The role of infrarenal aortic side branches in the pathogenesis of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

Endovascular Treatment of an Endoleak Causing Rupture of a Previously Bypassed Popliteal Aneurysm

Enlargement of a previously bypassed popliteal aneurysm is rare. However, the possibility exists for persistent aneurysm expansion via geniculate collaterals. The authors report herein a patient who underwent successful endovascular treatment of a ruptured popliteal aneurysm that had been previously bypassed and presumably excluded.

Predictive Factors for Type II Endoleaks after Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Conventional Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks (EL-II) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We assessed the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography data of 308 patients who underwent EVAR between 2000 and 2012 and in 84 of whom primary or secondary EL-II occurred. The data analyzed were: demographics, number and diameter of lumbar arteries (LAs), inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), median sacral artery (MSA), accessory renal arteries (ARas), maximum diameter of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, diameter and length of proximal aortic neck. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software (version 12). Categorical parameters were compared between groups using chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. Continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate (normality studied by the Shapiro-Wilk and homoscedasticity verified using the Fisher-Snedecor test).

RESULTS

Of the 308 patients included (mean age, 73.8 ± 8.74 years), 284 (92%) were men, 61 (20%) were smokers, 113 (37%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 215 (70%) were taking antiplatelet. Respectively, 13, 51, 60, 103, 28, 40, 2, and 7 patients had 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 patent LAs. Before surgery, 221 IMAs and 136 MSA were patent. The sources of EL-II were: LA (n = 51), IMA (n = 22), MSA (n = 1), IMA and LA (n = 8), IMA and ARa (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). Logistic regression models adjusting for clinically relevant covariables (age, American Society of Anesthesiologists, smoking status, dyslipidemia, and diuretics) were proposed to study morphologic EL-II predictive factors, first in the entire population, and then in the more specific population for whom IMA was patent. Risk factors of occurrence EL-II were: permeability of the IMA (70 patients [83%] vs. 155 [69%], P = 0.01), IMA diameter (3.49 mm vs. 2.71 mm, P < 0.001), number of LAs patent higher than or equal to 4 (P < 0.001), the mean LA diameter greater than 2.4 mm (P < 0.001), and MSA diameter (2.28 mm vs. 1.94 mm; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show the major role of the number and diameter of the patent aortic branches in the development of EL-II. As they can result in complications increasing the morbidity and mortality after EVAR, it is relevant to identify the risk factors of their occurrence.

Endovascular chimney technique for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review using pooled analysis and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of chimney endovascular abdominal aortic repair (Ch-EVAR) for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.

METHODS

Electronic literature published between 2003 and 2014 were searched from MEDLINE and EMBASE online databases. Inclusion criteria for articles included that more than 3 patients were enrolled, chimney graft techniques were used, and the basic outcomes, such as indications, mortality within 30-day or during follow-up, complications, endoleaks, and branch vessel patency were collected. The data were pooled for analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata version 11 and heterogeneity was estimated using Cochrane Q statistic and I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

In total, 12 electronic literature met the inclusion criteria and 236 patients (mean age, 73.9 years) undergone Ch-EVAR were collected. A total of 335 chimney grafts were implanted, including 288 to the renal arteries and 47 to superior mesenteric arteries. Mortality (<30 days) and mortality (during follow-up; a mean of 12 months) were 3.8% (9/236) and 10.6% (25/236), respectively. The rate of type I, II and III endoleaks during follow-up was 11.8% (28/236), 8.1% (19/236), and 0.4% (1/236), respectively. The chimney graft patency at 6 month was 96.6%. Meta-analysis showed that the rates of endoleaks (during follow-up), mortality (<30 days) and mortality (during follow-up) were 18%, 7% and 13%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chimney graft is an efficient therapy with high initial technical success rate and favorable rates for perioperative outcomes.

