Effect of aspirin in coronary artery bypass grafting

Viscoelastic Testing Methods

Viscoelastic testing methods examine the real-time formation of a clot in a whole blood sample, and include thromboelastography (TEG), rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), and several other testing platforms. They allow for concurrent assessment of multiple aspects of clotting, including plasmatic coagulation factors, platelets, fibrinogen, and the fibrinolytic pathway. This testing is rapid and may be performed at the point-of-care, allowing for prompt identification of coagulopathies to guide focused and rational administration of blood products as well as the identification of anticoagulant effect. With recent industry progression towards user-friendly, cartridge-based, portable instruments, viscoelastic testing has emerged in the 21st century as a powerful tool to guide blood transfusions in the bleeding patient, and to identify and treat both bleeding and thrombotic conditions in many operative settings, including trauma surgery, liver transplant surgery, cardiac surgery, and obstetrics. In these settings, the use of transfusion algorithms guided by viscoelastic testing data has resulted in widespread improvements in patient blood management as well as modest improvements in select patient outcomes. To address the increasingly wide adoption of viscoelastic methods and the growing number of medical and laboratory personnel tasked with implementing, performing, and interpreting these methods, this chapter provides an overview of the history, physiology, and technology behind viscoelastic testing, as well as a practical review of its clinical utility and current evidence supporting its use. Also included is a review of testing limitations and the contextual role played by viscoelastic methods among all coagulation laboratory testing.

Effect of Preoperative Continuation of Aspirin on Postoperative Bleeding After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Despite ample evidence of continuing preoperative aspirin to improve coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes, practice for the routine continuation of preoperative aspirin is inconsistent due to concern for increased postoperative bleeding. The purpose of this study was to investigate preoperative aspirin use and its effect on postoperative bleeding after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

Methodology

This cohort study involved patients (n = 74) who underwent OPCABG at a single center between August 2017 and January 2018. After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients were divided into two groups: one (n = 37) received tablet aspirin 75 mg till the day of the surgery, and for the other group (n = 37) aspirin was stopped five days before the surgery. Postoperative bleeding was recorded in both groups. After considering preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, statistical analysis was performed.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups concerning peroperative and postoperative variables. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in chest tube drainage at one, two, three, twenty-four, forty-eight, and seventy-two hours (p = 0.845, 0.126, 0.568, 0.478, 0.342, and 0.717, respectively). No significant difference was seen in the transfusion requirement of blood and fresh frozen plasma (FFP).

Conclusions

Continuation of preoperative aspirin till the day of the surgery is neither associated with an increase in chest tube drainage, reoperation for bleeding complications nor transfusion of blood and FFP.

Viscoelastic testing in cardiac surgery

Bleeding complications are common in cardiac surgery and lead to an increase in morbidity and mortality. This is multifactorial in aetiology including the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass, the drugs given to manipulate the coagulation system and the vascular nature of the surgery itself. Viscoelastic tests provide a point of care, rapid assessment of coagulation which offer the advantage of faster turnaround times and a nuanced view of the elements of the coagulation system allowing targeted therapy to be delivered quickly. Both thomboelastography (TEG)and thromboelastometry (ROTEM) have been recommended for use in cardiac surgery, both have shown a reduction in transfusion and bleeding when used as part of a testing algorithm. They are particularly useful in assessing residual heparinisation and fibrinogen levels. Additionally, TEG allows the evaluation of the effects of anti-platelet agents on platelet function. This review discusses the mechanisms by which bleeding occurs in cardiac surgery and explores three uses of viscoelastic testing in cardiac surgery: to predict bleeding, to assess platelet function and peri-operative testing to reduce transfusion.

Use of aspirin and bleeding-related complications after hepatic resection

Background

The operative risk of hepatectomy under antiplatelet therapy is unknown. This study sought to assess the outcomes of elective hepatectomy performed with or without aspirin continuation in a well balanced matched cohort.

Methods

Data were retrieved from a multicentre prospective observational study. Aspirin and control groups were compared by non-standardized methods and by propensity score (PS) matching analysis. The main outcome was severe (Dindo–Clavien grade IIIa or more) haemorrhage. Other outcomes analysed were intraoperative transfusion, overall haemorrhage, major morbidity, comprehensive complication index (CCI) score, thromboembolic complications, ischaemic complications and mortality.

