Myocardial revascularization in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Long term follow-up in 141 patients

Predicting outcomes in patients with low ejection fraction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft

Introduction

Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a well-known predictor of adverse events after cardiac surgery. We aimed to assess the outcomes in patients with low LVEF undergoing coronary artery bypass graft.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort, we included all patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40 who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between March 2007 and March 2016 (with a median follow-up of nine years) at Tehran Heart Center. Demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted from the data registry. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used. The univariate Cox regression was performed. We investigated the predictors of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) using Cox multivariable regression.

Results

In total, 5,532 cases (79 % male) with a mean age of 65.58 were included in the study. The nine-year overall survival was calculated at 68 %, and more than half of the patients had MACCE (55 %). In adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis, moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation, glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60, mild right ventricular dysfunction, and valvular heart disease independently predicted higher mortality. The abovementioned predictors and peripheral vascular disease significantly increased MACCE.

Conclusion

Our study indicates the clinical significance of mitral regurgitation, valvular heart disease, and renal function in patients with low ejection fraction treated by coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Identifying predictors of adverse events can help with clinical decision-making and risk stratification, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Outcomes and Direct Cost of Isolated Nonemergent CABG in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is one of the main predictors of outcomes in cardiac surgery. We present current era outcomes and associated direct cost in nonemergent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients with LVEF <20% over the past 6 years and compare it with higher EF subgroups.

METHODS

Six-year data from 2016 to 2022 at hospitals sharing Society of Thoracic Surgeons and financial data with Biome Analytics were analyzed based on 3 EF subgroups (EF ≤20%, EF 21% to 35%, and EF >35%). Outcomes and costs were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality of 12,649 patients was 1.9%. The EF ≤20% (n = 248), EF 21% to 35% (n = 1,408), and EF >35 (n = 10,993) cohorts had mortality of 6.9%, 3.7%, and 1.6%, respectively. The EF ≤20% subgroup had higher use of cardiopulmonary bypass, blood products, and mechanical support. In addition, the EF ≤20% subgroup had higher complication rates in almost all measured categories. Also, the EF ≤20% cohort had significantly higher length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) hours, ICU and hospital readmissions, and lowest discharge to home rate. The strongest factors associated with mortality were postoperative cardiac arrest, renal failure requiring dialysis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, sepsis, prolonged ventilation, and gastrointestinal event. The overall median direct cost of care was $37,387.79 ($27,605.18, $51,720.96), with a median direct cost of care in the EF ≤20%, EF 21% to 35%, and EF >35% subgroups of $52,500.17 ($34,103.52, $80,806.79), $44,108.32 ($31,597.58, $63,788.03), and $36,521.80 ($27,168.91, $50,019.31), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In nonemergent isolated CABG surgery, low EF continues to have higher surgical risks and higher direct cost of care despite advances in cardiovascular care.

A comparison of drug-eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting in mildly to moderately ischemic heart failure

Aims

The best revascularization strategy for patients with ischaemic heart failure (IHF) remains unclear. Current evidence and guidelines mainly focus on patients with severe ischaemic heart failure (ejection fraction [EF] < 35%). There are limited data comparing clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with implantation of drug‐eluting stents (DESs) in patients with mild to moderate ischaemic heart failure (EF 35–50%). It is therefore unknown whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES implantation can provide comparable outcomes to CABG in these patients.

Methods and results

From January 2016 to December 2017, we enrolled patients with mildly to moderately reduced EF (35–50%) who had undergone PCI with DESs or CABG. Patients with a history of CABG, presented with acute ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or acute heart failure, and patients who had undergone CABG concomitant valvular or aortic surgery were excluded. Propensity score‐matching analysis was performed between the two groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were applied to assess all‐cause mortality and individual end points. A total of 2050 patients (1330 PCIs and 720 CABGs) were included, and median follow‐up was 45 months (interquartile range 40 to 54). There were significant differences in all‐cause death between the two groups: 77 patients in the PCI group and 27 in the CABG group (DES vs. CABG: 5.8% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.045). After propensity score matching for the entire population, 601 matched pairs were obtained. The long‐term cumulative rate of all‐cause death was significantly different between the two groups (DES vs. CABG: 5.8% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.006). No differences were found in the rates of cardiac death (DES vs. CABG: 4.8% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.096), recurrent MI (DES vs. CABG: 4.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.234), and stroke (DES vs. CABG: 6.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.163). The rate of repeat coronary revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (12.1% vs. 6.0%, P = 0.000).

Conclusions

Considering the higher long‐term survival rate and lower repeat‐revascularization rate, CABG may be superior to DES implantation in patients with mildly to moderately reduced EF (35–50%) and significant CAD.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and effective in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) is associated with increased risk following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Due to a dearth of reports on the choice of CABG technique in patients with LVD, this study aims to compare the outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) and conventional CABG (ONCAB) in such patients.

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre propensity-matched analysis comparing early- and long-term outcomes of OPCAB and ONCAB in patients with severe LVD. Primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2014, a total of 1161 consecutive patients with severe LVD underwent isolated CABG [442 patients underwent OPCAB and 719 ONCAB (430 matched pairs)]. Incomplete revascularization was observed more frequently among OPCAB than ONCAB patients (35.3% vs 21.6%; P < 0.01). The overall 30-day mortality was 5% and was comparable between the matched groups [OR 0.64 (0.34-1.22); P = 0.18]. OPCAB patients had shorter median hospital stay (11 vs 12 days; P = 0.02) and lower packed red blood cell transfusion rates [2.7 (2.21-3.19) vs 4.4 (3.56-5.24); P < 0.01]. Estimated adjusted survival was 86.0% vs 85.8%, 69.1% vs 65.5% and 59.9% vs 49.1% at 1, 5 and 10 years for OPCAB and ONCAB patients, respectively (P = 0.99). Long-term risk of mortality was similar between groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94 (0.66-1.32); P = 0.7]. Incomplete revascularization was weakly associated with increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality [HR 1.33 (0.99-1.77); P = 0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB is safe and effective in patients with severe LVD. Although incomplete revascularization is more commonly observed in patients undergoing OPCAB, it is not associated with increased late mortality.