Type 2 Endoleaks after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Stent Grafting with Systematic Mesenteric and Lumbar Coil Embolization

We evaluated the results of our policy of systematic coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and/or lumbar arteries (LAs) prior to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR). We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing EVAR over a 4-year period at one hospital. Results were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses. Fifty-five male patients with an average age of 71 years were evaluated. Follow-up averaged 15 +/- 13 months. The IMA was either coiled or occluded in 30 cases. One or more LAs were coiled in 29 patients. An average of 1.3 LAs per patients were coiled (range 0-6). There were no immediate or late complications from coiling. At last follow-up, 14 AAAs showed no change in diameter, one increased by 2 mm, and the remainder (n = 40) decreased by 7.5 +/- 6 mm in maximal diameter. Only five (9%) type 2 endoleaks were detected during follow-up. Three were associated with AAA size increase. Four of the five were treated with additional coiling, with good results. By logistic regression, neither endoleak occurrence nor AAA shrinkage correlated with LA or IMA coiling. However, by multivariate analysis, completeness of lumbar coiling correlated negatively with aneurysm shrinkage (p = 0.04) and IMA coiling correlated positively with aneurysm shrinkage (p = 0.04). Coil embolization of the IMA and/or LAs prior to EVAR can be safely accomplished in a large number of cases and is associated with a low incidence of type 2 endoleaks. We cannot at present demonstrate a benefit to LA embolization in terms of endoleak prevention or AAA shrinkage. However, IMA embolization may be of benefit in terms of AAA shrinkage.

Frequency and Significance of Lumbar and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Perfusion After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

To evaluate the frequency and influence of perfused side branches (lumbar arteries [LA] and inferior mesenteric artery trunks) on development of type II endoleaks (EL-II) and on volume changes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) after endovascular repair.

METHODS

Of 114 patients undergoing EVR of AAA, 89 patients (83 men; mean age 72+/-7.5 years, range 51-88) with >6 months' follow-up and no type I endoleaks were retrospectively analyzed to determine any relationships between retrograde perfusion, endoleaks, and sac volume. Data were derived from computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) scans taken before and after intervention, at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, and semi-annually thereafter in follow-up. Two groups were identified and compared based on their status at 6 months post EVR: without perfused side branches (group 1) and with perfused collaterals (group 2); group 2 was further divided according to the absence (2a) or presence (2b) of endoleak.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 24 months (range 6-36). Based on a total of 582 CTAs analyzed, 17 (19%) patients developed type II endoleaks (EL-II) during follow-up. There was a significant difference in the number of perfused LAs prior to EVR between groups 1 (n=44) and the 45 patients with postprocedural patent collateral arteries in group 2 (p<0.05); there was no significant difference between groups 2a and 2b (p=0.88) relative to the number of pre-existing patent collaterals. The number of pLAs preoperatively and the rate of type II endoleak were significantly correlated (p<0.05). No type II endoleak was seen in patients without perfused side branches (p=0.01). No significant differences in mean volumes were found between groups 1 and 2a (no EL-II), but significant differences between groups 1 and 2b were seen in later follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A larger number of patent LAs before EVR was associated with a significantly higher rate of type II endoleak. Patent collateral vessels were common after aneurysm repair, but the frequency decreased during follow-up. Persistent side branch perfusion was associated with increased type II endoleak after endovascular AAA repair. Significant differences in volume changes in later follow-up were seen between patients with or without type II endoleak.

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become widely used. Supporters claim high success rates, few complications and a dramatically reduced hospital stay. However, endoleak, endotension and reports of endoprosthesis rupture are causes of concern.

METHODS

A Medline search was undertaken to identify articles on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Additional papers were identified by manual scanning of the references from key articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Endoleak is a potentially serious complication of the endovascular technique and occurs in a significant proportion of patients. It is still not possible to judge whether the presence of an endoleak alone signifies failure of treatment, and the long-term durability of prosthetic covered stents is unknown. However, endovascular repair does appear to confer a degree of protection from rupture although patients must be advised of the need for life-long imaging surveillance and, perhaps, further intervention.

The Renal Impact of Aortic Stent-Grafting in Patients with a Horseshoe Kidney

Aortic stent grafting may be an alternative to surgery for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm and coexistent horseshoe kidney but is not without difficulties. This study examines the renal consequences of aortic stent grafting in such patients. This is a retrospective review of patients with horseshoe kidney in whom aortic stent grafting was performed between December 1995 and August 2000. Follow-up occurred within the EUROSTAR protocol and included measurement of serum creatinine. Of 130 patients in whom aortic stent grafting was performed, 4 had coexistent horseshoe kidney. In all patients the aneurysm was successfully excluded with the occlusion of between one and four anomalous renal arteries. At follow-up, no clinically significant renal impairment was detected. Endovascular aneurysm repair is an attractive option for patients with a horseshoe kidney and normal preoperative creatinine levels.

