Glenohumeral relationship in the transverse plane of the body

Study on Shoulder Joint Parameters and Available Supraspinatus Outlet Area Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Studies addressing the anatomical values of the supraspinatus outlet area (SOA) and the available supraspinatus outlet area (ASOA) are insufficient. This study focused on precisely measuring the SOA and ASOA values in a sample from the Chinese population using 3D CT (computed tomography) reconstruction. We analyzed CT imaging of 96 normal patients (59 males and 37 females) who underwent shoulder examinations in a hospital between 2011 and 2021. The SOA, ASOA, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), coracohumeral distance (CHD), coracoacromial arch radius (CAR), and humeral head radius (HHR) were estimated, and statistical correlation analyses were performed. There were significant sex differences observed in SOA (men: 957.62 ± 158.66 mm2; women: 735.87 ± 95.86 mm2) and ASOA (men: 661.35 ± 104.88 mm2; women: 511.49 ± 69.26 mm2), CHD (men: 11.22 ± 2.24 mm; women: 9.23 ± 1.35 mm), CAR (men: 37.18 ± 2.70 mm; women: 33.04 ± 3.15 mm), and HHR (men: 22.65 ± 1.44 mm; women: 20.53 ± 0.95 mm). Additionally, both SOA and ASOA showed positive and linear correlations with AHD, CHD, CAR, and HHR (R: 0.304-0.494, all p < 0.05). This study provides physiologic reference values of SOA and ASOA in the Chinese population, highlighting the sex differences and the correlations with shoulder anatomical parameters.

Pre-operative arthritic glenoid assessment: 3D automated planning software versus manual multiplanar measurements of version and inclination

Background

Preoperative CT-based planning is established in shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Automated planning software has become available to assist the surgeon and may increase reliability and efficiency. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of an automated 3-dimensional (3D) planning software package (Blueprint™ v2.1.5, Wright Medical Ltd) in the assessment of the arthritic shoulder against manual multiplanar measurement (MM).

Methods

74 CT studies acquired for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning were reviewed on two occasions by four different evaluators, taking manual measurement (MM) of glenoid version and inclination adjusted with multiplanar reformation and adhering to modified Freidman and Maurier methods. 15 scans were not processed by Blueprint due to incompatible scanning protocols or severe scapular dysmorphia. 59 Blueprint measures were compared with the manual data.

Results

Version: Intra-observer reliability of glenoid version MM was excellent (mean ICC 0.92). Inter-observer reliability between all four readers was good (ICC 0.89). A Bland-Altman analysis of Blueprint versus MM for version measurements demonstrated a mean pair difference of -5.77 (95% CI -7.25 to 4.29). Inclination: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were good (ICC 0.85 and 0.80 respectively). Blueprint and MM values for inclination followed a more convergent pattern than for version. Bland-Altman analysis for inclination did not show substantial bias, with a mean pair difference of 1.4 (95% CI -0.1 to 2.9).

Conclusion

Manual preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty is time consuming and requires experience. Automated 3D planning offers a consistent tool to assist the surgeon, notwithstanding intra-operative anatomical and technical variation, and margin of error. Surgeons should as ever be mindful of the specifics of a given automated program and our data quantified a bias for retroversion which may be important for measures close to the thresholds for augmentation or customised implants.

In Vivo Anatomical Research by 3D CT Reconstruction Determines Minimum Acromiohumeral, Coracohumeral, and Glenohumeral Distances in the Human Shoulder: Evaluation of Age and Sex Association in a Sample of the Chinese Population

Accurate measurement of the minimum distance between bony structures of the humeral head and the acromion or coracoid helps advance a better understanding of the shoulder anatomical features. Our goal was to precisely determine the minimum acromiohumeral distance (AHD), coracohumeral distance (CHD), and glenohumeral distance (GHD) in a sample of the Chinese population as an in vivo anatomical analysis. We retrospectively included 146 patients who underwent supine computed tomography (CT) examination of the shoulder joint. The minimum AHD, CHD, and GHD values were quantitatively measured using three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction techniques. The correlation between minimum AHD, CHD, and GHD value and age with different sexes was evaluated using Pearson Correlation Coefficient. The mean value of minimum AHD in males was greater than that in females (male 7.62 ± 0.98 mm versus female 7.27 ± 0.86 mm, p = 0.046). The CHD among different sexes differed significantly (male 10.75 ± 2.40 mm versus female 8.76 ± 1.38 mm, p < 0.001). However, we found no statistical differences in GHD with different sexes (male 2.00 ± 0.31 mm versus female 1.96 ± 0.36 mm, p > 0.05). In terms of age correlation, a negative curve correlation existed between age and AHD among the different sexes (male R2 = 0.124, p = 0.030, female R2 = 0.112, p = 0.005). A negative linear correlation was found in CHD among the different sexes (male R2 = 0.164, p < 0.001, female R2 = 0.122, p = 0.005). There were no differences between age and minimum GHD in both sexes. The 3D CT reconstruction model can accurately measure the minimum AHD, CHD, and GHD value in vivo and is worthy of further investigation for standard clinical anatomical assessment. Aging may correlate with AHD and CHD narrowing for both sexes.

Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning

Objective

To verify whether reverse baseplate positioning without the support of intraoperative three-dimensional technology is within the acceptable parameters in the literature and whether glenoid bone deformity (GBD) compromises this positioning.

Methods

Sixty-nine reverse shoulder arthroplasties were evaluated with volumetric computed tomography (CT). Two radiologists performed blinded CT scan analysis and evaluated baseplate position within 2mm of the inferior glenoid; the inclination and version of the baseplate in relation to the Friedman line; and upper and lower screw and baseplate metallic peg end point positionings. The patients were divided according to the presence of GBD for statistical analyses.

Results

The two radiologists concurred reasonably in their interpretations of the following analyzed parameters: baseplate position within 2mm of the inferior glenoid rim (97.1% and 95.7%), baseplate inclination (82.6% and 81.2%), baseplate version (69.6% and 56.5%), the upper screw reaching the base of the coracoid process (71% and 79.7%), the inferior screw remaining inside the scapula (88.4% and 84.1%), and the metallic peg of the baseplate considered intraosseous (88.4% and 72.5%).

Conclusion

Reverse baseplate positioning without intraoperative three-dimensional technology is within the acceptable parameters of the literature, except for baseplate version and upper screw position. GBD did not interfere with baseplate positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Three-dimensional geometry of the normal shoulder: a software analysis

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) geometry of the normal glenohumeral bone anatomy and relations is poorly documented. Our aims were (1) to determine the 3D geometry of the normal glenohumeral joint (GHJ) with reference to the scapular body plane and (2) to identify spatial correlations between the orientation and direction of the humeral head and the glenoid.

