Admissions for critically ill children: where and why?

Variation in hospital admission in febrile children evaluated at the Emergency Department (ED) in Europe: PERFORM, a multicentre prospective observational study

Objectives

Hospitalisation is frequently used as a marker of disease severity in observational Emergency Department (ED) studies. The comparison of ED admission rates is complex in potentially being influenced by the characteristics of the region, ED, physician and patient. We aimed to study variation in ED admission rates of febrile children, to assess whether variation could be explained by disease severity and to identify patient groups with large variation, in order to use this to reduce unnecessary health care utilization that is often due to practice variation.

Design

MOFICHE (Management and Outcome of Fever in children in Europe, part of the PERFORM study, www.perform2020.org), is a prospective cohort study using routinely collected data on febrile children regarding patient characteristics (age, referral, vital signs and clinical alarming signs), diagnostic tests, therapy, diagnosis and hospital admission.

Setting and participants

Data were collected on febrile children aged 0–18 years presenting to 12 European EDs (2017–2018).

Main outcome measures

We compared admission rates between EDs by using standardised admission rates after adjusting for patient characteristics and initiated tests at the ED, where standardised rates >1 demonstrate higher admission rates than expected and rates <1 indicate lower rates than expected based on the ED patient population.

Results

We included 38,120 children. Of those, 9.695 (25.4%) were admitted to a general ward (range EDs 5.1–54.5%). Adjusted standardised admission rates ranged between 0.6 and 1.5. The largest variation was seen in short admission rates (0.1–5.0), PICU admission rates (0.2–2.2), upper respiratory tract infections (0.4–1.7) and fever without focus (0.5–2.7). Variation was small in sepsis/meningitis (0.9–1.1).

Conclusions

Large variation exists in admission rates of febrile children evaluated at European EDs, however, this variation is largely reduced after correcting for patient characteristics and therefore overall admission rates seem to adequately reflect disease severity or a potential for a severe disease course. However, for certain patient groups variation remains high even after adjusting for patient characteristics.

Pediatric admissions that include intensive care: a population-based study

Background

Pediatric admissions to intensive care outside children’s hospitals are generally excluded from registry-based studies. This study compares pediatric admission to specialist pediatric intensive care units (PICU) with pediatric admissions to intensive care units (ICU) in general hospitals in an Australian population.

Methods

We undertook a population-based record linkage cohort study utilizing longitudinally-linked hospital and death data for pediatric hospitalization from New South Wales, Australia, 2010–2013. The study population included all new pediatric, post-neonatal hospital admissions that included time in ICU (excluding neonatal ICU).

Results

Of 498,466 pediatric hospitalizations, 7525 (1.5%) included time in an intensive care unit – 93.7% to PICU and 6.3% to ICU in a general (non-PICU) hospital. Non-PICU admissions were of older children, in rural areas, with shorter stays in ICU, more likely admitted for acute conditions such as asthma, injury or diabetes, and less likely to have chronic conditions, receive continuous ventilatory support, blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition or die.

Conclusions

A substantial proportion of children are admitted to ICUs in general hospitals. A comprehensive overview of pediatric ICU admissions includes these admissions and the context of the total hospitalization.

Current State of Pediatric Intensive Care and High Dependency Care in Nepal

OBJECTIVES

To describe the state of pediatric intensive care and high dependency care in Nepal. Pediatric intensive care is now a recognized specialty in high-income nations, but there are few reports from low-income countries. With the large number of critically ill children in Nepal, the importance of pediatric intensive care is increasingly recognized but little is known about its current state.

DESIGN

Survey.

SETTING

All hospitals in Nepal that have separate physical facilities for PICU and high dependency care.

