Head-to-head comparison of exercise stress testing, pharmacologic stress echocardiography, and perfusion tomography as first-line examination for chest pain in patients without history of coronary artery disease

Addition of the duration of ST segment depression to Duke treadmill score for diagnostic accuracy of exercise electrocardiography to predict obstructive coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Exercise electrocardiography (EET) is a safe and cost-effective method to predict the presence, prognosis, and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Various score models have been developed to increase predictive power of EET. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether adding ST depression duration could have an effect on increasing the value of Duke treadmill score (DTS) in predicting obstructive CAD.

METHODS

In this single centred, cross-sectional study, we evaluated a total of 258 patients who presented with a complaint of chest pain and undergone coronary angiogram in result of a positive EET. DTS was calculated for all the patients. The new score-revised DTS- was calculated by adding total ST depression time to classical DS parameters. We compared area under the curve (AUC) of DTS and revised DTS by Delongi method.

RESULTS

Mean age of the group was 58.43 ± 9.37, and 37.2% (n = 96) were female. Mean total ST-depression duration was 171.72 ± 91.43 msec in normal artery group,241.54 ± 118.11 msec in non-obstructive CAD group, and 281.26 ± 113.64 in obstructive CAD group.ST-depression duration in both exercise and recovery, and total ST depression duration were significantly higher in obstructive CAD group than non-obstructive and normal artery groups (p = 0.024, p = 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). Revised DTS had significantly higher predictive value of obstructive CAD compared to classical DS (AUC (95%CI): 0.744 vs. 0.626, p < 0.001). The AUC of DS was significantly lower than the new score (z-score:3.274, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, adding ST depression duration to DTS calculation is increasing the discriminative value of DTS to predict obstructive CAD. Benefits of EET within the context of the management of CAD is well-known, hence, it is clear that physicians may use revised DTS.

Diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Exercise stress testing offers a non-invasive, less expensive way of risk stratification prior to coronary angiography, and a negative stress test may actually avoid angiography. However, previous meta-analyses have not included all exercise test modalities, or patients without known Coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing for CAD on angiography. MEDLINE (January 1966 to November 2009), MEDION (1966 to July 2009), CENTRAL (1966 to July 2009) and EMBASE (1980-2009) databases were searched for English language articles on diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing. We included prospective studies comparing exercise stress testing with a reference standard of coronary angiography in patients without known CAD. From 6,055 records, we included 34 studies with 3,352 participants. Overall, we found published studies regarding five different exercise testing modalities: treadmill ECG, treadmill echo, bicycle ECG, bicycle echo and myocardial perfusion imaging. The prevalence of CAD ranged from 12% to 83%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios of stress testing increased in low prevalence settings. Treadmill echo testing (LR+ = 7.94) performed better than treadmill ECG testing (LR+ = 3.57) for ruling in CAD and ruling out CAD (echo LR- = 0.19 vs. ECG LR- = 0.38). Bicycle echo testing (LR+ = 11.34) performed better than treadmill echo testing (LR+ = 7.94), which outperformed both treadmill ECG and bicycle ECG. A positive exercise test is more helpful in younger patients (LR+ = 4.74) than in older patients (LR+ = 2.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of exercise testing varies, depending upon the age, gender and clinical characteristics of the patient, prevalence of CAD and modality of test used. Exercise testing, whether by echocardiography or ECG, is more useful at excluding CAD than confirming it. Clinicians have concentrated on individualising the treatment of CAD, but there is great scope for individualising the diagnosis of CAD using exercise testing.

Acute coronary syndromes: Diagnosis and management, part II

At the most severe end of the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes is ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which usually occurs when a fibrin-rich thrombus completely occludes an epicardial coronary artery. The diagnosis of STEMI is based on clinical characteristics and persistent ST-segment elevation as demonstrated by 12-lead electrocardiography. Patients with STEMI should undergo rapid assessment for reperfusion therapy, and a reperfusion strategy should be implemented promptly after the patient's contact with the health care system. Two methods are currently available for establishing timely coronary reperfusion: primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolytic therapy. Percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred method but is not always available. Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants are critical adjuncts to reperfusion. This article summarizes the current evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of STEMI. This summary is followed by a brief discussion of the role of noninvasive stress testing in the assessment of patients with acute coronary syndrome and their selection for coronary revascularization.

