The relationship of prorenin values to microvascular complications in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Sex differences in soluble prorenin receptor in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

The soluble prorenin receptor (sPRR), a member of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), is elevated in plasma of patients with preeclampsia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and type 2 diabetes. Our goal was to examine the relationship between sPRR and RAS activation to define whether sexual dimorphisms in sPRR might explain sex disparities in renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-nine participants were included in the study (mean age, 48 ± 16 years; 42% men, 58% women), including 173 controls and 96 subjects with type 2 diabetes. In plasma and urine, we measured sPRR, plasma renin activity (PRA), and prorenin. In the urine, we also measured angiotensinogen along with other biomarkers of renal dysfunction.

RESULTS

Plasma sPRR and PRA were significantly higher in women with type 2 diabetes compared to men. In these women, plasma sPRR was positively correlated with PRA, age, and body mass index (BMI). In contrast, in men the sPRR in urine but not in plasma positively correlated with eGFR in urine, but negatively correlated with urine renin activity, plasma glucose, age, and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes, sPRR contributes to RAS stimulation in a sex-dependent fashion. In diabetic women, increased plasma sPRR parallels the activation of systemic RAS; while in diabetic men, decreased sPRR in urine matches intrarenal RAS stimulation. sPRR might be a potential indicator of intrarenal RAS activation and renal dysfunction in men and women with type 2 diabetes.

Longitudinal Changes in Prorenin and Renin in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Prorenin, a precursor of renin, and renin play an important role in regulation of the renin-angiotensin system. More recently, receptor-bound prorenin has been shown to activate intracellular signaling pathways that mediate fibrosis, independent of angiotensin II. Prorenin and renin may thus be of physiologic significance in CKD, but their plasma concentrations have not been well characterized in CKD.

METHODS

We evaluated distribution and longitudinal changes of prorenin and renin concentrations in the plasma samples collected at follow-up years 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study, an ongoing longitudinal observational study of 3,939 adults with CKD. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression of log-transformed values were used to describe cross-sectional and longitudinal variation and associations with participant characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 3,361 CRIC participants had plasma available for analysis at year 1. The mean age (±standard deviation, SD) was 59 ± 11 years, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ± SD) was 43 ± 17 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Median (interquartile range) values of plasma prorenin and renin at study entry were 4.4 (2.1, 8.8) ng/mL and 2.0 (0.8, 5.9) ng/dL, respectively. Prorenin and renin were positively correlated (Spearman correlation 0.51, p < 0.001) with each other. Women and non-Hispanic blacks had lower prorenin and renin values at year 1. Diabetes, lower eGFR, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, and diuretics were associated with higher levels. Prorenin and renin decreased by a mean of 2 and 5% per year, respectively. Non-Hispanic black race and eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at year 1 predicted a steeper decrease in prorenin and renin over time. In addition, each increase in urinary sodium excretion by 2 SDs at year 1 increased prorenin and renin levels by 4 and 5% per year, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

The cross-sectional clinical factors associated with prorenin and renin values were similar. Overall, both plasma prorenin and renin concentrations decreased over the years, particularly in those with severe CKD at study entry.

Aliskiren, the future of renin–angiotensin system blockade?

The suppression of the renin-angiotensin system by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers has been proven in many studies to treat hypertension and reduce cardiovascular events; however, reducing angiotensin I receptor stimulation results in the loss of the negative-feedback signal, leading to increased plasma renin activity. Numerous direct renin inhibitors were synthesized, but abandoned owing to low potency, poor bioavailability and short half-life. Aliskiren, a direct renin inhibitor of a novel structural class, inhibits the activity of the renin produced and, thus, its capacity to form angiotensin I, as measured by plasma renin activity. Aliskiren has been recently shown to be efficacious in hypertensive patients at once-daily oral dosing with favorable pharmacokinetics and the potential to improve end-organ protection.

[Current status of antihypertensive drug treatment in primary care practice at launch of the new renin inhibitor aliskiren (RASANT)]

PURPOSE

The present drug utilization research project was conducted in order to evaluate the current status of antihypertensive drug treatment at launch of aliskiren - a drug targeting a completely new pharmacological mode of action - and to investigate the potential therapeutic value of this new therapeutic principle.

METHODS

In 1,431 primary care practices in Germany, general practitioners and internal specialists were requested to determine the therapeutic value of different antihypertensive drugs (3rd and 4th quarter of 2007). Physicians were also requested to expose potential advantages of the new therapeutic principle of direct renin inhibition. Additional epidemiologic data such as age, gender and comorbidities were collected for each antihypertensive patient considered an optimal candidate to receive aliskiren in the respective medical practice due to an unfavorable response to the current antihypertensive treatment by using a second questionnaire.

RESULTS

On a scale between 1 (very important) and 6 (unimportant), the therapeutic value of antihypertensive drugs was judged as follows: angiotensin-inhibiting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (98.8%), angiotensin (AT)(1) receptor blockers (87.4%), beta-receptor blockers (71.2%), calcium channel blockers (58.9%), thiazide diuretics (56,3%), and loop diuretics (32.3%) were judged with the mark 1 (very important) and 2 (important). From a total of 14,358 patients included in the present survey, age, gender, severity and duration of arterial hypertension, complications and comorbidities, and a detailed drug history were collected. 50.3% of the patients received an ACE inhibitor, 27.9% an AT(1) receptor blocker, 45.7% a beta-receptor blocker, 37.5% a calcium channel blocker, and 53.2% a diuretic. Dominating comorbidities up to the time of data collection were diabetes mellitus (43.8%), coronary heart disease (37.3%), and chronic heart failure (20.7%). 89.4% of patients with diabetes received either an ACE inhibitor or an AT(1) receptor blocker compared to 69.6% of patients not suffering from diabetes.

CONCLUSION

According to the evaluation of primary care physicians participating in this study, aliskiren might be useful for antihypertensive treatment in patients with severe arterial hypertension, in patients with an already long-lasting course of disease, and in the presence of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus. The high percentage of patients in this study cohort already treated with an ACE inhibitor or an AT(1) receptor blocker represents good adherence of primary care physicians to current treatment guidelines. The evaluation of loop diuretics as important antihypertensive drugs by 32.3% of attending physicians in this study requires critical discussion.

Managing cardiovascular and renal risk: the potential of direct renin inhibition

Aliskiren is the first direct renin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertension. Clinical experience from studies in over 14,000 patients has shown that aliskiren, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive therapies, provides effective blood pressure lowering with a good safety and tolerability profile.The ultimate aim of antihypertensive therapy, however, is to reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes.The effect of aliskiren on surrogate markers of organ damage and clinical outcomes is being assessed in the ongoing ASPIRE HIGHER programme, the largest clinical trials programme in the cardio-renal disease area. Results from the ALOFT, AVOID and ALLAY studies suggest that aliskiren has positive effects on markers of cardiovascular and renal damage in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy.ASPIRE HIGHER also includes four large-scale studies assessing the potential outcome benefits of aliskiren, and the results of these trials will help define the clinical utility of aliskiren in the treatment of cardiovascular and renal diseases. In this article, we review the antihypertensive efficacy of aliskiren and explore its potential in the management of cardiovascular and renal risk.

Renal and hormonal responses to direct renin inhibition with aliskiren in healthy humans

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological interruption of the renin-angiotensin system focuses on optimization of blockade. As a measure of intrarenal renin activity, we have examined renal plasma flow (RPF) responses in a standardized protocol. Compared with responses with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (rise in RPF approximately 95 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)), greater renal vasodilation with angiotensin receptor blockers (approximately 145 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)) suggested more effective blockade. We predicted that blockade with the direct oral renin inhibitor aliskiren would produce renal vascular responses exceeding those induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty healthy normotensive subjects were studied on a low-sodium (10 mmol/d) diet, receiving separate escalating doses of aliskiren. Six additional subjects received captopril 25 mg as a low-sodium comparison and also received aliskiren on a high-sodium (200 mmol/d) diet. RPF was measured by clearance of para-aminohippurate. Aliskiren induced a remarkable dose-related renal vasodilation in low-sodium balance. The RPF response was maximal at the 600-mg dose (197+/-27 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)) and exceeded responses to captopril (92+/-20 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2); P<0.01). Furthermore, significant residual vasodilation was observed 48 hours after each dose (P<0.01). The RPF response on a high-sodium diet was also higher than expected (47+/-17 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)). Plasma renin activity and angiotensin levels were reduced in a dose-related manner. As another functional index of the effect of aliskiren, we found significant natriuresis on both diets.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal vasodilation in healthy people with the potent renin inhibitor aliskiren exceeded responses seen previously with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. The effects were longer lasting and were associated with significant natriuresis. These results indicate that aliskiren may provide more complete and thus more effective blockade of the renin-angiotensin system.

Novel drugs targeting hypertension: renin inhibitors and beyond

The idea of renin inhibition is not new, and evidence of attempts to block its activity can be found in the literature as early as the 1950s. Throughout the latter half of the 20th century, development of renin inhibitors encountered many problems. Only recently, after the x-ray crystallography of its active site, new and effective renin inhibitors have been developed. The purpose of this review is to describe the basic evidence to support the efficacy of these agents and to elaborate on new possibilities of their use and combination with other antihypertensive drugs.