METHODS

Computed tomographies (CTs) of the normal, noninjured GHJ were collected from patients who had undergone CTs in the setting of (1) polytrauma, (2) traumatic head injury, (3) chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations, and (4) unilateral trauma with a contralateral normal shoulder. We performed 3D segmentation and measurements with a fully automatic software (Glenosys; Imascap). Measurements were made in reference to the scapular body plane and its transverse axis. Geometric measurements included version, inclination, direction, orientation, best-fit sphere radius (BFSR), humeral subluxation, critical shoulder angle, reverse shoulder angle, glenoid area, and glenohumeral distance. Statistical correlations were sought between glenoid and humeral 3D measurements (Pearson correlation).

RESULTS

A total of 122 normal GHJs (64 men, 58 women, age: 52 ± 17 years) were studied. The glenoid BFSR was always larger than the humerus BFSR (constant factor of 1.5, standard deviation = 0.2). The mean glenoid version and inclination were -6° ± 4° and 7° ± 5°, respectively. Men and women were found to have significantly different values for inclination (6° vs. 9°, P = .02), but not for version. Humeral subluxation was 59% ± 7%, with a linear correlation with glenoid retroversion (r = -0.70, P < .001) regardless of age. There was a significant and linear correlation between glenoid and humeral orientation and direction (r = 0.72 and r = 0.70, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The 3D geometry of the glenoid and humeral head present distinct limits in normal shoulders that can be set as references in daily practice: version and inclination are -6° and 7°, respectively, and humeral posterior subluxation is 59%; interindividual variations, regardless of the size, are relative to the scapular plane. There exists a strong correlation between the position of the humeral head and the glenoid orientation and direction.

The influence of posture and scapulothoracic orientation on the choice of humeral component retrotorsion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The literature suggests implantation of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in 0°-40° of retrotorsion without further specification. We hypothesized that optimal humeral component retrotorsion to avoid notching and gain balanced rotational capacity would depend on scapular position and posture.

METHODS

We investigated 200 shoulders in 100 patients with available whole-body computed tomography scans and created 3-dimensional models. Implantation of a humeral component in 20° of retrotorsion was simulated, and a correction angle (CA) to yield perfect opposition to the glenosphere was calculated. Patient-specific variables such as age, sex, posture, and scapular orientation parameters were correlated with this CA.

RESULTS

Scapular orientation showed large interindividual differences. A highly significant correlation was seen between the CA and scapular internal rotation (R = 0.71, P < .001) and protraction (R = 0.39, P < .001). When the CA was adjusted for glenoid retroversion, the correlation coefficient of scapular internal rotation increased even further (R = 0.91, P < .001). Scapular internal rotation itself showed a correlation with thoracic kyphosis (R = 0.27, P < .001), protraction (R = 0.57, P < .001), tilt (R = 0.29, P < .001), and scapular translation (R = -0.23, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Scapular orientation and posture should be integrated into the determination process of humeral component retrotorsion in RTSA. In theory, implantation of the humeral component with increased retrotorsion leads to improved neutral opposition of the RTSA components in patients with extensive internal rotation of the scapula. On the basis of varying scapular internal rotation, we propose the distinction of 3 different posture types (A-C) for enhanced appraisal of scapulothoracic orientation.

An interpopulation comparison of 3-dimensional morphometric measurements of the proximal humerus

Background

Precise anatomic reconstruction of the proximal humerus is essential to a favorable outcome of total shoulder arthroplasty. Because of the wide variation in the geometric features of the proximal humerus, prosthetic designs incorporating these disparities are being developed.

Methods

The aim of this study is to use data obtained from cadavers and computed tomographic scans to investigate the 3-dimensional morphometric parameters of the proximal humerus of South African and Swiss samples and make an interpopulation comparison. In addition, the study combines the interarticular variations between populations with the differences in sex and shoulder sides. With the aid of medical imaging techniques and engineering design tools, various geometric features were measured.

Results

The results obtained from these analyses revealed several differences in sex and shoulder sides. On average, the Swiss were larger in most of the measured parameters than the South Africans. The male shoulders of Swiss and South Africans were observed to significantly vary in 4 of the parameters measured. The South African male and female right shoulders varied considerably in one-fourth of the measured shoulder variables. Generally, for both populations, the left and right shoulders of the same individuals were not different in all the measured variables irrespective of sex.

Conclusion

The knowledge acquired in this study is expected to assist in the development of a population-specific shoulder prosthetic design and surgical planning procedures.

The Muscle Cross-sectional Area on MRI of the Shoulder Can Predict Muscle Volume: An MRI Study in Cadavers

BACKGROUND

Muscle volume is important in shoulder function. It can be used to estimate shoulder muscle balance in health, pathology, and repair and is indicative of strength based on muscle size. Although prior studies have shown that muscle area on two-dimensional (2-D) images correlates with three-dimensional (3-D) muscle volume, they have not provided equations to predict muscle volume from imaging nor validation of the measurements.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We wished to create an algorithm that quickly, accurately, and reliably estimates the volume of the shoulder muscles using cross-sectional area on MR images with low error. Specifically, we wished to (1) determine which MR imaging planes provide the highest correlation between shoulder muscle cross-sectional area and volume; (2) derive equations to predict muscle volume from cross-sectional area and validate their predictive capability; and (3) quantify the reliability of muscle cross-sectional area measurement.

METHODS

Three-dimensional MRI was performed on 10 cadaver shoulders, with sample size chosen for comparison to prior studies of shoulder muscle volume and in consideration of the cost of comprehensive analysis, followed by dissection for muscle volume measurement via water displacement. From each MR series, 3-D models of the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles were generated, and 2-D slices of these muscle models were selected at defined anatomic landmarks. Linear regression equations were generated to predict muscle volume at the plane(s) with the highest correlation between volume and area and for planes identified in prior studies of muscle volume and area. Volume predictions from MR scans of six different cadaver shoulders were also made, after which they were dissected to quantify muscle volume. This validation population allowed the calculation of the predictive error compared with actual muscle volume. Finally, reliability of measuring muscle areas on MR images was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability, as measured between two observers at a single time point.

RESULTS

The rotator cuff planes with the highest correlation between volume and area were the sum of the glenoid face and the midpoint of the scapula, and for the deltoid, it was the transverse plane at the top of the greater tuberosity. Water and digital muscle volumes were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.993, error < 4%), and muscle areas correlated highly with volumes (r ≥ 0.992, error < 2%). All correlations had p < 0.001. Muscle volume was predicted with low mean error (< 10%). All intraclass correlation coefficients were > 0.925, suggesting high inter-rater reliability in determining muscle areas from MR images.

CONCLUSION

Deltoid and rotator cuff muscle cross-sectional areas can be reliably measured on MRI and predict muscle volumes with low error.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Using simple linear equations, 2-D muscle area measurements from common clinical image analysis software can be used to estimate 3-D muscle volumes from MR image data. Future studies should determine if these muscle volume estimations can be used in the evaluation of patient function, changes in shoulder health, and in populations with muscle atrophy. Additionally, these muscle volume estimation techniques can be used as inputs to musculoskeletal models examining kinetics and kinematics of humans that rely on subject-specific muscle architecture.

