Quality of life after surgical excision followed by radiotherapy for cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth: evaluation of 78 patients

Quality of Life: determinant of success of head and neck cancer therapy in the battle of survival vs. rehabilitation

BACKGOUND

Surgical treatment for cancers in the oral and maxillofacial region significantly impacts a patient's physical, social, functional, and psychological well-being, which can in-turn affect the Quality of Life (QoL) negatively. The goal of our study was to assess the Quality of Life (QoL) of patients who underwent surgery in our hospital, and we attempted to extrapolate the data which could in the future help improve the QoL of other patients who undergo similar treatments.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study, including patients who have been treated for oral cancer in the last few years in the institute. The standard EORTC Questionnaires QLQ C-30 (version 3.0) and QLQ H and N-35 (version 1.0) were used in this study.

RESULTS

GHS scores were lower in patients with T3 stage tumor than in patients with T1 stage tumor. Patients who underwent surgery along with radiotherapy and those who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy showed a substantial difference in their GHS and FS ratings when their treatment options were compared. Patients who had undergone surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy had higher scores on the symptom scale and QoL H&N-35 than patients who had just undergone surgery and radiotherapy There was no statistically significant difference in the scores, pertaining to the location, age, gender and stage of the tumor but when the comparison was made on the basis of treatment modality chosen, there was a significant difference in the scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of any treatment is to improve the Quality of Life. The EORTC questionnaires QLQ 30 and QLQ H and N-35 proved to be very appropriate instruments to evaluate QoL in patients with oral cancer. Assessment of QoL should always receive adequate attention in treatment planning and rehabilitation. Choice of treatment modality plays a significant role in QoL of patients treated for oral cancer. Henceforth, any treatment modality should be selected not only with a curative intent but also with the goal of improving the Quality of Life as this ultimately decides the success of the therapy from the patient's perspective.

Assessment of Quality of Life in Head-and-Neck Oncologic Patients with Intraoral Soft-Tissue Defects Reconstructed with Buccinator Myomucosal Flap

The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in oncologic patients with intraoral defects reconstructed with the buccinator myomucosal flap. A retrospective study was performed involving 39 patients with intraoral soft-tissue defects, reconstructed with a buccinator myomucosal flap during a six-year period. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires, the standard questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the head-and-neck specific module (QLQ-H&N35). Thirty-nine patients with a mean age of 61.23 ± 15.80 years were included in the study. Thirty-three patients were diagnosed with an oncological condition (84.61%). Six patients (15.38%) developed orosinusal communication and underwent extensive debridement. The median global-health-status score was 79.27 and emotional performance was the lowest scoring, with a mean score of 76.93. As for the symptom items, the most outstanding were dental problems (33.33), oral opening (31.62) and dry mouth (37.61), followed by sticky saliva (24.79), problems with social eating (21.15) and pain (19.87). The most significant symptoms were radiotherapy-related adverse effects such as pain, fatigue, dental problems and dry mouth. Patients reconstructed with the buccinator myomucosal flap develop a good quality of life for all types of activities, and a correct function and aesthetics. Postoperative radiotherapy is associated with a poorer quality of life, and can lead to impairment of several symptoms such as swallowing, oral opening and dry mouth.

Quality of life among head and neck cancer treated patients in South India: A cross-sectional study

Background and aim

The impact of oral health related disease and treatment on the patient's overall well-being and functioning is a topic of growing interest in clinical research and practice. Research shows that there is a significant reduction in the quality of life for the patients throughout the treatment of head and neck cancer. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the quality of life among treated head and neck cancer patients.

Materials and method

The cross sectional study was conducted among 225 head and neck cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ C-30), Quality Of Life Head and Neck35" (QLQ-HN35) instruments were used to assess their quality of life. The study population was divided into three groups based on the treatment done: Group I (Surgery), Group II (Surgery and Radiotherapy) and Group III (Surgery, Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy). Independent t-test and one way ANOVA test were done to analyze the data.

Results

Trouble with opening mouth (34.66 ​± ​30.58) was one of the highest rated symptoms among the study population. Salivary dysfunction leading to dry mouth (33.33 ​± ​34.06), sticky saliva (33.33 ​± ​26.72) were also found to be severe. Among the three groups, the Global Health Status, Symptom Scale mean scores were more high in Group I, Functional Scale and H&N35 symptoms mean scores was high in Group III however no statistical significance was observed (p ​> ​0.05).

