Cardiac transplantation in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias

Multidisciplinary Critical Care Management of Electrical Storm: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Electrical storm (ES) reflects life-threatening cardiac electrical instability with 3 or more ventricular arrhythmia episodes within 24 hours. Identification of underlying arrhythmogenic cardiac substrate and reversible triggers is essential, as is interrogation and programming of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, if present. Medical management includes antiarrhythmic drugs, beta-adrenergic blockade, sedation, and hemodynamic support. The initial intensity of these interventions should be matched to the severity of ES using a stepped-care algorithm involving escalating treatments for higher-risk presentations or recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. Many patients with ES are considered for catheter ablation, which may require the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support. Outcomes after ES are poor, including frequent ES recurrences and deaths caused by progressive heart failure and other cardiac causes. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach to the management of ES is crucial, and evaluation for heart transplantation or palliative care is often appropriate, even for patients who survive the initial episode.

Cardiac radioablation in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia

Cardiac radioablation with SBRT is a very promising non-invasive modality for the treatment of refractory VT and potentially other cardiac arrhythmias. Initial reports indicate that it is relatively safe and associated with excellent responses, particularly in reduction of ICD-related events, need for anti-arrhythmic medications, and resulting in significantly improved quality of life for patients. Establishment of objective criteria for candidates for cardiac radioablation will accelerate the adoption of this important radiation therapy modality in the treatment of refractory VT and other cardiac arrhythmias in the coming years. In addition, in order to develop more prospective safety and efficacy data, treatment of patients should ideally be performed in the context of clinical trials or prospective registries at, or in collaboration with, experienced centers. Taken together, the future of cardiac radioablation is rich and worthy of further investigation to become a standard treatment in the armamentarium against refractory VT.

Treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with heart failure

Heart failure is a major public health concern that is frequently complicated by ventricular arrhythmias. Sustained ventricular tachycardia is associated with an increased risk for progressive heart failure and sudden death. We summarize the current management strategies for ventricular tachycardia in heart failure patients, including implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, pharmacologic therapy, catheter ablation techniques, ventricular assist device therapy, and heart transplantation.

[Perception of organ grafts by internists]

INTRODUCTION

At the time when organ transplantation occupies a preponderant place in the treatment of many pathologies, the role of the internist in the care of grafted patients remains confidential and poorly defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 730 internist practitioners. The aims of this questionnaire were to evaluate 1) their level of knowledge and practice of transplantation; 2) their declared interest on the subject; and finally 3) their perception of the theoretical place of the internists in the transplantation.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-five answered. Although nearly 80% of the practitioners who answered this investigation declared themselves interested in the subject of transplantation, more than 60% considered their theoretical and practical knowledge on the subject to be insufficient. Nearly 70% said they felt ill at ease when faced with a grafted patient in consultation. Nearly two experts out of three considered that the role of the internist in the follow-up of grafted patients should be reinforced but less than 50% of them wished to be more involved, directly and personally.

DISCUSSION

Whereas grafted patients frequently suffer from polypathologies that could be treated in internal medicine, a majority of internists do not wish to be directly implicated and/or do not feel qualified to treat these patients. The inherent risk in this is to see this specialty gradually excluded from the care networks available to grafted patients.