Clinical activity and benefit of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with colorectal cancer truly resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)

Development of a novel sialic acid-conjugated camptothecin prodrug for enhanced cancer chemotherapy

Camptothecin (CPT) is an attractive natural drug for cancer chemotherapy. However, the poor water solubility, non-targeting feature, and adverse side effects of CPT are significant obstacles to developing an effective anticancer drug. Here, for the first time, 9-thiol-sialic acid (9-SH-Sia) is coupled to CPT by forming a disulfide releasable carbonate linkage, resulting in a novel CPT prodrug (CPT-ss-Sia) that self-assembles into nanostructures in an aqueous solution. Strikingly, CPT-ss-Sia exhibited excellent in vitro properties, including enhanced water solubility, glutathione (GSH)-triggered CPT release, and increased E-lactone ring stability. Furthermore, CPT-ss-Sia had good cancer cell-killing ability comparable to CPT. Intravenous administration of CPT-ss-Sia significantly inhibited the growth of multiple types of tumors. Histological analysis showed that CPT-ss-Sia treatment significantly reduced lesions in tumor-bearing mice compared to CPT treatment. Notably, CPT-ss-Sia treatment did not adversely affect the body weight of the mice. This is the first report of the 9-SH-Sia conjugate-based prodrug. Overall, CPT-ss-Sia has broad clinical application prospects.

The efficacy and safety of irinotecan ± bevacizumab compared with oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (IRI)-based and oxaliplatin (OXA)-based regimens are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several studies have published inconsistent results in their comparisons of the efficacy and toxicity of IRI ± bevacizumab and OXA ± bevacizumab. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these 2 regimens in patients with mCRC.

METHODS

We searched several databases to identify relevant studies, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). The secondary comparisons were overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity. In addition, the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) values with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from these studies.

RESULTS

Pooled data of 13 studies demonstrated no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86-1.08, P = .53) and TTP (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.72-1.08, P = .24) between the 2 groups. However, the ORR (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97, P = .02) was clearly improved in the OXA ± bevacizumab arm. Higher incidences of grade 3/4 nausea (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28-2.07, P < .001), vomiting (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09-1.81, P = .01), diarrhea (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.23-1.70, P < .001), and anemia (RR = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.75-6.22, P < .001) were observed in the IRI group. However, the incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68-0.83, P < .001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.73, P = .002), and paresthesia/neurological disturbances (RR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02-0.07, P < .001) were higher in the OXA group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirmed that the OXA ± bevacizumab regimen as a maintenance therapy significantly improved the ORR in patients with mCRC. Exhibiting strong efficacy and safety, the OXA and OXA plus bevacizumab regimens are preferred as first-line treatments for mCRC.

Enhancing chemoradiation of colorectal cancer through targeted delivery of raltitrexed by hyaluronic acid coated nanoparticles

Combined modality therapy incorporating raltitrexed (RTX), a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, and radiation can lead to improved outcome for rectal cancer patients. To increase delivery and treatment efficacy, we formulated a hyaluronic acid (HA) coated nanoparticle encapsulating RTX (HARPs) through layer-by-layer assembly. These particles were determined to have a diameter of ∼115 nm, with a polydispersity index of 0.112 and a zeta potential of -22 mV. Cell uptake in CT26 cells determined through flow cytometry showed a ∼5-fold increase between untargeted and HA-coated particles. Through viability and DNA damage assays, we assessed the potency of the free RTX and HARPs, and found increased DNA damage in cells treated with the RTX-loaded nanoparticles administered concurrently with radiation. In vivo efficacy through tumor growth inhibition was investigated in a syngeneic murine colorectal cancer model. Nanoparticle treatment showed no acute toxicity in vivo, and all treatments showed survival benefits for their respective groups compared to controls. HARPs alone slowed tumor growth, although not significantly. Radiation alone and in combination with the HARPs showed significant growth delay. Notably, the combination treatment significantly hindered tumor progression relative to the HARPs highlighting the benefit of this multipronged treatment. These results provide a foundation for loading RTX in a nanoparticle formulation, and establish a combined radiation and drug dosing schedule to determine optimal tumor growth delay and subsequent treatment efficacy.

Irinotecan Combined with Bolus 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Is This Really a Dangerous Treatment?

Rothenberg et al called for caution in the palliative use of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and leucovorin (IFL schedule), because of early treatment related deaths in C89803 and N9741 studies. The objective of our multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of 5-FU bolus, folinic acid (FA) and irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. From December 1999 to June 2002 138 patients (pts) were treated. The chemotherapy regimen was as follows: irinotecan 125 mg/m2 i.v. over 90 min and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 preceded by FA 20 mg/m2, both given by bolus, weekly, for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Total number of administered cycles was 404. Average dose intensity was 75%. 47 out of 131 evaluable pts achieved a complete (n = 6) or partial (n = 41) response, leading to an overall response rate (RR) of 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24% to 48%], stable disease was registered in 50 (38%). The estimated median time to progression and survival were 6.5 months (95% CI 5.2-9.4) and 16.6 months (95% CI 15.1-19.3) respectively. Two-year survival was 35%. Toxicity was well manageable. In 18 (13.8%) pts the chemotherapy was stopped because of toxicity. Treatment related death was not observed. Close clinical monitoring, early recognition of toxicity, immediate therapeutic intervention are recommended for pts receiving IFL. In our experience this regimen has manageable toxicity and appropriate level of dose intensity and seems to be a good option for first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Single-agent irinotecan or FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer; results of a randomised phase II study (DaVINCI) and meta-analysis [corrected]

BACKGROUND

Second-line treatment with irinotecan for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer prolongs survival. It is uncertain whether irinotecan is better administered with 5-fluorouracil or alone in patients previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine. We compared toxicity (particularly diarrhoea), quality of life, and efficacy of combination chemotherapy and irinotecan in these patients.

METHODS

In DaVINCI, a randomised phase II trial, patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly allocated to: Combination therapy (FOLFIRI), irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (400mg/m(2) IV bolus and 2400 mg/m(2) by 46-hour infusion from day 1) and folinic acid (20mg/m(2) IV bolus, day 1), 2-weekly; or Single-agent, irinotecan (350 mg/m(2) IV over 90 min), 3-weekly. Toxicity was evaluated every treatment cycle; QOL and response 6-weekly. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial, amended from a larger factorial design, was terminated early due to slow recruitment. Results were also combined with other second-line irinotecan trials.

FINDINGS

We randomised 44 patients to combination and 45 to single agent. Eight patients in the irinotecan arm and 4 in the combination arm had grade 3/4 diarrhoea (P=0.24). Treatment groups did not differ significantly in overall QOL changes, response rate or progression free or overall-survival. In a systematic review of 29 trials of second-line irinotecan-based treatment, single-agent irinotecan was associated with more diarrhoea and alopecia than the combination but efficacy was similar.

