Guidelines for anti-emetic therapy: acute emesis

This CE is published through an unrestricted educational grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb

Credit

This lesson is good for 0.2 CE units, with a passing grade of 70%.

Goal

The goal of this program is to inform the participant of costeffective ways to prevent, identify, and manage nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic agents.

Objectives

At the completion of this program the participant will be able to: 1. List antineoplastic agents associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting. 2. Identify patient-specific risk factors for developing chemotherapyinduced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and how these factors may influence treatment of this syndrome. 3. Compare the three major types of CINV, including the pathophysiologic mechanism, time of onset, and symptom duration of each type. 4. Explain the mechanism of action and appropriate place in therapy for each type of antiemetic agent. 5. Differentiate between pharmacologic regimens for the prevention and treatment of CINV in adults. 6. Identify drug-specific factors that must be considered in developing a formulary management strategy for the antiemetic agents. 7. Describe specific information that the pharmacist can share with patients to help them understand and manage CINV.

Concise review of the management of iatrogenic emesis using cannabinoids: emphasis on nabilone for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a prevalent, distressing, and burdensome side effect of cancer chemotherapy. It is estimated to affect the majority of patients receiving certain anti-cancer drug regimens and can be treatment-limiting, even for life-saving medications. Despite seemingly numerous options, such as antimuscarinic anticholinergics, antihistamines, 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists, preventative therapies are often inadequately effective, particularly for "delayed CINV"-leaving an important unmet clinical need. Cannabinoid receptor agonists, by virtue of their unique mechanism of action and efficacy and safety data reported in clinical trials, appear to offer a useful additional option. The mechanistic value of cannabinoids has been well known for many years, but these agents may have been underutilized in the past because of the notoriety and legal status of marijuana. While botanical marijuana contains nearly 500 components, including the psychoactive tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), nabilone is an established, single-entity synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist that has become the focus of renewed interest. We review the basic pharmacology and clinical trial data of nabilone for use in prophylaxis and treatment of CINV.

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial of the impact on quality of life of continuing dexamethasone beyond 24 h following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Uncertainty remains about the optimal anti-emetic regimen for control of delayed nausea and vomiting after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Many patients receive dexamethasone but complain of insomnia, anxiety/agitation, and indigestion. The aim was to determine if patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer prefer treatment with dexamethasone or placebo for prophylaxis against delayed nausea and vomiting, and to compare quality of life (QOL) between the two treatments. In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, we compared oral dexamethasone (4 mg twice daily for 2 days) versus placebo for chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer. All patients received intravenous granisetron and dexamethasone pre-chemotherapy and oral granisetron on day 2. Primary endpoints were: (i) patient preference; (ii) difference between cycles in change of QOL from days 1 to 8. Median age of the 94 women was 51 years (range 27-76): 79 received fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and 15 received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. Thirteen withdrew pre-cycle 2 with no differences between arms. Of 80 patients stating a preference, 31 preferred placebo (39 %, 95 % CI: 28-50 %) and 37 (46 %, 95 % CI: 35-58 %) preferred dexamethasone; 12 had no preference. There were no differences in intensity of vomiting, nausea, or time to onset of vomiting. There was greater decrease in global QOL (p = 0.06) when patients received dexamethasone. No other symptom/QOL domains differed significantly. In conclusion, no significant difference was found in patient preference, QOL, or symptoms regardless of whether dexamethasone or placebo was used after adjuvant chemotherapy.

Opportunities for the replacement of animals in the study of nausea and vomiting

Nausea and vomiting are among the most common symptoms encountered in medicine as either symptoms of disease or side effects of treatments. Developing novel anti-emetics and identifying emetic liability in novel chemical entities rely on models that can recreate the complexity of these multi-system reflexes. Animal models (especially the ferret and dog) are the current gold standard; however, the selection of appropriate models is still a matter of debate, especially when studying the subjective human sensation of nausea. Furthermore, these studies are associated with animal suffering. Here, following a recent workshop held to review the utility of animal models in nausea and vomiting research, we discuss the limitations of some of the current models in the context of basic research, anti-emetic development and emetic liability detection. We provide suggestions for how these limitations may be overcome using non-animal alternatives, including greater use of human volunteers, in silico and in vitro techniques and lower organisms.

