Lack of potentiation of anticonvulsant effect by fluoxetine in drug-resistant epilepsy

Epilepsy Associated Depression: An Update on Current Scenario, Suggested Mechanisms, and Opportunities

Depression is one of the most frequent psychiatric comorbidities associated with epilepsy having a major impact on the patient's quality of life. Several screening tools are available to identify and follow up psychiatric disorders in epilepsy. Out of various psychiatric disorders, people with epilepsy (PWE) are at greater risk of developing depression. This bidirectional relationship further hinders pharmacotherapy of comorbid depression in PWE as some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) worsen associated depression and coadministration of existing antidepressants (ADs) to alleviate comorbid depression has been reported to worsen seizures. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are first choice of ADs and are considered safe in PWE, but there are no high-quality evidences. Similar to observations in people with depression, PWE also showed pharmacoresistant to available SSRI/SNRIs, which further complicates the disease prognosis. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials are necessary to report efficacy and safety of available ADs in PWE. We should also move beyond ADs, and therefore, we reviewed common pathological mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, dysregulated hypothalamus pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, altered neurogenesis, and altered tryptophan metabolism responsible for coexistent relationship of epilepsy and depression. Based on these common pertinent pathways involved in the genesis of epilepsy and depression, we suggested novel targets and therapeutic approaches for safe management of comorbid depression in epilepsy.

The association of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines with ictal central apnea

OBJECTIVE

Ictal (ICA) and postconvulsive central apnea (PCCA) have been implicated in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) pathomechanisms. Previous studies suggest that serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and benzodiazepines (BZDs) may influence breathing. The aim of this study was to investigate if chronic use of these drugs alters central apnea occurrence in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Patients with epilepsy admitted to epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in nine centers participating in a SUDEP study were consented. Polygraphic physiological parameters were analyzed, including video-electroencephalography (VEEG), thoracoabdominal excursions, and pulse oximetry. Outpatient medication details were collected. Patients and seizures were divided into SRI, BZD, and control (no SRI or BZD) groups. Ictal central apnea and PCCA, hypoxemia, and electroclinical features were assessed for each group.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventy-six seizures were analyzed (204 patients). The relative risk (RR) for ICA in the SRI group was half that of the control group (p = 0.02). In the BZD group, ICA duration was significantly shorter than in the control group (p = 0.02), as was postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES) duration (p = 0.021). Both SRI and BZD groups were associated with smaller seizure-associated oxygen desaturation (p = 0.009; p ≪ 0.001). Neither presence nor duration of PCCA was significantly associated with SRI or BZD (p ≫ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures in patients taking SRIs have lower occurrence of ICA, and patients on chronic treatment with BZDs have shorter ICA and PGES durations. Preventing or shortening ICA duration by using SRIs and/or BZD in patients with epilepsy may play a possible role in SUDEP risk reduction.

The effect of fluoxetine on penicillin-induced epileptiform activity

AIM

Depression is the most frequent psychiatric comorbidity in patients with epilepsy. Fluoxetine is the most widely used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in depression. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the dose-dependent effect of fluoxetine on penicillin-induced seizure by electrocorticogram (ECoG), a model for simple partial epilepsy.

METHOD

The epileptiform activity was induced by intracortical (i.c.) microinjection of penicillin into the left sensorimotor cortex. Thirty minutes after penicillin injection, 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg doses of fluoxetine were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.). An ECoG recording was performed for 180 min using the data acquisition system. The frequency and the amplitude of the epileptiform activity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Penicillin induced bilateral spikes and spike-wave complexes within 2-5 min. The 5 and 10 mg/kg doses of fluoxetine significantly reduced the frequency (58%, p < 0.05 and 69%, p < 0.01, 40 and 50 min after fluoxetine injection, respectively) and amplitude (60%, p < 0.01 and 73%, p < 0.05, 40 and 120 min after fluoxetine injection, respectively) of epileptiform activity compared with penicillin-induced seizure group (control). Five-milligram fluoxetine (i.p.) was the most effective dose to decrease frequency and amplitude on penicillin-induced epileptiform activity. However, a higher fluoxetine dose (20 mg/kg) significantly increased frequency (147%, p < 0.01) and amplitude (123%, p < 0.05) of epileptiform activity 40 and 120 min after fluoxetine administration compared with control group. Also, bursts of population spikes were seen in 20 mg/kg fluoxetine doses.

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study indicate that low and moderate fluoxetine doses have an anticonvulsant effect while high doses have proconvulsant effect on penicillin-induced epileptic activity.