INTERPRETATION

Combination treatment compared with single-agent irinotecan reduces alopecia and diarrhoea without compromising efficacy on clinical outcomes. Both regimens remain as reasonable treatment options.

FUNDING

Research grant (Pfizer).

A systematic review of the use of quality of life measures in colorectal cancer research with attention to outcomes in elderly patients

PURPOSE

Quality of life (QOL) measures are critical to the evaluation of new cancer treatments, particularly for elderly patients. Our intent was to assess patterns of use of QOL endpoints in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment research and to summarize current knowledge about how CRC treatment affects elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for English-language, human trials published from 1995 to 2005 that met the following criteria: reported on patients with CRC, were not surgery-only cohorts, and included a QOL or functional endpoints. Trials specifically reporting data on elderly patients were reviewed in depth and summarized.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one eligible studies and 10 trials with elderly-specific data were found. The median number of trials published annually increased from 5 (range, 4-8 trials) between 1995 and 1999 to 14.5 (range, 11-22 trials) between 2000 and 2005. Chemotherapy was the most commonly studied treatment (55%), and metastatic CRC (55%) was the most commonly studied population. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30, with or without C38, was the most frequently used instrument (49%). Studies reporting on elderly patients showed that many patients experience a decline in physical function immediately after surgery and have increased need for supportive services. Little information is available on the effect of chemotherapy in elderly patients. Use of QOL and functional measures in treatment-related CRC research has increased; however, it continues to be hampered by a lack of dissemination and methodologic problems.

CONCLUSION

Missing data from patient attrition, limitations of assessment methods, and a small number of patients treated with chemotherapy in the trials reporting on elderly patients seriously limit our ability to draw conclusions from this survey about how treatment affects QOL or function in CRC.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. The integration of cytotoxics and biologicals in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed dramatically over the last five years, with increasing chances of prolonged survival. The development of new drugs has contributed to the better outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Until the mid-1990s the only available drug, with limited activity in metastatic CRC, was 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The development of the cytotoxic agents irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine and of the monoclonal antibodies against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) bevacizumab and against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) cetuximab and panitumumab have clearly increased the therapeutic options and have improved the outcome for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, their introduction also raises many new questions and challenges.

Hepatic resection after rescue cetuximab treatment for colorectal liver metastases previously refractory to conventional systemic therapy

PURPOSE

In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) resistant to first-line chemotherapy, the impact of cetuximab therapy on resectability is unknown. This study was performed to determine the post-cetuximab resectability rate and to examine postoperative outcomes for these heavily pretreated patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2004 to April 2006, we evaluated 151 patients with unresectable CLM resistant to initial chemotherapy and subsequently treated with systemic cetuximab. Resectability rates, patient outcomes, and tumoral and nontumoral liver pathology were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients underwent surgery after a median of six cycles of cetuximab + irinotecan (20 of 27), oxaliplatin (four of 27), or both (one of 27). Eighteen patients (67%) had experienced treatment failure after at least two lines of chemotherapy before cetuximab. Twenty-five of the 27 patients who had surgery underwent hepatectomy: nine of 133 patients who were treated completely at our institution (resectability rate, 7%) and 16 of 18 patients who were referred from other institutions after systemic cetuximab therapy. Postoperative mortality was 3.7% (one of 27), with a complication rate of 50%. Histopathologic liver abnormalities were found in nine patients (36%), without specific lesions attributable to cetuximab. After median follow-up of 16 months, 23 of 25 patients who underwent resection (92%) were alive, and 10 patients (40%) were disease free. Median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from initiation of cetuximab therapy were 20 and 13 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For CLM refractory to conventional chemotherapy, combination therapy with cetuximab increases resectability rates without increasing operative mortality or liver injury. The median OS and PFS of 20 and 13 months, respectively, suggest that this novel oncosurgical strategy benefits patients with previously refractory disease who respond subsequently to cetuximab.

Sequential administration of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) at relapse versus CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase III randomized study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the sequence of administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11), or CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with ACC were allocated to the following treatment groups: group A, a bolus of 20 mg/m(2) LV and 425 mg/m(2) 5-FU for 5 days until progression/relapse, and upon progression treatment with weekly CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)), and group B, CPT-11 followed at progression/relapse by 5-FU/LV at the same doses and schedules as in group A.

RESULTS

120 patients were randomized to receive one of the two treatment sequences and their pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between treatment arms. No statistically significant difference was found in the objective response rate to CPT-11 (p = 0.45); partial response (PR) was 23.3% for group A patients and 33.3% for group B. Following documented progression and second line treatment there was a significant difference between the response rate in group A (23.3%) and group B where no patients were found to respond to second-line treatment with 5-FU/LV (p = 0.024). The median overall survival was 42.0 weeks (range, 36.6-47.4 weeks) for group A and 32.0 weeks (range, 28.2-35.8 weeks) for group B. The median time to progression for patients in group A following first-line 5-FU/LV was 18 weeks (range, 10-36 weeks) and 12 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks) for group B following first-line CPT-11 (p = 0.0005). Toxicity, according to WHO, was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating patients with CPT-11 upon progression to 5-FU/LV treatment seems to be superior to the opposite sequence. We used these treatments as sequential monotherapies (at progression/relapse), and the best results are gained when 5-FU/LV is followed by CPT-11 at disease progression or relapse.

Modeling biological rhythms in failure time data

Background

The human body exhibits a variety of biological rhythms. There are patterns that correspond, among others, to the daily wake/sleep cycle, a yearly seasonal cycle and, in women, the menstrual cycle. Sine/cosine functions are often used to model biological patterns for continuous data, but this model is not appropriate for analysis of biological rhythms in failure time data.

Methods

We adapt the cosinor method to the proportional hazards model and present a method to provide an estimate and confidence interval of the time when the minimum hazard is achieved. We then apply this model to data taken from a clinical trial of adjuvant of pre-menopausal breast cancer patients.

Results

The application of this technique to the breast cancer data revealed that the optimal day for pre-resection incisional or excisional biopsy of 28-day cycle (i. e. the day associated with the lowest recurrence rate) is day 8 with 95% confidence interval of 4–12 days. We found that older age, fewer positive nodes, smaller tumor size, and experimental treatment were predictive of longer relapse-free survival.

Conclusion

In this paper we have described a method for modeling failure time data with an underlying biological rhythm. The advantage of adapting a cosinor model to proportional hazards model is its ability to model right censored data. We have presented a method to provide an estimate and confidence interval of the day in the menstrual cycle where the minimum hazard is achieved. This method is not limited to breast cancer data, and may be applied to any biological rhythms linked to right censored data.

Irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Out of every 17-18 individuals in the US, one develops colorectal cancer (CRC) in their lifetime. Of individuals diagnosed with CRC, > 50% present or develop metastatic disease, which, if untreated, is associated with 6-9 months median survival. Although surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for CRC, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic or unresectable disease. For nearly three decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the chemotherapy of choice for treatment of CRC. However, the response rates to single 5-FU therapy have been suboptimal with an objective tumour response of 10-20%. Attempts have been made to improve the efficacy of 5-FU by either schedule alteration (protracted infusion versus intravenous push) or biochemical modulation with leucovorin (LV). Continuous infusion induced more tumour regression and prolonged the time-to-disease progression with some significant impact on survival (11.3 versus 12.1 months; p < 0.04). 5-FU/LV resulted in a significant increase in overall response rates and in the prolongation of disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting, although severe toxicities represent a major clinical problem. The last 10 years have seen the addition of several new agents such as irinotecan, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, bevacizumab and cetuximab. The prognosis has significantly improved with the addition of these agents, with median survivals now > 20 months. This review paper focuses on irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed when used alone and in combination.

A phase II study of FOLFIRI-3 (double infusion of irinotecan combined with LV5FU) after FOLFOX in advanced colorectal cancer patients

In advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin, efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy is poor and the best regimen is not defined. We designed FOLFIRI-3 and conducted a phase II study to establish its efficacy and safety in advanced colorectal cancer patients previously treated with FOLFOX. FOLFIRI-3 consisted of irinotecan 100 mg m⁻² as a 60-min infusion on day 1, running concurrently with leucovorin 200 mg m⁻² as a 2-h infusion on day 1, followed by 46-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 2000 mg m⁻², and irinotecan 100 mg m⁻² repeated on day 3, at the end of the 5FU infusion, every 2 weeks. Sixty-five patients entered the study. The intent-to-treat objective response rate was 23% (95% CI 13–33%). Disease was stable in 37% of patients, progressed in 26% and was not assessable in 14%. From the start of FOLFIRI-3, median progression-free survival was 4.7 months and median survival 10.5 months. Main toxicities (% of patients) were grade 3–4 diarrhoea 23% and grade 4 neutropenia 11%. FOLFIRI-3 is a promising regimen achieving high response rate and progression-free survival in patients previously treated with FOLFOX with a moderate toxicity.

A phase I dose-finding clinical pharmacokinetic study of an oral formulation of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Oral administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) should allow sustained exposure to the drug without the inconvenience of intravenous delivery and with fewer side-effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present phase I trial of CPT-11, administered orally as a powder-filled capsule for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 30 to 90 mg/m(2)/day, was conducted in 47 patients for whom a satisfactory standard treatment option was no longer available (24 males/23 females; median age 51 years, range 26-85). Tumour types included melanoma (11), colorectal (4), urinary tract (3), lung/pleura (4), thyroid (3), liver (3), gallbladder (2), cervix/uterus (3), breast (2), pancreas (2), carcinoma and other cancer types (10).

RESULTS

A total of 171 cycles were administered (median 3, range 1-11). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred during the first cycle in five of 31 patients in the dose-escalation part of the study: one patient at the 50 mg/m(2)/day dose level (diarrhoea grade 4); one patient at the 80 mg/m(2)/day dose level (prolonged neutropenia grade 4 and diarrhoea grade 3); and three patients at the 90 mg/m(2)/day dose level (diarrhoea, vomiting and neutropenia). The 80 mg/m(2)/day dose level was expanded, as a feasibility study, to include 16 additional patients, five of whom had received extensive prior pelvic irradiation. A further three patients in this cohort experienced DLTs, two of whom had received extensive prior pelvic irradiation. One patient died on study day 15 during the first cycle of oral CPT-11 following grade 3 diarrhoea, febrile neutropenia and a necrotic enterocolitis. Overall the grade 3/4 toxicities in 47 patients were asthenia (19%), anorexia (17%), neutropenia (14.9 %), diarrhoea (13%), nausea (12.7%), vomiting (8.5%) and thrombocytopenia (8.5%). Partial responses were observed in two melanoma patients and disease stabilisation was noted in 17 (36.1%) patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were recorded for 46 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

At the maximum tolerated dose, defined as 80 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 3 weeks, oral CPT-11 was shown to be well tolerated and safe with few of the haematological toxicities associated with the intravenous formulation.

Randomised phase II study of standard versus chronomodulated CPT-11 plus chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer patients

In this study, a randomised phase II trial explored the effects of 6-h chronomodulated CPT-11 infusion in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Sixty-eight pre-treated patients were randomly assigned to CPT-11 administered at 180 mg/m2 on day 1, by 1-h infusion (Arm A) or 6-h sinusoidal infusion with peak timing at 5:00 a.m. (Arm B). All patients also received chronomodulated folinic acid/5-fluorouracil (FA/5-FU). Patients in Arm B obtained a 25.7% response rate for 7.0 months duration, a progression-free survival for 8.0 months and a median survival of 28 months. The same data in Arm A were 18.2%, 4.5, 6.0 and 18 months, respectively. No differences in drugs dose-intensity or increased toxicity with prolonged chronomodulated infusion were detected. Major grade 3-4 toxicity was diarrhoea: 10 patients in Arm A and 13 in Arm B. In conclusion, this study has shown that chronomodulated infusion of CPT-11 and FA/5-FU is safe, active and can be integrated with oxaliplatin (EORTC 05011) for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study with dose adjustment according to baseline serum bilirubin level

This study assessed the clinical activity and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using dose adjustment according to baseline serum bilirubin level. Patients with advanced HCC received CPT-11 at a dose of 350 mg/m(2) when total bilirubin level was 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (group A), or 200 mg/m(2) when total bilirubin level was between 1.51 and 3 ULN (group B). No objective response, one minor response and 12 disease stabilizations were observed in the 29 patients (group A, 23; group B, 6) enrolled. Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-4.0) and 7.4 months (95% CI: 3.9-12.0), respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events (mostly neutropenia [47%], anaemia [24%], and diarrhoea [17%]) were more frequent in group A (74%) than in group B (33%) (P = 0.086). This study found favourable toxicity profile using dosage adjustment to the baseline total bilirubin level in patients with bilirubin level comprised between 1.51 and 3 ULN. However, the antitumour activity of single agent CPT-11 was not significant in advanced HCC.

Single-agent irinotecan for recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and factors affecting the survival rate of patients treated with irinotecan.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data from the medical records of 74 patients who had recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer treated with single-agent irinotecan were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age for all the patients was 56 years (range 19-77). Forty-one (55%) and 33 (45%) patients had recurrent and/or metastatic colon cancer, respectively. All the patients were treated with irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) every 21 days. Grade 3-4 emesis, grade 3-4 diarrhea, grade 3-4 neutropenia and severe early cholinergic events developed in 7, 15, 7 and 1.3% of patients, respectively. One patient died due to acute renal failure. The overall response rate was 14% (complete response 5%, partial response 9%); 61% had stable response while another 25% had progressive disease. Patients with multiple metastatic foci, patients < or =50 years of age and patients with peritonitis carcinomatosa were shown to have worse outcomes than others. The median duration of response was 16.7 months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4 and 14 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The data show that irinotecan was useful in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer with acceptable toxicity.

