Emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus in lung transplant recipients

Prevention and management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in kidney transplant: A consensus statement of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan

Kidney transplant recipients have an increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. A strategy for mitigating the risk of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients has not yet been established in Taiwan. The Transplantation Society of Taiwan aimed to develop a consensus by expert opinion on the prevention and management of CMV infection. Based on the results of Consensus Conference, we suggested low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg once daily) for kidney transplant recipients. The prophylaxis duration was ≥6 months for high-risk (D+/R-) patients and 3 months for moderate-risk (R+) patients. Even for low-risk (D-/R-) patients, prophylaxis for at least 3 months is recommended because of the high seroprevalence of CMV in Taiwan. CMV prophylaxis was suggested after anti-thymocyte globulin treatment but not after methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Routine surveillance after prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis after CMV disease treatment, and mTOR inhibitors for primary CMV prophylaxis were not recommended. Letermovir and marabavir are emerging CMV agents used for prophylaxis and refractory CMV disease. CMV immunoglobulins have been used to treat refractory CMV disease in Taiwan. We hope this consensus will help professionals manage patients with CMV in Taiwan to improve the quality of care.

Management of ganciclovir resistance cytomegalovirus infection with CMV hyperimmune globulin and leflunomide in seven cardiothoracic transplant recipients and literature review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease caused by genetically resistant CMV poses a major challenge in solid organ transplant recipients, and the development of resistance is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral resistance affects 5%-12% of patients following ganciclovir (GCV) therapy, but is more common in individuals with specific underlying risk factors. These include the CMV D+R- serostatus, type of transplanted organ, dose and duration of (Val)GCV ([V]GCV) prophylaxis, peak viral loads, and the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. Guideline recommendations for the management of GCV resistance (GanR) in solid organ transplant recipients are based on expert opinion as there is a lack of data from controlled trials. Second-line options to treat GanR include foscarnet (FOS) and cidofovir (CDV), but these drugs are often poorly tolerated due to high rates of toxicity, such as renal dysfunction and neutropenia. Here, we report seven cardiothoracic transplant recipients with GCV resistance CMV infection from our centre treated with CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) +/- leflunomide (LEF) and reviewed the literature on the use of these agents in this therapeutic setting.

Role of CMV chemokine receptor M33 in airway graft rejection in a mouse transplant model

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), one form of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The viral chemokine receptor M33 is essential for successful spread of murine CMV to host salivary glands. In the present study we investigated the impact of M33 on chronic airway rejection.

METHODS

MHC I-mismatched tracheas of C·B10-H2^b/LilMcdJ mice were transplanted into BALB/c (H2^d) recipients and infected at different dates with wild type (WT) or M33-deleted (delM33) MCMV representing clinical settings of viral recipient (R)-donor (D)-serostatus: (D-/R+) or (D+/R-). Grafts were recovered for gene expression and histological / immunofluorescence analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Evaluations showed significantly increased signs of chronic rejection in WT-infected mice compared to uninfected allografts seen in lower epithelium/lamina propria-ratio (ELR) (ELR 0.46 ± 0.07 [WT post] vs. ELR 0.66 ± 0.10 [non-inf.]; p < 0.05). The rejection in delM33-infected groups was significantly reduced vs. WT-infected groups (0.67 ± 0.04 [delM33 post]; vs. WT post p < 0.05). Furthermore, decreased rejection was observed in WT pre-infected compared to post-infected groups (0.56 ± 0.08 [WT pre]; vs. WT post p < 0.05). CD8⁺ T cell infiltration was significantly higher in WT-post compared to the delM33 infected or non-infected allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the role of the CMV in accelerating CLAD. The deletion of chemokine receptor M33 leads to attenuated rejection.

Definitions of Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Recipients for Use in Clinical Trials

Despite advances in preventive strategies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. CMV infection may fail to respond to commercially available antiviral therapies, with or without demonstrating genotypic mutation(s) known to be associated with resistance to these therapies. This lack of response has been termed "resistant/refractory CMV" and is a key focus of clinical trials of some investigational antiviral agents. To provide consistent criteria for future clinical trials and outcomes research, the CMV Resistance Working Group of the CMV Drug Development Forum (consisting of scientists, clinicians, regulatory officials, and industry representatives from the United States, Canada, and Europe) has undertaken establishing standardized consensus definitions of "resistant" and "refractory" CMV. These definitions have emerged from the Working Group's review of the available virologic and clinical literature and will be subject to reassessment and modification based on results of future studies.

Infection prophylaxis and management of viral infection

Viral infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Importantly, several viral infections have been associated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARV) such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), are frequently associated with acute and chronic rejection. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a significant burden in regards to morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is mostly involved with the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), a lymphoid proliferation that occurs in the setting of immunosuppression. On the other hand, the development of direct acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is changing the use of HCV-positive organs in transplantation. In this article we will focus on reviewing common viral infections that have a significant impact on lung transplant recipients looking at epidemiology, prevention and potential treatment.

