1-Phenylpyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines; structure-ac:tivity relationships for C6 substituents at A1 and A2A adenosine receptors

History and perspectives of A2A adenosine receptor antagonists as potential therapeutic agents

Growing evidence emphasizes that the purine nucleoside adenosine plays an active role as a local regulator in different pathologies. Adenosine is a ubiquitous nucleoside involved in various physiological and pathological functions by stimulating A1 , A2A , A2B , and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). At the present time, the role of A2A ARs is well known in physiological conditions and in a variety of pathologies, including inflammatory tissue damage and neurodegenerative disorders. In particular, the use of selective A2A antagonists has been reported to be potentially useful in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). In this review, A2A AR signal transduction pathways, together with an analysis of the structure-activity relationships of A2A antagonists, and their corresponding pharmacological roles and therapeutic potential have been presented. The initial results from an emerging polypharmacological approach are also analyzed. This approach is based on the optimization of the affinity and/or functional activity of the examined compounds toward multiple targets, such as A1 /A2A ARs and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B), both closely implicated in the pathogenesis of PD.

Recent developments in adenosine A2A receptor ligands

The development of potent and selective agonists and antagonists of adenosine receptors (ARs) has been a target of medicinal chemistry research for several decades, and recently the US Food and Drug Administration has approved Lexiscan, an adenosine derivative substituted at the 2 position, for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Currently, some other adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)AR) agonists and antagonists are undergoing preclinical testing and clinical trials. While agonists are potent antiinflammatory agents also showing hypotensive effects, antagonists are being developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.However, since there are still major problems in this field, including side effects, low brain penetration (for the targeting of CNS diseases), short half-life, or lack of in vivo effects, the design and development of new AR ligands is a hot research topic.This review presents an update on the medicinal chemistry of A(2A)AR agonists and antagonists, and stresses the strong need for more selective ligands at the human A(2A)AR subtype, in particular in the case of agonists.

Highlights on the development of A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists

Although significant progress has been made in the past few decades demonstrating that adenosine modulates a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes through the interaction with four subtypes of a family of cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors, clinical evaluation of some adenosine receptor ligands has been discontinued. Major problems include side effects due to the wide distribution of adenosine receptors, low brain penetration (which is important for the targeting of CNS diseases), short half-life of compounds, or a lack of effects, in some cases perhaps due to receptor desensitization or to low receptor density in the targeted tissue. Currently, three A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists have begun phase III studies. Two of them are therapeutically evaluated as pharmacologic stress agents and the third proved to be effective in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI), while avoiding the adverse effects of steroid agents. On the other hand, the great interest in the field of A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonists is related to their application in neurodegenerative disorders, in particular, Parkinson's disease, and some of them are currently in various stages of evaluation. This review presents an update of medicinal chemistry and molecular recognition of A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists, and stresses the strong need for more selective ligands at the A(2A) human subtype.

Search for new antagonist ligands for adenosine receptors from QSAR point of view. How close are we?

In view of the large libraries of nucleoside analogues that are now being handled in organic synthesis, the identification of drug biological activity is advisable prior to synthesis and this can be achieved by employing predictive biological property methods. In this sense, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) or docking approaches have emerged as promising tools. Although a large number of in silico approaches have been described in the literature for the prediction of different biological activities, the use of QSAR applications to develop adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists is not common as for the case of the antibiotics and anticancer compounds for instance. The intention of this review is to summarize the present knowledge concerning computational predictions of new molecules as adenosine receptor antagonists.

Progress in the pursuit of therapeutic adenosine receptor antagonists

Ever since the discovery of the hypotensive and bradycardiac effects of adenosine, adenosine receptors continue to represent promising drug targets. First, this is due to the fact that the receptors are expressed in a large variety of tissues. In particular, the actions of adenosine (or methylxanthine antagonists) in the central nervous system, in the circulation, on immune cells, and on other tissues can be beneficial in certain disorders. Second, there exists a large number of ligands, which have been generated by introducing several modifications in the structure of the lead compounds (adenosine and methylxanthine), some of them highly specific. Four adenosine receptor subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) have been cloned and pharmacologically characterized, all of which are G protein-coupled receptors. Adenosine receptors can be distinguished according to their preferred mechanism of signal transduction: A1 and A3 receptors interact with pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins of the Gi and Go family; the canonical signaling mechanism of the A2A and of the A2B receptors is stimulation of adenylyl cyclase via Gs proteins. In addition to the coupling to adenylyl cyclase, all four subtypes may positively couple to phospholipase C via different G protein subunits. The development of new ligands, in particular, potent and selective antagonists, for all subtypes of adenosine receptors has so far been directed by traditional medicinal chemistry. The availability of genetic information promises to facilitate understanding of the drug-receptor interaction leading to the rational design of a potentially therapeutically important class of drugs. Moreover, molecular modeling may further rationalize observed interactions between the receptors and their ligands. In this review, we will summarize the most relevant progress in developing new therapeutic adenosine receptor antagonists.

