1
|
Zhang JJ, Fu H, Lin R, Zhou J, Haider A, Fang W, Elghazawy NH, Rong J, Chen J, Li Y, Ran C, Collier TL, Chen Z, Liang SH. Imaging Cholinergic Receptors in the Brain by Positron Emission Tomography. J Med Chem 2023; 66:10889-10916. [PMID: 37583063 PMCID: PMC10461233 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c00573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Cholinergic receptors represent a promising class of diagnostic and therapeutic targets due to their significant involvement in cognitive decline associated with neurological disorders and neurodegenerative diseases as well as cardiovascular impairment. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive molecular imaging tool that has helped to shed light on the roles these receptors play in disease development and their diverse functions throughout the central nervous system (CNS). In recent years, there has been a notable advancement in the development of PET probes targeting cholinergic receptors. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the recent progress in the development of these PET probes for cholinergic receptors with a specific focus on ligand structure, radiochemistry, and pharmacology as well as in vivo performance and applications in neuroimaging. The review covers the structural design, pharmacological properties, radiosynthesis approaches, and preclinical and clinical evaluations of current state-of-the-art PET probes for cholinergic receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Jing Zhang
- Jiangsu
Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest
Resources, Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab for the Chemistry and Utilization
of Agro-Forest Biomass, Jiangsu Key Lab of Biomass-Based Green Fuels
and Chemicals, International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals
and Materials, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China
| | - Hualong Fu
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Key
Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education, College
of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Ruofan Lin
- Jiangsu
Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest
Resources, Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab for the Chemistry and Utilization
of Agro-Forest Biomass, Jiangsu Key Lab of Biomass-Based Green Fuels
and Chemicals, International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals
and Materials, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China
| | - Jingyin Zhou
- Key
Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, Ministry of Education, College
of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Ahmed Haider
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Weiwei Fang
- Jiangsu
Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest
Resources, Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab for the Chemistry and Utilization
of Agro-Forest Biomass, Jiangsu Key Lab of Biomass-Based Green Fuels
and Chemicals, International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals
and Materials, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China
| | - Nehal H. Elghazawy
- Department
of Pharmaceutical, Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy & Biotechnology, German University in Cairo, 11835 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Jian Rong
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Jiahui Chen
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Yinlong Li
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Chongzhao Ran
- Athinoula
A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02114, United States
| | - Thomas L. Collier
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| | - Zhen Chen
- Jiangsu
Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest
Resources, Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab for the Chemistry and Utilization
of Agro-Forest Biomass, Jiangsu Key Lab of Biomass-Based Green Fuels
and Chemicals, International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals
and Materials, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
| | - Steven H. Liang
- Division
of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
& Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
- Department
of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory
University, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Myslivecek J. Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists. Front Physiol 2022; 13:974160. [PMID: 36148314 PMCID: PMC9486310 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.974160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) are typical members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and exist in five subtypes from M1 to M5. Muscarinic receptor subtypes do not sufficiently differ in affinity to orthosteric antagonists or agonists; therefore, the analysis of receptor subtypes is complicated, and misinterpretations can occur. Usually, when researchers mainly specialized in CNS and peripheral functions aim to study mAChR involvement in behavior, learning, spinal locomotor networks, biological rhythms, cardiovascular physiology, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal tract functions, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease, they use orthosteric ligands and they do not use allosteric ligands. Moreover, they usually rely on manufacturers’ claims that could be misleading. This review aimed to call the attention of researchers not deeply focused on mAChR pharmacology to this fact. Importantly, limited selective binding is not only a property of mAChRs but is a general attribute of most neurotransmitter receptors. In this review, we want to give an overview of the most common off-targets for established mAChR ligands. In this context, an important point is a mention the tremendous knowledge gap on off-targets for novel compounds compared to very well-established ligands. Therefore, we will summarize reported affinities and give an outline of strategies to investigate the subtype’s function, thereby avoiding ambiguous results. Despite that, the multitargeting nature of drugs acting also on mAChR could be an advantage when treating such diseases as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics are a perfect example of a multitargeting advantage in treatment. A promising strategy is the use of allosteric ligands, although some of these ligands have also been shown to exhibit limited selectivity. Another new direction in the development of muscarinic selective ligands is functionally selective and biased agonists. The possible selective ligands, usually allosteric, will also be listed. To overcome the limited selectivity of orthosteric ligands, the recommended process is to carefully examine the presence of respective subtypes in specific tissues via knockout studies, carefully apply “specific” agonists/antagonists at appropriate concentrations and then calculate the probability of a specific subtype involvement in specific functions. This could help interested researchers aiming to study the central nervous system functions mediated by the muscarinic receptor.