Global estimate of phenotypic and genotypic ganciclovir resistance in cytomegalovirus infections among HIV and organ transplant patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV), an opportunistic pathogen belonging to Herpesviridae family, is considered as one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality among wide variety of patients, particularly in transplant recipients and HIV positive patients. As this virus can be resistant to treatment, frequency of CMV in patients who receive organ transplantation and people suffering from AIDS was studied between 1980 and 2019. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Iranian Database were reviewed, and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (V2.0, Biostat) software analyzed all data. Finally, we used Cochran's Q-statistic to encounter heterogeneity between different studies. Meta-analyses indicated, GCV resistance was 14.1% (95% CI 11.2-17.7); however, in patients suffering from AIDS and organ transplantation were 19.5% (95% CI 14.7-25.4) and 11.4% (95% CI 8.1-15.8), respectively. There were increasing rates in the prevalence of GCV resistance in CMV among transplant recipients, and HIV positive patients. Therefore, evaluation of these refractory infections is beneficial.

Analysis of Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection Caused by the UL97 Gene Mutation in Codons 460 and 520 in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series

Background

Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has been increasingly recognized. However, there are limited data in pediatric patients. In this study, the prevalence and factors associated with CMV infection with UL97 mutations in pediatric patients treated with ganciclovir but not responding to treatment were evaluated.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2017. All patients who were suspected of having ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and had never had ganciclovir prophylaxis were included. Genotypic assay for UL97 mutations in codons 460 and 520 conferring ganciclovir resistance was performed. Factors associated with the presence of UL97 mutations were analyzed.

Results

Of 34 patients included, 10 patients (29.4%) had a genotypically confirmed UL97 mutation. The median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 3 (0.85–8.68) years. Ganciclovir resistance was tested at a median time (IQR) of 22.5 (14.3–31) days after initiation of ganciclovir. All resistant isolates harbored a UL97 mutation in codon 460. Compared with patients infected with CMV without UL97 mutation, those infected with UL97 mutation strains were younger (median age [IQR], 3.02 [0.85–8.68] vs 10.45 [2.7–16.4] years) and had a higher maximum viral load (median [IQR], 5.06 [4.74–6.05] vs 4.42 [4.03–4.87] copies/mL). Six of 10 (60%) patients were successfully treated with high-dose ganciclovir (7.5 mg/kg twice daily).

Conclusions

UL97 mutation ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection was not uncommon in the pediatric population. Screening for this mutation should be considered in patients experiencing virological worsening while ganciclovir is given, even if patients have not previously received ganciclovir prophylaxis.

Safety considerations with current and emerging antiviral therapies for cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality, and its management is essential for the successful outcome of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Areas covered: This review discusses the safety profiles of currently available and emerging antiviral drugs and the other strategies for HCMV prevention and treatment after transplantation. Expert opinion: Strategies for management of HCMV rely largely on the use of antiviral agents that inhibit viral DNA polymerase (ganciclovir/valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir/brincidofovir) and viral terminase complex (letermovir), with different types and degrees of adverse effects. An investigational agent, maribavir, exerts its anti-CMV effect through UL97 inhibition, and its safety profile is under clinical evaluation. In choosing the antiviral medication to use, it is important to consider these safety profiles in addition to overall efficacy. In addition to antiviral drugs, reduction of immunosuppression is often generally needed in the management of HCMV infection, but with a potential risk of allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. The use of HCMV-specific or non-specific intravenous immunoglobulins remains debated, while adoptive HCMV-specific T cell therapy remains investigational, and associated with unique set of adverse effects.

Improvement in detecting cytomegalovirus drug resistance mutations in solid organ transplant recipients with suspected resistance using next generation sequencing

OBJETIVES

The aim of this study was to identify CMV drug resistance mutations (DRM) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with suspected resistance comparing next-generation sequencing (NGS) with Sanger sequencing and assessing risk factors and the clinical impact of resistance.

METHODS

Using Sanger sequencing as the reference method, we prospectively assessed the ability of NGS to detect CMV DRM in the UL97 and UL54 genes in a nationwide observational study from September 2013 to August 2016.

RESULTS

Among 44 patients recruited, 14 DRM were detected by Sanger in 12 patients (27%) and 20 DRM were detected by NGS, in 16 (36%). NGS confirmed all the DRM detected by Sanger. The additional six mutations detected by NGS were present in <20% of the sequenced population, being located in the UL97 gene and conferring high-level resistance to ganciclovir. The presence of DRM by NGS was associated with lung transplantation (p = 0.050), the administration of prophylaxis (p = 0.039), a higher mean time between transplantation and suspicion of resistance (p = 0.038) and longer antiviral treatment duration before suspicion (p = 0.024). However, the latter was the only factor independently associated with the presence of DRM by NGS in the multivariate analysis (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.87).

CONCLUSIONS

NGS showed a higher yield than Sanger sequencing for detecting CMV resistance mutations in SOT recipients. The presence of DRM detected by NGS was independently associated with longer antiviral treatment.

Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence-based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.

Cytomegalovirus viremia in lung transplantation during and after prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation has a high risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and disease.

METHODS

Valganciclovir was planned for 6 months in CMV recipient seropositive (R+) lung transplants (LTs) and given long-term in D+R- LTs. CMV viremia was monitored regularly during and after prophylaxis in all patients.

RESULTS

Of 137 LTs, 22 were D+R-, 49 D+R+, 43 D-R+, and 23 D-R-, with median follow up 4.1 years (IQR 2.1-6.2 years). CMV viremia at any time occurred in 44.5% of LTs. CMV viral load >10³  c/mL was uncommon (9/77 episodes). CMV viremia occurred at median 665 days (IQR 271-1411 days), in 5.1% LTs <6 months, 20.3% LTs 6-12 months, and 35.8% LTs >12 months. CMV disease occurred in 6 (4.4%) LTs at an overall rate of 1.0 episode per 100 person-years: two of these cases were organ-specific disease, four were CMV syndrome. One case of ganciclovir-resistant CMV was diagnosed. D+R+ and D+R- LTs had higher viremia rates than the D-R+ group. No viremia occurred in D-R- LTs. CMV viremia was not associated with age, gender, type of LT, indication for LT, acute rejection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis for 6 months in D+R+ and D-R+, and past 12 months in D+R- LTs, with long-term monitoring in all patients using a sensitive assay, and reinstitution of valganciclovir for low-level viremia was effective at markedly reducing the incidence of CMV disease. CMV D-R- LTs do not need routine CMV monitoring.