Modeling endoleaks and collateral reperfusion following endovascular AAA exclusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect on intrasac pressure of stent-graft deployment within a life-size silicone rubber model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maintained under physiological conditions of pressure and flow.

METHODS

A commercial bifurcated device with the polyester fabric preclotted with gelatin was deployed in the AAA model. A pump system generated physiological flow. Mean and pulse aortic and intrasac pressures were measured simultaneously using pressure transducers. To simulate a type I endoleak, plastic tubing was placed between the aortic wall and the stent-graft at the proximal anchoring site. Type II endoleak was simulated by means of side branches with set inflow and outflow pressures and perfusion rates. Type IV endoleak was replicated by removal of gelatin from the graft fabric.

RESULTS

With no endoleak, the coated graft reduced the mean and pulse sac pressures to negligible values. When a type I endoleak was present, mean sac pressure reached a value similar to mean aortic pressure. When net flow through the sac due to a type II endoleak was present, mean sac pressure was a function of the inlet pressure, while pulse pressure in the sac was dependent on both inlet and outlet pressures. As perfusion rates increased, both mean and pulse sac pressures decreased. When there was no outflow, mean sac pressure was similar to mean aortic pressure. In the presence of both type I and type II endoleaks, mean sac pressure reached mean aortic pressure when the net perfusion rate was low.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro studies are useful in gaining an understanding of the impact of different types of endoleaks, in isolation and in combination, on intrasac pressure after aortic stent-graft deployment.

Preoperative embolization of collateral side branches: a valid means to reduce type II endoleaks after endovascular AAA repair

PURPOSE

To report the results of preprocedural embolization of collateral branches arising from abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) scheduled for endovascular repair.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive AAA patients (all men; mean age 73 years, range 56-82) had coil embolization of patent lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries (IMA) in a staged procedure prior to endovascular repair. Embolization with microcoils was attempted in 37 of the 52 identified lumbar arteries and 14 of 15 inferior mesenteric arteries. Follow-up included biplanar abdominal radiography, spiral computed tomography, and duplex ultrasonography at 1, 30, 90, and 180 days after the stent-graft procedure and at 6-month intervals thereafter.

RESULTS

Successful embolization was obtained in 24 (65%) of lumbar arteries, while all 14 (100%) IMAs were occluded with coils. No complication was associated with embolotherapy. Over a mean 17-month follow-up of 22 patients (1 intraoperative death), there was only 1 (4.5%) type II endoleak from a patent lumbar artery, with no sac expansion after 2 years. There were 4 (18%) type I and 1 (4.5%) type III endoleaks.

CONCLUSIONS

The embolization of side branches arising from an infrarenal aortic aneurysm before endovascular repair is feasible, with a high success rate; this maneuver may play a relevant role in reducing the rate of type II endoleak, improving long-term outcome.

Controversies in the management of type II "branch" endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is often defined as complete exclusion of blood flow within the aneurysm sac. Perigraft flow, also known as endoleak, is the most common complication following EVAR. Attachment site related endoleaks (type I) are generally considered to warrant some form of intervention due to the belief that they represent a risk for future rupture. Management of type II endoleaks, also known as branch or collateral endoleaks, is more controversial. Some advocate a policy of watchful-waiting whereas others treat all type II endoleaks as soon as they are discovered. The following review explores the controversies pertaining to the management, diagnosis and surveillance imaging, and treatment of type II endoleaks.

Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

PURPOSE

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is reported to result in less initial patient morbidity and a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) when compared with conventional AAA repair. We sought to examine the durability of this result during the intermediate follow-up interval.