Results

Before matching, there were 118 patients in the aspirin group and 1685 in the control group. ASA fitness grade, cardiovascular disease, previous history of angina pectoris, angioplasty, diabetes, use of vitamin K antagonists, cirrhosis and type of hepatectomy were significantly different between the groups. After PS matching, 108 patients were included in each group. There were no statistically significant differences between the aspirin and control groups in severe haemorrhage (6·5 versus 5·6 per cent respectively; odds ratio (OR) 1·18, 95 per cent c.i. 0·38 to 3·62), intraoperative transfusion (23·4 versus 23·7 per cent; OR 0·98, 0·51 to 1·87), overall haemorrhage (10·2 versus 12·0 per cent; OR 0·83, 0·35 to 1·94), CCI score (24 versus 28; P = 0·520), major complications (23·1 versus 13·9 per cent; OR 1·82, 0·92 to 3·79) and 90-day mortality (5·6 versus 4·6 per cent; OR 1·21, 0·36 to 4·09).

Conclusion

This observational study suggested that aspirin continuation is not associated with a higher rate of bleeding-related complications after elective hepatic surgery.

Comparison of preoperative continuation and discontinuation of aspirin in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative discontinuation of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) can reduce bleeding risk but may increase the risk of perioperative cardiovascular events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the impact of preoperative continuation versus discontinuation of aspirin compared with a control group in a cohort of 739 consecutive patients undergoing total hip (THA) (n = 396) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 343) at a tertiary hospital. Bleeding risk, local complications, orthopaedic outcome, and cardiac and cerebral complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-five patients did not receive antithrombotic or full-dose anticoagulant medication, 175 patients were taking low-dose aspirin, 99 vitamin K antagonists, clopidogrel, or a combination of these drugs. Of the patients taking aspirin, 139 discontinued and 36 continued aspirin. Blood loss and local bleeding complications were comparable in these two groups. TKA patients who continued aspirin more frequently showed marked knee swelling after 1 week than those discontinuing aspirin (35.1 vs. 81.3 %; p = 0.001). However, orthopaedic outcome did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was a trend towards an increased risk of cardiac complications in patients who discontinued aspirin (6.5 vs. 0.0 %; p = 0.107).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuation or discontinuation of aspirin did not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of relevant perioperative bleeding complications in our study. Continuation of aspirin was associated with a transitory increase in knee swelling, but had no effect on orthopaedic outcome. Continuation of aspirin may be associated with a favourable perioperative cardiac outcome. Our data support perioperative continuation of aspirin intake in patients undergoing THA or TKA.

Open and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy in men receiving ongoing low-dose aspirin medication: revisiting an old paradigm?

OBJECTIVE

To assess blood loss, transfusion rates and 90-day complication rates in patients receiving ongoing 100 mg/day aspirin medication and undergoing open radical prostatectomy (RP) or robot-assisted RP (RARP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2010 and August 2011, 2061 open RPs and 400 RARPs were performed. All patients received low-molecular-weight heparin for thrombembolism prophylaxis. Aspirin intake during surgery was recorded in 137 patients (5.5%). Descriptive statistics and multivariable analyses after propensity-score matching for balancing potential differences in patients with and without aspirin medication were used to assess the risk of blood loss above the median in patients undergoing open RP or RARP.

RESULTS

The median blood loss in the open RP cohort with and without aspirin medication was 750 and 700 mL, respectively, and in the RARP cohort it was 200 and 150 mL, respectively. Within the same cohorts, transfusions were administered in 21 and 8% and 0 and 1% of patients, respectively. The 90-day complication rates in patients with ongoing aspirin medication were 5.8, 4.4, 7.3 and 0% for Clavien grades I, II, III and IV complications, respectively. In multivariable analyses and after propensity-score matching, prostate volume (odds ratio 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04; P < 0.01) but not ongoing aspirin medication achieved independent predictor status for the risk of blood loss above the median.