Impaired Cytomegalovirus Immunity in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Lung Transplant Recipients with Short Telomeres

RATIONALE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related morbidities remain one of the most common complications after lung transplantation and have been linked to allograft dysfunction, but the factors that predict high risk for CMV complications and effective immunity are incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if short telomeres in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) lung transplant recipients (LTRs) predict the risk for CMV-specific T-cell immunity and viral control.

METHODS

We studied IPF-LTRs (n = 42) and age-matched non-IPF-LTRs (n = 42) and assessed CMV outcomes. We measured lymphocyte telomere length and DNA sequencing, and assessed CMV-specific T-cell immunity in LTRs at high risk for CMV events, using flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified a high prevalence of relapsing CMV viremia in IPF-LTRs compared with non-IPF-LTRs (69% vs. 31%; odds ratio, 4.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-12.50; P < 0.001). Within this subset, IPF-LTRs who had short telomeres had the highest risk of CMV complications (P < 0.01) including relapsing-viremia episodes, end-organ disease, and CMV resistance to therapy, as well as shorter time to viremia versus age-matched non-IPF control subjects (P < 0.001). The short telomere defect in IPF-LTRs was associated with significantly impaired CMV-specific proliferative responses, T-cell effector functions, and induction of the major type-1 transcription factor T-bet (T-box 21;TBX21).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the short telomere defect has been linked to the pathogenesis of IPF in some cases, our data indicate that impaired CMV immunity may be a systemic manifestation of telomere-mediated disease in these patients. Identifying this high-risk subset of LTRs has implications for risk assessment, management, and potential strategies for averting post-transplant CMV morbidities.

Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid-organ Transplantation: Single-center Experience, Literature Review of Risk Factors, and Proposed Preventive Strategies

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant recipients. Drug-resistant CMV is an emerging problem with poor survival outcomes and limited therapeutic options. In this study we comprehensively address the issue of drug resistance in CMV when compared with standard therapies, such as ganciclovir (GCV) and foscarnet.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients diagnosed with CMV after solid-organ transplant at our center between 2013 and 2017, and identified 7 resistant CMV cases. To study risk factors in the published literature, we performed an extensive database search.

RESULTS

All patients had documented UL97 mutations, and 3 patients harbored both UL97 and UL54 mutations. For cases with increasing viral load or failure to achieve clinical improvement despite optimal therapy, genetic resistance testing was carried out. Patients received GCV and foscarnet combination therapy. As an adjunct, CMV immunoglobulin, cidofovir, and leflunomide were added. Risk factors, including donor⁺/recipient^- serostatus, persistent high viral replication, prolonged therapeutic GCV exposure (>2.5 months), and allograft rejection, were assessed.

CONCLUSION

Patients at risk, especially those with D⁺/R^- serostatus, should be judiciously monitored for resistance. Prolonged intravenous GCV exposure increases the risk for development of drug resistance. Therefore, precise guidelines are required for prevention of long-term GCV/VGCV exposure. Investigation regarding interferon-gamma release assay and adoptive transfer of T cells in diagnosed CMV patients is warranted to improve future prophylactic and management strategies against CMV, with a potential to reduce the requirement for available toxic antiviral drugs.

Risk Factors for the Development of Cytomegalovirus Resistance in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) resistance is an emerging problem in solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors are not well defined.

METHODS

Recipients with CMV viremia of solid organ transplants who underwent CMV resistance testing between January 2010 and March 2016 were divided in 2 groups: proven CMV resistance and refractory CMV infection. A third group was added to compare patients with viremia during the study period with patients with no resistance proven or suspected. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of CMV genotypic resistance.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients underwent resistance testing. Eleven (22.45%) developed genotypic mutations. Group 1 vs groups 2 and 3 had higher prednisone (P = .01) and tacrolimus levels (P = .03); did not respond to antivirals (P < .0001); and had a higher rate of fungal infections (P = .03). CMV resistance was less common in liver and kidney vs heart, small bowel, and mutivisceral recipients (P = .0007). There was no difference in duration of antiviral prophylaxis, viremia while on antiviral prophylaxis, rate of end-organ disease, graft loss, and overall survival. Persistent clinical disease and viremia despite antiviral therapy was the most important risk factor for development of CMV resistance.

CONCLUSION

Persistent clinical disease despite antiviral therapy is an important risk factor and may in part be due to a high degree of immunosuppression. Graft loss and survival were not impacted by CMV resistance.

Letermovir successfully used for secondary prophylaxis in a heart transplant recipient with ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus syndrome (UL97 mutation)

Letermovir was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2017 for use in adult cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients for primary prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease. We report off-label use of letermovir for secondary prophylaxis of genotype-confirmed ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) syndrome (UL 97 mutation [C603W]) in a heart transplant recipient initially treated with intravenous cidofovir followed by foscarnet, both discontinued due to unacceptable toxicities.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Background

Ganciclovir-resistant (ganR) cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an emerging and important problem in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Only through direct comparison of ganR- and ganciclovir-sensitive (ganS) CMV infection can risk factors and outcomes attributable specifically to ganciclovir resistance appropriately be determined.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, case-control (1:3) study of SOT recipients with genotypically confirmed ganR-CMV (n = 37) and ganS-CMV infection (n = 109), matched by donor/recipient CMV serostatus, year and organ transplanted, and clinical manifestation. We used χ2 (categorical) and Mann-Whitney (continuous) tests to determine predisposing factors and morbidity attributable to resistance, and Kaplan-Meier plots to analyze survival differences.

Results

The rate of ganR-CMV was 1% (37/3467) overall and 4.1% (32/777) among CMV donor-positive, recipient-negative patients, and was stable over the study period. GanR-CMV was associated with increased prior exposure to ganciclovir (median, 153 vs 91 days, P < .001). Eighteen percent (3/17) of lung transplant recipients with ganR-CMV had received <6 weeks of prior ganciclovir (current guideline-recommended resistance testing threshold), and all non-lung recipients had received ≥90 days (median, 160 [range, 90-284 days]) prior to diagnosis of ganR-CMV. GanR-CMV was associated with higher mortality (11% vs 1%, P = .004), fewer days alive and nonhospitalized (73 vs 81, P = .039), and decreased renal function (42% vs 19%, P = .008) by 3 months after diagnosis.

Conclusions

GanR-CMV is associated with longer prior antiviral duration and higher attributable morbidity and mortality than ganS-CMV. Upcoming revised CMV guidelines should incorporate organ transplant-specific thresholds of prior drug exposure to guide rational ganR-CMV testing in SOT recipients. Improved strategies for prevention and treatment of ganR-CMV are warranted.

Adoptive T-cell immunotherapy for ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease after lung transplantation

Infections with cytomegalovirus (CMV) can induce severe complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT). The prognosis for ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and disease is particularly poor. Whereas adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T cells has emerged as a powerful tool in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, its translation into the SOT setting remains a significant challenge as underlying immunosuppression inhibits the virus-specific T-cell response in vivo. Here, we demonstrate successful expansion and adoptive transfer of autologous CMV-specific T cells from a seronegative recipient of a seropositive lung allograft with ganciclovir-resistant CMV disease, resulting in the long-term reconstitution of protective anti-viral immunity, CMV infection, disease-free survival and no allograft rejection.

Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation

The negative impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on transplant outcomes warrants efforts toward improving its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. During the last 2 decades, significant breakthroughs in diagnostic virology have facilitated remarkable improvements in CMV disease management. During this period, CMV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) evolved to become one of the most commonly performed tests in clinical virology laboratories. NAT provides a means for rapid and sensitive diagnosis of CMV infection in transplant recipients. Viral quantification also introduced several principles of CMV disease management. Specifically, viral load has been utilized (i) for prognostication of CMV disease, (ii) to guide preemptive therapy, (iii) to assess the efficacy of antiviral treatment, (iv) to guide the duration of treatment, and (v) to indicate the risk of clinical relapse or antiviral drug resistance. However, there remain important limitations that require further optimization, including the interassay variability in viral load reporting, which has limited the generation of standardized viral load thresholds for various clinical indications. The recent introduction of an international reference standard should advance the major goal of uniform viral load reporting and interpretation. However, it has also become apparent that other aspects of NAT should be standardized, including sample selection, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, detection, and calibration, among others. This review article synthesizes the vast amount of information on CMV NAT and provides a timely review of the clinical utility of viral load testing in the management of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. Current limitations are highlighted, and avenues for further research are suggested to optimize the clinical application of NAT in the management of CMV after transplantation.

Prevention and management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid-organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic viral infection to occur following solid-organ transplantation. This review will discuss the current strategies of management of CMV in solid-organ transplantation and their challenges. There are two principal approaches for preventing CMV disease in recipients of solid-organ transplants: prophylactic and pre-emptive. Ganciclovir is the most studied and used antiviral for both treatment and prevention, and is the first-line treatment for CMV infection and CMV disease in transplant recipients. There is no consensus regarding the most appropriate prevention method and the approach to CMV disease prevention differs among transplantation centers owing to the paucity of data comparing the two strategies head-to-head. Currently, the recommended treatment for CMV disease is intravenous ganciclovir.

Lower incidence of CMV infection and acute rejections with valganciclovir prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic infection following lung transplantation. CMV replication in the lung allograft is described as accelerating the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Finding a strategy to prevent CMV infection is an important issue.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-centre study of 114 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) who underwent lung transplantation from January 2001 to December 2006. In a smaller cohort of 88 CMV seropositive (R+) LTRs, three months of valganciclovir prophylaxis (2004-2006) was compared to three months of oral ganciclovir (2001-2003) with respect to the incidence of CMV infection/disease, the severity of CMV disease, acute rejection, BOS-free 4 year survival and 4 year survival. In the whole group of 114 LTRs the impact of CMV infection on long-term survival (BOS free 4 year survival and 6 year survival) was assessed.

Results

For the cohort of 88 CMV seropositive LTRs, the incidence of CMV infection/disease at one year was lower in the valganciclovir group compared to the ganciclovir group (24% vs. 54%, p = 0.003). There was a tendency towards reduced CMV disease, from 33% to 20% and a significant lower incidence of asymptomatic CMV infection (22% vs. 4%, p = 0.005). A lower incidence of acute rejection was observed in the valganciclovir group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in BOS free 4 year survival and 4 year survival.