Synthesis and 3D QSAR of New Pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridines: Potent and Selective Inhibitors of A1 Adenosine Receptors

A number of 4-aminopyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridines 5-carboxylic acid esters (2-8) were synthesized and evaluated for their binding affinity at the A1, A2A, and A3 adenosine receptors (AR), in bovine cortical membranes, as well as for their affinity toward human A1AR (hA1AR). Some of the new compounds were characterized by a high affinity and selectivity toward the A1 receptor subtype, showing a significant improvement in comparison with other pyrazolo-pyridines previously reported in the literature. In particular the methyl ester 2h as well as the isopropyl ester 5h, both of them bearing a p-methoxyphenylethylamino side chain at the position 4, presented Ki values of 6 and 7 nM, respectively. To rationalize the relationships between structure and affinity of the novel compounds, a 3D QSAR model was also generated starting from compounds belonging to different classes of known A1AR antagonists.

Novel, Highly Potent Adenosine Deaminase Inhibitors Containing the Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine Ring System. Synthesis, Structure−Activity Relationships, and Molecular Modeling Studies

This study reports the synthesis of a number of 1- and 2-alkyl derivatives of the 4-aminopyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (APP) nucleus and their evaluation as inhibitors of ADA from bovine spleen. The 2-substituted aminopyrazolopyrimidines proved to be potent inhibitors, most of them exhibiting K(i) values in the nanomolar/subnanomolar range. In this series the inhibitory activity is enhanced with the increase in length of the alkyl chain, reaching a maximum with the n-decyl substituent. Insertion of a 2'-hydroxy group in the n-decyl chain gave 3k, whose (R)-isomer displayed the highest inhibitory potency of the series (K(i) 0.053 nM), showing an activity 2 orders of magnitude higher than that of (+)-EHNA (K(i) 1.14 nM), which was taken as the reference standard. Docking simulations of aminopyrazolopyrimidines into the ADA binding site were also performed, to rationalize the structure-activity relationships of this class of inhibitors.

2,4,6-trisubstituted pyrimidines as a new class of selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonists

Adenosine receptor antagonists usually possess a bi- or tricyclic heteroaromatic structure at their core with varying substitution patterns to achieve selectivity and/or greater affinity. Taking into account molecular modeling results from a series of potent adenosine A1 receptor antagonists, a pharmacophore was derived from which we show that a monocyclic core can be equally effective. To achieve a compound that may act at the CNS we propose imposing a restriction related to its polar surface area (PSA). In consequence, we have synthesized two novel series of pyrimidines, possessing good potency at the adenosine A1 receptor and desirable PSA values. In particular, compound 30 (LUF 5735) displays excellent A1 affinity (Ki = 4 nM) and selectivity (< or =50% displacement of 1 muM concentrations of the radioligand at the other three adenosine receptors) and has a PSA value of 53 A2.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 4-alkylamino-1-hydroxymethylimidazo[1,2-a]quinoxalines as adenosine A1 receptor antagonists

A series of 4-alkylamino-1-hydroxymethylimidazo[1,2-a]quinoxalines have been synthesized and evaluated for their adenosine A(1) receptor inhibitory activity in the radioligand binding assays. The compounds were tested for the inhibition percent (IP) and the affinity toward A(1)AR (K(i)) that IP were more than 90% in the nanomolar range. 4-Cyclopentylamino-7,8-dichloro-1-hydroxymethylimidazo[1,2-a]quinoxaline 18 is the most potent compound in this series, having K(i)=7nM, which is remarkably higher than that of IRFI-165 (K(i)=48). 1-Hydroxymethyl groups of the tricyclic heteroarmatic compounds displayed the potent affinities toward A(1)AR.

A TOPS-MODE approach to predict affinity for A1 adenosine receptors. 2-(Arylamino)adenosine analogues

The TOPological Sub-Structural Molecular Design (TOPS-MODE) approach has been applied to the study of the affinity of A(1) adenosine receptor of different 2-(arylamino)adenosine analogues. A model able to describe closed to 79% of the variance in the values for binding experiments of 32 analogues of these compounds through multilinear regression analysis (MRA) was developed with the use of the mentioned approach. In contrast, no one of seven different approaches, including the use of Constitutional, Topological, Molecular walk counts, BCUT, Randic Molecular profiles, Geometrical, and RDF descriptors was able to explain more than 70% of the variance in the mentioned property with the same number of descriptors. In addition, the TOPS-MODE approach permitted to find the contribution of different fragments to the biological property giving to the model a straightforward structural interpretability.

Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological activity of methyl and thiomethyl substituted pyrimidines as corticotropin releasing hormone type 1 antagonists

Four small, targeted libraries of differentially substituted amino pyrimidines were synthesized in moderate to good yields. Excellent regiochemistry was observed for substitution at C2/C4 with selectivity > 50:1 noted. All analogues were screened for their ability to interact with CRH1 and CRH2 receptors. In all instances only poor agonistic and/or antagonistic behaviour was noted at CRH2. However, several compounds were potent and selective CRH1 antagonists, most notably 13a Ki = 39 nM. Additionally we have utilized these data and that recently reported by others to refine our original CRH1 pharmacophore (J Med. Chem., 1999, 42, 2351-2357).