CONCLUSIONS

Major surgery such as open RP and RARP can be safely performed in patients with ongoing aspirin medication without greater blood loss. Higher 90-day complication rates were not detected in such patients. Differences in transfusion rates between the groups receiving and not receiving ongoing aspirin medication may be explained by a higher proportion of patients with coronary artery disease in the group receiving ongoing aspirin medication. This comorbidity may result in a higher peri-operative threshold for allogenic blood transfusion.

Assessment of common nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications by whole blood aggregometry: a clinical evaluation for the perioperative setting

OBJECTIVE

To help define the perioperative risk related to commonly used non-aspirin NSAIDs with whole blood platelet aggregometry.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers were recruited. Two cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 inhibitors (ibuprofen and naproxen) and two COX-2 inhibitors (meloxicam and celecoxib) were administered, and daily whole blood platelet aggregometry studies were obtained until studies showed no platelet inhibition. Aspirin was studied at the conclusion of the study.

RESULTS

Ibuprofen had no inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation in all women and no inhibitory effect in 83% of men at 24 hours. All platelet function had returned to normal at 48 hours. The inhibitory effect of naproxen on platelets was absent at 48 hours in 83% of the women and 50% of men. By 72 hours all platelet studies had returned to normal. Meloxicam and celecoxib did not cause any overall inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibuprofen and naproxen have a mild inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation compared with aspirin and this effect is undetectable by 48 hours and 72 hours, respectively. Meloxicam and celecoxib show essentially no inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation. These findings suggest that there is little bleeding risk related to platelet aggregation at 24 hours in patients who take COX-2 inhibitors and at 72 hours for those who take COX-1 inhibitor medications.

Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Preoperative Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background:

The administration of aspirin is traditionally discontinued prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), given a potential risk of excessive postoperative bleeding. Few studies have previously suggested the benefits of continuing aspirin until the time of surgery. The primary aim of this review is to evaluate the effects of preoperative aspirin therapy on several clinically important outcomes in patients undergoing CABG.

Methods:

A meta-analysis of eligible studies of patients undergoing CABG, reporting preoperative aspirin in comparison with no aspirin/placebo and our outcomes, was carried out. The safety outcomes included postoperative bleeding, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirements, and reoperation for bleeding. The efficacy outcomes included perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), and mortality.

Results:

In 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n = 1538), preoperative aspirin increased postoperative bleeding (difference in means = 132.30 mL; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 47.10-217.51; P = .002), PRBC transfusion requirements (difference in means = 0.67 units; 95% CI 0.10-1.24; P = .02), and reoperation for bleeding (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76; 95% CI 1.05-2.93; P = .03). In 19 observational studies (n = 19551), preoperative aspirin increased postoperative bleeding (difference in means = 132.74 mL; 95% CI 45.77-219.72; P = .003) and PRBC transfusion requirements (difference in means = 0.19 units; 95% CI 0.02-0.35; P = .02) but not reoperation for bleeding (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 0.91-1.42; P = .27). Subgroup analyses for RCTs demonstrated that aspirin given at doses ≤ 100 mg/d might not increase the postoperative bleeding, and the dose of 325 mg/d might not be a cutoff value that has clinical and statistical significance. No statistically significant differences in the rate of perioperative MI, CVAs, or mortality were seen between the 2 groups.

Conclusions:

Preoperative aspirin therapy is associated with increased postoperative bleeding, PRBC transfusion requirements, and reoperation for bleeding in patients undergoing CABG. Doses lower than 100 mg/d may minimize the risk of bleeding. Additional RCTs are needed to assess the effects of preoperative aspirin on the safety and efficacy outcomes in patients undergoing CABG.

Perioperative management of antiplatelet-drugs in cardiac surgery

The management of coronary patients scheduled for a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs, is plenty of controversies. It has been shown that withdrawal of antiplatelet drugs is associated with an increased risk of a thrombotic event, but surgery under an altered platelet function also means an increased risk of bleeding in the perioperative period. Because of the conflict recommendations, this review article tries to evaluate the outcome of different perioperative antiplatelet protocols in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing CABG.

Critical Overview on the Benefits and Harms of Aspirin

Aspirin is widely used internationally for a variety of indications, with the most prominent one being that of cardiovascular disease. However, aspirin has also been proposed as a treatment option in a diverse range of conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cancer prevention, and obstetrics. In our overview, we critically appraise the current evidence from recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering the benefits of aspirin across these conditions. We also look at evidence that some patients may not derive benefit due to the concept of aspirin resistance. Aspirin is also associated with the potential for significant harm, principally from haemorrhagic adverse events. We critically appraise the threat of haemorrhagic complications, and weigh up these risks against that of any potential benefit.