Glucocorticoids inhibit cell death in ovarian cancer and up-regulate caspase inhibitor cIAP2

PURPOSE

Almost all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receive chemotherapy and, concurrently, the synthetic steroid hormone dexamethasone to alleviate the side effects. This study aims to test the impact of steroid hormones on the apoptosis of epithelial ovarian cancer cells and to identify its mediators.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor cell lines from 19 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were analyzed for glucocorticoid receptor, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor expression. Cells were incubated with corresponding steroid hormones at serum-equivalent doses in hormone-depleted medium. Apoptosis was induced by application of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand or staurosporine and determined by poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase cleavage and cell survival. Microarray with 8K cDNA chips including apoptosis-relevant genes was used to study genes regulated by glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

In cell culture, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in OV-MZ-30 and OV-MZ-31 cells was reduced after treatment with dexamethasone or cortisol, but not with estradiol, progesterone, or androstenedione. Microarray analysis revealed a 7-fold up-regulation of the caspase inhibitor cIAP2 by dexamethasone in OV-MZ-30 and OV-MZ-31 cells. cIAP2 up-regulation by glucocorticoids was confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis in OV-MZ-30, OV-MZ-31, OV-CAR3, and SK-OV-3 cells. Down-regulation of cIAP2 expression by small interfering RNA sensitized SK-OV-3 cells to apoptosis inducer staurosporine. Under clinical conditions, treatment with dexamethasone was associated with significant up-regulation of cIAP2 in the ascites cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of the glucocorticoid receptor in epithelial ovarian cancer cells caused an anti-apoptotic effect associated with the enhanced cellular expression level of cIAP2. Dexamethasone pretreatment of epithelial ovarian cancer patients receiving apoptosis-inducing chemotherapy raises questions about a negative effect on antitumor efficacy.

Palonosetron

Palonosetron is a potent and highly selective serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist that has been evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. black triangle Intravenously administered palonosetron has a linear pharmacokinetic profile, with a long terminal elimination half-life ( approximate, equals 40 hours) and moderate (62%) plasma protein binding. In two randomised, double-blind trials in 1132 cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg was more effective than intravenous ondansetron 32 mg in producing a complete response (no emesis, no use of rescue medication) during acute (0-24 hours) or delayed (24-120 hours) phases, and similar to intravenous dolasetron 100 mg in acute, but more effective in delayed phase. Palonosetron 0.75 mg was similar to ondansetron (acute and delayed phase) or dolasetron (acute phase), but more effective than dolasetron in delayed phase. In patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (n = 667), the complete response rates during acute and delayed phases with intravenous palonosetron (0.25 or 0.75 mg) were similar to those seen in intravenous ondansetron 32 mg recipients in a randomised, double-blind trial. Intravenous palonosetron was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with few adverse events being treatment related. Palonosetron had no significant effect on the corrected QT interval or laboratory parameters.

Dexamethasone has a central antiemetic mechanism in decerebrated cats

Dexamethasone is an effective antiemetic drug, but its mechanism of action is unclear. We designed this study to investigate the direct antiemetic action of dexamethasone in the medulla of cats. By using an oscillographic vomiting model, decerebrated cats received microinjections of dexamethasone 100 nL (1 microg, n = 7; 0.1 microg, n = 7) into the bilateral nuclei tractus solitarii, which led to a significant prolongation of the latency (1 microg, 6.4 +/- 1.1 min versus 28.2 +/- 4.9 min, P < 0.05; 0.1 microg, 6.7 +/- 1.1 min versus 27.1 +/- 5.0 min, P < 0.05) of the first emetic episode and significantly decreased the frequency of emetic episodes (1 microg, 2.7 +/- 0.8 versus 0.1 +/- 0.4, P < 0.05; 0.1 microg, 2.9 +/- 0.9 versus 0.3 +/- 0.5, P < 0.05) induced by xylazine. Pretreatment with mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, blocked the antiemetic effect of dexamethasone in the bilateral nuclei tractus solitarii. However, microinjection of dexamethasone into the unilateral nucleus tractus solitarius alone did not alter the latency of the first emetic episode or the frequency of emetic episodes induced by xylazine. Local application of dexamethasone into the area postrema had no effect on the latency of the first emetic episode or the frequency of emetic episodes induced by xylazine. These results suggest that dexamethasone exerts its central antiemetic action through an activation of the glucocorticoid receptors in the bilateral nuclei tractus solitarii in the medulla.