For the entire group of 114 LTRs, BOS-free 4 year survival for recipients with CMV disease was (32%, p = 0.005) and among those with asymptomatic CMV infection (36%, p = 0.061) as compared with patients without CMV infection (69%). Six year survival was lower among patients with CMV disease, (64%, p = 0.042) and asymptomatic CMV infection (55%, p = 0.018) than patients without CMV infection (84%).

Conclusions

A lower incidence of CMV infection/disease and acute rejections was observed with valganciclovir (3 months) when compared to oral ganciclovir (3 months). The long-term impact of CMV infection/disease was significant for BOS-free survival and survival.

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infections among lung transplant recipients are associated with poor outcomes despite treatment with foscarnet-containing regimens

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are reported infrequently among lung transplant recipients receiving extended valganciclovir prophylaxis. We performed a single-center, retrospective review of ganciclovir-resistant CMV infections in a program that employed valganciclovir prophylaxis for ≥6 months after lung transplant. CMV infections were diagnosed in 28% (170/607) of patients. UL97 mutations were detected in 9.4% (16/170) of CMV-infected patients at a median of 8.5 months posttransplant (range, 5 to 21) and despite prophylaxis for a median of 7 months (range, 4 to 21). UL97 mutations were canonical; 25% (4/16) of strains carried concurrent UL54 mutations. Ganciclovir-resistant CMV was more likely with breakthrough infections (75% [12/16] versus 19% [30/154]; P = 0.00001) and donor positive/recipient negative (D+/R-) serostatus (75% versus 45% [69/154]; P = 0.03). The median whole-blood CMV load was 4.13 log10 copies/cm(3) (range, 2.54 to 5.53), and 93% (14/15) of patients had low-moderate immune responses (Cylex Immunoknow). Antiviral therapy was successful, failed, or eradicated viremia followed by relapse in 12% (2/16), 31% (5/16), and 56% (9/16) of patients, respectively. Eighty-seven percent (14/16) of patients were treated with foscarnet-containing regimens; toxicity developed in 78% (11/14) of these. Median viral load half-life and time to viremia eradication among foscarnet-treated patients were 2.6 and 23 days, respectively, and did not correlate with protection from relapse. Sixty-nine percent (11/16) of patients developed CMV pneumonitis, and 25% (4/16) died of it. Serum viral load was independently associated with death among foscarnet-treated patients (P = 0.04). In conclusion, ganciclovir-resistant CMV infections remained a major cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Foscarnet-based regimens often eradicated viremia rapidly but were ineffective in the long term and limited by toxicity.

Decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with sirolimus in a post hoc randomized, multicenter study in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic infection in lung transplantation. A recent multicenter, randomized trial (the AIRSAC study) comparing sirolimus to azathioprine in lung transplant recipients showed a decreased incidence of CMV events in the sirolimus cohort. To better characterize this relationship of decreased incidence of CMV events with sirolimus, we examined known risk factors and characteristics of CMV events from the AIRSAC database.

METHODS

The AIRSAC database included 181 lung transplant patients from 8 U.S.-based lung transplant centers that were randomized to sirolimus or azathioprine at 3 months post-transplantation. CMV incidence, prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment data were all prospectively collected. Prophylaxis and treatment of CMV were at the discretion of each institution.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of any CMV event was decreased in the sirolimus arm when compared with the azathioprine arm at 1 year after lung transplantation (relative risk [RR] = 0.67, confidence interval [CI] 0.55 to 0.82, p < 0.01). This decreased incidence of CMV events with sirolimus remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors of CMV serostatus and CMV prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support results from other solid-organ transplantation studies and suggest further investigation of this agent in the treatment of lung transplant recipients at high risk for CMV events.

Management strategies for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid organ transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus is the most common viral pathogen that affects solid organ transplant recipients. It directly causes fever, myelosuppression, and tissue-invasive disease, and indirectly, it negatively impacts allograft and patient survival. Nucleic acid amplification testing is the preferred method to confirm the diagnosis of CMV infection. Prevention of CMV disease using antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy is critical in the management of transplant patients. Intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir are the first line drugs for antiviral treatment. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

The time course of development and impact from viral resistance against ganciclovir in cytomegalovirus infection

(Val)ganciclovir is used to treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following solid organ (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) transplantation. Treatment failures occur, but the contribution from 39 known ganciclovir-related mutations (GRMs) in the CMV-UL97 gene remains controversial. We propose a categorization of these GRMs potentially useful when interpreting sequence analyses in clinical settings. The UL97 gene was sequenced from first/recurrent CMV infections among consecutive SOT or HSCT recipients during 2004-2009. GRMs were categorized as: Signature GRM (sGRM) if in vitro ganciclovir IC(50) ratio for mutated versus wild-type virus >2 (n = 24); polymorphic GRM (pGRM) if ratio <2 (n = 15). (Val)ganciclovir treatment failure was defined as persistent viremia for 30 days or switch to foscarnet within this period. Of 99 (49 HSCT and 50 SOT) recipients with one CMV infection episode, 15 (13 HSCT and 2 SOT) experienced a total of 19 recurrent infection episodes. The prevalence of sGRM was 0% at start of first episode, whereas at start of recurrent episodes, prevalence was 37%. Only one sGRM was present at a time in individual patients. Patients with CMV containing an sGRM (vs. wild type)-but not with a pGRM-were at excess risk of treatment failure (odds ratio = 70.6 [95% CI:8.2-609.6]; p < 0.001). sGRMs emerged only following longer termed use of antiherpetic drugs and usually in recurrent CMV infection episodes. Risk of ganciclovir treatment failure was raised if an sGRM was detected.