Conclusion

Head and neck cancer has severe effects on the quality of life. As observed from the findings of the current study, Global Health Status indicated a healthy level of living among patients who have undergone surgery alone; head and neck symptoms were more severe and problematic among patients who had surgery and radiotherapy. Therefore, assessing health related quality of life can be a factor that is weighed against treatment burden, toxicity, survival benefit. It can be more integral to treatment planning, refining treatment protocols and a better post-operative care and support.

Validation of an Intelligibility Assessment Tool in an Indian Language for Perceptual Speech Analysis in Oral Cancer Patients

This study aimed to develop a speech intelligibility tool in Malayalam, an Indian language, based on the perceptual analysis. The tool had components of vowel, consonant, word, passage, and overall intelligibility. After face and content validation, a sample of 30 consecutive oral cancer patients underwent preliminary testing for internal consistency, inter- and intra-rater reliability, concurrent, and known-group validity. Subsequent validation was done in 80 T1-T4 patients from two centers. The scale had a high level of internal consistency; the Cronbach's alpha was 0.847 and good intra-rater and inter-rater agreement amongst all raters. There was a strong correlation between the Malayalam and the English passage. Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.646 proved concurrent validity. On known-group and subsequent validation, the tool showed expected differences between the treatment groups. The speech tool proved to be reliable and valid for perceptual evaluation of speech intelligibility in oral cancer patients.

Speech intelligibility in patients with oral cancer: An objective baseline evaluation of pretreatment function and impairment

BACKGROUND

This study seeks to identify those factors that influence the pre-therapeutic speech intelligibility in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHOD

A group of 172 patients (125 males, 47 females, mean age = 61 ± 11 a) with different OSCC stages ranging from T1 to T4 and N0 to N2 was examined for their speech intelligibility using a computerized measuring tool, and compared to a healthy reference group (30 males, 10 females, mean age = 59 ± 12 a).

RESULTS

It was found that the pre-therapeutic speech intelligibility in patients with OSCC is decreased when compared to a healthy collective. Two demographic factors that influence speech intelligibility could be identified: sex and age. It was determined that the only disease-related factor that influences speech intelligibility before therapy is the location of the tumor.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study reveal that a preoperative speech intelligibility impairment in patients suffering from OSCC occurs independent of tumor stage, size of the tumor and infiltration status.

Alterações fonoaudiológicas e acesso ao fonoaudiólogo nos casos de óbito por câncer de lábio, cavidade oral e orofaringe: um estudo retrospectivo

RESUMO Objetivos: identificar as alterações fonoaudiológicas e o acesso ao fonoaudiólogo durante o curso da doença, nos casos de óbito por câncer de lábio, cavidade oral e orofaringe, nos residentes de Olinda - PE, em 2012 e 2013. Métodos: estudo descritivo, retrospectivo, cuja população foi composta pelos óbitos por câncer de lábio, cavidade oral e orofaringe, residentes em Olinda, notificados ao Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade e ocorridos nos anos de 2012 e 2013, com assistência integralmente realizada pelo SUS. As informações foram obtidas em entrevistas realizadas com os informantes-chave de cada caso. Para tal, foram utilizados os princípios do protocolo da Autópsia Verbal. As diferenças percentuais foram testadas por meio do teste estatístico Qui- quadrado corrigido de Yates, ou nos casos em que a ocorrência foi inferior a cinco observações, usou-se o Teste Exato de Fisher, com α=5%. Resultados: dos 18 óbitos investigados, em 55,6%, a suspeita de câncer foi por meio da realização do auto-exame, o diagnóstico ocorreu exclusivamente por profissionais médicos, e a língua e a orofaringe aparecem como sítio tumoral de maior ocorrência. Todos os casos apresentaram alguma alteração nas funções estomatognáticas, sendo 88,9% na fala, 83,3% na mastigação e deglutição e 77,8% na voz. Em 27,8% houve a indicação para o tratamento fonoaudiológico, e destes, todos referiram acesso ao profissional no sistema único de saúde. Conclusão: os resultados deste trabalho ratificam que as funções estomatognáticas apresentaram alterações em proporções elevadas, e a despeito disso, poucas pessoas receberam indicação para o acompanhamento fonoaudiológico. No entanto, todos que foram indicados, referiram acesso a este profissional.