METHODS

The records of all admissions for all patients who underwent AAA repair during a 26-month interval were reviewed.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-seven (337) patients underwent procedures to repair AAAs (163 open and 174 endovascular). Endovascular procedures were performed with a variety of devices (Talent, 108; Ancure, 36; AneuRx, 26; Zenith, 2; and Cordis, 2) and configurations (141 bifurcated and 33 aortomonoiliac). The mean follow-up period was 10.6 months (endovascular repair) and 12.3 months (open repair). LOS did not significantly vary by device (P =.24 to P =.92) or configuration (P =.24). The initial median LOS for procedures was significantly shorter (P =.009) for endovascular repairs (5 days) than for open procedures (8 days). However, the patients who underwent endovascular repair were more likely to be readmitted during the follow-up interval when compared with patients who underwent open procedure. The readmission-free survival rate after AAA repair at 12 months was 95% for patients for open AAA repair versus 71% for patients for endovascular repair (P <.001). If the total hospital days were compared, including the initial and all subsequent AAA-related admissions, there was no significant difference for mean LOS for patients who underwent endovascular versus open AAA procedures (11 days versus 13.6 days; P =.21). The patients for endovascular AAA repair most commonly needed readmission for treatment of endoleak (n = 31), wound infection (n = 12), and graft limb thrombosis (n = 9). Although women had similar LOS to men for endovascular repair (P =.44), they had longer initial LOS for open AAA repair (15 versus 10 days; P =.03). After endovascular repair, women were more likely than men to be readmitted by 12 months (51% versus 71% readmission-free survival rate; P =.03) and they had longer LOS on readmission (13.2 versus 5.2 days; P =.006). No gender differences were identified for patients after open AAA repair regarding readmission-free survival rate (P =.09) or LOS on readmission (P =.98).

CONCLUSION

Although initial LOS was shorter for the patients who underwent endovascular as compared with conventional AAA repair, this advantage was lost during the follow-up interval because of frequent readmission for the treatment of procedure-related complications, chiefly endoleak. These readmissions frequently involved the performance of additional invasive procedures. Gender differences existed regarding LOS and the likelihood of complications after open and endovascular AAA repair.

Colonic necrosis subsequent to catheter-directed thrombin embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery via the superior mesenteric artery: a complication in the management of a type II endoleak

The optimal management of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms remains to be established. In this report, we describe a persistent side-branch, or type II, endoleak 1 year after endograft implantation treated with catheter-directed embolization of the aneurysm sac and the inferior mesenteric artery via the superior mesenteric artery, with embolization agents including thrombin, lipiodol, and gelfoam powder. Shortly after the embolization procedure, colonic necrosis developed in the patient, manifested by peritonitis, which necessitated a partial colectomy. This case underscores the devastating complication of colonic ischemia as a result of catheter-directed embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery in the management of an endoleak.

Endovascular AAA repair in a patient with a horseshoe kidney and an isthmus mass

PURPOSE

To report the endovascular exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a patient with a horseshoe kidney and an isthmus mass with preservation of accessory renal vessels.

CASE REPORT

A 70-year-old man with a 5-cm AAA and renal cell carcinoma involving a horseshoe kidney was treated with an AneuRx bifurcated graft. Two accessory renal arteries believed to feed the isthmus mass were sacrificed, but 2 other accessory renal arteries from the left common iliac artery (CIA) were preserved by using an extension cuff to cover the aneurysmal left CIA distal to their origins. The right renal isthmus mass decreased in size on follow-up imaging. At 9 months, there was no endoleak evident on computed tomographic scans, and the aneurysm measured 4.8 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of accessory renal arteries in AAA patients with horseshoe kidneys should not automatically exclude them from consideration for endovascular repair. Creative stent-graft arrangements can be a treatment option.

Pressure measurements in closed aneurysmal sac during abdominal aortic aneurysm resection

PURPOSE

This study determined the relationship between closed aneurysmal sac pressure (ASP) and mean blood pressure (BP) during open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) resection and evaluated the contribution of inferior mesenteric and lumbar artery blood flow to ASP after proximal and distal clamping.

METHODS

We measured ASP after proximal and distal clamping by placing an 18-gauge needle connected to a BP transducer into the excluded aneurysmal sac in 25 consecutive patients from April 1999 to August 2000. Simultaneous measurement of the mean systemic BP was also recorded. The ratio of ASP to mean BP in relation to the number of actively bleeding lumbar arteries (N-LA), diameter of the AAA (D-Cm), and volume of the thrombus in the AAA (Vol-TA) were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean ASP was 43.32 +/- 15.19 mm Hg, with an ASP to mean BP ratio of 0.47 +/- 0.15. The N-LA in the closed aneurysmal sac ranged from 0 to 6 (mean, 3.4 +/- 1.78). The D-Cm as determined by means of computed tomography (CT) scan of the aorta ranged from 5 to 8 cm in its largest anteroposterior/transverse diameter. The average Vol-TA was 6.15 +/- 4.49 mL. Inferior mesenteric artery blood flow contributed to ASP in three patients (12%). There was no correlation between ASP to mean BP ratios and the N-LA (P =.127), D-Cm (P =.882), or Vol-TA (P =.252).