Prevention and management of prostate cancer chemotherapy complications

Prevention and management of the adverse effects of prostate cancer chemotherapy depend on skilled regimen selection, dose adjustment, use of supportive care strategies, and a thorough understanding of the patient- and regimen-related factors that determine the risk for toxicity. Urologists, radiation oncologists, and primary care providers can play an important role before chemotherapy is prescribed by judicious use of treatments that impair bone marrow and other vital organ function. The current role of chemotherapy in prostate cancer is palliative. Successful palliation depends on reducing cancer-related suffering without introducing treatment-related suffering. Thus prevention and management of toxicity is central to the success of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Basic treatment considerations: chemotherapy

Lung cancer represents a major global health problem, with more than a million deaths reported each year. Because there are no effective screening tools to date, diagnosis of the disease at an advanced stage is a common feature. Over the past 20 years, elegant strides have been made in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Several novel chemotherapy agents that are efficacious and possess favorable toxicity profiles have been developed recently. In addition to evaluating novel combinations, alternative schedules to improve toxicity profiles are subjects of clinical trials. Much work needs to be done, however, to improve the outcome for patients with lung cancer. Chemotherapy extends life and improves quality of life for patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Combined modality therapy with radiation and chemotherapy improves the outcome for patients with locally advanced NSCLC and is associated with a curative potential. Molecularly targeted therapies are under rigorous evaluation, although the initial results have been disappointing. In the upcoming years, we will learn effective means to incorporate molecularly targeted therapies to existing treatment paradigms in lung cancer.

Platinum drugs in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The use of chemotherapy is considered standard therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that cannot be treated with radiotherapy and in those with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status. This approach is also accepted in patients with earlier stage disease, when combined with radiotherapy in those with non-resectable locally advanced disease, or in the preoperative setting. Randomised clinical studies and meta-analyses of the literature have confirmed the beneficial survival effect of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin and carboplatin have been successfully used with other drugs in a wide variety of well-established two-drug combinations while three-drug combinations are still under investigation. Cisplatin and carboplatin use is limited by toxicity and inherent resistance. These considerations have prompted research into new platinum agents, such as the trinuclear platinum agent BBR3464, the platinum complex ZD0473 and oxaliplatin. These compounds could be developed in combination with agents such as paclitaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine in patients with advanced and/or refractory solid tumours.

Patient-tailored antiemetic treatment with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists according to cytochrome P-450 2D6 genotypes

PURPOSE

The use of serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists has substantially reduced, but not eliminated, nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy. This study sought to investigate whether efficacy of antiemetic treatment with ondansetron and tropisetron depends on cytochrome P-450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype, hypothesizing that the rapid and particularly the ultrarapid metabolizers of these drugs are at risk of being undertreated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Included in the study were 270 cancer patients receiving their first day of chemotherapy. Nausea and vomiting were documented using standardized interviews. The intensity of nausea was measured with visual analog scales before and twice during the chemotherapy. The relationship between the CYP2D6 genotypes and the tropisetron serum concentrations 3 and 6 hours after drug administration was analyzed in a subgroup of 42 patients. CYP2D6 genotyping was carried out by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

RESULTS

Genetically defined poor metabolizers had higher serum concentrations of tropisetron than all other patients (P <.03). Approximately 30% of all patients receiving chemotherapy experienced nausea and vomiting. Genetically defined ultrarapid meta-bolizers of CYP2D6 substrates had higher frequency of vomiting within the first 4 hours (P <.001) and within the period 5 to 24 hours (P <.03) after treatment than all the other patients; the tendency for nausea was similar. This difference was more pronounced in patients treated with tropisetron than in those treated with ondansetron.

CONCLUSION

Antiemetic treatment with tropisetron or ondansetron could be improved by adjustment for the CYP2D6 genotype; approximately 50 subjects would have to be genotyped to protect one patient from severe emesis.