Acute ischemic syndromes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, performed for the control of angina pectoris, leads to postoperative relief from symptoms in most patients. Amelioration of ischemia and improvement in exercise capacity after CABG are well documented. However, patients currently undergoing CABG are more complex than in the past--they are older and are maintained on medical therapy for longer periods. A large number of these patients have had one or more previous myocardial revascularization procedures. The post-operative period would appear to be a time of vulnerability for coronary events. However, previous investigators have focused on the pre- and intraoperative aspects of peri-CABG ischemia. Outcome data suggest that the postoperative interval is at least equally important as a determinant of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. We discuss the epidemiology, etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of ischemic syndromes in the postoperative period after CABG. In addition, we review recent data from a series of 14 patients, observed at our institution, who underwent cardiac catheterization and, in some cases, angioplasty of the culprit vessel in the immediate postoperative period.

Does the Use of Preoperative Aspirin Increase the Risk of Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The traditional recommendation has been to stop Aspirin seven to 10 days prior to coronary artery bypass surgery to reduce the potential risk of bleeding. A few reports have shown that Aspirin did not increase the risk of bleeding and may be beneficial to be continued until the time of surgery. The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of preoperative Aspirin on bleeding in patients undergoing elective bypass surgery.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 10 randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting comparisons between Aspirin and control was undertaken. The primary outcome was the total amount of postoperative chest tube drainage. Secondary outcomes were the number of units of packed red blood cell transfusion, platelet transfusion, fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and number of patients reexplored for bleeding.

RESULTS

Ten studies, involving 1748 patients, met the inclusion criteria for this review of whom 913 were in the Aspirin group and 835 were in the control group. Pooling the results of all studies showed a significant increase in blood loss and transfusion of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma in the Aspirin group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of platelet transfusion, or the incidence of reexploration (p > 0.05). Included studies were heterogeneous and of low methodological quality.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin is associated with increased chest tube drainage and may be associated with a greater requirement for blood products. High-quality prospective studies are warranted to reassess the effect of Aspirin on important postoperative outcomes.

Discontinuation of perioperative antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in stroke patients

Growing evidence suggests that perioperative withdrawal of ASA for secondary stroke prevention increases thromboembolic risk without the associated benefit of decreased bleeding complications. ASA maintenance is acceptable in many procedures, including invasive ones. Many procedures, in particular ophthalmologic, dermatologic, and dental surgeries, also are safe while continuing oral AC. Warfarin has been continued successfully even in some surgeries that have high bleeding risk. When the risk is too high, temporary bridging therapy with LWMH is safe in many populations. Although the exact thromboembolic risks associated with temporary cessation of AP and AC are unknown and likely low, morbidity and mortality associated with thromboembolism are high. Further studies investigating the risks and benefits of maintaining AP and AC during procedures, particularly invasive ones, are needed. Meanwhile, it is critical that physicians understand the risks and benefits of perioperative AP and AC and the variety of procedures in which these agents can be safely continued.

Low-dose aspirin before spinal surgery: results of a survey among neurosurgeons in Germany

The main problem faced by the increasing numbers of patients presenting for spinal surgery are receiving concurrent medication with low-dose aspirin, leading to dysfunctional circulating platelets. The contribution of low-dose aspirin to increased peri-operative risk of bleeding and blood loss is a contentious issue with conflicting published results from different surgical groups. Data from neurosurgical spine patients is sparse, but aspirin has been identified as an important risk factor in the development of post-operative hematoma following intracranial surgery. We surveyed the opinions and working practices of the neurosurgical facilities performing spinal operations in Germany regarding patients who present for elective spinal surgery. Identical questionnaires were sent to 210 neurosurgical facilities and proffered five main questions: (1) the adherence of any policy of stopping aspirin pre-operatively, (2) the personal risk assessment for patients with spinal surgery under low-dose aspirin medication, (3) the preferred method of treatment for excessive bleeding in this context, (4) personal knowledge of hemorrhagic complications in this group of patients, and (5) the characteristics of the neurosurgical units concerned. There were 145 (69.1%) responses of which 142 (67.6%) were valid. Of the respondents, 114 (80.3%) had a (written) departmental policy for the discontinuation of pre-operative aspirin treatment, 28 (19.7%) were unaware of such a policy. The mean time suggested for discontinuation of aspirin pre-operatively was 6.9 days (range: 0-21 days), with seven respondents who perform the operations despite the ongoing aspirin medication. Ninety-four respondents (66.2%) considered that patients taking low-dose aspirin were at increased risk for excessive peri-operative hemorrhage or were indetermined (8.6%), and 73 (51.4%) reported having personal experience of such problems. Ninety-two respondents (65.5%) would use special medical therapy, preferably Desmopressin alone or in combination with other blood products or prohemostatic agents (46.1%), if hemorrhagic complications developed intra- or post-operatively. The average number of spinal operations per year in each service was 607.9 (range: 40-1,500). Despite the existence of distinct departmental policies concerning the discontinuation of low-dose aspirin pre-operatively in the majority of neurosurgical facilities performing spinal operations, there is a wide range of the moment of this interruption with an average of 7 days. Two-thirds of the respondents felt that aspirin was a risk factor for hemorrhagic complications associated with spinal procedures, and more than half of the interviewees reported having personal experience of such problems. Finally, various medicamentous methods of counteracting aspirin-induced platelet dysfunction and excessive bleeding in this context are elicited, discussed and evaluated.

Balancing the benefit and risk of oral antiplatelet agents in coronary artery bypass surgery

Concern about possible hemorrhagic complications arising from use of oral antiplatelet agents in immediate proximity to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery leads many clinicians to avoid or discontinue these agents preoperatively. Recent evidence suggests that aspirin and clopidogrel can be used with relative safety in the preoperative period; dual antiplatelet therapy in the 5 days immediately preceding CABG surgery results in a moderate and variable increase in the risk of procedural bleeding. This modest hemorrhagic risk may be acceptable, given the clinical benefits of sustained antiplatelet therapy in preventing graft occlusion and ischemic complications pre- and post-CABG. Because the bleeding risk with aspirin is dose dependent, use of a low dose is preferred post-CABG.

Preoperative Aspirin Therapy Is Associated With Improved Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background— Aspirin is beneficial in the setting of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. There are limited data evaluating preoperative aspirin administration preceding coronary artery bypass grafting and associated postoperative outcomes.

Methods and Results— Using prospectively collected data from 1636 consecutive patients undergoing first-time isolated coronary artery bypass surgery at our institution from January 2000 through December 2002, we evaluated the association between aspirin usage within the 5 days preceding coronary bypass surgery and risk of adverse in-hospital postoperative events. A logistic regression model, which included propensity scores, was used to adjust for remaining differences between groups. Overall, there were 36 deaths (2.2%) and 48 adverse cerebrovascular events (2.9%) in the postoperative hospitalization period. Patients receiving preoperative aspirin (n=1316) had significantly lower postoperative in-hospital mortality compared with those not receiving preoperative aspirin [1.7% versus 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.75; P =0.007]. Rates of postoperative cerebrovascular events were similar between groups (2.7% versus 3.8%; adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.50; P =0.31). Preoperative aspirin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of reoperation for bleeding (3.5% versus 3.4%; P =0.96) or requirement for postoperative blood product transfusion (adjusted OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.54; P =0.28).

Conclusions— Aspirin usage within the 5 days preceding coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with a lower risk of postoperative in-hospital mortality and appears to be safe without an associated increased risk of reoperation for bleeding or need for blood product transfusion.

The effect of preoperative antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery surgery: blood transfusion requirements for patients on cardiopulmonary bypass

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding after heart operations remains a common complication and contributes to morbidity and death. Recent studies have suggested that antiplatelet therapy (APT) may not increase homologous blood requirements in coronary bypass surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of APT therapy on haemorrhage and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass (CABG) on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records from 290 consecutive patients who underwent CABG with CPB were retrospectively reviewed, including 145 patients who received APT within 5 days prior to surgery and 145 control patients (CON). Blood loss was measured up to 24 h. Demographic and clinical patient data were collected until hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Both groups were well matched with respect to demographic and intra-operative data. There was significantly (p < 0.0005) more mediastinal tube drainage at 24 h in the APT group (1123 mL +/- 537 mL) compared to CON patients (874 mL +/- 351 mL). In addition, the APT group received significantly more units of blood (APT: 2.6 +/- 2.5 vs CON: 1.6 +/- 1.8; p < 0.0005), platelet units (APT: 1.2 +/- 1.8 vs CON: 0.2 +/- 0.8; p < 0.0005), and fresh frozen plasma units (APT: 2.0 +/- 2.2 vs CON: 1.3 +/- 2.0; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests consideration should be given to delaying elective CABG for patients who have received APT treatment until APT is discontinued for at least 5 days.

The effect of aspirin on blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients with femoral neck fractures

Although it is widely accepted that aspirin will increase the risk of intra- and post-operative bleeding, clinical studies have not consistently supported this assumption. We aimed to assess the effect of pre-operative aspirin on blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing emergency fixation of femoral neck fractures. A prospective case-control study was undertaken in patients presenting with femoral neck fractures. Parameters recorded included intra-operative blood loss, post-operative blood loss, transfusion requirements and peri-operative reduction in haemoglobin concentration. Of 89 patients presenting with femoral neck fractures 32 were on long-term aspirin therapy. Pre-operative aspirin ingestion did not significantly affect peri-operative blood loss, or change in haemoglobin concentration or haematocrit. However those patients taking aspirin pre-operatively had a significantly lower haemoglobin concentration and haematocrit and were more likely to be anaemic at presentation than those who were not receiving aspirin. Patients taking aspirin were also more likely to receive blood transfusion post-operatively.

Increased blood product use among coronary artery bypass patients prescribed preoperative aspirin and clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

The administration of antiplatelet drugs before coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is associated with an increased risk of major hemorrhage and related surgical reexploration. Little is known about the relative effect of combined clopidogrel and aspirin on blood product use around the time of CABG. We evaluated the associated risk between the combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel and the transfusion of blood products perioperatively.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a cohort of 659 individuals who underwent a first CABG, without concomitant valvular or aortic surgery, at a single large Canadian cardiac surgical centre between January 2000 and April 2002. The four study exposure groups were those prescribed aspirin (n = 105), clopidogrel (n = 11), the combination of both (n = 46), or neither drug (n = 497), within 7 days prior to CABG. The primary study outcome was the excessive transfusion of blood products during CABG and up to the second post-operative day, defined as > or = 2 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), > or = 2 units of fresh frozen plasma, > or = 5 units of cryoprecipitate or > or = 5 units of platelets. Secondary outcomes included the mean number of transfused units of each type of blood product.

RESULTS

A greater mean number of units of PRBC were transfused among those who received clopidogrel alone (2.9) or in combination with aspirin (2.4), compared to those on aspirin alone (1.9) or neither antiplatelet drug (1.4) (P = 0.001). A similar trend was seen for the respective mean number of transfused units of platelets (3.6, 3.7, 1.3 and 1.0; P < 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma (2.5, 3.1, 2.3, 1.6; P = 0.01). Compared to non-users, the associated risk of excessive blood product transfusion was highest among recipients of aspirin and clopidogrel together (adjusted OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.3). No significant association was seen among lone users of aspirin (adjusted OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.6) or clopidogrel (adjusted OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.2-2.5), compared to non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

While combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel shortly before CABG surgery may increase the associated risk of excess transfusion of blood products perioperatively, several study limitations prevent any confident conclusions from being drawn. Beyond challenging these findings, future research might focus on the value of both intraoperative monitoring of platelet function, and the effectiveness of antifibrinolytic agents, at reducing the risk of postoperative bleeding.

Outcome of aspirin use during excision of cutaneous lesions

The perioperative course of 253 patients undergoing excision of cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions by the same surgeon was evaluated, comparing patients using aspirin and those not using aspirin. Intraoperative methods of obtaining hemostasis and the incidence of postoperative complications were evaluated. Suture ligatures were used more frequently in the group using aspirin, but there was no statistical difference in the use of electrocautery. There was also no difference in the incidence of wound dehiscence, erythema, or hematoma. The outcome of excision of cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions under local anesthesia is not affected by patients using aspirin.

Aspirin and postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between aspirin ingestion and postoperative bleeding complications, and to test the hypothesis that there is a subset of patients who are aspirin hyperresponders with a proclivity toward platelet dysfunction.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Despite numerous retrospective and prospective analyses, it is still controversial as to whether aspirin ingestion before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with significant postoperative bleeding.

METHODS

Between January 1995 and December 1999, the records of 2,606 consecutive patients undergoing CABG were reviewed to identify patients with a history of aspirin ingestion up until the time of surgery. Aspirin ingestion was correlated with postoperative blood transfusion using multivariate analysis. In a subset of preoperative aspirin users (n = 40), bleeding times were measured before and after aspirin use. Flow cytometry was performed in another cohort of patients with known heart disease (n = 30) to determine the effect of aspirin on platelet surface receptors.

RESULTS

During the 5-year study period, 63% of the CABG patients were identified as aspirin users. Among these, 23.1% required blood transfusions compared with 19% for the nonusers. Non-red blood cell transfusions were more common in aspirin users, as was reexploration for bleeding. Stratification of these results according to the frequency of aspirin use showed that aspirin is an independent multivariate predictor of postoperative blood transfusion only in high-risk patients. In the prospective studies, aspirin treatment resulted in a significant increase in the template bleeding time, an increase in platelet PAR-1 thrombin receptor activity, and a decrease in the binding of platelets to monocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support the hypothesis that aspirin is associated with a greater likelihood of postoperative bleeding. A platelet function testing algorithm that combines preoperative risk factor assessment, template bleeding times, and flow cytometry may allow the identification of aspirin hyperresponders who are at increased risk for bleeding.

The effect of preoperative aspirin-free interval on red blood cell transfusion requirements in cardiac surgical patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare red blood cell transfusion in first-time coronary artery surgery patients who stopped taking aspirin < or = 2 days, 3 to 7 days, or >7 days preoperatively.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

University-affiliated teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients (n = 797) undergoing first-time coronary artery surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass who were not receiving other anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs before surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were divided into 4 groups based on days since last ingestion of aspirin. Blood products transfused in the groups were (aspirin < or =2 days) (n = 140) 2.2 +/- 4 U of red cell concentrate (RCC) (mean +/- SD), 1.4 +/- 3 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 2.7 +/- 6 U of platelets; (aspirin 3 to 5 days) (n = 255), 1.5 +/- 2 U of RCC, 0.8 +/- 2 U of FFP, and 1.6 +/- 4 U of platelets; (aspirin 6 to 7 days) (n = 215), 1.6 +/- 3 U of RCC, 0.9 +/- 3 U of FFP, and 1.5 +/- 3 U of platelets; and (aspirin >7 days) (n = 187), 1.3 +/- 2 U of RCC; 0.6 +/- 2 U of FFP, and 0.9 +/- 2 U of platelets.

CONCLUSION

Patients who stop taking aspirin < or =2 s preoperatively have increased allogenic red blood cell transfusion requirements perioperatively. Patients who stop taking aspirin 3 to 7 days preoperatively have little or no increased requirement for allogenic red blood cell transfusion.

Management of the patient with coagulation disorders

Understanding normal haemostasis and the pathophysiology of its disorders is essential for providing optimal care and ensuring judicious usage of blood products, as is keeping abreast of novel therapeutic modalities in a rapidly evolving field. The growing availability of synthetic coagulation factors has (at least in the western hemisphere) helped to reduce morbidity and therapeutic complications, while expanding the indications and usage of these agents. Promising advances in gene therapy may indeed introduce a sea change in the next decade or two.

The effects of recent aspirin ingestion on platelet function in cardiac surgical patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of the preoperative aspirin-free interval on platelet function in cardiac surgical patients.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical investigation.

SETTING

University-affiliated teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n = 100).