Impact of Pre-, Intra-and Post-Operative Parameters on In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Scarce Single-Center Experience in Resource-Scare Setting

Background

In-hospital mortality after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains an important issue that has needed considerable attention in recent years as the mortality rate is still high and prevention factors are not yet optimal. Our study presents the first largest cohort of emergency CABG from one large institution in Vietnam with the primary aim of comparing a large variety of pre-, intra-and post-operative parameters between in-hospital mortality patients and in-hospital survival patients and investigate risk factors of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing emergency CABG.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data in patients undergoing emergency CABG at the Hanoi Heart Hospital (Hanoi, Vietnam) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Primary outcome variable was in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 71 patients were included in final analysis. The mean age of the cohort was 68.68 years (± 9.28, range 38-86). The mean weight, height and body mass index were 54.35 kg (± 9.17, range 37-77), 158.96 (±7.64, range 145-179) and 21.48 kg/m² (±3.08, range 13.59-30.08), respectively. In-hospital mortality rate was 9.86%. Preoperative risk factors for in-hospital mortality included diabetes, decreased ejection fraction (EF), EF below 30%, cardiogenic shock, elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), elevated NT-ProBNP, and Euroscore II. Without grafting with left internal thoracic artery, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time were increased intraoperative factors for in-hospital mortality risk. In-hospital mortality's postoperative risk factors were found to be postextubation respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, ventricular fibrillation, dialysis-requiring acute renal failure, pneumonia, bacterial sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and prolonged mechanical ventilation time. Significant predictors determining in-hospital mortality were known as prolonged CPB time in surgery and postoperative ventricular fibrillation.

Conclusion

Our hospital mortality rate after emergency CABG was relatively high. An optimal preventive strategy in emergency CABG management should target significant factors combined with other previously identified risk factors to reduce in-hospital mortality.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with severely reduced ventricular function-A justified strategy?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Low ejection fraction (EF) has been identified as a main risk factor for perioperative complications and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and early as well as midterm outcomes of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) and conventional CABG (ONCAB) surgery in patients with reduced EF.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patient demographics, preoperative risk factors, operative and postoperative outcomes of patients with left ventricular EF (LV-EF) ≤35%, who underwent CABG at our institution between January 2015 and December 2017. Propensity score and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare risk adjusted outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 111 consecutive CABG-patients with LV-EF ≤ 35% underwent either ONCAB (46 patients, 41.4%) or OPCAB surgery (65 patients, 58.6%). There was no difference in early mortality (5% vs. 7.5%, p = .64) between groups. After propensity score matching, OPCAB-patients required significantly less re-sternotomies for bleeding (20% vs. 2.5%, p = .03) and consequently received significantly less blood transfusions (57.5% vs. 32.5%, p = .03). Fewer OPCAB-patients experienced low cardiac output syndrome (22.5% vs. 42.5%, p = .06) and suffered from postoperative delirium (22.5% vs. 42.5%, p = .06). There were no differences in completeness of revascularization between groups (median 1 (1.0-1.33; 1.0-1.33) OPCAB versus median 1 (1-1.33; 0.67-2) ONCAB, p = .95). Survival after 6 months, one year and three years was similar for ONCAB- and OPCAB-patients (ONCAB 92.3%, 89.4%, and 89.4% vs. OPCAB 89.8%, 85.7%, and 82.1%; p = .403). More ONCAB-patients needed a coronary re-intervention during follow-up (8.6% vs. 2.3%, p = .402).

CONCLUSION

OPCAB-surgery is a safe and effective option for patients with reduced EF. Furthermore, it does not come at the expense of less complete revascularization or increased coronary re-intervention during early follow-up.

Evaluation of β-blocker therapy for long-term outcomes in patients with low ejection fraction after cardiac surgery

Background

Preoperative low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been reported as an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. However, there were few studies evaluating the long-term mortality in these patients. We, therefore, conducted this study to investigate long-term outcomes of surgery on patients with LVEF≤35% undergoing a broad range of cardiac procedures.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study in 510 patients from January 1, 2007 to September 1, 2019. These patients were divided into survival group (n = 386) and non-survival group (n = 124). The multivariate Cox analysis was used to estimate the risk factors for survival. In Cox analysis, β-blockers were indicated to be associated with long-term mortality. To further address bias, we derived a propensity score predicting the function of β-blockers on survival, and matched 52 cases to 52 controls with similar risk profiles.

Results

Patients were followed for a median period of 24 months (interquartile range: 11–44 months). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the non-survival group had higher weight, higher EuroSCORE, more smoking patients, longer time of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), more intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use, and more patients who always used β-blocker (HR: 2.056, 95%CI:1.236–3.420, P = 0.005) compared with survival group. After propensity matching, the group which always used β-blocker showed higher rate of all-cause death compare with the control group (61.54% vs 80.77%, P = 0.030).

Conclusions

The risk factors for long-term survival were weight, EuroSCORE, smoking, CPB, IABP, always used β-blockers in patients with LVEF≤35%. The discharge prescription of β-blocker should be cautiously administrated in those patients.

Risk of conventional cardiac surgery among patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction in the era of mechanical circulatory support

BACKGROUND

Despite suggestions that severe left ventricle dysfunction may warrant selection of durable mechanical circulatory support over conventional surgery, comparative studies are lacking due to incomplete characterization of patients at highest risk after conventional surgery. We sought to define subsets of patients with severe left ventricle dysfunction who are at greatest mortality risk following conventional cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We studied 892 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent conventional coronary or valve surgery from 1993 to 2014, with preoperative ejection fraction ≤ 25%. Exclusions were transcatheter interventions, major concomitant procedures, active endocarditis, and prior/concurrent durable mechanical circulatory support use. Logistic and Cox regression identified determinants of early and late mortality.