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

The genetic basis of human cytomegalovirus resistance and current trends in antiviral resistance analysis

Infections due to resistant human cytomegalovirus (CMV) are an emerging problem, particularly in immunocompromised hosts. When managing such patients, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of developing CMV antiviral resistance, especially while on prolonged therapy or if severe immunosuppression is present. CMV resistance to current antiviral agents is mediated by alterations in either the UL97 kinase or DNA polymerase, encoded by the UL97 and UL54 genes, respectively. UL97 mutations are capable of conferring resistance to ganciclovir, while UL54 mutations can impart resistance to ganciclovir, cidofovir, and foscarnet. If treatment failure is suspected to be due to antiviral resistance, CMV resistance analysis should be obtained. Phenotypic resistance assays performed on clinical isolates measure antiviral susceptibilities directly, but are laborious and time-consuming. Therefore, genotypic resistance analysis has become the more common means of diagnosing CMV resistance. Mutations in UL97 or UL54 may be clinically associated with resistance, but their effect on antiviral susceptibility must be confirmed by marker transfer techniques such as recombinant phenotyping.

[Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in lung transplantation]

Lung transplant recipients, more than other organ transplant recipients, are at particular risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. CMV prevention avoids the indirect effects of this virus, such as opportunistic fungal infections and obliterative bronchiolitis, the latter being the major limiting factor in the long-term success of lung-transplantation. CMV prevention strategies have significantly reduced CMV disease and CMV-related mortality. Two major strategies are commonly used for CMV prevention: universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. In lung transplant recipients, the efficacy and safety of preemptive treatment have not been studied and therefore, cannot be recommended. Universal prophylaxis is the best strategy for preventing CMV disease in lung transplant recipients. There is no consensus on the optimal duration of prophylaxis, but the recently published GESITRA-SEIMC/REIPI 2011 Guidelines for the management of CMV infection in solid-organ transplant patients recommend 6 months posttransplantation. In D+/R- recipients, this period can be prolonged to 12 months if there are difficulties in monitoring at 6 months posttransplantation. The future of prevention will probably depend on immunoguided strategies.

Update on cytomegalovirus infections of the gastrointestinal system in solid organ transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of the gastrointestinal tract is the most common manifestation of tissue-invasive CMV disease, and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipient. In addition to the direct effects of the infection, its indirect effects on allograft function, risk for other opportunistic infections, and mortality are significant in this population. The most common clinical syndromes are esophagitis, colitis, and hepatitis; however, infection can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis is usually by histopathology or viral culture of tissue specimens; molecular assays also often have a role. Antivirals are the cornerstone of therapy for gastrointestinal tract CMV disease and complications such as recurrent infection and antiviral resistance are not uncommon. Prevention with antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy is important. This review summarizes recent data regarding the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of gastrointestinal tract CMV infection in the SOT population.

High incidence of anticytomegalovirus drug resistance among D+R- kidney transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy

Anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is recommended in D+R- kidney transplant recipients (KTR), but is associated with a theoretical increased risk of developing anti-CMV drug resistance. This hypothesis was retested in this study by comparing 32 D+R- KTR who received 3 months prophylaxis (valganciclovir) with 80 D+R- KTR who received preemptive treatment. The incidence of CMV infections was higher in the preemptive group than in the prophylactic group (60% vs. 34%, respectively; p = 0.02). Treatment failure (i.e. a positive DNAemia 8 weeks after the initiation of anti-CMV treatment) was more frequent in the preemptive group (31% vs. 3% in the prophylactic group; p = 0.001). Similarly, anti-CMV drug resistance (UL97 or UL54 mutations) was also more frequent in the preemptive group (16% vs. 3% in the prophylactic group; p = 0.05). Antiviral treatment failures were associated with anti-CMV drug resistance (p = 0.0001). Patients with a CMV load over 5.25 log(10) copies/mL displayed the highest risk of developing anti-CMV drug resistance (OR = 16.91, p = 0.0008). Finally, the 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate was reduced in patients with anti-CMV drug resistance (p = 0.02). In summary, preemptive therapy in D+R- KTR with high CMV loads and antiviral treatment failure was associated with a high incidence of anti-CMV drug resistance.

Update and review: state-of-the-art management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease following thoracic organ transplantation

PURPOSE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is among the most important viral pathogens affecting solid organ recipients. The direct effects of CMV (eg, infection and its sequela; tissue invasive disease) are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. In addition, CMV is associated with numerous indirect effects, including immunomodulatory effects, acute and chronic rejection, and opportunistic infections. Due to the potentially devastating effects of CMV, transplant surgeons and physicians have been challenged to fully understand this infectious complication and find the best ways to prevent and treat it to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