Morphologic variations of the scapula in 3-dimensions: a statistical shape model approach

BACKGROUND

Morphologic variations of the scapula and acromion have been found to be associated with shoulder pathology. This study used statistical shape modelling to quantify these variations in healthy shoulders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A statistical shape model of the scapula was created using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions of 108 survey-confirmed nonpathologic shoulders of 54 patients. The mean shape and the 95% confidence interval were calculated and analyzed in the first 5 shape modes.

RESULTS

The first 5 shape modes consisted of consecutively sized (72% of total variation), rotation of the coracoacromial complex (5%), acromial shape and slope (4%), shape of the scapular spine (2%), and acromial overhang (2%).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In healthy shoulders, a certain variation in rotation of the coracoacromial complex and in acromial shape and slope was observed. These new parameters might be correlated with shoulder pathology such as glenohumeral osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tears.

The Normal 3D Gleno-humeral Relationship and Anatomy of the Glenoid Planes

Knowledge of the normal and pathological three-dimensional (3D) gleno-humeral relationship is imperative when planning and performing a total shoulder arthroplasty. Currently, two-dimensional (2D) parameters are used to describe this anatomy and despite the fact that these 2D measurements have a wide distribution in the normal population, they are commonly accepted. This broad distribution can be explained on one hand by anatomical factors and on the other hand, by positional errors. A 3D CT-scan reconstruction and evaluation can overcome this shortcoming and can be used to determine more accurately the surgical planes on the normal and pathological shoulder joint. There is, however, no consensus on which references should be used when studying this 3D relationship. This thesis describes the normal 3D gleno-humeral relationship and the best glenoid plane to use in surgery, based on 3D CT-scan. Furthermore, a glenoid aiming device that can be of surgical help in the reconstruction of the normal glenoid anatomy was developed based on these measurements.

The three-dimensional glenohumeral subluxation index in primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder

BACKGROUND

Assessment of glenohumeral subluxation is essential in preoperative planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 3-dimensional (3D) glenohumeral subluxation index (GHSI) in shoulders with primary osteoarthritis (OA) and its relationship with morbid glenoid retroversion.

METHODS

The 3D computed tomography reconstructions of 120 healthy shoulders and 110 shoulders with primary glenohumeral arthritis (OA group), classified according to Walch's glenoid morphology, were analyzed. The 3D GHSI was assessed by measuring posterior decentering of the humeral head in relation to the native glenoid in each subject, and its correlation to morbid glenoid version was calculated.

RESULTS

The reproducible 3D GHSI (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.842) showed a posterior decentering of the humeral head in the OA population and in each type of glenoid morphology (P ≤ .005). A moderate correlation was observed in the OA group (r = -0.542; P < .001), but weak linear relationships were found for different glenoid morphology types (r between 0.041 and -0.307). Type A shoulders (r = -0.375; P = .006) correlated better than type B shoulders (r =  -0.217; P = .104). After shoulders were subcategorized according to a threshold for 3D subluxation, the posteriorly subluxated group increased its correlation (r = -0.438; P < .001), whereas the centered shoulders still exhibited no relationship (r = -0.192; P = .329).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior humeral head decentering in relation to the native glenoid is present in each glenoid morphology type. Grouping measures according to morphology type and 3D subluxation showed at best moderate correlations between morbid version and 3D GHSI.

Quantitative Anatomical Differences in the Shoulder

This study explored the radiographic and anatomical differences in normal shoulders between men and women, as well as factors such as race, height, weight, and age. A total of 205 patients with documented normal anatomical radiographs comprised the study population. Five fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon reviewers measured head diameter, humeral head size, head to tuberosity distance, greater tuberosity width, neck-shaft angle, surface-arc angle, glenoid neck length, and distance from the lateral acromion process to the greater tuberosity on anteroposterior radiographs with the shoulder in external rotation. After the reviewers identified and marked defined anatomical landmarks, a comprehensive automated calculator was used to compute all parameters. Between men and women, head diameter (P<.001), humeral head size (P<.001), greater tuberosity width (P<.001), distance from the lateral acromion process to the greater tuberosity (P<.001), and glenoid neck length (P<.001) were significantly different, whereas race was not significantly different for any anatomical parameter. Using Spearman's rho, there was a strong correlation between head diameter/humeral head height and height (r_s=0.77/r_s=0.68), weight (r_s =0.62), and greater tuberosity width (r_s=0.66/r_s= 0.61); there also was a strong negative correlation between head to tuberosity distance and neck-shaft angle (r_s=-0.80). This study demonstrated precisely defined proximal humeral anatomical relationships and sizes using an advanced standardized imaging software program. With these data, orthopedic surgeons and implant designers can better understand the anatomy and glenohumeral relationships to re-create when performing total shoulder arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):155-160.].

Distinct Proximal Humeral Geometry in Chinese Population and Clinical Relevance

BACKGROUND

Replicating humeral anatomy during shoulder arthroplasty is important for good patient outcomes. The proximal humeral geometry of the Chinese population has been rarely reported. We analyzed the geometry of the proximal part of the humerus in Chinese subjects and compared it with that of Western populations and the dimensions of available prostheses.

METHODS

Eighty healthy Chinese subjects underwent computed tomography (CT)-arthrography. Three-dimensional (3D) digital humeral and glenoid models were reconstructed, and geometric parameters were measured. Humeral measurements included the radius of curvature, articular surface diameter and thickness, anterior-posterior/superior-inferior (AP/SI) articular surface diameter ratio, articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio, surface arc, inclination angle, retroversion angle, and medial and posterior offsets. Glenoid measurements included SI length, AP length, SI radius, and AP radius.

RESULTS

The average radius of curvature (and standard deviation) of the humeral head was 22.1 ± 1.9 mm, the articular surface diameter averaged 42.9 ± 3.6 mm, and the articular surface thickness averaged 16.9 ± 1.5 mm. There was strong linear correlation between the articular surface diameter and thickness (r = 0.696, p = 0.001), with a linear regression relationship of thickness = 0.357 × diameter + 1.615. The AP/SI articular surface diameter ratio averaged 0.93 ± 0.03; the articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio, 0.77 ± 0.05; the surface arc, 153° ± 5.6°; the inclination angle, 133° ± 3.1°; and the retroversion angle, 22.6° ± 10.2°. The medial and posterior offsets averaged 6.3 ± 0.9 mm and 0.4 ± 0.78 mm, respectively; the SI and AP lengths, 30.15 ± 3.70 mm and 20.35 ± 2.56 mm; and the SI and AP radii, 23.49 ± 2.48 mm and 25.54 ± 3.07 mm. Compared with the Western population, the Chinese cohort had a smaller radius of curvature (p < 0.001), smaller articular surface diameter (p = 0.009), larger articular surface thickness/radius of curvature ratio (p < 0.001), larger surface arc (p < 0.001), smaller inclination angle (p < 0.001), and smaller posterior offset (p < 0.001). Unlike the Western population, the Chinese population had higher glenohumeral conformity in the coronal plane than in the axial plane. Many manufacturers' shoulder prostheses do not adequately cover the range of humeral head dimensions in our Chinese cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The geometric parameters of the humeri in the Chinese population differ from those in other populations. These differences have clinical relevance with regard to implant design and arthroplasty technique and likely affect clinical outcomes.

