Hand-assisted laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and lymphadenectomy

Reverse rolling-mat type lymph node dissection is the key step to solve the operative difficulties in hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy

Background

We have improved and named a new reverse rolling-mat type lymph node dissection, which effectively solves the dilemma faced by the traditional lymph node dissection in hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy through the optimization of the surgical procedure. However, the relevant clinical data are still scarce. The study aims to compare the clinical effects of two surgical procedure and explore the safety and feasibility of “reverse procedure”.

Study design

The clinicopathological data of 195 patients who underwent hand-assisted D2 radical total gastrectomy (HALTG) in our hospital from January 2011 to September 2017 were collected. A retrospective case–control study was used to compare the clinical outcomes of the two patterns of lymph node dissection. Among them, 89 patients underwent “cabbage type” lymph node dissection and 106 patients underwent the “reverse procedure” lymph node dissection.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups of patients in terms of gender, age, tumor location, incision length, postoperative hospitalization duration, pathological classification, recent complications, long-term recurrence and metastasis. The operation time of “cabbage type” group was shorter than that of “reverse procedure” group (178.35 ± 31.52 min vs 191.25 ± 32.77 min; P = 0.006). While, in the “reverse procedure” group, intraoperative blood loss was less (249.4 ± 143.12 vs 213.58 ± 101.43; P = 0.049), and there were more numbers of lymph nodes dissected (18.04 ± 7.00 vs 32.25 ± 14.23; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The pattern of reverse rolling-mat type lymph node dissection in HALTG perform well in terms of safety and feasibility.

Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: A retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (LAPG-JI) is not yet widely used because the three anastomotic procedures involved in this operation are technically complicated. This study aimed to describe our surgical procedure for LAPG-JI and assess its feasibility and safety.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 70 patients who had undergone proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach between July 2007 and October 2016. Of these patients, 32 underwent LAPG-JI, and 38 underwent open proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition. Clinical characteristics and both surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared between LAPG-JI and open proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition.

RESULTS

The operation time was longer in the LAPG-JI group (189 vs 154 min, P < 0.001) and estimated blood loss was lower (30 vs 180 mL, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the rates of early (9.4% vs 13.2%) or late postoperative complications (12.5% vs 10.5%). No anastomotic leakage was observed in either group. In the LAPG-JI group, the time to first eating was shorter, and the white blood cell counts on postoperative days 1 and 7 and body temperature on postoperative day 3 were lower. The number of additional doses of postoperative analgesia was lower in the LAPG-JI group. Reflux esophagitis graded C according to the Los Angeles classification was observed in only one patient (3.1%) in the LAPG-JI group.

CONCLUSION

Although the operation time was longer in the LAPG-JI group, the procedure seemed to be feasible and safe. Also, it offered the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, including less invasiveness and quicker recovery.

A newly modified esophagogastrostomy with a reliable angle of His by placing a gastric tube in the lower mediastinum in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

An optimal reconstruction method for proximal gastrectomy (PG) remains elusive. Esophagogastrostomy (EG) is technically simple but suffers from the disadvantage of gastroesophageal reflux. Jejunal interposition (JI) has a low rate of gastroesophageal reflux, but the procedure is more complicated, and delayed gastric emptying is a problem.

METHODS

We created a modified EG and have used the modified technique for PG since 2006. The procedure involves shaping the remnant stomach into a gastric conduit. The EG is performed high on the anterior wall, and the conduit is kept straight by applying a circular stapler inserted from the anterior wall of the antrum. The tip of the gastric conduit is then inserted into the lower mediastinum, creating a sharp angle of His. In this retrospective cohort study, the clinical and physiological outcomes were compared between 25 patients who underwent this procedure and 21 patients who underwent JI from 2001 to 2005.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic procedures were performed more frequently, and residual food and bile reflux were less common in the EG group than in the JI group. No significant differences in remnant gastritis or reflux esophagitis were observed between the two groups. However, the late complication of intestinal obstruction occurred only in the JI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified EG technique has advantages over the JI technique because of its simplicity and low incidence of residual food and bile reflux. The next step would be to explore this technique further by a prospective multi-institutional study to confirm the reproducibility of its benefits. Miniabstract: The modified EG technique has advantages over the JI technique because of its simplicity, high rate of laparoscopy use, and low incidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy has been applied to the treatment of gastric cancer. However, there have been few reports on the laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer, mainly because of the difficulty of the procedure.

