a lower level of preoperative anxiety and a higher degree of postoperative satisfaction than the control group. There were no between-group differences regarding the neonatal outcome.

Conclusion:

Preeclamptic parturients premedicated with midazolam (0.035 mg/kg) before spinal anesthesia have lower anxiety and higher postoperative satisfaction levels, with no adverse effects on the newborns.

Patient-Satisfaction Measures in Anesthesia

Patient satisfaction is an important measure of the quality of health care and is used as an outcome measure in interventional and quality improvement studies. Previous studies have found that there are few appropriately developed and validated questionnaires available. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify all tools used to measure patient satisfaction with anesthesia, which have undergone a psychometric development and validation process, appraised the quality of these processes, and made recommendations of tools that may be suitable for use in different clinical and academic settings. There are a number of robustly developed and subsequently validated instruments, however, there are still many studies using nonvalidated instruments or poorly developed tools, claiming to accurately assess satisfaction with anesthesia. This can lead to biased and inaccurate results. Researchers in this field should be encouraged to use available validated tools, to ensure that patient satisfaction is measured and reported fairly and accurately.

Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review

Background

Satisfaction is the one of the most frequently reported outcome measures for quality of care. Assessment of satisfaction with maternity services is crucial, and psychometrically sound measures are needed if this is to inform health practices. This paper comparatively reviews current measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth.

Methods

A review of the literature was conducted. Studies were located through computerised databases and hand searching references of identified articles and reviews. Inclusion criteria were that the questionnaire was a multi-item scale of satisfaction with care during labour and birth, and some form of psychometric information (either information about questionnaire construction, or reliability, or validity) had to be reported.

Results

Nine questionnaires of satisfaction with care during labour and birth were identified. Instruments varied in psychometric properties and dimensions. Most described questionnaire construction and tested some form of reliability and validity. Measures were generally not based on the main theoretical models of satisfaction and varied in scope and application to different types of samples (e.g. satisfaction following caesarean section). For an in-depth measure of satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Intrapartal-Specific Quality from the Patient’s Perspective questionnaire (QPP-I) is recommended. Brief measures with good reliability and validity are provided by the Six Simple Questions (SSQ) or Perceptions of Care Adjective Checklist (PCACL-R).

Conclusions

Despite the interest in measures of satisfaction there are only a small number of validated measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth. It is important that brief, reliable and valid measures are available for use in general and specific populations in order to assist research and inform practice.

Study of equivalence: spinal bupivacaine 15 mg versus bupivacaine 12 mg with fentanyl 15 μg for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

A safe and effective intrathecal dose of bupivacaine alone for cesarean delivery has not yet been established. This study tested the hypothesis that an intrathecal dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg would produce equivalent spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery as the combination of hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg and fentanyl 15 μg.

METHODS

This was a single center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of equivalence. One hundred and thirty-eight healthy parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomized to receive either intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (Group B) or hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg with fentanyl 15 μg (Group BF). Parturients where asked to describe their degree of sensation during surgery using a four-point scale 20 min after spinal injection. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of maternal side effects, maternal hemodynamics and the need for supplemental analgesia.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the quality of anesthesia between the two groups. Sixty-eight of 69 and 69/69 patients in Group B and Group BF, respectively had anesthesia classified as successful (RR=1.01; 95% CI 0.85, 1.22). The only two secondary outcomes that were different between the groups were the largest change in mean arterial pressure (decrease of 40 mmHg and 34 mmHg for Group B and Group BF, respectively; P=0.004) and the incidence of nausea (59% and 35% for Group B and Group BF, respectively; P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the degree of sensation at 20 min between Group B and Group BF. The only significant differences between the two techniques were a higher incidence of nausea and decrease in maternal blood pressure in Group B.

Preoperative anxiety and postoperative satisfaction in women undergoing elective caesarean section

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to investigate whether preoperative anxiety in women undergoing elective caesarean section predicts postoperative maternal satisfaction with the process, perceptions of recovery, analgesic use or length of hospital stay. Other factors that might influence postoperative satisfaction were also explored.

METHOD

In 85 women awaiting elective caesarean section, anxiety, social support and aspects of preparation were measured in the 24 hours preceding surgery. Maternal satisfaction and perceptions of recovery were assessed around the third postoperative day. Satisfaction with the preoperative information from the anaesthetist and postoperative pain relief were also measured at this time. Medical notes were used to gather information on analgesia use and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Preoperative anxiety scores were comparable with those of general surgical/medical patients. Preoperative trait anxiety and state anxiety were inversely associated with postoperative maternal satisfaction. State anxiety was also inversely associated with better recovery. Preoperative anxiety was not associated with analgesic use or length of hospital stay. Linear regression analysis indicated the degree of satisfaction with information from the anaesthetist and perceived emotional support from the partner explained 52% of the variance in postoperative maternal satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Lower preoperative anxiety is associated with greater maternal satisfaction with elective caesarean section and better recovery. Information provided by anaesthetists and perceived emotional support are also of importance. It may be possible to identify women with high anxiety and facilitate satisfaction and recovery through providing additional supportive input.