Collapse
|
7
|
Barroso S, Blay G, Cardona L, Fernández I, García B, Pedro JR. Highly Diastereoselective Arylation of (S)-Mandelic Acid Enolate: Enantioselective Synthesis of Substituted (R)-3-Hydroxy-3-phenyloxindoles and (R)-Benzylic Acids and Synthesis of Nitrobenzophenones. J Org Chem 2004; 69:6821-9. [PMID: 15387607 DOI: 10.1021/jo0402069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
An easy access to substituted (R)-3-hydroxy-3-phenyloxindoles, (R)-benzylic acids, and benzophenones is described. The reaction of the lithium enolate of the (2S,5S)-cis-1,3-dioxolan-4-one derived from optically active (S)-mandelic acid and pivalaldehyde with several o- and p-halonitrobenzenes proceeds readily to give the corresponding arylation products in good yields and diastereoselectivities. The reduction of the nitro group with Zn/HCl/EtOH in the o-nitro arylation products with concomitant intramolecular aminolysis of the dioxolanone moiety leads directly to enantiomerically pure (R)-3-hydroxy-3-phenyloxindoles. On the other hand the basic hydrolysis of the dioxolanone moiety in all the arylation products (ortho and para) leads to enantiomerically pure substituted (R)-benzylic acids. The oxidative decarboxylation of these latter with oxygen as terminal oxidant in the presence of pivalaldehyde and the Co(III)-Me2opba complex as catalyst gives substituted nitrobenzophenones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Barroso
- Departament de Química Orgànica, Facultat de Química, Universitat de València, Dr. Moliner 50, E-46100 Burjassot, València, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Skaddan MB, Jewett DM, Sherman PS, Kilbourn MR. (R)-N-[11C]methyl-3-pyrrolidyl benzilate, a high-affinity reversible radioligand for PET studies of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Synapse 2002; 45:31-7. [PMID: 12112411 DOI: 10.1002/syn.10079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
We recently reported the synthesis and binding affinity of ligands for the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) based on both the pyrrolidyl and piperidyl benzilate scaffold. One of these, (R)-3-pyrrolidyl benzilate, was successfully radiolabeled with [(11)C]methyl triflate and the resulting compound, (R)-N-[(11)C]methyl-3-pyrrolidyl benzilate (3-[(11)C]NMPYB), was evaluated as a reversible, acetylcholine-sensitive tracer for the mAChR (K(i) of unlabeled 3-NMPYB is 0.72 nM). This compound displayed high, receptor-mediated retention in regions of the mouse and rat brain known to have high concentrations of mAChRs. Moreover, bolus studies in a pigtail monkey showed that this compound had superior clearance from the brain when compared to muscarinic radiotracers previously employed in human PET studies. Infusion studies in the same monkey revealed that it was possible to achieve equilibrium of radiotracer distribution for 3-[(11)C]NMPYB in both the striatum and cortex. Sensitivity to endogenous acetylcholine levels was evaluated by injecting phenserine (5 mg/kg) into rats prior to administration of 3-[(11)C]NMPYB in an equilibrium infusion protocol. This pretreatment produced a modest, statistically significant decrease (9-11%) in the distribution volume ratios for muscarinic receptor rich regions of the rat brain as compared to controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc B Skaddan
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0552, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Magata Y, Lang L, Kiesewetter DO, Jagoda EM, Channing MA, Eckelman WC. Biologically stable [(18)F]-labeled benzylfluoride derivatives. Nucl Med Biol 2000; 27:163-8. [PMID: 10773545 DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(99)00108-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Use of the [(18)F]-fluoromethyl phenyl group is an attractive alternative to direct fluorination of phenyl groups because the fluorination of the methyl group takes place under milder reaction conditions. However, we have found that 4-FMeBWAY showed femur uptake equal to that of fluoride up to 30 min in rat whereas 4-FMeQNB had a significantly lower percent injected dose per gram in femur up to 120 min. For these and other