METHODS

Here, we report a series of cases where the hand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomies with regional lymph node dissection were performed successfully.

RESULTS

The average operative time was 245 minutes. The mean blood loss was 110 mL. The number of dissected lymph nodes per patient was beyond 15 nodes satisfying a reliable evaluation of nodal status. All resection specimens had no residual tumor at the proximal or distal resection margins. The mean oral feeding was 3.6 days. The mean postoperative length of stay was 8.7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is both technically feasible and safe.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: a retrospective comparison with open surgery

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cancer in the proximal third of the stomach is increasing. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) seems an attractive option for the treatment of early-stage proximal gastric cancer but has not gained wide acceptance because of technical difficulties, including the prevention of severe reflux. In this study, we describe our technique for LPG with jejunal interposition (LPG-IP) and evaluate its safety and feasibility.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed the data of patients with proximal gastric cancer who underwent LPG-IP (n = 22) or the same procedure with open surgery (OPG-IP; n = 68) between January 2008 and September 2011. Short-term surgical variables and outcomes were compared between the groups. The reconstruction method was the same in both groups, with creation of a 15 cm, single-loop, jejunal interposition for anastomosis.

RESULTS

There were no differences in patient or tumor characteristics between the groups. Operation time was longer in the LGP-IP group (233 vs. 201 min, p = 0.0002) and estimated blood loss was significantly less (20 vs. 242 g, p < 0.0001). The average number of harvested lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups (17 vs. 20). There also were no differences in the incidence of leakage at the esophagojejunostomy anastomosis (9.1 vs. 7.4%) or other postoperative complications (27 vs. 32%). The number of times additional postoperative analgesia was required was significantly less in the LPG-IP group compared with the OPG-IP group (2 vs. 4, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

LPG-IP has equivalent safety and curability compared with OPG-IP. Our results imply that LPG-IP may lead to faster recovery, better cosmesis, and improved quality of life in the short-term compared with OPG-IP. Because of the limitations of retrospective analysis, a further study should be conducted to obtain definitive conclusions.

Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Japanese experiences

Since development of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection in 1991 in Japan, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LAG) is improving and evolving. Recently, advanced LAG techniques including D2 lymph node dissection or anastomosis after total gastrectomy have been developed. Retrospective and prospective multicenter studies have been conducted for early and non-early gastric cancers to establish high-quality evidence. This review summarizes the current trends of minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer based on current Japanese experiences.

Revisional surgery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: review of the literature

Recent reports have shown that morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for gastric cancer vary between authors, countries, and procedures. Common complications related to gastrectomy are postoperative bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic juice leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction, wound dehiscence, and so on. Recently, laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has developed, especially in Japan and East Asian countries because it is less invasive. Several retrospective studies have shown that the operative complication rate is similar to that of conventional open surgery. Although most postoperative complications can be successfully treated by conservative therapies, surgical management is occasionally needed to prevent a fatal outcome. This review article provides insight into how surgeons can make efforts to reduce postoperative complications through proper preoperative evaluation and improved surgical skills during the initial gastrectomy. In addition, it reviews guidance for timely revisional surgery to allow salvage of patients with serious acute operative complications based on clinical findings made by a group of experienced surgeons.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer

There are three procedures for the management of early gastric cancer (EGC): laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR), intragastric mucosal resection (IGMR), and laparoscopic gastrectomy. LWR or IGMR can be applied to treat EGC without the risk of lymph node metastasis. However, owing to the recent technical advances in endoscopic mucosal resection for EGC, the use of laparoscopic local resection for these lesions has gradually decreased. On the other hand, laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection, such as laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy, is widely accepted for the treatment of EGC with the risk of lymph node metastasis. To establish the acceptability of laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection against advanced gastric cancers, safe techniques and new instruments must be developed. The following advantages of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer have been well demonstrated: clinical course after operation, pulmonary function, immune response. In the future, laparoscopic surgeons have to design and implement education and training systems for standard laparoscopic procedures, evaluate clinical outcomes by multicentric randomized control trial studies, and clarify the oncological aspects of laparoscopic surgery in basic studies.