Relative Safety of Different Antidepressants for Treatment of Depression in Chronic Epileptic Animals Associated with Depression

Background and Purpose

Depression is one of the major psychiatric comorbidities associated with epilepsy. The inconclusive results of antidepressants (ADs) regarding their safety in regard to convulsions have strongly contributed towards under treatment of depression in people with epilepsy (PWE). Thus, the present study was envisaged to assess the relative safety of four different classes of ADs regarding their convulsive potential in kindled/epileptic animals.

Methods

Kindling (an animal model to induce chronic epilepsy) was induced in male Swiss albino mice by administration of pentylenetetrazole subconvulsive doses (35 mg/kg, i.p.) at an interval of 48 ± 2 h for 42 days. The epileptic animals were treated with saline; imipramine (20 mg/kg/day i.p.); fluoxetine (20 mg/kg/day i.p.); venlafaxine (10 mg/kg/day i.p.) and mirtazapine (10 mg/kg/day i.p.) for 15 days. Except naive, animals were challenged with pentylenetetrazole subconvulsive dose (35 mg/kg, i.p.) on every 5^th day to determine convulsion severity score, latency to first myoclonic jerk, latency to first tonic-clonic convulsions and numbers of tonic-clonic convulsions. Depression was also evaluated every 5^th day employing tail suspension test 2 h after pentylenetetrazole subconvulsive dose.

Results

All ADs have been reported significant antidepressant potential however regarding their safety in regard to convulsions in epileptic animals, variable results are obtained. Chronic administration of venlafaxine and mirtazapine were found to have significant anticonvulsant effect in epileptic animals. The behavioral data was further corroborated by neurochemical findings.

Conclusions

The treatment with venlafaxine and mirtazapine can be considered safe for treatment of depression in epilepsy and may enhance anticonvulsant potential of antiepileptic drugs as an adjuvant therapy. However, pharmacokinetic studies are warranted before translating these findings in PWE.

Managing epilepsy-associated depression: Serotonin enhancers or serotonin producers?

Depression is one of the major psychiatric comorbidities having a major impact on the quality of life in people with epilepsy (PWE). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are considered as safest therapy for the treatment of depression in PWE. Although administration of SSRIs increases the synaptic serotonin levels, it decreases the overall serotonin synthesis in the brain. Long-term therapy with SSRIs has been reported to decrease serotonin synthesis, which may be the possible reason for lessening of their antidepressant effect over time as well as elevated seizure outcomes observed in PWE. Thus the present scenario warrants streamlined studies to explore the safety and efficacy of SSRIs as well as approaches beyond SSRIs for treatment of depression in epilepsy. In this review, we outline the approaches which may restore serotonin levels rather than a pseudo enhancement of serotonin with SSRIs. The potential of various anti-inflammatory approaches such as selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, inflammatory cytokine inhibitors, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors pertaining to their serotonin restoring effects is discussed as possible therapy for treatment of depression in epilepsy.

Antidepressant therapy in epilepsy: can treating the comorbidities affect the underlying disorder?

There is a high incidence of psychiatric comorbidity in people with epilepsy (PWE), particularly depression. The manifold adverse consequences of comorbid depression have been more clearly mapped in recent years. Accordingly, considerable efforts have been made to improve detection and diagnosis, with the result that many PWE are treated with antidepressant drugs, medications with the potential to influence both epilepsy and depression. Exposure to older generations of antidepressants (notably tricyclic antidepressants and bupropion) can increase seizure frequency. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that newer ('second generation') antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, have markedly less effect on excitability and may lead to improvements in epilepsy severity. Although a great deal is known about how antidepressants affect excitability on short time scales in experimental models, little is known about the effects of chronic antidepressant exposure on the underlying processes subsumed under the term 'epileptogenesis': the progressive neurobiological processes by which the non-epileptic brain changes so that it generates spontaneous, recurrent seizures. This paper reviews the literature concerning the influences of antidepressants in PWE and in animal models. The second section describes neurobiological mechanisms implicated in both antidepressant actions and in epileptogenesis, highlighting potential substrates that may mediate any effects of antidepressants on the development and progression of epilepsy. Although much indirect evidence suggests the overall clinical effects of antidepressants on epilepsy itself are beneficial, there are reasons for caution and the need for further research, discussed in the concluding section.

