Compliance with follow-up and prognosis among patients with thin melanomas

Association between dermatology follow-up and melanoma survival: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that patients with melanoma undergo dermatologic examination at least annually. Adherence to follow-up and its impact on survival are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the level of adherence to annual dermatologic follow-up in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma, identify predictors for better adherence, and evaluate whether adherence was associated with melanoma-related mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective inception cohort analysis of adults with primary invasive melanoma in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2013 with follow-up until December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

Adherence to dermatologic follow-up was variable with only 28.0% of patients seeing a dermatologist at least annually (median follow-up 5.0 years). Younger age, female sex, higher income, greater access to dermatology care, stage 2/3 melanoma, prior keratinocyte carcinoma, fewer comorbidities, and any outpatient visit in the 12 months prior to melanoma diagnosis were predictors for adherence. Greater adherence to annual dermatology visits was associated with reduced melanoma-specific mortality compared with lower levels of adherence (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78).

LIMITATIONS

Observational study design and inability to identify skin examinations performed by non-dermatologists.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to annual dermatology visits after melanoma diagnosis was low. Greater adherence may promote better patient survival but warrants confirmation in further research including randomized trials.

Adherence with surveillance schedule in patients with invasive melanoma

BACKGROUND

Seven percent of patients develop melanoma recurrence after successful treatment, and 4-8% develop a second primary melanoma. This study aimed to assess how providing Survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) to patients may improve adherence to surveillance visits.

METHODS

All patients treated for invasive melanoma at our institution between 8/1/2018-2/29/2020 were included in this retrospective chart review. SCPs were delivered in-person to patients and sent to primary care providers and dermatologists. Logistic regression was performed to assess influences on adherence.

RESULTS

Of 142 patients, 73 (51.4%) received SCP regarding their follow-up care. Reception of SCP (p = 0.044) and shorter distance from clinic (p = 0.018) significantly improved rates of adherence. Seven patients developed melanoma recurrences, five were physician-detected. Three patients had primary site recurrence, six had lymph node recurrences, and three had distant recurrences. There were 5 second primaries, all physician-detected.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first to investigate the impact of SCPs on patient adherence in melanoma survivors and the first to reveal a positive correlation between SCPs and adherence in any type of cancer. Melanoma survivors require close clinical follow-up, as demonstrated by our study finding that even with SCPs, most recurrences and all new primary melanomas were physician-detected.

Assessing the Educational and Supportive Care Needs of Canadian Metastatic Melanoma Patients and Survivors Attending an Outpatient Clinic

The rapid development of metastatic melanoma treatment options has significantly improved overall survival, but paralleled patient educational and supportive care resources have fallen behind. Particularly, the need for grassroots programs targeting environments outside urban centers has grown. Accordingly, an environmental scan of the Durham region in Ontario, Canada, showed the lack of melanoma-specific resources for outpatients. The goal of this study was to identify the needs of metastatic melanoma patients and survivors attending a large outpatient clinic in Durham, and then develop a patient-reviewed intervention plan. Needs were assessed in 5 domains through a melanoma-specific supportive care needs assessment survey. Among 75 surveyed melanoma patients and survivors, high-level needs were identified in 3 domains: psychological, health system information, and melanoma-specific information. Furthermore, domain-specific needs were heightened in specific sociodemographic groups. Based on these survey results, a multifaceted intervention plan was developed to mitigate future needs. The intervention plan was patient-reviewed in focus groups prior to implementation, refining the developed intervention plan.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Psycho-Educational Intervention Targeting Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People Treated for Early-Stage Melanoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a newly developed psycho-educational intervention to reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in early-stage melanoma patients.

METHODS

A within-trial cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis was conducted from the Australian health system perspective using data from linked Medicare records. Outcomes included FCR, measured with the severity subscale of the FCR Inventory; quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) measured using the preference-based instrument, Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) and 12-month survival. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for two economic outcomes: (1) cost per additional case of 'high' FCR avoided and (2) cost per QALY gained. Means and 95% CIs around the ICER were generated from non-parametric bootstrapping with 1000 replications.

RESULTS

A total of 151 trial participants were included in the economic evaluation. The mean cost of the psycho-educational intervention was AU$1614 per participant, including intervention development costs. The ICER per case of high FCR avoided was AU$12,903. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve demonstrated a 78% probability of the intervention being cost effective relative to the control at a threshold of AU$50,000 per extra person avoiding FCR. The ICER per QALY gained was AU$116,126 and the probability of the intervention being cost effective for this outcome was 36% at a willingness to pay of AU$50,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSION

The psycho-educational intervention reduced FCR at 12 months for people at high risk of developing another melanoma and may represent good value for money. For the QALY outcome, the psycho-educational intervention is unlikely to be cost effective at standard government willingness-to-pay levels. The trial was prospectively registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (CTRN12613000304730).

Process Mining and Conformance Checking of Long Running Processes in the Context of Melanoma Surveillance

BACKGROUND

Process mining is a relatively new discipline that helps to discover and analyze actual process executions based on log data. In this paper we apply conformance checking techniques to the process of surveillance of melanoma patients. This process consists of recurring events with time constraints between the events.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this work is to show how existing clinical data collected during melanoma surveillance can be prepared and pre-processed to be reused for process mining.

METHODS

We describe an approach based on time boxing to create process models from medical guidelines and the corresponding event logs from clinical data of patient visits.

RESULTS

Event logs were extracted for 1023 patients starting melanoma surveillance at the Department of Dermatology at the Medical University of Vienna between January 2010 and June 2017. Conformance checking techniques available in the ProM framework and explorative applied process mining techniques were applied.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented time boxing enables the direct use of existing process mining frameworks like ProM to perform process-oriented analysis also with respect to time constraints between events.

Psychoeducational Intervention to Reduce Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People at High Risk of Developing Another Primary Melanoma: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

People with a history of melanoma commonly report a fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), yet psychologic support is not routinely offered as part of ongoing melanoma care. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention to reduce FCR and improve psychologic adjustment in this patient group compared with usual care.

Methods

The intervention comprised a newly developed psychoeducational resource and three telephone-based psychotherapeutic sessions over a 1-month period timed in accordance with dermatologic appointments. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 80) or usual care (n = 84). Assessments were completed at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after dermatologic appointments. Linear mixed models were used to examine differences between treatment and control groups for patient-reported outcomes, including FCR, anxiety, stress, depression, melanoma-related knowledge, health behaviors, satisfaction with melanoma care, unmet needs, and health-related quality of life.

Results

At 6 months, the intervention group reported lower FCR severity, trigger, and distress scores than the control group in the baseline-adjusted models; the between-group mean difference was −1.9 for FCR severity (95% CI, −3.1 to −0.7; P = .002), −2.0 for FCR triggers (95% CI, −3.3 to −0.7; P = .003), and −0.7 for FCR distress (95% CI, −1.3 to −0.1; P = .03). The decrease in FCR severity (but not triggers or distress) remained statistically significant after adjustment for other covariates ( P = .04). At 6 months, the intervention group also reported lower stress (−1.6; 95% CI, −3.1 to −0.2; P = .03) and improved melanoma-related knowledge (1.7; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6; P < .001) compared with the control group. No differences were found between groups for other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

This newly developed evidence-based psychoeducational intervention was effective in reducing FCR and stress and increasing melanoma-related knowledge in people at high risk for another melanoma.

The Association Between Excision Margins and Local Recurrence in 11,290 Thin (T1) Primary Cutaneous Melanomas: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

At presentation, most primary cutaneous melanomas are "thin" (Breslow thickness ≤1 mm, designated T1 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) and local recurrence (LR) is rare. Most current management guidelines recommend 1 cm surgical excision margins for T1 melanomas, but evidence to support this recommendation is sparse. We sought to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with LR in patients with T1 melanomas that might guide primary tumor management.

METHODS

From a large, prospectively collected, single-institution database, patients with primary cutaneous melanomas ≤1 mm thick diagnosed between 1970 and 2011 who developed LR were identified and matched with controls. Clinical and pathologic parameters were analyzed for their association with LR.

RESULTS

From 11,290 primary melanomas ≤1 mm thick, 176 (1.56 %) cases with LR were identified and 176 controls (without LR) were selected. LR occurred after a median time of 37 months (range 3-306 months) and was associated with narrower excision margins (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95 % confidence interval 0.92-0.98, p = 0.001), desmoplastic, acral, and lentigo maligna melanoma subtypes (p = 0.008), and melanomas composed predominantly of spindle cells (p = 0.005). However, Breslow thickness, Clark level, ulceration, mitotic rate, regression, and lymphovascular invasion were not.

CONCLUSIONS

LR was associated with <8 mm histologic excision margins (corresponding to <1 cm margins in vivo) and desmoplastic, acral, and lentigo maligna melanoma subtypes. This study provides evidence that a ≥1 cm clinical excision margin for thin (T1) primary melanomas reduces the risk of LR.

Prospective evaluation of follow-up in melanoma patients in Germany - results of a multicentre and longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Patient numbers requiring long-term melanoma surveillance are constantly rising. Surveillance is costly and guideline recommendations vary substantially.

METHODS

In this German nationwide study, information on surveillance and treatment of patients diagnosed with melanoma and melanoma in situ (MMis) between April and June 2008 was prospectively collected over four years. Additionally, patient self-report questionnaires were evaluated to assess anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, socio-demographic information and use of disease specific health information sources at year 4 after primary diagnosis.

RESULTS

Complete data was available for 668 patients from 67 centres, of whom 96.0% were in regular melanoma surveillance. In year 3-4 of surveillance, only 55.6% of locoregionary metastases were detected during surveillance visits. Only 33.3% were self-detected by the patient even though 69.4% were documented as being clinically visible or palpable. Costs of 4year surveillance of 550 patients without tumour recurrence (stage I-IIC and MMis) accumulated to 228,155.75 €. Guideline-adherence for follow-up frequency, lymph node ultrasound, S100 serum level tests and diagnostic imaging recommendations was approximately 60% in year 3-4 of surveillance. Multivariate regression analysis showed that certain patient/tumour characteristics and regional differences were significantly associated with guideline deviations. The percentage of patients who exceeded published cut-off scores indicating clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression were significantly increased. Patients frequently reported lack of psychosocial support and education but ascribed great importance to these.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend further reduction of melanoma follow-up in low-risk melanoma patients and improvement of psycho-social support and patient education for all melanoma patients.

Intensity of follow-up after melanoma surgery

This contemporary review of melanoma surveillance strategies seeks to help practitioners examine and improve their surveillance protocols based on the currently available data. In general, there is no definitive benefit from increased screening or more aggressive use of interval imaging. Low-intensity surveillance strategies do not appear to adversely affect patient outcomes and should be the preferred approach compared with high-intensity strategies for most melanoma patients. All surveillance programs should emphasize education in order to maximize the effectiveness of patient-based detection of recurrent disease.

Psychological stress and melanoma: are we meeting our patients' psychological needs?

Approximately 30% of all patients diagnosed with melanoma report levels of psychological distress indicative of the need for clinical intervention. Despite this, the psychological and emotional needs of patients frequently go undetected and unmet. This contribution aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a succinct update on our understanding of the psychosocial challenges faced by individuals with melanoma. There is now strong evidence that psychological interventions can improve psychosocial outcomes for patients with melanoma, including reductions in general mood disturbance, depression, and anxiety. Further prospective cohort studies are required for a better understanding of the impact of psychological stress on melanoma survival and recurrence, as well as the potential psycho-neuro-immunological mechanisms involved.

Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review

There are no evidence-based guidelines for the surveillance of patients with melanoma following surgical treatment. We carried out a systematic review to identify by country and physician specialty the current stage-specific surveillance practices for patients with melanoma. Three major medical indices, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library database, and Scopus, were reviewed to identify articles published from January 1970 to October 2011 that included detailed information about the surveillance of patients with melanoma after the initial surgical treatment. Data on surveillance intervals and recommended evaluation were extracted and categorized by country and, when reported, physician specialty. One hundred and four articles from 10 countries and four physician specialties (dermatology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, and general practice) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 43 providing specific patient-level data. The articles showed a wide variation with respect to the surveillance intervals and recommended evaluations. The variation was greatest for patients with stage I disease, for whom the follow-up frequency ranged from one to six visits per year during years 1 and 2 after treatment. All four physician specialties agreed that for years 1-3, the follow-up frequency should be four times per year for all patients. For years 4 and 5, surgical oncologists recommended two follow-up visits per year, whereas general practitioners, dermatologists, and medical oncologists recommended four visits per year. Recommended imaging and laboratory evaluations were most intense in the UK and most minimalist in the Netherlands. Although general practitioners did not recommend routine laboratory or imaging tests for surveillance, all other specialties utilized both in their surveillance practice. Self skin-examination was recommended for surveillance in all countries and by all practitioner specialties. There are significant intercountry and interspecialty variations in the surveillance of patients with melanoma. As the number of melanoma survivors increases, it will be critical to examine the benefits and costs of various follow-up strategies to establish consensus guidelines for melanoma post-treatment surveillance.

Psychosocial aspects of post-treatment follow-up for stage I/II melanoma: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Patients treated for melanoma are advised to have lifelong full body skin examinations. Extended intervals between examinations have been proposed, but although this may be clinically effective, psychosocial aspects of follow-up are not well understood. This systematic review summarised patient and clinician preferences, experiences and adherence with recommended follow-up of stage I/II melanoma.

METHODS

Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, ACP Journal Club and NHS Economic Evaluation Database were searched from database inception to week 3 April 2010, to identify original studies of psychosocial outcomes of follow-up after treatment of stage I/II primary cutaneous melanoma, as reported by patients or clinicians. The results were synthesised, and characteristics likely to maximise patients' well-being and adherence to follow-up schedules were proposed.

RESULTS

We found 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Anxiety with melanoma follow-up was common; patients valued reassurance, information and psychosocial support, but long-term adherence to schedules was variable. Some wanted more emotional support from their clinician than was provided. Clinicians sometimes ordered additional blood and imaging tests to reassure patients. GPs were hesitant to conduct melanoma follow-up, but a trial providing technical training and protocols reported positive outcomes. Both patients and GPs wanted prompt access to melanoma specialists when suspicious lesions were found.

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial aspects of follow-up impact on patient well-being and potential adherence to schedules, and may influence clinician practice. If follow-up schedules or personnel are to be revised, psychosocial impacts on patients must be explicitly addressed, as well as guidance and specialist support for clinicians.

Effectiveness and causes for failure of surveillance of CDKN2A-mutated melanoma families

BACKGROUND

For more than 25 years families with an increased susceptibility to melanoma have been under surveillance at our institution.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the effectiveness of surveillance for CDKN2A-mutated families and causes for failure of the program in patients with more advanced tumors.

METHODS

In a retrospective case-control study, Breslow thickness of melanomas diagnosed in relatives enrolled in the surveillance program were compared with melanomas of unscreened index patients. We investigated the influence of mode of detection and length of surveillance interval on outcome.

RESULTS

Surveillance melanomas (n = 226, median thickness: 0.50 mm) had a significantly lower Breslow thickness (multiplication factor: 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.47-0.80], P < .001) than index melanomas (n = 40, median thickness: 0.98 mm). Index melanomas were more likely diagnosed with a Breslow thickness greater than 1.0 mm (odds ratio: 3.1 [95% confidence interval 1.2-8.1], P = .022). In all, 53% of surveillance melanomas were diagnosed during regular screens, 7% during patients' first screen, 20% between regular screens, and 20% in patients who were noncompliant with the surveillance schedule. The majority of surveillance melanomas (58%) were detected within 6 months after the last screen. There was no correlation between tumor thickness and the length of the screening interval for tumors diagnosed within 24 months since the last screen.

LIMITATIONS

The study is retrospective.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance was associated with earlier detection of melanomas. Noncompliance was an important cause for failing surveillance. Shortening surveillance intervals may advance detection of tumors, but may paradoxically have little impact on prognosis.

Detection of melanoma nodal metastases; differences in detection between elderly and younger patients do not affect survival

BACKGROUND

Melanoma lymph nodes metastases may be detected by patients or by physicians. Understanding the outcomes of self-detection or physician detection is essential for the design of follow-up studies. We evaluated the role of the method of detection in nodal disease in the prognosis of melanoma patients who underwent therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All melanoma patients with palpable lymph nodes were included in a prospective database (n = 98), and the method of detection was recorded. Detection of lymph node metastases compared with pathological findings in the TLND was assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Nodal metastases were detected by physicians in 45% and by patients in 55% (P < 0.001). Age was significantly associated with method of detection. Patients ≤60 years detected 69% their lymph node metastases as opposed to 32% of patients >60 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.3; P = 0.007). However, this was not associated with prognostic findings in TLND, number of positive nodes, tumor size, or extranodal spread. Method of detection or age at the time of nodal metastases was not significantly associated with 2-year DFS or DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

45% of all lymph node metastases in stage I-II melanoma patients are physician detected. Younger patients detect their own lymph node metastases significantly more often than elderly patients. However, neither the method of detection nor age correlates with DSS. More frequent follow-up would not alter DFS and DSS significantly.

Detection of First Relapse in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: Implications for the Formulation of Evidence-Based Follow-up Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The value of follow-up surveillance for patients with cutaneous melanoma remains uncertain. In this prospective study the frequency of detection of first melanoma recurrence (FMR) by patient or doctor was analyzed to assist in the future design of evidence-based follow-up guidelines.

METHODS

Patients who had a recurrence of a previously treated American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I-III primary melanoma (PM) were interviewed to ascertain how their PM and FMR were detected. Factors predicting the detection of PM and FMR were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 211 patients. In 168 patients, information on detection of their PM was available; 102 PMs (61%) were detected by the patient and 18 (11%) by their partner. Higher AJCC stage, visible location for the patient, and female sex were independent predictive factors for patient-detected PM (P = .03, .002, and .02 respectively). The FMR type was local in 28 (13%), in transit in 35 (17%), in regional lymph nodes in 97 (46%), and distant in 51 (24%). Seventy-three percent of all FMRs were detected by the patient. The presence of a symptom was the only independent predictor of a patient-detected FMR (P < .0001). There was no statistically significant survival difference between the patient-detected and doctor-detected FMRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-quarters of FMRs were detected by patients or their partners, and it should be possible to improve this rate even further by better education. More frequent follow-up visits are thus unlikely to be valuable. Reductions in follow-up frequency may therefore be safe and economically responsible.