RESULTS

Median age was 70 years (interquartile range, 62-76 years), 46% (n = 411) had New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV symptoms, and 16% (n = 142) had undergone prior surgery. Operative mortality was 7.5%. NYHA functional class IV (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; P = .033), prior cardiac surgery (OR, 2.13; P = .017), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 2.55; P = .001), emergency status (OR, 2.68; P = .024), and intra-aortic balloon pump use (OR, 4.95; P < .001) independently predicted operative death. Risk imparted by presence of both NYHA functional class IV symptoms and prior surgery was additive, with a 4-fold increase in early mortality risk (OR, 3.95; P = .003). Prior surgery increased the hazard of late death by 60% (P < .001). In patients without prior surgery, late mortality was greatest in those aged ≥ 70 years (hazard ratio, 1.86; P < .001), especially if NYHA functional class IV symptoms were concurrently present (hazard ratio, 2.25; P < .001). Surgery type (coronary artery bypass graft surgery, aortic valve surgery, or mitral valve surgery) did not predict long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients referred for conventional surgery with an ejection fraction ≤ 25%, prior cardiac surgery, and/or NYHA functional class IV symptoms-particularly in those aged ≥ 70 years-confer significant and sustained survival disadvantages. Such high-risk subsets may benefit from durable mechanical circulatory support consideration.

Comparison of Levosimendan versus Dobutamine in Patients with Moderate to Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Prospective Study

Context:

Recent upsurge in referral of patients with compromised left ventricular (LV) function for cardiac surgery has led to an increasing use inotropes to achieve improvement of tissue perfusion in the perioperative period.

Aims and Objectives:

To compare the hemodynamic effects and immediate postoperative outcomes with levosimendan and dobutamine in patients with moderate to severe LV dysfunction undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB).

Settings and Design:

University teaching hospital, randomized control study.

Materials and Methods:

Eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40 each. Group I received levosimendan at 0.1 μg/kg/min and Group II received dobutamine at 5 μg/kg/min. Hemodynamic data were noted at 30 min, during obtuse marginal grafting, 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI), left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) and right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), mixed venous oximetry (SvO₂), and lactate were measured.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Chi-square and Student's t-test.

Results:

The HR, MAP, PCWP, SVRI, and PVRI were lower in Group I when compared to Group II. Group I patients showed a statistically significant increase in LVSWI, RVSWI, and CI, when compared to Group II. Comparatively, Group I patients maintained higher SvO₂ and lower lactate levels. Duration of ventilation, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and hospital stay were lower in Group I.

Conclusions:

Levosimendan was associated with statistically significant increase in indices of contractility (CI, LVSWI, and RVSWI) and decrease in PCWP during and after OPCAB. Levosimendan group had lower incidence of atrial fibrillation, shorter length of ICU, and hospital stay.

PET scan before CABG in diabetes

Background and objectives

Since the role of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in diabetes is not clear, this study sought to assess the usefulness of PET scanning for viability in this patient group.

Methods

Forty-four per cent insulin-treated, and 56% non-insulin-treated diabetic patients with severely impaired left ventricular function (LVEF 29± 9%) underwent first coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Pre-operative viability was assessed by PET scan.

Results

Eighty-two per cent of patients received ≥3 grafts. Twenty-seven patients were discharged home and followed for a mean 3.5±1.6 years. Postoperative LVEF improved to 40±9 (p<0.0001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the only variable that predicted improvement in global LV function was presence of hibernating segments at PET scan. The single variable that predicted deterioration of LVEF was the number of segments with reduced perfusion and metabolism at PET scan.

Conclusion

PET scan is an accurate tool for prediction of global left ventricular function recovery following CABG in people with diabetes.

Off-Pump Revascularization for Significant Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Left ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of perioperative morbidity and mortality in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Obligatory global myocardial ischemia and injury induced during crossclamping as well as adverse systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass may induce a disproportionately greater overall physiologic insult in patients with poor ventricular function. All patients undergoing nonemergency off-pump coronary artery bypass by a single surgeon during an 18-month period were retrospectively analyzed. Two groups with preoperative ejection fraction classified as poor (10%–35%; n = 31) or normal (55%–80%; n = 60) were compared. The mean ejection fractions were 26% ± 1% and 63% ± 1% respectively, p < 0.000001. In those with significant left ventricular dysfunction, there were 2.8 ± 0.1 grafts per patient, time to extubation was 8.4 ± 1.2 hours, and discharge was after 4.9 ± 0.6 days. These results were statistically equivalent to those in the group with normal left ventricular function. There was no intraaortic balloon pump insertion or mortality in either group. This technique provides an effective means of safely revascularizing patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction, and it may provide a valuable alternative approach in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Coronary surgery in patients with low ejection fraction: mid-term results

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of preoperative low ejection fraction (≤30%) on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. We also investigated the effect of pre- and perioperative factors on survival.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2009, 103 (6.2%) patients with an ejection fraction ≤30% and 1554 (93.8%) with an ejection fraction >30% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting.

RESULTS

In multivariate logistic regression analysis, cardiopulmonary bypass time, operation time, prolonged inotropic support, and intensive care unit stay were independent predictors of mortality in patients with low ejection fraction. Intensive care unit and hospital stays were significantly longer in these patients, and the postoperative mortality rate was significantly higher. Advanced age (≥70 years) influenced mortality during the follow-up of patients with low ejection fraction. Midterm survival was significantly reduced in patients with ejection fraction ≤30%. Smoking, prolonged inotropic support, and prolonged ventilatory support were independent predictors of midterm survival in patients with ejection fraction ≤30%.

CONCLUSION

On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed in patients with ejection fraction ≤30%, with reasonable mortality and morbidity rates.

Off-pump surgery: is it beneficial in patients with left ventricular dysfunction?

On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery remains the gold standard for complex multivessel disease. Off-pump revascularization has matured as a technique over the last twenty years, but is used in less than 20% of cases worldwide. The poor uptake has been attributed to the significant learning curve in learning the procedure and conflicting evidence reports, together with concerns over mortality related conversion, graft patency and completeness of revascularization. Given these concerns, patient selection continues to be paramount and the subgroups that benefit most are hotly debated. Patients with left ventricular dysfunction constitute a high-risk subgroup which is enlarging in size. There is some evidence to suggest that avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass in this group may lead to superior results in terms of early mortality, non-cardiac complications and organ dysfunction. Even with the theoretical risk of incomplete revascularization, the technique may be an attractive option in managing high-risk patients.