Preclinical antiepileptic actions of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors--implications for clinical trial design

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) can reduce seizure frequency in humans, but no large-scale clinical trials have been done to test the utility of SSRIs as potential antiepileptic drugs. This may be caused in part by a small number of reports on seizures triggered by SSRI treatment. The preclinical literature on SSRIs is somewhat conflicting, which is likely to contribute to the hesitance in accepting SSRIs as possible anticonvulsant drug therapy. A careful review of preclinical studies reveals that SSRIs appear to have region-specific and seizure subtype-specific effects, with models of chronic partial epilepsy being more likely to respond than models of acute generalized seizures. Moreover, this preclinical profile is similar to that of clinical antiepileptic drugs. These observations suggest that SSRIs are promising antiepileptic agents, and that clinical trials may benefit from defining patient groups according to the underlying pathology.

Zimelidine decreases seizure susceptibility in stressed mice

To further evaluate whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have pro- or anticonvulsant properties and whether these properties will be modified by stress, we studied the effect of zimelidine on the convulsions produced by picrotoxin, a GABA(A) receptor antagonist, in unstressed and swim stressed mice. Zimelidine potentiated the ability of swim stress to enhance the threshold doses of intravenously administered picrotoxin producing convulsant signs and death, without having an effect in unstressed mice. The anticonvulsant effect of zimelidine was counteracted with mianserin, the antagonist of 5-HT(2A/2C), and diminished with WAY-100635, a selective antagonist of 5-HT(1A) receptors. In stressed mice, WAY-100635 prevented the anticonvulsant effect of 8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist. SB-269970 and ketanserin, the antagonists of 5-HT(7) and 5-HT(2A) receptors, respectively, failed to reduce the effect of zimelidine. The results suggest the involvement of 5-HT(2C) and 5-HT(1A) receptors in the anticonvulsant effects of zimelidine and possibly other SSRIs in stress.

The serotonergic and noradrenergic effects of antidepressant drugs are anticonvulsant, not proconvulsant

Contrary to existing evidence, convulsant liability of the antidepressants has been attributed to noradrenergic and serotonergic increments. This is a classic case of confusing treatment effects with the manifestations of illness. In fact, the remarkable anticonvulsant effectiveness of antidepressant-induced noradrenergic and serotonergic activation has been ignored. Some antidepressant drugs such as the specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine may be devoid of convulsant liability entirely, while having distinct anticonvulsant properties. Some authorities advance the notion that the seizure predisposition of patients with epilepsy increases risks for antidepressant-induced seizures. However, evidence does not support this contention. Instead, data increasingly support the concept that noradrenergic and serotonergic deficiencies contribute to seizure predisposition. Indeed, the antidepressants have the potential to overcome seizure predisposition in epilepsy. Whereas therapeutic doses of antidepressants elevate noradrenergic and serotonergic transmission, larger doses can activate other biological processes that may be convulsant.

Anticonvulsant effects of acute and repeated fluoxetine treatment in unstressed and stressed mice

Comorbidity of epilepsy and depression is not rare. Stress can affect both depression and seizures. Therefore, it is important to know whether an antidepressant drug has pro- or anticonvulsant properties and whether these properties will be modified by stress. We tested the effects of the antidepressant drug fluoxetine on the seizure threshold for picrotoxin in unstressed and swim-stressed mice. The mice were, prior to exposure to swim stress and the intravenous infusion of picrotoxin (a non-competitive GABA(A) receptor antagonist), pretreated with fluoxetine (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor), either acutely or repeatedly (5 days), and the latency to the onset of two convulsant signs and death was registered. The convulsant signs were running/bouncing clonus and tonic hindlimb extension. As expected, swim stress enhanced the seizure threshold for picrotoxin. Fluoxetine (20 mg/kg ip) given acutely increased in unstressed and swim-stressed mice the dose of picrotoxin producing tonic hindlimb extension and in unstressed mice the dose of picrotoxin producing death. Neither 10 nor 20 mg/kg of fluoxetine affected doses of picrotoxin needed to produce running bouncing/clonus. Repeated treatment with fluoxetine (20 mg/kg ip) enhanced significantly in unstressed and swim-stressed mice doses of picrotoxin needed to produce tonic hindlimb extension and death, and in stressed mice also the dose of picrotoxin producing running/bouncing clonus. The results demonstrate that the antidepressant drug fluoxetine, given acutely or repeatedly, shows anticonvulsant properties against convulsions induced in unstressed and swim-stressed mice by antagonist of GABA(A) receptors, picrotoxin. Swim stress failed to modify the anticonvulsant properties of fluoxetine.

