MR IMAGING OF THE LIVER USING GADOLINIUM CHELATES

Cholangiocarcinoma imaging: from diagnosis to response assessment

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly aggressive primary liver cancer arising from the bile duct epithelium, represents a substantial proportion of hepatobiliary malignancies, posing formidable challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Notably, the global incidence of intrahepatic CCA has seen a rise, necessitating a critical examination of diagnostic and management strategies, especially due to presence of close imaging mimics such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). Hence, it is imperative to understand the role of various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), elucidating their strengths, and limitations in diagnostic precision and staging accuracy. Beyond conventional approaches, there is emerging significance of functional imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI, providing pivotal insights into diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and prognostic evaluation. This comprehensive review explores the risk factors, classification, clinical features, and role of imaging in the holistic spectrum of diagnosis, staging, management, and restaging for CCA, hence serving as a valuable resource for radiologists evaluating CCA.

Updates in Diagnosis and Endoscopic Management of Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an adenocarcinoma originating from the epithelial cells of the bile ducts/hepatocytes or peribiliary glands. There are three types of cholangiocarcinoma: intrahepatic, perihilar and distal. CCA represents approximately 3% of the gastrointestinal malignancies. The incidence of CCA is higher in regions of the Eastern world compared to the Western countries. There are multiple risk factors associated with cholangiocarcinoma such as liver fluke, primary sclerosing cholangitis, chronic hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Endoscopy plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma. The main endoscopic methods used for diagnosis, biliary drainage and delivering intrabiliary local therapies are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound. The purpose of this review is to analyze the current data found in literature about cholangiocarcinoma, with a focus on the actual diagnostic tools and endoscopic management options.

MRI and (1)H MRS findings of hepatobilary changes and cholangiocarcinoma development in hamsters infected with Opisthorchis viverrini and treated with N-nitrosodimethylamine

3 T MRI and (1)H MRS were useful for quantitative investigation of the serial development of hepatobiliary changes in Opisthorchis viverrini infection in hamsters, and the differential diagnosis of cholangiocacinoma (CCA) development from bile duct changes and normal condition is unclear. In this study, we investigated the serial development of hepatobiliary changes and CCAgenesis in O. viverrini-infected and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) treated hamsters (ON group) using 3 T MRI and (1)H MRS and the results were compared with those either in the O. viverrini-infected group (OV group) and uninfected normal controls. In the ON group, CCAs were first found at 9 weeks post-infection, with sizes of ~2 mm. The typical MR signal characteristics of CCA were hypo- and occasionally isointensity signal on T1-weighted images, and mild-moderate to hyper-intensity signal on T2-weighted images compared to the liver parenchyma. T2-weighted images with fat suppression revealed dilatation of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, and often defined the anatomical level of biliary obstruction, cystic lesions, liver abscesses, and CCA which was starting seen of these noticeable abnormalities at 5 weeks onwards. The results of fibrosis grading using MR images showed a positive correlation (r=0.90, P<0.038 by Spearman's rank correlation test) with those of the histopathological grading. In addition, 3.0 T (1)H MRS showed elevated choline and decreased lipids levels in the liver tissues of the ON group. In conclusion, MRI and (1)H MRS are useful for the quantitative investigation of the serial development of hepatobilary changes and CCA in hamsters, and are potentially useful as early diagnostic tools for CCA.

Nanosystems: the use of nanoalloys, metallic, bimetallic, and magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications

There is a growing interest in the use of nanosystems such as nanoalloys, bimetallic nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles and magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications. These applications can be as diverse as hyperthermic treatments; targeted drug delivery; bio-imaging; cell labelling and gene delivery. The use of nanoalloys in these applications has received only limited attention due to the fact that there were many unanswered questions and concerns regarding nanoparticles and nanoalloys such as their stability over time, tendency to agglomerate, chemical activity, ease of oxidation, biocompatibility and cytotoxicity. In this chapter we survey current applications and advances in magnetic nanoparticles used in these biomedical applications so as to understand the materials properties that can pave the way for the use of nanoalloys as a potential alternative or improve solutions that are offered by current materials.

[Radiological diagnosis of primary hepatic malignancy]

Modern radiology offers countless opportunities both in the detection but also in the characterization of primary liver malignancies. Ultrasound remains usually the first exploratory overview study whereat using ultrasound contrast agent for a further characterization of liver lesions improves this technique considerably. Advanced cross-sectional imaging methods can, in most cases, already provide an exact diagnosis. Thus, the CT is already considered a standard technique for liver imaging and magnetic resonance imaging has gained in recent years due to liver-specific contrast agents and faster sequences a central role in liver imaging. The following article provides an overview of these various radiological procedures and describes the different primary liver malignancies and their imaging characteristics.