PATIENTS

All children admitted to these facilities.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A questionnaire survey was sent to the chief of each facility. Eighteen hospitals were eligible and 16 responded. Two thirds of the 16 units were established in the last 5 years; they had a total of 93 beds, with median of 5 (range, 2-10) beds per unit. All 16 units had a monitor for each bed but only 75% could manage central venous catheters and only 75% had a blood gas analyzer. Thirty two percent had only one functioning mechanical ventilator and another 38% had two ventilators, the other units had 3-6 ventilators. Six PICUs (38%) had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:2 and the others had 1:3 to 1:6. Only one institution had a pediatric intensive care specialist. The majority of patients (88%) came from families with an income of just over a dollar per day. All patients were self funded with a median cost of PICU bed being $25 U.S. dollars (interquartile range, 15-31) per day. The median stay was 6 (interquartile range, 4.8-7) days. The most common age group was 1-5. Sixty percent of units reported respiratory distress/failure as their primary cause for admission. Mortality was 25% (interquartile range, 20-35%) with mechanical ventilation and 1% (interquartile range, 0-5%) without mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric intensive care in Nepal is still in its infancy, and there is a need for improved organization, services, and training.

A National Survey of Pediatric Intensive Care Units in Pakistan

Purpose. To describe the structure, staffing resources, equipment, academic activities, and characteristics of pediatric population of pediatric intensive care units across the country. Material & Method. This was a prospective, descriptive, and observational survey of pediatric intensive care units from January to December 2009 across Pakistan. A questionnaire survey was emailed to director of each unit. Results. 16 PICUs were participated in this survey (100% response rate). A total of units with 155 beds were identified (1.1 bed /500,000 children). Regarding the categories, 12 (75%) were medical, 3 (19%) were pure cardiac intensive care units, and one unit (6%) was combined multidisciplinary cardiothoracic unit. 13 (81%) units were in public sector as compared to 3 (19%) were in private sector. The mean unit size was 9.7 (range 4–28) beds. Twelve (75%) units were located in three large cities. Only 3 (19%) units have trained intensivist. 37% (6/16) had nurse to patient ratio of 1 : 1-1 : 2 while others had ratios of 1 : 3–1 : 5 with all nurses specialized trained for pediatric intensive care units with bachelor degree or diploma in nursing. Only 50% had capacity for invasive monitoring. Conclusion. We found inadequacies in several aspects of PICUs in Pakistan including fewer PICUs, inadequate PICU beds, and lack of trained personal to look after critically ill pediatric population.

Quantifying high dependency care: a prospective cohort study in Yorkshire (UK)

High dependency care (HDC) is a level of care situated between intensive care and usual ward care with its delivery being independent of location. Inadequate definition makes it problematic to determine the number of children receiving HDC, to identify their care setting and therefore to undertake service planning. We aimed to estimate the volume of hospital inpatient HDC in a geographically defined population using a customised measurement tool in four types of paediatric hospital services (1) tertiary specialist wards, (2) tertiary paediatric intensive care units, (3) district general hospitals (DGHs) general wards and (4) wards at a major acute general hospital. A region-wide prospective cohort study during 2005 collected data to develop a 36-item HDC measurement tool, which then identified children receiving HDC by day and night. The cohort identified 1,763 children as receiving HDC during an admission to 1 of 36 hospital wards in 14 hospitals. HDC was delivered during 9,077 shift periods of 12 h or 4,538 bed days. The volume of care and patient profiles varied by hospital type, within hospital by ward type and by age and season. Tertiary specialist wards and ICUs provided 72% of HDC, with the remainder delivered at the DGHs and the major acute general hospital. The volume of admissions to tertiary specialist wards showed little seasonality and children tended to be older (26% were aged 10-15 years). By comparison, admissions to DGHs were younger with an excess during the winter months. This is the first UK study to quantify HDC from empirical data encompassing all hospital and ward types within a large clinical network. A lack of HDC-designated beds across the region resulted in HDC delivery on all types of hospital wards. The study size and representativeness makes the estimated number of HDC bed days per head of population likely to reflect the wider UK population.