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) as first line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer

Irinotecan exerts its cytotoxic activity through inhibition of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. It has been approved in most countries worldwide for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Activity is seen in previously untreated patients and in patients refractory to fluorouracil treatment, whether it is given alone or in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Irinotecan was first developed in patients refractory to fluorouracil. Activity in terms of tumour responses and patient benefit was seen in several phase II trials that used either a weekly or a three-weekly schedule. In two randomised trials (irinotecan vs best supportive care, and irinotecan vs an infused fluorouracil-based regimen), irinotecan prolonged median survival by approximately 2.5 months without any deterioration in quality-of-life. It was later studied in previously untreated patients with advanced CRC in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin). In three large randomised trials, median time to tumour progression was prolonged by approximately 2.5 months and overall survival by about 2.5 months compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid alone. Tumour responses were also seen more frequently in the irinotecan arm (35-40% vs 20%). Again, quality-of-life scores were not deteriorated by the addition of irinotecan. Irinotecan has many acute adverse effects. The most prominent and dose limiting being diarrhoea and neutropenia. With irinotecan monotherapy, diarrhoea was seen in 80% of patients and severe grade 3 to 4 diarrhoea occurred in 30-40% of the patients. The severity of diarrhoea can be diminished by preventive actions. Less risk of diarrhoea is generally seen when irinotecan is combined with fluorouracil. Neutropenia is generally short-lived, but may be severe if diarrhoea is also present. This has been noticed particularly when irinotecan has been given in combination with a bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid regimen. Other toxicities include acute cholinergic-like symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. In spite of these adverse effects, irinotecan has been accepted as an important first-line treatment for patients with advanced CRC, in combination with, preferably, an infused fluorouracil-based regimen, and has been approved for use as monotherapy in the second-line indication.

Continuous infusion of oxaliplatin plus chronomodulated capecitabine in 5-fluorouracil- and irinotecan-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to define the feasibility and efficacy of Xelox (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) administered through a new and original schedule in advanced pretreated colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

36 metastatic CRC patients resistant at least to a previous 5-fluorouracil- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy line were included in the study.

TREATMENT

Oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 as continuous infusion for 12 h (8.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m.) on days 1, 8 plus chronomodulated capecitabine 1,750 mg/m2/day per os (8.00 a.m. 25% of total dose; 6.00 p.m. 25% of total dose; 11.00 p.m. 50% of total dose), on days 1-14 every 21 days. 16 (44.4%) patients had previously received only 1 chemotherapy line for metastatic disease and 20 patients (55.6%) 2 chemotherapy lines. Moreover, 12 patients (33.3%) progressed after a first or second line of oxaliplatin-based regimen as well.

RESULTS

Most frequent related G3-4 adverse reactions were diarrhea (11.6%), nausea/vomiting (8.3%), neuropathy (8.3%), mucositis (8.3%), asthenia (16.7%) and hand-foot syndrome (5.5%). G3-4 anemia, leucopenia and liver toxicities were not observed. The overall response rate was 30.6% (11/36 patients). Disease stabilization was observed in 13 patients (36.1%) and progression in 12 patients (34.3%). Between the 12 oxaliplatin-resistant patients, the overall response rate was 25% (3 patients); 6 patients (54.5%) obtained a stable disease, and only 3 patients (25%) progressed. The median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval 7.0-15.7 months), the median response duration 2.8 months (95% confidence interval 1.2-5.6 months) and the median time to progression 6.7 months (95% confidence interval 5.7-6.3 months). The 1-year survival rate was 53.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The high overall tumor growth control, the remarkable median time to progression and overall survival and the good safety profile are of particular interest for patients with heavy pretreated metastatic CRC.

Antitumor activity of beta-cyclodextrin polymer-camptothecin conjugates

Antitumor activity of linear, beta-cyclodextrin polymer (CDP)-camptothecin (CPT) conjugates (HGGG6, LGGG10, HG6, and HGGG10) is investigated in nude mice bearing human LS174T colon carcinoma tumors. These conjugates differ in polymer molecular mass [97 kDa (H) or 35 kDa (L)], CDP-CPT linker structure [glycine (G) or triglycine (GGG)], and CPT loading [ca. 6 wt % (6) or 10 wt % (10)]. Maximum tolerable doses (MTDs) of the three conjugates, LGGG10, HG6, and HGGG10, are determined to be 36, 9, and 9 mg of CPT/kg, respectively, while the MTD of the CDP alone exceeds 240 mg/kg (highest value investigated). The three CDP-CPT conjugates with high polymer molecular masses (HGGG6, HG6, and HGGG10) demonstrate antitumor activity at their MTDs superior to that of CPT at the same amount and to that of irinotecan at its optimal dose. They also show tumor growth inhibition that is superior to that of the conjugate containing the low-molecular mass polymer (LGGG10) at the same dose of CPT. No significant effects of CPT weight loading or linker structure on tumor growth delay are observed. However, conjugates containing G appear to be less toxic than these with GGG. These antitumor studies demonstrate that the CDP-based conjugates of CPT exhibit tumor growth inhibition superior to that of CPT or irinotecan at the conditions employed in this study. The striking observation is that a short course of treatment with the polymer conjugates gives long-term control of tumor growth that does not occur with either CPT or irinotecan. Intracellular CDPs are demonstrated by analyzing cells that were cultured in the presence of rhodamine-labeled CDP (HRhod) containing medium using both confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. The long-term therapeutic efficacy of CDP-CPT conjugates observed in mice may in part be due to the sustained release of CPT from these conjugates in the acidic, intracellular compartments since these conjugates are shown to have significantly slower release rates at acidic pH than at physiological pH.