Description and reproducibility assessment of a new computerised tomography scan index to measure the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior glenoid surface

PURPOSE

To propose and to assess the reproducibility of a new method (GO [glenoid orientation] index) for the estimation of the glenoid orientation in relation to the anterior surface of the glenoid.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study on computed tomography (CT) scan. The GO index was defined as the angle formed by a line perpendicular to the tangent to the anterior surface of the scapula and the glenoid line (which is defined as the line connecting the anterior and the posterior rim of the glenoid). The measurements were performed at the level of the glenoid where its diameter is the greatest. Two independent observers performed each measurement twice. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated by the Pearson coefficient (r) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ρ, ICC). The correlation between GO index and glenoid version as described by Friedman was also studied.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight CT scans were analysed, 38 shoulders with glenohumeral arthritis and 40 healthy shoulders, 32 females/46 males, mean age 53.9 ± 22.7 years. The measures were all highly correlated (r > 0.50, p = 0.00001). The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was good to excellent (0.71 < ρ < 0.84, p = 0.00001). GO index was 26.9 ± 6.3°, 28.4 ± 6° in the group with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and 25.5 ± 6.4° in the healthy group, p = 0.04. The glenoid version was -0.8 ± 7.9° in the group with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and -3.9 ± 6° in the healthy group, p = 0.05. No agreement was found between the glenoid version and GO index.

CONCLUSIONS

GO index is simple and reproducible. It could be very useful for the pre-operative planning and intra-operative positioning of the implants in total shoulder arthroplasty.

A three-dimensional comparative study on the scapulohumeral relationship in normal and osteoarthritic shoulders

BACKGROUND

Eccentric loading due to humeral translation is associated with worse clinical outcomes in hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional relationship of the humeral head to the scapula (scapulohumeral relationship) in nonpathologic shoulders and in shoulders with primary osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography scans of 151 nonpathologic shoulders (control group) and 110 shoulders with primary glenohumeral arthritis (OA group) were analyzed by measuring the anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, and medial-lateral position of the humeral head in relation to the scapula. Shoulders were classified as centered (type A) or posteriorly subluxed (type B) according to the Walch classification of glenoid morphology. Reproducibility and differences in scapulohumeral relationship were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The scapulohumeral relationship could be determined reliably: the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged between 0.780 and 0.978; the typical error of measurement ranged between 2.4% and 5.0%. Both type A and type B shoulders showed significant posterior translation of the humeral head (P <.001). Type B shoulders had significantly more posterior translation than type A shoulders (P <.001). A tendency of inferior translation was noted, although with only marginal statistical significance (P = .051). In each morphology class, a medial deviation of the humeral head, representing a reduced glenohumeral distance, was measured (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The main characteristics of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis are posterior humeral head translation relative to the scapula, reduced glenohumeral distance, and a tendency toward inferior humeral head translation in both type A and type B shoulders.

The effect of glenoid cavity depth on rotator cuff tendinitis

INTRODUCTION

Some of the most important causes of shoulder pain are inflammation and degenerative changes in the rotator cuff (RC). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive and safe imaging modality. MRI can be used for the evaluation of cuff tendinopathy. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between glenoid cavity depth and cuff tendinopathy and we investigated glenoid cavity depth on the pathogenesis of cuff tendinopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 215 patients who underwent MRI. Of these, 60 patients showed cuff tendinopathy (group A) and 54 patients showed no pathology (group B). Glenoid cavity depth was calculated in the coronal and transverse planes.

RESULTS

The mean axial depth was 1.7 ± 0.9 and the mean coronal depth 3.8 ± 0.9, for group A. The mean axial depth was 3.5 ± 0.7 and the mean coronal depth 1.5 ± 0.8, for group B. There were significant differences in the axial and coronal depths between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

High coronal and low axial depth of the glenoid cavity can be used to diagnose RC tendinitis.

Rocking-horse phenomenon of the glenoid component: the importance of inclination

BACKGROUND

Abnormal glenoid version positioning has been recognized as a cause of glenoid component failure caused by the rocking horse phenomenon. In contrast, the importance of the glenoid inclination has not been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The computed tomography scans of 152 healthy shoulders were evaluated. A virtual glenoid component was positioned in 2 different planes: the maximum circular plane (MCP) and the inferior circle plane (ICP). The MCP was defined by the best fitting circle of the most superior point of the glenoid and 2 points at the lower glenoid rim. The ICP was defined by the best fitting circle on the rim of the inferior quadrants. The inclination of both planes was measured as the intersection with the scapular plane. We defined the force vector of the rotator force couple and calculated the magnitude of the shear force vector on a virtual glenoid component in both planes during glenohumeral abduction.

RESULTS

The inclination of the component positioned in the MCP averaged 95° (range, 84°-108°) and for the ICP averaged 111° (range, 94°-126°). A significant reduction in shear forces was calculated for the glenoid component in the ICP vs the MCP: 98% reduction in 60° of abduction to 49% reduction in 90° of abduction.

CONCLUSION

Shear forces are significantly higher when the glenoid component is positioned in the MCP compared with the ICP, and this is more pronounced in early abduction. Positioning the glenoid component in the inferior circle might reduce the risk of a rocking horse phenomenon.

Anterior Shoulder Instability Is Associated With an Underlying Deficiency of the Bony Glenoid Concavity

PURPOSE

To determine whether anterior shoulder instability is associated with an inherent deficiency of the bony glenoid concavity, which results in a reduced bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR).

METHODS

In this case-control study, we searched the institutional database for patients treated for unilateral recurrent anterior shoulder instability. We included 30 consecutive patients with atraumatic instability, 30 consecutive patients with traumatic instability, and 36 matched healthy controls, for a total of 96 shoulders. Computed tomography images of the unaffected shoulders of the instability patients were compared with images of the ipsilateral shoulders of age- and sex-matched healthy controls for differences in glenoid morphology. By use of a mathematical formula based on Pythagorean trigonometric identities, the mean BSSRs of the different groups were calculated and compared. Validation of the formula was accomplished by finite element analysis.