Assessment of the quality of life of patients with oral cancer after pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction with a focus on speech

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of patients with oral cancer who had undergone resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth and reconstruction with the pectoralis major flap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study assessed 21 patients who had undergone pectoralis major flap reconstruction using the University of Washington QoL, version 4, questionnaire. A nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of the 12 disease-specific domains, the best 3 scores from the patients were for pain, saliva, and anxiety, and the worst 3 scores were for taste, chewing, and swallowing. The mean UW-QoL composite score was 73.4. Swallowing was considered to be the most important issue within the previous 7 days, followed by chewing and speech. Those patients who had undergone wider excision had poorer speech.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant effect was found on the QoL of patients with oral cancer who had undergone resection of the tongue and floor of the mouth with pectoralis major flap reconstruction.

[Our experience in the treatment advanced neoplasms of floor of the mouth]

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate results of our surgical treatment of advanced neoplasms of the floor of the mouth, treated from 2005-2011 in Department of Otolaryngology and Department of Plastic Surgery Medical University of Gdańsk

MATERIAL

We analyzed group of 12 patients (aged 36 to 70 years, mean 55) treated by primary surgical excision of neoplasms of the floor of the mouth (with tracheotomy and mandibulotomy) and selective or radical neck dissection (uni- or bilateral) in combination with chemoradiotherapy. All patients referees with advancement of locoregional disease: primary tumors (T3 or T4) and neck metastases (N1 or N2b) Most of the patients required to use free microvascular reconstruction with free forearm skin flaps. Histological examinations revealed squamous cell carcinoma (11/12) and adenocarcinoma (1/12).

RESULTS

Two patients die in 1 and 4 months after surgery. Three die from 2 to 3 years after surgery. Rest live from 6 month to 6 year after therapy.

CONCLUSION

Free forearm skin microvascular flap is good (anatomical and functional) for reconstruction for large defects after resection neoplasms of the floor of the mouth.

Oral symptoms and functional outcome related to oral and oropharyngeal cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to assess: (1) oral symptoms of patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer; (2) how patients rank the burden of oral symptoms; (3) the impact of the tumor, the treatment, and oral symptoms on functional outcome.

Methods

Eighty-nine patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer were asked about their oral symptoms related to mouth opening, dental status, oral sensory function, tongue mobility, salivary function, and pain. They were asked to rank these oral symptoms according to the degree of burden experienced. The Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) was used to assess functional outcome. In a multivariate linear regression analyses, variables related to MFIQ scores (p ≤ 0.10) were entered as predictors with MFIQ score as the outcome.

Results

Lack of saliva (52%), restricted mouth opening (48%), and restricted tongue mobility (46%) were the most frequently reported oral symptoms. Lack of saliva was most frequently (32%) ranked as the most burdensome oral symptom.

For radiated patients, an inability to wear a dental prosthesis, a T3 or T4 stage, and a higher age were predictive of MFIQ scores. For non-radiated patients, a restricted mouth opening, an inability to wear a dental prosthesis, restricted tongue mobility, and surgery of the mandible were predictive of MFIQ scores.

Conclusions

Lack of saliva was not only the most frequently reported oral symptom after treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer, but also the most burdensome. Functional outcome is strongly influenced by an inability to wear a dental prosthesis in both radiated and non-radiated patients.

Quality of life in patients submitted to surgical treatment for minor salivary gland neoplasms

This study was aimed at assessing the quality of life in patients submitted to surgical treatment for minor salivary gland neoplasms (MSGN). Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men, mean age: 49.4 years) with histopathologic diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma (PA, 3 cases), polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA, 2 cases), cystic adenoid carcinoma (CAC, 4 cases), and muco-epidermoid carcinoma (MEC, 3 cases) were evaluated. All of them were treated by surgical excision; patients with CAC received radiotherapy as well. The patients quality of life was evaluated through a self-administered questionnaire concerning their physical well-being, emotional status, normal daily activities, and family relationships. The results showed that patients with MEC--the youngest among all patients--reported a significantly greater worsening of their physical well-being and emotional status after treatment as compared with patients treated for PA (P<0.05), and also of their functional activities as compared with those treated for PA and PLGA (P<0.05). In conclusion, age of development of the neoplasm and type of disease produce more impact on patients quality of life than does the therapys degree of aggression.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Oral Cancer: A Review

PURPOSE

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has now become an important outcome measure in the assessment of patients treated for oral cancer. We summarize the influence of various factors in the treatment of oral cancer on HRQOL after surgery.

METHODS

A review of the current literature was carried out.

RESULTS

Site-specific assessment of HRQOL should be encouraged, rather than assessment of head and neck cancer as a whole. In general the long-term HRQOL of oral cancer patients seems good with HRQOL at 1 year being equivalent to long-term HRQOL. A number of different patient and treatment factors were identified that affect HRQOL. These include age, gender, site, stage, emotional status, smoking and alcohol, marital status and income, performance status, method of reconstruction, access, mandibular resection, neck dissection, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and post-operative radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQOL should be considered as part of the overall process of care for oral cancer patients.

Health related quality of life after mandibular resection for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The impact of several clinical parameters on health related quality of life (HrQOL) was evaluated in patients with squamous cell carcinoma adjacent or fixed to the mandible with special emphasis on postoperative radiotherapy and type of mandibular resection. One-hundred and five returned EORTC-questionnaires were available for this study. Correlation analyses were used to determine the relationship between clinical parameters and HrQOL. Postoperative radiotherapy was the clinical parameter that affected HrQOL most. The type of mandibular resection had no influence on HrQOL. The affected QOL-items were all associated with eating problems, i.e. use of a feeding tube, use of nutritional supplements, swallowing, social eating, mouth opening and dry mouth. Postoperative radiotherapy should only be applied if strictly indicated. This implies that the application of postoperative radiotherapy may need reconsideration in cases without strict criteria for postoperative radiotherapy.

[Quality of life of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the changes in quality of life during and after treatment in patients with cancer of the oral cavity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the period between October 1999 and September 2000, 57 patients of the Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University of Cologne, underwent surgery, radiation therapy or the combination of both for the treatment of cancer of the oral cavity. Before, during and after the therapy their quality of life was measured with two psychometric scales.

RESULTS

The average loss of quality of life in the female group was less than in the male group. Younger patients suffered more than older ones did. All patients had a loss of quality of life 3 months after the beginning of the therapy. The biggest decrease was in the group of patients treated with combined therapy, and the lowest loss in the radiated group. During the assessment period of 9 months, there were significant differences between all three groups. The size of the tumor did not show any influence on the reduction of quality of life. Patients with cancer of the tongue or maxilla showed more loss of quality of life than patients with tumors located in other regions of the oral cavity.

CONCLUSION

Location of the tumor, age, gender of the patient, and type of therapy influenced the quality of life, while the size of the tumor did not.

Shoulder and neck morbidity in quality of life after surgery for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Quality of life has become a major issue in determining the outcome of treatment in head and neck surgery with curative intent. The aim of our study was to determine which factors in the postoperative care, especially shoulder and neck morbidity, are related to quality of life and how these outcomes compared between patients who had undergone surgery and a control group.

METHODS

We analyzed physical symptoms, psychological symptoms, and social and functional well-being at least 1 year after surgery and evaluated the differences in quality of life between patients who had undergone head and neck surgery and a control group.

RESULTS

Depression scores contributed significantly to all domains of quality of life. Reduced shoulder abduction, shoulder pain, and neck pain are related to several domains of quality of life. The patient group scored significantly worse for social functioning and limitations from physical problems but scored significantly better for bodily pain and health changes.

CONCLUSION

Depression and shoulder and neck morbidity are important factors in quality of life for patients who have undergone surgery for head and neck cancer.