Methodological Analysis of Diagnostic Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Studies

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an accepted test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), despite its wide diagnostic accuracy.

AIM

Which factors cause test variability of DSE for the diagnosis of CAD.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of 46 studies in 5,353 patients, the potential causes of diagnostic variability were systematically analyzed, including patient selection, definition of CAD, chest pain characteristics, confounding factors for DSE (left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, female gender), work-up bias (present when patient's chance to undergo coronary angiography is influenced by the result of DSE), review bias (present when DSE is interpreted in relation to CAG), DSE protocol and definition of a positive DSE.

RESULTS

Diagnostic variability was related to definition of a positive test, but not related to the definition of CAD or DSE protocol. However, only three of eight methodological standards for research design found general compliance. Differences in the selection of the study population (quality of echocardiographic window, angina pectoris), handling of confounding factors and analysis of disease in individual coronary arteries were observed. Lack of data on analysis of relevant chest pain syndromes and handling of nondiagnostic test results hampered further evaluation of these standards.

CONCLUSION

Methodological problems may explain the wide range in diagnostic variability of DSE. An improvement of clinical relevance of DSE testing is possible by stronger adherence to common and new methodological standards.

Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic testing: dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Clinical characteristics of patients, angiographic referral bias, and several technical factors may all affect the reported diagnostic accuracy of tests. The aim of this study was to assess their influence on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

METHODS

The medical literature from 1991 to 2006 was searched for diagnostic studies using DSE and meta-analysis was applied to the 62 studies thus retrieved, including 6881 patients. These studies were analyzed for patient characteristics, angiographic referral bias, and several technical factors.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of DSE was significantly related to the inclusion of patients with prior myocardial infarctions (0.834 vs 0.740, P < .01) and defining the results of DSE as already positive in case of resting wall motion abnormalities rather than obligatory myocardial ischemia (0.786 vs 0.864, P < .01). Specificity tended to be lower when patients with resting wall motion abnormalities were included in a study (0.812 vs 0.877, P < .10). The presence of referral bias adversely affected the specificity of DSE (0.771 vs 0.842, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that the reported sensitivity of DSE is likely higher and the specificity lower than expected in routine clinical practice because of the inappropriate inclusion of patients with prior myocardial infarctions, the definition of positive results on DSE, and the negative influence of referral bias. However, in the patient subset that will be sent to coronary angiography, the opposite results can be expected.

Diagnostic efficacy of a low-dose 32-projection SPECT 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging protocol in routine practice

BACKGROUND

99mTc-labeled tracers can provide better imaging quality than does TI for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Nevertheless, a large study showed no significant difference in diagnostic efficacy, implying that image quality, though not optimal, may be still adequate for reliable interpretation. We thus proposed a suboptimal low-dose 32-projection single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) 99mTc-sestamibi (99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile) MPI protocol and evaluated its diagnostic efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 1007 patients undergoing the proposed rest-stress MPI protocol were included in the study for analysis. Among them, 218 had coronary angiography, which was used as the 'gold standard' for evaluating sensitivity and specificity. The normalcy rate was obtained from 47 patients with a low cardiovascular risk. The injected dosage for 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile resting and dipyridamole stress imaging is 185 and 555 MBq, respectively, with an interval of about 2 h between the two injections. Most of the patients completed the whole MPI within 3 h.

RESULTS

Using this protocol, the sensitivity and specificity of the 218 patients with subsequent coronary angiography for determining coronary artery disease were 95 and 63%, respectively. The normalcy rate was 87%. Both the rest and stress images were adequate for confident interpretation.

CONCLUSION

The proposed low-dose 32-projection SPECT protocol has a diagnostic efficacy comparable with that reported in the literature, most of which used a higher dose and 64-projection SPECT, with additional benefits of lower radiation exposure, lower cost, and shorter study time.