Direct Renin Inhibition with Aliskiren in Hypertension and Target Organ Damage

The Joint National Committee and the World Health Organization are in agreement that hypertension in most patients who are treated is controlled inadequately and that rates of cardiovascular morbidity remain high. Additional pharmacologic treatments could ameliorate this situation. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has been a highly successful pharmacologic target, as the system is strongly implicated in the development of hypertension-related target organ damage. However, compensatory increases in plasma renin levels that lead to adjustments in angiotensin production and conversion present limitations for existing renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. A once-daily, orally effective, small-molecule renin inhibitor, aliskiren, is now available to address angiotensin production directly at its rate-limiting step. Studies in humans attest to an effective BP-lowering effect, a side effect profile no different from AT1 receptor blockers, and the option of combination therapies. A novel animal model of high human renin hypertension in the rat attest to target organ protection. Because angiotensin receptor blockade, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, calcium channel blockade, and diuretic therapy all lead to sharp increases in plasma renin activity, aliskiren offers a novel circumvention.

Transmural pressure control of prorenin processing and secretion in diabetic rat juxtaglomerular cells

In diabetic patients, the elevation of plasma prorenin levels or arterial pressure is correlated with the severity of diabetic nephropathy. This study was designed to assess the effects of transmural pressure on prorenin regulation in juxtaglomerular (JG) cells from diabetes rats. The JG cells, harvested from rats intraperitoneally injected with streptozotocin 7 (early-diabetic) or 28 (late-diabetic) days previously, were exposed to atmospheric pressure (AP) and AP+40 mmHg for 12 h, and the renin secretion rate (RSR), prorenin secretion rate (PRSR), active renin content (ARC), prorenin content (PRC), and total renin content (TRC) were determined. Exposure of control JG cells to AP+40-mmHg significantly decreased RSR, PRSR, and ARC and significantly increased PRC without affecting TRC, suggesting the occurrence of pressure-mediated inhibition of prorenin processing and secretion. Exposure of early-diabetic and late-diabetic cells to AP+40-mmHg significantly decreased ARC and significantly increased PRC without affecting RSR, PRSR, or TRC. The changes in ARC and PRC were similar in the control and early-diabetic cells, but greater changes were observed in late-diabetic cells. However, when streptozotocin-treated rats were continuously treated with insulin (9 U/kg/day), the transmural pressure control of prorenin in JG cells was similar to that observed in the JG cells from control rats. In late-diabetic cells, treatment with a phospholipase C inhibitor did not alter the pressure control of ARC or PRC; however, treatment with a phospholipase D inhibitor did inhibit the changes in ARC and PRC with transmural pressure. Thus, pressure-mediated inhibition of prorenin secretion from JG cells has already been impaired in early diabetes. Pressure-induced inhibition of prorenin processing in JG cells via phospholipase D-dependent pathways is enhanced in late diabetes.

The relationship among homocysteine, creatinine clearance, and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Although it is accepted that elevated plasma homocysteine (tHcy) levels occur in end-stage renal disease and type 2 diabetes, the changes with milder renal dysfunction (e.g., microalbuminuria) are less clearly established. This study explores the relationship among tHcy, creatinine clearance (Ccr), and albumin excretion rate (AER) in a population with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 260 patients with type 2 diabetes were screened in our outpatient clinic during 10 months. Fasting blood samples were collected, and AER was calculated from an overnight timed urine sample. Ccr was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula.

RESULTS

A total of 198 subjects (76%) had normoalbuminuria (<20 microg/min), 50 subjects (19%) had microalbuminuria (20-200 microg/min), and 12 subjects (5%) had macroalbuminuria (>or=200 microg/min). Those with microalbuminuria had higher levels of tHcy than those with normoalbuminuria (13.2 +/- 7.8 vs. 11.3 +/- 4.6 micromol/l, P < 0.05). Patients were then subdivided based on low Ccr (<80 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)) and normal Ccr (>or=80 x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)). None of the patients with macroalbuminuria had normal Ccr. In those with normoalbuminuria, tHcy levels were higher than in those with low Ccr than in those with normal Ccr (12.0 +/- 4.6 vs. 10.0 +/- 4.4 micromol/l, P < 0.01). The same was found for those with microalbuminuria (low Ccr versus normal Ccr: 14.6 +/- 9.0 vs. 10.2 +/- 2.8 micromol/l, P < 0.02). For normal Ccr, tHcy was similar irrespective of AER (normoalbuminuria versus microalbuminuria: 10.0 +/- 4.4 vs. 10.2 +/- 2.8 micromol/l, NS). For low Ccr, tHcy was higher in those with microalbuminuria versus normoalbuminuria (14.6 +/- 9.0 vs. 12.0 +/- 4.6 micromol/l, P = 0.01). Using multivariate regression, Ccr, but neither AER nor the presence of albuminuria, was an independent predictor of tHcy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data strongly suggest that in patients with type 2 diabetes, the relationship between plasma tHcy and AER is largely due to associated changes in renal function, as defined by Ccr.