Phase II trial of fortnightly irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients resistant to previous fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This phase II study investigated the anti-tumour activity and toxicity of CPT-11 (250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 60 minutes) administered every 2 weeks as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n = 63) with histology diagnosis of advanced CRC and proven resistance to previous fluoropyrimidine therapy were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 510 CPT-11 cycles were administered, with a mean of 8 cycles per patient (range: 1-32). The median relative dose intensity was 93%. Partial response (PR) was obtained in 11 patients (17.5%; 95%CI: 8.1%-26.7%) and 29 patients (46.0%) showed stable disease (clinical benefit of 63.5%). The median duration of response was 6.8 months (95%CI: 6.1-7.5 months), median survival was 8.8 months (95%CI: 6.3-11.5 months) and median time to disease progression was 4.5 months (95%CI: 3.9-5.0 months). Overall, this schedule of CPT-11 chemotherapy was well tolerated by the patient. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3/4 haematological toxicity (20.6% of patients and 4.1% of cycles). Neutropenia with concurrent fever or infection occurred in 7 patients (11.1%). Late onset diarrhoea was the most frequent grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity (19.0% of patients and 2.3% of cycles). Other, lower-incidence, toxicities were anaemia, fever, infection, mucositis, nausea and vomiting. There were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that CPT-11, administered as 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 60 minutes every 2 weeks, was active and well tolerated schedule in the second-line chemotherapy of advanced CRC patients. This bi-weekly scheme could be used as an alternative to the weekly or the every-three-week schedule as well as in combined therapies with other chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of advanced, metastatic, CRC.

Phase III randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus FOLFOX4 in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter study of the Gruppo Oncologico Dell'Italia Meridionale

PURPOSE

We performed this phase III study to compare the irinotecan, leucovorin (LV), and fluorouracil (FU) regimen (FOLFIRI) versus the oxaliplatin, LV, and FU regimen (FOLFOX4) in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 360 chemotherapy-naive patients were randomly assigned to receive, every 2 weeks, either arm A (FOLFIRI: irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 with LV 100 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-hour infusion before FU 400 mg/m(2) administered as an intravenous bolus injection, and FU 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-hour infusion immediately after FU bolus injection on days 1 and 2 [LV5FU2]) or arm B (FOLFOX4: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 with LV5FU2 regimen).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four and 172 patients were assessable in arm A and B, respectively. Overall response rates (ORR) were 31% in arm A (95% CI, 24.6% to 38.3%) and 34% in arm B (95% CI, 27.2% to 41.5%; P = .60). In both arms A and B, median time to progression (TTP; 7 v 7 months, respectively), duration of response (9 v 10 months, respectively), and overall survival (OS; 14 v 15 months, respectively) were similar, without any statistically significant difference. Toxicity was mild in both groups: alopecia and gastrointestinal disturbances were the most common toxicities in arm A; thrombocytopenia and neurosensorial were the most common toxicities in arm B. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were uncommon in both arms, and no statistical significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in ORR, TTP, and OS for patients treated with the FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 regimen. Both therapies seemed effective as first-line treatment in these patients. The difference between these two combination therapies is mainly in the toxicity profile.

Second-line therapy for advanced colorectal carcinoma

The past decade has witnessed considerable advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). The emergence and integration into clinical practice of new cytotoxic agents, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, has had a significant impact on outcomes from advanced CRC with median survivals of 18 to 21 months now achievable. Improvements in survival as a consequence of using these drugs as salvage therapies ultimately led to demonstration of efficacy for both in the first-line treatment of CRC. As the importance of second-line therapy is increasingly recognized, key issues, such as optimal schedules, chemotherapy combinations, and sequential therapy, need to be addressed. The integration of newer biologic agents, such as cetuximab and bevacizumab, for which recent data have emerged, has further added to the complexities of delivering therapy to patients with advanced CRC, heralding a new treatment era for this disease.

Optimisation of irinotecan dose in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after 5-FU failure: results from a multinational, randomised phase II study

Although irinotecan 350 mg m⁻² is a standard option for relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer, there is some evidence that suggests that a higher dose may be more effective, with acceptable tolerability, following 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This study assessed the optimal dosing strategy for irinotecan, along with treatment efficacy and safety. A total of 164 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after failure on 5-FU or raltitrexed received either 350 mg m⁻² irinotecan (Group A; n=36) or 250, 350 or 500 mg m⁻², according to individual patient tolerance (Group B; n=62) or based on risk factor optimisation (Group C; n=66). There were no complete responses. There was a trend towards a higher overall response rate in Group B (13%) than in Groups A (8%) and C (9%). Tumour control growth rate was high in all three groups: 58% in group A, 60% in Group B and 50% in Group C. A total of 34% of patients in Group B and 9% in Group C were able to receive a dose of 500 mg m⁻². Median duration of response and time to progression were significantly longer in Groups A and B compared with Group C. No significant between-group differences for any adverse events were seen, although there was a small trend towards better tolerability in Group B. Individual dose escalation based on patient tolerance may allow more patients to receive a higher irinotecan dose without causing additional toxicity and can be an appropriate patient management strategy.

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine (Xeloda) and irinotecan combination therapy (XELIRI) in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tumours

Capecitabine is a highly active oral fluoropyrimidine that is an attractive alternative to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer treatment. The current study, undertaken in 27 patients with gastrointestinal tumours, aimed to assess the toxicity and potential for significant pharmacokinetic interactions of a combination regimen incorporating capecitabine with 3-weekly irinotecan (XELIRI). Irinotecan (200 and 250 mg m(-2)) was administered as a 90-min infusion on day 1 in combination with escalating capecitabine doses (700-1250 mg m(-2) twice daily) administered on days 2-15 of a 3-week treatment cycle. Pharmacokinetics were characterised on days 1 and 2 of the first two cycles. A total of 103 treatment cycles were administered. The principal dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea and neutropenia. Capecitabine 1150 mg m(-2) twice daily with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was identified as the maximum-tolerated dose and capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was identified as the recommended dose for further study. Analyses confirmed that there were no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between the two agents. The combination was clinically active, with complete and partial responses achieved in heavily pretreated patients. This study indicates that XELIRI is a potentially feasible and clinically active regimen in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic, Food Effect, and Pharmacogenetic Study of Oral Irinotecan Given as Semisolid Matrix Capsules in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and food effect of orally administered irinotecan formulated as new semisolid matrix capsules.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Irinotecan was given orally in fasted patients once daily for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to take the drug along with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast for the administration at day 1 of the first or second cycle. Dosages tested were 70 and 80 mg/m(2)/day.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients received 101 cycles of therapy (median two cycles, range 1-15). During the first cycle, grade 3 delayed diarrhea and grade 3 fever were the DLTs at the dosage of 80 mg/m(2)/day in three out of five patients. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild to moderate. Exposure to the active metabolite SN-38 was relatively high compared with i.v. infusion, but no relevant accumulation was observed. Food had no significant effect on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. One confirmed partial remission and 10 disease stabilizations were observed in previously treated patients. No association was found between the UGT1A1*28 genotype and the risk of severe irinotecan-induced toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

For oral irinotecan, a dose of 70 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks is recommended for further studies. Delayed diarrhea was the main DLT, similar to that observed with intravenously administered irinotecan. This study confirms that oral administration of irinotecan is feasible and may have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Phase I dose-escalation trial of irinotecan with continuous infusion 5-FU first line, in metastatic colorectal cancer

This single-centre phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan and the recommended dose to use in combination with a fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered as a protracted venous infusion, for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Tolerability and efficacy were secondary end points. In all, 22 patients, median age 57 years, were treated with escalating, weekly doses of irinotecan (50, 75, 100 and 85 mg m⁻²) in combination with 250 mg m⁻² 5-FU administered as a continuous infusion. All patients had measurable disease. The combination was well tolerated up to an irinotecan dose of 75 mg m⁻². However, three out of five patients at the 100 mg m⁻² irinotecan dose level had their dose reduced due to multiple grade 2 toxicities, and eventually one patient stopped treatment due to grade 3 diarrhoea and multiple grade 2 toxicities. Subsequent patients were recruited at an irinotecan dose level of 85 mg m⁻². The overall response rate was 55%, comprising one complete and 11 partial responses (PRs). Six patients also achieved sustained stable disease (SD), giving a clinical benefit (complete response/PR/SD) response of 82%. The median duration of response was 238 days (8.5 months) and median time to progression was 224 days (8.0 months). Two patients who achieved PRs underwent partial hepatectomies. Thus, irinotecan (85 mg m⁻²) combined with a continuous infusion of 5-FU (250 mg m⁻²) is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of metastatic CRC. It represents an effective treatment for patients who require close supervision and support, throughout their initial exposure to chemotherapy for this disease, and this dose combination was recommended for an ongoing phase II study.

Phase I study of an oral formulation of irinotecan administered daily for 14�days every 3�weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

A phase I study was conducted with oral irinotecan given daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in 45 patients with solid tumours to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, preliminary antitumour response and pharmacokinetics. Irinotecan was administered orally as a powder-filled capsule at doses ranging from 7.5 to 40 mg/m2 per day. Tumours were predominantly colorectal (30) together with 10 other gastrointestinal, 2 breast, 2 small cell lung and 1 ovarian. All but three patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median number of administered cycles was 3 (range 1-19). Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhoea) and one incidence of grade 3 asthenia were dose limiting. There were no grade 3/4 haematological toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m2 per day. There were two documented partial responses, one in a patient with cancer of the small intestine and the other in a patient with colon cancer. Stable disease was seen in 16 patients (35.5%). Peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 2.0-2.4 h. The metabolic ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was 0.17+/-0.10 (mean+/-SD). The dose recommended for phase II studies is 30 mg/m2 per day administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Single-agent capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is well documented in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients (overall response rate: 25%). However, its efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) has not been determined. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and to identify the side-effects of capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer showing progression despite 5-FU/LV-based combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

Fifty-one metastatic colorectal cancer patients who showed progressive disease in 5-FU/LV-containing regimens (median: two regimes) were treated with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily (days 1-14 repeated every 3 weeks).

RESULTS

Only one partial response was observed (response rate: 2%). Twenty-seven patients (53%) showed stable disease after two cycles. The median time to disease progression of either a partial response or stable disease was 3.4 months. Hand-foot syndrome was the main toxicity of capecitabine and occurred in 35% of cases (grade 3 or 4 in 6%). The median number of cycles administered was two and the relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 80%.

CONCLUSION

The response rate to capecitabine was low in metastatic colorectal cancers that were refractory to 5-FU/LV-containing chemotherapy. However, disease stabilization was seen in a significant number of patients.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Intravenous to Oral Administration

This article reviews the current status of the topoisomerase I (top I) inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. We focus on oral drug administration, the mode of administration that is generally preferred by patients with cancer. However, the great majority of the studies have been performed with intravenous (I.V.) administration. The most extensively investigated GI malignancy in phase I/II studies is colorectal cancer (CRC), for which I.V. irinotecan is currently approved in the United States and Europe. We discuss the activity and efficacy of irinotecan as a single agent in CRC and in combination regimens. Also, results obtained with monotherapy and in combination treatment in other GI malignancies such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer are discussed. Few phase I studies have been performed with oral irinotecan and its clinical activity has not yet been fully determined. Several top I inhibitors are discussed, including topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, rubitecan, exatecan, and lurtotecan. None of these agents, given orally or intravenously, have shown activity in CRC similar to that of I.V. irinotecan. However, several agents show promising results in other GI malignancies, eg, rubitecan and exatecan in pancreatic cancer. A complicating factor in the oral administration of the top I inhibitors is the often encountered low and variable oral bioavailability. This can partly be explained by the high affinity for the drug efflux pumps BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein, which are highly expressed in the epithelial apical membrane of the GI tract. A novel approach to improve the oral bioavailability of the top I inhibitors by temporary blockade of the drug transporter BCRP is described.

Phase II study of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in relapsed or metastatic colorectal cancer as first-line therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with relapsed or metastatic colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2002 and May 2004, 24 patients with histologically confirmed relapsed or metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. One chemotherapy cycle consisted of irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15; 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus IV with 600 mg/m(2) by a 22 hour intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, 15 and 16; and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2, 15 and 16, every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The median age of the 24 was 57.5 years (range, 38 approximately 69). Their metastatic sites included: the liver (62.5%), lung (20.8%), peritoneum (16.7%), lymph node (12.5%), ovary (8.3%) and pelvis/vagina (8.3%). Twenty-two patients were evaluable for a response. Six and 7 patients achieved partial responses and stable diseases, respectively. The overall response rate was 27.3% (95% Confidence interval; 10.3 approximately 44.5%). The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 14.7 months (range, 1.7 approximately 26.5). Median overall survival (OS) and 1-year OS rates were 19 months and 86.3%, respectively. Median response duration and median progression free survival were 7.47 and 5.57 months, respectively. A total of 83 cycles (median 4 cycles) were administered. The main non-hematologic toxicities were nausea/vomiting (44.5%/18.1%) and diarrhea (8.4%). The most common hematologic toxicity was NCI grade I/II anemia (31.3%) and grade I/II neutropenia was 10.8%. There was no life-threatening toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The results suggested that irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin combination chemotherapy in a biweekly schedule is a practical and tolerable treatment option in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

This multicentre phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan when combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid according to the Mayo Clinic schedule and to evaluate the activity of this combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients received irinotecan (250 or 300 mg/m2, 30- to 90-minute intravenous infusion on day 1), immediately followed by folinic acid (20 mg/m2/day) and 5-fluorouracil (425 mg/m2, 15-minute bolus infusion) days 1 to 5, every four weeks.