The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines state that "dobutamine stress echo has substantially higher sensitivity than vasodilator stress echo for detection of coronary artery stenosis" while the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and the European Association of Echocardiography recommendations conclude that "the two tests have very similar applications". Who is right?

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine versus dipyridamole stress echocardiography through an evidence-based approach.

METHODS

From PubMed search, we identified all papers with coronary angiographic verification and head-to-head comparison of dobutamine stress echo (40 mcg/kg/min +/- atropine) versus dipyridamole stress echo performed with state-of-the art protocols (either 0.84 mg/kg in 10' plus atropine, or 0.84 mg/kg in 6' without atropine). A total of 5 papers have been found. Pooled weight meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

the 5 analyzed papers recruited 435 patients, 299 with and 136 without angiographically assessed coronary artery disease (quantitatively assessed stenosis > 50%). Dipyridamole and dobutamine showed similar accuracy (87%, 95% confidence intervals, CI, 83-90, vs. 84%, CI, 80-88, p = 0.48), sensitivity (85%, CI 80-89, vs. 86%, CI 78-91, p = 0.81) and specificity (89%, CI 82-94 vs. 86%, CI 75-89, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

When state-of-the art protocols are considered, dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echo have similar accuracy, specificity and - most importantly - sensitivity for detection of CAD. European recommendations concluding that "dobutamine and vasodilators (at appropriately high doses) are equally potent ischemic stressors for inducing wall motion abnormalities in presence of a critical coronary artery stenosis" are evidence-based.

A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors

BACKGROUND

The relative performance of alternative stressors for stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established.

METHODS

All studies published between 1981 to December 2001 who met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. We performed a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) analysis and calculated weighted mean of the likelihood ratio and sensitivity/specificity. A covariate analysis using meta-regression methods was also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies presented data on Exercise, 11 on Adenosine, 80 on Dobutamine, 40 on Dipyridamole, 16 on transatrial pacing transesophageal echocardiography (Tap-TEE), and 7 on transatrial pacing transthorasic echocardiography (Tap-TTE). SROC analysis showed that the following order of most discriminatory to least: Tap-TEE, Exercise, Dipyridamole, Dobutamine and Adenosine. Weighted means sensitivity/specificity were Exercise: 82.6/84.4%, Adenosine: 68.4/80.9%, Dobutamine: 79.6/85.1%, Dipyridamole: 71.0/92.2%, Tap-TTE: 90.7/86.1%, and Tap-TEE: 86.2/91.3%. Covariate analysis showed that the discriminatory power of Exercise decreased with increasing mean age.

CONCLUSIONS

Tap-TEE is a very accurate test for both ruling in and ruling out CAD although its invasiveness may limit its clinical acceptability. Exercise is a well-balanced satisfactory test for both ruling in and ruling out but performance might be lower for the elderly. Dobutamine offers a reasonable compromise for Exercise. Dipyridamole might be good for ruling in but not for ruling out CAD. The incapability in ruling-out CAD was a major problem in clinical application of the stress. Adenosine was the least useful stressor in diagnosing CAD.

Marked differences between patients referred for stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging studies

BACKGROUND

Patients referred for stress echocardiography may differ significantly from those referred for stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Such differences, if present, should be considered when comparing the accuracy and discriminatory performance of these tests.

METHODS

We prospectively collected demographic and clinical information on all stress imaging studies performed at our institution between 1998 and 2001. The data were reviewed, summarized, and compared using the t test and chi2 test where appropriate.