Lung, heart, and heart-lung recipients are at considerably high risk of CMV infection. Both direct and indirect effects of CMV in these populations have potentially lethal consequences. The use of available treatment options depend on the level of risk of each patient population for CMV infection and disease. Those at the highest risk are CMV negative recipients of CMV positive organs (D+/R-), followed by D+/R+, and D-/R+. More than 1 guideline exists delineating prevention and treatment options for CMV, and new guidelines are being developed. It is hoped that new treatment algorithms will provide further guidance to the transplantation community. The first part describes the overall effects of CMV, both direct and indirect; risk factors for CMV infection and disease; methods of diagnosis; and currently available therapies for prevention and treatment. Part 2 similarly addresses antiviral-resistant CMV, summarizing incidence, risk factors, methods of diagnosis, and treatment options. Parts 3 and 4 present cases to illustrate issues surrounding CMV in heart and lung transplantation, respectively. Part 3 discusses the possible mechanisms by which CMV can cause damage to the coronary allograft and potential techniques of avoiding such damage, with emphasis on fostering strong CMV-specific immunity. Part 4 highlights the increased incidence of CMV infection and disease among lung transplant recipients and its detrimental effect on survival. The possible benefits of extended-duration anti-CMV prophylaxis are explored, as are those of combination prophylaxis with valganciclovir and CMVIG.

CONCLUSION

Through improved utilization of information regarding optimized antiviral therapy for heart and lung transplant recipients to prevent and treat CMV infection and disease and through increased understanding of clinical strategies to assess, treat, and monitor patients at high risk for CMV recurrence and resistance, the health care team will be able to provide the coordinated effort needed to improve patient outcomes.

Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R-; n=15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis (n=24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy (n=25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections.

RESULTS

CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R- recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R- recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D-R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients.

CONCLUSION

Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.

First report of successful treatment of multidrug-resistant cytomegalovirus disease with the novel anti-CMV compound AIC246

We report the first case of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease treated with AIC246, a novel anti-CMV compound which targets the viral terminase complex and remains active against virus resistant to DNA polymerase inhibitors. A lung transplant recipient developed refractory multidrug-resistant CMV disease involving the lungs, gastrointestinal tract and retina. His disease progressed despite treatment with all DNA polymerase inhibitors; multiple agents reported to have activity against CMV in case series, and reduction in his immunosuppressive medications. AIC246 which is in clinical development was obtained for emergency use, and combined with additional reduction in immunosuppression resulted in rapid clinical, virological and radiological resolution of disease. The patient has remained free of CMV disease or viremia off treatment for greater than 3 months. In summary AIC246, while still in development, may be a promising alternative to current therapies.

The search for new therapies for human cytomegalovirus infections

Ganciclovir (GCV), the therapy of choice for human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and foscarnet, a drug used to treat GCV-resistant CMV infections was approved more than twenty years ago. Although cidofovir and a prodrug of GCV have since been added to the armamentarium, a highly effective drug without significant toxicities has yet to be approved. Such a therapeutic agent is required for treatment of immunocompromised hosts and infants, which bear the greatest burden of disease. The modest antiviral activity of existing drugs is insufficient to completely suppress viral replication, which results in the selection of drug-resistant variants that remain pathogenic, continue to replicate, and contribute to disease. Sustained efforts, largely in the biotech industry and academia, have identified highly active lead compounds that have progressed into clinical studies with varying levels of success. A few of these compounds inhibit new molecular targets, remain effective against isolates that have developed resistance to existing therapies, and promise to augment existing therapies. Some of the more promising drugs will be discussed with an emphasis on those progressing to clinical studies. Their antiviral activity both in vitro and in vivo, spectrum of antiviral activity, and mechanism of action will be reviewed to provide an update on the progress of potential new therapies for CMV infections.

Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Antiviral drug resistance is an increasing concern in immunocompromised patient populations, where ongoing viral replication and prolonged drug exposure lead to the selection of resistant strains. Rapid diagnosis of resistance can be made by associating characteristic viral mutations with resistance to various drugs as determined by phenotypic assays. Management of drug resistance includes optimization of host factors and drug delivery, selection of alternative therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms of resistance, and the development of new antivirals. This article discusses drug resistance in herpesviruses and hepatitis B.

Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Antiviral drug resistance is an increasing concern in immunocompromised patient populations, where ongoing viral replication and prolonged drug exposure lead to the selection of resistant strains. Rapid diagnosis of resistance can be made by associating characteristic viral mutations with resistance to various drugs as determined by phenotypic assays. Management of drug resistance includes optimization of host factors and drug delivery, selection of alternative therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms of resistance, and the development of new antivirals. This article discusses drug resistance in herpesviruses and hepatitis B.

Testing the susceptibility of human herpesviruses to antivirals

Herpesviruses cause chronic lifelong infections in humans and may cause life-threatening diseases in immunosuppressed patients. Antiviral drugs targeted to viral DNA polymerase, such as acyclovir, penciclovir, ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir, are currently available and have been proven to be efficient against clinical symptoms of herpesvirus infections. The resistance of herpesviruses to these drugs is associated with specific mutations of viral genes encoding either DNA polymerase or enzymes phosphorylating nucleoside analogs. Resistance is detected and characterized by means of specific susceptibility assays, which can be classified as phenotypic, genetic and functional. These tests are used both to investigate novel antiviral compounds and look for the emergence of resistant viruses in treated patients in case of clinical failure. Although susceptibility assays are often time consuming and present some limitations regarding the interpretation of their results, their use in the monitoring of antiherpetic treatments should be promoted and improved, in parallel to the development of novel efficient drugs.

Cytomegalovirus resistance in solid organ transplant recipients treated with intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir

Background

The rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance was assessed in a trial comparing intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir for treatment of CMV disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

Methods

Viral genes ( UL97 and UL54) conferring ganciclovir resistance were amplified and sequenced from blood samples collected at days 0 (before therapy), 21 (end of induction) and 49 (end of maintenance).