CONCLUSION

Closed ASP and ASP ratios are highly variable and do not correlate with N-LA, D-Cm, or the Vol-TA.

Aortic side branch embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair: incidence of type II endoleak

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of embolization of aortic side branches and its impact on the incidence of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed in 74 patients. Aortic side branch vessels were evaluated on the preoperative angiogram and computed tomography (CT) and, where embolization of lumbar and inferior mesenteric vessels was considered technically possible, this was attempted prior to endovascular repair. Follow-up CT was used to assess the presence of type II endoleak.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were followed up for longer than 1 month. Embolization was attempted in 25 cases, successfully in 10, with partial success in 11, and failure in four. Twenty patients with successful or partly successful preoperative embolization were discharged and followed-up. Four (20%) had demonstrable type II endoleak during follow-up, with two of these persisting at latest follow-up. Of 43 patients without previous embolization, there were 10 (23.3%) type II endoleaks during the follow-up period, four of these persisting. In cases with type II endoleak, mean sac diameter change was -0.5 mm in the cases with previous embolization and +3.1 mm without. The mean period to onset of type II endoleak was 6.9 months without, and 15.3 months with, previous embolization.

CONCLUSION

Although the cohort size is below a level that would confer significance, the trend of these findings is such as to suggest a lack of influence of aortic side branch embolization on the incidence of type II endoleak during the follow-up period.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms before and after endograft implantation: evaluation by computed tomography

The evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms for endograft candidacy and their follow-up after treatment are heavily dependent on radiologic imaging. Factors never considered during conventional open repair have become crucial to patient selection and procedural success, and the new and developing nature of the field of endovascular repair necessitates close surveillance of these devices after deployment. Computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the single most effective imaging tool for the preprocedural assessment and subsequent follow-up of these patients. This article outlines the technical parameters for obtaining pre- and postoperative CT examinations in endograft patients and discusses the important imaging findings.

Diagnosis and treatment of type II endoleak after stent placement for exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm

After endovascular treatment of AAA, regular clinical and radiologic surveillance is necessary for early diagnosis and treatment of mid-term and long-term complications. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in screening for type II endoleaks and assessing the results of treatment by embolization. From March 1996 to November 1999, 64 patients with uncomplicated infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were treated by endovascular exclusion with a covered aortic stent. Radiological surveillance included plain abdominal roentgenogram (PAR), CT scan, and pelvioabdominal MRI at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Arteriography was performed routinely after 1 year or sooner if an endoleak was suspected. Based on the results of this study, MRI seems to be more sensitive than CT scanning for detection of type II endoleaks. The negative predictive value of MRI is also better. In this series, all endoleaks were treated by embolization. In most cases, the maximum transverse diameter and maximum anteroposterior diameter decreased after embolization. Further follow-up will be necessary to confirm these findings.

Endovascular stent-graft in abdominal aortic aneurysms: the relationship between patent vessels that arise from the aneurysmal sac and early endoleak

PURPOSE

To determine the association of patent sac branch vessels (lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries [IMAs]) with early endoleak rate after stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre- and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) angiograms in 158 patients who underwent stent-graft AAA repair were retrospectively reviewed to determine the preoperative patency of IMAs and other sac branch vessels (feeders) and presence or absence of immediate postoperative endoleak. Relationships of early endoleak rate with total branch vessel, IMA, and lumbar artery patency and graft type were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between patency of sac feeders and rate of early endoleak, especially type 2. As total patent feeders increased from zero to three to four to six, total endoleak rate increased from 6% (one of 17) to 35% (30 of 86); type 2 endoleak rate, from 0% to 25%. IMA patency was significantly associated with total early endoleak rate. Increasing lumbar artery patency also was associated with significantly higher total and type 2 endoleak rates: With zero to three lumbar arteries, the total endoleak rate was 17% and type 2 endoleak rate was 13%, as compared with 60% and 50%, respectively, with more than six patent lumbar arteries.