RESULTS

Of 5320 stress imaging studies performed, 3383 were stress echocardiographies and 1937 were MPI studies. Patients referred for MPI were older (59 vs 54, P < .0001), and more likely to have diabetes (32% vs 20%, P < .0001), prior myocardial infarction (39% vs 15%, P < .0001), and prior revascularization (38% vs 12%, P < .0001). Pharmacologic stress testing was much more common in the MPI group (66% vs 17%, P < .0001). More patients referred for MPI had decreased left ventricular function (23% vs 7%, P < .0001) and abnormal stress test results (41% vs 18%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, revascularization, or higher risk profiles are more likely to be referred for MPI compared to stress echocardiography at our institution. These differences in referral patterns are likely to exist in other centers, and it is reasonable to assume that systematic differences in test selection occur, resulting in patient populations with differing clinical risk profiles. Caution in interpreting analyses comparing the accuracy of stress imaging modalities is appropriate.

Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with myocardial perfusion scanning in patients unable to perform exercise tests

PURPOSE

To compare the long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography and dobutamine stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients unable to perform an exercise test.

METHODS

We assessed the prognostic value of dobutamine stress technetium 99m ((99m)Tc)-sestamibi SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography in 301 patients who were unable to perform exercise tests. Outcomes during a mean (+/- SD) follow-up of 7.3 +/- 2.8 years were overall death, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and late (>60 days) coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

Abnormal myocardial perfusion was detected in 66% of patients (n = 198), while 60% (n = 182) had an abnormal stress echocardiogram; agreement was 82% (kappa = 0.62). During the follow-up period, 100 deaths (33%) occurred, of which 43% were due to cardiac causes. Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 23 patients (8%), and 29 (10%) underwent late revascularization. With stress SPECT, annual event rates were 0.7% for cardiac death and 3.6% for all cardiac events after a normal scan, and 2.6% for cardiac death and 6.5% for all cardiac events after an abnormal scan (P <0.0001). For stress echocardiography, annual event rates were 0.6% for cardiac death and 3.3% for all cardiac events after a normal test, and 2.8% for cardiac death and 6.9% for all cardiac events after an abnormal test (P <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Dobutamine stress (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography provide comparable long-term prognostic information in addition to that afforded by clinical data.

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence

This review summarises the evidence for the role of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. It is the product of a consensus conference organised by the British Cardiac Society, the British Nuclear Cardiology Society and the British Nuclear Medicine Society and is endorsed by the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Radiologists. It was used to inform the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence in their appraisal of MPS in patients with chest pain and myocardial infarction. MPS is a well-established, non-invasive imaging technique with a large body of evidence to support its effectiveness in the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. It is more accurate than the exercise ECG in detecting myocardial ischaemia and it is the single most powerful technique for predicting future coronary events. The high diagnostic accuracy of MPS allows reliable risk stratification and guides the selection of patients for further interventions, such as revascularisation. This in turn allows more appropriate utilisation of resources, with the potential for both improved clinical outcomes and greater cost-effectiveness. Evidence from modelling and observational studies supports the enhanced cost-effectiveness associated with MPS use. In patients presenting with stable or acute chest pain, strategies of investigation involving MPS are more cost-effective than those not using the technique. MPS also has particular advantages over alternative techniques in the management of a number of patient subgroups, including women, the elderly and those with diabetes, and its use will have a favourable impact on cost-effectiveness in these groups. MPS is already an integral part of many clinical guidelines for the investigation and management of angina and myocardial infarction. However, the technique is underutilised in the UK, as judged by the inappropriately long waiting times and by comparison with the numbers of revascularisations and coronary angiograms performed. Furthermore, MPS activity levels in this country fall far short of those in comparable European countries, with about half as many scans being undertaken per year. Currently, the number of MPS studies performed annually in the UK is 1,200/million population/year. We estimate the real need to be 4,000/million/year. The current average waiting time is 20 weeks and we recommend that clinically appropriate upper limits of waiting time are 6 weeks for routine studies and 1 week for urgent studies.

Acute beta-blockade reduces the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects with dipyridamole Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to examine the effect of acute beta-blockade on dipyridamole Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging (DMPI).

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that antianginal drugs may reduce the presence and severity of myocardial perfusion defects with dipyridamole stress. However, there are no data regarding specific drugs.