Sociodemographic risk indicators for depressive symptoms among persons with oral cancer or oral epithelial dysplasia

PURPOSE

We report findings from a study that measured associations between sociodemographic risk indicators and depressive symptoms among individuals diagnosed with either oral cancer or a premalignant lesion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incident cases of oral cancer and oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) were identified by reviewing pathology reports generated by 3 oral pathology laboratories serving primarily community-based oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Subjects were interviewed by telephone to collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale, and social support using the Berkman Social Network Inventory.

RESULTS

The analysis included 167 oral cancer and 234 OED cases. Nineteen percent of the subjects had a CES-D score indicative of clinical depression (CES-D > or =16). Forward and backward stepwise logistic regression identified diagnosis (cancer/OED), age, social support, employment status, and gender as sociodemographic indicators of CES-D scores of 16+. In the final model, which also controlled for smoking and drinking, the odds of having elevated CES-D scores (16+) were 79% higher among oral cancer relative to OED cases. The odds of high CES-D scores were significantly reduced in persons over the age of 50 compared with those aged 50 years and younger as well as in persons with higher, relative to low, levels of social support and in persons employed outside the home compared with those who were not. Although not statistically significant, men were more likely to have CES-D scores indicative of clinical depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of sociodemographic characteristics may assist the clinician in identifying those individuals with an elevated risk of concomitant depressive symptoms.

Quality of life 2-10 years after combined treatment for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer

This study reports the findings of an evaluation of Quality of Life (QOL) in long-term survivors of advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (combined treatment=multimodal therapy). All patients had T2-T4 tumours and all received locoregional radical resection and simultaneous microvascular reconstruction. From 1990 to 1998, 181 patients have been treated at the University Hospital of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery in Vienna. 100 (55%) of these patients were alive and free of disease in 2000. Sixty-seven of them completed the EORTC questionnaires QLQ 30 and QLQ H&N 35. We found these questionnaires to be very good tools for determining QOL, which constitutes part of the therapeutic success. Patients tended to report good to very good QOL. A comparison between groups according to clinical data was conducted as well as a group comparison of patients who claimed especially high or low QOL in the questionnaires. It was found that combined treatment not only offers the best chances for survival, but also allows a subsequent QOL, that is comparable to other forms of therapy.

Can we assess quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer? A preliminary report from the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics

Survival statistics alone may no longer be valid when used as evidence of effective outcomes. Patient satisfaction is an end point that needs further evaluation and should be included in the outcomes assessment. A 133-item questionnaire has been designed by a special committee of the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics (AAMP) to assess the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer impacting the orofacial region. This survey will be distributed to the entire population of 7 geographically dispersed treatment centers in the United States for a 2-year period. Patients will be stratified into several subgroups, including radiation/nonradiation, maxillary/mandibular, and surgical reconstruction/prostheses. Separate analyses will be conducted for each subgroup, and comparisons will be made within subgroups to test the sensitivity of the questionnaire to a known difference. A revised version of the AAMP questionnaire, limited to 50 items of interest to patients, will be validated against 2 established head and neck cancer questionnaires. This article provides background on previous quality-of-life studies and reviews the need for and aims of the AAMP assessment instrument.

Importance-rating using the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire in patients treated by primary surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

There are now several validated and widely accepted head and neck cancer questionnaires. These record patients subjective levels of function and dysfunction, as well as symptoms related to their cancer and its treatment. One popular measure is the University of Washington head and neck cancer questionnaire (UW-QOL). Domain importance-ratings were added to the second version of the questionnaire, which was published in 1997. It is unique amongst head and neck cancer questionnaires in this respect.

AIM

The purpose of the study was to evaluate UW-QOL with particular reference to domain importance-rating. It was also the intention to investigate how the importance-ratings related to 'quality of life' and comment on the cumulative scoring of the questionnaire.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with previously untreated oral or oro-pharyngeal cancer were recruited. All were treated by primary surgery. Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively, 6 months and 1 year post-operatively.

RESULTS

This study demonstrates a wide variation in importance-ratings. Both pre- and post-treatment there was a general lack of correlation between importance-rating and domain scores. At all time points, patients tended to rate speech, chewing and swallowing as more important than the other UW-QOL domains. The cumulative UW-QOL score correlated strongly with the new single item QOL question.

CONCLUSION

It remains unclear how best to incorporate importance-ratings into a single UW-QOL total score. However, for individual patients they can assist in setting priorities in treatment strategies.