RESULTS

Diarrhoea was dose limiting at 300 mg/m2 irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid, and this was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the most frequently reported toxicity. The recommended dose of irinotecan for the phase II part of the study was 250 mg/m2. The response rate for the evaluable patient population was 36% (13/36), and 44% (16 patients) had stable disease (including 19% of minor response). For the intention-to-treat population, the response rate was 29% (14/49) and 35% (17 patients) stable disease (including 14% of minor response). The median time to progression was 7.0 months and the median survival was 12.0 months. Grade 3-4 non-haematological drug-related toxicities included delayed diarrhoea, stomatitis, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting. There were three deaths due to septic shock that were possibly or probably treatment-related.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen of irinotecan in combination with the Mayo Clinic schedule of bolus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid every four weeks showed activity as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. In keeping with other published results of studies using bolus 5-fluorouracil combined with irinotecan, the use of this regimen is limited by a relatively high rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia, and the combination of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil / folinic acid should remain the regimen of first choice.

Prospective multicenter phase II study of irinotecan as third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and progression after bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil

Irinotecan has proven anti-tumor activity as induction treatment in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or as second-line treatment after 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the present phase II study was to evaluate irinotecan as third-line chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer after sequential treatment with bolus 5-FU followed by an infusional 5-FU regimen. Patients pretreated with bolus 5-FU/folinic acid and the infusional 5-FU/folinic acid regimen were treated with 350 mg/m irinotecan i.v. once every 3 weeks in a multicenter phase II study. Tumor size was measured every cycle and treatment with irinotecan was continued until the occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 50 pretreated patients were included. Of the 45 evaluable patients, 13.3% [n=6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1-26.8] attained a response (complete/partial response) to treatment lasting 5.6 months (95% CI 4.2-6.3) and in four patients response has been confirmed (8.9%, 95% CI 2.5-21.2). Disease stabilization was noted in 51.1% of the patients (n=23, 95% CI 35.8-66.3). The median duration of response/disease stabilization was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2-6.0). Median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% CI 6.1-11.1), corresponding to a calculated 1-year survival of 28.3% (95% CI 15.2-41.3). Severe neutropenia occurred in 14% (n=7) and anemia grade III in 6% of the patients (n=3). The most frequent non-hematological toxicity grade III/IV related to treatment was diarrhea in 24% of the patients (n=12), followed by vomiting in 8% (n=4) and constipation as well as infection in two patients each (4%) (evaluable n=50). We conclude single-agent irinotecan is an effective and well-tolerable treatment in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of bolus and infusional 5-FU/folinic acid regimens. Elderly patients had the same probability to respond.

Survie à long terme des cancers colorectaux métastatiques sous chimiothérapie par 5-fluoro-uracile

PURPOSE

Median survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) is between 12 and 18 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term survival in this disease.

METHODS

We report here, retrospectively, the survival of 445 patients who entered in first-line prospective studies with LV-5FU-based regimen chemotherapy, between 1985 and 1995.

RESULTS

Median survival was 18 months. The 3, 5 and 10 year survival were respectively 17.9%, 4.5% and 2.4%. Seventy-five patients survived more than 3 years, among them, 10 achieved a complete and 34 a partial response, 12 had curative liver or lung surgery. Fifteen patients lived more than 5 years, 2 achieved a complete and 7 a partial response. Seven had curative surgery. Eleven patients were still alive in 2002, among them 7 in complete remission at 5 years, including 3 who did not have surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that some patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can achieve long survival, especially when secondary curative surgery can be performed. However, 1% of the patients can be cured with LV-5FU chemotherapy alone. These results will be probably improve with the use of the new drugs: oxaliplatin and irinotecan.

Protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil plus high-dose folinic acid combined with bolus mitomycin C in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a phase I/II dose escalation study

The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bolus mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with 24 h-continuous infusion of 5-flourouracil (FU) plus folinic acid, and to assess the toxicity and activity in patients with previously treated colorectal and gastric cancer. Escalating doses of MMC starting from 6 mg m(-2) in 2 mg m(-2)-steps to a maximum of 10 mg m(-2) were applied on days 1 and 22, given to fixed doses of 5-FU (2.600 mg m(-2)) as 24 h infusion and folinic acid 500 mg m(-2) prior to 5-FU weekly for 6 weeks. At least three patients were treated at each dose level. A total of 16 patients have been included in the phase I study. At the highest dose level (MMC 10 mg m(-2)), grade III thrombocytopenia, dyspnoea, mucositis and diarrhoea were observed in one patient each (17 %). In the phase II study 45 patients, 33 with colorectal cancer and 12 with gastric cancer, 23 patients after failure of first- and 22 patients after at least second-line or subsequent chemotherapy have been treated. Seven partial responses (PR) were registered (16%), one (3%; CI(95%), 0-16) in colorectal and six (50%; CI(95%), 21-79%) in gastric cancer patients. In all, 17 (38%) achieved disease stabilisation, 15 colorectal (45%, CI(95%), 28-64%) and two gastric cancer patients (17%; CI(95%), 2-48%). The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (range, 0.9-9.1) in colorectal and 4.6 months (range, 0.7-12.4) in gastric cancer. The median overall survival time was 6.6 months (range, 1.9-15.6) in colorectal and 7.1 months (range, 1.7-20.8) in patients with gastric cancer. This regimen was considered to be safe and well tolerated for pretreated patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma. In gastric cancer,MMC plus infusional 5-FU/folinic acid may be a potential second-line regimen with promising antitumour activity.

A Multicenter Phase II Study of Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated with 5-Fluorouracil

This multicenter, open-label, phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan 350 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The study enrolled 115 patients and a total of 558 cycles (median, 6 per patient) were administered. The overall objective response rate on an intent-to-treat basis was 18% (with 1 complete response and 20 partial responses), whereas 42 patients (37%) showed stable disease. Median time to progression was 4.8 months and median survival was 13.6 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities included delayed diarrhea (19.1%), nausea/vomiting (10.4%), and neutropenia (8.7%). There were 2 toxic deaths, 1 from delayed diarrhea and 1 from hemorrhage and grade 4 mucositis. In conclusion, the present study confirms the antitumor efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy in patients with CRC pretreated with 5-FU.

Synthesis of linear, beta-cyclodextrin-based polymers and their camptothecin conjugates

6(A),6(D)-Bis-(2-amino-2-carboxylethylthio)-6(A),6(D)-dideoxy-beta-cyclodextrin 1, a diamino acid derivative of beta-cyclodextrin, is synthesized and condensed with difunctionalized PEG comonomers to give linear, high molecular weight (M(w) over 50 kDa) beta-cyclodextrin-based polymers (2-4) with pendant functionality (carboxylate). 2-4 are all highly soluble in aqueous solutions (over 200 mg/mL). 20-O-trifluoroglycinylcamptothecin, 5a, and 20-O-trifluoroglycinylglycinylglycinylcamptothecin, 5b, are synthesized and conjugated to 2 to give polymer-camptothecin (CPT) prodrugs. The solubility of CPT is increased by more than three orders of magnitude when it is conjugated to 2. The rates of CPT release from the conjugates HGGG6 (high molecular weight polymer (M(w) 97 kDa), glyglygly linker and 6 wt % CPT loading) and HG6 (high MW polymer (M(w) 97 kDa), gly linker and 6 wt % CPT loading) in either mouse or human plasma are dramatically accelerated over the rates of pure hydrolysis at pH = 7.4, indicating the presence of enzymatic cleavage as a rate-determining step at this pH in the release of the CPT. The pH of aqueous solution has a large effect on hydrolysis rate of CPT from HGGG6 and HG6; the lower the pH, the slower the rate in the range at 4.1 <or= pH <or= 13.1. The IC(50)'s of polymer 2e, CPT, and the CPT conjugates HG6 and HGGG6 are found to be cell-line dependent with LS174T, HT29, A2780, and PC3 cells using in vitro MTT assays. The parent polymer 2e has very low toxicity to all cultured cells tested.