METHODS

Patients with catheterization-proven coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and randomly assigned to DMPI after placebo, low-dose metoprolol (up to 10 mg), and high-dose metoprolol (up to 20 mg). Patients underwent one Tc-99m sestamibi study at rest on a separate day. The interval between DMPI studies was <or=14 days. Images were interpreted by three observers blinded to clinical data using a 17-segment, five-point model. For each image, a summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS) were calculated (SDS = SSS - SRS). Images with an SSS <4 were considered normal.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients completed all four Tc-99m sestamibi studies. The sensitivity of DMPI for detection of CAD was 85.7% with placebo versus 71.4% with low- and high-dose metoprolol. In comparison with placebo, the SSS was significantly lower (p < 0.05) with low- and high-dose metoprolol (12.0 +/- 10.1 vs. 8.7 +/- 9.0 and 9.3 +/- 10.6, respectively). The SDS also was significantly lower (8.4 +/- 8.8 with placebo vs. 5.0 +/- 6.7 [p < 0.001] and 5.4 +/- 7.9 [p < 0.01] with low- and high-dose metoprolol, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and severity of CAD may be underestimated in patients receiving beta-blocker therapy undergoing dipyridamole stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Which is the better method in detecting significant left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis during contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography: coronary flow velocity reserve or wall-motion assessment?

The diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) depends on wall-motion assessment. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) during DSE can be measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. To investigate comparative diagnostic accuracy between wall-motion and CFVR assessment in the detection of significant left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis, 274 patients underwent both contrast-enhanced DSE and coronary angiography. Intravenous contrast agent, Levovist, was injected to enhance left ventricular endocardial border delineation and coronary flow velocity in the LAD. Wall motion was assessed by standard technique, and CFVR was calculated as coronary flow velocity at peak dobutamine stress divided by baseline coronary flow velocity by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. CFVR could be successfully obtained in 232 patients (feasibility, 85%). After excluding 14 patients with isolated diagonal stenosis, CFVR was significantly lower in 65 patients with significant LAD stenosis than it was in 153 patients without stenosis (1.62 +/- 0.56 vs 2.72 +/- 0.94, P <.001). CFVR < or = 2.0 had a 75% sensitivity, a 81% specificity, and a 79% diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant LAD stenosis, and these values were comparable with those by wall-motion analysis (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 89%; and diagnostic accuracy, 86%). The measurement of CFVR in the LAD during DSE was feasible and the diagnostic accuracy of CFVR was equivalent to wall-motion assessment in the detection of LAD stenosis.

Can CK-MB and cTn-I be detected in the peripheral circulation within the first 10 min of acute coronary ischemia?

There are approximately 4 million patients hospitalized with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) annually. However, the current standard tools for assessing ACS in the Emergency Department are felt to have insufficient sensitivity and specificity. Animal studies have demonstrated that CK-MB and troponin-I are released in a biphasic pattern with an initial transient release which peaks and falls within the first 10 min of ischemia. We hypothesize that transient elevations of CK-MB and troponin-I can be detected in the peripheral circulation within the first 10 min of ischemia in a human model of brief coronary ischemia. We also present results from our pilot study that failed to confirm this hypothesis; however, this pilot studied was insufficiently powered to detect potentially clinically important results.

Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although noninvasive pharmacologic stress tests are widely used, their relative performance is not clear. We compared the performance of pharmacologic stress tests combined with echocardiography or nuclear imaging for the diagnosis of coronary disease.

METHODS

We performed a regression meta-analysis of published data. We included studies published between January 1975 and June 1999 in which subjects underwent echocardiographic or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) stress testing with adenosine, dipyridamole, or dobutamine for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. All subjects also underwent coronary angiography. Two independent reviewers abstracted population characteristics, technical factors, methodologic factors, and results and calculated test sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Eighty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity of dipyridamole SPECT imaging, 89% (95% CI, 84%-93%), was higher than that of dipyridamole echocardiography, but the specificity of dipyridamole SPECT imaging, 65% (95% CI, 54%-74%), was lower than that of dipyridamole echocardiography. Dipyridamole and adenosine tests had similar sensitivities and specificities. The sensitivity of dobutamine echocardiography, 80% (95% CI, 77%-83%) was similar to that of dobutamine SPECT imaging, but dobutamine echocardiography had a higher specificity, 84% (95% CI, 80%-86%) than dobutamine SPECT imaging did.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study can be used to guide the selection of the optimal pharmacologic stress test for each patient. Maximum sensitivity can be attained by use of a vasodilator combined with SPECT imaging. Maximum specificity can be attained by use of a vasodilator with echocardiography. The highest combination of sensitivity and specificity can be attained with dobutamine echocardiography.

Coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain who have low-risk clinical characteristics and negative cardiac troponin I

Patients who have low-risk clinical features and negative cardiac troponin levels may be suitable for early discharge after a brief period of observation in the emergency department (ED). Little is known about the prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease in such patients, although this has implications for follow-up. Subjects included 570 patients who were at < or =7% risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), remained clinically stable (defined as the absence of new ischemic changes on their electrocardiograph, signs or symptoms of heart failure, the development of a cardiac arrhythmia or hypotension requiring either inotropes or volume repletion) and had cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels <0.2 microgl(-1) during the initial 12 hours of hospitalization. Clinical features were documented and those undergoing stress tests and/or coronary angiograms had these graded by 2 independent observers. Overall, 190 (33.3%) of this population, who might be considered suitable for early discharge, had objective evidence of coronary artery disease. Patients with chest pain who are at low risk of AMI, remain clinically stable and have negative cTnI over the initial 12 hours of observation are a heterogeneous population, some of who have threatening coronary disease. This does not preclude early discharge from the ED but emphasizes the need for careful assessment and follow-up.

Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of 1,764 patients

OBJECTIVES

This study correlated the electron beam computed tomographic (EBCT) calcium scores with the results of coronary angiography in symptomatic patients in order to assess its value to predict or exclude significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Electron beam computed tomography is a sensitive method to detect coronary calcium. However, it is unclear whether it may play a role as a filter before invasive procedures in symptomatic patients.

METHODS

A total of 1,764 patients (1,225 men and 539 women) with suspected CAD from a single center were included in our study. All patients underwent calcium screening with EBCT (C150XP Imatron) and conventional coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Fifty-six percent of men and 47% of women revealed significant coronary stenoses (> or =50%). Total exclusion of coronary calcium (14% of the study group) was associated with an extremely low probability of stenosis (<1%). With calcium scores > or =20th, > or =100th or > or =75th percentile of age groups, the sensitivity to detect stenoses decreased to 97%, 93% and 81%, respectively, in men and to 98%, 82% and 76%, respectively, in women. At the same time, the specificity increased up to 77% in men and women. There was a significant difference in coronary calcium between men and women in all age groups; however, receiver-operating characteristic curves indicated that the test can be performed with equal accuracy in all of these subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium screening with EBCT is a highly sensitive and moderately specific test to predict stenotic disease. Exclusion of coronary calcium defines a substantial subgroup of patients, albeit symptomatic, with a very low probability of significant stenoses.

Stress testing for risk stratification of patients with low to moderate probability of acute cardiac ischemia

In summary, this article focused on the use of stress testing to risk-stratify patients at the conclusion of their emergency evaluation for ACI. As discussed, those patients in the probably not ACI category require additional risk stratification prior to discharge. It should be kept in mind that patients in this category are heterogeneous, containing subgroups at both higher and lower risk of ACI and cardiac events. The patients with lower pretest probability for ACI may only need exercise testing in the ED. Patients with higher pretest probability should undergo myocardial perfusion or echocardiographic stress testing to maximize diagnostic and prognostic information. Prognostic information is the key to provocative testing in the ED. Prognostic information is the component that will help emergency physicians identify the patients who may be discharged home safely without having to worry about a 6% annual cardiac death rate and a 10% overall death rate over the next 30 months. Stress testing provides this key prognostic data, and it can be obtained in short-stay chest pain observation units in a safe, timely, and cost-effective fashion.