Clinical function after primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: an 11-item examination

The aim of this study was to record clinical function using an 11-item clinical examination and identify the main postoperative functional deficits. Of 132 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for previously untreated disease between January 1995 and June 1997, 130 were recruited in the study. An 11-domain clinical examination was made on the day before operation, and at 6 and 12 months afterwards. This examination assessed lip competence, tongue movement, oral mucosa, dental state, mouth opening, speech, drooling, diet, appearance, oral sensation and shoulder movement. Preoperatively there were deficits in natural dentition, consistency of diet and tongue protrusion. Postoperatively functional scores fell particularly for tongue movements, mouth opening, mucosa, dentition, speech, diet, appearance, lip sensation and tongue sensation. At 1 year, dental status, sensation and oral mucosa were particularly defective. Patients with large tumours, free tissue transfer, or adjuvant radiotherapy had the worst levels of function.A simple clinical examination provides a rapid assessment of function that can be used in conjunction with validated questionnaires to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of outcome.

Impact of intraoral soft-tissue reconstruction on the development of quality of life after ablative surgery in patients with oral cancer

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the impact of intraoral soft-tissue reconstruction on the development of quality of life after ablative surgery for oral cancer. A total of 107 patients were enrolled in the study during the period between 1997 and 1999. Quality of life was assessed by using the quality-of-life core questionnaire and the head and neck module of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. The questionnaires were distributed to the patients preoperatively on the day of hospital admission and 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 53 patients filled in all questionnaires and were available for complete longitudinal analysis. The changes in the scores and the impact of defect size, location, and anatomy, the extent of mandibular resection, and the mode of soft-tissue reconstruction were tested longitudinally for statistical significance by using repeated-measures analysis of variance procedures. Of all parameters tested, the mode of soft-tissue reconstruction had the most profound impact on the development of quality of life after ablative surgery for oral cancer in that it was associated with statistically significant changes in the most domains or items associated with postoperative quality of life. In contrast to local flaps, revascularized soft-tissue repair with forearm flaps was associated with an intermittent deterioration of physical and functional scores but was followed by improvement until the end of the first year, and it even surpassed the preoperative baseline level in oral functional and social domains. In large-volume defects, which required repair by myocutaneous grafts, quality of life was not restored to the same extent, and physical, functional, and social domains remained significantly lower.

Functional status of patients with oral cancer and its relation to style of coping, social support and psychological status

Sixty-eight patients were evaluated 6 months to 6 years after treatment for oral cancer using standardized questionnaires to explore the influence of age, sex, site and stage of tumour, and primary treatment on their functional status measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QoL), and the association between functional status and psychological outcome measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), style of coping measured by the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Questionnaire (MAC-Q), and social support measured by the Short-Form Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ-6). Young patients, women, patients with advanced tumours, those with oropharyngeal tumours and those who had been treated with both surgery and radiotherapy reported worse function. The worse the functional domain, the more likely it was to be associated with anxiety, depression and ineffective coping style, and better functional scores were weakly associated with fighting spirit, level of social support and satisfaction with that support. We have identified patients at need and highlighted their problems. Dealing with these problems may ultimately improve the perception of function after treatment of oral cancer.

Radical combined treatment of locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly

PURPOSE

Few studies have described the effects of aggressive combined therapy for locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly. Our study evaluated the outcome of this particular cohort of patients after such treatments.

METHODS

Survival, failure, morbidity, and complication rates were determined retrospectively in 43 elderly patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer who underwent curative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (n = 33) or neoadjuvant, 3-drug chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (n = 10) between the years 1977 and 1992.

RESULTS

The crude survival rate at 3 years was 27% in patients managed by surgery plus radiotherapy, and 30% in individuals treated with chemoradiation; the corresponding locoregional failure rates were 23% and 30%; and the distant failure rates were 13% and 0%, respectively. The acute toxicity rate was 12% in the surgery plus radiotherapy group and 30% in the chemoradiation patients; the corresponding late complication rates were 0% and 10%. There were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSION

Radical combined treatments can be performed safely and achieve long-term, disease-free survival in selected elderly patients with locally extensive head and neck cancer.