RESULTS

The mean BSSR of atraumatic instability patients was 17.9% ± 8.5% and therefore significantly lower than the mean BSSR of 31.1% ± 7.5% of the control group (13.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1% to 17.4%; P < .001). The mean BSSR of the traumatic instability group was higher, at 23.9% ± 8.5% (P = .007), but still showed a deficit of 7.2% (95% CI, 2.8% to 11.7%; P = .002) compared with controls. The atraumatic instability group showed a mean reduction of 0.9 mm (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.1 mm; P < .001) in concavity depth and a decrease of 2.9° (95% CI, 0.4° to 5.3°; P = .021) in concavity retroversion, whereas the traumatic instability patients had a reduction of 0.4 mm (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.8 mm; P = .006) in concavity depth. Neither of the instability groups differed significantly from their respective controls in terms of glenoid concavity diameter, head radius, or glenoid vault morphology.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior shoulder instability is associated with an inherent flattening of the bony glenoid concavity, which significantly decreases the BSSR. The deficiency appears to be more pronounced in patients with atraumatic instability than in patients with traumatic instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Accuracy of the glenohumeral subluxation index in nonpathologic shoulders

BACKGROUND

Correction of posterior humeral subluxation, measured by the humeral subluxation index (HSI) according to Walch, is necessary in total shoulder arthroplasty to prevent early loosening. The 3-dimensional (3D) measurement of the shoulder is becoming well accepted and common practice as it overcomes positional errors to which 2-dimensional (2D) glenohumeral measurements are prone. The first objective was to describe the HSI in a nonpathologic population with the 2D HSI according to Walch and a newly described 3D HSI method. The second objective was to compare both measuring methods with each other.

METHODS

In 151 nonpathologic shoulders, the 2D HSI was measured on the midaxial computed tomography scan cut of the scapula. The 3D HSI, based on the native glenoid plane, was defined as [formula in text], in which X is the projection of the center of the humeral head to the anteroposterior axis of the glenoid fossa and R is the radius of the humeral head. Both measuring methods were compared with each other. Correlation was determined. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the 3D HSI was measured.

RESULTS

The mean 3D HSI (51.5% ± 2.7%) was significantly (P < .001) more posterior than the mean 2D HSI (48.7% ± 5.2%), with a mean difference of 2.9% ± 5.6%. No correlation was found between the 2D and 3D HSI. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was excellent.

CONCLUSION

The 2D HSI seems to underestimate the humeral subluxation compared with a 3D reliable equivalent.

Diagnostic value of active protraction and retraction for sternoclavicular joint pain

Background

Sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) arthropathy is an uncommon cause of mechanical pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of two active clinical tests for localizing the sternoclavicular joint as the source of mechanical pain.

Methods

All patients between June 2011 and October 2013 that visited the orthopedic departments of three hospitals with atraumatic pain in the area of the SC joint were evaluated. Local swelling, pain at palpation, pain during arm elevation and two newly described tests (pain during active scapular protraction and retraction) were evaluated. CT images were evaluated. The patients were then divided into two groups according to whether they had a ≥50% decrease in pain following the SCJ injection. Sensitivity and specificity for local swelling, the four clinical tests and CT-scan were measured.

Results

Forty eight patients were included in this study and SC joint pain was confirmed in 44. The tests with highest sensitivity were pain on palpation, (93% sensitivity) and pain during active scapular protraction (86%). CT-scan showed a sensitivity of 84%. Local swelling showed a high specificity (100%).

Conclusion

Pain at the SCJ during active scapular protraction is a good clinical diagnostic tool for SC arthropathy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-421) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Morphologic features of humeral head and glenoid version in the normal glenohumeral joint

BACKGROUND

The morphologic features and clinical significance of version of the humeral head and glenoid remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the normal values of humeral head version and glenoid version on computed tomography scans and to clarify their features in the normal glenohumeral joint.

METHODS

Images for analysis were computed tomography scans of 410 normal shoulders from healthy volunteers. Values of humeral head and glenoid version were measured. In glenoid version measurement, 3-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed to eliminate scapular inclination. Differences in humeral head version and glenoid version were assessed between dominant and nondominant shoulders and between men and women. Correlation analyses were also performed in the values of version between dominant and nondominant shoulders and between humeral head version and glenoid version.

RESULTS

The values of humeral head retroversion were widely distributed from -2° to 60°, with an average of 26° ± 11°. Average glenoid retroversion was 1° ± 3°, ranging from -9° to 13°. Both humeral head retroversion and glenoid retroversion were significantly higher on the dominant side than on the nondominant side and significantly higher in men than in women. Humeral head version and glenoid version values were well correlated with those of the contralateral shoulder. No correlation was found between humeral head version and glenoid version.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found differences in humeral head version and glenoid version by sex and shoulder dominance in a large sample. Both the humeral head and glenoid are thought to be more retroverted in high-demand shoulders.

Structure modeling of the glenoid: Relevance to shoulder arthroplasty

We applied shape modeling and principal component analysis (PCA) to discover glenoid bone structural relationships relevant to improving glenoid prosthesis features, fixation, and instrumentation. Knowledge of external bone morphology guides prosthesis shape and positioning, while internal bone morphology and bone density influence fixation. CT-based modeling defined nonarthritic glenoid subchondral bone surface and internal structure. First and second principal shape components were related to size and density. Reproducible structural parameters and glenoid feature relationships were discovered. Subchondral bone surface was approximated by a circle inferiorly and a triangle superiorly with the circle's center at a reproducible point along a superior-inferior line. Glenoid vault's maximum depth was at the circle's center, and the highest bone density was in posterior glenoid. Glenoid subchondral bone surface version varied from superior to inferior, but not by sex or side. Male subchondral bone surfaces were larger and more retroverted. Even if subchondral bone surfaces are deformed by arthritis, glenoid morphology can be identified by extra-articular landmarks, permitting location of the glenoid center and scapular orientation (glenoid version). Knowledge obtained from this study directs design of novel prosthesis features and instrumentation for use without pre-op CT or computer aided surgery.

Evaluation of the muscle volumes of the transverse rotator cuff force couple in nonpathologic shoulders

BACKGROUND

The balance between the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor muscles, often referred to as the rotator cuff transverse force couple (TFC), has been proposed to be a critical component for normal shoulder function. The relationship between the muscle volume and the power means that TFC can be evaluated with the measurement of the muscle volume of the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor. The aim of this study is to evaluate an innovative computed tomography (CT)-based technique to measure the muscle volume and to evaluate if there is a significant difference between muscle volumes of both the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor in nonpathologic shoulders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT images of 27 shoulders (21 patients) with a full scapula and a proximal humeral head were evaluated. Two volume masks (subscapularis and infraspinatus/teres minor) were calculated on the basis of the assigned muscle contours on the transverse slices. The intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficient was calculated.

RESULTS

The intraobserver and interobserver correlation coefficient was excellent. The correlation between the anterior and posterior part of the TFC was strong. There was no significant difference between the volume masks.

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle volume of the TCF can be quantified using CT images. In nonpathologic shoulders, there is no significant difference between the muscle volume of the anterior (subscapularis) and posterior part (teres minor/infraspinatus) of the TFC.

Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version

BACKGROUND

The conventional measuring method for glenoid version is greatly influenced by the scapular body shape that varies widely between patients. We postulated that the glenoid vault version could be more useful than the conventional glenoid version in clinical cases.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to compare the values of glenoid version measured with the conventional method to those with the vault method and to investigate the feasibility of the glenoid vault version.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 150 normal shoulders and 150 arthritic shoulders were analyzed. Three-dimensionally corrected slices were reconstructed from the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data, and glenoid version was measured with both the conventional and vault methods. After determining intra- and interrater reliabilities, differences in glenoid version values between the conventional and vault methods were assessed. In the normal shoulder group, side-to-side differences of glenoid version values were also evaluated in both methods.

RESULTS

Both measuring methods demonstrated high intra- and interrater reliabilities. The normal glenoid had 1.1° ± 3.2° retroversion with the conventional method and 8.9° ± 2.7° retroversion with the vault method. The average glenoid retroversion of arthritic shoulders was 10.8° ± 9.3° measured with the conventional method and 18.2° ± 9.1° with the vault method. The vault method showed significantly larger glenoid retroversion than the conventional method in both normal and arthritic shoulder groups. Both conventional glenoid retroversion and glenoid vault retroversion were significantly larger on dominant sides than on nondominant sides in the normal shoulders.

CONCLUSIONS

The glenoid vault version could be used as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version with high reliability. In clinical use, the glenoid vault version appears to be more useful than the conventional glenoid version to assess the severity of arthritis and difficulty of glenoid replacement. The glenoid vault is not symmetric, but usually retroverted in both normal and arthritic shoulders.

Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

A common disadvantage of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is limitation of the range of arm rotation. Several changes to the prosthesis design and implantation technique have been suggested to improve rotation range of motion (ROM).

HYPOTHESIS

Glenoid component design and degree of humeral component retroversion influence rotation ROM after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Aequalis Reversed™ shoulder prosthesis (Tornier Inc., Edina, MN, USA) was implanted into 40 cadaver shoulders. Eight glenoid component combinations were tested, five with the 36-mm sphere (centred seating, eccentric seating, inferior tilt, centred with a 5-mm thick lateralised spacer, and centred with a 7-mm thick lateralised spacer) and three with the 42-mm sphere (centred with no spacer or with a 7-mm or 10-mm spacer). Humeral component position was evaluated with 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° of retroversion. External and internal rotation ROMs to posterior and anterior impingement on the scapular neck were measured with the arm in 20° of abduction.

RESULTS

The large glenosphere (42 mm) was associated with significantly (P<0.05) greater rotation ROMs, particularly when combined with a lateralised spacer (46° internal and 66° external rotation). Rotation ROMs were smallest with the 36-mm sphere. Greater humeral component retroversion was associated with a decrease in internal rotation and a significant increase (P<0.05) in external rotation. The best balance between rotation ROMs was obtained with the native retroversion, which was estimated at 17.5° on average in this study.

DISCUSSION

Our anatomic study in a large number of cadavers involved a detailed and reproducible experimental protocol. However, we did not evaluate the variability in scapular anatomy. Earlier studies of the influence of technical parameters did not take humeral component retroversion into account. In addition, no previous studies assessed rotation ROMs.

CONCLUSION

Rotation ROM should be improved by the use of a large-diameter glenosphere with a spacer to lateralise the centre of rotation of the gleno-humeral joint, as well as by positioning the humeral component at the patient's native retroversion value.

Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship

OBJECTIVE

Knowledge of the normal and pathological three-dimensional glenohumeral relationship is imperative when planning and performing a total shoulder arthroplasty. There is, however, no consensus on which references should be used when studying this relationship. The purpose of the present study was to define the most suitable glenoid plane with normally distributed parameters, narrowest variability, and best reproducibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstruction CT scans were performed on 152 healthy shoulders. Four glenoid planes, each determined by three surgically accessible bony reference points, were determined. Two planes were triangular, with the same base defined by the most anterior and posterior point of the glenoid. The most inferior and the most superior point of the glenoid, respectively, define the top of Saller's inferior plane and the Saller's superior plane. The two other planes are formed by best-fitting circles. The circular max plane is defined by the superior tubercle, and two points at the distal third of the glenoid. The circular inferior plane is defined by three points at the rim of the inferior quadrants of the glenoid.

RESULTS

The parameters of all four planes behave normally. The humeral center of rotation is identically positioned for both the circular max and circular inferior plane (X = 91.71°/X = 91.66° p = 0.907 and Y = 90.83°/Y = 91.7° p = 0.054, respectively) and different for the Saller's inferior and Saller's superior plane (p ≤ 0.001). The circular inferior plane has the lowest variability to the coronal scapular plane (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides arguments to use the circular inferior glenoid plane as preferred reference plane of the glenoid.

Operative guidelines for the reconstruction of the native glenoid plane: an anatomic three-dimensional computed tomography-scan reconstruction study

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the native plane in biconcave eroded glenoids is difficult. Nevertheless, accurate reconstruction of this plane is imperative for successful total shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to determine guidelines that can increase the accuracy of glenoid component positioning.

METHODS

Three different circular planes were determined on 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans of 152 healthy shoulders. First, the circular max (CM) plane is formed with the superior tubercle and 2 points, 1 anterior and 1 posterior, at the rim of the inferior third of the glenoid. Second, the circular inferior (CI) plane is formed by 3 points at the inferior 2 quadrants of the glenoid rim. Third, the circular minima (Cm) plane is formed with 3 points situated at the noneroded sector of the anterior glenoid. The angulation of the spinal scapular axis (SSA), the line between the most medial point of the scapular spine and the center of the three different glenoid planes, and the correlation coefficient between the radius of the circle and the length of SSA are calculated.

RESULTS

Angle SSA in the x-axis were 94°, 93°, 93° and in the y-axis were 95°, 111°, and 111° for CM, CI, and Cm, respectively. Correlation coefficient between the radius of the circle and the length of SSA: r = 0.69 for CM, r = 0.75 for CI, and r = 0.75 for Cm.

CONCLUSION

Three points situated at the native anterior glenoid can reconstruct, within 2° accuracy (95% confidence interval, 1.8°-2.3°), the CI plane. A relationship exists between the radii of the 3 glenoid circles and the width of the scapula (SSA length).

Morphology of the normal and arthritic glenoid

The normal glenoid has a pear-shape aspect and is slightly retroverted. It has a variable orientation in the sagittal plane. The cartilage surface area corresponds to 28 % of the area of the humeral head with a radius of curvature greater than the humeral head. Mechanical properties are significantly higher at the center and posterior edge of the glenoid. With osteoarthritis, the glenoid becomes larger with a greater width and an increasing of the retroversion angle. The wear can be centric or excentric. Mechanical properties are significantly higher at the center and posterior edge of the glenoid.

