Medications Used in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Effects of Different Doses of Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone on the Serum Lipoprotein Profile in Healthy Subjects

Adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) at pharmacological dosage has marked lipid-lowering effects that may have therapeutic implications. The rationale behind the present investigation was the possible use of ACTH as a lipid-lowering replacement for steroids. Thirty-two healthy individuals were randomly divided into four groups of 8 each. Three ACTH groups received different doses of ACTH(1-24) intramuscularly (0.1 mg, 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg daily for four days) and the control group received NaCl 0.9% 1 ml intramuscularly daily for four days. Moreover, 8 healthy subjects were given ACTH(1-24) 1.0 mg intramuscularly five times at an interval of four days. Blood and urine samples were collected at regular intervals. ACTH treatment at the dose of 1.0 mg daily lowered the serum concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein B by 28% and 22%, respectively, which is similar to previous observations. ACTH treatment at the doses of 0.5 mg and 0.1 mg gave smaller reductions (17% and 12%, and 9% and 8%, respectively) resulting in near linear dose-response relationships. There were no changes in the control group. Only the ACTH dose of 1.0 mg resulted in significant changes when compared with the control group. During the ACTH administration at four-days intervals, the serum concentrations of LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B reached the lowest values at 48 hr after an injection, remained there at 72 hr but were rising again at 96 hr. For effective lipid reduction, an ACTH dose of about 1 mg is needed and it should be given more often than every fourth day, probably every second or third day. With regard to the cortisol exposure, the results should be viewed in the light of calculations, presented in the paper, that 1 mg of ACTH is equivalent to 90 mg of cortisol administered parenterally.

Corticosteroids and Multiple Sclerosis: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Although a rare disease, multiple sclerosis (MS) has a high prevalence rate in Canada and affects many Canadians and their families. An autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, it results in the destruction of the myelin sheath that surrounds the nerve axons. High-dose IV steroid therapy is often used to treat an acute exacerbation in MS. Steroids have immunosuppressant effects that work to decrease the autoimmune pathology component of the disease and to reduce the inflammation around the nerve axon, thereby promoting closer contact of the damaged myelin and subsequently partially restoring adequate electrical nerve conduction to reduce symptoms.

The high prevalence rate of MS in Canada makes it vital for pharmacists to become more aware of the different aspects of the disease and how these relate to therapy. The pharmacist should be aware of the adverse effects and impact of high-dose IV steroids in MS patients. The purpose of this review is threefold: 1) to provide a better understanding of MS pathology; 2) to contribute a systematic review of steroids; and 3) to assist in the clinical decision-making process and in the counselling requirements for patients on high-dose steroids.

The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population

BACKGROUND

The broad topic of research ethics is one which has been relatively well-investigated and discussed. Unique ethical issues have been identified for such populations as pediatrics, where the issues of consent and assent have received much attention, and obstetrics, with concerns such as the potential for research to cause harm to the fetus. However, little has been written about ethical concerns which are relatively unique to the population of patients seen by the practitioner of rehabilitation medicine.

DISCUSSION

This paper reviews unique ethical concerns in conducting research in this population, including decision-making capacity, communication, the potential for subject overuse, the timing of recruitment, hope for a cure and therapeutic misconception and the nature of the health care provider-research subject relationship.

SUMMARY

Researchers in the area of rehabilitation medicine should be aware of some of the unique ethical challenges posed by this patient population and should take steps to address any potential concerns in order to optimize subject safety and ensure that studies meet current ethical guidelines and standards.