Anti-emetics for cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis: Potential of alternative delivery systems

Currently, the most commonly used routes of administration of antiemetics in chemotherapeutic regimens are oral and intravenous. Patient compliance and thus efficacy of conventional drug schedules and formulations are often impaired by difficulties associated with oral or intravenous uptake of the administered chemotherapy. Alternative or new drug delivery systems should overcome these problems by improving patient compliance. Several new drug delivery systems are available and development of these new systems is ongoing, in particular to meet delivery requirements of modern biological therapeutics and the application of gene therapy. However, at the present time, the implementation of new techniques of alternative antiemetic drug administration for chemotherapy-induced emesis is very limited. The challenge for clinical investigations to further develop new delivery systems, in particular for antiemetic therapies, remains.

Prevention and Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting, Part 2

Credit

This lesson is good for 0.3 CE units, with a passing grade of 70%.

Goal

The goal of this program is to inform the participant about cost-effective ways to prevent, identify, and manage nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic agents.

Objectives

At the completion of this program the participant will be able to: 1. List antineoplastic agents associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting. 2. Identify patient-specific risk factors for developing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and how these factors may influence treatment of this syndrome. 3. Compare the three major types of CINV, including the pathophysiologic mechanism, time of onset, and symptom duration of each type. 4. Explain the mechanism of action and appropriate place in therapy for each type of antiemetic agent. 5. Differentiate between pharmacologic regimens for the prevention and treatment of CINV in adults. 6. Identify drug-specific factors that must be considered when developing a formulary management strategy for the antiemetic agents. 7. Describe specific information that the pharmacist can share with patients to help them understand and manage CINV.

Cancer-related symptoms

Patients with cancer experience multiple symptoms including pain, dyspnea, fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment. These symptoms impair patients' daily functioning and their quality of life. Symptoms that can be well managed are often undertreated. A major barrier to adequate symptom treatment is poor assessment. The use of simple measurement scales greatly improves the symptom assessment process, helps direct treatment choices, and provides information about the effectiveness of treatment. Recently, better methods for symptom assessment have been developed, including brief self-report tools for the assessment of multiple symptoms and interactive voice response systems for assessing symptoms at home. Symptom assessment can be linked to evidence-based or best practice guidelines to expedite optimal symptom treatment. Because patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy are seen in the clinic frequently, the radiation oncologist can play an integral role in a comprehensive approach that involves both the medical and radiotherapeutic treatment of cancer-related symptoms.

Tropisetron: an update of its use in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Tropisetron is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) antagonist that is primarily used in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Antagonism of 5-HT3 binding sites in the peripheral and central nervous system is the probable mechanism of prevention of acute nausea and vomiting. Effects on delayed nausea and vomiting are less well understood as these are probably not mediated solely by 5-HT3 receptors. Tropisetron monotherapy is effective for the control of acute, and to a lesser extent delayed, nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately to severely emetogenic chemotherapy. The combination of dexamethasone and tropisetron is more effective than monotherapy. Complete control of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting was obtained in 69 to 97% of patients receiving the combination compared with 46 to 80% receiving tropisetron monotherapy in randomised trials. There were generally no significant differences between the control of acute or delayed nausea and vomiting provided by tropisetron, ondansetron or granisetron in randomised, comparative trials. The antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron was maintained over multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Most comparative studies showed tropisetron monotherapy to be more effective than metoclopramide in controlling acute nausea and vomiting, with the exception of 1 study which showed similar efficacy. However, high dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone provided similar control of delayed emesis to tropisetron plus dexamethasone. Tropisetron is also effective in children, including those who responded poorly to previous antiemetic treatment. Tropisetron and ondansetron generally have similar efficacies in this population. The drug enhanced patients' quality of life and was well tolerated by adults and children alike. The recommended oral and IV dosage of tropisetron is 5 mg once daily; there is no increase in efficacy with doses >5 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Tropisetron is similar to other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in both adults and children. It is suitable as first-line therapy (combined with a corticosteroid) for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting in patients treated with moderately to severely emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents. This combination is also moderately effective in the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting.