Failure to down-regulate intragraft cytokine mRNA expression shortly after clinical heart transplantation is associated with high incidence of acute rejection

Differential inflammatory responses of the native left and right ventricle associated with donor heart preservation

BACKGROUND

Dysfunction and inflammation of hearts subjected to cold ischemic preservation may differ between left and right ventricles, suggesting distinct strategies for amelioration.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Explanted murine hearts subjected to cold ischemia for 0, 4, or 8 h in preservation solution were assessed for function during 60 min of warm perfusion and then analyzed for cell death and inflammation by immunohistochemistry and western blotting and total RNA sequencing. Increased cold ischemic times led to greater left ventricle (LV) dysfunction compared to right ventricle (RV). The LV experienced greater cell death assessed by TUNEL+ cells and cleaved caspase-3 expression (n = 4). While IL-6 protein levels were upregulated in both LV and RV, IL-1β, TNFα, IL-10, and MyD88 were disproportionately increased in the LV. Inflammasome components (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3), adaptor molecule apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC), cleaved caspase-1) and products (cleaved IL-1β and gasdermin D) were also more upregulated in the LV. Pathway analysis of RNA sequencing showed increased signaling related to tumor necrosis factor, interferon, and innate immunity with ex-vivo ischemia, but no significant differences were found between the LV and RV. Human donor hearts showed comparable inflammatory responses to cold ischemia with greater LV increases of TNFα, IL-10, and inflammasomes (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Mouse hearts subjected to cold ischemia showed time-dependent contractile dysfunction and increased cell death, inflammatory cytokine expression and inflammasome expression that are greater in the LV than RV. However, IL-6 protein elevations and altered transcriptional profiles were similar in both ventricles. Similar changes are observed in human hearts.

Chemokine Involvement in Lung Injury Secondary to Ischaemia/Reperfusion

INTRODUCTION

During transplant surgeries, the lung experiences an ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R)-induced damage identified as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. However, the mechanisms by which I/R induces leucocyte accumulation and subsequent tissue damage in lung surgeries remain unknown. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the role of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2) in leucocyte chemotaxis related to lung injury secondary to I/R.

METHODS

Six pigs were subjected to an orthotopic left caudal lobe lung transplantation with a subsequent 60-min graft reperfusion (Transplant group). In addition, six animals underwent to sham surgery (Sham Group). Plasma samples and lung biopsies were collected before the beginning of pneumonectomy, before starting the reperfusion, and 30 min and 60 min after the beginning of the reperfusion. Plasma levels of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and lung expressions of MCP-1, MIP-2, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and lung oedema were measured.

RESULTS

Lung I/R caused substantial damage observed as pulmonary oedema. The oedema was evident after the ischemic insult and increased after reperfusion. After reperfusion, increased levels of MPO were observed which suggests an activation and infiltration of neutrophils into the lung tissue. After 30 min of reperfusion, MCP-1, MIP-2, and ICAM-1 levels were significantly increased compared to prepneumonectomy levels (p < 0.05) and a further increase was observed after 60 min of reperfusion (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that activated neutrophils, as well as MCP-1, MIP-2, and ICAM-1, are involved in inflammatory response induced by ischaemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury.

Role of MCP-1 in cardiovascular disease: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications

Many of the major diseases, including cardiovascular disease, are widely recognized as inflammatory diseases. MCP-1 (monocyte chemotactic protein-1) plays a critical role in the development of cardiovascular diseases. MCP-1, by its chemotactic activity, causes diapedesis of monocytes from the lumen to the subendothelial space where they become foam cells, initiating fatty streak formation that leads to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Inflammatory macrophages probably play a role in plaque rupture and the resulting ischaemic episode as well as restenosis after angioplasty. There is strong evidence that MCP-1 plays a major role in myocarditis, ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the heart and in transplant rejection. MCP-1 also plays a role in cardiac repair and manifests protective effects under certain conditions. Such protective effects may be due to the induction of protective ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress chaperones by MCP-1. Under sustained ER stress caused by chronic exposure to MCP-1, the protection would break down resulting in the development of heart failure. MCP-1 is also involved in ischaemic angiogenesis. The recent advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that might be involved in the roles that MCP-1 plays in cardiovascular disease are reviewed. The gene expression changes induced by the signalling events triggered by MCP-1 binding to its receptor include the induction of a novel zinc-finger protein called MCPIP (MCP-1-induced protein), which plays critical roles in the development of the pathophysiology caused by MCP-1 production. The role of the MCP-1/CCR2 (CC chemokine receptor 2) system in diabetes, which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, is also reviewed briefly. MCP-1/CCR2- and/or MCPIP-targeted therapeutic approaches to intervene in inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, may be feasible.

Serum matrix metalloprotease-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor--a predict cardiac allograft rejection

Cardiac allograft rejection is currently diagnosed from endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) that are invasive and impractical to repeat. A serological marker could facilitate rejection monitoring and minimize EMB-associated risks. We investigated the relation of serum matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A concentrations to cardiac allograft rejection, using 1176 EMBs and serum samples obtained from 208 recipients. Acute cellular rejection was diagnosed in 186 EMBs. Mean week 1 and week 2 serum MMP-1 concentrations predicted rejection (p = 0.001, AUC = 0.80). At the optimal cut-off level of >or=7.5 ng/mL, MMP-1 predicted rejection with 82% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Initial serum MMP-1 <5.3 ng/mL (lowest quartile) was associated with rejection-free outcome in 80% of patients. Both MMP-1 (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.67-0.75) and VEGF-A (p < 0.01, AUC = 0.62-0.67) predicted rejection on the next EMB, while rejection at EMB was identified only by VEGF-A (p < 0.02, AUC = 0.70-0.77). Patients receiving combined cyclosporine-A and everolimus had the lowest serum MMP-1 concentrations. While serum MMP-1 predicts rejection-free outcome and VEGF-A identifies rejection on EMB, both markers predict rejection in follow-up of cardiac transplant recipients. Combination of serum MMP-1 and VEGF-A concentration may be a noninvasive prognostic marker of cardiac allograft rejection, and could have important implications for choice of surveillance and immunosuppression protocols.