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with coronary artery disease and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Limited data are available on comparing the clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function in the DES era. From January 2003 to December 2010, 953 patients with reduced left ventricular systolic function, defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs (n = 402) or CABG (n = 551) were enrolled in a retrospective, observational registry. Patients with acute myocardial infarction were excluded. Propensity score-matching analysis was also performed in 141 patient pairs. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The median follow-up duration was 32 months (interquartile range 15 to 61). All-cause death occurred in 81 patients (20.1%) in the DES group and 98 patient (17.8%) in the CABG group (p = 0.524). After propensity score matching, the long-term cumulative rate of death was not significantly different between the 2 groups (DES vs CABG 21.3% vs 19.1%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 2.66, p = 0.603). However, the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (35.5% vs 24.1%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 2.77, p = 0.036) was higher in the DES group than the CABG group. This was driven by the higher incidence of repeat revascularization in the DES group (11.3% vs 4.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 3.65, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.37, p = 0.018). In conclusion, DES implantation provides comparable long-term clinical outcomes, except for repeat revascularization, to CABG in patients with coronary artery disease and chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: predictors of long-term survival and impact of surgical strategies

BACKGROUND

In the surgical management of ischemic cardiomyopathy, factors associated with long-term prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing CABG.

METHODS

Out of 6084 patients who underwent CABG between 1997 and 2011, 476 patients (aged 62.6 ± 9.3 years, 100 females) were identified as having severe LV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤ 35%), preoperatively. All-cause mortality and adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke and hospitalization due to cardiovascular causes) were evaluated during a median follow-up period of 55.2 months (inter-quartile range: 26.4-94.8 months).

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 187 patients (39.3%) died and 126 cardiac events occurred in 104 patients (21.8%). Five-year survival and event-free survival rates were 72.1 ± 2.2% and 61.3 ± 2.4%, respectively. On Cox-regression analysis, old age (P < 0.001), recent MI (P < 0.001), history of coronary stenting (P = 0.023), decreased glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.001), and presence of mitral regurgitation (≥moderate) (P = 0.012) or LV wall thinning (P = 0.007) emerged as significant and independent predictors of death. After adjustment for important covariates affecting outcomes, none of the pump strategy (off-pump vs. on-pump), concomitant mitral surgery or surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) affected survival or event-free survival (P = 0.082 to >0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival following CABG in patients with severe LV dysfunction was affected by age, renal function, recent MI, prior coronary stenting, and presence of mitral regurgitation or LV wall thinning. Neither concomitant mitral surgery nor SVR, however, had significant influence on clinical outcomes.

Comparison between normothermic and mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in myocardial revascularization of patients with left ventricular dysfunction

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate whether normothermic bypass is superior to mild hypothermia in patients with poor left ventricular function. This was achieved by studying defibrillation rates, postoperative requirements of cardiac pacing or other morbidity issues and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction operated upon for elective coronary revascularization.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from 252 consecutive patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%) undergoing coronary revascularization between January 2005 and January 2011. Patients operated upon under mild hypothermia (32 ºC) were placed in Group 1 and under normothermia (≥35 ºC) were placed in Group 2. Comorbidities and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 128 patients in Group 1 and 124 patients in Group 2. Plasma concentrations of CK-MB and troponin T peaked at 6 hours postoperatively, with no significant difference between the groups. Despite longer aortic cross-clamp time and total bypass time in Group 2, significantly less defibrillation requirement rates after aortic declamping was observed. Hospital mortality occured in 16 patients; 8 patients in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Normothermia enables less requirement for defibrillation after aortic declamping and postoperative cardiac pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, which may be interpreted as better myocardial protection under normothermic bypass. However, maintaining normothermia had no effect on postoperative stroke, postoperative atrial fibrillation, renal failure development and mortality.

Long-term outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left ventricular dysfunction

PURPOSE

We assessed the long-term clinical, angiographic, and echocardiographic outcomes of patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40%) who underwent isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

One hundred sixty one patients were included. Mean age was 67.2 ± 11.4 years, and 20 patients (12.4%) were female. Eighty-eight patients (54.7%) were New York Heart Association functional class 3 or 4. Early postoperative and follow-up angiography and echocardiography findings were analyzed, and mid-term survival rates (mean follow-up 40.7 ± 25.6 months) were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean number of distal anastomoses was 4.4 ± 1.3. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts were used in 84.5% of patients. Operative mortality was 2.5%. Early patency rate of anastomoses was 98.3%. Early postoperative ejection fraction improved from 33.1 ± 5.6% preoperatively to 36.9 ± 9.5% (p <0.001). Seven-year survival rate was 73.9 ± 5.3%, and freedom from cardiac events rate was 68.5 ± 5.2%. One-year patency rate of anastomoses was 85.8%. Follow-up ejection fraction was 39.1 ± 10.7% (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early and long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction were favorable, including early postoperative and follow-up patency rates of anastomoses and echocardiographic recovery of ejection fraction.

[Results of coronary artery bypass grafting with left ventricular dysfunction (comparison of off-pump versus on-pump)]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the results of myocardial revascularisation with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred and sixteen consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2000 through December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. One hundred and eight cases had a left ventricular EF (ejection fraction) of 45% or less. Of these patients, 78 underwent conventional coronary artery bypass (CCABG) and 30 underwent off-pump procedure (OCABG). The CCABG group received 300IU/kg of heparin while the OCABG received 100IU/kg. The off-pump coronary surgery was carried out using a tissue stabilizer Octopus II. Different pre-, per- and postoperative variables were evaluated among both groups. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 11.5. The variables were compared between these two groups using univariate analysis (Chi(2) test, Fisher's test exact) for qualitative variable and (Student's t test, Mann-Whitney's test) for quantitative variable.