5-fluorouracil as a protracted continuous infusion plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens as first line

We carried out a single-center series with the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion as second-line chemotherapy for patients previously treated with a single-agent fluoropyrimidine as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin. Twenty-five patients diagnosed with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) received CPT-11 300 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day as a protracted infusion. Results were as follows. Twenty-four of 25 patients were evaluable for response. Two patients achieved a complete response and five a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 28%. Disease stabilization was obtained in 10 patients (40%), resulting in a tumor growth control rate of 68% (17 patients) and disease progression in seven (28%). Median progression-free interval was 6 months and median overall survival was 12 months. Neutropenia and diarrhea appeared as the most frequent adverse events, being grade 3/4 in 12 and 16% of patients, respectively. Mucositis, emesis, and hand and foot syndrome were mild. We conclude that protracted 5-FU infusion plus CPT-11 is an active and safe regimen for patients with advanced CRC. A phase III trial comparing this schedule with conventional CPT-11 monotherapy is warranted.

Multicenter phase II trial evaluating a three-weekly schedule of irinotecan plus raltitrexed in patients with 5-fluorouracil-refractory advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (CPT-11) and raltitrexed are active against advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), act through different mechanisms, and have only partially overlapping toxicity profiles. Phase I studies have shown that single-agent full doses of both drugs can be safely combined. The aim of this multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination in patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory ACC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1999 and December 2000, 52 patients (31 males, 21 females) with a median age of 62 years (range 39-75) were included and received CPT-11 (350 mg/m(2) as a 60-min infusion) plus raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2) as a 15-min infusion, 1 h after CPT-11), with courses repeated every 21 days. Objective response was assessed after every three courses, and treatment maintained until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 313 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles per patient (range 1-14). Seven patients (13.5%) achieved a partial response and one a complete response (1.9%), for an overall intention-to-treat response rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval 6.1% to 27.2%). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity was 23.1% for diarrhea, 21.2% for asthenia, 17.3% for neutropenia, 13.4% for emesis and 7.7% for infection. There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 20 months, median survival was 11.9 months and median time to progression was 4.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CPT-11 plus raltitrexed is active in patients with 5-FU-refractory ACC, at the expense of moderate toxicity.

A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Three different therapeutic regimens of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) were evaluated for efficacy and safety in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously either: CPT-11 125 mg/m(2), FA 20 mg/m(2) followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen); or CPT-11 180 mg/m(2) day 1 then FA 200 mg/m(2) over 2 h and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (arm B, Douillard regimen); or CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 43) alternating with FA 20 mg/m(2)/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day during 5 days (days 22-26) (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen).

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were included in the study (arm A, 51 patients; arm B, 53; arm C, 50). Overall response rates for the intention-to-treat populations were 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 48%], 42% (95% CI 28% to 56%) and 30% (95% CI 18% to 45%) for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median times to progression were 6, 8 and 7 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median survival times were 15, 12 and 17 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Overall response rates for the evaluable patient populations were 40% (95% CI 24% to 58%) in arm A, 44% (95% CI 29% to 60%) in arm B and 31% (95% CI 17% to 47%) in arm C. Neutropenia was the main serious adverse event in arms A (30% of patients) and C (22% of patients) but occurred in only 8% of patients in arm B. Delayed diarrhea was the main severe adverse event for the three regimens, from 15% to 22%.

CONCLUSION

All three regimens were highly active. The biweekly combination of CPT-11 and 5-FU/FA (arm B) was notable for its low incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3/4 delayed diarrhea was equivalent for the three treatment arms.

Phase II study of irinotecan and mitomycin C in 5-fluorouracil-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal and gastric cancer

The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the tolerance and efficacy of a second-line irinotecan/mitomycin C combination in patients with advanced gastric or colorectal cancer, pretreated with 5-fluorouracil. Forty patients who had received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for advanced disease or adjuvant 5-fluorouracil treatment were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan 125 mg/m2 and mitomycin C 5 mg/m2, given every 2 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression or limiting toxicity occurred. Five partial responses (12.5%), 22 cases of stable disease (55%) and 13 of progression (32.5%) were registered, giving an overall response rate of 12.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2-26.8%] and an overall control of tumor growth in 67.5% (95% CI, 50.8-81.4%) of patients. Median progression-free survival was 5 months, median survival time 8 months, and 1-year probability of survival was 21.6%. Diarrhea and neutropenia affected 25% and 12.5% of patients respectively, with only 7.5% experiencing grade 3-4 toxicity. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths or hospitalizations. This combination regimen was shown to be moderately effective with substantially lower toxicity than irinotecan monotherapy in 5-fluorouracil-pretreated patients with advanced gastric or colorectal cancer. It may represent an attractive option in patients at high risk for developing specific irinotecan toxicity.

Irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in patients pretreated with Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: a study to determine recommendable therapeutic dosage

Because no consensus exists regarding recommendable dose levels for irinotecan, an intrapatient dose escalation phase I-II study was initiated in previously treated patients with colorectal cancer. Survival was a secondary endpoint. Thirty-five consecutive patients with progressive disease after 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy were enrolled to receive irinotecan starting from 250 mg/m2/3 weeks and rising to currently used therapeutic doses. In total, 162 cycles were administered. The median tolerable dose was 250 mg/m2. Twelve patients (34%) were unable to tolerate doses greater than 250 mg/m2, 10 patients (28%) presented toxicity at 250 mg/m2 and 2 patients tolerated only 200 mg/m2. Three patients (9%) had partial response. The major adverse reactions were grade III-IV diarrhea, grade II-III nausea/vomiting, grade II-III neutropenia, and grade II-III anaemia in 28%, 48%, 11%, and 17% of the patients, respectively. Median survival time and time to progression were 8 and 3 months, respectively. The current irinotecan dose of 350 mg/m2/3 weeks appears unacceptably toxic and, hence, a lower dose needs to be considered. The response rates obtained are similar to the results observed in phase III studies, and its activity appears not to be adversely affected with this treatment scheme.