Results

The overall risk of developing a confirmed or probable ganciclovir resistance mutation during treatment was similar for patients treated with ganciclovir (2.3%) and valganciclovir (3.6%; P=0.51). A persistent viral load at day 21 was associated with a significant risk of ganciclovir resistance by day 49 (odds ratio 11.83; P=0.022). In multivariate analyses, presence of a confirmed ganciclovir resistance mutation was independently associated with virological failure (viral load ≥600 copies/ml) at days 21 and 49. One-third (3/9) of patients with confirmed CMV resistance mutations had recurrent CMV disease. The plasma half-life of confirmed ganciclovir-resistant UL97 mutants was significantly longer than that of wild-type strains, polymorphic variants and strains with mutations of unknown significance ( P=0.045). Multiple UL54 mutations of unknown significance were found in clinical strains. Viral kinetic analysis of these latter strains revealed no effect (negative or positive) on in vivo viral fitness.

Conclusions

Treatment with oral valganciclovir or intravenous ganciclovir results in similar and low rates of resistance mutations in SOT recipients. Patients with drug-resistant CMV strains often have virological failure and might have unfavourable clinical outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of CMV disease treatment with valganciclovir versus IV ganciclovir in solid organ transplant recipients

Though an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplantation (SOT), the long-term outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease treatment have not been well studied. In a randomized trial, 321 SOT recipients with CMV disease were followed 1 year after treatment with either twice daily intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir (for 21 days) followed by once daily valganciclovir until day 49 in all patients. Clinical and viral eradication of CMV disease was similar between groups. Clinical recurrence beyond day 49 was found in 15.1% and virological recurrence in 30.0%, no difference between groups (p > 0.77). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the only independent predictor for recurrence was failure to eradicate DNAemia by day 21 (clinical: OR 3.9 [1.3-11.3], p = 0.012; virological: OR 5.6 [2.5-12.6], p < 0.0001). Eight patients developed ganciclovir resistance, with no difference between groups (p = 0.62). Twenty patients (valganciclovir: 11, ganciclovir: 9, p = 0.82) died, 12 due to infections, two involving CMV disease. There were no differences in long-term outcomes between treatment arms, further supporting the use of oral valganciclovir for treatment of CMV disease. Persistent DNAemia at day 21, CMV IgG serostatus and development of resistance may be relevant factors for further individualization of treatment.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in cytomegalovirus-seropositive kidney-transplant patients

The aims of this prospective, open-label, single-center pilot study were to assess the efficacy and safety of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) prophylaxis using valganciclovir in HCMV- seropositive kidney-transplant patients to prevent HCMV infection and disease. Fifty-one HCMV seropositive kidney-transplant patients recipients who received transplants between 1 December 2005 and 30 November 2006 were included in the study. Valganciclovir was given from transplantation up to 114 (37-329) days, and was adapted to renal function, i.e., 900 mg/d if calculated creatinine clearance was >60 ml/min, or 450 mg/day if it was <60 ml/min. HCMV DNAemia was assessed every 2 weeks during prophylaxis, and on the same basis for 3 months post-prophylaxis. Immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors (ciclosporine A=22; tacrolimus=11), with mycophenolate mofetil (n=51), and low-dose steroids. Eighteen patients received no calcineurin-inhibitors, but Belatacept instead. During valganciclovir prophylaxis, asymptomatic HCMV DNAemia was observed in one patient, and no case of HCMV disease occurred. Within 252 days (45-425) post-valganciclovir prophylaxis, HCMV DNAemia was detected in 23.5% (n=12) of patients, of whom two had two or more consecutive HCMV DNAemias. Valganciclovir prophylaxis in HCMV-seropositive kidney-transplant patients is effective for preventing cytomegalovirus disease.

Ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus: a call for indefinite prophylaxis in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Universal ganciclovir (GCV) prophylaxis is a strategy aimed at reducing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and delaying the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). However, the optimal duration of GCV prophylaxis remains unclear. We report our experience with GCV prophylaxis administered indefinitely and its effect on CMV pneumonitis, BOS and survival after lung transplantation (LT).

METHODS

One hundred fifty-one patients surviving >100 days after LT were analyzed. GCV was given to 130 CMV donor- or recipient-seropositive patients. Data from 90 patients who received indefinite GCV prophylaxis (IND) and 40 patients who discontinued their GCV prophylaxis (STOP) were compared.

RESULTS

CMV pneumonitis occurred in 16%, 8%, 17% and 19% of patients in the D+R+, D-R+, D+R- and D-R- groups, respectively. In the STOP cohort, 15 of 40 patients developed CMV pneumonitis (median time 79 days) after GCV was stopped. Ten of these 15 patients developed BOS (median time 116 days) after discontinuing GCV. The risk of CMV pneumonitis in the STOP cohort was significantly higher when GCV prophylaxis was discontinued within the first year. Cumulative incidence of CMV pneumonitis in the IND and STOP groups at 5 years was 2% and 57%, respectively (p < 0.001). BOS-free survival and survival were similar across both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Indefinite GCV prophylaxis prevents CMV pneumonitis in 98% of LT recipients. Thirty-eight percent of patients discontinuing prophylaxis developed CMV pneumonitis, 50% of whom progressed to BOS within 1 year. Continuing ganciclovir prophylaxis indefinitely after lung transplantation should be considered.