RESULTS

Patients profiles and risk factors were similar among both groups except for age (CCABG: 57.8±9.2 year vs OCABG: 52±9.9 year; P=0.004) and left ventricular EF (CCABG: 37.4±6.3% vs OCABG: 34±7.8%; P=0.02). The number of grafts performed per patient was significantly more among patients who underwent extracorporeal circulation (CCABG: 2.53±0.7 graft/patient vs OCABG: 1.77±0.8 graft/patient; P<0.0001). The hospital mortality was more among CCABG group 9% vs 3.3% in OCABG but the difference was not significant (P=0.3). However, the operative time and the operative room stay were long in CCABG (252±61min vs 175±38min; P<0.0001 - 389±70min vs 298±54min; P<0.0001). The ventilation time was also long in CCABG (32.3±67hour vs 10.4±5.9hour; P=0.15). There was more postoperative myocardial infarction in CCABG (P=0.008), but the EF increased and was better in CCABG.

CONCLUSION

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery provides satisfactory operative results for most patients with reduced left ventricular function. Prospective and randomly study will be necessary before concluding.

Myocardial recovery with left ventricular assist devices

OPINION STATEMENT

Advanced heart failure (HF) is a condition that is rarely thought of in terms of cure. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), like no therapy before them, provide complete decongestion of the left ventricle, with resulting favorable changes at all levels, from reversal of hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes to recovery of normal geometry and function of the ventricles. Although not a frequent phenomenon at most institutions, LV recovery is achieved in 20-25 % of LVAD recipients in some programs. Patients with good chances for recovery are usually young, with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and short duration of HF symptoms. After LVAD removal, patients with recovered function remain asymptomatic for years. To reach this level of sustainable restoration of cardiac function, several steps need to be taken: 1) myocardial recovery has to be recognized as a therapeutic goal, especially in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy; 2) HF medications have to be restarted and aggressively uptitrated after LVAD implantation; 3) regular monitoring for signs of myocardial recovery (eg, echocardiography or hemodynamics) should become a standard practice in LVAD centers; and 4) weaning protocols should be discussed and accepted at each LVAD program. While some protocols involve extensive several-day testing both at rest and with exercise, others are mostly guided by echocardiographic evaluation.

Revascularization among patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis of observational studies

AIMS

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is the standard of care for the management of patients with severe three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the optimal strategy for management of patients with CAD and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction [ejection fraction (EF) ≤35%] is not clear. A meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to determine the operative mortality and long-term (5-year actuarial survival) outcomes among patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing CABG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic computerized literature search was performed and observational studies consisting of patients undergoing isolated CABG for CAD and severe LV dysfunction were included. Studies that did not report operative mortality, long-term (≥1 year) survival data, or pre-operative EF and multiple studies from the same group were excluded. In total, 4119 patients from 26 observational clinical studies were included. The estimated mean age was 63.9 years and 82.4% of patients were men. The mean (estimate) pre-operative EF was 24.7% (95% CI 22.5-27.0%). The operative mortality among patients (26 studies, n= 3621) who underwent on-pump CABG was 5.4%, n= 189 (95% CI 4.5-6.4%). The 5-year actuarial survival among patients (13 studies, n= 1980) who underwent on-pump CABG was 73.4%, n= 1483 (95% CI 68.7-77.7%). Patients who underwent off-pump CABG (7 studies, n= 498) tended to have reduced operative mortality of 4.4%, n= 20 (95% CI 2.8-6.4%). The mean (estimate) post-operative EF was 35.19% (95% CI 31.95-38.43%).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis demonstrates that based on data from available observational clinical studies, CABG can be performed with acceptable operative mortality and 5-year actuarial survival in patients with severe LV dysfunction.

The influence of a low ejection fraction on long-term survival in systematic off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE

Poor left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a recognized operative and long-term risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery. Over the past decade, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery has emerged as a new strategy to address myocardial revascularization in poor left-ventricular EF patients, but few reports have documented long-term results. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term clinical results in off-pump coronary artery bypass patients with ≤ 35% left-ventricular EF.

METHODS

From September 1996 to May 2006, 1250 patients underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass revascularization, and were prospectively followed-up at the Montreal Heart Institute. Among them, 137 patients (pts) had a preoperative left-ventricular EF ≤ 35%. Follow-up was completed in 97% of patients.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 66 ± 34 months. Rate of grafts per pts was comparable in both groups. Overall 30-day mortality was 1.7% (1.5% EF >35% pts vs 2.9% in EF ≤ 35% pts; p = 0.19). Ten-year survival was lower in poor EF patients (44 ± 7% vs 76 ± 2%), and remained significant even after adjusting for risk factors (p = 0.04). Freedom from cardiac death for both groups was also significantly reduced in poor EF patients (p = 0.008). After adjustment, freedom from the combined end point of cardiac or sudden death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, unstable angina, and cardiac failure was comparable in both groups (p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery can be performed adequately and safely in poor EF patients. However, overall and cardiac survival was decreased in this subset of patients with a comparable freedom from major cardiac adverse related events.

Risk of adverse events after coronary artery bypass graft and subsequent noncardiac surgery

Aims: Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) are increasingly performed in elderly patients. Risk factors and outcomes are poorly described for those undergoing noncardiac surgery within 1 year after CABG. Our objectives were to assess the risk and predictors of major adverse events associated with noncardiac surgery within 1 year after CABG. Methods: In a retrospective review of medical records at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA), over a period of 5 years, we identified patients who underwent noncardiac procedures within 1 year post-CABG. All events that occurred within 30 days after noncardiac surgery and deaths within 1 year after noncardiac surgery were considered to be related to CABG. Results: We identified 211 patients; of these, 21 patients had 24 adverse events. Within 1 year, 11 died, and within the first 30 days, three myocardial infarctions, six acute congestive heart failure episodes, three cerebrovascular accidents and one deep vein thrombosis episode had occurred. Predictors of an adverse event included emergency operation (odds ratio: 6.8), ejection fraction less than 45% (p < 0.001) and elevated right ventricular systolic pressure by 40 mmHg or more (p = 0.03). After the noncardiac procedure, patients requiring dialysis (p = 0.02), ventilatory support (p = 0.03) and longer hospital stay (p = 0.03) had greater rates of adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Post-CABG, preoperative ejection fraction less than 45%, right ventricular systolic pressure of 40 mmHg or more, as well as emergent noncardiac surgery, were predictors of adverse outcomes after the noncardiac procedure. Longer postoperative hospital stay, dialysis, as well as ventilatory support, were predictors of adverse outcomes after CABG.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in selected patients is superior to the conventional approach for patients with severely depressed left ventricular function

OBJECTIVES

Patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction have high mortality when kept in clinical treatment. Coronary artery bypass grafting can improve survival and the quality of life. Recently, revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass has been presented as a viable alternative. The aim of this study is to compare patients with left ventricular ejection fractions of less than 20% who underwent coronary artery bypass graft with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

From January 2001 to December 2005, 217 nonrandomized, consecutive, and nonselected patients with an ejection fraction less than or equal to 20% underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery with (112) or without (off-pump) (105) the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. We studied demographic, operative, and postoperative data.