Magnetic resonance imaging of liver malignancies

The histological structure of the liver is complex, consisting of hepatocytes, biliary epithelium, and mesenchymal cells. From this large variety of cells, a broad spectrum of benign and malignant liver lesions in originate. An accurate diagnosis of these lesions is mandatory for choosing an appropriate therapeutic approach. With the recent developments in hardware and software, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the method of choice in the diagnostic workup of focal liver lesions, in particular in the pretherapeutic stage. The introduction of high-field MRI at 3.0 T in the routine workup and the selective use of liver-specific contrast agents, including hepatobiliary and reticuloendothelial agents, have also strengthened the role of MRI in liver imaging. In this overview article, we will review the recent developments in 3.0-T MRI and MRI contrast agents in the diagnostic workup of the most common malignant liver tumors.

3D excretory MR urography: Improved image quality with intravenous saline and diuretic administration

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of diuretic administration on the image quality of excretory magnetic resonance urography (MRU) obtained following intravenous hydration, and to determine whether intravenous hydration alone is sufficient to produce diagnostic quality studies of nondilated upper tracts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with nondilated upper tracts were evaluated with contrast-enhanced MRU. All patients received 250 mL of saline intravenously immediately prior to the examination. A total of 11 patients received 10-20 mg furosemide in addition to saline. Imaging was performed with a three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) breathhold spoiled gradient-echo sequences. Excretory MRU images were acquired five minutes after the administration of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium and were independently reviewed by two radiologists, who were blinded to the MRU technique. Readers evaluated the calyces, renal pelvis, and ureters qualitatively for degree of opacification, distention, and artifacts on a four-point scale. Statistical analysis was performed using a permutation test.

RESULTS

There was no significant disagreement between the two readers (P=0.14). Furosemide resulted in significant improvement in calyceal and renal pelvis distention (P<0.005), and significant artifact reduction in all upper tract segments (P<0.001) compared to the effect of saline alone.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous furosemide significantly improves the image quality of excretory MRU studies obtained following intravenous hydration. Intravenous saline alone is insufficient to produce diagnostic quality studies of the non-dilated upper tracts.

MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how

The major classes of contrast agents currently used for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the liver include extracellular agents (eg, low-molecular-weight gadolinium chelates), reticuloendothelial agents (eg, ferumoxides), hepatobiliary agents (eg, mangafodipir), blood pool agents, and combined agents. Mechanisms of action, dosage, elimination, toxic effects, indications for use, and MR imaging technical considerations vary according to class. Gadolinium chelates are the most widely used. Ferumoxides are a useful adjunct for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly when used in combination with gadolinium to achieve improved lesion-to-liver contrast over that achievable with gadolinium alone. Mangafodipir is a prototype hepatobiliary agent that is taken up by lesions with functioning hepatocytes. It may be used for MR cholangiography as well as liver imaging. Although mangafodipir is no longer commercially available in the United States, it is currently marketed and used in Europe. Blood pool agents have not yet been approved for human use in the United States. However, a new combined MR contrast agent, gadobenate dimeglumine, recently was approved, and other agents are in various stages of development.

Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI for the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: Is delayed imaging useful?

PURPOSE

To investigate the usefulness of early and delayed hepatic MRI after mangafodipir trisodium (Mn-DPDP) administration for the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients (31 males and 14 females, mean age = 61 years) with a total of 113 hepatic lesions (mean size = 3.5 cm) were included in this study (15 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, N = 35), 20 with hepatic metastasis (N = 63), five with hemangioma (N = 10), three with cholangiocarcinoma (CC, N = 3), and two with liver abscess (N = 2)). T1-weighted gradient-echo MR images were obtained before and after Mn-DPDP administration, with a mean 18-hour delayed imaging. A qualitative analysis (including the size and signal intensity (SI)) and quantitative analysis (including enhancement and lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) were performed on pre- and postcontrast early and delayed MR images.

RESULTS

Compared to postcontrast early imaging, 17 (48.6%) of 35 HCCs showed higher SI, 16 (45.7%) showed no SI change, and two (5.7%) showed lower SI on delayed imaging. All 63 metastases, 10 hemangiomas, three CCs, and two abscesses showed no SI change. On delayed imaging, ring enhancement was noted in 53 metastases (84.1%), three hemangiomas (30.0%), and one abscess (50.0%), but was not seen in HCCs or CCs. Eight metastases (12.7%) also showed ring enhancement on postcontrast early imaging. No newly detected hepatic lesions were revealed on postcontrast delayed MR images compared to postcontrast early images. Regarding CNR, the HCCs showed a significant increase in CNR from postcontrast early to delayed images after administration of Mn-DPDP (P < 0.01). However, none of the metastases, hemangiomas, CCs, and abscesses showed a significant increase of CNR from postcontrast early to delayed images.