[Diagnostic modalities of visceral metastases during follow-up of patients with stage I-II melanoma]

INTRODUCTION

Although not recommended in France at the consensus conference of 1994, routine monitoring of patients with stage I melanoma using imaging techniques is commonly carried out. The aim of this retrospective regional study was to define methods for diagnosing transition to the metastatic stage of melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study based on questionnaires among dermatologists in the Champagne-Ardenne and southern Aisne regions of France. For each patient with stage IV melanoma between 1987 and 2002, data were collected concerning the primary melanoma (date of diagnosis, clinical picture, histopathologic features), stage of melanoma prior to diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and characteristics of the metastases (date, number, type, site and modern discovery: clinical signs or routine imaging).

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients (63 men and 45 women; mean age: 59 years) were included in the study. The predominant site of the primary melanoma was the trunk for men (n=31) and the lower limbs for women (n=16) and the mean Breslow index was 4.31 mm (SD=4.22), with histologic ulceration being present in 40% of cases. The mean time to transition to stage IV after discovery of the primary tumour was 2.8 years (SD=2.95). The modes of discovery of metastases comprised clinical examination (functional signs or physical examination) in 58 cases and routine imaging in 50 cases, with no significant differences based on whether patients were initially in stage I-II or in stage III.

DISCUSSION

This study shows that over half of patients progressing to stage IV melanoma had a suspicious sign or clinical symptom, once again highlighting the importance of clinical monitoring. In contrast, many organ metastases, particularly pulmonary, were discovered by routine imaging examinations carried out as part of patient follow-up, although this is not currently recommended practice in France.

CONCLUSION

The role of powerful imaging examinations such as scans, with constantly improving resolution, still remains to be defined in the follow-up of patients with stage I-II melanoma, and further prospective studies are thus required.

The Conundrum of Follow-Up: Should it be Abandoned?

This article critically evaluates the practice of follow-up for patients who have undergone treatment for a primary melanoma without evidence of metastases. One conclusion from this analysis is that the benefits of routine imaging and blood testing are insufficient to warrant a place in routine follow-up. Few patients who have metastases are identified in this fashion and even fewer survive because they underwent these tests. Far more often, false-positive results occur, which invariably cause unnecessary concern, lead to additional unnecessary testing, and may even result in needless surgery. Based on the evidence available, the relevance of follow-up per se must even be challenged. No convincing evidence exists that regional control, survival, and quality of life improve through surveillance. Other reasons for surveillance may be present, but these are less imperative. The present findings challenge current practice.

Follow-up in patients with localised primary cutaneous melanoma

Follow-up services for patients with localised cutaneous melanoma are widely discussed but there is no international consensus. Our aim was to discuss frequency and duration of follow-up, type of health professional involved, optimum intensity of routine investigation, and patients' satisfaction with follow-up. Searches of the published work were directed at publications between January, 1985, and February, 2004 on recurrences, subsequent primary melanoma, routine tests, and patients' satisfaction. In a selection of 72 articles, 2142 (6.6%) recurrences were reported, 62% of which were detected by the patients themselves. 2.6% of patients developed a subsequent primary melanoma. Most investigators do not support high-intensity routine follow-up investigations. Of the various follow-up investigations requested by physicians, only medical history and physical examination seem to be cost effective. Lymph-node sonography seems to be a promising method for detection, although survival benefit remains to be proven. Patients were found to be anxious about follow-up visits, although other research showed that provision of information to patients was much appreciated. Published work on the follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma has mainly been retrospective and descriptive. Recommendations can be given with only a low grade of evidence. For meaningful guidelines to be developed, prospective, high-quality methodological research is needed.

Psychological adjustment to the melanoma experience

OBJECTIVES

To provide a review of the literature on the psychological adjustment to malignant melanoma.

DATA SOURCES

Research reports and review articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Three prominent themes evolved from the literature: (1) delineation of issues concerning long-term survivorship and quality of life following a diagnosis of melanoma; (2) coping with metastatic and end-stage melanoma; and (3) identification of the possible link between immunomodulation and the evolution of melanoma.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses must individualize their support and counsel according to the potential trajectory of the patient's melanoma experience. Nurses need to identify an individual's risk for psychological distress and help them enhance coping skills.