RESULTS

There were no demographic differences between groups. The outcome variables showed similar graft numbers in both groups. Mortality was 12.5% in the cardiopulmonary bypass group and 3.8% in the off-pump group. Postoperative complications were statistically different (cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump): total length of hospital stay (days)-11.3 vs. 7.2, length of ICU stay (days)-3.7 vs. 2.1, pulmonary complications-10.7% vs. 2.8%, intubation time (hours)-22 vs. 10, postoperative bleeding (mL)-654 vs. 440, acute renal failure-8.9% vs. 1.9% and left-ventricle ejection fraction before discharge-22% vs. 29%.

CONCLUSION

Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction is valid and safe and promotes less mortality and morbidity compared with conventional operations.

Beating heart continuous coronary perfusion for valve surgery: what next for clinical trials?

Prior to the introduction of cardioplegia, beating heart continuous coronary perfusion (BHCCP) was the only available method of myocardial protection. Currently, cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest is the gold standard strategy. Cardioplegic arrest provides an easier and safer way to operate on a still heart. It enables the performance of a broader range of cardiac procedures, and avoids the potential difficulties of continuous perfusion on a beating heart. Despite the overall effectiveness and safety of cardioplegia, some adverse effects remain, mainly due to the insult of ischemia, which results in ischemic reperfusion injury. As a result BHCCP has seen a revival as an alternative to cardioplegia for performing complex valvular surgery. Increasing experience reporting safety and efficacy of BHCCP is being published. However, despite the reported advantages, current available evidence validating safety and efficacy of BHCCP is controversial. This article provides an overview of BHCCP highlighting the current best available evidence supporting this strategy, concerns, controversies and potential areas for further research.

Results of percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease according to left ventricular systolic function

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to appraise the early and long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with unprotected left main disease (ULM) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVD).

BACKGROUND

PCI with DES has being performed with increasing frequency in subjects with ULM and LVD, but few specific data are available.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

We identified patients undergoing PCI with DES for ULM at our Center and distinguished those with ejection fraction (EF) >50% from those with 40% <EF <or=50% and those with EF <or=40%. The primary end-point was the rate of major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE, ie death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, repeat PCI or bypass surgery).

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were included, 57.4% with EF >50%, 32.0% with 40% <EF <or=50%, and 10.6% with EF <or=40%. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in those with EF <or=40% (9.5% vs. 0 and 3.2%, P < 0.001). A total of 96% patients were followed for 23 +/- 14 months, yielding a MACCE rate of 44.2% (41.6% in those with EF >50%, 41.6% in those with 40% <EF <or=50%, and 61.9% in those with EF <or=40%, P = 0.4). Specifically, death occurred in 2.7%, 7.9%, and 28.6% (P < 0.001), cardiac death in 1.8%, 4.8%, and 23.8% (P = 0.001), MI in 8.0%, 7.9% and 0 (P = 0.4), and TVR in 15.9%, 11.1% and 33.3% (P = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Systolic ventricular dysfunction is highly correlated with in-hospital and long term death rates in patients undergoing PCI with DES for ULM disease. However it does not confer an increased risk of nonfatal adverse events or stent thrombosis.

Preoperative ejection fraction as a predictor of survival after coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison with a matched general population

BACKGROUND

Preoperative left ventricular dysfunction is an established risk factor for early and late mortality after revascularization. This retrospective analysis demonstrates the effects of preoperative ejection fraction on the short-term and long-term survival of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

Early and late mortality were determined retrospectively in 10 626 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary bypass between January 1998 and December 2007. The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to their preoperative ejection fraction. Expected survival was estimated by comparison with a general Dutch population group described in the database of the Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics. For each of our groups with a known preoperative ejection fraction, a general Dutch population group was matched for age, sex, and year of operation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

One hundred twenty-two patients were lost to follow-up. In 219 patients, the preoperative ejection fraction could not be retrieved. In the remaining patients (n = 10 285), the results of multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analysis identified the ejection fraction as a predictor of early and late mortality. When we compared long-term survival and expected survival, we found a relatively poorer outcome in all subjects with an ejection fraction of < 50%. In subjects with a preoperative ejection fraction of > 50%, long-term survival exceeded expected survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of left ventricular dysfunction was associated with poor survival. Compared with the survival of the matched general population, our coronary bypass patients had a worse outcome only if their preoperative ejection fraction was < 50%.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Our aim was to examine hospital outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction, with regard to the surgical technique (off- or on-pump). Between March 2007 and March 2008, 689 consecutive patients underwent isolated first-time coronary artery bypass; 127 had ejection fractions ≤30% (group 1) and 562 had ejection fractions >30% (group 2). Data of preoperative risk profiles and hospital outcomes were collected prospectively. Off-pump operations were performed in 49 (38.6%) patients in group 1 and 196 (34.9%) in group 2. The incidences of infectious, neurologic, and cardiac complications postoperatively were significantly higher in group 1. In multivariate analysis, preoperative ejection fraction ≤30% was found to be an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and hospital mortality. The subgroup of patients undergoing off-pump surgery in both groups had a significantly lower rate of total complications than those undergoing conventional on-pump operations, but no significant difference in mortality was observed between those undergoing off-pump or conventional surgery in either group. Off-pump surgery helped to limit the increased morbidity rate after coronary bypass in patients with ventricular dysfunction.

Is severely left ventricular dysfunction a predictor of early outcomes in patients with coronary artery bypass graft?