Citalopram as Treatment of Depression in Patients With Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of citalopram as a treatment of depression in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This is an open, multicentered, uncontrolled study. Depressed epileptic patients on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) took part in the study. Patients who had a mild frequency of seizures in the 4 previous months underwent treatment with citalopram (20 mg/d) for 4 consecutive months. A change in seizure frequency from the baseline was chosen as the primary measure for the safety of citalopram and efficacy against depressive symptoms was taken as secondary measure. Depression was rated using the Montgomery-Asberg and Zung depression rating scales. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, and at 2 and 4 months of citalopram therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled. Six patients dropped out of the study early: none of them because of a deterioration of seizure frequency. An overall improvement in seizure frequency was observed in the 39 patients who completed the study. Plasma AED concentrations were unchanged during therapy, and depressive symptoms improved markedly. Twenty-two patients complained of adverse effects, mainly headache, nausea, dizziness, somnolence, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

In this open, multicentered, uncontrolled study, 4 months' of treatment with citalopram (20 mg/d) were associated with an improvement in depressive symptoms and reduction in seizure frequency.

Affective disorder and epilepsy comorbidity: implications for development of treatments, preventions and diagnostic approaches

Concepts pertaining to affective disorder and epilepsy comorbidity are contributing appreciably to improvements in patient care. Several antiepileptic treatments have become important components of the management of bipolar affective disorder. In contrast, little progress has emerged in developing clinical applications of the anticonvulsant properties of the antidepressants in the treatment of the epilepsies. The slow onset of action of the antidepressants remains a major impediment to fully effective treatment of depressive episodes. Nevertheless, studies from experimental epileptology demonstrate that the anticonvulsant effects of the antidepressants occur rapidly and as a consequence of noradrenergic and/or serotonergic activation. These studies also demonstrate that adequate initial doses of the antidepressants are essential to rapid onset of anticonvulsant action. Pharmacokinetically valid loading dose paradigms are seemingly avoided with antidepressant drugs in humans because of potential toxicities and/or patient unacceptability. However, substantial progress has been made in reducing the adverse effect liability of the antidepressants. No longer is convulsive liability considered to stem from the therapeutic mechanisms of the anti-depressants. Rather, noradrenergic and serotonergic influences have demonstrable anticonvulsant properties. Other side effects may also be separable from the anticonvulsant and antidepressive effects of antidepressive treatments. The concept that the protracted process of antidepressant-induced beta-noradrenergic down-regulation is an essential prelude to the onset of mood benefit is no longer a sustainable premise. Nevertheless, increasing evidence underlies the possibility that knowledge of serotonergic and noradrenergic regulatory processes can be used to design strategies that will hasten the onset of antidepressive action. Similar optimism pervades efforts to determine the possibility that dual inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine transporters will hasten onset of antidepressive action. Moreover, because noradrenergic and serotonergic systems are determinants of predisposition to seizures and to dysfunctional affective episodes, augmentation strategies may also be applicable to the use of antidepressant drugs in epilepsy and to the use of antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine in mood disorders. Recent studies have demonstrated that, in part, the therapeutic effectiveness of carbamazepine may stem from its marked capacity to elevate serotonin concentrations in the extracellular fluid of the brain via mechanisms that differ from those of the membrane reuptake inhibitors. Evidence suggests that the epilepsies and affective disorders may arise from a multiplicity of neurobiological abnormalities. A disorder in one individual may arise via different mechanisms than a phenomenologically similar disorder in another individual. Thus, diagnostic tools are needed to make mechanistic distinctions among individuals so that treatments can be appropriately developed and selected. In terms of epileptogenesis and affective disorder progression, neuroprotective paradigms for one individual may differ from those needed for another. Moreover, diagnostic technologies that are adequate to detect genetically and/or experientially determined vulnerability before the onset of a seizure or dysfunctional affective episode may be valuable steps toward achieving goals of prevention.

Does Serotonin Play a Role in Epilepsy?

Studies in experimental models have suggested a potential role for serotonergic transmission in epilepsy, and interest in this research has been increased by the development of positron emission tomography (PET) ligands that can be used to study 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors and transporters. The serotonergic system is very complex. At least 13 distinct G protein-coupled 5-HT receptors and one ligand-gated ion channel receptor (5-HT(3)) are divided into seven distinct classes (5-HT(1) to 5-HT(7)) ((1)). The receptors vary widely in their distribution and effects, innervating vascular structures and gut smooth muscle as well as neuronal tissue. Several receptor subtypes may be relevant to epilepsy.