benzylfluoride derivatives, there was no clear in vivo structure-defluorination relationship. Because benzylchlorides (BzCls) are known alkylating agents, benzylfluorides may be alkylating agents as well, which may be the mechanism of defluorination. On this basis, the effects of substitution on chemical stability were evaluated by the 4-(4-nitro-benzyl)-pyridine (NBP) test, which is used to estimate alkylating activity with NBP. The effect of substitution on the alkylating activity was evaluated for nine BzCl derivatives: BzCl; 3- or 4-methoxy (electron donation) substituted BzCl; 2-, 3-, or 4-nitro (electron withdrawing) substituted BzCl; and 2-, 3-, or 4-chloro (electron withdrawing) substituted BzCl. Taken together, the alkylating reactivity of 3-chloro-BzCl was the weakest. This result was then applied to [(18)F]-benzylfluoride derivatives and in vivo and in vitro stability were evaluated. Consequently, 3-chloro-[(18)F]-benzylfluoride showed a 70-80% decrease of defluorination in both experiments in comparison with [(18)F]-benzylfluoride, as expected. Moreover, a good linear relationship between in vivo femur uptake and in vitro hepatocyte metabolism was observed with seven (18)F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals, which were benzylfluorides, alkylfluorides, and arylfluorides. Apparently, the [(18)F]-fluoride ion is released by metabolism in the liver in vivo. In conclusion, 3-chloro substituted BzCls are the most stable, which suggests that 3-chloro benzylfluorides will be the most chemically stable compound. This result should be important in future design of radioligands labeled with a benzylfluoride moiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Magata
- PET Department, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Visser TJ, Van Waarde A, Doze P, Wegman T, Vaalburg W. Preclinical testing of N-[(11)c]-methyl-piperidin-4-yl 2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxy-2-phenylacetate, a novel radioligand for detection of cerebral muscarinic receptors using PET. Synapse 2000; 35:62-7. [PMID: 10579809 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(200001)35:1<62::aid-syn8>3.0.co;2-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The muscarinic antagonist N-[(11)C]methyl-piperidin-4-yl 2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxy-2-phenylacetate (VC-004) 1 was tested for visualization of muscarinic receptors in the brain. The active (R)-isomer (pKb = 10.92) was labeled by reacting [(11)C]-CH(3)I with the secondary amine precursor (40-60% decay-corrected radiochemical yield, specific activity 13.0-34.3 TBq/mmol, 45 min after end of bombardment). Biodistribution studies were performed in male Wistar rats. Brain uptake of (R)-[(11)C]-VC-004 was high, standard uptake values (SUVs) ranging from 1.6 in cerebellum to 3.3 in frontal cortex. In all brain regions, the nonsubtype selective muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (2.5 mg/kg) blocked (R)-[(11)C]-VC-004 binding to the same extent (84.6 +/- 3.3%) as nonlabeled (R)-VC-004 (2.0 mg/kg, 83.2 +/- 4.6%). In contrast, the fraction of [(11)C]VC-004 binding which was blocked by atropine (2.5 mg/kg) was significantly smaller (54 +/- 17%). The reduction of (R)-[(11)C]-VC-004 binding by low-dose atropine (0.5 mg/kg) was not significantly different from that caused by (R)-(-)-QNB (20 microg/kg). The decrease in specific binding of (R)-[(11)C]VC-004 after (R)-(-)-QNB block correlated well with literature values for the percentages of M(2) receptors in the brain regions studied. (R)-[(11)C]VC-004 was rapidly cleared from plasma (92% with a half-life of 0.27 min) and the fraction of total plasma radioactivity representing parent compound decreased from 99% to 42% at 10 min postinjection. Although (R)-[(11)C]VC-004 can visualize muscarinic receptors in the brain, it does not show selectivity for the M(2)-subtype. A low dose (0.5 mg/kg) of atropine seems to preferentially block M(2)-receptors in vivo, as has been reported for (R)-(-)-QNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Visser
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Center, Groningen University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|