Overview of stress echocardiography: uses, advantages, and limitations

Responses of the heart to changes in our environment are probably even more important than how the heart functions at rest. Accordingly, stress testing with noninvasive imaging has become important for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring the effects of therapy. Echocardiography at rest and with stress permits characterization of global and segmental left ventricular function as well as valvular structure and function. Moreover, echocardiography can be performed during or after a number of different physical or even mental stressors. Advantages of stress echocardiography include its ready availability, relatively low capital cost, and incremental value in that it allows characterization of cardiac anatomy as well as the myocardial response to a potentially ischemic stimulus. Moreover, echocardiography has the potential to image myocardial perfusion along with wall motion and wall thickening. Substantial literature has now been accumulated on the value of stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of ischemic disease, preoperative risk assessment, and assessment of myocardial viability. Echocardiography has compared generally well with nuclear imaging techniques for the detection of angiographic coronary artery disease. Overall sensitivity, however, has been slightly less, particularly for the detection of single-vessel coronary disease, although specificity has been on average somewhat higher than nuclear cardiology techniques. Because of the potential for variability in study acquisition as well as interpretation, careful safeguards need to be employed. Specifically, meticulous technique needs to be applied to obtain high-quality images and to assure that those images are obtained promptly after treadmill exercise stress. Only readers with specific interest and expertise should interpret stress echocardiography studies. Continuing efforts need to be made to assess and minimize variability and to assure continuing quality improvement. Advances in instrumentation, including evolving technology for real-time 3-dimensional imaging, and echocardiography contrast assessment of myocardial perfusion will likely improve the sensitivity of echocardiography and further extend its usefulness.

Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging

In patients with limited exercise capacity and (relative) contraindications to direct vasodilators such as dipyridamole or adenosine, dobutamine stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (DSMPI) represents an alternative, exercise-independent stress modality for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Nondiagnostic test results (absence of reversible perfusion defects with submaximal stress) do occur in approximately 10% of patients. Serious side effects during DSMPI are rare, with no death, myocardial infarction or ventricular fibrillation reported in three DSMPI safety reports for a total of 2,574 patients. On the basis of a total number of 1,014 patients reported in 20 studies, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the test for the detection of CAD were 88%, 74% and 84%, respectively. Mean sensitivities for one-, two- and three-vessel disease were 84%, 95% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity for detection of left circumflex CAD (50%) was lower, compared with that for left anterior descending CAD (68%) and right CAD (88%). The sensitivity of predicting multivessel disease by multiregion perfusion abnormalities varied widely, from 44% to 89%, although specificity was excellent in all studies (89% to 94%). In direct diagnostic comparisons, DSMPI was more sensitive, but less specific, than dobutamine stress echocardiography and comparable with direct vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging. In the largest prognostic study, patients with a normal DSMPI study had an annual hard event rate less than 1%. An ischemic scan pattern provided independent prognostic value, with a direct relationship between the extent and severity of the perfusion defects and prognosis. In conclusion, DSMPI seems a safe and useful nonexercise-dependent stress modality to detect CAD and assess prognosis.

Detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease with accelerated intermittent imaging after intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast material

BACKGROUND

Accelerated intermittent harmonic imaging (AII) is used to detect myocardial perfusion abnormalities after intravenous injection of ultrasound contrast medium. A low mechanical index and frame rates of 10 to 20 Hz are used to allow simultaneous wall motion analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the myocardial contrast enhancement achieved with AII can be used to detect angiographically significant coronary artery disease during stress echocardiography.

METHODS

We gave intravenous perfluorocarbon containing microbubbles to 45 patients (total of 270 regions) during dobutamine (n = 27) or exercise (n = 18) stress testing with AII. Quantitative angiography was performed on all patients after the stress echocardiograms were interpreted.