Effects of fluoxetine and TFMPP on spontaneous seizures in rats with pilocarpine-induced epilepsy

PURPOSE

Fluoxetine is a selective serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) commonly used to treat depression. Some uncontrolled clinical studies have reported that SSRIs increase seizures, but animal experiments with evoked-seizure models have suggested that SSRIs at therapeutic doses decrease seizure susceptibility. We tested the hypothesis that fluoxetine and trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP, a nonselective 5-HT-receptor agonist) reduce the frequency of spontaneous motor seizures in pilocarpine-treated rats.

METHODS

Fluoxetine (20 mg/kg) and TFMPP (5 mg/kg) were administered to rats with pilocarpine-induced epilepsy. Phenobarbital (PB; 10 mg/kg) was a positive control, and saline (i.e., 0.5 ml) controlled for the injection protocol. Each rat received each treatment (intraperitoneally) once per day for 5 consecutive days with 1 week between treatments. Rats were continuously video-monitored for the last 72 h of each treatment.

RESULTS

When compared with saline over the entire 72-h observation period, PB and fluoxetine treatment, but not TFMPP, reduced the spontaneous-seizure rate. Plots of magnitude of the drug effect as a function of seizure frequency after saline treatment revealed larger drug effects for fluoxetine and PB in the rats with the highest control seizure rate. When the data from the five rats with the highest seizure frequency in saline were analyzed for the first 6 h after treatment, TFMPP also significantly reduced seizure frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Animal models with spontaneous seizures can be used to screen potential antiepileptic drugs, and fluoxetine and TFMPP reduce spontaneous seizures in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy.

Atypical antipsychotics and serotoninergic antidepressants in patients with epilepsy: pharmacodynamic considerations

PURPOSE

To discuss the pharmacodynamic aspects of the administration of atypical antipsychotics (APs) and serotoninergic antidepressants (SSRIs) to patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This article represents an overview of all studies concerning the administration of APs and SSRIs to people with epilepsy. In particular, it deals with the relationship between neuroleptics (NLTs), APs, SSRIs, serotonin, and dopamine, with special focus on the possible epileptogenic role of psychoactive drugs.

RESULTS

NLTs may induce seizures by blocking D2, H1, and.1 receptors, or by sexual hormone activation or a pharmacologic kindling mechanism. The difference among APs in their ability to induce seizures is related mainly to the percentage of D2-receptor occupancy and possibly also to their action on neurosteroids. Seizures occur at SSRIs therapeutic doses, with a 0.1-4% incidence. Coversely, in animal studies fluoxetine was claimed to exert an anticonvulsant action.

CONCLUSIONS

The study of the pharmacodynamic aspects of the administration of APs and SSRIs to patients with epilepsy can help to evaluate the importance of some mechanisms of action of several psychoactive drugs in relation to their pro- or anticonvulsant activity.

Childhood epilepsy in relation to mental handicap and behavioural disorders

Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a high rate of mental retardation and behavioural problems in children with epilepsy. In some cases both the epilepsy and the mental retardation will have a common cause, such as a metabolic disorder or brain trauma. However, in other children, the epilepsy itself may cause either temporary or permanent learning problems. When permanent learning disability can be prevented it is important to treat the epilepsy early and effectively. Children with specific learning difficulties and memory problems can benefit greatly from appropriate management. There are many causes of behavioural disturbance in children with epilepsy. These causes include the epilepsy itself, treatment of the epilepsy, reactions to the epilepsy, associated brain damage/dysfunction and causes that are equally applicable to children who do not have epilepsy. Identifying the cause or causes in each child allows rational management to be provided. Antiepileptic treatment with medication or surgery can either improve the situation or make matters worse. The treatment should be tailored to the needs of the individual child. If surgery is required, there is a strong argument for performing this early in life, both to allow the greatest opportunity for brain plasticity and also to allow the child full benefit from the important developmental and educational years, without the problems that can be associated with the epilepsy. Skilled management of children with epilepsy who have mental retardation and/or behavioural problems can be very rewarding both for the family and for the professionals involved.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus: the role of morphine and its antagonist

A 77-year-old woman with no history of epilepsy presented a probable nonconvulsive status epilepticus while receiving continuous intravenous morphine for back pain relating to vertebral metastasis of a malignant lymphoma. A generalized tonic-clonic seizure occurred a few minutes after injection of the morphine antagonist naloxone. No cerebral lesion was detected. This observation supports the notion of a possible pro-epileptogenic effect of opioid substances in association with metabolic and other toxic factors. Various hypotheses as to the complex actions of morphine and its antagonist in epileptogenesis are discussed.