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, the Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery outcomes of patients with low ejection fraction (EF) have been worse compared to patients with moderate to good left ventricular function. During the past decade, despite improvements in surgical techniques, the trend in the outcomes of these patients remained unclear.

AIM

We sought to determine the effect of left ventricular dysfunction on early mortality and morbidity and to specify predictors of early mortality of isolated CABG in a large group of patients EF≤35%.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed data of 14 819 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG from February 2002 to March 2008 at Tehran Heart Center. Patients were divided into two groups based on their LVEF (EF≤35% and EF>35%). Differences in case-mix between patients with EF≤35% and those without were controlled by constructing a propensity score.

RESULTS

Mean age of our patients was 58.7±9.5 years. EF≤35% was present in 1342 (9.1%) of patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly increased univariate in EF≤35%, while this association diminished after confounders were adjusted for by using the propensity score (p=0.242). Following adjustment it was demonstrated that renal failure, cardiac arrest, heart block, infectious complication, total ventilation time, and total ICU hours were more frequent in patients with EF≤35%.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated EF≤35% was not predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients underwent CABG. Careful preoperative patient selection remains essential in patients with EF≤35% undergoing CABG.

Off-pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in Patients with Low Ejection Fraction

Objective

Long-term survival after off-pump surgery in patients with low ejection fraction was investigated.

Methods

Three hundred forty-six patients with ejection fraction 30% or less with isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) were compared with a propensity matched historical group operated on-pump (ONCAB) and with data from literature after percutaneous coronary intervention and OPCAB surgery.

Results

The lower invasiveness of OPCAB contributed to a significantly better 30-day survival, shorter postoperative length of stay, and fewer in-hospital complications. Incomplete revascularization of the posterior and lateral territories of the heart correlated with higher 1-year mortality. The probability of survival for 8 years after OPCAB was 50.1% (n = 76) versus 49.7% (n = 82) for ONCAB without comparable data from literature for OPCAB or percutaneous coronary intervention in these high-risk patients.

Conclusions

OPCAB surgery in patients with low ejection fraction is a viable alternative but so far without demonstrable long-term survival advantage to ONCAB.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass in severe left ventricular dysfunction

The outcome of multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in cases of severe left ventricular dysfunction was studied in 58 consecutive patients with ejection fraction < or =35% who were followed up for a median of 15 months. Patients with ejection fractions < or =25% (group 1) had the largest left ventricular dimensions preoperatively, with gradual increases during follow-up; those with ejection fractions of 26%-35% (group 2) had smaller preoperative ventricular dimensions, with left ventricular regression postoperatively. There was more improvement in ejection fraction in group 2 than group 1 (33% vs. 10%). Mitral regurgitation improved from moderate to mild in group 2; whereas in group 1, mild mitral regurgitation progressed to moderate or severe during follow-up. Ejection fraction was a predictor of more frequent use of intraaortic balloon pumping, longer duration of inotropic use, a higher mean pulmonary artery-to-systemic arterial pressure ratio, and increased postoperative drainage.

Survival after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The number of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) continues to increase. The aim of this study was to document the long-term survival in this group.

METHODS

The 30-day mortality and long-term survival outcome of 162 patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF [< or = 30%]) who had consecutive isolated CABG between 1996 and 2005 were compared with 661 patients who had impaired LVEF (31% to 59%) and 1,231 patients with normal LVEF (> or = 60%).

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality for patients with severely depressed LVEF was 5.6%. The median survival for deceased patients was 3.4 years (interquartile range, 1.3 to 5.9). The risk of all-cause mortality attributable to severe left ventricular dysfunction was increased twofold compared with having normal LVEF (hazard ratio = 2.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.64 to 3.18; p < 0.001). Among the covariates, older age, emergency surgery, mitral incompetence, smoking history, respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, intensive care unit intubation for 24 hours or more, postoperative renal failure, postoperative pleural effusion, and nonuse of left internal mammary artery were detected as significant predictors of increased mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate among CABG patients with severely depressed LVEF was comparable to that reported in other series. Severe left ventricular dysfunction carried more than a twofold increased mortality risk compared with patients who had an impaired LVEF, adjusted for traditional risk factors. These data suggest that LVEF has an impact on long-term patient survival even after preoperative covariates and postoperative morbidity outcomes are considered.

Surgical coronary revascularization in severe left ventricular dysfunction

Surgical revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction is a common practice and poses a surgical challenge. From September 2002 to May 2004, 50 patients (47 men and 3 women; mean age, 59 +/- 9 years) with a mean preoperative ejection fraction of 19.7% +/- 3.2% underwent surgical revascularization. The mean EuroSCORE was 7.2 +/- 3.4. Indications for surgery were congestive heart failure in 8 patients (16%), angina in 20 (40%), ventricular arrhythmias in 4 (8%), and critical left main stem disease in 12 (24%). Twenty-two patients (44%) had emergency surgery for critical anatomy and unstable symptoms. The number of grafts per patient was 3.7 +/- 0.8. Seventeen patients (34%) required intra-aortic balloon pump support, 16 (32%) needed pacing, and 48 (96%) had inotropic support postoperatively. Morbidity included re-operation for bleeding (2%), acute renal failure (10%), hemodialysis (4%), and fatal multiorgan failure (4%). Postoperative (4.9 +/- 3.7 months) 2-dimentional echocardiography was available in 18 patients of whom 11 (61%) showed improved left ventricular function (range, 5% to 45%). Thirty-day hospital mortality was 8%. These data indicate that surgical revascularization can be performed safely with acceptable hospital mortality in high-risk patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Early and mid-term impacts of cardiopulmonary bypass on coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction: a propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass may exacerbate myocardial damage in compromised left ventricles. Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG) were compared in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction, using an analysis of a propensity score matching.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between December 2000 and November 2005, 1,473 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in our institute and 153 patients who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 35% were enrolled. The OPCAB group contained 100 patients and the On-pump CABG group contained 53 patients. Preoperative risk factors were compared and 50 patients in each group were matched. The mean follow-up time was 35.5+/-17.3 months. Three deaths (3.0%) occurred in the matched cohort, with no significant difference between 2 groups. The operation time, ventilation time, intensive care unit admission time and occurrence of respiratory failure were significantly lower in the OPCAB group. The mean LVEF of the 2 groups improved significantly. The overall 6-year actuarial survival rates of the OPCAB and On-pump CABG group were 88.2% and 72.4% (p=0.2), respectively, and there were no significant differences in 6-year rates of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p=0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with poor left ventricular dysfunction improved myocardial function. Postoperative respiratory failure was significantly related to the cardiopulmonary bypass for surgical myocardial revascularization. Off-pump and On-pump surgical revascularization resulted in equivalent mid-term outcomes.