RESULTS

Quantitative angiography showed >50% diameter stenosis of at least 1 vessel in 32 patients (total of 118 regions). There were visually evident contrast defects in 100 (85%) of these regions, and wall motion was abnormal in 64 (54%). Overall, there was agreement between regional perfusion and quantitative angiographic findings in 217 of the 270 regions (kappa = 0.61; 80% agreement). Agreement with findings at quantitative angiography was good for both dobutamine stress (kappa = 0.66; 83% agreement) and exercise (kappa = 0.53; 77% agreement). The greatest incremental benefit of AII versus wall motion was gained during dobutamine stress. The contrast studies depicted 90% of the regions supplied by a vessel with >50% stenosis, whereas wall motion depicted only 32% (P =.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicated that accelerated intermittent perfusion imaging during stress echocardiography can improve the sensitivity of the study in detecting angiographically significant coronary artery disease, especially during dobutamine stress.

The comparable diagnostic accuracies of dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine-stress and dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies are widely used for pharmacological stress echocardiography, with wide geographical variations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether evidence derived from the literature indicates or disapproves that either stress modality confers diagnostic superiority.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature of published trials with head-to-head comparison, on the same population, of high-dose (0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole-stress versus high-dose (up to 40 micrograms/kg per min) dobutamine-stress echocardiography. Data from 12 studies performed in 12 institutions in seven countries were analysed. Angiographic information about 818 patients was considered.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracies of the two tests were similar (631 of 818, 77%, for dipyridamole versus 654 of 818, 80%, for dobutamine, NS). Overall sensitivities were 403 of 568 (71%) for dipyridamole and 437 of 568 (77%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with single-vessel disease were 177 of 275 (64%) for dipyridamole and 203 of 275 (74%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Sensitivities for patients with multivessel disease were 162 of 203 (80%) for dipyridamole and 163 of 203 (80%) for dobutamine (NS). Specificities were 232 of 250 (93%) for dipyridamole and 217 of 250 (87%) for dobutamine (P < 0.05). Data from an additional 26 studies with dipyridamole alone and 47 studies with dobutamine alone were analysed. The diagnostic accuracies were 80% for dipyridamole (n = 2038 patients; 95% confidence interval 75-82%) and 82% for dobutamine (n = 4264 patients; 95% confidence interval 79-84%).

CONCLUSION

High-dose dobutamine-stress and high-dose dipyridamole-stress echocardiographies have comparable diagnostic accuracies, with a slightly higher sensitivity with dobutamine and a slightly higher specificity with dipyridamole.

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Stress perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography (ECHO) are both very useful for assessment of diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Both techniques have been well validated during exercise and inotropic stress, but coronary vasodilation stress is better used in combination with perfusion imaging. The overall sensitivity for detection of CAD is slightly higher by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) than by two-dimensional (2D) ECHO during all stress modalities, whereas the specificity is slightly higher by ECHO, although the differences in general are not statistically significant. SPECT, however, appears to be superior to ECHO in the diagnosis of isolated circumflex stenosis, as well as for the correct identification of multivessel CAD. A substantially greater amount of information is available regarding risk stratification with SPECT than with 2D ECHO. Although the data suggest that both techniques are very useful for risk stratification of patients with stable CAD, after myocardial infarction, and for preoperative risk stratification, the risk for cardiac events is lower in the presence of a normal stress SPECT study than of a normal stress ECHO.

Dipyridamole stress echocardiography

Dipyridamole stress is the forerunner and prototype of pharmacological stress echo tests in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The safety of this test has been conclusively demonstrated as a result of extensive experience in large-scale multicenter projects. The diagnostic accuracy of dipyridamole stress echo is comparable to dobutamine and largely a function of the employed dose. Higher dosages (up to 0.84 mg/kg) are being required to achieve good sensitivity. The prognostic value has been shown to be independent and additive to clinical, exercise echocardiogram, and angiographic data. The test positive response should be titrated on the basis of severity, extent, and timing of induced dyssynergy with low positivity being associated to more anatomically and functionally severe forms of disease. Multicenter, randomized, prospective, international studies on cost-effectiveness directly comparing a noninvasive strategy centered on stress echo versus an invasive strategy centered on coronary angiography are currently ongoing.