Flap choice in head and neck reconstruction

Trends in free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: a single surgeon series of 1027 free tissue transfers

BACKGROUND

Free tissue transfer has fundamentally changed head and neck surgery, enabling reliable reconstruction of large defects with better function and aesthetics. This study assesses two decades of trends in free flap reconstruction, and how disease incidence, survival, surgeon caseload, team approach, and technology have impacted practice.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 1027 head and neck free flaps from 2006 to 2022. Outcomes examined include chronological changes in flap selection, indication, length of stay, incorporation of virtual surgical planning (VSP), annual caseload, survival, and their associations with the single versus multi-team approach.

RESULTS

There were 764 soft-tissue and 263 osseous reconstructions utilizing 21 different flaps. Anterolateral thigh and radial forearm accounted for 76.7% of soft tissue flaps, with recent increase in superficial circumflex iliac perforator flaps in young patients. Osseous flap proportion remained stable, but fibula flaps increased five-fold with more VSP, dental implants, oral cancer, and multi-team surgery. Outcomes such as complication rates, length of stay and disease specific/overall survival have improved over time despite increasing complexity (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in operative time, complication rate, or disease specific/overall survival between single team or multi-team approaches (P = 0.45, P = 0.054, P = 0.57, and P = 0.60, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Single and multi-team approaches may have similar fundamental outcomes, but as caseload, complexity, and life-expectancy increases, both patients and surgeons benefit from a collaborative multi-team approach that focuses on improving long-term functional outcomes.

Multiple simultaneous free flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A multi-institutional cohort

OBJECTIVES

To describe the experience of two tertiary academic centers with multiple, simultaneous free flaps for complex head and neck defect reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients undergoing multiple, simultaneous free flaps from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (64.8% male, median age 61 years) were identified and underwent 143 free flaps. The leading surgical indication was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 48, 67.6%). Defect sites included oral cavity, maxilla, pharynx, parotid, skull base, and scalp. The most common free flap combinations were fibula (FFF) with anterolateral thigh flap (n = 33, 46.5%), radial forearm (RFFF) with scapula (n = 11, 15.5%), and RFFF with FFF (n = 10, 14.1%). Median operative time was 12 h. Median length of hospitalization was 10 days. At last follow-up (median 6 months), 141 flaps (98.6%) survived without partial nor complete flap failure.

CONCLUSION

Multiple, simultaneous free flaps are a rare, yet reliable option for head and neck reconstruction in select patients with defects involving several tissue types, multiple functional areas, or large volumes.

Comparison of radiotherapy strategies for locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer after resection and ileocolic flap reconstruction

CONCLUSION

IMRT provided better conformity, less toxicity and better function restoration for advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma after major surgery with ileocolic flap reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the results of adjuvant conventional radiotherapy (2DRT) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer after resection and ileocolic free flap reconstruction and to design treatment plans for those two modalities plus 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for dose distribution comparison.

METHODS

13 locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer patients were enrolled, 8 treated with 2DRT and 5 with IMRT. Different plans were planned for 3 IMRT-treated patients for comparing dose distribution.

RESULTS

After major surgery, patients treated with IMRT had less toxicity and better functional restoration than those with 2DRT. IMRT and 3DCRT both showed lower dose to the spinal cord than did 2DRT. Only IMRT showed reduced dose to ileocolic flap.