Long-term survival and functional recovery after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction has been considered to be a challenging operation. We assessed the early angiographic and long-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients with poor left ventricular function who underwent isolated CABG.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 78 patients with a poor left ventricular ejection fraction (35% or less) who underwent isolated CABG between January 1991 and November 2006. The mean age of the patients was 66.1+/-9.4 years, and their mean New York Heart Association functional class was 3.1+/-0.8. Their mean end-diastolic left ventricular diameter was 57.4+/-8.1 mm, and their mean grade of mitral regurgitation was 0.7+/-1.0. Early postoperative angiograms were performed at 32.5+/-33.5 days after the operation. Interval echocardiographic data were analyzed, and the long-term survival rate was evaluated.

RESULTS

The average number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.2 +/-1.1. The operative mortality rate was 7.7%. Stroke occurred in 1.3% of patients. The overall patency rates for arterial and venous grafts were 100% and 97.2%, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from 28.2%+/-5.1% to 34.4%+/-8.4%. Both the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular dimensions significantly decreased from 57.4+/-8.1 to 55.1+/-8.8 mm and from 47.4+/-8.4 to 45.1+/-9.7, re spectively. The actuarial patient survival rate at 10 years was 73.1%.

CONCLUSION

CABG in patients with left ventricular dysfunction was effective, with favorable early graft patency rates. The long-term outcome was also acceptable, with echocardiographic functional recovery.

Results and predictors of early and late outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a well-accepted therapeutic approach in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease and severely depressed left ventricular function. However, the potential impact of off-pump CABG in this group of patients remains unknown. In addition, there are only scarce data regarding long-term survival and its predictors in this patient population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of 2,725 consecutive patients (mean age, 65 +/- 11 years; 843 (31%) female) undergoing CABG between January 1998 and December 2005 (ejection fraction [EF] < or = 0.30; n = 495, 18%). Outcome measures included hospital mortality, major complications, and long-term survival. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of hospital mortality and late survival. Subgroup analysis for patients with EF less than or equal to 0.30 undergoing conventional CABG (n = 424, 86%) versus off-pump CABG (n = 71, 14%) was performed.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 1.8% (EF < or = 0.30, 3.6%; EF > 0.30, 1.4%; p = 0.002). Off-pump CABG did not have an impact on operative mortality (on-pump, 4%; off-pump, 3%; p = 0.509). Ejection fraction of 0.30 or less was not an independent risk factor of hospital mortality but predicted respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR] = 2.3) and sepsis (OR, 1.4). Long-term survival was significantly decreased in patients with EF of 0.30 or less: 1-year and 5-year survival 88% +/- 1.5% and 75% +/- 2.2% versus 96% +/- 0.4% and 81% +/- 1.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). Reoperation (OR, 6.9), peripheral vascular disease (OR, 3.2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 3.0), congestive heart failure (OR, 2.7), and female sex (OR, 2.1) were independent predictors of long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent results after CABG can be expected in patients with EF of 0.30 or less, with minimal increase in mortality and acceptable postoperative morbidity. Long-term survival remains limited, but recent results are substantially better than historical reports. Careful preoperative patient selection and perioperative management are essential in these patients undergoing CABG.

Revascularization in Heart Failure: Coronary Bypass or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of heart failure in Western countries. Selected patients who have low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and CAD clearly benefit from coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG results seem to be superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the few comparative studies of the two approaches in patients who have CAD and low LVEF completed to date. Clinical improvement should be expected in most patients who undergo CABG. This is important for patients who have a limited life span that they could spend with a good functional status rather than being hospitalized for multiple repeat PCIs or symptomatic deterioration.

Early and midterm outcome after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define the early outcome and the potential for midterm survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) who undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and to compare these results with those of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Medical records of patients with LVD (n = 732) between January 1998 and March 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 523 patients with moderate LVD (ejection fraction, 30%-50%; 463 CABG versus 60 OPCAB) and 209 patients with severe LVD (ejection fraction, < 30%; 136 CABG versus 73 OPCAB). Midterm survival data (mean follow-up, 2.3 years) were obtained from the National Death Index. Groups were compared by multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted.

RESULTS

CABG patients had lower European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation values (5.3 versus 7.2 and 8.0 versus 9.6 in moderate and severe LVD subgroups, respectively; P < .001). There were no differences (OPCAB versus CABG) in 30-day mortality (3.3% versus 1.9%, moderate LVD group, P = .366; 6.8% versus 4.4%, severe LVD group, P = .521), length of stay (9.3 versus 8.6 days, moderate LVD group, P = .683; 11.9 versus 11.8 days, severe LVD group, P = .423), and postoperative complications (13.3% versus 11.0%, moderate LVD group, P = 0.663; 16.4% versus 20.6%, severe LVD group, P = .581). Successful coronary bypass in patients with severe LVD was associated with 68.2% and 66.2% actuarial 48-month survival rates for the CABG and OPCAB patients, respectively (P = .336), and these rates rose to 86.0% and 82.9% in patients with moderate LVD (P = .121). When CABG patients with moderate LVD were considered the reference group, the adjusted hazard ratio of OPCAB patients with moderate LVD for midterm mortality was 1.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-2.87; P = .481). CABG and OPCAB patients with severe LVD had the same adjusted hazard ratio of 1.86, and this figure was statistically significant compared with the value for the reference group (P = .011 and P = .039, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LVD can derive midterm benefit from coronary bypass. OPCAB in higher-risk patients had early and midterm outcomes similar to those of CABG.