A HUMERAL COORDINATE SYSTEM FOR IN VIVO 3-D KINEMATICS OF THE GLENOHUMERAL JOINT

The aim of this study was to define axes from clearly identifiable landmarks on the proximal aspect of the humerus and to compare these for reasonable best alternatives to the use of the humeral canal and elbow epicondylar axes to define a humeral coordinate frame (HCF). The elbow epicondylar axis (EC) and six different humeral canal axes (HC) based on varying lengths of humerus were quantified from 21 computed tomography (CT) scans of humeri. Six additional axes were defined using the proximal humerus only. These included a line from the center of a sphere fit on the humeral head to the 3D surface area centroid of the greater tubercle region, (GT). The inclinations of these axes relative to EC were calculated. GT was found to be the most closely aligned to EC (13.4° ± 6.8°). The inclinations of the other axes ranged from 36.3° to 86.8°. The HC axis orientation was found to be insensitive to humeral shaft lengths (variability, within average: 0.6°). This was chosen as one of two axes for the HCF. It was also the most inter-subject related axis to EC with inclination standard deviation of ±1.8°. EC was therefore predicted from this such that if the superior axis [1 0 0] of an image scan is maintained and the humerus rotated to make its quantified HC align superiorly in the direction [0.98 0.01 0.01], then its EC axis lies laterally in the direction [0 0 1]. This study demonstrates that it is possible with confidence to apply an orthogonal coordinate frame to the humerus based on proximal imaging data only.

An optimised method for quantifying glenoid orientation

A robust quantification method is essential for inter-subject glenoid comparison and planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. This study compared various scapular and glenoid axes with each other in order to optimally define the most appropriate method of quantifying glenoid version and inclination.Six glenoid and eight scapular axes were defined and quantified from identifiable landmarks of twenty-one scapular image scans. Pathology independency and insensitivity of each axis to inter-subject morphological variation within its region was tested. Glenoid version and inclination were calculated using the best axes from the two regions.The best glenoid axis was the normal to a least-square plane fit on the glenoid rim, directed approximately medio-laterally. The best scapular axis was the normal to a plane formed by the spine root and lateral border ridge. Glenoid inclination was 15.7 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees superiorly and version was 4.9 degrees +/- 6.1 degrees , retroversion.The choice of axes in the present technique makes it insensitive to pathology and scapular morphological variabilities. Its application would effectively improve inter-subject glenoid version comparison, surgical planning and design of prostheses for shoulder arthroplasty.

Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

HYPOTHESIS

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is growing in popularity for patients with deficient rotator cuffs; however, the phenomenon of scapular notching continues to be a concern. This study examined the effects of humeral component version in the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis (Tornier, Edina, MN) on impingement of the humeral prosthesis against the scapula to test the hypothesis that the mechanical contact of the humeral component with the scapular neck is influenced by the version of the humeral component.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven shoulders from deceased donors were tested after the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder was implanted. The deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi were loaded based on physiologic cross-sectional area. The degree of internal and external rotation when impingement, subluxation, or dislocation occurred was measured at 0°, 30°, and 60° glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Testing was performed with the humeral component placed in 20° of anteversion, neutral version, 20° of retroversion, and 40° of retroversion.

RESULTS

Maximum external rotation at 0° abduction was -1° ± 4° at 20° anteversion, 15° ± 3° at neutral, 28° ± 4° at 20° retroversion, and 44° ± 5° at 40° retroversion (P < .05). Maximum internal rotation at 0° abduction was 128° ± 9° at 20° anteversion, 112° ± 9° at neutral, 99° ± 8° at 20° retroversion, and 83° ± 8° at 40° retroversion (P < .05). Maximum external rotation at 30° abduction was 70° ± 6° at 20° anteversion, 84° ± 7° at neutral, 97° ± 6° at 20° retroversion, and 110° ± 5° at 40° retroversion (P < .05). There was no limitation to internal rotation at 30° abduction. No impingement occurred at 60° abduction.

DISCUSSION

Version of the humeral component plays a role in range of motion and impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Anteversion can significantly decrease the amount of external rotation achievable after reverse total shoulder surgery.

CONCLUSION

Placing the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder humeral component at between 20° and 40° of retroversion more closely restores a functional arc of motion without impingement.

Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements

HYPOTHESIS

There is concern regarding the accuracy of 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) for measuring glenoid version. Three-dimensional (3D) CT scan reconstructions can properly orient the glenoid to the plane of the scapula and have been reported to accurately measure glenoid version in cadaver models. We hypothesized that glenoid version measured by correcting 2D CT scans to the plane of the scapula by 3D reconstruction would be significantly different compared with standard 2D CT scan measurement of the glenoid in a clinical patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients underwent dedicated axial 2D CT scan of the shoulder with 3D reconstruction. The 2D glenoid version was measured on unmodified midglenoid axial cuts, and the 3D glenoid version measurement was corrected to be perpendicular to the plane of the scapula and then measured in the axial plane. Three observers repeated each measurement on 2 different days.

RESULTS

The difference between the overall average 2D and 3D measurements was not statistically significant (P = .45). In individual scapulae, 35% of 2D measurements were 5° to 10° different and 12% were greater than 10° different from their corresponding 3D-corrected CT measurement (P < .001 to P = .045). Reproducibility of both 2D and 3D-corrected measurements was good.

DISCUSSION

Although 2D and 3D corrected methods showed a high degree of both intraobserver and interobserver reliability in this series, axial 2D images without correction were 5 to 15 degrees different than their 3D-corrected counterparts in 47% of all measurements. Correcting 2D glenoid version by 3D reconstruction to the transverse plane perpendicular to the scapular body allows for an accurate assessment of glenoid version in spite of positioning differences and results in increased accuracy while maintaining high reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the variability in scapular position, the axial 2D CT scan measurement was significantly different from 3D-corrected measurement of glenoid version. Averaging the version measurements across patients did not reflect this finding.

Predicting normal glenoid version from the pathologic scapula: a comparison of 4 methods in 2- and 3-dimensional models

BACKGROUND

Correction of pathologic glenoid retroversion improves gleonhumeral mechanics and reduces glenoid component wear after total shoulder arthroplasty. Determining the amount of correction necessary can be difficult because of the wide range of normal glenoid version. We hypothesize that normal glenoid version can be predicted in a pathologic shoulder based on conserved relationships between the anterior glenoid wall, Resch angle, and the internal structures of the glenoid vault.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional (3-D) computer tomography (CT) scan-based measurements of the anterior glenoid wall angle (AGWA), Resch angle (RA), and glenoid version were made in 58 scapulae from the Haeman-Todd Osteological Collection (Museum of Natural History in Cleveland, OH) and 19 paired scapulae from patients with unilateral osteoarthritis. Linear regression equations derived from the AGWA and RA and from a computer-generated vault model were used to predict native (nonpathologic) glenoid version as defined by the 19 nonpathologic scapula.

RESULTS

Linear regression equations based on the measured AGWA or RA, as well as the glenoid vault model in the 19 pathologic scapulae, were able to accurately predict native glenoid version in the contralateral nonpathologic shoulder.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the ability to take 3-D CT scan-based measurements in a scapula with pathologic glenoid retroversion and predict the native (nonpathologic) glenoid version in the contralateral shoulder by using linear regression equations or a computer generated vault model. Such tools might assist in preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making to allow correction of pathologic glenoid retroversion.