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the number of days since they last ingested aspirin: < or =2 days, 3 to 7 days, and >7 days. Preoperative platelet function was assessed in all patients using platelet aggregation responses to arachidonic acid, 5 microg/mL, and Platelet Function Analyser (PFA100) collagen/epinephrine closure times.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients who ceased aspirin < or =2 days preoperatively had weaker platelet aggregation responses (18.5% +/- 7% maximum aggregation, mean +/- SD, n = 36) than patients who ceased aspirin 3 to 7 days preoperatively (68.8% +/- 29%, n = 48, p < 0.001) or >7 days preoperatively (68.3% +/- 28%, n = 16, p < 0.001). Similarly, patients who ceased aspirin < or =2 days preoperatively had longer PFA100 closure times (168 +/- 52 sec) than patients who ceased aspirin 3 to 7 days preoperatively (122 +/- 43 sec, p < 0.001) or >7 days preoperatively (128 +/- 42 sec, p < 0.01). The percentage of abnormal responses was also greatest in the aspirin < or =2 days group.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac surgical patients who ingest aspirin < or =2 days preoperatively have greater impairment of platelet function than patients who have a longer preoperative aspirin-free interval.

Effect of preoperative aspirin use on mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients

BACKGROUND

Discontinuing aspirin use in patients before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has focused on bleeding risks. The effect of aspirin use on overall mortality with this procedure has not been studied.

METHODS

We performed a case patient-control patient study of the 8,641 consecutive isolated CABG procedures performed between July 1987 and May 1991 in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Patients included all 368 deaths. Each case patient was paired with approximately two matched survivors (control patients). Aspirin use was defined by identification of ingestion within 7 days before the operation.

RESULTS

CABG patients using preoperative aspirin were less likely to experience in-hospital mortality in univariate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [0.54, 0.97]) and multivariate [OR = 0.55, (0.31, 0.98)] analysis compared to nonusers. No significant difference was seen in the amount of chest tube drainage, transfusion of blood products, or need for reexploration for hemorrhage between patients who did and did not receive aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative aspirin use appears to be associated with a decreased risk of mortality in CABG patients without significant increase in hemorrhage, blood product requirements, or related morbidities.

Factors associated with blood loss and blood product transfusions: a multivariate analysis in children after open-heart surgery

In this prospective cohort study of 548 children undergoing open-heart surgery, we evaluated demographic and perioperative factors to identify variables associated with perioperative blood loss and blood product transfusions. Using multivariate analysis, younger patient age was found to be the variable most significantly associated with bleeding and transfusions. Higher preoperative hematocrit, complex surgery, lower platelet count during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and longer duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest were also significantly associated with bleeding and transfusion. Excessive postoperative chest tube (CT) drainage was associated with intraoperative bleeding. Independently associated variables accounted for 76% of the variability in CT output measured after 2 h in intensive care. Patients were subdivided into children aged < or =1 yr (infants) and children >1 yr; infants bled more intraoperatively (P<0.005); had greater cumulative CT output at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h (P<0.0001); and received more blood products (P<0.0001). Factors associated with bleeding and transfusions varied with patient age. Lower body core temperature during CPB was highly associated with blood loss and transfusions in infants, whereas resternotomy, preoperative congestive heart failure, and prolonged duration of CPB were significant factors associated with bleeding and transfusions in children >1 yr old.

IMPLICATIONS

Knowledge of the factors associated with blood loss and blood product transfusions can help to identify children at risk of excessive bleeding after open-heart surgery.

Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy on platelets

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can produce a mild, systemic hemostatic defect by inhibiting normal platelet function. Aspirin acetylates and permanently inactivates cyclooxygenase (COX), while nonaspirin NSAIDs reversibly block COX; thus, all of these drugs cause platelet dysfunction by inhibiting the formation of thromboxane A2, a platelet-activating and vasoconstricting eicosanoid. However, spontaneous bleeding complications outside the gastrointestinal tract very rarely result from the use of aspirin and other NSAIDs in individuals who are otherwise hemostatically normal. Most types of surgery are not usually associated with clinically significant bleeding in patients taking these drugs, making it typically unnecessary to discontinue them and thus delay surgery for the purpose of restoring normal hemostasis. Exceptions may include operations at sites where optimal hemostasis is critical, surgical manipulation of the genitourinary tract and oral cavity, and possibly cardiac surgery. Factors that increase the risk of bleeding with aspirin and other NSAIDs include coexisting coagulation abnormalities and the simultaneous use of alcohol or anticoagulants.