CONCLUSION

Postcontrast delayed MR images after Mn-DPDP administration were helpful in distinguishing hepatocellular from nonhepatocellular lesions, but were not useful for lesion detection and had limited utility for lesion characterization, since benign and malignant hepatic lesions looked the same.

Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced dynamic MRI and 16-MDCT for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI with that of 16-MDCT for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with 53 hepatocellular carcinomas underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced dynamic MRI and multiphasic CT using 16-MDCT within a mean interval of 5 days (range, 3-9 days). The dynamic MRI examination was performed using 3D fat-saturated volumetric interpolated imaging and sensitivity encoding on a 1.5-T unit. Both dynamic MRI and multiphasic MDCT included dual arterial phase images. Three observers independently interpreted the CT and MR images in random order, separately, and without patient identifiers. The diagnostic accuracy of each technique was evaluated using the alternative-free response ROC method. The sensitivity and positive predictive values were also calculated.

RESULTS

The sensitivities of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for all observers were significantly higher than those of MDCT for all the lesions and for lesions 1.0 cm or smaller (p < 0.05); however, for lesions larger than 1.0 cm, the sensitivities of the two imaging techniques were similar. The mean area under the ROC curve (A(z)) of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (0.87 +/- 0.03 [SD]) was higher than that of MDCT (0.83 +/- 0.04), but no significant difference was found between them (p = 0.31). The number of false-positive findings on dynamic MRI was slightly higher than on MDCT, but no significant difference in the positive predictive value between the two imaging techniques was detected (observer 1, p = 0.06; observer 2, p = 0.13; observer 3, p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI has a higher sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinomas (</= 1 cm) but a higher false-positive rate due to nonspecific enhancement of benign lesions, such as arterioportal shunt, leading to no significant difference of overall accuracy when compared with MDCT.

L’IRM fonctionnelle pour l’étude de la fonction placentaire

Placental insufficiency, a process due to either poor placental perfusion or permeability, may lead to progressive deterioration in placental function and materno-fetal morbidity. Advances in MR contrast media pharmacokinetic studies of transit through tissues and dynamic MRI allow to characterize organs microcirculation in vivo. Placental function assessment might be achieved using analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of tracers. A murine model of placental assessment has been constructed. Herein, principles, results and limitations of such techniques are discussed as well as their potential interest and weaknesses in humans.

Characterization of Hepatocellular Tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the value of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging for characterization of hepatocellular lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of 41 patients with 48 histopathologically proven hepatocellular lesions (20 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], 4 adenomas, 15 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 7 regenerative nodules, and 2 others) were retrospectively studied. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on a 1.5-T unit (Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; ACS-NT, Philips, Best, The Netherlands) using T2-weighted, fat-saturation, turbo spin echo imaging and T1-weighted gradient echo imaging before and 20 minutes after infusion of 5 micromol/kg mangafodipir (Amersham Health, Oslo, Norway). Qualitative analysis by 4 blinded independent readers included assessment of unenhanced images and, in a second step, assessment of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images together. Lesions were classified as benign or malignant using a 5-point scale, and readers made a specific diagnosis.

RESULTS

For characterization of hepatocellular lesions, mangafodipir-enhanced imaging was significantly superior to unenhanced imaging (P < 0.05). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.768 (95% confidence interval: 0.633-0.903) for unenhanced images and 0.866 (95% confidence interval: 0.767-0.966) for evaluation of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images together (P < 0.05). Analysis of enhancement patterns aided in characterization and classification of tumors.

CONCLUSION

Administration of mangafodipir improves the differentiation between adenoma or HCC and "nonsurgical" lesions (FNH or regenerative nodules). The accuracy for arriving at a specific diagnosis is higher when unenhanced and mangafodipir-enhanced images are considered together than for unenhanced MR images alone.

MRT der Leber

The liver is a common site for various benign and malignant focal lesions. The initial modality for assessing liver lesions is ultrasound or CT. MRI with its superior soft tissue contrast offers multiple advantages over other imaging modalities. Contrast agents have been developed that increase the detection rate and provide more specific information in comparison to unenhanced techniques. In the mean time three classes are available for MR imaging of the liver: extracellular gadolinium chelates, hepatobiliary and reticulo-endothelia, superparamagnetic agents. We describe in this review the most common focal lesions, their diagnostic possibilities, and the imaging protocols. Clinical use of these contrast agents facilitates detection and differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions that may help to avoid invasive procedures such as biopsy for lesion characterization.

Modern hepatic imaging

This article provides a brief overview of the current status of commonly employed diagnostic techniques--US, CT, MR, and PET--for the evaluation of liver metastases and HCC as well as a description of imaging in RF ablation and liver transplantation. The various advantages and limitations of the techniques have been outlined. At the present time, at our center, MRI is used most often to evaluate these liver pathologies, due to its high accuracy for lesion detection and characterization.