Depression in epilepsy: etiology, phenomenology, and treatment

A history of depression or depressive symptomatology has been reported in up to two-thirds of patients with medically intractable epilepsy, whereas community studies have demonstrated affective disorder only in a quarter of these patients. Depression has been reported peri- and interictally. However, differentiation may be difficult in patients with frequent seizures. Most authors have found no correlation between depression and epilepsy variables. However, complex partial seizures, especially of temporal lobe origin, appear to be etiologic factors, particularly in men with left-sided foci. Depression is also more common in patients treated with polytherapy especially with barbiturates, phenytoin, and vigabatrin. Depression has also been described de novo after temporal lobectomy. Psychosocial factors also play a part, but underlying risk factors (e.g., genetic, endocrine and metabolic) may explain the increased rates of depression in people with epilepsy compared to those with other neurologic and chronic medical conditions. The depression appears to be endogenous. Patients tend to exhibit fewer neurotic traits and more psychotic symptoms such as paranoia, delusions, and persecutory auditory hallucinations. Treatment approaches include psychotherapy, rationalization of antiepileptic drug medication, antidepressant treatment, and ECT. The tricyclic and related antidepressants appear to be epileptogenic, especially in people at high risk (personal or family history of seizures, abnormal pretreatment EEG, brain damage, alcohol or substance abuse/withdrawal and concurrent use of CNS-active medication). Seizures tend to occur early in treatment or after dose increments, especially if rapidly titrated. There is little evidence that the newer antidepressants, e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, moclobemide, venlafaxine, or nefazodone are more epileptogenic than placebo.

Behavioral, psychotic, and anxiety disorders in epilepsy: etiology, clinical features, and therapeutic implications

This chapter deals with some aspects of psychiatric disturbances in people with epilepsy. Because depression and its treatment are extensively described later in this issue, they are not discussed here. The same pertains to forced normalization.

Interactions between anticonvulsant and psychoactive drugs

This review considers the relevance of pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and psychoactive drugs in the treatment of mood disorders in patients with epilepsy. The determination of plasma levels of some of these drugs (mainly the AEDs) has enabled clinicians to evaluate the kinetic modifications during the course of such combined therapies and to adjusting the dosages in cases of subtherapeutic or toxic levels. In general, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine stimulate the catabolic degradation of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and TCAs have an inhibitory effect on the elimination of AEDs. The newer antidepressants that selectively inhibit the reuptake of serotonin (SSRIs), although in different fashions for the different substances (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine) may cause an increase of plasma AED levels through inhibition of the isoenzyme P450 2D6. Similarly, antipsychotics (APs) are more rapidly metabolized when AEDs are co-administered, whereas AED metabolism is scarcely influenced by AP. Finally, plasma levels of tranquilizers are lowered by AED co-therapy. As the concomitant administration of AED and psychoactive drugs becomes increasingly used for treatment of mood disorders in patients with or without epilepsy, therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful in designing correct and rational therapy.

Antidepressants and seizures: clinical anecdotes overshadow neuroscience

Pharmacological treatment of depression in persons with epilepsy has been an area of controversy because some drugs commonly are perceived specifically to induce or exacerbate seizures in patients with seizure disorders. This prevailing misconception is unjustified by scientific studies, yet it continues to prevent afflicted persons from receiving appropriate therapy. The scientific literature shows that tricyclic antidepressant drugs cause seizures in overdose in both animals and humans. In lower doses, these drugs have anticonvulsant activity in humans and animals. Thus, the antidepressant drugs are like several antiepileptic drugs that can both prevent and cause seizures. The anticonvulsant activity of antidepressant drugs has been studied extensively in animals and almost certainly stems from their capacity to block norepinephrine and/or serotonin reuptake. The pharmacodynamic action responsible for their convulsant effects has not been well studied but may be due to their local anesthetic, antihistaminic, or antimuscarinic activity. The newer, more selective monoamine uptake blockers have very low convulsant liability, and it is suggested that their anticonvulsant activity, which is well documented in animals, be investigated further in humans. If their effects in humans are analogous to those in animals, these drugs can be used safely in epileptic patients with depression, and it is possible that their anticonvulsant activity can be exploited for use in the treatment of epilepsy.