CONCLUSION

Sac branch vessel patency is associated with significantly higher early total and type 2 endoleak rates after stent-graft repair of AAAs; thus, patent sac branches play an important role in the pathogenesis of endoleaks.

Retroperitoneal endoscopic ligation of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries as a treatment of persistent endoleak after endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair

A 74-year-old man receiving long-term anticoagulation therapy for intermittent atrial fibrillation had a type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. During an 8-month follow-up, the endoleak persisted, and the aneurysm failed to decrease in diameter. By means of a left flank retroperitoneal endoscopic surgical approach, the aneurysm was dissected free, and the lumbar arteries emanating from the aneurysm, as well as the inferior mesenteric artery, were ligated with titanium clips. A postoperative spiral computed tomography scan depicted one pair of unclipped lumbar arteries just proximal to the aortic bifurcation. After immediate reoperation with the same approach, complete thrombosis of the aneurysm sac was radiographically confirmed.

Endoleaks following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

to describe the complication of <<<<endoleak>>>> following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

DESIGN

prospective case study.

SETTING

two specialist vascular surgical centres.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

six patients who had successful conventional open AAA repair.

RESULTS

six patients presented with back or abdominal pain or hypotension between one and eighteen months later. An endoleak at the distal anastomosis was noted in five of the cases and one endoleak at the proximal anastomosis. All six cases were successfully repaired; two of these patients required Dacron graft replacement, whilst in four cases only direct resuturing was needed. There was no evidence of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

an endoleak is not a phenomenon confined to stent grafts. It should be considered in all patients who present with back or abdominal pain within eighteen months of open AAA repair. The combination of computed tomography (CT) scan and digital subtraction angiography is most useful for preoperative diagnosis.

Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Disease

A review is given of endovascular treatment for AAA, thoracic aortic aneurysms, dissections as well as complications following previous aortic surgery. In several of these conditions endovascular treatment has advantages like a reduced operative trauma, shorter stay in hospital, and the possibility of treating patients who would have been unfit for open surgery. On the other hand, problems like endoleak, deformation of the endoprosthesis, retrograde filling of the aneurysmal sack, and graft limb occlusion need to be solved before the place of endovascular treatment can be defined. It is possible that the steadily improving quality of the implants as well as the introducer systems will widen the indications for endovascular surgery, but randomised clinical trials are warranted and a longer follow-up period is necessary to draw final conclusions.

The incidence, natural history, and outcome of secondary intervention for persistent collateral flow in the excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

The goal of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is the prevention of rupture. Exclusion of the infrarenal AAA by means of operation or endovascular graft placement is an alternative therapy to achieve this goal. However, thrombosis of the excluded aneurysm sac does not always occur and further intervention may be needed. This study examines the efficacy of available screening methods to detect the persistence of aneurysm sac flow and the outcome of secondary procedures to treat this problem.

METHODS

During the past 14 years, 1218 patients have undergone operative retroperitoneal exclusion of AAA. To date, 48 patients have been found to have persistent flow in the excluded AAA sac with duplex scanning. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical intervention, and seven of these procedures were performed for rupture. Six patients have undergone treatment with interventional techniques (four successfully). The patients were evaluated for preoperative angiographic, anatomic, and comorbid factors that may have predisposed them to failed exclusion. Also, perioperative morbidity and mortality, estimated blood loss, and survival were assessed in the patients who required surgical treatment.

RESULTS

There were no perioperative parameters that correlated with postoperative persistent flow in the excluded AAA sac. The mean time to secondary intervention was 51 months (range, 2 to 113 months). Two patients had false-negative computed tomographic angiogram results, eight patients had false-negative angiogram results, and six patients had duplex scan examinations that had initially negative results that were then positive for flow in sac. Reoperation had a 7.4% mortality rate (two deaths) and a median blood loss of 2600 mL, as compared with 500 mL for primary procedures.

CONCLUSION

Secondary operations for patent excluded aortic aneurysm sacs have higher mortality and intraoperative blood loss rates than do primary procedures for AAA repair. The localization of branch leaks with computerized tomographic angiography, angiography, and duplex scanning were imprecise, and better methods are needed to adequately diagnose patent sacs. Expansion of AAA sac may be the only reliable factor.