Operative Techniques for Radical Surgery for Rectal Carcinoma

Colorectal Cancer: What has Changed in Diagnosis and Treatment over the Last 50 Years?

Aims and background

This overview focuses on what has changed in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer over the last 50 years.

Methods

The most important international registers (SEER, European and Italian) as well as the literature have been consulted. Furthermore, many prognostic factors are analyzed with the aim to understand the reasons why 5-year survival has improved over the last two decades.

Results

Since the biologic characteristics of the tumor cannot be changed, improved survival must be supported by concomitant multiple factors, such as earlier diagnosis (as given by a more informed educational behavior and the advent of screening) as well as the wide use of colonoscopy and the technical improvement of surgical and medical treatment. However, it seems that the greatest improvement in survival is limited to 5-year controls, whereas long-term survival does not appear to show any significant improvement.

Conclusions

We can hypothesize that our efforts have just delayed the inevitable end: death. Nevertheless, further research should be done to confirm this hypothesis, perhaps in the field of molecular biology, which may also be the right approach to understanding the biologic aggressiveness of each tumor.

Effect of anastomosis level on continence performance and quality of life after colonic J-pouch reconstruction

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the recommended method for treatment of cancer in the middle or lower third of the rectum. Thus very low anastomoses are necessary to preserve continence, and pouch reconstruction is favored. It is unclear whether the level of anastomosis is important for continence and quality of life in colonic J-pouch reconstruction. In this investigation all patients were included who underwent curative elective anterior continuity resection with colorectal or coloanal J-pouch reconstruction for primary rectal cancer between January 2001 and December 2004. Exclusion criteria were distant metastases and any signs of recurrence at the time of investigation. Evaluation of continence performance by Wexner and Holschneider questionnaire and quality of life using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 (EORTC) questionnaires was done 220 +/- 38 days after closure of the protective Ileostomy, which was performed 106 +/- 48 days after primary intervention. Fifty-two patients (79%) were analyzed. Colopouch rectal anastomosis was performed in eighteen cases and colopouch anal anastomosis in thirty-four cases. Fifty percent of the patients in both groups were continent for solid stool. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly higher rate of incontinence for liquid stool, however. They took stool-regulating medicine more frequently and complained of fecal soiling and a restricted quality of life. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly lower score on the most important points of the QLQ-C30 (emotional functioning, social functioning, pain, and quality of life). The same applied to the QLQ-CR38 for body image and problems with defecation. The quality of life of patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis was still considered acceptable compared with reference data for the normal healthy population, however. Both continence and quality of life are substantially affected by the level of the anastomosis after colonic pouch reconstruction. This suggests preservation of a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible and performing a colopouch rectal anastomosis.

Experience of surgery for rectal cancer with total mesorectal excision in a general surgical practice

BACKGROUND

Results from specialist centres have shown that total mesorectal excision (TME) produces excellent control of local disease in patients with carcinoma of the rectum.

METHODS

The results of TME were reviewed in a surgical practice in which patients with rectal cancer comprised 1 per cent of the total caseload and mean case numbers were less than 15 each year.

RESULTS

Eighty-two consecutive patients underwent rectal excision with TME over a 72-month period (68 anterior resection, eight abdominoperineal excision and six Hartmann's procedure). Sixty-nine operations were deemed 'curative' at the time of surgery. Anastomotic leak occurred in two (3 per cent) of 68 patients, both of whom recovered without additional surgery. There were two local recurrences (3 per cent) among 69 patients who underwent 'curative' surgery. At a median follow-up of 190 weeks, the survival rate for Dukes' stage A, B, C and 'D' was 100, 83, 68 and 18 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outcome as measured by perioperative morbidity and local disease control achieved in a surgical practice with a broad case mix and relatively low annual case volume was comparable to that from larger centres. Appropriate surgical training and attention to technical detail may be as important as case volume in determining outcome after surgery for rectal cancer.