The effects of a functional knee brace during early treatment of patients with a nonoperated acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a functional knee brace on nonoperated acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient patients.

DESIGN

: Prospective randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University clinic.

PATIENTS

Ninety-five patients (18-50 years old) with an acute ACL tear were included in the present study. The subjects were randomized to either brace group, treated with functional bracing from the first testing session (<5 weeks postinjury) to 12 weeks postinjury or a control group, treated without bracing. The patients were followed for 6 months. Twenty-one subjects were excluded due to the following exclusion criteria: partial rupture or articular cartilage injury shown on MRI or with arthroscopy, or other injuries that negatively affected rehabilitation, or dropped out due to surgery (n = 22), or personal reasons (n = 10). Forty-two patients remained in the study, 22 in the brace group and 20 in the control group.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Visual analogue scale, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Cincinnati knee score, a brace evaluation form, and muscle peak torque.

RESULTS

When using the brace the subjects in the brace group experienced less (P = 0.047) sense of instability, evaluated with visual analogue scale, than the control group. However, bracing had no effect on any of the variables in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Cincinnati knee score and no effect on quadriceps or hamstring muscle peak torque. Subjectively, the brace group experienced a positive effect of the brace on rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperated acute ACL-deficient patients experienced a positive effect of the brace regarding sense of instability and rehabilitation. However, these findings were not supported by objective outcomes.

A prospective observational study of the subjective experience of caesarean section under regional anaesthesia

The aim of our study was to determine the subjective sensation of caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. We performed a prospective, observational study of 205 patients undergoing caesarean section under regional anaesthesia in a UK district general hospital. Patients were asked open and closed questions relating to their physical and emotional experience during the operation. Seventy-three percent of patients chose the phrase "pulling and pushing" to describe the physical sensation of the operation, 75% described the experience as pleasant, and only 4% described it as unpleasant, the rest saying it was neither pleasant nor unpleasant. Ninety-six percent said they would by choice have any future caesarean section under regional anaesthesia, 3% were undecided and 1% said they would prefer a general anaesthetic next time. This study provides important precise information that may be given to patients before caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. We believe it will help minimise preoperative fears and increase patients' ability to make informed decisions about their care.

Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction represents an essential part of quality management. Measuring the degree of patient satisfaction can be achieved with a variety of tools such as postoperative visits and patient questionnaires. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the degree of patient satisfaction with anaesthesia. A secondary aim was to compare the questionnaire technique with standardised face-to-face interviewing.

METHODS

The authors prospectively studied 700 patients on the second postoperative day. Patients were randomised and allocated to complete either a written questionnaire or to answer the same questions during a standardised face-to-face interview. The questionnaire was subdivided into a set of questions on anaesthesia-related discomfort and another set on satisfaction with anaesthesia care in general. The questions on discomfort were assessed on a 3-point scale, and those on patient satisfaction on a 4-point scale.

RESULTS

Response rate was 84% (589 of 700 patients). Internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.84. When evaluating the questions on anaesthesia-related discomfort, the most frequent sensations were "drowsiness" (>75%), "pain at the surgical site" (>55%), and "thirst" (>50%). The data on patient satisfaction showed a high degree of satisfaction (>90%). The responses to questions on anaesthesia-related discomfort revealed only minor differences between the questionnaire and the face-to-face interview. The questions on satisfaction with anaesthesia, however, were answered consistently in a more critical manner during the interview (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The standardised interview may be more suited to determine patient satisfaction than a questionnaire. Quality improvements are possible for emergence from anaesthesia, postoperative pain therapy, and the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section

PURPOSE

Epidural anesthesia was a commonly used technique for elective Cesarean section. Recently, because of the availability of non-cutting spinal needles, many institutions have changed from epidural to spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section with a new satisfaction tool.

METHODS

We studied healthy parturients in a randomized, double-blinded pilot study in which patients were assigned to receive either epidural (n = 13) or spinal (n = 14) anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Two and 24 hr postoperatively, patients completed a validated 22-point maternal satisfaction questionnaire and a 10-cm visual analog score (VAS) for satisfaction. Maternal satisfaction scores were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in demographics, complications or technical failures between groups. Mean satisfaction scores on the questionnaire (0-154) at two and 24 hr were 130.23 +/- 11.36 and 129.54 +/- 16.70 for the epidural group and 116.92 +/- 18.47 and 115.92 +/- 15.71 for the spinal group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03 respectively). No difference in VAS scores was noted. The presence of minor side effects including pruritus contributed to the lower satisfaction in the spinal group at 24 hr.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated higher maternal satisfaction with epidural than with spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. This may be related to the increased side effects caused by neuraxial morphine. The satisfaction questionnaire was able to elucidate differences not detected with a global VAS for satisfaction. Further study with a larger patient population is required to confirm these data.