Gene transfer of RANTES and MCP-1 chemokine antagonists prolongs cardiac allograft survival

Vascularized organ allografts are rapidly destroyed by host immune cells that are recruited along chemokine gradients. Among chemokines, Regulated on Activation, Normal T-cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) CC chemokine ligand (CCL5) and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 (CCL2) are upregulated in rejecting cardiac allografts. To antagonize these chemokines, we constructed adenoviral vectors expressing NH(2)-terminal deletion (8ND) mutants of the respective genes. Using the F344-to-LEW rat model, intragraft gene transfer of chemokine analogs prolonged cardiac allograft survival from 10.1+/-0.7 and 10.4+/-0.7 days using non-coding adenovirus and vehicle alone, respectively, to 17.0+/-0.7 days for 8ND-RANTES (P<0.001) and 14.2+/-0.8 days for 8ND-MCP-1 (P<0.01). 8ND-RANTES reduced graft infiltration by monocytes/macrophages, cluster of differentiation (CD) 8alpha(+) and T-cell receptor alphabeta(+) cells, while 8ND-MCP-1 reduced monocytes/macrophages. In mixed leukocyte reactions in vitro, proliferation of host lymphocytes from regional lymph nodes in response to donor splenocytes was unaffected by 8ND-RANTES gene transfer. Using a two-gene approach, the contribution of 8ND-MCP-1 was negligible, consistent with available evidence that 8ND-RANTES inhibits both RANTES and MCP-1 activities. 8ND-RANTES gene transfer and a short course of low-dose cyclosporine A synergistically prolonged graft survival to 37.8+/-5.5 vs 15.4+/-0.5 days with cyclosporine alone (P<0.001). These results suggest a role for anti-chemokine gene therapy as an adjuvant therapy in heart transplantation.

Does duration of donor brain injury affect outcome after orthotopic pediatric heart transplantation?

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that duration of donor brain injury and death would have an adverse effect on recipient rejection and mortality in pediatric heart transplantation.

METHODS

Ninety-three cardiac transplants were performed at our center from July 1, 1997, through June 30, 2003. The primary study end points were the number of rejection episodes and the time to first rejection. Secondary outcomes were early and late mortality.

RESULTS

Among 88 recipients of 93 cardiac allografts, 5 (6%) and 1 (1%) received second and third allografts, respectively. Overall patient mortality (3 early and 2 late) was 6% (5/88), and overall graft loss was 6% (6/93). Median time from donor brain injury to declaration of brain death (brain injury interval), time from brain death to donor cardiectomy (brain death interval), and graft ischemia time were 38, 24, and 3.3 hours, respectively. Cox regression analysis (adjusting for United Network for Organ Sharing status, ventilator dependence, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular-assist device status, diagnosis of congenital heart disease, sex and cytomegalovirus mismatches, and type of immunosuppression) demonstrated that recipients of donor hearts with relatively long periods from brain injury to death declaration or from death to organ removal had significantly improved rejection-free survival (hazard ratios 0.3, P = .01, and 0.5, P = .05, for brain injury and brain death times, respectively). Prolonged donor heart ischemia did not impact rejection rate. Increasing brain injury interval, brain death interval, and graft ischemia time had no significant effect on mortality.

CONCLUSION

Longer brain injury and death intervals correlated with improved freedom from rejection but had no effect on mortality.

The impact of brain death on survival after heart transplantation: time is of the essence

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that the modality of brain death and time from brain death until harvest impact survival and rejection after heart transplantation.

METHODS

Donor files from 475 adult heart-transplant recipients were examined. From these files, a total management time (time from incident leading to brain death until aortic cross clamp) was determined, and the cause of brain death was noted. Recipient characteristics, details of postoperative course, as well as survival were obtained from the Stanford University Medical Center Heart Transplantation Database.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty (48.4%) donors sustained traumatic injuries, 112 (23.6%) suffered a subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 102 (21.4%) died of a gunshot wound to the head. The modality of brain death did not influence medium and long-term survival. A management time longer than 72 hours was associated with poorer outcome of the heart-transplant recipients. There were significantly more treated rejection episodes in recipients whose donor sustained traumatic injuries.

CONCLUSION

Modality of brain death does not impact survival but appears to influence rejection. Increased management time is associated with adverse survival trends in heart-transplant recipients.

Blood and intragraft CD27 gene expression in cardiac transplant recipients

The present study investigated gene expression of costimulatory molecule CD27 in relation to the occurrence of acute cardiac rejection. CD27 transcripts were measured by means of quantitative competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in 120 endomyocardial biopsies and in 89 samples of blood mononuclear cells from 31 recipients. Higher levels of CD27 transcripts were observed in biopsies with rejection than in samples without rejection (medians, 7.1 and 1.9; P = 0.06). In contrast, blood mononuclear cells collected during rejection showed lower levels than blood mononuclear cells from rejection-free periods (medians, 3.3 vs. 7.9; P = 0.03). Considering only endomyocardial biopsies without rejection, the values were lower in samples from recipients who did not present any rejection during the first 6 months after transplantation than in those from recipients who had at least one rejection during the same period (medians, 0 vs. 3.5, P < 0.001; percentage of biopsies expressing CD27, 44% vs. 77%). In conclusion, the presence of intragraft CD27 mRNA may identify recipients at risk for developing acute rejection.