Glenoid version: how to measure it? Validity of different methods in two-dimensional computed tomography scans

HYPOTHESIS

Recognition of the glenoid version is important for evaluation of different pathologies such as degenerative wear, shoulder instability, or congenital deformity. Surgical strategies can change significantly in the presence of major retroversion. There is no consensus on the method to use to evaluate version. This study compared different measurement strategies in 116 patients with shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans. We hypotheses that the methods will give different value for evolution.

METHODS

Shoulder axial CT images were reviewed, and the image inferior to the base of the coracoid was selected. The glenoid version was measured according to the Friedman method and the scapula body method. Three orthopedic surgeons independently examined the images 2 times, and intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation (ICC).

RESULTS

Group 1 (n = 53): The average glenoid version was significantly different between the 2 measurement techniques for all 3 observers, with an average of -7.29° for the scapula body method and -10.43° for Friedman method. For group 2 (B2 glenoid group, n = 63): The most reliable method for measurement of B2 glenoid (glenoid with posterior erosion) version was the association of the Friedman line for the scapula axis and the intermediate glenoid line, with excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC > 0.957) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.954).

DISCUSSION

The glenoid version measurement is reliable on a 2D CT Scan. According to correlation found in our paper and those of the literature it seems that there is no advantage on 3D CT Scan to assess version in terms of reliability of measures.

CONCLUSION

Combining the Friedman method to determine the scapula axis with an intermediate glenoid line in B2 glenoid yield the most reliable measurements.

Reliability of the glenoid plane

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3-dimensional (3-D) orientation of the glenoid and scapular planes. Different definitions of the glenoid plane were used and different planes measured, and we hypothesed that the 3-D plane with the least variation would be best to define the most reliable glenoid plane.

METHODS

We studied 150 CT scans from nonpathological shoulders from patients between 18 and 80. The scapular plane and 5 different glenoid planes were determined: inferior, anterior, posterior, superior, and neutral. All plane versions and inclination angles were measured. Because all examinations were done in a standardized position to the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes of the body, the scapular plane could be defined versus the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes of the body.

RESULTS

The version (mean, 3.76) of the inferior glenoid plane showed a significantly lower standard deviation than the version of the anterior (P < .001), posterior (P=.001), and superior (P=.001) glenoid plane (ANOVA). For inclination all planes have a similar variance. The scapular plane was different between gender (P=.022) and correlated with age.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the retroversion of the inferior glenoid is reasonably constant. The osseous anthropometry of the inferior glenoid can offer a reproducible point of reference to be used in prosthetic surgery of the shoulder.

Prosthetic component relationship of the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis in the transverse plane of the body

The Delta III (DePuy International Ltd, Leeds, UK) reverse total shoulder prosthesis has provided a successful functional outcome in cuff tear arthropathy (CTA); however, internal and external rotation remain compromised. Positioning of the prosthetic components in the transverse plane has theoretically been suggested to affect rotation. Twenty-seven patients who received a Delta III reversed total shoulder prosthesis for CTA were analyzed (mean follow-up, 43 months) using standard radiographs and computed tomography. The position of the prosthetic components and the possible influence of scapular rotation was analyzed using a uniform spatial reference system using axes in reference to the sagittal or coronal plane. We assessed impingement of the humeral component on the glenoid neck in neutral and internal rotation. An increase in the anterior divergence of the glenoid and humeral prosthetic components correlates with an increase in radiologically measured internal rotation (r = 0.932, P < .001). The uniformity of the reference system used seems to allow accurate positioning of the components intraoperatively and can be useful for analysis of the prosthetic component relationship postoperatively.

Recentering the humeral head for glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty

Substantial posterior glenoid wear causing static posterior subluxation of the humeral head in patients with primary osteoarthritis has been described. Persistent humeral head subluxation after total shoulder arthroplasty can result in early polyethylene wear and glenoid component loosening. In our prospective cohort study, we hypothesized that in patients with posterior glenoid wear from osteoarthritis, static posterior decentering of the humeral head could be recentered during total shoulder arthroplasty by surgical correction of glenoid alignment in the transverse plane with soft tissue balancing. We performed total shoulder arthroplasties in 77 patients with primary osteoarthritis and a mean age of 67.6 years. The mean clinical and radiographic followup was 2 years (range, 1-7 years). Patients with preoperative posteriorly decentered humeral heads did not have posterior decentering develop postoperatively. Twenty patients (83.3%) had centered humeral heads and four patients (16.6%) had anterior decentering. Midterm results of total shoulder arthroplasties in shoulders with humeral head decentering caused by glenoid deficiency in the transverse plane showed correction of the decentering by lowering the high side or by bone grafting with soft tissue balancing can be well maintained.

Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis

BACKGROUND

In osteoarthritis of the shoulder, the tilt of the glenoid surface undergoes an eccentric deformation not only in the anteroposterior but also in the superoinferior direction. The goals of this study were to analyze glenoid version in the coronal plane and to clarify the relationship between retroversion and inferior inclination of the glenoid.

METHODS

Standardized radiographs of 100 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder and 100 otherwise healthy patients with shoulder pain (the control group) were included in this study and were analyzed by two independent observers.

RESULTS

We defined four different types of inclination deformity of the glenoid. In a type-0 glenoid, a line at the base of the coracoid process and a line at the glenoid rim run parallel. Both lines intersect below the inferior glenoid rim in a type-1 glenoid. In a type-2 glenoid, the line at the base of the coracoid process and the glenoid line intersect between the inferior glenoid rim and the center of the glenoid. In a type-3 glenoid, the lines intersect above the base of the coracoid process. A significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the distribution of glenoid types between the two patient groups was observed. Forty-seven patients with osteoarthritis showed combined posterior and inferior glenoid wear. We found no correlation between the type of inclination and the type of glenoid morphology. The interobserver reliability of our observations was very high.

CONCLUSIONS

In osteoarthritis, eccentric inferior glenoid wear is frequent and independent from retroversion deformity of the glenoid. Normalization of glenoid version in both transverse and coronal planes may reduce eccentric loading of the prosthetic glenoid, which has been associated with loosening.

Schulterendoprothetik

Shoulder arthroplasty covers an extensive indication spectrum of degenerative, inflammatory to infectious, tumorous, instability-associated and neurogenic disease to acute trauma and posttraumatic joint destruction. Each of these indications requires its own regime and an appropriate implant. Osteoarthritis is the most frequent indication, and will be used as an example for surgical management, bringing the manufacturer-nonspecific general guidelines, joint mechanics and surgical technology into agreement. The fundamentals of the technique of implantation refer to the anatomical adaptability of the third generation of shoulder prostheses, which permits an accurate reconstruction of glenohumeralen joint centring. This article also describes far-reaching principles, which are generally applicable to all indications for shoulder arthroplasty.